Color adjustment method for a laser printer with multiple print resolutions

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6463227
  • Patent Number
    6,463,227
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, September 27, 2001
    22 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 8, 2002
    21 years ago
Abstract
An electrophotographic machine has at least two printing modes, with each printing mode having a respective printing density. A method of calibrating the electrophotographic machine includes depositing at least one toner patch on an image-bearing surface. The depositing is performed in a first of the printing modes. Light is emitted onto the at least one toner patch. An amount of light that is reflected off of the at least one toner patch is measured. At least one first electrophotographic condition for the first printing mode is adjusted dependent upon the measuring step. At least one second electrophotographic condition is adjusted for a second of the printing modes. The adjusting of the at least one second electrophotographic condition is dependent upon the measuring step.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




1. Field of the Invention




The present invention relates to multi-color electrophotographic machines, and, more particularly, to setting laser power and developer bias in multi-color electrophotographic machines.




2. Description of the Related Art




Toner patch sensors are used in color printers and copiers to monitor and control the amount of toner laid down by the electrophotographic process. Toner patch sensors reflect light off of a toner patch to determine how much toner was laid down during the electrophotographic process. The sensor's voltage signal from reading a toner patch is compared to the sensor signal from reading a bare surface to produce either a voltage difference or a ratio between the two signals.




Toner patch sensors are used in printers and copiers to monitor the toner density of unfused images and provide a means of controlling the print darkness. This information is then used to adjust laser power, developer bias, and other process conditions that affect image density. In color printers and copiers, the toner patch sensors are used to maintain the color balance and in some cases to modify the gamma correction or halftone linearization as the electrophotographic process changes with the environment and aging effects. Conventional reflection based toner sensors use a single light source to illuminate a test patch of toner and one or more photosensitive devices to detect the reflected light.




It is known to use the test images to both control solid area density and to apply a gradation correction (linearization) to the halftone printing curve. The automatic color adjustment process can be annoying to the printer user since the printer is unavailable for printing customer jobs for several minutes during this process. The test patches used in this process also consume toner, which reduces the cartridge yields and increases the need for waste toner storage.




It is known for a printer to have at least two modes of print resolution, such as 600 dots per inch (dpi) and 1200 dpi. The halftone screens used in each mode may use different dot sizes and screen angles. Because of this and the change in process speed, the gradation correction required for the 600 dpi mode halftones is different than the gradation correction needed for 1200 dpi halftones.

FIG. 1

is a plot of L* (lightness) values for a range of cyan halftone values (0-255) printed in 600 dpi mode and in 1200 dpi mode. A plot such as

FIG. 1

is known as the “halftone printing response curve”, “halftone response curve”, or “halftone printing curve”. The 1200 dpi halftones print noticeably lighter than the 600 dpi halftones for halftone levels of 20-50. Experiments have shown that the 1200 dpi halftone densities cannot reliably be predicted from the 600 dpi halftones because the correlation between the two halftone series varies with laser power and developer bias.




The correlation between the two modes will also vary with the frequency response of the particular laser printheads used in a given printer. To achieve the highest possible print quality, it then becomes necessary to perform additional reflective measurements on patches in 1200 dpi mode. This additional information can then be used to perform an accurate gradation correction on the 1200 dpi halftones. Because the 1200 dpi halftones are printed at a reduced speed, the total time required and waste toner generated by this double color adjustment procedure is even more annoying to the average user.




What is needed in the art is a method of providing accurate color adjustments that minimizes the time and toner used by the color adjustment procedure when there are multiple print resolution modes.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




The present invention provides a method of using a toner patch sensor to control the solid area density and provide information for linearizing the halftone response at 600 dpi. Additional patches are printed at 1200 dpi only as needed to allow the printer to correctly linearize the 1200 dpi halftone response. The 1200 dpi set points for laser power and developer bias are extrapolated from the 600 dpi set points.




The invention comprises, in one form thereof, an electrophotographic machine having at least two printing modes, with each printing mode having a respective printing density. A method of calibrating the electrophotographic machine includes depositing at least one toner patch on an image-bearing surface. The depositing is performed in a first of the printing modes. Light is emitted onto the at least one toner patch. An amount of light that is reflected off of the at least one toner patch is measured. At least one first electrophotographic condition for the first printing mode is adjusted dependent upon the measuring step. At least one second electrophotographic condition is adjusted for a second of the printing modes. The adjusting of the at least one second electrophotographic condition is dependent upon the measuring step.




The invention comprises, in another form thereof, a method of calibrating an electrophotographic machine having at least two printing modes. Each printing mode has a respective printing density. The method includes depositing at least one solid area toner patch on an image-bearing surface. The depositing is performed in a first of the printing modes. Light is emitted onto the at least one solid area toner patch. An amount of light that is reflected off of the at least one solid area toner patch is measured. At least one first electrophotographic condition for printing in the first printing mode at full density is adjusted dependent upon the measuring step. At least one first halftone patch is deposited on the image-bearing surface. The depositing is performed in the first printing mode and is dependent upon the at least one first electrophotographic condition. Light is emitted onto the at least one first halftone patch. An amount of light that is reflected off of the at least one first halftone patch is measured. A correction curve of gradation for printing in the first printing mode at less than full density is formed dependent upon the measured amount of light that is reflected off of the at least one first halftone patch. At least one second electrophotographic condition for printing in a second of the printing modes at full density is adjusted dependent upon the measured amount of light that is reflected off of the at least one solid area toner patch. At least one second halftone patch is deposited on the image-bearing surface. The depositing is performed in the second printing mode and is dependent upon the at least one second electrophotographic condition. Light is emitted onto the at least one second halftone patch. An amount of light that is reflected off of the at least one second halftone patch is measured. A correction curve of gradation for printing in the second printing mode at less than full density is formed dependent upon the measured amount of light that is reflected off of the at least one second halftone patch.




An advantage of the present invention is that color adjustments for two different printing modes can be made by printing toner test patches in only one of the two modes.




Another advantage is that a minimal amount of time is required to perform color adjustment for two different printing modes.




Yet another advantage is that a minimal amount of toner is required to perform color adjustment for two different printing modes.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




The above-mentioned and other features and advantages of this invention, and the manner of attaining them, will become more apparent and the invention will be better understood by reference to the following description of an embodiment of the invention taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:





FIG. 1

is a plot of L* (lightness) values for a range of halftone values (0-255) printed in 600 dpi mode and in 1200 dpi mode;





FIG. 2

is a side sectional view of a multicolor laser printer which can be used in conjunction with the method of the present invention; and





FIG. 3

is a schematic side view of the sensor arrangement of FIG.


1


.











Corresponding reference characters indicate corresponding parts throughout the several views. The exemplification set out herein illustrates one preferred embodiment of the invention, in one form, and such exemplification is not to be construed as limiting the scope of the invention in any manner.




DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION




One embodiment of a multicolor laser printer


10


(

FIG. 2

) that can be used in conjunction with the method of the present invention includes laser printheads


12


,


14


,


16


,


18


, a black toner cartridge


20


, a magenta toner cartridge


22


, a cyan toner cartridge


24


, a yellow toner cartridge


26


, photoconductive drums


28


,


30


,


32


,


34


, and an intermediate transfer member belt


36


.




Each of laser printheads


12


,


14


,


16


and


18


scans a respective laser beam


38


,


40


,


42


,


44


in a scan direction, perpendicular to the plane of

FIG. 2

, across a respective one of photoconductive drums


28


,


30


,


32


and


34


. Each of photoconductive drums


28


,


30


,


32


and


34


is negatively charged to approximately −900 volts and is subsequently discharged to a level of approximately −200 volts in the areas of its peripheral surface that are impinged by a respective one of laser beams


38


,


40


,


42


and


44


to form a latent image thereon made up of a plurality of dots, or pels. The photoconductive drum discharge is limited to about −200 volts because the conductive core is biased at −200 volts to repel toner at the beginning of printing when the photoconductive surface touching the developer roll has not yet been charged to −900 volts by the charge roll. During each scan of a laser beam across a photoconductive drum, each of photoconductive drums


28


,


30


,


32


and


34


is continuously rotated, clockwise in the embodiment shown, in a process direction indicated by direction arrow


46


. The scanning of laser beams


38


,


40


,


42


and


44


across the peripheral surfaces of the photoconductive drums is cyclically repeated, thereby discharging the areas of the peripheral surfaces on which the laser beams impinge.




The toner in each of toner cartridges


20


,


22


,


24


and


26


is negatively charged to approximately −600 volts. A thin layer of negatively charged toner is formed on the developer roll by means known to those skilled in the art. The developer roll is biased to approximately −600 volts. Thus, when the toner from cartridges


20


,


22


,


24


and


26


is brought into contact with a respective one of photoconductive drums


28


,


30


,


32


and


34


, the toner is attracted to and adheres to the portions of the peripheral surfaces of the drums that have been discharged to −200 volts by the laser beams. As belt


36


rotates in the direction indicated by arrow


48


, the toner from each of drums


28


,


30


,


32


and


34


is transferred to the outside surface of belt


36


. As a print medium, such as paper, travels along path


50


, the toner is transferred to the surface of the print medium in nip


54


. Transfer to paper is accomplished by using a positively biased transfer roll


55


below the paper in nip


54


.




A sensor arrangement


56


includes a light source


58


and a light detector


60


. Since belts are prone to warp and flutter as they move between rollers, sensor arrangement


56


can be located opposite a roller to stabilize the distance between sensor arrangement


56


and belt


36


. Light source


58


illuminates a toner test patch


62


(

FIG. 3

) on intermediate belt


36


. The light reflecting off of toner patch


62


is sensed by light detector


60


.




Test patch


62


is formed by depositing a solid area patch of black, cyan, magenta, or yellow toner on intermediate belt


36


. Cyan, magenta, and yellow toners are all fairly reflective powders at 880 nm, the wavelength used by toner patch sensor arrangement


56


. Toner patch


62


is formed using near maximum laser power and developer bias settings so as to produce substantial toner densities on the magenta, cyan or yellow photoconductive drum. When patch


62


to be read by patch sensor


56


is formed of cyan, magenta, or yellow toner, the gain setting of toner patch sensor


56


is reduced by a factor of eight from its black toner gain setting to avoid clipping. Otherwise, the signal level might exceed the dynamic range of the patch sensor circuitry. An engine controller


64


records and processes readings from sensor arrangement


56


.




Since the primary usage of printer


10


tends to be in 600 dpi mode, the 1200 dpi color adjustment measurements may not be required for most customer jobs. These measurements can be put off until they are actually required, i.e., when printer


10


has received a 1200 dpi job. In another embodiment, the 1200 dpi halftone patches are sampled immediately after the 600 dpi halftone samples. This avoids the need for a second “mini-calibration.”




The color adjustment procedure is divided into two parts as follows. In the first part, toner patch sensor


56


is used to monitor the image density of unfused solid area test patches on an image-bearing surface, such as intermediate belt


36


or a photoconductor. These solid area test patches are formed in the 600 dpi print mode. Information from these solid area patches is used to adjust electrophotographic conditions for printing in the 600 dpi mode at full density. The electrophotographic conditions can include the laser power, the charge voltage applied to photoconductive drums


28


,


30


,


32


,


34


, and the developer bias for each color. After the electrophotographic process conditions for full density have been set, a series of halftone test patches are sensed by toner patch sensor


56


to form a gradation curve of correction for the 600 dpi halftones of each color. That is, the amounts of toner required to be deposited on belt


36


to achieve various halftone density levels (i.e., levels at less than full density) for each color at 600 dpi are determined. This completes the first part of the calibration procedure. If there is no immediate need for 1200 dpi color adjustment information, printer


10


resumes processing and printing customer jobs.




When a new customer job is received that will require printer


10


to switch to the 1200 dpi mode, the laser power and developer bias settings required for printing at 1200 dpi at full density are extrapolated or otherwise calculated from the laser power and developer bias settings required for printing at 600 dpi at full density. For example, the laser power setting needed for the 1200 dpi full density printing mode, LPOW


1200


, may be linearly related to the laser power setting needed for the 600 dpi full density printing mode, LPOW


600


, by the equation




 LPOW


1200




=a




1


*


LPOW




600




+a




2


,




where a


1


and a


2


are empirically determined constants.




The developer bias voltage may be determined in a similar manner. For example, the developer bias voltage setting needed for the full density 1200 dpi printing mode, DevBias


1200


, may be linearly related to the developer bias voltage setting needed for the full density 600 dpi printing mode, DevBias


600


, by the equation








DevBias




1200




=b




1




*DevBias




600




+b




2


,






where b


1


and b


2


are empirically determined constants.




The 1200 dpi full density electrophotographic condition values are recorded in non-volatile memory


66


for future use. The test patches needed to characterize the 1200 dpi halftone response curve are then printed onto intermediate belt


36


and read by toner patch sensor


56


. The patch sensor data, i.e., the amount of light reflected off of the halftone test patches, is converted into anticipated L* or b* values for each of the test patches and this information is used to form the gradation curve of correction at 1200 dpi for each color. That is, the amounts of toner required to be deposited on belt


36


to achieve various halftone density levels (i.e., levels at less than full density) for each color at 1200 dpi are determined. When color laser printers change print modes from 600 dpi, which may print at twenty pages per minute, to 1200 dpi, which may print at ten pages per minute, the temperature of fuser


68


has to be reduced to avoid hot offset because of the longer dwell time in fuser nip


70


. Thus, a cool down time period is provided for fuser


68


. The additional halftone patches needed for the 1200 dpi gradation correction can be printed during this cooling time in order to partially or completely conceal the “downtime” from the user.




While this invention has been described as having a preferred design, the present invention can be further modified within the spirit and scope of this disclosure. This application is therefore intended to cover any variations, uses, or adaptations of the invention using its general principles. Further, this application is intended to cover such departures from the present disclosure as come within known or customary practice in the art to which this invention pertains and which fall within the limits of the appended claims.



Claims
  • 1. A method of calibrating an electrophotographic machine having at least two printing modes, each said printing mode having a respective printing density, said method comprising the steps of:depositing at least one solid area toner patch on an image-bearing surface, said depositing being performed in a first of the printing modes; emitting light onto said at least one solid area toner patch; measuring an amount of light that is reflected off of said at least one solid area toner patch; adjusting at least one first electrophotographic condition for printing in the first printing mode at full density, said adjusting being dependent upon said measuring step; depositing at least one first halftone patch on the image-bearing surface, said depositing being performed in the first printing mode and being dependent upon said at least one first electrophotographic condition; emitting light onto said at least one first halftone patch; measuring an amount of light that is reflected off of said at least one first halftone patch; forming a correction curve of gradation for printing in the first printing mode at less than full density, said forming being dependent upon said measured amount of light that is reflected off of said at least one first halftone patch; adjusting at least one second electrophotographic condition for printing in a second of the printing modes at full density, said adjusting being dependent upon said measured amount of light that is reflected off of said at least one solid area toner patch; depositing at least one second halftone patch on the image-bearing surface, said depositing being performed in the second printing mode and being dependent upon said at least one second electrophotographic condition; emitting light onto said at least one second halftone patch; measuring an amount of light that is reflected off of said at least one second halftone patch; and forming a correction curve of gradation for printing in the second printing mode at less than full density, said forming being dependent upon said measured amount of light that is reflected off of said at least one second halftone patch.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the printing density of the second printing mode is greater than the printing density of the first printing mode.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the printing density of the first printing mode is 600 dots per inch and the printing density of the second printing mode is 1200 dots per inch.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the image-bearing surface comprises an intermediate transfer member.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, wherein said at least one first electrophotographic condition for printing in the first printing mode at full density comprises at least one of laser power, charge voltage applied to a photoconductive drum, and developer bias.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein said forming step for printing in the first printing mode at less than full density comprises determining a desired amount of toner to be deposited on the image-bearing surface.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, wherein said at least one second electrophotographic condition for printing in the second printing mode at fill density comprises at least one of laser power and developer bias.
  • 8. The method of claim 1, comprising the further step of recording said at least one second electrophotographic condition for printing in the second printing mode at full density in a non-volatile memory.
  • 9. The method of claim 1, comprising the further step of calculating said at least one second electrophotographic condition for printing in the second printing mode at fall density from said at least one first electrophotographic condition for printing in the first printing mode at full density.
  • 10. The method of claim 1, wherein said forming step for printing in the second printing mode at less than full density comprises determining a desired amount of toner to be deposited on the image-bearing surface.
  • 11. The method of claim 1, comprising the further step of converting the measured light that is reflected off of said at least one second halftone patch into at least one of anticipated L* values and anticipated b* values for each said second halftone patch.
  • 12. The method of claim 1, wherein said step of depositing at least one second halftone patch is performed during a down time of a fuser.
  • 13. A method of calibrating an electrophotographic machine having at least two printing modes, each said printing mode having a respective printing density, said method comprising the steps of:depositing at least one toner patch on an image-bearing surface, said depositing being performed in a first of the printing modes; emitting light onto said at least one toner patch; measuring an amount of light that is reflected off of said at least one toner patch; adjusting at least one first electrophotographic condition for the first printing mode, said adjusting being dependent upon said measuring step; and adjusting at least one second electrophotographic condition for a second of the printing modes, said adjusting being dependent upon said measuring step.
  • 14. The method of claim 13, wherein the printing density of the second printing mode is greater than the printing density of the first printing mode.
  • 15. The method of claim 13, wherein the printing density of the first printing mode is 600 dots per inch and the printing density of the second printing mode is 1200 dots per inch.
  • 16. The method of claim 13, wherein the image-bearing surface comprises an intermediate transfer member.
  • 17. The method of claim 13, wherein said at least one first electrophotographic condition for the first printing mode comprises at least one of laser power, charge voltage applied to a photoconductive drum, and developer bias.
  • 18. The method of claim 13, wherein said at least one second electrophotographic condition for the second printing mode comprises at least one of laser power, charge voltage applied to a photoconductive drum, and developer bias.
  • 19. The method of claim 13, comprising the further step of recording said at least one second electrophotographic condition for printing in the second printing mode in a non-volatile memory.
  • 20. The method of claim 13, comprising the further step of calculating said at least one second electrophotographic condition for printing in the second printing mode from said at least one first electrophotographic condition for printing in the first printing mode.
  • 21. A method of calibrating an electrophotographic machine having at least two printing modes, each said printing mode having a respective printing density, said method comprising the steps of:depositing at least one first toner patch on an image-bearing surface, said depositing being performed in a first of the printing modes; emitting light onto said at least one first toner patch; measuring an amount of light that is reflected off of said at least one first toner patch; adjusting at least one first electrophotographic condition for the first printing mode, said adjusting being dependent upon said measuring step; adjusting at least one second electrophotographic condition for printing in a second of the printing modes at full density, said adjusting being dependent upon said measuring step; depositing at least one second toner patch on the image-bearing surface, said depositing being performed in the second printing mode and being dependent upon said at least one second electrophotographic condition; emitting light onto said at least one second toner patch; measuring an amount of light that is reflected off of said at least one second toner patch; and forming a correction curve of gradation for printing in the second printing mode at less than full density, said forming being dependent upon said measured amount of light that is reflected off of said at least one second toner patch.
  • 22. The method of claim 21, wherein the printing density of the second printing mode is greater than the printing density of the first printing mode.
  • 23. The method of claim 21, wherein the printing density of the first printing mode is 600 dots per inch and the printing density of the second printing mode is 1200 dots per inch.
  • 24. The method of claim 21, wherein the image-bearing surface comprises an intermediate transfer member.
  • 25. The method of claim 21, wherein said at least one first electrophotographic condition for printing in the first printing mode comprises at least one of laser power, charge voltage applied to a photoconductive drum, and developer bias.
  • 26. The method of claim 21, wherein said at least one second electrophotographic condition for printing in the second printing mode at full density comprises at least one of laser power and developer bias.
  • 27. The method of claim 21, comprising the further step of recording said at least one second electrophotographic condition for printing in the second printing mode at full density in a non-volatile memory.
  • 28. The method of claim 21, comprising the further step of calculating said at least one second electrophotographic condition for printing in the second printing mode at full density from said at least one first electrophotographic condition for printing in the first printing mode.
  • 29. The method of claim 21, wherein said forming step for printing in the second printing mode at less than full density comprises determining a desired amount of toner to be deposited on the image-bearing surface.
  • 30. The method of claim 21, comprising the further step of converting the measured light that is reflected off of said at least one second toner patch into at least one of anticipated L* values and anticipated b* values for each said second toner patch.
  • 31. The method of claim 21, wherein said step of depositing at least one second toner patch is performed during a down time of a fuser.
US Referenced Citations (48)
Number Name Date Kind
4106870 Kondo et al. Aug 1978 A
4647184 Russell et al. Mar 1987 A
4878082 Matsushita et al. Oct 1989 A
5148217 Almeter et al. Sep 1992 A
5148289 Nishiyama et al. Sep 1992 A
5194945 Kadowaki et al. Mar 1993 A
5227842 Hayashi et al. Jul 1993 A
5250988 Matsuura et al. Oct 1993 A
5257037 Haneda et al. Oct 1993 A
5315351 Matsushiro et al. May 1994 A
5386276 Swales et al. Jan 1995 A
5461462 Nakane et al. Oct 1995 A
5486901 Fukuchi et al. Jan 1996 A
5502550 Hori et al. Mar 1996 A
5512986 Toyomura et al. Apr 1996 A
5521677 Brewington et al. May 1996 A
5543896 Mestha Aug 1996 A
5559579 Gwaltney et al. Sep 1996 A
5568234 Shiba Oct 1996 A
5574544 Yoshino et al. Nov 1996 A
5678132 Shiba et al. Oct 1997 A
5694223 Katori et al. Dec 1997 A
5710958 Raj Jan 1998 A
5722003 Suzuki et al. Feb 1998 A
5722007 Ogata et al. Feb 1998 A
5726779 Kadowaki et al. Mar 1998 A
5748330 Wang et al. May 1998 A
5748857 Nakamura et al. May 1998 A
5777750 Takiyama et al. Jul 1998 A
5784667 Mestha et al. Jul 1998 A
5797064 Raj et al. Aug 1998 A
5819132 Hirobe Oct 1998 A
5826079 Boland et al. Oct 1998 A
5873011 Takemoto et al. Feb 1999 A
5895141 Budnik et al. Apr 1999 A
5903796 Budnik et al. May 1999 A
5933680 Nishimura Aug 1999 A
5937229 Walgrove et al. Aug 1999 A
5953554 Ohnishi et al. Sep 1999 A
5966561 Yamaguchi Oct 1999 A
5974276 Oogi Oct 1999 A
5987272 Maeda et al. Nov 1999 A
5995248 Katori et al. Nov 1999 A
6047146 Ito et al. Apr 2000 A
6064848 Haneda May 2000 A
6078401 Kanamori Jun 2000 A
6104891 Maebashi et al. Aug 2000 A
6124870 Morimoto Sep 2000 A
Foreign Referenced Citations (2)
Number Date Country
11-258871 Sep 1999 JP
2001-147563 May 2001 JP