1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to automatic gain selection circuits, and more particularly to a column amplifier having automatic gain selection for CMOS image sensors.
2. Description of the Related Art
In order to design improved CMOS image sensors for low light sensitivity, excellent low noise performance is desired. Besides the noise generated directly in each pixel, the noise contribution of all subsequent analog processing stages must be considered as well. To minimize the impact of these system noise sources, it is beneficial to amplify each pixel sensor signal as early as possible in the image sensor. Early amplification leads to an improved signal-to-noise ratio, since the signal is amplified, but the noise of the system components after the amplification stage is not. The problem with signal amplification, however, is that large signals, when amplified, can end up being outside of the dynamic range of the sensor In other words, signal amplification reduces the over-all dynamic range of the system.
One prior attempt to solve this problem is disclosed by S. Kawahito et al., A Column-Based Pixel-Gain-Adaptive CMOS Image Sensor for Low-Light—Level Imaging, Proc. of IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference (ISSCC), 2003, San Francisco, Volume 46, Page 224. As shown in
Therefore, it would be desirable if a selective amplification could be applied to the pixel signals in an image sensor, wherein the amplification decision is less dependent on the non-uniformities of the pixels.
In general, the present invention is a column amplifier architecture having automatic gain selection for CMOS image sensors. In one embodiment, a comparator compares an amplified column buffer output signal to a reference voltage. The output of the comparator controls the gain of the amplifier based on the result of the comparison. Initially, a high column buffer gain is selected. For small signals, the output of the column buffer stays below the reference voltage and the output signal stays within the system's dynamic range. For larger signals, the column buffer output will exceed the reference voltage (and also the system's dynamic range) and therefore the comparator output switches states, which selects the low-gain setting.
The switching of the comparator output reduces the gain of the column buffer such that the amplified signal returns back to be within the allowed operating range. If desired, the process can be repeated through several gain steps (i.e. high, medium, low). Also, several comparators and reference voltages could be utilized at the same time in order to determine an optimum gain setting. As a result of the architecture of the present invention, the signal will always be amplified with the maximum gain possible, thereby reducing the effect of noise from other system components.
Additionally, the comparator outputs a range output signal, used to identify to downstream processing blocks, which gain setting was used for the corresponding pixel output signal. After additional processing by other analog stages, such as a line driver, a programmable gain amplifier and an analog-to-digital converter, a digital correction stage attenuate the amplified signals as directed by the range output signal from the comparator.
The present invention will be readily understood by the following detailed description in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein like reference numerals designate like structural elements, and in which:
The following description is provided to enable any person skilled in the art to make and use the invention and sets forth the best modes contemplated by the inventor for carrying out the invention. Various modifications, however, will remain readily apparent to those skilled in the art. Any and all such modifications, equivalents and alternatives are intended to fall within the spirit and scope of the present invention.
In general, a CMOS image sensor comprises a plurality of pixels arranged in rows and columns. For example, in a typical HDTV video application, a sensor may comprise 1920 columns and 1080 rows. Signals from the pixels are typically read-out of the sensor on a column by column basis. Each column may include a column buffer to amplify the small analog signals from each pixel. The present invention provides a multi-gain amplification with automatic gain selection directly in the column buffers. Since the column buffer is the first analog stage after the pixel, the benefit of amplification is maximized. The noise contribution of all the following circuits is thus reduced. While the present invention is described herein with respect to reading the pixel signals out on a column basis, the present invention could also be advantageously applied to systems that read out the pixel signals on a row basis, or even systems which multiplex several columns into a single column buffer amplifier circuit.
As illustrated in
Next a programmable gain amplifier (PGA) 36 further amplifies the signal as determined by the over-all light conditions and system parameters. An analog-to-digital converter (ADC) 38 then converts the analog signal to a digital signal. Note that the noise contributions of the line driver 34, PGA 36, and ADC 38 are reduced by 1/A for the signals amplified at the column buffer stage. Finally, a digital correction stage 40 reduces the amplified signals by a gain factor of 1/A. Thus, the present invention effectively reduces the noise contribution of the analog processing blocks for small signals, without adversely affecting the dynamic range of the system.
In this example, the total noise of the system comprises:
v2=v2pixel+v2colbuf+v2LD+v2PGA+v2ADC+v2crosstalk (Eqn. 1)
Applying a gain factor of A in the column buffer, lead to:
v2=[A2*(v2pixel+v2colbuf)+v2LD+v2ADC+v2crosstalk]/A2 (Eqn. 2)
=v2pixel+v2colbuf+(v2LD+v2PGA+v2ADCv2crosstalk)/A2 (Eqn. 3)
Vout=(Vpixel*A)/A=Vpixel (Eqn. 4)
Thus, the noise contributions of the line driver, PGA, ADC and crosstalk are reduced by 1/A, and the SNR (Vout/√v2) is improved.
A high-level schematic of an automatic gain selection circuit 50 utilized in each column buffer is shown
The switching of the comparator 54 output reduces the gain of the column buffer 52 such that the amplified signal returns back to be within the allowed operating range. If desired, the process can be repeated through several gain steps (i.e. high, medium, low). Also, several comparators and reference voltages could be utilized at the same time in order to determine an optimum gain setting. As a result of the architecture of the present invention, the signal will always be amplified with the maximum gain possible, thereby reducing the effect of noise from other system components.
Note that in contrast to the Kawahito et al. solution discussed above with reference to
1. Since the signal has already been “double-sampled” the non-uniformities of the pixels have been virtually eliminated. Therefore, the comparator decision is based on the actual integrated signal charge on each pixel, but not on the pixel-to-pixel variations.
2. Since the comparison is performed after a high-gain amplification, the sensitivity versus inaccuracies of the reference voltage or the comparator offsets is greatly reduced. Although the comparator offset is negligible to the first order, a low offset helps to reduce second order effects later in the data reconstruction process, and also avoids column non-uniformities at the transition point from one gain domain to the next.
A more detailed schematic of one possible switched capacitor implementation of the automatic gain selection circuitry is shown in
The amplifier 62 and the comparator 64 may be implemented as operational amplifiers, using a folded cascode architecture. In order for the digital correction stage 40 (
The circuit of
Those skilled in the art will appreciate that various adaptations and modifications of the just-described preferred embodiments can be configured without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention. Therefore, it is to be understood that, within the scope of the appended claims, the invention may be practiced other than as specifically described herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6486808 | Seppi et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6498927 | Kang et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6707492 | Itani | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6757018 | Fowler | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6829007 | Bilhan et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6940553 | Katoh | Sep 2005 | B1 |
7042285 | Parkhurst et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7079178 | Hynecek | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7123301 | Nakamura et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7349017 | Tan et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
20020134918 | Miida | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030080340 | Henderson et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20040041927 | Cho et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040080637 | Nakamura et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040104771 | Dauphinee et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20050259167 | Inoue et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20070103569 | Kawahito | May 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080136952 A1 | Jun 2008 | US |