1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to a comb and particularly to a comb for removing lice, nits and/or lice eggs from human hair or for removing lice, nits and/or lice eggs or fleas from animal hair or fur.
2. Description of Related Art
Fine toothed hair combs are well known. However, known fine toothed combs, which may be used for smoothing and straightening hair to a desired extent, suffer from a disadvantage that they cannot readily be passed through the hair, particularly if the hair is tangled. It is therefore also well known to provide a comb with a single row of teeth in two portions, a second portion having teeth which are more finely spaced than the first portion. Hair may then be first coarsely combed with the portion having more coarsely spaced teeth and then more finely combed with the portion having more finely spaced teeth.
Such an arrangement is not practical for a finely spaced teeth comb for the removal of lice, nits—i.e. empty egg shells, lice eggs, fleas and similar parasites because such a comb has preferably to be passed through the hair in contact with the human scalp or body of an animal along the whole length of the comb. Because of the curvature of the scalp or body, this restricts the length of a straight comb. Although, in principle, a nit comb of twice the normal length could be used first with one portion with more widely spaced teeth, and then with the another portion with more closely spaced teeth, this is inconvenient, and there is no guarantee that the comb would be properly used by an inexperienced user. For example, such a user may seek to use the full length of the comb in each pass through the hair, and thereby not keep the whole length of the comb in contact with the scalp or body, and smaller parasites would also pass between the more widely spaced teeth.
A hair comb having two rows of teeth is known from GB-539653-A in which a first row of teeth in coarsely spaced and a second row of teeth is finely spaced so that the first row of teeth coarsely combs the hair before the relatively finely spaced teeth comb the hair. The two rows of teeth of the disclosure are preferably formed with a convex curvature to provide a smoothing action on the hair. Teeth of one of the rows are shorter than the teeth of the other row. This facilitates the use of the comb at an acute angle to the scalp. The teeth are tapering and a preferred spacing of a first row of teeth is an integer multiple of the spacing of the second row of teeth, so that teeth on the finely spaced row may be aligned with spaces between teeth of the more coarsely spaced row of teeth. It is asserted that with this comb the hair can be coarsely combed with the coarsely spaced teeth and finely combed with the finely combed teeth in one motion through the hair.
Such a comb as disclosed in GB-539653-A has a number of disadvantages for the removal of head lice, nits and eggs and fleas. The presence of rows of teeth of different lengths means that the comb cannot effectively be used substantially perpendicular to the scalp, which is the preferred orientation for the removal of head lice, nits, eggs and fleas. Moreover, the tapering shape of the teeth means that there is a tapering space between the teeth, so that a uniform barrier is not presented to the head lice, nits and eggs and fleas. Thus, objects of a given size may be trapped in a narrow portion of the tapering space but pass through a wider portion of the tapering space between teeth. The restriction of the spacing of one row of teeth being an integer multiple of the spacing of the second row of teeth also means that the spacings may not be optimised for the entrapment of large lice and fleas and also smaller lice, nits and eggs and fleas.
There is also known from GB 2342291 a hair comb with a handle and two rows of teeth, the teeth of the first row of teeth being of substantially the same length as the teeth of the second row of teeth, wherein the spacing of the teeth is arranged for the removal of head lice and/or nits and/or head lice eggs from combed hair. The handle has an advantage of permitting the comb to be more firmly grasped than a handle-less comb. Although this comb is useful in removing head lice, nits and head lice eggs it has a disadvantage that it is preferably only passed through the hair in one direction, with the more widely spaced row of teeth leading. Unlike some known nit combs without an extending handle, the comb cannot be readily reversed and still grasped by the handle. This is not particularly disadvantage when, for example, a parent is combing a child's hair, but for a user combing their own hair both a left-handed comb and a right-handed comb are ideally required. Similarly, when combing a pet's or other animal's hair it would be preferable to be able to use a same comb in either direction.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a comb suitable for the removal of head lice, nits and head lice eggs or fleas which at least partially overcomes at least some of the above problems in the prior art.
According to this invention, there is provided a comb including a spine and, extending from the spine in adjacent, substantially parallel planes, a first outer row of teeth, a central row of teeth and a second outer row of teeth opposed to the first outer row of teeth, the teeth of the first and second outer rows of teeth and of the central row of teeth being of substantially a same length, wherein the spacing of the teeth of the central row is different from the spacing of the teeth of the first and second outer rows and the spacing of the teeth is arranged for the removal of head lice and/or nits and/or head lice eggs and/or fleas from combed hair or fur, such that the comb may be used in a left or right hand.
Conveniently, the teeth of the central row of teeth are more closely spaced than the teeth of at least the first outer row of teeth.
Preferably, the teeth in at least one of the rows of teeth have a substantially circular cross section.
Advantageously, the teeth in at least one of the rows of teeth have rounded tips remote from the spine.
Preferably, the teeth in at least one of the rows of teeth are of metal.
Preferably, the rows of teeth extend in a direction substantially orthogonal to a major axis of the spine.
Conveniently, the central row of teeth has at least 20% more teeth per unit length than at least the first outer row of teeth.
Advantageously, the teeth of at least the first outer row are spaced at 8 to 10 teeth per centimeter and the teeth of the central row are spaced at 10 to 12 teeth per centimeter.
Conveniently, the teeth of at least the first outer row are spaced at 10 teeth per centimeter and the teeth of the central row are spaced at 12 teeth per centimeter.
Advantageously, the spacing between the teeth of the first outer row is approximately 0.36 mm and the spacing between the teeth of the central row is 0.15 mm to 0.20 mm.
Preferably, the diameter of each tooth is approximately 0.65 mm to 0.75 mm.
Advantageously, terminal teeth at ends of at least one of the rows have a larger diameter than other teeth in the at least one of the rows.
Conveniently, the terminal teeth have a diameter of 1.0 mm to 1.1 mm.
Alternatively, teeth of the central or inner row are more widely spaced than teeth in at least the first outer row.
Preferably, handle means is attached to the spine.
Advantageously, the handle means is integrally formed with the spine and provided with grip means for assisting a user to grip the handle means.
The invention will now be described by way of example with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
In the figures like reference numerals denote like parts.
Referring to
Referring to
For lice, nits and lice egg removal the spacing between the teeth of the outer rows in a currently preferred embodiment is 0.36 mm and the spacing between the teeth of the inner row is preferably 0.15 mm to 0.20 mm.
For flea removal the spacing between the teeth of the outer rows in a currently preferred embodiment is 0.36 mm and the spacing between the teeth of the inner row is preferably 0.18 mm to 0.20 mm.
Also, in a currently preferred embodiment, the diameter of each tooth of both the inner and outer rows of teeth is approximately 0.65 mm-0.75 mm but in another embodiment, the outer rows of teeth, i.e. the more widely spaced rows, have a larger diameter than the inner row of teeth.
As best seen in
In use, the hair comb may be moved in either direction of double-headed arrow-headed line A shown in
In another embodiment of a comb 200 according to the invention, underside views of the teeth portion of which are shown in
Although embodiments have been described in which the two outer rows have a same spacing of teeth and a same cross-sectional diameter, it will be understood that the outer rows may have different spacings and/or cross-sectional diameters from each other. Where a first outer row is more widely spaced than a second, opposed outer row, the comb may be used first with the widely spaced outer-row leading and subsequently with the less widely spaced outer row leading, for example, as the hair or fur becomes less tangled.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0614049.5 | Jul 2006 | GB | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/GB2007/002508 | 7/5/2007 | WO | 00 | 6/8/2009 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2008/007055 | 1/17/2008 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
997 | Sanford | Nov 1838 | A |
397926 | McPherson | Feb 1889 | A |
930678 | Moore | Aug 1909 | A |
1347260 | Desmarais | Jul 1920 | A |
1436776 | Nach | Nov 1922 | A |
1471527 | Proctor | Oct 1923 | A |
1582151 | Wolkow | Apr 1926 | A |
1624753 | De Dios Moreno | Apr 1927 | A |
2205200 | Huppert | Jun 1940 | A |
2238603 | Runnels | Apr 1941 | A |
D132367 | Imamura | May 1942 | S |
2626618 | Collison | Jan 1953 | A |
2633591 | Servilla | Apr 1953 | A |
2678047 | Garfield | May 1954 | A |
3133546 | Dent | May 1964 | A |
3216428 | Hallnan | Nov 1965 | A |
4008726 | DiGiuseppe | Feb 1977 | A |
4287898 | Konesky | Sep 1981 | A |
4475563 | Martin | Oct 1984 | A |
4612944 | Bachrach et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4807652 | Bachrach | Feb 1989 | A |
4928716 | Greene | May 1990 | A |
4993438 | Hunt | Feb 1991 | A |
5301695 | Wong | Apr 1994 | A |
5636646 | Zito | Jun 1997 | A |
5884633 | Ford | Mar 1999 | A |
5937868 | Ogunro | Aug 1999 | A |
6006758 | Thorne | Dec 1999 | A |
6098633 | Pabari | Aug 2000 | A |
D459027 | Chen et al. | Jun 2002 | S |
7234472 | Ramet | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7389779 | Chan | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7650893 | De Laforcade | Jan 2010 | B2 |
20040250831 | Rizzuto | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20060076030 | De Laforcade | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20080110471 | Oliver et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20100089412 | Brownfield | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100300469 | Bachrach et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110048439 | Young | Mar 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2677234 | Dec 1992 | FR |
2681228 | Mar 1993 | FR |
2294200 | Apr 1996 | GB |
2342291 | Apr 2000 | GB |
2342291 | Dec 2000 | GB |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100000559 A1 | Jan 2010 | US |