Colloid mill

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6305626
  • Patent Number
    6,305,626
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, May 20, 1999
    25 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 23, 2001
    23 years ago
Abstract
A colloid mill utilizes a motor-driven shaft configuration that connects to the rotor of the colloid mill to the electric motor rotor. In this way, the mill rotor shaft is directly driven. Complex gear or belt drive arrangements between a separate electric motor and the fluid processing components of the colloid mill are thus avoided. Moreover, the gap between the mill rotor and mill stator can be adjusted simply by axially translating the motor-driven shaft. Such translation is provided by a timing belt-based arrangement to limit backlash. As a result, a simple hand-operated knob or stepper motor arrangement can be used to control the gap. Specifically, a thrust bearing is supported in a threaded sleeve that mates with the colloidal mill body. The timing belt engages the sleeve to rotate it relative to the body, thus adjusting the thrust bearings axially along the motor driven shaft and thereby controlling the gap between the mill stator and mill rotor. Also addressed are problems associated with scaling colloid mills and novel rotor configurations using regions of enlarged gap to facilitate the formation of cavitation fields. Precise measurement of the gap between the mill rotor and the mill stator is made possible by incorporating an analogous surface at the same angle as the mill rotor surface, against which a distance indicator can bear.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




Industrial-grade mixing devices are generally divided into classes based upon their ability to mix fluids. Mixing is the process of reducing the size of particles or inhomogeneous species within the fluid. One metric for the degree or thoroughness of mixing is the energy density per unit volume that the mixing device generates to disrupt the fluid particles. The classes are distinguished based on delivered energy densities. There are three classes of industrial mixers having sufficient energy density to consistently produce mixtures or emulsions with particle sizes in the range of 0 to 50 microns.




Homogenization valve systems are typically classified as high energy devices. Fluid to be processed is pumped under very high pressure through a narrow-gap valve into a lower pressure environment. The pressure gradients across the valve and the resulting turbulence and cavitation act to break-up any particles in the fluid. These valve systems are most commonly used in milk homogenization and can yield average particle sizes in the 0-1 micron range.




At the other end of the spectrum are high shear mixer systems, classified as low energy devices. These systems usually have paddles or fluid rotors that turn at high speed in a reservoir of fluid to be processed, which in many of the more common is a food product. These systems are usually used when average particle sizes of greater than 20 microns are acceptable in the processed fluid.




Between high shear mixer and homogenization valve systems, in terms of the mixing energy density delivered to the fluid, are colloid mills, which are classified as intermediate energy devices. The typical colloid mill configuration includes a conical or disk rotor that is separated from a complementary, liquid-cooled stator by a closely-controlled rotor-stator gap, which is commonly between 0.001-0.40 inches. As the rotor rotates at high rates, it pumps fluid between the outer surface of the rotor and the inner surface of the stator, and shear forces generated in the gap process the fluid. Many colloid mills with proper adjustment achieve average particle sizes of 1-25 microns in the processed fluid. These capabilities render colloid mills appropriate for a variety of applications including colloid and oil/water-based emulsion processing such as that required for cosmetics, mayonnaise, or silicone/silver amalgam formation, to roofing-tar mixing.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




Existing colloid mills have suffered from a number of performance- and ease-of-use-related problems.




One such problem relates mechanical complexity and stability. In the past, colloid mills have had mill housings for the rotor/stator and separate electrical motors with direct drive, reduction gear-, or belt-drive systems connecting the motors to the mill rotors. Elaborate mechanical isolation is required because both the mill rotor and the electric motor have separate bearing systems. Furthermore, the mechanisms used to enable rotor-stator gap adjustment, worm gear arrangement in one commercial device, have been mechanically complex and potentially dynamic during operation primarily due to thermal expansion effects.




In the present invention, these problems are avoided by relying on a motor-driven shaft configuration. That is, the shaft that drives and connects to the rotor of the colloid mill extends to the electric motor stator of the electric motor. In this way, the mill rotor shaft is directly driven.




The benefits resulting from this configuration primarily concern simplicity. Complex gear or belt drive arrangements between a separate electric motor and the fluid processing components of the colloid mill are avoided. Moreover, the gap between the mill rotor and mill stator can be adjusted simply by axially translating the motor-driven shaft. The small movements, of typically less than a 0.1 inches, have no or negligible effect on the electromagnetic field generation in the electric motor. Moreover, in this configuration, only one set of thrust bearings are required, and these are located very close to the rotor, thus minimizing any thermal expansion effects on the mill rotor-stator gap.




In general, according to one aspect, the invention features a colloid mill comprising a mill stator, a mill rotor, an electric motor stator, and a motor-driven shaft. This motor-driven shaft functions as an electric motor rotor that operates in cooperation with the electric motor stator, but also extends from the electric motor stator to the mill rotor, providing a direct drive arrangement.




In specific embodiments, a gap adjustment system is provided that changes a gap between the mill stator and the mill rotor by axially translating the motor-driven shaft relative to the electric motor stator. Further, the electric motor driven shaft is axially supported to counteract forces generated between the mill stator and mill rotor by at least one thrust bearing, preferably an angular contact bearing set, that is located on the side of the electric motor stator proximal to the mill rotor. As a result, mere radial support bearings are needed on the distal side of the electric motor stator relative to the mill rotor.




Another problem that arises in existing colloid mill designs is related to the stability of the mill rotor-stator gap and specifically the system used to adjust the gap. One of the most common configurations utilizes a worm-gear arrangement. This system, however, is hard to calibrate and can jam or freeze in response to the forces generated between the mill rotor and stator.




This problem is solved in the present invention by providing a timing belt-based arrangement for adjusting the gap. Such a timing belt system provides for no backlash. As a result, a simple hand-operated knob or stepper motor arrangement can be used to control the gap.




Specifically, a thrust bearing is supported in a threaded sleeve that mates with the colloidal mill body. The timing belt engages the sleeve to rotate it relative to the body, thus adjusting the thrust bearings axially and thereby controlling the gap between the mill stator and mill rotor.




In general, according to another aspect, the invention features a gap adjustment system for a colloid mill. The system comprises at least one thrust bearing that supports a shaft carrying a mill rotor in proximity to a mill stator. A threaded sleeve in turn carries the thrust bearing, its threads mating with complimentary threads of a body of the colloid mill. A timing belt, which is supported by the colloid mill body, engages the threaded sleeve to enable rotation relative to the body to thereby translate the thrust bearings, yielding axial movement of the shaft. This changes the gap between the mill stator and mill rotor.




In specific embodiments, a knob is used to manually adjust the timing belt.




In other embodiments, an adjustment motor, such as a stepper motor is used to adjust the timing belt under microprocessor control.




Another problem that arises in existing mills concerns what happens when a customer requires a new colloid mill for a given manufacturing process to handle higher fluid processing rates. In the past, manufacturers have offered larger and smaller-sized colloid mills to meet customer demand. The problem, however, has been that typically when moving to colloid mills of a higher throughput the manufactures have simply offered larger versions of a geometrically similar mill rotor-stator configuration. Put another way, a colloid mill with a higher throughput had a rotor and stator that looked like the colloid mill with a lower throughput but were simply larger. This technique for modifying colloid mill rotor/mill stator configurations to handle higher fluid volumes yields different processing effects on those fluids. The larger colloid mills tended to process the fluid at different energy densities, typically higher than the smaller colloid mills. This was a problem to the customer since it required recalibration of the processing parameters of the fluid in order to maintain a consistent product.




The present invention uses the recognition that the energy density delivered to the fluid or the characteristics that provide a uniform particle size at the output is related to the third power of the rotor speed and the second power of the rotor diameter. As a result, when scaling mill rotor/mill stator configurations to higher fluid throughput and consequently larger rotors, it is necessary to decrease the rotor speed. In order that the fluid has a consistent residence time and velocity gradient in the mill rotor-stator gap, the surface angle or rotor pitch, however, is increased with increases in the size of the rotor to counteract the effects of the slower rotor speeds. This provides kinematic similarity, or similar changes in velocity as the product traverses the mill rotor-stator gap of different sizes of the colloid mill.




In general, according to another aspect, the invention features a family of colloid mills in which the rotor surface pitch angles increase with increases in colloid mill throughputs. Said another way, the mill rotor surface angles and rotor surface lengths are controlled between colloid mills having different throughput in order to standardize the energy input into the processed fluids.




An other problem with existing mills has been colloid mill rotor configurations. Some mills have long slots that extend down the entire face of the mill rotor, whereas other configurations utilize relatively smooth conical- or disk-shaped rotor configurations. Each configuration has its relative advantages and disadvantages. The smooth rotor configuration tends to generate high and consistent shear forces in the processed fluid. The configuration with the long axially and radially running slots provides high fluid throughput rates, while establishing good turbulence.




The present invention utilizes a largely smooth rotor configuration in order to generate uniformly high shear forces, and thus consistency with correspondingly low variance in the particle size in the processed fluid. The inventive rotor, however, adds an annular region extending around the circumference of the rotor that provides an increased mill rotor/mill stator gap between upstream and downstream, relatively smooth, processing surfaces. This region of increased gap is designed to establish a cavitation field to compliment the largely shear-based fluid processing performed by the adjacent smooth rotor surfaces.




In general, according to another aspect, the invention features a colloid mill rotor that comprises a primary processing surface extending annularly around the rotor, and a secondary processing surface, also extending annularly around the rotor downstream of the primary processing surface. An intermediate, annular processing surface is located axially between the primary and secondary processing surfaces and is depressed relative to those surfaces. During operation, the relative operation of the primary and secondary processing surfaces establishes a low pressure region in the enlarged gap created by the intermediate processing surface. This establishes in many cases a cavitation field that compliments the shear processing of the fluid.




In specific embodiments, radially and axially extending slots are provided in the primary processing surface to facilitate the movement of the processed fluid through the gap. These slots in the primary processing surface cooperate with slots in the associated mill stator to facilitate pre-maceration of the fluid.




The above and other features of the invention including various novel details of construction and combinations of parts, and other advantages, will now be more particularly described with reference to the accompanying drawings and pointed out in the claims. It will be understood that the particular method and device embodying the invention are shown by way of illustration and not as a limitation of the invention. The principles and features of this invention may be employed in various and numerous embodiments without departing from the scope of the invention.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




In the accompanying drawings, like reference characters refer to the same parts throughout the different views. The drawings are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead being placed upon illustrating the principles of the invention. Of the drawings:





FIG. 1

is a side cross-sectional scale view of a colloid mill of the present invention;





FIG. 2A

is a front plan view of the inventive colloid mill;





FIG. 2B

is a front plan view of the inventive colloid mill according to another embodiment offering automated gap control;





FIG. 3

is a side part plan and part cross-sectional view of the inventive mill rotor;





FIG. 4

is a top plan view of the inventive rotor;





FIG. 5

is a side cross-sectional view of the mill stator and housing proximal end-plate;





FIG. 6

is a partial plan view of the mill stator according to the present invention; and





FIG. 7

is a schematic diagram illustrating the difference in rotor surface angles with increases in rotor size to accommodate larger fluid throughput according to the present invention.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION





FIG. 1

shows a colloid mill, which has been constructed according to the principles of the present invention. Generally, the colloid mill


100


comprises a body


110


forming the outer casing and structure of the mill


100


. The body


110


comprises a motor housing


112


that largely contains the electrical, motor components of the mill


100


. The body


110


also comprises a mill housing


114


in which a rotor


180


and stator


178


located, and between which the fluid passes to be processed. Connecting the motor housing


112


with the mill housing


114


is a connecting section housing


116


, which contains the mill rotor-stator gap adjustment system and sealing systems to isolate the interior of the electric motor housing


112


from the interior of the mill housing


114


.




Turning first to the electric motor housing


112


, the motor housing comprises a hollow cylindrical motor jacket


118


. The distal end of the jacket


118


is sealed by a distal motor end-plate


120


, which is attached to the jacket


118


via bolts


122


. The end plate has a center bore


132


to accommodate the mounting of a motor-driven shaft


130


. The distal end of the shaft


130


is supported at the end-plate


120


via radial support bearing


128


. The radial support bearing


128


is prohibited from rotating in the inner bore


132


of the end-plate


120


by bearing gasket


134


.




Within the electric motor housing, attached around the inter-surface of the jacket


118


, are stator coils


136


. These cooperate with rotor coils


138


attached to the shaft


130


to generate an electromotive force to drive the shaft


130


.




The electric motor housing


112


is supported in this embodiment on a formed baseplate.




The proximal end of the electric motor casing


118


is closed by a proximal end-plate


142


. This end-plate has a center bore


144


to accommodate the shaft


130


. The center bore


144


has internal threads


146


that cooperate with threads


150


on a thrust bearing sleeve


148


.




The thrust bearing sleeve


148


carries, in the illustrated embodiment, three thrust bearings


152


, which are preferably angular contact-bearings to provide good rigidity and limit backlash. The thrust bearings are prohibited from axial movement in the distal direction within the bearing sleeve


148


via an annular retaining ring


154


which is bolted to the distal end of the sleeve via bolts


156


, and the thrust bearings are retained from moving in the proximal axial direction by lip


158


on sleeve


148


.




The shaft


130


is moved axially relative to the body


110


by rotating the bearing sleeve


148


in the proximal end-plate


142


. This adjustment allows the control of the mill rotor/stator gap. Bearing sleeve rotation is achieved by a timing belt


160


. The timing belt engages a bearing sleeve belt pulley


162


that is rigidly connected to and turns with the thrust bearing sleeve


148


. Access is provided to the belt pulley ring


162


via a partially annular slot


164


in the connecting section housing


116


. As a result of this configuration, driving the timing belt


160


causes the rotation of the bearing sleeve


148


relative to the mill body


110


. This moves the thrust bearing sleeve


148


axially via the interaction between threads


146


,


150


to move the thrust bearings


152


and thus the shaft


130


axially. The gap between the processing surfaces of the mill rotor and mill stator is adjustable from approximately 0.001 to 0.050 inches in the preferred embodiment.





FIG. 2A

is a front view of the colloid mill


100


specifically showing the support system for the timing belt


160


. Specifically, a triangular-shaped support bracket


210


extends from the connecting housing


116


, being attached by a series of bolts


212


. A knob


214


is journaled to the support bracket


210


. The path of the timing belt


160


extends from the bearing sleeve belt pulley


162


to an adjustment pulley


216


connected to the knob


214


. As a result of this arrangement, manual rotation of the knob


216


rotates the bearing sleeve


148


to move it axially and thus, adjust the gap between the processing surfaces of the mill rotator


180


and mill stator


178


.





FIG. 2B

illustrates an alternative embodiment for effecting mill rotor/stator gap control. Instead of a knob, a stepper motor


200


is used to drive the timing belt


160


. The stepper motor


200


is controlled by computer


202


to provide automated control of the rotor-stator gap with feedback from the LVDT


161


. This automated system enables better process control since the gap is continuously monitored and adjusted when necessary, and a history of gap size for a processing run is maintained to provide for process validation. Further, it enables clean-in-place operations in which the gap is changed automatically according to a profile while a cleaning solution is passed through the mill, thus requiring limited operator supervision. Preferably, the speed of the shaft


130


is also controlled by modulating the stator and/rotor field current using the computer


202


.




In alternative embodiments, the stepper motor is configured to directly turn the bearing sleeve, preferably via a gear train. This configuration is not preferred, however, because of the loss of the beneficial effects of the timing belt, such as backlash control.




Returning to

FIG. 1

, the belt pulley ring


162


of the bearing sleeve


148


additionally has a system that cooperates with the connecting section housing


116


to indicate or provide a read-out for the mill rotor/stator gap. The pulley ring


162


has an read-out surface


163


, the angle of which preferably matches the angle of the rotor. A window


165


is formed in the connecting section housing


116


. A linearly variable distance transducer (LVDT)


161


is installed within the window


165


and detects changes in the distance to the read-out surface


163


. As a result of this arrangement, by reading-out the distance to the read-out surface


161


, the distance between the processing surfaces of the mill rotor


180


and stator


178


is determined electronically by the LVDT


161


.




Alternatively, a dial indicator or a digital position indicator can be installed together with or in place of the LVDT so as to permit direct mechanical readout of the mill/rotor/stator gap.




The mill housing


114


is a fluid sealed compartment. It comprises a hollow cylindrical casing


168


with a distal, end-plate


170


. The end-plate


170


of the mill housing


114


has a center bore


172


through which the shaft


130


projects into the mill housing


114


. A system of seals


174


, surrounding the shaft within the center bore


172


, prevents contamination from the motor/environment from reaching the fluid to be processed within the housing


114


and prevents processed fluid from escaping into the outside environment from within the mill housing


114


. Additionally, a proximal oil seal


166


seals the connecting section housing


116


from the motor housing


112


.




The proximal end of the mill housing is sealed via a proximal mill housing end-plate


176


, which also functions as the mill stator. Specifically, the proximal mill housing end-plate comprises an axial-extending tubular column


177


providing an input port


179


through which fluid to be processed enters the colloidal mill


100


. A corkscrew-shaped fluid pump


194


within the entrance port


179


draws the fluid to be processed into the mill housing


114


.




The fluid progresses to the left in the illustration of

FIG. 1

to the processing surface of a stator


178


, which is an integral part of the mill housing proximal end-plate


176


. Rotor


180


, which is connected to the shaft


130


, pulls the fluid to be processed between the processing surfaces of the rotor


180


and the stator


178


into processed fluid reservoir


182


, from which the fluid exits the mill housing


114


via exit tube


184


out through exit port


186


.




The proximal mill end-plate


176


is sealed to the mill casing


168


via primary and secondary seals


188


,


190


. Cooling fluid reservoir


192


in the mill housing proximal end-plate carries a cooling liquid to remove heat generated by the rotor's rotation against the stator


178


.





FIG. 3

is a side, partially cut-away view of a mill rotor constructed according to the principles of the present invention. In the preferred embodiment, the pitch angle of rotor


180


is approximately α=81.4 degrees.




Specifically, the mill rotor


180


has an annular primary processing surface


310


. A series of radially and axially extending slots


312


are formed in the primary processing surface. The slots facilitate pre-maceration of the incoming fluid.




Downstream of the primary processing surface is an intermediate processing surface


314


. This intermediate processing surface is depressed relative to the primary processing surface


310


. In the preferred embodiment, it is depressed by approximately a=0.063 inches. This depression, creates a reservoir of fluid in the gap between the intermediate processing surface


314


and the processing surface of stator


178


. In this reservoir, a low pressure field is generated which facilitates cavitation. This effect contributes to the mixing of the fluid to be processed and complements the largely shear effects created in the fluid between the primary processing surface


310


and the stator


178


. The intermediate processing surface length is c=0.688 inches in the preferred embodiment.




Downstream of the intermediate processing surface


314


is a secondary processing surface


316


also extending annularly around the rotor


180


. The secondary processing surface


316


is raised above the intermediate processing surface


314


by essentially the same distance as the primary processing surface is above the intermediate processing surface. Both the intermediate and secondary processing surfaces are continuous in contrast to the primary processing surface


310


that has the slots


312


. In the preferred embodiment, the surface length of the secondary processing surface


310


is b=0.74 inches.





FIG. 4

is a top plan view of the rotor


180


, showing the primary processing surface


310


, the intermediate processing surface


314


and the secondary processing surface


316


. Also shown are the array of slots


312


in the primary processing surface


310


. In the preferred embodiment,


12


slots are provided evenly spaced around the circumference of the rotor. Also as shown, the central line


318


of the slots


312


does not pass through the axis of rotation


320


of the rotor


180


. There is a distance of e=0.563 inches between the center line of slot


312


and a line extending parallel to the slot centerline


318


through the axis of rotation


320


of the rotor


180


. In the preferred embodiment, the slots are approximately d=0.125 inches wide. Additionally, the total diameter of the rotor


180


is j=5.0 inches and the center diameter is k=1.562 inches.





FIG. 5

is a cross sectional view of the proximal mill housing end-plate


176


. A series of stator slots


340


are formed on the inner surface of the stator


178


. These slots are f=1.2 inches long. Downstream of the slots' termini is a hardened annular section


342


of the stator


178


. Specifically, this hardened section is approximately g=1.487 inches long and is filled with STELLITE to a depth of h=0.075 inches in order to provide a long-wearing processing surface.





FIG. 6

is a plan view of the stator


178


looking out through the input port


179


. This view shows that in the preferred embodiment, ten of the slots


340


are provided in the inner surface of the stator evenly spaced and extending in a radial direction.




A different number of rotor slots than stator slots is used so to remove any beating and thereby minimize vibration. As a result, the slots in the rotor do not all confront a slot in the stator at the same time during rotation. Further, the rotor slots


312


are angled with respect to the stator slots


340


. This feature creates the effect of the stator slots


340


moving radially outward and downward over the rotor slots


312


as the rotor


180


turns. This generates a pressure-popping effect that facilitates mixing.





FIG. 7

illustrates the relationship between colloid mill rotors for colloid mills of different throughputs, when the rotors are constructed according to the principles of the present invention.




According to the present invention, the intent is to match the energy input per unit volume into the fluid across the range of colloid mills with different fluid throughput. This is achieved by maintaining the same value of the rotor speed, in revolutions per minute, to the third power, times rotor diameter to the second power (N


3


D


2


) at the exit of the milling gap. The time over which a given volume of fluid is processed in the mills′ rotor/stator gaps and the change in milling intensity is standardized between different throughput mills by maintaining the same percent change in velocity of the processed fluid as it moves down the processing surface of the rotor.




If bar


414


is defined as an arbitrary axial length of a potential rotor for a colloid mill of the present invention, and


416


is a point selected along the rotor's axis of rotation


320


, then where rays


410


, evenly spaced about the axis of rotation, cut through the bar defines the rotor's processing surfacing length and rotor diameter. The angle α′ between the rays defines the rotor's pitch angle. To design a rotor for a higher throughput colloid mill, rays


412


from point


416


are defined at an increased rotor pitch angle α′. Where these new rays cross bar


414


, they define the rotor processing surface length and rotor diameter. As a result, the rotor pitch angle increases with increases in the rotor diameter and thus colloid mill throughput according to the present invention. Processed fluid moves at the same velocity through the gap regardless of rotor size. The increases in pitch has the effect of exposing the fluid to increases in the centripetal force even though the net force remains the same due to the decreased speed at which the larger rotors are run.




While this invention has been particularly shown and described with references to preferred embodiments thereof, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and details may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims. Those skilled in the art will recognize or be able to ascertain using no more than routine experimentation, many equivalents to the specific embodiments of the invention described specifically herein. Such equivalents are intended to be encompassed in the scope of the claims.



Claims
  • 1. A colloid mill comprising:a mill stator; a mill rotor; an electric motor stator; an electric motor rotor; a common motor shaft that extends from the mill rotor to the electric motor rotor such that the mill rotor is directly driven by the motor rotor; and a gap adjustment system that changes a gap between the mill stator and the mill rotor, the gap adjustment system including at least one thrust bearing that supports the motor shaft, a threaded sleeve that carries the thrust bearing, and a colloid mill body having complementary threads engaging the threaded sleeve to enable rotation of the threaded sleeve relative to the colloid mill body to translate the thrust bearing for changing the gap between the mill stator and the mill rotor.
  • 2. A colloid mill as described in claim 1, further comprising:a colloid mill body containing the electric motor stator, electric motor rotor, mill stator, and mill rotor; and a thrust bearing that supports the motor-driven shaft against axial forces generated between mill stator and mill rotor.
  • 3. A colloid mill as described in claim 2, wherein the at least one thrust bearing comprises angular contact bearings.
  • 4. A colloid mill as described in claim 2, wherein the thrust bearing is located on a side of the electric motor rotor proximal to the mill rotor.
  • 5. A colloid mill as described in claim 4, further comprising radial support bearings that support the motor-driven shaft on a distal side of the electric motor stator relative to the mill rotor.
  • 6. A colloid mill as described in claim 1, further comprising a timing belt supported by the colloid mill body and engaging the threaded sleeve.
  • 7. A colloid mill as described in claim 6, further comprising means for manually adjusting the timing belt.
  • 8. A colloid mill as described in claim 6, further comprising an adjustment motor that adjusts the timing belt under computer control.
  • 9. A colloid mill as described in claim 1, further comprising a gap detection system that determines a size of the gap between the mill stator and the mill rotor.
  • 10. A colloid mill comprising:a mill stator; a mill rotor; an electric motor stator; common motor shaft means for driving the mill rotor extending from the mill rotor to the electric motor rotor such that the mill rotor is directly driven by the motor rotor; and gap adjustment means for changing a gap between the mill stator and the mill rotor, the gap adjustment means including at least one thrust bearing that supports the motor shaft, a threaded sleeve that carries the thrust bearing, and a colloid mill body having complementary threads engaging the threaded sleeve to enable rotation of the threaded sleeve relative to the colloid mill body to translate the thrust bearing for changing the gap between the mill stator and the mill rotor.
US Referenced Citations (9)
Number Name Date Kind
2891733 Asplund Jun 1959
3224689 Behrens et al. Dec 1965
3788565 Adama Jan 1974
4109873 Lichfield Aug 1978
4113189 Sullivan Sep 1978
4994212 Vos et al. Feb 1991
4999033 Vos et al. Mar 1991
5605290 Brenholdt Feb 1997
5795583 Grune et al. Aug 1998
Foreign Referenced Citations (5)
Number Date Country
1 607 493 Sep 1969 DE
26 55 266 Jul 1978 DE
32 21 476 Dec 1983 DE
792227 Mar 1958 GB
96526 Dec 1960 NL
Non-Patent Literature Citations (49)
Entry
“Kolloidmühlen und Prozeβanlagen”, Chemie-Technik, 14 Jahrgang, Nr. 11, pp. 110-114 (1985).
“Premier Colloid Mills, The Ultimate in Dispersing and Emulsifying”, Brochure for Premier Mill, One Birchmont Drive, Reading, PA 19606-3298.
“Gifford-Wood Mixers, by Greerco”, Brochure for Chemineer, Inc., A Unit of Robbins & Meyers, Inc., 125 Flagship Drive, North Andover, MA 10845.
“Engineered Process Systems for High Technology Industries”, Brochure for Collaborative Process Systems, Inc., 25 East Loop Road, Stony Brook, NY 11790-3350.
“Wet Mixing Equipment”, Brochure for Bematek Systems, Incorporated, 117 Elliott St., P.O. Box 264, Beverly, MA 01915.
“Toothed Colloid Mill”, Brochure for Fryma-Maschinen AG, CH-4310 Rheinfelden, Switzerland.
“Tri-Homo Colloid Mills”, Catalog TH980, Brochure for Sonic, Tri-Homo Division, Sonic Corp., One Research Drive, Stratford, CT 06497.
“Evolutionary Engineering”, Brochure for Charles Ross & Son Company, P.O. Box 12308, 710 Old Willets Path, Hauppauge, NY 11788-4193.
“Cavitron Reactor Systems”, Brochure for Arde Barinco, Inc., 500 Walnut Street, Norwood, NJ 07648.
“Dicon In-Line Dispersing Grinders”, Brochure for Arde Barinco, Inc., 500 Walnut Street, Norwood, NJ 07648.
“Dispersing, Grinding, Shearing, Chopping”, Brochure for Arde Barinco, 19 Industrial Ave., Mahwah, NJ 07430.
“The Reversible Mixer”, Brochure for Arde Barinco, Inc., 500 Walnut Street, Norwood, New Jersey 07648.
“Wet Mixing & Homogenizing Machines”, Brochure for Bematek Systems, Inc., 12 Tozer Road, P.O. Box 264, Beverly, MA 01915.
“Brogtec Mischtechnik GMBH”, Brochure for Brogtec, D-79618 Rheinfelden, Güterstrasse 1, Germany.
“Collovelox”, Brochure for Brogtec, D-79618 Rheinfelden, Güterstrasse 1, Germany.
“Cavitron—für die Verfahrenstechnik”, Brochure for Cavitron, v. Hagen & Funke Gmbh—Verfahrenstechnik, Am Leveloh 9, Industriegebiet Bossel, D-45549 Sprockhövel.
“Charlotte Colloid Mill, State-of-the-Art Product Processing”, Brochure for Chemicolloid Laboratories, Inc., 55 Herricks Road, Garden City Park, New York 11040.
“Asphalt Emulsion and The Charlotte Colloid Mill”, Brochure for Chemicolloid Laboratories, Inc., 55 Herricks Road, Garden City Park, NY 11040.
“The Boston Shearpump”, Brochure by Copek Industrial, Inc., 170 Linden Street, Wellesley, MA 01281.
“Supraton Homogenization, Dispersion and Reaction Machines”, Brochure for Dorr-Oliver Incorporated, 612 Wheeler's Farm Road, Milford, CT 06460-8719.
“The Mighty Gorator”, Brochure for Dorr-Oliver Incorporated, 612 Wheeler's Farm Road, Milford, CT 06460-8719.
Fryma Processing Technology and Machine/Systems Fabrication, Brochure for Fryma-Maschinen Ag, Postfach 164, CH-4310 Rheinfelden, Switzerland.
“Pipeline Mixers”, Brochure for Greerco Corp., P.O. Box 187, 2 Wentworth Drive, Hudson, NH 03051.
“Homomixers”, Brochure for Brochure for Greerco Corp., P.O. Box 187, 2 Wentworth Drive, Hudson, NH 03051.
“Colloid Mills”, Brochure for Brochure for Greerco Corp., P.O. Box 187, 2 Wentworth Drive, Hudson, NH 03051.
“IKA Maschinenbau”, Brochure for IKA Maschinenbau, Janke & Kunkel GMBH & Co.KG,, Postfach 1165, D-79216, Staufen.
“JayHawk Mills”, Brochure for Jayhawk Manufacturing Company, 507 N. Whiteside /P.O. Box 313, Hutchinson, KS 67504-0313.
“The Kady Mill”, Brochure for Kady International, 127 Pleasant Hill Road, P.O. Box 847, Scarborough, ME 04070-0847.
“Polytron Dispersing and Mixing Technology”, Brochure by Kinematica, Inc., Dispersing and Mixing Technology, 260 Northland Blvd., Suite 335, Cincinnati, OH 45246.
“Polytron Dispersing and Mixing Technology”, Brochure by Kinematica, Inc., Dispersing and Mixing Technology, 260 Northland Blvd., Suite 335, Cincinnati, OH 45246.
“Megatron Dispersing and Mixing Technology”, Brochure by Kinematica, Inc., Dispersing and Mixing Technology, 260 Northand Blvd., Suite 335, Cincinnati, OH 45246.
“Megatron Dispersing and Mixing Technology”, Brochure by Kinematica, Inc., Dispersing and Mixing Technology, 260 Northland Blvd., Suite 335, Cincinnati, OH 45246.
“Machines and Production Systems for the Pharmaceutical Industry”, Brochure by Koruma Maschinenbau GmbH, P.O. Box 1160, D-79389 Neuenburg, Germany.
“Multi-Purpose Mills”, Brochure by Koruma Maschinenbau GmbH, P.O. Box 1160, D-79389 Neuenburg, Germany.
“PUC Colloid Technology”, Brochur by GmbH & Co KG, D-7550 Rastatt/Baden, P.O.B. 2053.
“Ross X-Series Mixer Emulsifiers”, Brochure by Charles Ross & Son Company, P.O. Box 12308, 710 Old Willets Path, Hauppauge, NY 11788.
“Trigonal—Maschinen”, Brochure by Siefer MaschinenFabrik GmbH & Co KG, Bahnhofstraβe 114, D-42551, Velbert, Germany.
“MultiMill”, Brochure by Sigma Equipment Corp., 39 Westmoreland Avenue, White Plains, New York 10606.
“High Shear In-Line Mixers”, Brochure by Silverson Machines, Inc., P.O. Box 589, 355 Chestnut Street, East Longmeadow, MA 01028.
“T.K. Products—Chemical Equipment and System Engineering for Process Industries”, Brochure by T.K. Products, 1565 N. Harmony Circle, Anaheim, CA 92807.
“T.K. Homo Mixer”, Brochure by Tokushu Kika Kogyo Co., Ltd., 16-43, Ebie 8-chome, Fukushima-ku, Osaka, 553, Japan.
“T.K. Pipeline Homo Mixer”, Brochure by Brochure by Tokushu Kika Kogyo Co., Ltd., 16-43, Ebie 8-chome, Fukushima-ku, Osaka, 553, Japan.
“T.K. Mycolloider”, Brochure by Tokushu Kika Kogyo Co., Ltd., 16-43, Ebie 8-chome, Fukushima-ku, Osaka, 553, Japan.
“Waukesha Colloid Mill”, Brochure by Waukesha Fluid Handling, 611 Sugar Creek Road, Delavan, WI 53115.
“Waukesha Shear Pump”, Brochure by Waukesha Fluid Handling, 611 Sugar Creek Road, Delavan, WI 53115.
Dispersing Machines, Brochure by ystral gmbh, Maschinenbau + processtechnik, Wettelbrunner Strasse 7, D-7801 Ballrechten-Dotttingen, West Germany.
“Review of Our Program”, Brochure by ystral gmbh, Maschinenbau + processtechnik, Wettelbrunner Strasse 7, D-7801 Ballrechten-Dottingen, West Germany.
“Quadro-Ytron—The Latest Technology for Wet Mixing”, Brochure by Quadro Process, Inc., 613 colby Drive, Waterloo, Ont. Canada N2V 1A1.
“Ytron-Z”, Brochure by Ytron Dr. Karg GMBH, Osternacher Strasse 50, D-83209 Prien am Chiemsee.