Combined adder and pre-adder for high-radix multiplier circuit

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9684488
  • Patent Number
    9,684,488
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, March 26, 2015
    9 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, June 20, 2017
    7 years ago
Abstract
Circuitry accepting a first input value and a second input value, and outputting (a) a first sum involving the first input value and the second input value, and (b) a second sum involving the first input value and the second input value, includes a first adder circuit, a second adder circuit, a compressor circuit and a preprocessing stage. The first input value and the second input value are input to the first adder circuit to provide the first sum. The first input value and the second input value are input to the preprocessing stage to provide inputs to the compressor circuit, which provides first and second compressed output signals which in turn are input to the second adder circuit to provide the second sum. The preprocessing stage may include circuitry to programmably zero the first input value, so that the first sum is programmably settable to the second input value.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to circuitry that can be used to combine the initial adder of a high-radix multiplier with an optional pre-adder.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Certain types of circuits that perform mathematical operations may require multiple adder circuits, such as carry-propagate or ripple-carry adders, which are inefficient. For example, in a symmetrical finite impulse response (FIR) filter, inputs may be added prior to being multiplied, which reduces the number of multipliers. However, that addition requires a pre-adder, and then the multiplication itself may include a compressor followed by another adder. The provision of multiple adders consumes a substantial amount of integrated circuit device area, and is of particular concern in programmable logic devices such as field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs).


Moreover, large multiplication problems, such as those encountered in FIR filters, may require large compressor trees. The size of the compressor tree can be reduced by increasing the radix of the multiplier, but that in turn may require non-power-of-two manipulations of the inputs, which cannot be performed by simple shifting (as can be done for power-of-two manipulations), and may introduce the need for still more adders.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In accordance with embodiments of the present invention, the initial adder, or pre-adder, of an adder-multiplier-adder structure, which might itself include multiple adders (e.g., an adder-multiplexer-adder structure), can be simplified by providing a compressor followed by adders (e.g., a compressor-adder-adder structure). And because the adders will be adjacent one another, they can be combined into a single adder.


Therefore, in accordance with embodiments of the present invention there is provided circuitry accepting a first input value and a second input value and outputting (a) a first sum involving the first input value and the second input value, and (b) a second sum involving the first input value and the second input value. The circuitry includes a first adder circuit, a second adder circuit, a compressor circuit and a preprocessing stage. The first input value and the second input value are input to the first adder circuit to provide the first sum. The first input value and the second input value are input to the preprocessing stage to provide inputs to the compressor circuit. The compressor circuit provides first and second compressed output signals. The first and second compressed output signals are input to the second adder circuit to provide the second sum.


The preprocessing stage may include circuitry to programmably zero the first input value, so that the first sum is programmably settable to the second input value.


The compressor circuit may include respective separate circuitry for processing respective bit positions. For a respective bit position, the respective separate circuitry may have as inputs respective bits of each of the first and second input values, and respective next-less-significant bits of each of the first and second input values, and may further include an exclusive-OR gate combining the respective bits of each of the first and second input values. Output of the exclusive-OR gate in the respective separate circuitry for that respective bit position may be shared with respective separate circuitry for a next-more-significant bit position.


In the respective separate circuitry for the respective bit position, the respective next-less-significant bits of each of the first and second input values may be borrowed from respective separate circuitry for a next-less-significant bit position.


The first adder circuit may include a prefix tree having as inputs respective bits of the first and second input values, and providing as outputs respective carry values for each bit position. The first adder circuit also may include respective exclusive-OR gates for each bit position, each respective exclusive-OR gate having as inputs the respective carry value for that respective bit position, and the output of the exclusive-OR gate in that respective separate circuitry for that respective bit position.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Further features of the invention, its nature and various advantages will be apparent upon consideration of the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which like reference characters refer to like parts throughout, and in which:



FIG. 1 shows a simplified representation of a digital signal processing (DSP) block;



FIG. 2 shows an example of input processing circuitry that may be provided in an input stage of a DSP block to provide an input and that input multiplied by ‘3’;



FIG. 3 shows input processing circuitry according to an embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 4 shows an example of the internal structure of a portion of a compressor circuit;



FIG. 5 shows the internal structure of a portion of a first embodiment of a compressor circuit according to the present invention;



FIG. 6 shows the internal structure of a portion of a second embodiment of a compressor circuit according to the present invention;



FIG. 7 shows an example of the internal structure of a carry-propagate adder;



FIG. 8 shows a portion of a Kogge-Stone prefix tree;



FIG. 9 shows the internal structure of an embodiment of a carry-propagate adder according to the present invention;



FIG. 10 shows an example of how the generate output and the propagate output may be determined at each node in the first level of a Kogge-Stone prefix tree;



FIG. 11 shows an example of how the generate output and the propagate output may be determined at each node in each level beyond the first level of a Kogge-Stone prefix tree;



FIG. 12 shows how the generate and propagate structures of FIGS. 10 and 11 may be combined in a particular case according to an embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 13 shows how the generate and propagate structures of FIG. 12 may be simplified according to an embodiment of the present invention; and



FIG. 14 is a simplified block diagram of an exemplary system employing a programmable logic device incorporating the present invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The discussion that follows will be based on an example of a programmable integrated circuit device such as an FPGA. However, it should be noted that the subject matter disclosed herein may be used in any kind of fixed or programmable device.



FIG. 1 shows a simplified representation of a digital signal processing (DSP) block 100 of the type that may be found in many types of integrated circuit devices, including, e.g., a programmable device such as an FPGA. DSP block 100 may include a plurality of multipliers 101 followed by adder/accumulator circuitry 102 that may include multiple adders 112 and registers 122, as well as the ability to route out individual multiplication results without further combination. In addition, an input stage 103 may include various kinds of circuits for pre-multiplication manipulation of input signals, such as registers, shifters, multiplexers and adders (not shown).


As discussed above, it may be desirable to increase the radix of multipliers 101. A radix-4 multiplier with inputs X and Y would also need inputs 2X and 2Y. Such inputs could easily be provided by left-shifting of X and Y by one bit position. However, a radix-8 multiplier, which is commonly used in higher-radix operations, would require 3X and 3Y, which cannot be provided by shifting.



FIG. 2 shows an example of input processing circuitry 200 that may be provided in input stage 103 to provide both an input, and that input multiplied by ‘3’, without using a further multiplier. This example further includes pre-addition of two inputs, as may be used in the symmetrical filter implementation discussed above. Thus, the inputs A and B shown in FIG. 2 should not be considered the equivalent of inputs X and Y discussed above. Rather, the outputs of FIG. 2 correspond to either input X or input Y; that is, both input X and input Y could have been processed by such circuitry.


Adder 201 adds inputs A and B. Multiplexer 202 selects as its input either that sum 211 (A+B), or input B. Output 212 of input processing circuitry 200 therefore is either (A+B) or B, depending on the selection made by multiplexer 202. Output 212 also is routed both to adder 203 and to shifter 204. Shifter 204 shifts output 212 one bit to the left, effectively multiplying output 212 by ‘2’. Shifter output 214 is added to output 212 by adder 203. Output 213 is therefore either 3(A+B) or 3B, depending on the selection made by multiplexer 202.


While input processing circuitry 200 achieves the desired result of providing the product of ‘3’ and another input, where the input may be a single number, or two added numbers (as in the symmetrical filter example), its adder-multiplexer-adder structure is inefficient, consuming significant device area.


Improved input processing circuitry 300 according to an embodiment of the invention is shown in FIG. 3, and includes a compressor 301 followed by two adders 302, 303 which may be, e.g., carry-propagate adders. Input processing circuitry 300 also has a preprocessing stage including shifters 304 to provide inputs 2A and 2B from inputs A and B, as well as an AND-gate 305 to provide the selection function of multiplexer 202. AND gate 305 has a second input (not shown) which enables it to be used as a switch by inputting either a ‘0’ or a ‘1’ to that second input.


If AND-gate 305 is turned ON (by inputting ‘1’ to its second input), compressor 301 compresses inputs 2A, A, 2B and B to provide redundant-form sum and carry vectors 311, 321 representing 3(A+B), which are added by carry-propagate adder 302 to provide the output 3(A+B). If AND-gate 305 is turned OFF (by inputting ‘0’ to its second input, thereby programmably zeroing the ‘A’ input), adder 302 provides the output 3B.


At the same time, if AND-gate 305 is turned ON, adder 303 provides the output A+B, while if AND-gate 305 is turned OFF, adder 303 provides the output B. Although adder 303 may be a standard carry-propagate adder as noted above, it may be modified, as discussed in more detail below. Such modifications may require the input of A XOR B, which optionally may be provided at 331 by compressor 301, in a manner described below.


The structure shown in FIG. 3 replaces the adder-multiplexer-adder structure of FIG. 2 with a more efficient compressor-and-parallel-adders structure. In accordance with further implementations of embodiments of the invention, the circuitry may be made even more efficient.



FIG. 4 shows an example of the internal structure of three bits 401, 402, 403 of a 4-2 compressor for adding four inputs, as in FIG. 3, according to a known compressor architecture. While the compressor architecture shown in FIG. 3 is relatively efficient, efficiency can be improved for the particular operation at issue here, because the relationship of the inputs is such that adjacent bit positions share certain inputs. For example, XOR-gates 411 and 422 have the same inputs. Therefore, in the structure 500 shown in FIG. 5, XOR-gate 411 can be eliminated in favor of connection 501. Similarly, XOR-gates 412 and 423 have the same inputs, meaning that in structure 500, XOR-gate 412 can be eliminated in favor of connection 502. And XOR-gate 413 shares inputs with an unseen XOR-gate in the next bit to the right (in the orientation of the drawing), so that XOR-gate 413 can be eliminated in favor of connection 503. In the same way, connection 504 can eliminate an unseen XOR-gate in the next bit to the left.


In a further optimization shown in FIG. 6, the common inputs referred to in the previous paragraph may be replaced by connections 601, 602, 603, 604. Specifically, instead of inputting Ax-1 and Bx-1 to both bits 401, 402, Ax-1 and Bx-1 can be input to bit 402, and conducted to bit 401 by conductors 601. Similarly, instead of inputting Ax-2 and Bx-2 to both bits 402, 403, Ax-2 and Bx-2 can be input to bit 403, and conducted to bit 402 by conductors 602. Likewise, conductors 603 can bring the unseen Ax-3 and Bx-3 inputs to bit 403 from the unseen bit to the right of bit 403, and conductors 604 can bring the Ax and Bx inputs from bit 401 to the unseen bit to the left of bit 401.


As described above, FIG. 3 includes two carry-propagate adders 302, 303, one of which (carry-propagate adder 302) adds the sum and carry vectors representing 3(A+B) (or 3B), and one of which (carry-propagate adder 303) adds A and B. A conventional carry-propagate adder with inputs X and Y might have the structure 700 shown in FIG. 7, in which the various bits of M (710) and N (720) are input to prefix tree 701 (a Kogge-Stone prefix tree 800 is shown in FIG. 8, although many other prefix tree architectures may be suitable and may be used; the choice of prefix tree architecture may depend on the particular design) to provide carry outputs 711. The bits of M (710) and N (720) also are XORed together by XOR-gates 702, and that XOR result 712 is further XORed by XOR-gates 703 with the carry outputs 711. In the case of a carry-propagate adder following a compressor as in FIG. 3, the various M and N inputs would be the bits of the sum and carry outputs S and C, respectively.


In accordance with another embodiment of this invention, carry-propagate adder 303 can be simplified by eliminating XOR-gates 702, because the XOR results 712 for the A+B calculation are already available in compressor 301 at XOR-gates 421, 422, 423. Carry-propagate adder 303 would therefore have the structure shown in FIG. 9, in which the various M and N inputs would be the bits of A and B (cf., Ax, Bx, Ax-1, Bx-1, Ax-2, Bx-2, etc. in FIG. 6), respectively, and the various P inputs would be the bits of A XOR B (cf., ABx, ABx-1, ABx-2, etc. in FIG. 6).


Another embodiment of this invention relies on the fact that the inputs to carry-propagate adder 203 have a known relationship to each other—viz., that a second input is twice a first input or, in other words, the second input is the first input shifted left one bit. Thus each bit position of the second input can be represented by the next leftmost bit position of the first input, or each bit position of the first input can be represented by the next rightmost bit position of the second input. According to this embodiment, carry-propagate adder 203 can be simplified by altering its prefix tree as discussed below.


Referring again to Kogge-Stone prefix tree 800 shown in FIG. 8, each dot in FIG. 8 represents a generate node and propagate node. Typically, the propagate nodes are not output, while the generate nodes provide carry outputs 711 that are input to XOR-gates 703, as shown in FIG. 7. FIG. 10 shows examples of structures used in the first row of prefix tree 800. The two input bits at each bit position in that first row are used to create a generate output 1011 and a propagate output 1021. As shown in FIG. 10, generate output 1011 may be created by ANDing of the two inputs at 1010, and propagate output 1021 may be created by ORing of the two inputs at 1020. FIG. 10 is drawn showing the example of bit position 2 with inputs X2, Y2, but is the same for any bit position n (with inputs Xn, Yn).


Each subsequent node in prefix tree 800 may include structures as shown in FIG. 11 to calculate its generate output 1111 and its propagate output 1121 using the logic structures of FIG. 11. (In FIGS. 10 and 11, the index—(0, N, N+1)—refers to the level of prefix tree 800—i.e., the row in FIG. 8, where the top row has index 0—and the subscript refers to the bit position—i.e., the column in FIG. 8, where the rightmost row is bit position 0. As previously noted above, FIG. 10 represents any bit position n, with n=2 being shown. Similarly, FIG. 11 represents any bit position x, which is not the same as input X of FIG. 10.)


In the case where X+Y=A+2A, these structures can be simplified. To avoid confusion, let A=C, so that A+2A=C+(C<<1) (where “<<” denotes a left-shift operation, which for binary numbers is equivalent to multiplying by two). In such an addition, the bits of the two inputs would line up as follows:















C
5



C
4



C
3



C
2









C
5



C
4



C
3



C
2









It should be noted that in this example, while only four bits of each input are shown (from C5 down to C2), bits down to the 0th bit extend to the right and bits up to the highest bit required extend to the left. From here, it can be seen that any pair of the Xn, Yn inputs in FIG. 10 becomes Cn, Cn-1.


Taking then as an example bit position n=5, and inputting A5 and A4 (A=C as noted above) to the structures shown in FIG. 10 for row 0 of prefix tree 800, and then substituting those structures into the structures shown in FIG. 11 for row 1 of prefix tree 800, yields the logic structures shown in FIG. 12 for bit position n=5 for the combination of row 0 and row 1. Simplifying the logic structures of FIG. 12 yields the logic structures of FIG. 13. Thus, for the case where the two inputs of an adder are a number and twice that number, then the initial rows of the prefix tree can be substantially reduced, in terms of device area, to the structures of FIG. 13.


As can be seen from FIG. 8, a Kogge-Stone prefix tree has many more nodes in its early rows than in its later rows. It will be appreciated, then, that where an adder is built using a Kogge-Stone prefix tree, or any prefix tree with a similar architecture, the simplification of the initial rows according to the embodiment implemented in FIGS. 10-13 can reduce the overall device area consumed by the prefix tree by between about 15% and about 25%, depending on the particular prefix tree architecture used.


Thus it is seen that for implementing certain kinds of arithmetic operations, such as a choice between addition, and pre-addition for a multiplier, adder circuitry can be provided having reduced area, based on logical simplification or sharing of logic.


A PLD 180 configured to include arithmetic circuitry according to any implementation of the present invention may be used in many kinds of electronic devices. One possible use is in an exemplary data processing system 1800 shown in FIG. 14. Data processing system 1800 may include one or more of the following components: a processor 1801; memory 1102; I/O circuitry 1803; and peripheral devices 1804. These components are coupled together by a system bus 1805 and are populated on a circuit board 1806 which is contained in an end-user system 1807.


System 1800 can be used in a wide variety of applications, such as computer networking, data networking, instrumentation, video processing, digital signal processing, Remote Radio Head (RRH), or any other application where the advantage of using programmable or reprogrammable logic is desirable. PLD 180 can be used to perform a variety of different logic functions. For example, PLD 180 can be configured as a processor or controller that works in cooperation with processor 1801. PLD 180 may also be used as an arbiter for arbitrating access to a shared resources in system 1800. In yet another example, PLD 180 can be configured as an interface between processor 1801 and one of the other components in system 1800. It should be noted that system 1800 is only exemplary, and that the true scope and spirit of the invention should be indicated by the following claims.


Various technologies can be used to implement PLDs 180 as described above and incorporating this invention.


It will be understood that the foregoing is only illustrative of the principles of the invention, and that various modifications can be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention. For example, the various elements of this invention can be provided on a PLD in any desired number and/or arrangement. One skilled in the art will appreciate that the present invention can be practiced by other than the described embodiments, which are presented for purposes of illustration and not of limitation, and the present invention is limited only by the claims that follow.

Claims
  • 1. Circuitry accepting a first input value and a second input value and outputting (a) a first sum involving said first input value and said second input value, and (b) a second sum involving said first input value and said second input value, said circuitry comprising: a first adder circuit;a second adder circuit;a compressor circuit; anda preprocessing stage; wherein:said first input value and said second input value are input to said first adder circuit to provide said first sum;said first input value and said second input value are input to said preprocessing stage to provide inputs to said compressor circuit, said compressor circuit providing first and second compressed output signals;said first and second compressed output signals are input to said second adder circuit to provide said second sum.
  • 2. The circuitry of claim 1 wherein said first adder circuit and said second adder circuit are carry-propagate adders.
  • 3. The circuitry of claim 1 wherein: said preprocessing stage comprises circuitry to programmably zero said first input value; whereby:said first sum is programmably settable to said second input value.
  • 4. The circuitry of claim 3 wherein said circuitry to programmably zero said first input value comprises an AND gate having as inputs said first input value and ground.
  • 5. The circuitry of claim 1 wherein: said preprocessing stage comprises circuitry to double each of said first input value and said second input value for input to said compressor circuit along with said first input value and said second input value; whereby:said second sum is three times said first sum.
  • 6. The circuitry of claim 1 wherein: said compressor circuit comprises respective separate circuitry for processing respective bit positions;for a respective bit position, said respective separate circuitry has as inputs respective bits of each of said first and second input values, and respective next-less-significant bits of each of said first and second input values, and further includes an exclusive OR gate combining said respective bits of each of said first and second input values; andoutput of said exclusive OR gate in said respective separate circuitry for said respective bit position is shared with respective separate circuitry for a next-more-significant bit position.
  • 7. The circuitry of claim 6 wherein in said respective separate circuitry for said respective bit position, said respective next-less-significant bits of each of said first and second input values are borrowed from respective separate circuitry for a next-less-significant bit position.
  • 8. The circuitry of claim 6 wherein said first adder circuit comprises: a prefix tree having as inputs respective bits of said first and second input values, and providing as outputs respective carry values for each bit position; andrespective exclusive OR gates for each bit position, each respective exclusive OR gate having as inputs said respective carry value for said respective bit position, and said output of said exclusive OR gate in said respective separate circuitry for said respective bit position.
  • 9. The circuitry of claim 8 wherein said prefix tree is a Kogge-Stone prefix tree.
  • 10. Adder circuitry for two input values, wherein one of said two input values being twice another of said two input values, said adder circuitry comprising: respective input exclusive OR gates for each bit position, each respective input exclusive OR gate having as inputs respective bits of said two input values;a prefix tree having as inputs respective bits of said two input values, and providing as outputs respective carry values for each bit position; andrespective output exclusive OR gates for each bit position, each respective output exclusive OR gate having as inputs said respective carry value for said respective bit position, and said output of said respective input exclusive OR gate; wherein:said prefix tree is customized by constructing an initial level of said prefix tree based on each respective bit of said one of said two input values being identical to a respective next-less-significant bit of said another of said two input values.
  • 11. The adder circuitry of claim 10 wherein said constructing of said initial level comprises collapsing first and second levels of said prefix tree based on simplifying the logic structures of the first and second levels.
  • 12. The adder circuitry of claim 10 wherein said prefix tree is based on a Kogge-Stone prefix tree.
  • 13. Circuitry accepting a first input value at a first input port and a second input value at a second input port and outputting (a) a first sum involving said first input value and said second input value, and (b) a second sum involving said first input value and said second input value, said circuitry comprising: a first adder circuit;a second adder circuit;a compressor circuit coupled to said second adder circuit; anda preprocessing stage coupled between said first and second input ports, said compressor circuit, and said first adder circuit, wherein said preprocessing stage comprises circuitry to programmably zero said first input value; whereby:said first sum is programmably settable to said second input value and said second sum is programmable to be independent of said first input value.
  • 14. The circuitry of claim 13 wherein said circuitry to zero said first input value comprises an AND gate having as inputs said first input value and ground.
  • 15. The circuitry of claim 13 wherein: said first input value and said second input value are input to said first adder circuit to provide said first sum;said first input value and said second input value are input to said preprocessing stage to provide inputs to said compressor circuit, said compressor circuit providing first and second compressed output signals;said first and second compressed output signals are input to said second adder circuit to provide said second sum.
  • 16. The circuitry of claim 13 wherein said first adder circuit and said second adder circuit are carry-propagate adders.
  • 17. The circuitry of claim 13 wherein: said preprocessing stage comprises circuitry to double each of said first input value and said second input value for input to said compressor circuit along with said first input value and said second input value; whereby:said second sum is three times said first sum.
  • 18. The circuitry of claim 13 wherein: said compressor circuit comprises respective separate circuitry for processing respective bit positions;for a respective bit position, said respective separate circuitry has as inputs respective bits of each of said first and second input values, and respective next-less-significant bits of each of said first and second input values, and further includes an exclusive OR gate combining said respective bits of each of said first and second input values; andoutput of said exclusive OR gate in said respective separate circuitry for said respective bit position is shared with respective separate circuitry for a next-more-significant bit position.
  • 19. The circuitry of claim 18 wherein in said respective separate circuitry for said respective bit position, said respective next-less-significant bits of each of said first and second input values are borrowed from respective separate circuitry for a next-less-significant bit position.
  • 20. The circuitry of claim 18 wherein said first adder circuit comprises: a prefix tree having as inputs respective bits of said first and second input values, and providing as outputs respective carry values for each bit position; andrespective exclusive OR gates for each bit position, each respective exclusive OR gate having as inputs said respective carry value for said respective bit position, and said output of said exclusive OR gate in said respective separate circuitry for said respective bit position.
  • 21. The circuitry of claim 20 wherein said prefix tree is a Kogge-Stone prefix tree.
US Referenced Citations (400)
Number Name Date Kind
3473160 Wahlstrom Oct 1969 A
3697734 Booth et al. Oct 1972 A
3800130 Martinson et al. Mar 1974 A
4156927 McElroy et al. May 1979 A
4179746 Tubbs Dec 1979 A
4212076 Conners Jul 1980 A
4215406 Gomola et al. Jul 1980 A
4215407 Gomola et al. Jul 1980 A
4422155 Amir et al. Dec 1983 A
4484259 Palmer et al. Nov 1984 A
4521907 Amir et al. Jun 1985 A
4575812 Kloker et al. Mar 1986 A
4597053 Chamberlin Jun 1986 A
4616330 Betz Oct 1986 A
4623961 Mackiewicz Nov 1986 A
4682302 Williams Jul 1987 A
4718057 Venkitakrishnan et al. Jan 1988 A
4727508 Williams Feb 1988 A
4736335 Barban Apr 1988 A
4754421 Bosshart Jun 1988 A
4791590 Ku et al. Dec 1988 A
4799004 Mori Jan 1989 A
4823260 Imel et al. Apr 1989 A
4823295 Mader Apr 1989 A
4839847 Laprade Jun 1989 A
4871930 Wong et al. Oct 1989 A
4893268 Denman et al. Jan 1990 A
4908788 Fujiyama Mar 1990 A
4912345 Steele et al. Mar 1990 A
4918637 Morton Apr 1990 A
4967160 Quievy et al. Oct 1990 A
4982354 Takeuchi et al. Jan 1991 A
4991010 Hailey et al. Feb 1991 A
4994997 Martin et al. Feb 1991 A
4999803 Turrini et al. Mar 1991 A
5073863 Zhang Dec 1991 A
5081604 Tanaka Jan 1992 A
5122685 Chan et al. Jun 1992 A
5128559 Steele Jul 1992 A
5175702 Beraud et al. Dec 1992 A
5208491 Ebeling et al. May 1993 A
RE34363 Freeman Aug 1993 E
5267187 Hsieh et al. Nov 1993 A
5296759 Sutherland et al. Mar 1994 A
5338983 Agarwala Aug 1994 A
5339263 White Aug 1994 A
5349250 New Sep 1994 A
5357152 Jennings, III et al. Oct 1994 A
5371422 Patel et al. Dec 1994 A
5373461 Bearden et al. Dec 1994 A
5375079 Uramoto et al. Dec 1994 A
5381357 Wedgwood et al. Jan 1995 A
5404324 Colon-Benet Apr 1995 A
5424589 Dobbelaere et al. Jun 1995 A
5446651 Moyse et al. Aug 1995 A
5451948 Jekel Sep 1995 A
5452231 Butts et al. Sep 1995 A
5452375 Rousseau et al. Sep 1995 A
5457644 McCollum Oct 1995 A
5465226 Goto Nov 1995 A
5465375 Thepaut et al. Nov 1995 A
5483178 Costello et al. Jan 1996 A
5497498 Taylor Mar 1996 A
5500812 Saishi et al. Mar 1996 A
5500828 Doddington et al. Mar 1996 A
5523963 Hsieh et al. Jun 1996 A
5528550 Pawate et al. Jun 1996 A
5537601 Kimura et al. Jul 1996 A
5541864 Van Bavel et al. Jul 1996 A
5546018 New et al. Aug 1996 A
5550993 Ehlig et al. Aug 1996 A
5559450 Ngai et al. Sep 1996 A
5563526 Hastings et al. Oct 1996 A
5563819 Nelson Oct 1996 A
5570039 Oswald et al. Oct 1996 A
5570040 Lytle et al. Oct 1996 A
5572148 Lytle et al. Nov 1996 A
5581501 Sansbury et al. Dec 1996 A
5590350 Guttag et al. Dec 1996 A
5594366 Khong et al. Jan 1997 A
5594912 Brueckmann et al. Jan 1997 A
5596763 Guttag et al. Jan 1997 A
5606266 Pedersen Feb 1997 A
5617058 Adrian et al. Apr 1997 A
5631848 Laczko et al. May 1997 A
5633601 Nagaraj May 1997 A
5636150 Okamoto Jun 1997 A
5636368 Harrison et al. Jun 1997 A
5640578 Balmer et al. Jun 1997 A
5644519 Yatim et al. Jul 1997 A
5644522 Moyse et al. Jul 1997 A
5646545 Trimberger et al. Jul 1997 A
5646875 Taborn et al. Jul 1997 A
5648732 Duncan Jul 1997 A
5652903 Weng et al. Jul 1997 A
5655069 Ogawara et al. Aug 1997 A
5664192 Lloyd et al. Sep 1997 A
5689195 Cliff et al. Nov 1997 A
5696708 Leung Dec 1997 A
5729495 Madurawe Mar 1998 A
5740404 Baji Apr 1998 A
5744980 McGowan et al. Apr 1998 A
5744991 Jefferson et al. Apr 1998 A
5754459 Telikepalli May 1998 A
5761483 Trimberger Jun 1998 A
5764555 McPherson et al. Jun 1998 A
5768613 Asghar Jun 1998 A
5771186 Kodali et al. Jun 1998 A
5777912 Leung et al. Jul 1998 A
5784636 Rupp Jul 1998 A
5790446 Yu et al. Aug 1998 A
5794067 Kadowaki Aug 1998 A
5801546 Pierce et al. Sep 1998 A
5805477 Perner Sep 1998 A
5805913 Guttag et al. Sep 1998 A
5808926 Gorshtein et al. Sep 1998 A
5812479 Cliff et al. Sep 1998 A
5812562 Baeg Sep 1998 A
5815422 Dockser Sep 1998 A
5821776 McGowan Oct 1998 A
5825202 Tavana et al. Oct 1998 A
5838165 Chatter Nov 1998 A
5841684 Dockser Nov 1998 A
5847579 Trimberger Dec 1998 A
5847978 Ogura et al. Dec 1998 A
5847981 Kelley et al. Dec 1998 A
5859878 Phillips et al. Jan 1999 A
5869979 Bocchino Feb 1999 A
5872380 Rostoker et al. Feb 1999 A
5874834 New Feb 1999 A
5878250 LeBlanc Mar 1999 A
5880981 Kojima et al. Mar 1999 A
5892962 Cloutier Apr 1999 A
5894228 Reddy et al. Apr 1999 A
5898602 Rothman et al. Apr 1999 A
5931898 Khoury Aug 1999 A
5942914 Reddy et al. Aug 1999 A
5944774 Dent Aug 1999 A
5949710 Pass et al. Sep 1999 A
5951673 Miyata Sep 1999 A
5956265 Lewis Sep 1999 A
5959871 Pierzchala et al. Sep 1999 A
5960193 Guttag et al. Sep 1999 A
5961635 Guttag et al. Oct 1999 A
5963048 Harrison et al. Oct 1999 A
5963050 Young et al. Oct 1999 A
5968196 Ramamurthy et al. Oct 1999 A
5970254 Cooke et al. Oct 1999 A
5978260 Trimberger et al. Nov 1999 A
5982195 Cliff et al. Nov 1999 A
5986465 Mendel Nov 1999 A
5991788 Mintzer Nov 1999 A
5991898 Rajski et al. Nov 1999 A
5995748 Guttag et al. Nov 1999 A
5999015 Cliff et al. Dec 1999 A
5999990 Sharrit et al. Dec 1999 A
6005806 Madurawe et al. Dec 1999 A
6006321 Abbott Dec 1999 A
6009451 Burns Dec 1999 A
6018755 Gonikberg et al. Jan 2000 A
6020759 Heile Feb 2000 A
6021423 Nag et al. Feb 2000 A
6029187 Verbauwhede Feb 2000 A
6031763 Sansbury Feb 2000 A
6041339 Yu et al. Mar 2000 A
6041340 Mintzer Mar 2000 A
6052327 Reddy et al. Apr 2000 A
6052755 Terrill et al. Apr 2000 A
6052773 DeHon et al. Apr 2000 A
6055555 Boswell et al. Apr 2000 A
6064614 Khoury May 2000 A
6065131 Andrews et al. May 2000 A
6066960 Pedersen May 2000 A
6069487 Lane et al. May 2000 A
6072994 Phillips et al. Jun 2000 A
6073154 Dick Jun 2000 A
6075381 LaBerge Jun 2000 A
6084429 Trimberger Jul 2000 A
6085317 Smith Jul 2000 A
6091261 DeLange Jul 2000 A
6091765 Pietzold, III et al. Jul 2000 A
6094726 Gonion et al. Jul 2000 A
6097988 Tobias Aug 2000 A
6098163 Guttag et al. Aug 2000 A
6107820 Jefferson et al. Aug 2000 A
6107821 Kelem et al. Aug 2000 A
6107824 Reddy et al. Aug 2000 A
6108772 Sharangpani Aug 2000 A
6130554 Kolze et al. Oct 2000 A
6140839 Kaviani et al. Oct 2000 A
6144980 Oberman Nov 2000 A
6154049 New Nov 2000 A
6157210 Zaveri et al. Dec 2000 A
6163788 Chen et al. Dec 2000 A
6167415 Fischer et al. Dec 2000 A
6175849 Smith Jan 2001 B1
6215326 Jefferson et al. Apr 2001 B1
6226735 Mirsky May 2001 B1
6242947 Trimberger Jun 2001 B1
6243729 Staszewski Jun 2001 B1
6246258 Lesea Jun 2001 B1
6260053 Maulik et al. Jul 2001 B1
6279021 Takano et al. Aug 2001 B1
6286024 Yano et al. Sep 2001 B1
6314442 Suzuki Nov 2001 B1
6314551 Borland Nov 2001 B1
6321246 Page et al. Nov 2001 B1
6323680 Pedersen et al. Nov 2001 B1
6327605 Arakawa et al. Dec 2001 B2
6346824 New Feb 2002 B1
6351142 Abbott Feb 2002 B1
6353843 Chehrazi et al. Mar 2002 B1
6359468 Park et al. Mar 2002 B1
6360240 Takano et al. Mar 2002 B1
6362650 New et al. Mar 2002 B1
6366944 Hossain et al. Apr 2002 B1
6367003 Davis Apr 2002 B1
6369610 Cheung et al. Apr 2002 B1
6377970 Abdallah et al. Apr 2002 B1
6407576 Ngai et al. Jun 2002 B1
6407694 Cox et al. Jun 2002 B1
6427157 Webb Jul 2002 B1
6434587 Liao et al. Aug 2002 B1
6438569 Abbott Aug 2002 B1
6438570 Miller Aug 2002 B1
6446107 Knowles Sep 2002 B1
6453382 Heile Sep 2002 B1
6467017 Ngai et al. Oct 2002 B1
6480980 Koe Nov 2002 B2
6483343 Faith et al. Nov 2002 B1
6487575 Oberman Nov 2002 B1
6523055 Yu et al. Feb 2003 B1
6523057 Savo et al. Feb 2003 B1
6529931 Besz Mar 2003 B1
6531888 Abbott Mar 2003 B2
6538470 Langhammer et al. Mar 2003 B1
6539413 Goldovsky Mar 2003 B1
6542000 Black et al. Apr 2003 B1
6556044 Langhammer et al. Apr 2003 B2
6557092 Callen Apr 2003 B1
6571268 Giacalone et al. May 2003 B1
6573749 New et al. Jun 2003 B2
6574762 Karimi et al. Jun 2003 B1
6578060 Chen et al. Jun 2003 B2
6591283 Conway et al. Jul 2003 B1
6591357 Mirsky Jul 2003 B2
6600495 Boland et al. Jul 2003 B1
6600788 Dick et al. Jul 2003 B1
6628140 Langhammer et al. Sep 2003 B2
6687722 Larsson et al. Feb 2004 B1
6692534 Wang et al. Feb 2004 B1
6700581 Baldwin et al. Mar 2004 B2
6725441 Keller et al. Apr 2004 B1
6728901 Rajski et al. Apr 2004 B1
6731133 Feng et al. May 2004 B1
6732134 Rosenberg May 2004 B1
6744278 Liu et al. Jun 2004 B1
6745254 Boggs et al. Jun 2004 B2
6763367 Kwon et al. Jul 2004 B2
6771094 Langhammer et al. Aug 2004 B1
6774669 Liu et al. Aug 2004 B1
6781408 Langhammer Aug 2004 B1
6781410 Pani et al. Aug 2004 B2
6788104 Singh et al. Sep 2004 B2
6801924 Green et al. Oct 2004 B1
6836839 Master et al. Dec 2004 B2
6874079 Hogenauer Mar 2005 B2
6889238 Johnson May 2005 B2
6904471 Boggs et al. Jun 2005 B2
6915322 Hong Jul 2005 B2
6924663 Masui et al. Aug 2005 B2
6963890 Dutta et al. Nov 2005 B2
6971083 Farrugia et al. Nov 2005 B1
6978287 Langhammer Dec 2005 B1
6983300 Ferroussat Jan 2006 B2
7020673 Ozawa Mar 2006 B2
7024446 Langhammer et al. Apr 2006 B2
7047272 Giacalone et al. May 2006 B2
7062526 Hoyle Jun 2006 B1
7093204 Oktem et al. Aug 2006 B2
7107305 Deng et al. Sep 2006 B2
7113969 Green et al. Sep 2006 B1
7181484 Stribaek et al. Feb 2007 B2
7230451 Langhammer Jun 2007 B1
7313585 Winterrowd Dec 2007 B2
7343388 Burney et al. Mar 2008 B1
7395298 Debes et al. Jul 2008 B2
7401109 Koc et al. Jul 2008 B2
7409417 Lou Aug 2008 B2
7415542 Hennedy et al. Aug 2008 B2
7421465 Rarick et al. Sep 2008 B1
7428565 Fujimori Sep 2008 B2
7428566 Siu et al. Sep 2008 B2
7430578 Debes et al. Sep 2008 B2
7430656 Sperber et al. Sep 2008 B2
7447310 Koc et al. Nov 2008 B2
7472155 Simkins et al. Dec 2008 B2
7508936 Eberle et al. Mar 2009 B2
7536430 Guevokian et al. May 2009 B2
7567997 Simkins et al. Jul 2009 B2
7590676 Langhammer Sep 2009 B1
7646430 Brown Elliott et al. Jan 2010 B2
7650374 Gura et al. Jan 2010 B1
7668896 Lutz et al. Feb 2010 B2
7719446 Rosenthal et al. May 2010 B2
7720898 Driker et al. May 2010 B2
7769797 Cho et al. Aug 2010 B2
7814136 Verma et al. Oct 2010 B1
7814137 Mauer Oct 2010 B1
7822799 Langhammer et al. Oct 2010 B1
7836117 Langhammer et al. Nov 2010 B1
7865541 Langhammer Jan 2011 B1
7917567 Mason et al. Mar 2011 B1
7930335 Gura Apr 2011 B2
7930336 Langhammer Apr 2011 B2
8024394 Prokopenko Sep 2011 B2
8090758 Shimanek et al. Jan 2012 B1
8112466 Minz et al. Feb 2012 B2
8412756 Langhammer Apr 2013 B1
8447800 Dockser et al. May 2013 B2
8468192 Langhammer Jun 2013 B1
8484265 Langhammer Jul 2013 B1
8510354 Langhammer Aug 2013 B1
8539016 Langhammer et al. Sep 2013 B1
8543634 Xu et al. Sep 2013 B1
8577951 Langhammer Nov 2013 B1
8620980 Mauer et al. Dec 2013 B1
8645449 Langhammer et al. Feb 2014 B1
8645450 Choe et al. Feb 2014 B1
8645451 Langhammer Feb 2014 B2
8650231 Langhammer Feb 2014 B1
8650236 Choe Feb 2014 B1
8706790 Langhammer Apr 2014 B1
8751551 Streicher et al. Jun 2014 B2
8762443 Kurtz Jun 2014 B1
8812576 Mauer Aug 2014 B1
8949298 Langhammer Feb 2015 B1
8959137 Langhammer Feb 2015 B1
20010023425 Oberman et al. Sep 2001 A1
20010029515 Mirsky Oct 2001 A1
20010037352 Hong Nov 2001 A1
20020002573 Landers et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020032713 Jou et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020038324 Page et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020049798 Wang et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020078114 Wang et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020089348 Langhammer Jul 2002 A1
20020116434 Nancekievill Aug 2002 A1
20020143841 Farooqui et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020174158 Sutherland Nov 2002 A1
20030065699 Burns Apr 2003 A1
20030088757 Lindner et al. May 2003 A1
20040064770 Xin Apr 2004 A1
20040083412 Corbin et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040103133 Gurney May 2004 A1
20040122882 Zakharov et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040148321 Guevorkian et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040172439 Lin Sep 2004 A1
20040178818 Crotty et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040193981 Clark et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040267857 Abel et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040267863 Bhushan et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050038842 Stoye Feb 2005 A1
20050144212 Simkins et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050144215 Simkins et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050144216 Simkins et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050166038 Wang et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050187997 Zheng et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050187999 Zheng et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050262175 Iino et al. Nov 2005 A1
20060020655 Lin Jan 2006 A1
20060112160 Ishii et al. May 2006 A1
20070083585 St Denis et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070185951 Lee et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070185952 Langhammer et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070241773 Hutchings et al. Oct 2007 A1
20080133627 Langhammer et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080159441 Liao et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080183783 Tubbs Jul 2008 A1
20090083358 Allen Mar 2009 A1
20090113186 Kato et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090172052 DeLaquil et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090182795 Dobbek et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090187615 Abe et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090228689 Muff et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090292750 Reyzin et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090300088 Michaels et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090300323 Hessel et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100098189 Oketani Apr 2010 A1
20100146022 Swartzlander et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100191939 Muff et al. Jul 2010 A1
20110106868 Lutz May 2011 A1
20110137970 Dockser et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110264719 Mortensen Oct 2011 A1
20120166512 Wong et al. Jun 2012 A1
20130138711 Sugisawa May 2013 A1
20140067895 Wang Mar 2014 A1
20140089371 De Dinechin et al. Mar 2014 A1
20160079960 Berscheid Mar 2016 A1
20160283196 Langhammer Sep 2016 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (49)
Number Date Country
0 158 430 Oct 1985 EP
0 326 415 Aug 1989 EP
0 380 456 Aug 1990 EP
0 411 491 Feb 1991 EP
0 419 105 Mar 1991 EP
0 461 798 Dec 1991 EP
0 498 066 Aug 1992 EP
0 555 092 Aug 1993 EP
0 606 653 Jul 1994 EP
0 657 803 Jun 1995 EP
0 660 227 Jun 1995 EP
0 668 659 Aug 1995 EP
0 721 159 Jul 1996 EP
0 905 906 Mar 1999 EP
0 909 028 Apr 1999 EP
0 927 393 Jul 1999 EP
0 992 885 Apr 2000 EP
1 031 934 Aug 2000 EP
1 049 025 Nov 2000 EP
1 058 185 Dec 2000 EP
1 220 108 Jul 2002 EP
2 283 602 May 1995 GB
2 286 737 Aug 1995 GB
2 318 198 Apr 1998 GB
61-237133 Oct 1986 JP
63-216131 Aug 1988 JP
4-332036 Nov 1992 JP
5-134851 Jun 1993 JP
06-187129 Jul 1994 JP
7-135447 May 1995 JP
11-296345 Oct 1999 JP
2000-259394 Sep 2000 JP
2002-108606 Apr 2002 JP
2002-251281 Sep 2002 JP
WO9527243 Oct 1995 WO
WO9628774 Sep 1996 WO
WO9708606 Mar 1997 WO
WO9812629 Mar 1998 WO
WO9832071 Jul 1998 WO
WO9838741 Sep 1998 WO
WO9922292 May 1999 WO
WO9931574 Jun 1999 WO
WO9956394 Nov 1999 WO
WO0051239 Aug 2000 WO
WO0052824 Sep 2000 WO
WO0113562 Feb 2001 WO
WO 2005066832 Jul 2005 WO
WO 2005101190 Oct 2005 WO
WO 2010102007 Sep 2010 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (89)
Entry
Altera, “DSP Blocks in Stratix III Devices,” Chapter 5, pp. 1-42, Mar. 2010.
Altera Corporation, “Statix II Device Handbook, Chapter 6—DSP Blocks in Stratix II Devices,” v1.1, Jul. 2004.
Altera Corporation, “Digital Signal Processing (DSP),” Stratix Device Handbook, vol. 2, Chapter 6 and Chapter 7, v1.1 (Sep. 2004).
Altera Corporation, “DSP Blocks in Stratix II and Stratix II GX Devices,” Stratix II Device Handbook, vol. 2, Chapter 6, v4.0 (Oct. 2005).
Altera Corporation, “FIR Compiler: MegaCore® Function User Guide,” version 3.3.0, rev. 1, pp. 3-11 through 3-15 (Oct. 2005).
Altera Corporation, “Advanced Synthesis Cookbook: A Design Guide for Stratix II, Stratix III and Stratix IV Devices,” Document Version 3.0, 112 pgs., May 2008.
Amos, D., “PLD architectures match DSP algorithms,” Electronic Product Design, vol. 17, No. 7, Jul. 1996, pp. 30, 32.
Analog Devices, Inc., The Applications Engineering Staff of Analog Devices, DSP Division, Digital Signal Processing Applications Using the ADSP-2100 Family (edited by Amy Mar), 1990, pp. 141-192).
Andrejas, J., et al., “Reusable DSP functions in FPGAs,” Field-Programmable Logic and Applications. Roadmap to Reconfigurable Computing. 10th International Conference, FPL 2000. Proceedings (Lecture Notes in Computer Science vol. 1896), Aug. 27-30, 2000, pp. 456-461.
Aoki, T., “Signed-weight arithmetic and its application to a field-programmable digital filter architecture,” IEICE Transactions on Electronics , 1999 , vol. E82C, No. 9, Sep. 1999, pp. 1687-1698.
Ashour, M.A., et al., “An FPGA implementation guide for some different types of serial-parallel multiplier-structures,” Microelectronics Journal , vol. 31, No. 3, 2000, pp. 161-168.
Berg, B.L., et al.“Designing Power and Area Efficient Multistage FIR Decimators with Economical Low Order Filters,” ChipCenter Technical Note, Dec. 2001.
Bursky, D., “Programmable Logic Challenges Traditional ASIC SoC Designs”, Electronic Design, Apr. 15, 2002.
Chhabra, A. et al., Texas Instruments Inc., “A Block Floating Point Implementation on the TMS320C54x DSP”, Application Report SPRA610, Dec. 1999, pp. 1-10.
Colet, P., “When DSPs and FPGAs meet: Optimizing image processing architectures,” Advanced Imaging, vol. 12, No. 9, Sep. 1997, pp. 14, 16, 18.
Crookes, D., et al., “Design and implementation of a high level programming environment for FPGA-based image processing,” IEE Proceedings-Vision, Image and Signal Processing, vol. 147, No. 4, Aug. 2000, pp. 377-384.
Debowski, L., et al., “A new flexible architecture of digital control systems based on DSP and complex CPLD technology for power conversion applications,” PCIM 2000: Europe Official Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh International Intelligent Motion Conference, Jun. 6-8, 2000, pp. 281-286.
deDinechin, F. et al., “Large multipliers with less DSP blocks,” retrieved from http://hal-ens-lyon.archives-ouvertes.fr/ensl-00356421/en/, 9 pgs., available online Jan. 2009.
de Dinechin F.,et al., “FPGA-Specific Custom Arithmetic Datapath Design: LIP Research Report RR2010-34,” Dec. 2010, 8 pages.
Dick, C., et al., “Configurable logic for digital communications: some signal processing perspectives,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 37, No. 8, Aug. 1999, pp. 107-111.
Do, T.-T., et al., “A flexible implementation of high-performance FIR filters on Xilinx FPGAs,” Field-Programmable Logic and Applications: From FPGAs to Computing Paradigm. 8th International Workshop, FPL'98. Proceedings, Hartenstein, R.W., et al., eds., Aug. 31-Sep. 3, 1998, pp. 441-445.
Farooqui, A., et al., “General Data-Path Organization of a MAC unit for VLSI Implementation of DSP Processors,” ISCAS '98, Part 2, May 31, 1998-Jun. 3, 1998, pp. 260-263.
Fujioka, Y., et al., “240 MOPS Reconfigurable Parallel VLSI Processor for Robot Control”, Proceedings of the 1992 International Conference on Industrial Electronics, Control, Instrumentation, and Automation, vol. 3, pp. 1385-1390, Nov. 9-13, 1992.
Gaffer, A.A., et al., “Floating-Point Bitwidth Analysis via Automatic Differentiation,” IEEE Conference on Field Programmable Technology, Hong Kong, Dec. 2002.
Govindu, G. et al., “A Library of Parameterizable Floating-Point Cores for FPGAs and Their Application to Scientific Computing,” Proc Int'l Conf. Eng. Reconfigurable Systems and Algorithms (ERSA'05), Jun. 2005.
Govindu, G. et al., “Analysis of High-performance Floating-point Arithmetic on FPGAs,” Proceedings of the 18th International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium (PDPS'04) pp. 149-156, Apr. 2004.
Guccione, S.A.,“Run-time Reconfiguration at Xilinx,” Parallel and distributed processing: 15 IPDPS 2000 workshops, Rolim, J., ed., May 1-5, 2000, p. 873.
Hauck, S., “The Future of Reconfigurable Systems,” Keynote Address, 5th Canadian Conference on Field Programmable Devices, Jun. 1998, http:--www.ee.washington.edu-people-faculty-hauck-publications-ReconfigFuture.PDF.
Haynes, S.D., et al., “Configurable multiplier blocks for embedding in FPGAs,” Electronicas Letters, vol. 34, No. 7, pp. 638-639 (Apr. 2, 1998).
Heysters, P.M., et al., “Mapping of DSP algorithms on field programmable function arrays,” Field-Programmable Logic and Applications. Roadmap to Reconfigurable Computing. 10th International Conference, FPL 2000. Proceedings (Lecture Notes in Computer Science vol. 1896), Aug. 27-30, 2000, pp. 400-411.
Huang, J., et al., “Simulated Performance of 1000BASE-T Receiver with Different Analog Front End Designs,” Proceedings of the 35th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, and Computers, Nov. 4-7, 2001.
IEEE Standard for Binary Floating-Point Arithmetic, ANSI/IEEE Standard, Std 754, 1985, pp. 1-14.
IEEE Standard for Floating-Point Arithmetic, IEEE Std 754, 2008, pp. 1-58.
“Implementing Multipliers in FLEX 10K EABs”, Altera, Mar. 1996.
“Implementing Logic with the Embedded Array in FLEX 10K Devices”, Altera, May 2001, ver. 2.1.
Jinghua Li, “Design a pocket multi-bit multiplier in FPGA,” 1996 2nd International Conference on ASIC Proceedings IEEE Cat. No. 96TH8140), Oct. 21-24, 1996, pp. 275-279.
Jones, G., “Field-programmable digital signal conditioning,” Electronic Product Design, vol. 21, No. 6, Jun. 2000, pp. C36-C38.
Karlstrom, K., et al., “High Performance, Low Latency FPGA based Floating Point Adder and Multiplier Units in a Virtex 4,” Norchip Conf., pp. 31-34, 2006.
Kiefer, R., et al., “Performance comparison of software-FPGA hardware partitions for a DSP application,” 14th Australian Microelectronics Conference. Microelectronics: Technology Today for the Future. MICRO '97 Proceedings, Sep. 28-Oct. 1, 1997, pp. 88-93.
Kim, Y., et al., “Fast GPU Implementation for the Solution of Tridiagonal Matrix Systems,” Journal of Korean Institute of Information Scientists and Engineers, vol. 32, No. 12, pp. 692-704, Dec. 2005.
Kramberger, I., “DSP acceleration using a reconfigurable FPGA,” ISIE '99. Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics (Cat. No. 99TH8465), vol. 3 , Jul. 12-16, 1999, pp. 1522-1525.
Langhammer, M., “How to implement DSP in programmable logic,” Elettronica Oggi, No. 266 , Dec. 1998, pp. 113-115.
Langhammer, “Floating Point Datapath Synthesis for FPGAs,” IEEE International Conference on Field Programmable Logic and Applications, 2008 (FPL 2008), pp. 355-360 (Sep. 8-10, 2008).
Langhammer, M., “Implementing a DSP in Programmable Logic,” Online EE Times, May 1998, http:--www.eetimes.com-editorial-1998-coverstory9805.html.
Lazaravich, B.V., “Function block oriented field programmable logic arrays,” Motorola, Inc. Technical Developments, vol. 18, Mar. 1993, pp. 10-11.
Lattice Semiconductor Corp, ORCA® FPGA Express™ Interface Manual: ispLEVER® Version 3.0, 2002.
Lucent Technologies, Microelectronics Group,“Implementing and Optimizing Multipliers in ORCA™ FPGAs,”, Application Note.AP97-008FGPA, Feb. 1997.
Lund, D., et al., “A new development system for reconfigurable digital signal processing,” First International Conference on 3G Mobile Communication Technologies (Conf. Publ. No. 471), Mar. 27-29, 2000, pp. 306-310.
Martinson, L. et al., “Digital matched Filtering with Pipelined Floating Point Fast Fourier Transforms (FFT's)” IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, vol. ASSP-23, No. 2, pp. 222-234, Apr. 1975.
Miller, N.L., et al., “Reconfigurable integrated circuit for high performance computer arithmetic,” Proceedings of the 1998 IEE Colloquium on Evolvable Hardware Systems (Digest), No. 233, 1998, pp. 2-1-2-4.
Mintzer, L., “Xilinx FPGA as an FFT processor,” Electronic Engineering, vol. 69, No. 845, May 1997, pp. 81, 82, 84.
Faura et al., “A Novel Mixed Signal Programmable Device With On-Chip Microprocessor,” Custom Integrated Circuits Conference, 1997. Proceedings of the IEEE 1997 Santa Clara, CA, USA, May 5, 1997, pp. 103-106.
Nakasato, N., et al., “Acceleration of Hydrosynamical Simulations using a FPGA board” The Institute of Electronics Information and Communication Technical Report CPSY2005-47, vol. 105, No. 515, Jan. 17, 2006.
Nedjah, N., et al., “Fast Less Recursive Hardware for Large Number Multiplication Using Karatsuba-Ofman's Algorithm,” Computer and Information Sciences—ISCIS, pp. 43-50, 2003.
Nozal, L., et al., “A new vision system: programmable logic devices and digital signal processor architecture (PLD+DSP),” Proceedings IECON '91. 1991 International Conference on Industrial Electronics, Control and Instrumentation (Cat. No. 91CH2976-9), vol. 3, Oct. 28-Nov. 1, 1991, pp. 2014-2018.
Osana, Y., et al., “Hardware-resource Utilization Analysis on an FPGA-Based Biochemical Simulator ReCSiP”, The Institute of Electronics Information and Communication Technical Report CPSY2005-63, vol. 105, No. 516, Jan. 18, 2006.
Papenfuss, J.R, et al., “Implementation of a real-time, frequency selective, RF channel simulator using a hybrid DSP-FPGA architecture,” RAWCON 2000: 2000 IEEE Radio and Wireless Conference (Cat. No. 00EX404), Sep. 10-13, 2000, pp. 135-138.
Parhami, B., “Configurable arithmetic arrays with data-driven control,” 34th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers, vol. 1, 2000, pp. 89-93.
“The QuickDSP Design Guide”, Quicklogic, Aug. 2001, revision B.
“QuickDSP™ Family Data Sheet”, Quicklogic, Aug. 7, 2001, revision B.
Rangasayee, K., “Complex PLDs let you produce efficient arithmetic designs,” EDN (European Edition), vol. 41, No. 13, Jun. 20, 1996, pp. 109, 110, 112, 114, 116.
Rosado, A., et al., “A high-speed multiplier coprocessor unit based on FPGA,” Journal of Electrical Engineering, vol. 48, No. 11-12, 1997, pp. 298-302.
Santillan-Q., G.F., et al., “Real-time integer convolution implemented using systolic arrays and a digit-serial architecture in complex programmable logic devices,” Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Design of Mixed-Mode Integrated Circuits and Applications (Cat. No. 99EX303), Jul. 26-28, 1999, pp. 147-150.
Texas Instruments Inc., “TMS320C54x DSP Reference Set, vol. 1: CPU and Peripherals”, Literature No. SPRU131F, Apr. 1999, pp. 2-1 through 2-16 and 4-1 through 4-29.
Thapliyal, H., et al., “Combined Integer and Floating Point Multiplication Architecture (CIFM) for FPGSs and Its Reversible Logic Implementation”, Proceedings MWSCAS 2006, Puerto Rico, 5 pages, Aug. 2006.
Thapliyal, H., et al., “Combined Integer and Variable Precision (CIVP) Floating Point Multiplication Architecture for FPGAs”, Proceedings of the 2007 International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Processing Techniques and Applications (PDPTA'07) Las Vegas, US, vol. 1, pp. 449-450, Jun. 2007.
Tisserand, A., et al., “An on-line arithmetic based FPGA for low power custom computing,” Field Programmable Logic and Applications, 9th International Workshop, FPL'99, Proceedings (Lecture Notes in Computer Science vol. 1673), Lysaght, P., et al., eds., Aug. 30-Sep. 1, 1999, pp. 264-273.
Tralka, C., “Symbiosis of DSP and PLD,” Elektronik, vol. 49, No. 14 , Jul. 11, 2000, pp. 84-96.
Underwood, K. “FPGAs vs. CPUs: Trends in Peak Floating-Point Performance,” Proceedings of the 2004 ACM-SIGDA 12th International Symposium on Field Programmable Gate Arrays, pp. 171-180, Feb. 22-24, 2004.
Valls, J., et al., “A Study About FPGA-Based Digital Filters,” Signal Processing Systems, 1998, SIPS 98, 1998 IEEE Workshop, Oct. 10, 1998, pp. 192-201.
“Virtex-II 1.5V Field-Programmable Gate Arrays”, Xilinx, Jan. 25, 2001, module 2 of 4.
“Virtex-II 1.5V Field-Programmable Gate Arrays”, Xilinx, Apr. 2, 2001, module 1 of 4.
“Virtex-II 1.5V Field-Programmable Gate Arrays”, Xilinx, Apr. 2, 2001, module 2 of 4.
Vladimirova, T. et al., “Floating-Point Mathematical Co-Processor for a Single-Chip On-Board Computer,” MAPLD'03 Conference, D5, Sep. 2003.
Wajih, E.-H.Y. et al., “Efficient Hardware Architecture of Recursive Karatsuba-Ofman Multiplier,” 3rd International Conference on Design and Technology of Integrated Systems in Nanoscale Era, 6 pgs, Mar. 2008.
Walters, A.L., “A Scaleable FIR Filter Implementation Using 32-bit Floating-Point Complex Arithmetic on ,a FPGA Based Custom Computing Platform,” Allison L. Walters, Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Jan. 30, 1998.
Weisstein, E.W., “Karatsuba Multiplication,” MathWorld—A Wolfram Web Resource (Dec. 9, 2007), accessed Dec. 11, 2007 at http:--mathworld.wolfram.com-KaratsubaMultiplication.html.
Wenzel, L., “Field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs) to replace digital signal processor integrated circuits,” Elektronik , vol. 49, No. 5, Mar. 7, 2000, pp. 78-86.
“Xilinx Unveils New FPGA Architecture to Enable High-Performance, 10 Million System Gate Designs”, Xilinx, Jun. 22, 2000.
“Xilinx Announces DSP Algorithms, Tools and Features for Virtex-II Architecture”, Xilinx, Nov. 21, 2000.
Xilinx Inc., “Virtex-II 1.5V Field-Programmable Gate Arrays”, Advance Product Specification, DS031-2 (v1.9), Nov. 29, 2001, Module 2 of 4, pp. 1-39.
Xilinx Inc., “Using Embedded Multipliers”, Virtex-II Platform FPGA Handbook, UG002 (v1.3), Dec. 3, 2001, pp. 251-257.
Xilinx, Inc., “A 1D Systolic FIR,” copyright 1994-2002, downloaded from http:--www.iro.umontreal.ca-˜aboulham-F6221-Xilinx%20A%201D%20systolic%20FIR.htm.
Xilinx, Inc., “The Future of FPGA's,” White Paper, available Nov. 14, 2005 for download from http:--www.xilinx.com-prs—rls,5yrwhite.htm.
Xilinx Inc., “XtremeDSP Design Considerations User Guide,” v 1.2, Feb. 4, 2005.
Xilinx Inc., “Complex Multiplier v2.0”, DS291 Product Specification/Datasheet, Nov. 2004.
Xilinx, Inc., “Virtex-5 ExtremeDSP Design Considerations,” User Guide UG193, v2.6, 114 pages, Oct. 2007.
Xilinx, Inc., “Implementing Barrel Shifters Using Multipliers”, p. 1-4, Aug. 17, 2004.
Zhou, G. et al., “Efficient and High-Throughput Implementations of AES-GCM on FPGAs,” International Conference on Field-Programmable Technology, 8 pgs., Dec. 2007.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20160283196 A1 Sep 2016 US