The present teachings are directed to color management for electrostatographic printers and, more particularly, to a printer method and structure for simplifying the management and correction of printed colors.
In today's business and scientific world, color is essential as a component of communication. Color facilitates the sharing of knowledge, and as a result companies involved in the development of digital color print engines are continuously seeking to improve the image quality of such products. One of the elements that affects image quality is the ability to produce accurate and consistent colors on a printer over time.
Color profiling, color calibration, and software/firmware manipulation of printer color output, for example a printer using a cyan, magenta, yellow, black (CMYK) color model (i.e., color pallet), is typically required to produce an accurate or desired color output. For profiling, the color to be profiled may be printed using a color step wedge or color gradient that represents a plurality of halftones, and ranges from an input of “0” which is intended to print no halftone dots over the area to be printed to an input of “255” (in an 8-bit system) that is intended to print a solid color over the print area.
Colors on a printer tend to drift due to various factors such as color or viscosity variations in ink or toner, fluctuations in environmental conditions such as temperature and humidity, differences in the type of print media used, etc. When the drift is small, a print system may use a calibration procedure on each color halftone to correct the drift to achieve color consistency. This calibration to correct for small drift can be performed by re-calibrating each TRC for each color halftone.
For more significant drift where a larger separation interaction occurs, a new destination profile must be created for each halftone after calibration. To create a new destination profile, device-dependent color data from the printer is translated into a device-independent profile connection space (PCS) in accordance with international color consortium (ICC) specifications, for example using a lookup table. Translation may be performed by a color management module (CMM). Once the color values of the source device have been converted to PCS, the CMM may transform the color values from the PCS to a different device-dependent color space or destination profile, wherein each halftone includes a different destination profile.
Although profiling and calibration results in a high quality colorimetric print, running calibration and profiling multiple times leads to printer downtime and may be labor intensive in printers requiring manual calibration and profiling. For each color, the digital input must be compared with the digital output to create a new destination profile for each color. Further, it is difficult to track whether a specific halftone has up-to-date calibration before running a profiling procedure, particularly if the user intends to run only a subset of halftones. Some digital front ends (DFE) do not provide auto-switching mechanism and, in this case, the user is responsible for tracking which halftone is intended for the calibration and which profile should be associated therewith.
A simplified method for profiling and/or calibration of color printers would be desirable.
The following presents a simplified summary in order to provide a basic understanding of some aspects of one or more embodiments of the present teachings. This summary is not an extensive overview, nor is it intended to identify key or critical elements of the present teachings, nor to delineate the scope of the disclosure. Rather, its primary purpose is merely to present one or more concepts in simplified form as a prelude to the detailed description presented later.
In an embodiment, a method for color management for a color printer may include receiving a unified calibration tone reproduction curve (TRC) that comprises a translation which converts a plurality of digital input values to a plurality of corrected digital output values, applying the unified calibration TRC to a first destination profile for a first color halftone to color correct the first color halftone, and applying the unified calibration TRC to a second destination profile for a second color halftone that is different than the first color halftone to color correct the first color halftone.
In another embodiment, a non-transitory computer readable storage medium includes a program stored thereon to provide a color management system for correcting a color output for a color printer, wherein the program, when executed by the computer, performs a method including receiving a unified calibration tone reproduction curve (TRC) that comprises a translation which converts a plurality of digital input values to a plurality of corrected digital output values, applying the unified calibration TRC to a first destination profile for a first color halftone to color correct the first color halftone, and applying the unified calibration TRC to a second destination profile for a second color halftone that is different than the first color halftone to color correct the first color halftone.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate embodiments of the present teachings and together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the disclosure. In the figures:
It should be noted that some details of the FIGS. have been simplified and are drawn to facilitate understanding of the present teachings rather than to maintain strict structural accuracy, detail, and scale.
Reference will now be made in detail to exemplary embodiments of the present teachings, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. Wherever possible, the same reference numbers will be used throughout the drawings to refer to the same or like parts.
As used herein, unless otherwise specified, the word “printer” encompasses any apparatus that performs a print outputting function for any purpose, such as a digital copier, bookmaking machine, facsimile machine, a multi-function machine, electrostatographic device, etc.
As discussed above, colors on a printer tend to drift due to various factors such as color variations or ink viscosity variations in ink or toner, fluctuations in environmental conditions such as temperature and humidity, differences in the type of print media used, etc. When the drift is small, a calibration procedure may be performed on each color halftone to correct the drift to achieve color consistency. Using conventional methods, a customized linear color curve is produced for each color halftone. When a color halftone is printed, the customized linear color curve is used as a calibration TRC for that specific color halftone, and each color halftone uses its own customized calibration TRC. When printer drift requires recalibration, each color halftone must be printed and measured to create a plurality of new calibration TRC's, one for each color halftone.
In an embodiment of the present teachings, a simplified color profiling process may be performed that reduces the time and labor involved in profiling compared to some prior color profiling methods. In an embodiment, it may be assumed that the drift for each color results from the same source, for example environmental factors, and thus the resulting color drift will be similar for each color in the color pallet. Thus, to correct each color, a single unified TRC may be created based on a single default halftone or a single average linear color curve as described below, thereby eliminating the need to compare digital inputs and digital outputs for every color halftone in the color pallet. This simplified workflow eliminates the need for separate calibrations, one for each of a plurality of color halftones.
A system in accordance with the present teachings may thus include a print engine that utilizes process control to provide similar raw response between different halftones. A unified calibration TRC is created that may be based on the default (i.e., primary) color halftone and applied to all color halftones during printing. Thus unified calibration TRC is then received by the printer and applied to the destination profile for each color halftone during printing. During RIP, the unified calibration TRC is used for all halftone selections, while an automatic switching mechanism selects the corresponding destination profile based on the halftone selection. With small printer drift, a new calibration performed only on the primary halftone with the existing destination profiles will bring all halftone results back through the color management system. When re-profiling is required, user only needs to perform one calibration (performed on the primary halftone or average linear color curve) procedure prior to the profiling procedure for any halftone.
An embodiment of the present teachings of a method for color management 20 for a printer (i.e., source device) is depicted in the block diagram of
Once the color values of the source device have been converted to PCS 24, the CMM may transform the color values from the PCS 24 to a different device-dependent color space or destination profile 26A-26C, wherein each halftone includes a different destination profile 26.
Next, in contrast to some conventional color management processes that use a different calibration TRC for each halftone, an embodiment of the present teachings uses a single unified calibration TRC 28 for every color halftone. The unified calibration TRC 28 is used for correction of every color halftone with input from the destination profile 26A-26C for each color halftone, which is then passed to a print engine 30 for printing.
When a small drift occurs, the unified calibration TRC is recalibrated for the primary color halftone, then applied to the every color halftone during printing. Thus only one default color halftone requires calibration to create the unified calibration TRC 28, which is applied to correct all color halftones. For larger drifts or changes, the destination profiles themselves will require recalculation in accordance with known techniques.
The unified calibration TRC 28 may be developed for a specific printer using any method. For example, in one method 40 as depicted in the flow chart of
In another embodiment, the unified calibration TRC 28 may be created using an initial measurement of the average of all the halftones. In this embodiment 60 as depicted in
While the exemplary embodiments are illustrated and described above as a series of acts or events, it will be appreciated that the present teachings are not limited by the illustrated ordering of such acts or events. For example, some acts may occur in different orders and/or concurrently with other acts or events apart from those illustrated and/or described herein, in accordance with the present teachings. In addition, not all illustrated steps may be required to implement a methodology in accordance with the present teachings, and other steps can be added or modified. As another example, the averaging of the plurality of linear color curves 64 may be computed in a weighted formula.
When a larger printer drift occurs that cannot be resolved through recalibration of the unified calibration TRC 28, new destination profiles 26 for each color halftone must be created, for example in accordance with known techniques. However, the calibration step for a specific halftone, before each creation of the destination profile, is only needed one time, since the unified TRC has already been created, which will then be correlated with the newly generated destination profiles.
In general, different color characteristics from a printing device may be caused not only from using different halftones, but also from printing on different print media as well as other factors. It will be understood that the present teachings cover all such variations and are not limited to halftone variations, which will result in using different calibration TRCs and different destination profiles.
Certain embodiments of the present teachings may be performed as a computer program 300 internal and/or external to a color printer 302 to provide a color management system 304 for correcting a color output by the color printer 302 to, for example, a print medium 306 as depicted in
Notwithstanding that the numerical ranges and parameters setting forth the broad scope of the present teachings are approximations, the numerical values set forth in the specific examples are reported as precisely as possible. Any numerical value, however, inherently contains certain errors necessarily resulting from the standard deviation found in their respective testing measurements. Moreover, all ranges disclosed herein are to be understood to encompass any and all sub-ranges subsumed therein. For example, a range of “less than 10” can include any and all sub-ranges between (and including) the minimum value of zero and the maximum value of 10, that is, any and all sub-ranges having a minimum value of equal to or greater than zero and a maximum value of equal to or less than 10, e.g., 1 to 5. In certain cases, the numerical values as stated for the parameter can take on negative values. In this case, the example value of range stated as “less than 10” can assume negative values, e.g. −1, −2, −3, −10, −20, −30, etc.
While the present teachings have been illustrated with respect to one or more implementations, alterations and/or modifications can be made to the illustrated examples without departing from the spirit and scope of the appended claims. For example, it will be appreciated that while the process is described as a series of acts or events, the present teachings are not limited by the ordering of such acts or events. Some acts may occur in different orders and/or concurrently with other acts or events apart from those described herein. Also, not all process stages may be required to implement a methodology in accordance with one or more aspects or embodiments of the present teachings. It will be appreciated that structural components and/or processing stages can be added or existing structural components and/or processing stages can be removed or modified. Further, one or more of the acts depicted herein may be carried out in one or more separate acts and/or phases. Furthermore, to the extent that the terms “including,” “includes,” “having,” “has,” “with,” or variants thereof are used in either the detailed description and the claims, such terms are intended to be inclusive in a manner similar to the term “comprising.” The term “at least one of” is used to mean one or more of the listed items can be selected. Further, in the discussion and claims herein, the term “on” used with respect to two materials, one “on” the other, means at least some contact between the materials, while “over” means the materials are in proximity, but possibly with one or more additional intervening materials such that contact is possible but not required. Neither “on” nor “over” implies any directionality as used herein. The term “about” indicates that the value listed may be somewhat altered, as long as the alteration does not result in nonconformance of the process or structure to the illustrated embodiment. Finally, “exemplary” indicates the description is used as an example, rather than implying that it is an ideal. Other embodiments of the present teachings will be apparent to those skilled in the art from consideration of the specification and practice of the disclosure herein. It is intended that the specification and examples be considered as exemplary only, with a true scope and spirit of the present teachings being indicated by the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
7864387 | Chen et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
8274706 | Monga et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8339690 | Sivan et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
20070177231 | Wang et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20120133991 | Monga et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20140139883 | Hashizume | May 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160048746 A1 | Feb 2016 | US |