COLLOIDAL PARTICLE FORMULATIONS WITH ADVANCED FUNCTIONALITY

Abstract

Disclosed is a method for creating a composite colloidal particle formulation with advanced functionality that possesses highly efficient and effective properties. The composite colloidal particle formulation comprises an engineered biodegradable particle core dispersed in a bioadhesive polyelectrolyte solution. Also disclosed are methods of use of the same, including but not limited to applying said formulation to plants for disease treatment.

Description

1. FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The field of the invention relates to creating a composite colloidal particle formulation with advanced functionality that possesses highly efficient and effective properties. The composite colloidal particle formulation comprises an engineered biodegradable particle core dispersed in a bioadhesive polyelectrolyte solution. Also disclosed are methods of use of the same.

2. BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Colloidal micro- and nano-particle composite formulation products have the potential to solve problems in a wide range of economic sectors such as energy production and storage [1-5], construction [6-8], environmental remediation [9-11], agriculture [12-14] and healthcare [15, 16] among others. Because of their small size and large surface area to mass ratio, colloidal particles offer the opportunity to produce new structures and material composite formulations with unique physicochemical properties and function. Despite the great potential economic and industrial impact, possible environmental, health and safety risks associated with the use of various synthetic inorganic micro- and nano-particles and concerns of post-utilization persistence have limited their widespread application [17, 18]. Some of these problems can be mitigated largely by utilizing biorenewable and biodegradable feedstock biopolymers such as cellulose, hemicellulose, lignocellulose or lignin to engineer biodegradable particle formulations with advanced performance properties and functionality. In the environment, these plant-derived biopolymer formulations are broken down post-utilization by microorganisms into carbon dioxide and water. Because the released carbon dioxide can be captured back by plants, this makes them environmentally friendly and sustainable.

Lignin is the most abundant terrestrial aromatic bioplolymer [19]. Lignin plays a vital role in plant health, growth and development by providing structural integrity of the cell wall of the plant. Upon processing of plant biomass lignin structure undergoes changes depending on the processing method. For example, the most common extraction method of lignin widely used in the pulp and paper industry is the Kraft pulping process. The lignin recovered from this process is called Kraft lignin. During Kraft processing, sulfur-containing groups are added to modify its structure and composition. Kraft lignin provides an example of sulfonated lignin. Another industrial process uses “organosolv” extraction, and the resulting lignin is known as Organosolve lignin. Organosolve lignin has a final structure close to its natural form, does not contain sulfur, and is highly hydrophobic.

Another class of sustainable materials used in a variety of industries comprises of natural polyelectrolytes. Polyelectrolytes are charged molecules and can be anionic or cationic. Polyelectrolytes play a fundamental role in determining structure, stability and the interactions of various colloidal formulations. In addition, the presence of polyelectrolytes in a formulation can make the system bioadhesive. Polysaccharides (such as chitosan and other natural carbohydrates), polypeptides, lectins, proteins and antibodies represent examples of bioadhesive polyelectrolyte systems [20].

Solanaceae is mainly a tropical family of about 75 genera and 2000 species. The more important vegetable genera are Solanum (potato and eggplant), Lycopersicon (tomato), and Capsicum (pepper). The Solanaceae, widely known as the nightshade family, also includes some poisonous alkaloid-containing species such as belladonna (Atropa belladonna), mandrake (Mandragora officinarum), henbane (Hyoscyamusniger), Jimson weed (Datura stramonium), climbing nightshade (Solanum dulcamara), and widely used tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum). The Solanaceae include a number of commonly collected or cultivated species. The most economically important genus of the family [13] is Solanum, which contains the potato (S. tuberosum, in fact, another common name of the family is the “potato family”), the tomato (S. lycopersicum), and the eggplant or aubergine (S. melongena). Another important genus, Capsicum, produces both chili peppers and bell peppers.

The genus Physalis produces the so-called groundcherries, as well as the tomatillo (Physalis philadelphica), the Cape gooseberry and the Chinese lantern. The genus Lycium contains the boxthorns and the wolfberry Lycium barbarum. Nicotiana contains, among other species, tobacco. Some other important members of Solanaceae include a number of ornamental plants such as Petunia, Browallia, and Lycianthes, and sources of psychoactive alkaloids, Datura, Mandragora (mandrake), and Atropa belladonna (deadly nightshade). Certain species are widely known for their medicinal uses, their psychotropic effects, or for being poisonous.

Most of the economically important genera are contained in the subfamily Solanoideae, with the exceptions of tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum, Nicotianoideae) and petunia (Petunia×hybrida, Petunioideae).

Many of the Solanaceae, such as tobacco and petunia, are used as model organisms in the investigation of fundamental biological questions at the cellular, molecular, and genetic levels.

Members of the Solanaceae family are challenged by a large number of microbes and bacterial and fungal plant pathogens causing diseases. Bacterial spot, caused by Xanthomonas spp., is one of the most damaging and difficult to control diseases in vegetable crops. For example, bacterial spot disease has high negative impact on yield of tomato and pepper plants grown in warm, humid regions. Infections typically result in leave and fruit lesions, defoliation, and yield loss of marketable fruit. If weather conditions are optimal for disease development, bacterial spot can cause yield losses up to 50%. X. perforans is the dominant species causing bacterial spot disease [13].

3. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present disclosure, as embodied and broadly described herein, provides:

• 1. A method of creating a composite colloidal particle formulation comprising an engineered biodegradable particle core, the method comprising:
  • a. Contacting an ethanol-based solvent containing dissolved biopolymer with an anti-solvent in a T-piece so as to form a engineered biodegradable particle core; and
  • b. Dispersing the engineered biodegradable particle core in a bioadhesive polyelectrolyte solution.
• 2. The composite colloidal particle formulation produced by the method of claim 1.
• 3. The composite colloidal particle formulation of claim 2, wherein the engineered biodegradable particle core comprises a plant-derived biopolymer.
• 4. The composite colloidal particle formulation of claim 2, wherein the engineered biodegradable particle core comprises a lignin, a modified lignin, polysaccharide, modified polysaccharide or a combination thereof.
• 5. The composite colloidal particle formulation of claim 4, wherein the modified lignin is an unsulfonated or sulfonated lignin.
• 6. The composite colloidal particle formulation of claim 4, wherein the polysaccharide is cellulose, hemicellulose, lignocellulose, glyco-protein, or a combination thereof
• 7. The composite colloidal particle formulation of claim 4, wherein the composite colloidal particle formulation comprises lignin at a concentration of at least 0.001 percent by weight.
• 8. The composite colloidal particle formulation of claim 2, wherein the composite colloidal particle formulation is cationic.
• 9. The composite colloidal particle formulation of claim 2, wherein the composite colloidal particle formulation comprises carbohydrates, polypeptides, lectins, proteins, or antibodies or other molecules or materials with affinity to microbes, viruses, seeds, or plant foliage.
• 10. The composite colloidal particle formulation of claim 2, wherein the composite colloidal particle formulation comprises chitosan at a concentration of at least 0.005 percent by weight.
• 11. The composite colloidal particle formulation of claim 2, wherein the particle has a diameter of about 10 nm to about 500 nm.
• 12. A coated article comprising a surface wherein at least a portion of the surface is coated with the composite colloidal particle formulation of claim 2.
• 13. A method for treating or preventing disease in a plant comprising applying to the plant the composite colloidal particle formulation of claim 2.
• 14. The method of treating or preventing disease in claim 13 wherein the disease is caused by a bacterial or fungal pathogen.
• 15. The method of claim 13 wherein the disease is bacterial spot.
• 16. A method of producing final formulation volumes of at least one liter, of a composite colloidal particle formulation comprising an engineered biodegradable particle core, the method comprising:
  • a. Contacting an ethanol-based solvent containing dissolved biopolymer with an anti-solvent in a T-piece so as to form an engineered biopolymer particle core; and
  • b. Dispersing the engineered biodegradable particle core in a bioadhesive polyelectrolyte solution.
• 17. The method of claim 13, wherein the plant is a member of the family Solanaceae.
• 18. The method of claim 13, wherein the plant is a member of the genus Capsicum.
• 19. The method of claim 13, wherein the plant is a member of the genus Lycopersicon.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1. Schematic of negatively charged engineered biopolymer particles (A), comprising metal ions (B) and/or dispersed in cationic polyelectrolyte to obtain positively charged functional composite colloidal particle formulations (C and D).

FIG. 2. Schematic of the fabrication process for preparation of engineered biopolymer particles. The biopolymer is dissolved in ethanol-water (referred as biopolymer stock solution) which is mixed with anti-solvent in a T-unit piece (denoted by T). This results in formation of biopolymer engineered biodegradable particles dispersed in anti-solvent.

FIG. 3. (A) Dependence of hydrodynamic diameter, (B) particle size distribution measured by polydispersity index—PDI, (C) particle size range, and (D) zeta potential on biopolymer stock concentration (n=3).

FIG. 4. (A) Dependence of hydrodynamic diameter, (B) particle size distribution measured by polydispersity index—PDI, (C) particle size range, and (D) zeta potential on biopolymer volumetric stock rate (n=3). Solid bars denote 1 wt % biopolymer stock concentration. Patterned bars denote 3 wt % biopolymer stock concentration.

FIG. 5. (A) Dependence of hydrodynamic diameter, (B) particle size distribution measured by polydispersity index—PDI, (C) particle size range, and (D) zeta potential on anti-solvent volumetric flow rate (n=3). Solid bars denote 1 wt % biopolymer stock concentration. Patterned bars denote 3 wt % biopolymer stock concentration.

FIG. 6. (A) Dependence of hydrodynamic diameter, (B) particle size distribution measured by polydispersity index—PDI, (C) particle size range, and (D) zeta potential on anti-solvent volume (n=3). Solid bars—1 wt % biopolymer stock concentration. Patterned bars—3 wt % biopolymer stock concentration.

FIG. 7. Mechanism of particle formation. (A) Evolution of hydrodynamic diameter, (B) particle size distribution measured by polydispersity index—PDI, (C) particle size range, and (D) zeta potential over reaction time (n=3). Solid bars—1 wt % biopolymer stock concentration. Patterned bars—3 wt % biopolymer stock concentration.

FIG. 8. Stability of engineered biopolymer particles as indicated by the change of particle size range over time. (A) At formulation—0 d; (B) One (1) week post formulation—1 w; (C) Six (6) months post formulation—6 m.

FIG. 9. Morphology of biopolymer engineered biodegradable particle cores one day after preparation (A) and 6 months post-preparation (B) as determined by transmission electron microscopy.

FIG. 10. (A) Hydrodynamic diameter, (B) polydispersity index, PDI, and (C) zeta potential for ten randomly selected samples of engineered biodegradable particle cores containing copper ions (0.01 wt %).

FIG. 11. (A) Hydrodynamic diameter, (B) polydispersity index, PDI, and (C) zeta potential for ten randomly selected samples of engineered biodegradable particle cores containing copper ions at 0.01 wt % in bioadhesive solution of chitosan at 0.01 wt %.

FIG. 12. (A) Hydrodynamic diameter, (B) polydispersity index, PDI, and (C) zeta potential for ten randomly selected samples of engineered biodegradable particle cores formulation in bioadhesive solution of chitosan at 0.01 wt %.

FIG. 13. In vitro activity of engineered composite lignin (0.01 wt %)-chitosan (0.01 wt %), lignin (0.01 wt %)-copper (0.01 wt %), and lignin (0.01 wt %)-copper (0.01 wt %)-chitosan (0.01 wt %), particle formulations. Kocide 3000 (Cu ions 0.1 wt %) and sterile deionized water were used as the positive and negative control, respectively (n=4). Experiments with copper sensitive X. perforans strain. CFU=colony forming units.

FIG. 14. In vitro activity of engineered composite lignin (0.01 wt %)-chitosan (0.01 wt %), lignin (0.01 wt %)-copper (0.01 wt %), and lignin (0.01 wt %)-copper (0.01 wt %)-chitosan (0.01 wt %) particle formulations. Kocide 3000 (Cu ions at 0.1 wt %) and sterile deionized water were used as the positive and negative control, respectively (n=4). Experiments with copper resistant X. perforans strain. CFU=colony forming units.

FIG. 15. Field test with inoculation—tomato: (A) Effect of composite colloidal particle formulations (lignin (0.01 wt %)-chitosan (0.01 wt %)—Treatment D; lignin (0.01 wt %)-copper (0.01 wt %)-chitosan (0.01 wt %)—Treatment E; lignin (0.01 wt %)-copper (0.01 wt %)—Treatment F; on bacterial spot disease severity in the open field. Water—Treatment A; Kocide 3000—Treatment B; and the growers' standard—Treatment C were used as control treatments. AUDPC=area under disease progress curve. Error bars=standard deviation (n=4). * denotes statistical significance at P<0.05.

FIG. 16. Field test without inoculation—tomato: (A) Effect of composite colloidal particle formulations (lignin (0.01 wt %)-chitosan (0.01 wt %)—Treatment D; lignin (0.01 wt %)-copper (0.01 wt %)-chitosan (0.01 wt %)—Treatment E; lignin (0.01 wt %)-copper (0.01 wt %)—Treatment F; on bacterial spot disease severity in the open field. Water—Treatment A; Kocide 3000—Treatment B; and the growers' standard—Treatment C were used as control treatments. AUDPC=area under disease progress curve. Error bars=standard deviation (n=6). * denotes statistical significance at P<0.05.

FIG. 17. Field test—pepper: (A) Effect of composite colloidal particle formulations (lignin (0.01 wt %)-chitosan (0.01 wt %)—Treatment D; lignin (0.01 wt %)-copper (0.01 wt %)-chitosan (0.01 wt %)—Treatment E; lignin-copper (0.01 wt %)—Treatment F; on bacterial spot disease severity in the open field. Water—Treatment A; Kocide 3000—Treatment B; and the growers' standard—Treatment C were used as control treatments. AUDPC=area under disease progress curve. Error bars=standard deviation (n=6).

4. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

1. Results

1.1 Preparation and Characterization of Engineered Colloidal Particles Made of Biopolymer

Despite the exciting potential benefits that colloidal materials can bring in a wide range of industries [1, 6, 9, 12, 15], the number of the available commercial applications and products is limited. The problem is the need to generate stable colloidal formulations on a large scale at low manufacturing costs. Here disclosed is a new bench scale semi-continuous system that can produce large volumes of concentrated colloidal particle solutions in a controlled manner. FIG. 2 depicts the unit operations of the process which is highly efficient, green (being mostly water-based), inexpensive and scalable.

The first step in the fabrication of engineered colloidal particles involves dissolving the biopolymer, organosolv lignin, in a common solvent to form a solution (also referred to as stock solution). The choice of solvent in this step is an important aspect of process sustainability. From a range of available solvents for lignin, ethanol was chosen as the solvent. Ethanol is generally recognized as non-toxic, biodegradable, and biorenewable solvent. It is classified as an environmentally preferable green solvent because it is commonly produced by fermenting renewable sources, including sugars, starches, and lignocelluloses. In comparison with other solvents, ethanol is a relatively low-cost and readily available.

The second step in the formation of engineered colloidal particles involves mixing of lignin solvent stock and anti-solvent medium—water—in a T-unit piece. The T-unit piece is a junction in which two flow streams—the lignin stock stream and the anti-solvent stream) enter a mixing chamber perpendicularly through thin tubing to form engineered colloidal particle cores. A third stream, the engineered colloidal particle cores exit the T-unit piece. Water acts as non-solvent reducing the solubility of the lignin molecules and aggregating them to form particles. In the mixing step, the lignin solution and the anti-solvent liquid streams are pumped at different rates into the T-unit piece with digitally controlled liquid pumps. The synthesis of the particles is anticipated to occur at the point of mixing, where the anti-solvent meets lignin-solvent solution in the T-unit piece. This semi-continuous flow system is able to formulate larger volumes of lignin particle suspensions and achieves decoupling of particle concentration and particle size.

The role of the key process variables including initial concentration of molecular organosolv lignin in the stock solution, the volumetric lignin stock flow rate, the volumetric anti-solvent flow rate, and anti-solvent volume was investigated. One process variable was systematically varied at a time, while the rest were kept constant. Particle size, polydispersity, and zeta-potential were measured by dynamic light scattering techniques. The results from these studies are presented in FIGS. 3, 4, 5, and 6. The data in FIG. 3 show that lignin particle size increases with increasing stock concentration. Two lignin stock concentrations, 1 wt % and 3 wt %, were studied in more detail and the results are presented in FIGS. 4, 5 and 6.

1.2 Mechanism of Formation of Engineered Colloidal Particles Made of Organosolv Lignin Biopolymer

In addition to characterizing the relationship between the process control variables and resulting particle size and other characteristics, the mechanism of particle formation was elucidated. This mechanism can be deduced from the data in FIG. 7. The lignin particle size was characterized in a sample taken from the reaction mixture every 60 seconds. The most important and somewhat unexpected feature of the data in FIG. 7A is that the particle size does not change as the reaction progresses. This means that particles forming upon mixing of lignin stock with anti-solvent in the T-unit piece do not experience particle growth or Ostwald ripening. This determines the uniformity of the particle sizes and low particle polydispersity in the system. Further, due to this particular mechanism of particle formation, a decoupling of particle size from particle concentration is possible. Addition of lignin stock to particle suspension results into the formation of more particles of the same size.

1.3 Stability of Engineered Colloidal Particles Made of Organosolv Lignin Biopolymer Over Time

The long-term stability of the particle solutions was evaluated after samples were kept at room temperature and particle parameters were measured after 1 week and after 6 months. These data including sample stability and product shelf life are shown in FIG. 8. All formulations were proven to be very stable in storage for at least 6 months, which is very promising for product development.

The morphology of the lignin particles was visualized with transmission electron microscopy shortly after preparation and 6 months later—FIG. 9. The particles are approximately spherical in shape and are mostly uniform in size which confirms the results from the dynamic light scattering measurements.

1.4 Functionalization of Engineered Colloidal Particles with Metal Ions

Having achieved scalable fabrication of colloidal lignin particles with controlled sizes, the next step is to load the particles with active ingredients. Copper (Cu′) ions were used as model actives that were attached to the lignin particles. Ionic copper has wide spectrum of anti-fungal and anti-bacterial activity and remains the most important fungicide in organic agriculture [13]. Simple mixing procedures to infuse lignin particles with copper ions was utilized. Because colloidal lignin particles have high surface area, the contact of the active ingredient with the pathogen will be enhanced. The large area of surface contact is expected to increase functional potency of copper ions. This results in better efficiency per unit active ingredient therefore reducing the amount of the active ingredient. The measured size and zeta-potential of colloidal lignin particles functionalized with copper ions are presented in FIG. 10.

1.5a Preparation and Characterization of Composite Colloid Particle Formulation Comprising Engineered Lignin Particles, Metal Ions and Bioadhesive Cationic Polyelectrolyte

To further optimize the delivery of the active ingredients, the metal ion modified lignin particles can be dispersed in a bio-adhesive polyelectrolyte solution. The cationic polyelectrolyte low molecular chitosan was utilized for this purpose. Chitosan is a natural linear polysaccharide produced by deacetylation of chitin from crab and shrimp shells. The presence of chitosan in the colloidal formulation has a dual function. First, these biopolymer molecules sterically stabilize the colloidal formulation and prevent it from aggregation. Second, the positively charged chitosan molecules have the capacity to promote their attachment and adhesion to surfaces such as plant foliage resulting in better surface coverage, which in turn is expected to contribute to more efficient and longer lasting field application. The measured size and zeta-potential of the colloidal lignin particle formulations are presented in FIGS. 11 and 12. Note that in the presence of chitosan lignin-copper colloidal particles ungergo a charge reversal, i.e., transition from negatively charged particles to positively charged colloidal particles,—FIG. 11C.

1.5b Preparation and Characterization of Composite Colloid Particle Formulation Comprising Engineered Lignin Particles, and Bioadhesive Cationic Polyelectrolyte

Preparation of composite colloidal particle formulations comprising engineered lignin particles in chitosan solution was accomplished as described in section 1.5a but without the presence of metal ions. Solutions of colloidal lignin particles were simply added to solution of low molecular weight chitosan in water. FIG. 12C documents a charge reversal from negative to positive upon addition of addition of engineered colloidal particles to the chitosan solution. The disease preventing- and treating-properties of these formulations are described in the sections below.

1.6 In Vitro Antimicrobial Testing

X. perforans is the dominant species causing bacterial spot disease [13]. Two X. perforans strains: 242 (18-013) which is a copper resistant strain and the copper sensitive strain 282 (18-003) were studied. For short-term storage and experiments, the bacteria were grown on nutrient agar (NA) at 28° C. Bacterial colonies were transferred to NA plates containing copper sulphate pentahydrate (CuSO₄.5H₂O) at 0.08 μmol/l and incubated for 24 h at 28° C. The anti-bacterial testing was conducted as described in Ref. [13].

1.6.1 Quantitative Antimicrobial Test on Copper-Sensitive Xanthomonas Perforans

In vitro, all lignin-based formulations demonstrated anti-bacterial efficacy against the copper sensitive strain—FIG. 13. All composite colloidal particle formulations at concentration 0.01 wt % completely inhibited bacterial growth after 1 h of incubation. As expected, Kocide 3000 adversely affected the growth of the copper sensitive strain 282 (18-003). Bacterial populations treated with Kocide 3000 were significantly reduced (P=0.05) after 1 h of incubation. Exposure beyond 1 h helped eliminate recurrent bacterial growth.

1.6.2 Quantitative Antimicrobial Tests on Copper-Tolerant Xanthomonas Perforans

In vitro, all lignin-based formulations demonstrated anti-bacterial efficacy against the copper resistant strain—FIG. 14. All composite colloidal particle formulations at concentration 0.01 wt % completely inhibited bacterial growth after 1 h of incubation. In contrast, copper-based Kocide 3000 bactericide at 0.1 wt % did not reduce bacterial population significantly (P=0.05) when compared to untreated control. Unlike Kocide 3000, all lignin-based formulations, lignin (0.01 wt %)-chitosan (0.01 wt %), lignin (0.01 wt %)-copper (0.01 wt %), and lignin (0.01 wt %)-copper (0.01 wt %)-chitosan (0.01 wt %) had the same effect on the copper sensitive and the copper resistant strains.

1.7. Field Testing of Composite Colloidal Particle Formulations

To evaluate the efficacy of the composite colloidal particle formulations against bacterial spot disease in the open field in tomato crops, one field trial was conducted with bacterial innoculation and one field trial was conducted without inoculation. Except for the inoculation step, in both trials agronomic and data analysis protocols were very similar. To evaluate the efficacy of the composite colloidal particle formulations against bacterial spot disease in the open field in pepper crops one field trial was conducted. This trial followed the protocols of the inoculated tomato trial.

Formulations tested in the field included lignin particles (0.01 wt %) with chitosan at (0.01 wt %) (Treatment D), lignin particles (0.01 wt %) with copper ions (0.01 wt %) and with chitosan (0.01 wt %) (Treatment E), and lignin particles (0.01 wt %) with copper ions (0.01 wt %) (Treatment F). Controls included water (Treatment A), Kocide 3000 at 0.064 wt % copper ions (Treatment B), and growers standard (Kocide 3000 at 0.064 wt %+Actigard at 0.5 oz+Manzate Pro-Stick at 0.18 wt %) (Treatment C). Treatments were applied weekly for 8 weeks using a CO2 pressurized backpack sprayer equipped with a hand-held boom and one, two, or three hollow cone nozzles (TXVS-26) at 45 psi. Spray rate (gal/acre) increased as plants grew: 45 gal/acre for three weeks, 55 gal/acre for three weeks, then 65 gal/acre for the final two weeks. In the first field trial plants 1, 8 and 15 in each row were spray-inoculated with copper-resistant strain of X. perforans bacterial suspension (5.10×8 CFU/ml). The severity of bacterial spot was evaluated weekly using a modified Horsfall-Barratt scale [13]. The area under the disease progress curve (AUDPC) was calculated using the method described in [13]. All statistical analysis were completed using IBM SPSS Statistics. AUDPC were examined using analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by pairwise comparison using the Least Significant Difference (LSD) method with a P value of 0.05.

The results from the field research are presented in FIG. 15, FIG. 16 and FIG. 17, respectively. The growers standard, Kocide 3000 and lignin particles with bio-adhesive chitosan (0.01 wt %) provided the best control of bacterial spot in the first trial. In the second trial lignin particles coated with chitosan (Treatment D), lignin particles with copper ions and with chitosan (Treatment E) provide best control of bacterial spot as measured by the area under the disease progress curve.

1.8. Elemental Analysis

Elemental analysis was conducted in tomato fruit that was harvested in the second field trial. Fruit were collected 7 days after last application of test composite colloidal particle formulation (lignin-chitosan formulation) and analyzed for elemental composition using Induction Coupled Plasma Optical Emission Spectroscopy (Thermo-Jarrell Ash, Franklin, Mass.) (14). As seen in Table 1 there were no significant differences for any of the elements when comparing elemental compositions for the active and control untreated sample.

TABLE 1
Elemental accumulation in tomato fruit collected from
fields treated with lignin-chitosan composite colloidal
particle formulation, compared to untreated control.
		Elemental Accumulation in
	Element	Fruit, mg/kg fresh weight	Significance
	ID	L-CS treated	Untreated Control	P = 0.5
	Al	0.37 ± 0.03	0.3 ± 0.02	NS
	B	0.62 ± 0.03	0.63 ± 0.04	NS
	Ca	67.19 ± 4.98	57.73 ± 3.6	NS
	Cu	0.32 ± 0.03	0.27 ± 0.02	NS
	Fe	2.17 ± 0.35	1.75 ± 0.1	NS
	K	1831.59 ± 59.77	1927.24 ± 75.05	NS
	Mg	83.07 ± 1.81	80.23 ± 3.85	NS
	Mn	1.3 ± 0.2	1.3 ± 0.22	NS
	Na	14.66 ± 1.01	17.42 ± 2.69	NS
	P	101.42 ± 5.06	126.66 ± 19.63	NS
	S	72.9 ± 3.96	77.65 ± 4.25	NS
	Si	0.65 ± 0.04	0.66 ± 0.09	NS
	Zn	0.88 ± 0.08	0.87 ± 0.07	NS

Claims

1. A method of creating a composite colloidal particle formulation comprising an engineered biodegradable particle core, the method comprising: a. Contacting an ethanol-based solvent containing dissolved biopolymer with an anti-solvent in a T-piece so as to form an engineered biodegradable particle core; andb. Dispersing the engineered biodegradable particle core in a bioadhesive polyelectrolyte solution.

2. The composite colloidal particle formulation produced by the method of claim 1.

3. The composite colloidal particle formulation of claim 2, wherein the engineered biodegradable particle core comprises a plant-derived biopolymer.

4. The composite colloidal particle formulation of claim 2, wherein the engineered biodegradable particle core comprises a lignin, a modified lignin, polysaccharide, modified polysaccharide or a combination thereof.

5. The composite colloidal particle formulation of claim 4, wherein the modified lignin is an unsulfonated or sulfonated lignin.

6. The composite colloidal particle formulation of claim 4, wherein the polysaccharide is cellulose, hemicellulose, lignocellulose, glyco-protein, or a combination thereof.

7. The composite colloidal particle formulation of claim 4, wherein the composite colloidal particle formulation comprises lignin at a concentration of at least 0.001 percent by weight.

8. The composite colloidal particle formulation of claim 2, wherein the composite colloidal particle formulation is cationic.

9. The composite colloidal particle formulation of claim 2, wherein the composite colloidal particle formulation comprises carbohydrates, polypeptides, lectins, proteins, or antibodies or other molecules or materials with affinity to microbes, viruses, seeds, or plant foliage.

10. The composite colloidal particle formulation of claim 2, wherein the composite colloidal particle formulation comprises chitosan at a concentration of at least 0.005 percent by weight.

11. The composite colloidal particle formulation of claim 2, wherein the particle has a diameter of about 10 nm to about 500 nm.

12. A coated article comprising a surface wherein at least a portion of the surface is coated with the composite colloidal particle system of claim 2.

13. A method for treating or preventing disease in a plant comprising applying to the plant the composite colloidal particle formulation of claim 2.

14. The method of treating or preventing disease in claim 13 wherein the disease is caused by a bacterial or fungal pathogen.

15. The method of claim 13 wherein the disease is bacterial spot.

16. A method of producing final formulation volumes of at least one liter, of a composite colloidal particle formulation comprising an engineered biodegradable particle core, the method comprising: a. Contacting an ethanol-based solvent containing dissolved biopolymer with an anti-solvent in a T-piece so as to form an engineered biopolymer particle core; andb. Dispersing the engineered biodegradable particle core in a bioadhesive polyelectrolyte solution.

17. The method of claim 13, wherein the plant is a member of the family Solanaceae.

18. The method of claim 13, wherein the plant is a member of the genus Capsicum.

19. The method of claim 13, wherein the plant is a member of the genus Lycopersicon.