1. Field of Endeavor
The present invention relates to explosives and more particularly to testing for the presence of explosives.
2. State of Technology
U.S. Pat. No. 5,638,166 for an apparatus and method for rapid detection of explosives residue from the deflagration signature thereof issued Jun. 10, 1997 to Herbert O. Funsten and David J. McComas and assigned to The Regents of the University of California provides the following state of the art information, “Explosives are a core component of nuclear, biological, chemical and conventional weapons, as well as of terrorist devices such as car, luggage, and letter bombs. Current methods for detecting the presence of explosives include vapor detection, bulk detection, and tagging. However, these methods have significant difficulties dependent upon the nature of the signature that is detected. See, Fetterolf et al., Portable Instrumentation: New Weapons in the War Against Drugs and Terrorism,” Proc. SPIE 2092 (1993) 40, Yinon and Zitrin, in Modern Methods and Applications in Analysis of Explosions, (Wiley, New York, 1993) Chap. 6; and references therein. Vapor detection is achieved using trained animals, gas chromatography, ion mobility mass spectrometry, and bioluminescence, as examples. All of these techniques suffer from the inherently low vapor pressures of most explosives. Bulk detection of explosives may be performed using x-ray imaging which cannot detect the explosives themselves, but rather detects metallic device components. Another method for bulk detection involves using energetic x-rays to activate nitrogen atoms in the explosives, thereby generating positrons which are detected. This technique requires an x-ray generator and a minimum of several hundred grams of explosives. Bulk detection is also accomplished using thermal neutron activation which requires a source of neutrons and a .gamma.-radiation detector. Thus, bulk detection is not sensitive to trace quantities of explosives and requires large, expensive instrumentation. Tagging requires that all explosives be tagged with, for example, an easily detected vapor. However, since tagging is not mandatory in the United States, this procedure is clearly not reliable. It turns out that there are no technologies for performing accurate, real-time (<6 sec) detection and analysis of trace explosives in situ. Only trained dogs can achieve this goal.
It is known that surfaces in contact with explosives (for example, during storage, handling, or device fabrication) will readily become contaminated with explosive particulates as a result of their inherent stickiness. This phenomenon is illustrated in studies that show large persistence of explosives on hands, even after several washings (J. D. Twibell et al., “Transfer of Nitroglycerine to Hands During Contact with Commercial Explosives,” J. Forensic Science 27 (1982) 783; J. D. Twibell et al., “The Persistence of Military Explosives on Hands,” J. Forensic Science 29 (1984) 284). Furthermore, cross contamination in which a secondary surface is contaminated by contact with a contaminated primary surface can also readily occur. For example, a measurable amount of ammonium nitrate (AN) residue has been found on the lease documents for a rental truck, and significant amounts of the explosives PETN (pentaerythritol tetranitrate) and/or AN have been found on clothing and inside vehicles of suspects in two well-publicized bombings. Therefore, explosive residue will likely persist in large amounts on the explosive packaging and environs, as well as on the individuals involved in building the explosive device, which can provide an avenue for detection of the presence of explosives.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,679,584 for a method for chemical detection issued Oct. 2, 1997 to Daryl Sunny Mileaf and Noe Esau Rodriquez, II provides the following state of the art information, “a method for detecting a target substance which includes collecting a substance sample; introducing the substance sample into a substance card having at least one preselected reagent responsive to the presence of the target substance and having a light-transmissive chamber; and inserting the substance card into a substance detector device having a photosensor and adapted to receive the substance card. Once the substance detector card has been inserted into the substance detector, the method continues by mixing the substance sample with the preselected reagents for a preselected mixing period, thus producing a measurand having a target substance reaction.”
U.S. Pat. No. 6,470,730 for a dry transfer method for the preparation of explosives test samples issued Oct. 29, 2002 to Robert T. Chamberlain and assigned to The United States of America as represented by the Secretary of Transportation provides the following state of the art information, “method of preparing samples for testing explosive and drug detectors of the type that search for particles in air. A liquid containing the substance of interest is placed on a flexible Teflon® surface and allowed to dry, then the Teflon® surface is rubbed onto an item that is to be tested for the presence of the substance of interest. The particles of the substance of interest are transferred to the item but are readily picked up by an air stream or other sampling device and carried into the detector.”
Features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following description. Applicants are providing this description, which includes drawings and examples of specific embodiments, to give a broad representation of the invention. Various changes and modifications within the spirit and scope of the invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from this description and by practice of the invention. The scope of the invention is not intended to be limited to the particular forms disclosed and the invention covers all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the claims.
The present invention provides a tester for testing for explosives. The tester comprises a body, a lateral flow swab unit operably connected to the body, an explosives detecting reagent contained in the body, and a dispenser operatively connected to the body and the lateral flow swab unit. The dispenser selectively allows the explosives detecting reagent to be delivered to the lateral flow swab unit. In one embodiment the lateral flow swab unit comprises a microporous membrane swab. Operation of the tester starts by the dispenser allowing the explosives detecting reagent to be delivered to the lateral flow swab unit. The swab unit is swiped across the surface of to be tested. Any suspect substance will be picked up by the swab surface. If the swab surface becomes colored, the test is positive for explosives.
The tester of the present invention provides a simple, chemical, field test to provide a rapid screen for the presence of a broad range of explosive residues. The tester is fast, low-cost, very easy to use, and provides a very low rate of false positives. The tester provides a fast, sensitive, low-cost, very easy to implement system for testing the suspected packages. The tester is inexpensive and disposable. A large number of common military and industrial explosives can be easily detected such as HMX, RDX, NG, TATB, Tetryl, PETN, TNT, DNT, TNB, DNB and NC. The tester is small enough that a number of them can fit in a pocket or brief case.
The invention is susceptible to modifications and alternative forms. Specific embodiments are shown by way of example. It is to be understood that the invention is not limited to the particular forms disclosed. The invention covers all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the claims.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated into and constitute a part of the specification, illustrate specific embodiments of the invention and, together with the general description of the invention given above, and the detailed description of the specific embodiments, serve to explain the principles of the invention.
Referring now to the drawings, to the following detailed description, and to incorporated materials, detailed information about the invention is provided including the description of specific embodiments. The detailed description serves to explain the principles of the invention. The invention is susceptible to modifications and alternative forms. The invention is not limited to the particular forms disclosed. The invention covers all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the claims.
The ability to identify unknown explosives in the field is of utmost importance to the military, law enforcement and Homeland security forces worldwide. There have been many reports of the use of spot tests for the identification of explosives, some of which are listed below. They have been used in combination with thin-layer chromatography and in forensic analysis. There are some commercial companies (Mistral, Securesearch, Duram products) who have produced explosives identification kits similar to the one Applicants propose. They have incorporated similar color reagents and have been used by the military and law-enforcement agencies. Ex-spray and Duram products are probably the best commercial test kits produced thus far. They allow the identification of nitroaromatics, nitramines, ammonium nitrate, and recently the potassium chlorate-based explosives. Their systems are available as spray kits or solution-drop kits. The Duram product will also identify the peroxide explosives. Another company produced a swab kit that incorporates either diphenylamine or Wurster's salt that turns blue when it comes in contact with nitramines, oxidizers and nitrate esters. It is easy to use but is non-specific and would give a significant number of false positives.
Referring to the drawings, and in particular to
The tester 100 provides a small, disposable, one use system. The tester 100 uses a simple and rapid method of operation. The structure of the tester 100 includes a body 101. The body 101 is made of a squeezable material such as plastic. An ampoule 102 containing an explosives detecting reagent 103 is located within the squeezable body 101. An outlet 104 in the body 101 allows the explosives detecting reagent 103 to be dispensed for detecting explosives as will be subsequently described. A lateral flow swab unit 105 is operably positioned in the outlet 104. The ampoule 102 containing the explosives detecting reagent 103 is a breakable ampoule and acts as a dispenser for selectively allowing the explosives detecting reagent 103 to be delivered to the lateral flow swab unit 105.
The lateral flow swab unit 105 comprises a microporous membrane material that provides migration of the explosives detecting reagent 103 from the ampoule 102 and the body 101. Lateral flow membrane materials are known for their use in other fields. Lateral flow membrane material is known for use as blotting techniques, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) testing, and lateral-flow immunochromatographic tests. The lateral flow swab unit 105 comprises polyethylene spheres fused into a lateral flow membrane. The lateral flow swab unit 105 is a Porex Lateral-Flo Membrane. Applicants experimentally determined that the properties of the lateral flow swab unit 105 make it an ideal swipe material for the tester 100. The lateral flow membrane 105 is chemical resistant, withstands heat as high as 130° C., is durable, is inexpensive, can be formed in any size, and concentrates suspect materials along the solvent front 109 making colorimetric detection limits. The lateral flow swab unit 105 includes a surface area 106 swipe for sample collection.
Referring now to
Referring to
The operation of the tester 100 starts by breaking the ampoule 102 containing the explosives detecting reagent 103 located within the squeezable body 101. This is accomplished by squeezing the body 101 and breaking the ampoule 102. The ampoule 102 acts as a dispenser allowing the explosives detecting reagent 103 to be delivered to the lateral flow swab unit 105 and the swab surface 106. The swab surface 106 is swiped across the surface of the suitcase 108. Any suspect substance will be picked up by the swab surface 106. If the swab surface 106 becomes colored, the test is positive for explosives.
The tester 100 provides a small, disposable, one use system. The tester 100 uses a simple and rapid method of operation. The tester 100 is an inexpensive and disposable device. The tester 100 can be used anywhere as a primary screening tool by non-technical personnel to determine whether a surface contains explosives. The tester 100 allows identification of explosives. This tester can be used by first responders, military, law enforcement, Homeland Security, and others.
Referring now to
The operation of the tester 500 starts by breaking the breakable valve 502 releasing the explosives detecting reagent 503 located within the body 501. This is accomplished by squeezing the body 501 and breaking the breakable valve 502. This allows the explosives detecting reagent 503 to be delivered to the lateral flow swab unit 505 and the swab surface 506. The swab surface 506 is swiped across the surface of the area to be tested. Any suspect substance will be picked up by the swab surface 506. If the swab surface 506 becomes colored, the test is positive for explosives.
The tester 500 provides a small, disposable, one use system. The tester 500 uses a simple and rapid method of operation. The tester 500 is an inexpensive and disposable device. The tester 500 can be used anywhere as a primary screening tool by non-technical personnel to determine whether a surface contains explosives. The tester 500 was developed to allow identification of explosives. This tester may be used by first responders, military, law enforcement and Homeland Security.
Referring now to
The operation of the tester 600 starts by opening valve 602 releasing the explosives detecting reagent 603 located within the body 601. This is accomplished by squeezing the body 601 and manipulating the valve 602 to open it. Simple valves are well known and may be used for the valve 502. Opening the valve 505 allows the explosives detecting reagent 603 to be delivered to the lateral flow swab unit 605 and the swab surface 606. The swab surface 606 is swiped across the surface of the area to be tested. Any suspect substance will be picked up by the swab surface 606. If the swab surface 606 becomes colored, the test is positive for explosives.
The tester 600 provides a small, disposable, one use system. The tester 600 uses a simple and rapid method of operation. The tester 600 is an inexpensive and disposable device. The tester 600 can be used anywhere as a primary screening tool by non-technical personnel to determine whether a surface contains explosives. The tester 600 was developed to allow identification of explosives. This tester may be of used by first responders, military, law enforcement and Homeland Security.
Referring now to
The lateral flow swab unit 701 provides migration of the explosives detecting reagent from the body. This is illustrated by the arrows 703 which show the explosives detecting reagent wicking along the outside surface of the lateral flow swab unit 701. The explosives detecting reagent wicks along the outside surface of the lateral flow swab unit 701 to the surface 702 of the lateral flow swab unit 701. The surface area 702 provides a swipe area for sample collection. The explosives detecting reagent is shown wicking onto the surface 702 as illustrated by the arrows 704. The explosives detecting reagent is delivered to the lateral flow swab unit surface 702. The swab surface 702 is swiped across the surface of the area to be tested. Any suspect substance will be picked up by the swab surface 702. Any suspect matter is concentrated as illustrated at 705 which improves the detection capability of the tester. If the swab surface 702 becomes colored, the test is positive for explosives.
Referring now to
While the invention may be susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, specific embodiments have been shown by way of example in the drawings and have been described in detail herein. However, it should be understood that the invention is not intended to be limited to the particular forms disclosed. Rather, the invention is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the following appended claims.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/629,057 filed Nov. 17, 2004 by Peter J. Nunes, Joel Del Eckels, John G. Reynolds, Philip F. Pagoria, and Randall L. Simpson, titled “Colorimetric Chemical Analysis Sampler for the Presence of Explosives.” U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/629,057 filed Nov. 17, 2004 titled “Colorimetric Chemical Analysis Sampler for the Presence of Explosives” is incorporated herein by this reference. The following applications contain related subject matter and are owned by the common assignee, Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC for the operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory: U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/165,474, Filed Jun. 22, 2005, for Chemical Analysis Coupon for the Presence of Explosives; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/158,480, Filed Jun. 21, 2005 for Chemical Analysis Kit for the Presence of Explosives; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/159,451, Filed Jun. 22, 2005 for Spot Test Kit for Explosives Detection; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/525,655, Filed Sep. 21, 2006 for Explosives Tester with Heater; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/593,257, Filed Nov. 1, 2006 for Explosives Tester with Heater; and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/634,784, Filed Dec. 5, 2006 for Low to Moderate Temperature Nanolaminate Heater; which are incorporated herein by this reference.
The United States Government has rights in this invention pursuant to Contract No. W-7405-ENG-48 between the United States Department of Energy and the University of California for the operation of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3446596 | Salivar et al. | May 1969 | A |
4003706 | Szekely | Jan 1977 | A |
4635488 | Kremer | Jan 1987 | A |
4788039 | Glattstein | Nov 1988 | A |
5078968 | Nason | Jan 1992 | A |
5246669 | Hayashi | Sep 1993 | A |
5296380 | Margalit | Mar 1994 | A |
5354692 | Yang et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5364792 | Stone | Nov 1994 | A |
5550061 | Stone | Aug 1996 | A |
5633140 | Wex et al. | May 1997 | A |
5709838 | Porter et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
6153147 | Craig | Nov 2000 | A |
6214291 | Kerman | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6228280 | Li et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6863866 | Kelly et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
7285246 | Martin | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7410612 | Carrington | Aug 2008 | B1 |
7829020 | Pagoria et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
20030104506 | Durst et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040265169 | Haas et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050101027 | Haas | May 2005 | A1 |
20060172438 | Milunic et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20080069728 | Attar et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
058125 | Mar 1994 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070202009 A1 | Aug 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60629057 | Nov 2004 | US |