The present invention relates generally to image displays.
Image displays include emissive displays, such as phosphor displays used in cathode tube-based television and computer monitors, and transmissive displays, such as projection displays used for large screen TVs. An emissive display works by emitting visible light from pixels that are excited by, e.g., electron beams or fluorescent lamps. In the case of conventional electron beam-based displays, the electron beam is scanned across the pixels as appropriate to excite the pixels to produce a demanded image. In the case of fluorescent lamp-based displays such as plasma displays, ultraviolet light from a gas discharge is directed to appropriate pixels that are physically shielded from each other, with the pixel illumination pattern necessary to produce the demanded image not being established by scanning the UV light, which is simply a discharge from the lamp, but by appropriately blocking the UV light to impinge only on the desired pixels. Both of the above-mentioned emissive displays require the presence of a vacuum within the device, which can complicate manufacturing and raise costs.
Because the weight of some emissive displays becomes infeasibly large in the case of large screen displays, e.g., displays having sizes of 40″-60″ or more, the above-mentioned transmissive displays have been provided, an example of which is the projection display. A projection display works by projecting pixellated light from a relatively small source onto a relatively large projector, which “transmits” the light toward the viewers.
As recognized herein, while effective, large screen projection-type displays suffer from the drawback of relatively low image quality, compared to the image quality afforded by a smaller emissive display. On the other hand, current emissive display technology, as noted above, cannot easily be used to establish large screen displays owing to weight and other practical restrictions. Nevertheless, the present invention recognizes that it would be desirable to provide a large screen emissive display to overcome the image quality drawback of many large transmissive displays.
A color separator configured for an image display apparatus includes a substrate having phosphor-based red, green, and blue subpixels, and at least one refraction layer covering the subpixels. A mask layer is on the refraction layer, with the mask layer being configured to shield the blue and green subpixels from a first beam, shield the red and green subpixels from a second beam, and shield the red and blue subpixels from a third beam.
In a preferred embodiment, the display is a large screen phosphor display that operates at atmospheric pressure. The mask can be ink-jet printed onto the refraction layer. The preferred mask defines plural excitation light apertures that in turn define variable pitches established based on the locations of the respective excitation light apertures relative to the display.
In another aspect, a separator for producing a demanded image includes a mask that is juxtaposed with a phosphor display. The mask has apertures defining pitches between adjacent apertures. At least one pitch is different from another pitch.
The details of the present invention, both as to its structure and operation, can best be understood in reference to the accompanying drawings, in which like reference numerals refer to like parts, and in which:
Referring initially to
As can be appreciated in reference to
Explaining
The three beams 14 then propagate toward respective light valves 22. In the preferred embodiment, the light valves 22 are grating light valves (GLVs). In non-limiting examples, the GLVs may be those disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,311,360, incorporated herein by reference, or in [insert Sony patents here].
Accordingly, the light valves 22 reflect their respective beams 14 in accordance with light valve principles known in the art. Specifically, each light valve 22 can include a one-dimensional row of movable mirrors which can reflect light. In a particularly preferred, non-limiting embodiment, six adjacent mirrors per subpixel are used. A processor 24 is operably engaged with the light valves 22 to cause each valve 22 to modulate its respective beam 14 in accordance with a demanded image received from, e.g., a television tuner, a computer, or other video source. That is, the mirrors of the light valves 22 are moved as appropriate to reflect or not the respective beam 14, to thereby establish the position of the beam 14 in the dimension defined by the light valves 22 for any given frame of the demanded image.
Thus, the beams 14 are essentially scanned in one dimension in accordance with the demanded image. To achieve the requisite two-dimensional scan, each beam 14 propagates from its respective light valve 22 to a respective scanning mirror 26, each of which oscillates about its axis as driven by a respective motor 28 in a dimension that is orthogonal to the dimension of the light valves 22. The scanning mirrors 26 need not be controlled in accordance with the demanded image; rather, only the light valves 22 need be controlled to produce the demanded image, with the processor 24 taking account of the orthogonal scanning of the beams 14 provided by the scanning mirrors 26.
If desired, a mask 30 can be interposed between the scanning mirrors 26 and the display 12 to establish a light barrier between adjacent pixels. The mask 30 defines a two-dimensional grid of differently-sized excitation light apertures 32. The mask 30 can include an opaque substrate and the apertures 32 can be established by openings in the substrate. Alternatively, the mask 30 can include a transparent substrate and the apertures can be established by ink-jet printing an opaque pattern on the substrate, with non-printed portions of the substrate establishing the apertures.
As best shown in
In any case, as shown in
To ensure that the three beams impinge on only their intended subpixels, a color selection mask layer 48 can be juxtaposed with the refracting layer 46 for shielding the blue and green subpixels from the first beam, shielding the red and green subpixels from the second beam, and shielding the red and blue subpixels from the third beam. The color selection mask layer 48 can be deposited onto the refracting later 46 as one or more thin films by, e.g., ink jet printing the film onto the refracting layer 46. Like the mask 30 shown in
While the particular COLOR SEPARATOR FOR EMISSIVE DISPLAY as herein shown and described in detail is fully capable of attaining the above-described objects of the invention, it is to be understood that it is the presently preferred embodiment of the present invention and is thus representative of the subject matter which is broadly contemplated by the present invention, that the scope of the present invention fully encompasses other embodiments which may become obvious to those skilled in the art, and that the scope of the present invention is accordingly to be limited by nothing other than the appended claims, in which reference to an element in the singular is not intended to mean “one and only one” unless explicitly so stated, but rather “one or more”. All structural and functional equivalents to the elements of the above-described preferred embodiment that are known or later come to be known to those of ordinary skill in the art are expressly incorporated herein by reference and are intended to be encompassed by the present claims. Moreover, it is not necessary for a device or method to address each and every problem sought to be solved by the present invention, for it to be encompassed by the present claims. Furthermore, no element, component, or method step in the present disclosure is intended to be dedicated to the public regardless of whether the element, component, or method step is explicitly recited in the claims. No claim element herein is to be construed under the provisions of 35 U.S.C. §112, sixth paragraph, unless the element is expressly recited using the phrase “means for” or, in the case of a method claim, the element is recited as a “step” instead of an “act”.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 10/112,841, 10/112,839, and 10/112,837, all filed Mar. 29, 2002.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4794299 | Chiodi et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4931689 | Van Uden | Jun 1990 | A |
5079544 | DeMond et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5473396 | Okajima et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5652666 | Florence et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5774174 | Hardie | Jun 1998 | A |
6088102 | Manhart | Jul 2000 | A |
6157119 | Hung et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6157120 | Tseng et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6172797 | Huibers | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6211614 | Katayama et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6222514 | DeLuca | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6313894 | Sekine et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6370019 | Matthies et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6407851 | Islam et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6476848 | Kowarz et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6480634 | Corrigan | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6498431 | Katayama et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6552855 | Kowarz et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6577429 | Kurtz et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
20020033677 | Okada | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020122260 | Okazaki et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030048390 | Welch et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030086179 | Kowarz et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030132699 | Yamaguchi et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030174255 | Lee et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030184209 | Russ et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030184531 | Morikawa et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030184842 | Morikawa et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030185968 | Russ et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030184210 A1 | Oct 2003 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10112841 | Mar 2002 | US |
Child | 10114303 | US | |
Parent | 10112839 | Mar 2002 | US |
Child | 10112841 | US | |
Parent | 10112837 | Mar 2002 | US |
Child | 10112839 | US |