1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to well completion devices and methods for completing wells, such as natural gas and oil wells. More particularly, this invention relates to a well completion plug that facilitates use of a combustion device.
2. Related Art
Just prior to beginning production, oil and natural gas wells are completed using a complex process called “fracturing.” This process involves securing the steel casing pipe in place in the well bore with cement. The steel and cement barrier is then perforated with shaped explosive charges. The surrounding oil or gas reservoir is stimulated or “fractured” in order to start the flow of gas and oil into the well casing and up to the well head. This fracturing process can be repeated several times in a given well depending on various geological factors of the well, such as the depth of the well, size and active levels in the reservoir, reservoir pressure, and the like. Because of these factors, some wells may be fractured at only a few elevations along the well bore and others may be fractured at as many as 30 or more elevations.
As the well is prepared for fracturing at each desired level or zone of the well, a temporary plug is set in the bore of the steel well casing pipe just below the level where the fracturing will perforate the steel and cement barrier. When the barrier is perforated, “frac fluids” and sand are pumped down to the perforations, and into the reservoir. At least a portion of the fluids and sand are then drawn back out of the reservoir in order to stimulate movement of the gas or oil at the perforation level. Use of the temporary plug prevents contaminating the already fractured levels below.
This process is repeated several times, as the “frac” operation moves up the well bore until all the desired levels have been stimulated. At each level, the temporary plugs are usually left in place, so that they can all be drilled out at the end of the process, in a single, but often time-consuming drilling operation. One reason the drilling operation has been time intensive is that the temporary plugs have been made of cast iron which has generally required many hours and, occasionally, several passes of the drilling apparatus to completely drill out the plug. To reduce the drill out time, another type of down hole plug has been developed that is made of a composite material. Composite plugs are usually made of, or partially made of, a fiber and resin mixture, such as fiberglass and high performance plastics. Due to the nature of the composite material, composite plugs can be easily and quickly drilled out of a well bore in a single pass drilling operation. Alternatively, it has been proposed to combust or burn the plug or a portion thereof in order to eliminate its obstruction in the well casing.
Temporary well plugs used in the fracturing operation described above, whether made of cast iron or composite materials, often come in two varieties, bridge plugs and frac plugs. Bridge plugs restrict fluid movement in the upward and downward direction. Bridge plugs are used to temporarily or permanently seal off a level of the well bore. Frac plugs generally behave as one-way valves that restrict fluid movement down the well bore, but allow fluid movement up the well bore.
In use, when frac fluids and sand are pumped down to a newly perforated level of the well bore, a frac plug set in the well bore just below the perforation level can restrict the frac fluids and sand from traveling farther down the well bore and contaminating lower fractured levels. However, when the frac fluid and sand mixture is pumped back up the well to stimulate the reservoir at the newly fractured level, the one-way valve of the frac plug can open and allow gas and oil from lower levels to be pumped to the well head. This is advantageous to the well owner because it provides immediate revenue even while the well is still being completed. This upward flow can also assist in drilling out the plugs.
It has been recognized that it would be advantageous to develop a downhole tool, such as a bridge or frac plug, that facilitates the use of a combustion device. In addition, it has been recognized that it would be advantageous to develop a downhole tool that is field configurable as a bridge or frac plug.
The invention provides a downhole tool device with a combination anvil and coupler. A central mandrel is sized and shaped to fit within a well bore and including a hollow therein. At least one member is disposed on the central mandrel and movable with respect to the central mandrel along a longitudinal axis of the central mandrel. The at least one member includes a packer ring compressible along the longitudinal axis of the central mandrel to form a seal between the central mandrel and the well bore. The combination anvil and coupler is attached to a bottom of the mandrel and has an upper attachment section attached to the mandrel, an upper surface against which the at least one member is compressible, a lower attachment section configured to be attached to a burn device, and a hollow therethrough.
In accordance with a more detailed aspect of the present invention, the combination anvil and coupler further includes an intermediate section between the upper and lower attachment sections including at least one vent hole extending from the hollow to an exterior of the combination anvil and coupler.
Additional features and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the detailed description which follows, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, which together illustrate, by way of example, features of the invention; and, wherein:
a is a side view of a downhole tool or bridge plug with a coupler in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, and shown with a burn device installed thereon;
b is a cross-sectional view of the downhole tool or bridge plug with a coupler of
c is a partial cross-sectional view of
a is a side view of a downhole tool or fracture plug with a coupler in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, and shown without a burn device;
b is a cross-sectional side view of the downhole tool or fracture plug with a coupler of
Reference will now be made to the exemplary embodiments illustrated, and specific language will be used herein to describe the same. It will nevertheless be understood that no limitation of the scope of the invention is thereby intended.
As illustrated in
A burn device 12 can be attached to the down hole flow control device 10 to selectively cause the device or various components to burn and fall down the well bore to the “rat hole.” The burn device can be attached to the mandrel 20 with a combination anvil and coupler 4, as described in greater detail below. The burn device can include fuel, oxygen, an igniter and a control or activation system that allow the burn device to combust the flow control device 10. The burn device 12 can be attached to a bottom of the mandrel 20, and can be inserted into the hollow 24.
The central mandrel 20 can be sized and shaped to fit within a well bore, tube or casing for an oil or gas well. The central mandrel 20 can have a cylindrical body 22 with a hollow 24 or hollow center that can be open on a proximal or upper end 26. The upper end 26 of the mandrel can include a threaded bore 27 to receive a plug insert 208 or valve assembly insert 204 (
The central mandrel 20 can be formed of a material that is easily drilled or machined, such as cast iron, fiber and resin composite, and the like. In the case where the central mandrel 20 is made of a composite material, the fiber can be rotationally wound in plies having predetermined ply angles with respect to one another and the resin can have polymeric properties suitable for extreme environments, as known in the art. In one aspect, the composite article can include an epoxy resin with a curing agent. Additionally, other types of resin devices, such as bismaleimide, phenolic, thermoplastic, and the like can be used. The fibers can be E-type and ECR type glass fibers as well as carbon fibers. It will be appreciated that other types of mineral fibers, such as silica, basalt, and the like, can be used for high temperature applications. Alternatively, the mandrel 20 can be formed of material that is combustible, such as magnesium, aluminum or the like.
Referring to
Referring again to
A compressible packer ring 40 can be disposed on the cylindrical body 22 of the central mandrel 20. The packer ring 40 can have an outer diameter just slightly smaller than the diameter of the well bore. The packer ring 40 can be compressible along the longitudinal axis 32 of the central mandrel 20 and radially expandable in order to form a seal between the central mandrel 20 and the well bore. The packer ring 40 can be formed of an elastomeric polymer that can conform to the shape of the well bore or casing and the central mandrel 20.
In one aspect, the packer ring 40 can be formed of three rings, including a central ring 42 and two outer rings 44 and 46 on either side of the central ring. In this case, each of the three rings 42, 44, and 46 can be formed of an elastomeric material having different physical properties from one another, such as durometer, glass transition temperatures, melting points, and elastic modulii, from the other rings. In this way, each of the rings forming the packer ring 40 can withstand different environmental conditions, such as temperature or pressure, so as to maintain the seal between the well bore or casing over a wide variety of environmental conditions.
An upper slip ring 60 and a lower slip ring 80 can also be disposed on the central mandrel 20 with the upper slip ring 60 disposed above the packer ring 40 and the lower slip ring 80 disposed below the packer ring 40. Each of the upper and lower slip rings 60 and 80 can include a plurality of slip segments 62 and 82, respectively, that can be joined together by fracture regions 64 and 84 respectively, to form the rings 62 and 82. The fracture regions 64 and 84 can facilitate longitudinal fractures to break the slip rings 60 and 80 into the plurality of slip segments 62 and 82. Each of the plurality of slip segments can be configured to be displaceable radially to secure the down hole flow control device 10 in the well bore.
The upper and lower slip rings 60 and 80 can have a plurality of raised ridges 66 and 86, respectively, that extend circumferentially around the outer diameter of each of the rings. The ridges 66 and 86 can be sized and shaped to bite into the well bore wall or casing. Thus, when an outward radial force is exerted on the slip rings 60 and 80, the fracture regions 64 and 84 can break the slip rings into the separable slip segments 62 and 82 that can bite into the well bore or casing wall and wedge between the down hole flow control device and the well bore. In this way, the upper and lower slip segments 62 and 82 can secure or anchor the down hole flow control device 10 in a desired location in the well bore.
The upper and lower slip rings 60 and 80 can be formed of a material that is easily drilled or machined so as to facilitate easy removal of the down hole flow control device from a well bore. For example, the upper and lower slip rings 60 and 80 can be formed of a cast iron or composite material. Additionally, the fracture regions 64 and 84 can be formed by stress concentrators, stress risers, material flaws, notches, slots, variations in material properties, and the like, that can produce a weaker region in the slip ring.
In one aspect, the upper and lower slip rings 60 and 80 can be formed of a composite material including fiber windings, fiber mats, chopped fibers, or the like, and a resin material. In this case, the fracture regions can be formed by a disruption in the fiber matrix, or introduction of gaps in the fiber matrix at predetermined locations around the ring. In this way, the material difference in the composite article can form the fracture region that results in longitudinal fractures of the ring at the locations of the fracture regions.
In another aspect, the upper and lower slip rings 60 and 80 can be formed of a cast material such as cast iron. The cast iron can be machined at desired locations around the ring to produce materially thinner regions such as notches or longitudinal slots 70 and 90 in the ring that will fracture under an applied load. In this way, the thinner regions in the cast iron ring can form the fracture region that results in longitudinal fractures of the ring at the locations of the fracture regions. In another aspect, the upper and lower slip rings 60 and 80 can be formed of a material that is combustible.
In yet another aspect, the upper and lower slip rings 60 and 80 can also have different fracture regions 64 and 84 from one another. For example, the fracture regions 64 and 84 can include longitudinal slots spaced circumferentially around the ring, the longitudinal slots 90 of the lower slip ring 80 can be larger than the slots 70 of the upper slip ring 60. Thus, the fracture regions 84 of the lower slip ring 80 can include less material than the fracture regions 64 of the upper slip ring 60. In this way, the lower slip ring 80 can be designed to fracture before the upper slip ring 60 so as to induce sequential fracturing with respect to the upper and lower slip rings 60 and 80 when an axial load is applied to both the upper slip ring and the lower slip ring.
It will be appreciated that compression of the packer ring 40 can occur when the distance between the upper and lower slip rings 60 and 80 is decreased such that the upper and lower slip rings 60 and 80 squeeze or compress the packer ring 40 between them. Thus, if the slip rings fracture under the same load, or at the same approximate time during the compression operation, the distance between the two rings 60 and 80 may not be small enough to have sufficiently compressed the packer ring 40 so as to form an adequate seal between the central mandrel 20 and the well bore or casing wall. In contrast, the sequential fracturing mechanism of the down hole flow control device 10 described above advantageously allows the lower slip ring 80 to set first, while the upper slip ring 60 can continue to move longitudinally along the central mandrel 20 until the upper slip ring 60 compresses the packer ring 40 against the lower slip ring 80. In this way, the lower slip ring 80 sets and anchors the tool to the well bore or casing wall and the upper ring 60 can be pushed downward toward the lower ring 80, thereby squeezing or compressing the packer ring 40 that is sandwiched between the upper and lower slip rings 60 and 80.
The down hole flow control device 10 can also include an upper cone 100 and a lower cone 110 that can be disposed on the central mandrel 20 adjacent the upper and lower slip rings 60 and 80. Each of the upper and lower cones 100 and 110 can be sized and shaped to fit under the upper and lower slip rings 60 and 80 so as to induce stress into the upper or lower slip ring 60 and 80, respectively. The upper and lower cones 100 and 110 can induce stress into the upper or lower slip rings 60 and 80 by redirecting the axial load pushing the upper and lower slip rings together against the anvil combination anvil and coupler 4 to a radial load that can push radially outward from under the upper and lower slip rings. This outward radial loading can cause the upper and lower slip rings 60 and 80 to fracture into slip segments 62 and 82 when the axial load is applied and moves the upper slip ring 60 toward the lower slip ring 80.
The upper and lower cones 100 and 110 can be formed from a material that is easily drilled or machined such as cast iron or a composite material. In one aspect the upper and lower cones 100 and 110 can be fabricated from a fiber and resin composite material with fiber windings, fiber mats, or chopped fibers infused with a resin material. Advantageously, the composite material can be easily drilled or machined so as to facilitate removal of the down hole flow control device 10 from a well bore after the slip segments have engaged the well bore wall or casing. Alternatively, the upper and lower cones 100 and 110 can be formed of a combustible material, such as magnesium or aluminum or the like.
The upper and lower cones 100 and 110 can also include a plurality of stress inducers 102 and 112 disposed about the upper and lower cones. The stress inducers 102 and 112 can be pins that can be set into holes in the conical faces of the upper and lower cones 60 and 80, and dispersed around the circumference of the conical faces. The location of the pins around the circumference of the cones can correspond to the location of the fracture regions 64 and 84 (or the slots) of the upper and lower slip rings 60 and 80. In this way, each stress inducer 102 and 112 can be positioned adjacent a corresponding respective fracture region 64 or 84, respectively, in the upper and lower slip rings. Advantageously, the stress inducers 102 and 112 can be sized and shaped to transfer an applied load from the upper or lower cone 100 and 110 to the fracture regions 64 and 84 of the upper or lower slip rings 60 or 80, respectively, in order to cause fracturing of the slip ring at the fracture region and to reduce uneven or unwanted fracturing of the slip rings at locations other than the fracture regions. Additionally, the stress inducers 102 and 112 can help to move the individual slip segments into substantially uniformly spaced circumferential positions around the upper and lower cones 100 and 110, respectively. In this way the stress inducers 102 and 112 can promote fracturing of the upper and lower slip rings 60 and 80 into substantially similarly sized and shaped slip segments 62 and 82.
The down hole flow control device 10 can also have an upper backing ring 130 and a lower backing ring 150 disposed on the central mandrel 20 between the packer ring 40 and the upper and lower slip rings 60 and 80, respectively. In one aspect, the upper and lower backing rings 130 and 150 can be disposed on the central mandrel 20 between the packer ring 40 and the upper and lower cones 100 and 110, respectively. The upper and lower backing rings 130 and lower 150 can be sized so as to bind and retain opposite ends 44 and 46 of the packer ring 40.
It will be appreciated that the down hole flow control device 10 described herein can be used with a variety of down hole tools. Thus, as indicated above,
Referring to
While the forgoing examples are illustrative of the principles of the present invention in one or more particular applications, it will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that numerous modifications in form, usage and details of implementation can be made without the exercise of inventive faculty, and without departing from the principles and concepts of the invention. Accordingly, it is not intended that the invention be limited, except as by the claims set forth below.
This is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/800,448, filed May 3, 2007; which is hereby incorporated by reference. This is related to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/089,302, filed Aug. 15, 2008; which is hereby incorporated by reference. This is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/253,319, filed Oct. 15, 2008, entitled “Downhole Tool with Exposable and Openable Flow-Back Vents”; which is hereby incorporated by reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1684266 | Fisher et al. | Sep 1928 | A |
| 2043225 | Armentrout et al. | Jun 1936 | A |
| 2160804 | Hall et al. | May 1939 | A |
| 2205119 | Hall et al. | Jun 1940 | A |
| 2230712 | Bendeler et al. | Feb 1941 | A |
| 2249172 | Quintrell | Jul 1941 | A |
| 2338326 | Green | Jan 1944 | A |
| 2577068 | Baker | Dec 1951 | A |
| 2589506 | Morrisett | Mar 1952 | A |
| 2672199 | McKenna | Mar 1954 | A |
| 2725941 | Henshaw | Dec 1955 | A |
| 2785758 | Baker | Mar 1957 | A |
| 3021902 | Keithahn | Feb 1962 | A |
| 3136365 | Carter et al. | Jun 1964 | A |
| 3148731 | Holden | Sep 1964 | A |
| 3163225 | Perkins | Dec 1964 | A |
| 3211232 | Grimmer | Oct 1965 | A |
| 3298440 | Current | Jan 1967 | A |
| 3306366 | Muse | Feb 1967 | A |
| 3314480 | Scott | Apr 1967 | A |
| 3420304 | Kilgore | Jan 1969 | A |
| 3497003 | Berryman et al. | Feb 1970 | A |
| 3506067 | Lebourg | Apr 1970 | A |
| 3517742 | Williams | Jun 1970 | A |
| 3570595 | Berryman | Mar 1971 | A |
| 3831677 | Mullins | Aug 1974 | A |
| 3976133 | Allen | Aug 1976 | A |
| 4099563 | Hutchison et al. | Jul 1978 | A |
| 4151875 | Sullaway | May 1979 | A |
| 4285398 | Zandmer et al. | Aug 1981 | A |
| 4289200 | Fisher, Jr. | Sep 1981 | A |
| 4312406 | McLaurin et al. | Jan 1982 | A |
| 4359090 | Luke | Nov 1982 | A |
| 4397351 | Harris | Aug 1983 | A |
| 4432418 | Mayland | Feb 1984 | A |
| 4488595 | Akkerman | Dec 1984 | A |
| 4524825 | Fore | Jun 1985 | A |
| 4532989 | Barker | Aug 1985 | A |
| 4542788 | Semar | Sep 1985 | A |
| 4553596 | Graham et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
| 4664188 | Zunkel et al. | May 1987 | A |
| 4665977 | Mullins | May 1987 | A |
| 4708202 | Sukup et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
| 4730835 | Wilcox et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
| 4739829 | Brunner | Apr 1988 | A |
| 4745972 | Bell et al. | May 1988 | A |
| 4784226 | Wyatt | Nov 1988 | A |
| 4813481 | Sproul et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
| 4834184 | Streich et al. | May 1989 | A |
| 4858687 | Watson et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
| 4926938 | Lindsey, Jr. | May 1990 | A |
| 4984636 | Bailey et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
| 5086839 | Setterberg, Jr. et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
| 5095978 | Akkerman et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5131468 | Lane et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5188182 | Echols, III et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5224540 | Streich et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
| 5253709 | Kendrick et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5271468 | Streich et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5333684 | Walter et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5340626 | Head | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5390737 | Jacobi et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5392856 | Broussard, Jr. et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5404956 | Bohlen et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5413172 | Laurel | May 1995 | A |
| 5422183 | Sinclair et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5441111 | Whiteford | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5479986 | Gano et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5540279 | Branch et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5542473 | Pringle et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5553667 | Budde et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5597784 | Sinclair et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5607017 | Owens et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5613560 | Jelinski et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5678635 | Dunlap et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5701959 | Hushbeck et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5749419 | Coronado et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5765641 | Shy et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5787979 | Giroux et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5813457 | Giroux et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5819846 | Bolt, Jr. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5837656 | Sinclair et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5839515 | Yuan et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5904207 | Rubbo et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5924696 | Frazier | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5941309 | Appleton | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5984007 | Yuan et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5990051 | Ischy et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6009944 | Gudmestad | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6026903 | Shy et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6056053 | Giroux et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6076600 | Vick, Jr. et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6082451 | Giroux et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6131663 | Henley et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6145593 | Hennig | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6167957 | Frazier | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6167963 | McMahan et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6189618 | Beeman et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6220349 | Vargus et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6220350 | Brothers et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6244642 | Serafin et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6279656 | Sinclair et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6318461 | Carisella | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6318729 | Pitto, Jr. et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6354372 | Carisella et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6394180 | Berscheidt et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6412388 | Frazier | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6431274 | Nowlin et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6481496 | Jackson et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6491108 | Slup et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6491116 | Berscheidt et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
| 6540033 | Sullivan et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6578633 | Slup et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6581681 | Zimmerman et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6598672 | Bell et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6598679 | Robertson | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6599863 | Palmer et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6651738 | Solfronk et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6651743 | Szarka | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6655459 | Mackay | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6666275 | Neal et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6695050 | Winslow et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6695051 | Smith et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6708768 | Slup et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6708770 | Slup et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6712153 | Turley et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6732822 | Slack et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6752209 | Mondelli et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6769491 | Zimmerman et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6793022 | Vick et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6796376 | Frazier | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6799638 | Butterfield, Jr. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6827150 | Luke | Dec 2004 | B2 |
| 6976534 | Sutton et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 6986390 | Doane et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 7017672 | Owen, Sr. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7036602 | Turley et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7044230 | Starr et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7049272 | Sinclair et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7093664 | Todd et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7124831 | Turley et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7163066 | Lehr | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7168494 | Starr et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7210533 | Starr et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7255178 | Slup et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7258165 | Williams | Aug 2007 | B1 |
| 7273099 | East, Jr. et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7287596 | Frazier et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7322413 | Rogers et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7337852 | Manke et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7350582 | McKeachnie et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7353879 | Todd et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7373973 | Smith et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7380600 | Willberg et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7395856 | Murray | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7452161 | Freyer et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7455118 | Roberts et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7461699 | Richard et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7464764 | Xu | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7475736 | Lehr et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
| 7510018 | Williamson et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7735549 | Nish et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
| 7743836 | Cook et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7789135 | Turley et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7900696 | Nish et al. | Mar 2011 | B1 |
| 7980300 | Roberts et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 8403036 | Neer et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 20020070503 | Zimmerman et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020162662 | Passamaneck et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20030155112 | Tiernan et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030188862 | Streich et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030226660 | Winslow et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20040003928 | Frazier | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040036225 | Ritter et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040045723 | Slup et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040177952 | Turley et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20050077053 | Walker et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050161224 | Starr et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050189103 | Roberts et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050205264 | Starr et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20060124307 | Turley et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060131031 | McKeachnie et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060278405 | Turley et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070039160 | Turley et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070074873 | McKeachnie et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070102165 | Slup et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070119600 | Slup et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070284097 | Swor et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070284114 | Swor et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080047717 | Frazier et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080060821 | Smith et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080073074 | Frazier | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080073081 | Frazier et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080073086 | Cook et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080202764 | Clayton et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080257549 | Swor et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20090000792 | Turley et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090038790 | Barlow | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090044957 | Clayton et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090065194 | Frazier | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090065216 | Frazier | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090078647 | Frazier et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090139720 | Frazier | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090159274 | Frazier | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090178808 | Williamson et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20100024703 | Zampioello et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100155050 | Frazier | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100276159 | Mailand et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100282004 | Nance et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100288487 | Turley et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20110079383 | Porter et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| Entry |
|---|
| Baker Hughes Baker Oil Tools Remedial Systems Technical Unit QUIK Drill Composite Bridge Plug and Wireline Adapter Kit PRoduct Family Nos. H40129 and H43848, Feb. 28, 2002, pp. 1-12. |
| Weatherford FracGuard Composite Plugs, 2004, 7 pages. |
| BJ Python Composite Bridge Plug, Product Information Sep. 20, 2001, 1 page. |
| Halliburton FAS Drill Squeeze Packers, Drillable Tools, 1999, 6 page. |
| Weatherford Completion Systems FracGuard Series Composite Frac Plug 2001, Brochure No. 432.00 & 433.00; 2 pages. |
| BioBalls MR, Soluble Ball Sealers, www.santrol.com, Applicant believes that the Bioballs were offered for sale prior to the filed of applicant's application. |
| Nish, et al., U.S. Appl. No. 12/253,319, filed Oct. 17, 2008. |
| Nish, et al., U.S. Appl. No. 12/353,655, filed Jan. 14, 2009. |
| Jason Jon Vogel, et al., U.S. Appl. No. 12/549,652, filed Aug. 28, 2009. |
| Composite Plugs, Magnum Oil Tools International; 19 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/362,185, filed Jan. 31, 2012; Randall W. Nish; office action issued May 2, 2012. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/549,652, filed Aug. 28, 2009; Jason Jon Vogel; office action issued Apr. 18, 2012. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/549,652, filed Aug. 28, 2009; Jason Jon Vogel; notice of allowance issued May 23, 2012. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/353,655, filed Jan. 14, 2009; Randall W. Nish; Notice of Allowance issued Nov. 2, 2011. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/549,652, filed Aug. 28, 2009; Jason Vogle; Office Action issued Nov. 9, 2011. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/362,185, filed Jan. 31, 2012; Randal W. Nish; office action dated Aug. 29, 2012. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/176,107, filed Jul. 5, 2011; Nish; office action dated Sep. 11, 2013. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/916,095, filed Oct. 29, 2010; Randall William Nish; office action dated Mar. 20, 2013. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61089302 | Aug 2008 | US |