The present application relates to improvements to display layouts, and specifically to improved color pixel arrangements and means of addressing used in displays.
The present state of the art of color single plane imaging matrix, for flat panel displays use the red-green-blue (RGB) color triad or a single color in a vertical stripe as shown in prior art FIG. 1. Prior art
Full color perception is produced in the eye by three-color receptor nerve cell types called cones. The three types are sensitive to different wavelengths of light: long, medium, and short (“red”, “green”, and “blue”, respectively). The relative density of the three differs significantly from one another. There are slightly more red receptors than green receptors. There are very few blue receptors compared to red or green receptors.
The human vision system processes the information detected by the eye in several perceptual channels: luminance, chromanance, and motion. Motion is only important for flicker threshold to the imaging system designer. The luminance channel takes the input from only the red and green receptors. It is “color blind”. It processes the information in such a manner that the contrast of edges is enhanced. The chromanance channel does not have edge contrast enhancement. Since the luminance channel uses and enhances every red and green receptor, the resolution of the luminance channel is several times higher than the chromanance channels. The blue receptor contribution to luminance perception is negligible. The luminance channel acts as a resolution band pass filter. Its peak response is at 35 cycles per degree (cycles/°). It limits the response at 0 cycles/° and at 50 cycles/° in the horizontal and vertical axis. This means that the luminance channel can only tell the relative brightness between two areas within the field of view. It cannot tell the absolute brightness. Further, if any detail is finer than 50 cycles/°, it simply blends together. The limit in the diagonal axes is significantly lower.
The chromanance channel is further subdivided into two sub-channels, to allow us to see full color. These channels are quite different from the luminance channel, acting as low pass filters. One can always tell what color an object is, no matter how big it is in our field of view. The red/green chromanance sub-channel resolution limit is at 8 cycles/°, while the yellow/blue chromanance sub-channel resolution limit is at 4 cycles/°. Thus, the error introduced by lowering the blue resolution by one octave will be barely noticeable by the most perceptive viewer, if at all, as experiments at Xerox and NASA, Ames Research Center (R. Martin, J. Gille, J. Larimer, Detectability of Reduced Blue Pixel Count in Projection Displays, SID Digest 1993) have demonstrated.
The luminance channel determines image details by analyzing the spatial frequency Fourier transform components. From signal theory, any given signal can be represented as the summation of a series of sine waves of varying amplitude and frequency. The process of teasing out, mathematically, these sine-wave-components of a given signal is called a Fourier Transform. The human vision system responds to these sine-wave-components in the two-dimensional image signal.
Color perception is influenced by a process called “assimilation” or the Von Bezold color blending effect. This is what allows separate color pixels (also known as sub-pixels or emitters) of a display to be perceived as a mixed color. This blending effect happens over a given angular distance in the field of view. Because of the relatively scarce blue receptors, this blending happens over a greater angle for blue than for red or green. This distance is approximately 0.25° for blue, while for red or green it is approximately 0.12°. At a viewing distance of twelve inches, 0.25° subtends 50 mils (1,270μ) on a display. Thus, if the blue pixel pitch is less than half (625μ) of this blending pitch, the colors will blend without loss of picture quality. This blending effect is directly related to the chromanance sub-channel resolution limits described above. Below the resolution limit, one sees separate colors, above the resolution limit, one sees the combined color.
Examining the conventional RGB stripe display in prior art
Thus, the prior art arrangement of three-color emitters is shown to be a poor match to human vision.
A system of addressing an array of color pixels for a flat panel display is disclosed. More particularly, the layout of column and row drive lines and transistors of three-color pixel element of spaced-apart emitters is disclosed.
The three-color pixel element has square design disposed at the origin of an X, Y coordinate system. Disposed at the center of the square is a blue emitter. Red emitters are disposed in the second and fourth quadrants not occupied by the blue emitter and green emitters are disposed in the first and third quadrants not occupied by the blue emitter. The blue emitter is square shaped, having corners aligned at the X and Y axes of the coordinate system, and the opposing pairs of red and green emitters are generally square shaped, having truncated inwardly-facing corners forming edges parallel to the sides of the blue emitter. The plurality of three-color pixel elements may be arranged in rows and columns to form a display. This array provides better perceived resolution and appearance of single full color displays by matching the human vision system.
Each emitter has a transistor and associated components or structures, such as capacitors. The column lines and row lines are doubled to allow for the transistors and associated structures of the red emitters and green emitters to be gathered together at the interstitial corners between the three-color pixel elements creating combined transistor groups. With the transistors grouped together, the combined transistors groups and the blue emitters both become less visible at 56 cycles/°, virtually vanishing from sight almost entirely.
Referring now to the figures, wherein like elements are numbered alike:
Those of ordinary skill in the art will realize that the following is illustrative only and not in any way limiting. Other embodiments will readily suggest themselves to such skilled persons.
The array is repeated across a panel to complete a device with a desired matrix resolution. The repeating three-color pixels form a “checker board” of alternating red 24 and green 26 emitters with blue emitters 22 distributed evenly across the device. However, the blue emitters 22 are at half the resolution of the red 24 and green 26 emitters.
One advantage of the three-color pixel element array is improved resolution of color displays. This occurs since only the red and green emitters contribute significantly to the perception of high resolution in the luminance channel. Thus, reducing the number of blue emitters and replacing some with red and green emitters improves resolution by more closely matching human vision.
Dividing the red and green emitters in half in the vertical axis to increase spatial addressability is an improvement over the conventional vertical single color stripe of the prior art. An alternating “checkerboard” of red and green emitters allows the Modulation Transfer Function (MTF), high spatial frequency resolution, to increase in both the horizontal and the vertical axes. A further advantage of this arrangement over prior art is the shape and location of the blue emitter.
In the prior art arrangement of
The grouping of the transistors and/or associated structures, such as capacitors, in the interstitial corners appears to be counter to good design practice, as understood in the prior art, since collecting them together makes them a bigger, and thus more visible dark spot, as shown in FIG. 6. However, in this circumstance these dark spots are exactly halfway between the blue emitter 22 in each three-color pixel element.
In this embodiment, the spatial frequency of the combined transistor groups and/or associated structures, 58 and the blue emitter 22 is doubled, pushing them above the 50 cycles/° resolution limit of the luminance channel of human vision. For example, in a 90 pixel per inch display panel the blue emitter pitch, without the grouped transistors, would create a 28 cycles/° luminance channel signal, both horizontally and vertically. In other words, the blue emitters may be visible as a texture on solid white areas of a display. However, they will not be as visible as the stripes visible in the prior art.
In contrast, with the transistors grouped together, the combined group transistors 58 and the blue emitters 22 both become less visible at 56 cycles/°, virtually vanishing from sight almost entirely. In other words, the grouping of the transistors and the blue emitters combine to produce a texture on solid white areas of a display too fine for the human visual system to see. In using this embodiment, the solid white areas become as smooth looking as a sheet of paper.
The grouping of the transistors, and/or associated structures, and placement of the blue emitters work together to match to human vision. In contrast to the prior art, which creates black lines with the placement of the blue emitters and transistor, the arrangement of the present invention removes this problem. In placing the transistors in accordance with the above arrangements, the transistors and blue emitters vanish from sight almost entirely providing a smooth looking display without a visible texture.
While the invention has been described with reference to an exemplary embodiment, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted for elements thereof without departing from the scope of the invention. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation or material to the teachings without departing from the essential scope thereof. Therefore, it is intended that the invention not be limited to the particular embodiment disclosed as the best mode contemplated for carrying out this invention, but that the invention will include all embodiments falling within the scope of the appended claims.
The present application claims the benefit of the date of the U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/290,103, entitled “Improvements to Color Flat Panel Display Sub-Pixel Arrangements and Layouts”, filed on May 9, 2001, which is incorporated herein in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3971065 | Bayer | Jul 1976 | A |
4353062 | Lorteije et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
4593978 | Mourey et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
4642619 | Togashi | Feb 1987 | A |
4651148 | Takeda et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4751535 | Myers | Jun 1988 | A |
4773737 | Yokono et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4786964 | Plummer et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4792728 | Chang et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4800375 | Silverstein et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4853592 | Strathman | Aug 1989 | A |
4874986 | Menn et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4886343 | Johnson | Dec 1989 | A |
4908609 | Stroomer | Mar 1990 | A |
4920409 | Yamagishi | Apr 1990 | A |
4965565 | Noguchi | Oct 1990 | A |
4966441 | Conner | Oct 1990 | A |
4967264 | Parulski | Oct 1990 | A |
5006840 | Hamada et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5052785 | Takimoto et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5113274 | Takahashi et al. | May 1992 | A |
5132674 | Bottorf | Jul 1992 | A |
5144288 | Hamada et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5184114 | Brown | Feb 1993 | A |
5233385 | Sampsell | Aug 1993 | A |
5311337 | McCartney, Jr. | May 1994 | A |
5315418 | Sprague | May 1994 | A |
5334996 | Tamagaki | Aug 1994 | A |
5341153 | Benzschawel | Aug 1994 | A |
5398066 | Martinez-Uriegas et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5436747 | Suzuki | Jul 1995 | A |
5461503 | Deffontaines et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5485293 | Robinder | Jan 1996 | A |
5535028 | Bae et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5541653 | Peters et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5559905 | Greggain et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5561460 | Katoh et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5563621 | Silsby | Oct 1996 | A |
5579027 | Sakurai et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5646702 | Akinwande et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5648793 | Chen | Jul 1997 | A |
5739802 | Mosier | Apr 1998 | A |
5754226 | Yamada et al. | May 1998 | A |
5767837 | Hara | Jun 1998 | A |
5792579 | Phillips | Aug 1998 | A |
5815101 | Fonte | Sep 1998 | A |
5821913 | Mamiya | Oct 1998 | A |
5870075 | Yamazaki et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5949496 | Kim | Sep 1999 | A |
5973664 | Badger | Oct 1999 | A |
6002446 | Eglit | Dec 1999 | A |
6008868 | Silverbrook | Dec 1999 | A |
6034666 | Kanai et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6037719 | Yap et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6038031 | Murphy | Mar 2000 | A |
6049626 | Kim | Apr 2000 | A |
6061533 | Kajiwara | May 2000 | A |
6064363 | Kwon | May 2000 | A |
6097367 | Kuriwaki et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6108122 | Ulrich et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6144352 | Matsuda et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6147664 | Hansen | Nov 2000 | A |
6160535 | Park | Dec 2000 | A |
6184853 | Hebiguchi et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6184903 | Omori | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6188385 | Hill et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6198507 | Ishigami | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6219025 | Hill et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6225967 | Hebiguchi | May 2001 | B1 |
6225973 | Hill et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6236390 | Hitchcock | May 2001 | B1 |
6239783 | Hill et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6243055 | Ferguson | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6243070 | Hill et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6271891 | Ogawa et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6299329 | Mui et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6326981 | Mori et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6327008 | Fujiyoshi | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6332030 | Manjunath | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6335719 | An et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6339434 | West et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6348929 | Acharya | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6360023 | Betrisey et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6377262 | Hitchcock et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6392717 | Kunzman | May 2002 | B1 |
6393145 | Betrisey et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
6396505 | Lui | May 2002 | B1 |
6441867 | Daly | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6453067 | Morgan et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6466618 | Messing et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6476416 | Ikeda | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6486923 | Maeshima et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6507350 | Wilson | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6542161 | Koyama et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6545653 | Takahara | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6570584 | Cok et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6590555 | Su et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6597411 | Selby et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6661429 | Phan | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6674430 | Kaufman | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6714206 | Martin et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6738204 | Chuang et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6750875 | Keely, Jr. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6804407 | Weldy | Oct 2004 | B2 |
20010017515 | Kusunoki et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010017607 | Kwon et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010040645 | Yamazaki | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020012071 | Sun | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020015110 | Elliott | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020017645 | Yamazaki | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020122160 | Kunzman | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020140831 | Hayashi | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020190648 | Bechtel et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030006978 | Fujiyoshi | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030011603 | Koyama | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030011613 | Booth, Jr. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030043567 | Hoelen et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030071826 | Goertzen | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030071943 | Choo et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030077000 | Blinn | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030218618 | Phan | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040213449 | Safaee-Rad | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040247070 | Ali | Dec 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
299 09 537 | Oct 1999 | DE |
199 23 527 | Nov 2000 | DE |
199-23-527 | Nov 2000 | DE |
199 23 527 | Nov 2000 | DE |
201 09 354 | Sep 2001 | DE |
0 158 366 | Oct 1985 | EP |
0 203 005 | Nov 1986 | EP |
0 322 106 | Jun 1989 | EP |
0 671650 | Sep 1995 | EP |
0 671 650 | Sep 1995 | EP |
0 812 114 | Dec 1997 | EP |
0 878 969 | Nov 1998 | EP |
0 899604 | Mar 1999 | EP |
1 261 014 | Nov 2002 | EP |
1 381 020 | Jan 2004 | EP |
2 133 912 | Aug 1984 | GB |
2 146 478 | Apr 1985 | GB |
60-107022 | Jun 1985 | JP |
02-000826 | Jan 1990 | JP |
03-78390 | Apr 1991 | JP |
03-036239 | May 1991 | JP |
06-102503 | Apr 1994 | JP |
02-983027 | Nov 1999 | JP |
WO 0021067 | Apr 2000 | WO |
WO 0042564 | Jul 2000 | WO |
WO 0042762 | Jul 2000 | WO |
WO 0045365 | Aug 2000 | WO |
WO 0065432 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO 0067196 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO 0110112 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO 0129817 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO 0152546 | Jul 2001 | WO |
WO 02059685 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO 02099557 | Dec 2002 | WO |
WO 02101644 | Dec 2002 | WO |
WO 03014819 | Feb 2003 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040046714 A1 | Mar 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60290103 | May 2001 | US |