Healthcare acquired infection (HAI) has been recognized as a significant cause of preventable mortality and morbidity. In the United States, HAI annually costs nearly 99,000 lives and billions of dollars in additional treatment and hospitalization. Klevens, et al., Estimating Health Care-Associated Infection and Deaths in U.S. Hospitals, 2002, Public Health Reports, Vol. 122, p. 160, 2007. Contamination of intravascular catheters, surgical sites and invasive procedure sites, frequently leads to device removal and replacement, prolonged parenteral antimicrobial therapy, and extended hospitalizations and rehabilitation.
The spread of multi-antimicrobial resistant organisms frequently are spread by healthcare providers' hands or medical equipment, from one colonized or infected patient to other susceptible patients. Surgical site infections may result from inadequate antiseptic preparations of the skin. Widespread use of chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) for routine washing and wiping of pre-operative sites, has led to the increased incidence of resistant Staphyloccus aureus, both to methicillin (MRSA) and CHG, in some hospital environments.
The detailed description is set forth with reference to the accompanying figures. In the figures, the left-most digit(s) of a reference number identifies the figure in which the reference number first appears. The use of the same reference numbers in different figures indicates similar or identical items or features.
This disclosure describes medical combined cap applicators and protective cap devices designed to reduce and/or prevent infections. In one embodiment, the disclosure describes example combined cap applicators. The combined cap applicators may comprise a first cap and a second cap detachably coupled together. The caps are separable to expose a receptacle or interior cavity within each cap. Each receptacle within each cap containing a permeable foam applicator material that may be coated or filled with, for example, a cleansing, antiseptic or antimicrobial composition.
In another embodiment, the disclosure describes example protective cap devices for multiple dose/use vials. The protective cap device may contain a foam material impregnated with an antimicrobial composition that, upon application of the protective cap device to a multiple dose/use vial, bathes the metal ring and elastomeric stopper of the vial in the antimicrobial composition. Thereby, reducing and/or preventing the presence of one or more contaminants upon a multiple dose/use vial. Furthermore, the foam material is constructed so as to prevent contamination of the contents of a multiple use/dose vial.
The detailed discussion below begins with a section entitled “Example Antimicrobial Composition”, which describes in detail an example antimicrobial composition that may be included in the medical applicators and devices described herein. Next, the disclosure describes the “Example Combined Cap Applicators.” Next, the disclosure describes “Example Process” for using an example combine cap applicator. The next sections entitled “Example Protective Cap Device” and “Example Packaging of Protective Cap Device” describes in detail several example capping devices for use on multiple dose/use vials. Next, the disclosure describes “Other Cap Devices.” Finally, the disclosure concludes with a brief “Conclusion.”
This overview, including section titles, is provided to introduce a selection of concepts in a simplified form that are further described below. The overview is provided for the reader's convenience and is not intended to limit the scope of the claims, nor the proceeding sections.
Example Antimicrobial Composition
In one example embodiment, antimicrobial compositions that may be used in connection with the approaches described herein may include those described in, for example, U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/412,375, filed Nov. 10, 2010 to Tennican et al., which is incorporated herein by reference. For example, the antimicrobial compositions may include water (H2O), a strong and non-toxic chelating agent such as ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)(e.g., disodium EDTA, calcium disodium EDTA, magnesium EDTA, potassium EDTA, gallium EDTA,) or sodium citrate (or acids, salts, derivatives, or other forms of EDTA or sodium citrate), a short-chain monohydric alcohol (e.g., ethanol with a molecular formula of C2H5OH and an empirical formula of C2H6O), and a strong, small molecule oxidizing agent such as hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). In one specific example, the compositions may consist essentially of water, EDTA, ethanol, and hydrogen peroxide. Additional ingredients can include thickeners, gellants, surfactants, foamers and/or foam stabilizers. However, in other examples, other antimicrobial compositions may be used in combination with the applicators and devices described in this disclosure.
In one embodiment, the present application provides an antimicrobial composition comprising (a) water; (b) a low molecular weight alcohol; (c) a peroxide or peroxide-generating agent; and (d) a chelating agent.
In some embodiments, the alcohol in the antimicrobial composition comprises ethanol. In some embodiments, the alcohol is present in the antimicrobial composition at a concentration of from about 1% to about 95% by volume. In other embodiments, the alcohol is present from about 20% to about 70% by volume. In alternative embodiments, the alcohol is present at about 50% by volume.
In some embodiments, the chelating agent in the antimicrobial composition comprises ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA). In some embodiments, the EDTA is present at a concentration of from about 5 mg/mL to about 50 mg/mL. In other embodiments, the EDTA is present at a concentration of about 10 mg/mL.
In some embodiments, the peroxide or peroxide-generating agent in the antimicrobial composition comprises hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). In some embodiments, the H2O2 is present at a concentration of from about 0.05% to about 40% by volume. In other embodiments, the H2O2 is present at a concentration of from about 0.5% to about 7.5% by volume. In alternative embodiments, the H2O2 is present at a concentration of about 1.5% by volume.
The antimicrobial compositions may be in a liquid form or a gel form, and may be combined with one or more carriers or diluents, depending on the needs of a specific application. For example, if the antimicrobial composition is used as a cleaning agent the antimicrobial composition may be in a liquid form. In that case, the concentration of the various constituents may depend on, for example, a desired level of sanitation and/or disinfection, whether the composition is being applied directly to living tissue or to a medical device, and/or to avoid irritation of tissue to which the composition will be applied directly or indirectly (e.g., via a medical device to which the composition is or was applied).
In addition to providing disinfection at the time of the application, the antimicrobial compositions may also provide a lasting barrier against contamination. For example, even after volatile constituents of the composition (e.g., water, alcohol, hydrogen peroxide, etc.) have evaporated, the chelating agent may remain on the treated surfaces (e.g., multiple use vial or port cleaning/protecting device, stethoscope, fingers, surrounding tissue, etc.) as a barrier that will provide antibacterial, antifungal or sporicidal (e.g., preventing germination of the spores), anti-parasitic, spermicidal or spermiostatic (e.g., decrease the motility of spermatozoon) and antiviral qualities. By robbing the environment of components (e.g., iron, magnesium, and manganese) that are needed for the bacteria, spores, parasites, fungus and viruses to reproduce, the chelating agent provides a lasting defense to contamination even after other constituents of the antimicrobial composition have evaporated. Furthermore, the hydrogen peroxide in the antimicrobial compositions may induce a charge on a surface of materials (e.g., silicone materials) to which the antimicrobial compositions are applied, which make the materials more resistant to bacteria or other microorganisms.
In some embodiments, the antimicrobial composition described above may also provide a visual indication of contamination when applied to a surface or material, such indication may allow users to identify and clean surfaces to prevent infection.
If a surface or material is contaminated with bacteria, spores, parasites, viruses, bodily fluids, or other contaminants, the antimicrobial composition will begin to bubble or foam, providing a visual indicator of the contamination. The bubbling or foaming action is caused by reaction of the hydrogen peroxide with the bacteria, spores, parasites, and viruses. Specifically, contaminant enzymes that cause the hydrogen peroxide in the antimicrobial compositions to foam include, for example, catalases, superoxide dismutases (SOD), glutathione peroxidases, peroxiredoxin, and other peroxidases. Ooropharyngeal, respiratory, cervicovaginal secretions and serum would also contain hydrogen peroxide reactants or enzymes that would cause the antimicrobial compositions to foam. EDTA may attenuate these reactions somewhat. However, testing shows that the attenuation is mild and does not impair the ability of the antimicrobial compositions to visually indicate the presence of contamination. For example, staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) with catalase and Pseudomonas aeruginosa with SOD both produce vigorous bubbling on contact with antimicrobial compositions according to this application. The hydrogen peroxide will also produce bubbles or foam in response to a Fenton reaction with iron in the hemoglobin in red blood cells, or peroxidases in white blood cells and in the bodily fluids. The size and rate of bubble formation may be indicative of the level of contamination, giving the medical personnel a visual indication that the equipment is contaminated and a relative degree to which the equipment is contaminated (e.g., more or larger bubbles/foam indicates more contamination). Based on this indication medical personnel may determine that the equipment needs further cleaning and/or replacement to avoid infection.
The term “about” or “approximate” as used in context of describing the example antimicrobial composition is to be construed to include a reasonable margin of error that would be acceptable and/or known in the art.
Example Combined Cap Applicators
In some embodiments, the applicator material 104 and 106 housed within each cap is a permeable foam or sponge material, that may be coated or impregnated with a cleansing, antimicrobial, or antiseptic composition such as those described in the preceding section. Example materials for the composition of the applicator material 104 and 106 may include, but are not limited to starch polymer, cellulosic gel, polyurethane, silicone, silicone rubber, polyethylene, polypropylene, thermoplastic elastomer or mixtures thereof.
In some embodiments, the applicator material 104 and 106 may include, but are not limited to, different surface treatments (e.g., siping, slitting, etc.), surface finishes (e.g., macro-, micro-, or nano-structures, etc.), and/or contours (e.g., rounded, ribbed, protrusions, fingers, etc.) to provide cleaning and/or scrubbing effectiveness. In some embodiments, the applicator material in the first cap may be configured similar to the applicator material in the second cap (e.g., with the same surface treatments, finishes and/or contours). However, in other embodiments, the applicator material in the first cap may be configured with a different surface treatments, finishes and/or contours than the applicator material in the second cap.
Further, while caps 100 and 102 and applicator material 104 and 106 are illustrated as being a generally cylindrical body, in other embodiments, the applicator material may take on other shapes and/or sizes. In some embodiments, the applicator material may have a shape that is substantially similar to the shape of the receptacle of the corresponding cap. For example, where the receptacle is cylindrical, the applicator material may also be cylindrical.
In some embodiments, the first cap 100 and the second cap 102 may be coupled together (e.g., during manufacture, packaging, assembly, etc.) by threads, a snap fit flange, a snap fit channel, a molded feature (e.g., the first cap may be custom cast in one of various shapes to uniquely correspond to the shape of the second cap thereby allowing a resin or adhesive, for example, to form a releasable seal when the first and second cap are attached), or the like. In some embodiments, the connection of the first cap 100 to the second cap 102 forms a seal to enclose the cleansing, antimicrobial, or antiseptic composition therein, thus preventing leakage or evaporation.
The first cap 100 may be removed or detached from the second cap 102 by, for example, twisting, pulling, snapping, or bending the first cap away from the second cap.
In other embodiments, each cap may be additionally sealed by a removable protective film or cover over the interior cavity that maintains the applicator material and cleansing, antimicrobial, or antiseptic composition in the respective caps. In some embodiments, each applicator material of each protective cap may contain a different cleansing, antimicrobial or antiseptic composition and/or different concentration of such composition.
In some embodiments, the first cap 100 may comprise a cap having an applicator material that protrudes from the receptacle of the cap, while the second cap 102 comprises a cap having applicator material that fits completely within and/or is recessed in a receptacle in the cap when in use. In that case, the first cap 100 with the protruding applicator material may be used to clean a surface (e.g., an intravascular line, valve, or port, an injection site, or the like) and the second cap 102 with the recessed applicator material may be used to cover and protect a port, vial, or other component (e.g., an intravascular line port, a vial, or the like).
In some embodiments, where the first or second cap may be configured to cover and/or protect a surface as described above, each of the first and second caps may have one of various example mechanisms for attaching each cap to the surface as described below in FIGS. 4C and 5A-5C.
Example Process
At operation 202, a device comprising a first cap detachably coupled to a second cap may be obtained. For example, such device may be any of the embodiments of the combined cap applicator as described above.
At operation 204, the first cap of the device may be detached from the second cap. In the context of
At operation 206, an applicator located in the cavity of the first cap may be applied to a surface. Again, in the context of
Finally, at operation 208, the second cap may be removably secured to the surface. By securing the second cap to the surface, the surface may be protected from becoming re-contaminated by other environmental contaminants.
Example Protective Cap Device
Various example protective cap devices are described herein. Example protective cap devices are described generally with reference to
In the illustrated example of
In some embodiments, the example protective cap device may include a label area for labeling by the user and/or the placement of an identification tag or tracking barcode.
As shown in
In other embodiments, the example protective cap device may be constructed with a flange on the inner surface at the opening of the cavity. The inner surface of the example protective cap device may otherwise have a continuous smooth surface. In this embodiment, the size of the flange may vary depending, in part, on the OD of the neck of the vial. When the example protective cap device in this embodiment is placed over the vial the flange allows the example protective cap to snap into place over the neck of the vial.
In still other embodiments, the example protective cap device may have internal slits in the cap that run from the opening of the cavity toward the closed end of the example protective cap device. The slits may expand only part way through the wall of the cap such that the cap still provides a seal to prevent contamination of the vial. The internal slits in the example protective cap device would allow for the cap to expand enveloping a portion of the vial as the example protective cap device is slid over the vial.
In still other embodiments, the example protective cap device may have a wire mechanism located within or around the cavity to allow for attachment to a vial. The wire mechanism may take the form of a spring. As with the example threads 406 in
Example Packaging of Protective Cap Device
Any of the example protective cap devices described above may be sterilely packaged individually or in kits of multiple devices in a variety of packages. Furthermore, the protective cap devices themselves may additionally or alternatively be housed in a packaging that contains UV protective materials to inhibit breakdown of the antimicrobial composition.
The approach described in
In another embodiment, as shown in
Other Cap Devices
In some examples, cap devices such as those described herein as well as in U.S. Pat. No. 7,763,006 to Tennican, U.S. Pat. No. 7,799,010 to Tennican, and U.S. Pat. No. 7,792,322 to Tennican, and/or U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/564,206, filed Nov. 28, 2011 to Tennican et al., all of which are incorporated herein by reference, may be used with syringe devices, such as mixing administration syringes described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,635,344 to Tennican et al., U.S. Pat. No. 7,731,678 to Tennican et al., U.S. Pat. No. 7,731,679 to Tennican et al., U.S. Pat. No. 7,749,189 to Tennican et al., U.S. Pat. No. 7,753,891 to Tennican et al., U.S. Pat. No. 7,776,011 to Tennican et al., U.S. Pat. No. 7,985,211 to Tennican et al., U.S. Pat. No. 8,002,737 to Tennican, U.S. Pat. App. Pub. No. 2007/0167910 filed Nov. 9, 2006 to Tennican et al., U.S. Pat. App. Pub. No. 2007/0249996 filed May 21, 2007 to Tennican et al., and U.S. Pat. App. Pub. No. 2011/0272310 filed Jul. 15, 2011 to Tennican, which are also incorporated herein by reference.
For example, the cap devices may be packaged with a syringe (e.g., a mixing administration syringe) in accordance with the methods described in the preceding sections, or in other methods. The cap devices may be packaged in a sterile packaging along with a syringe in the same compartment of the sterile packaging or in a separate compartment of the sterile packaging. Alternatively, one or more cap devices may be packaged separately from the syringe.
In some examples, one or more cap devices may be coupled in, on, or to the plunger, wings, tip, or other portion of the syringe. In that case, the cap devices may be sealed directly to the syringe body, or may be sealed by a separate removable film or cover.
The cap device may be placed on the port access line or IV device after the mixing administrative syringe has been used on the port access line or IV device and/or an injection or blood draw site.
In some embodiments, a cap device may be used to clean, sanitize and/or disinfect on a surface (e.g., skin or tissue) prior to using the mixing administrative syringe. For example, the cap device may be used to clean an injection site prior to using the mixing administrative syringe at the injection site.
In some embodiments, a cap device may be placed on the mixing administrative syringe to disinfect the syringe prior to use. Additionally or alternatively, a cap device may be placed on a vial of medication or diluents to disinfect the vial prior to use, between uses, and/or during storage.
Although the disclosure describes embodiments having specific structural features and/or methodological acts, it is to be understood that the claims are not necessarily limited to the specific features or acts described. Rather, the specific features and acts are merely illustrative some embodiments that fall within the scope of the claims of the disclosure.
This claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/595,635 filed on Feb. 6, 2012 entitled “Antiseptic Applicators and Protective Devices,” which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3860348 | Doyle | Jan 1975 | A |
4291697 | Georgevich | Sep 1981 | A |
4440207 | Genatempo et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
4830856 | Peppers | May 1989 | A |
4893956 | Wojcik et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
5015228 | Columbus et al. | May 1991 | A |
5046608 | Laipply | Sep 1991 | A |
5438984 | Schoendorfer | Aug 1995 | A |
5554135 | Menyhay | Sep 1996 | A |
5556375 | Ewall | Sep 1996 | A |
5637080 | Geng | Jun 1997 | A |
5713842 | Kay | Feb 1998 | A |
5730530 | Stoddard et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5732716 | Utecht | Mar 1998 | A |
5779053 | Partika et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5846559 | Hopp | Dec 1998 | A |
5973221 | Collyer et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6063029 | Saita et al. | May 2000 | A |
6168800 | Dobos et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6455066 | Fischer et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
7282186 | Lake, Jr. et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7478962 | De Laforcade | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7482021 | Tison et al. | Jan 2009 | B1 |
7780794 | Rogers et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7799010 | Tennican | Sep 2010 | B2 |
8065773 | Vaillancourt et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8273303 | Ferlic et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8336152 | Vaillancourt et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8496625 | Brugger et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8647326 | Solomon et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8777504 | Shaw et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8778387 | Tennican et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
20030007939 | Murad | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20040037789 | Moneuze et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040110841 | Kite et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20050034731 | Rousseau et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050084521 | Hamada et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050129897 | Zhou et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050265773 | De Laforcade | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060129117 | Malowaniec | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060142684 | Shanbrom | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060151347 | Grossman | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070179373 | Pronovost | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070255193 | Patel et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080057136 | Polyakov et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080119801 | Moore | May 2008 | A1 |
20080181950 | Bates et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20090010998 | Marchitto et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090012496 | Tennican | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090028750 | Ryan | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090036541 | Mardis | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090324508 | Bobbert | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100030170 | Keller et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100050351 | Colantonio et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100078336 | Reyhan et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100163435 | Fischer et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100260865 | Kritzler | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110052664 | Tennican et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110184382 | Cady | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110265834 | Tennican | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120288571 | Tennican et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130138085 | Tennican | May 2013 | A1 |
20130287860 | Tennican et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140243725 | Tennican et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2546003 | Apr 2003 | CN |
2705167 | Jun 2005 | CN |
1711845 | Dec 2005 | CN |
1813097 | Aug 2006 | CN |
0262792 | Apr 1988 | EP |
1687039 | Jan 2009 | EP |
350384 | Jun 1931 | GB |
07500751 | Jan 1995 | JP |
10110268 | Apr 1998 | JP |
2001525688 | Dec 2001 | JP |
2004049540 | Feb 2004 | JP |
2005511147 | Apr 2005 | JP |
2005350571 | Dec 2005 | JP |
2006503647 | Feb 2006 | JP |
2006526664 | Nov 2006 | JP |
2007505093 | Mar 2007 | JP |
2007536261 | Dec 2007 | JP |
2008503485 | Feb 2008 | JP |
2009519312 | May 2009 | JP |
2013503713 | Feb 2013 | JP |
WO8503275 | Aug 1985 | WO |
WO9204923 | Apr 1992 | WO |
WO9308777 | May 1993 | WO |
WO0156540 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO2004091675 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO2004108091 | Dec 2004 | WO |
WO2005003436 | Jan 2005 | WO |
WO2005025486 | Mar 2005 | WO |
WO2005062896 | Jul 2005 | WO |
WO2005089341 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO2006009853 | Jan 2006 | WO |
WO2006089139 | Aug 2006 | WO |
WO2007068938 | Jun 2007 | WO |
WO2007137056 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO2008003779 | Jan 2008 | WO |
WO2008009925 | Jan 2008 | WO |
WO2009076718 | Jun 2009 | WO |
WO2011019132 | Jul 2011 | WO |
WO2011163124 | Dec 2011 | WO |
WO2013082187 | Jun 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
PCT Search Report mailed May 15, 2013 for PCT application No. PCT/US13/24635, 10 pages. |
The PCT Search Report mailed May 13, 2013 for PCT application No. PCT/US13/24644, 10 pages. |
Tjhe PCT Search Report mailed May 15, 2013 for PCT application No. PCT/US13/24651, 12 pages. |
The PCT Search report mailed May 31, 2013 for PCT application No. PCT/US13/24649, 14 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/757,318, mailed on Aug. 26, 2014, Tennican, “Antiseptic Applicators and Packaging Techniques”, 9 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/757,423, mailed on Sep. 4, 2014, Tennican, “Adhesive Patch with Antimicrobial Composition”, 13 pages. |
The Australian Office Action mailed Nov. 4, 2013 for Australian patent application No. 2010289415, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 12/874,188, 3 pages. |
The Australian Office Action mailed Mar. 13, 2014 for Australian patent application No. 2011207398, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 13/554,962, 3 pages. |
Translated Chinese Office Action mailed Oct. 17, 2013 for Chinese patent application No. 201180006632.3, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 13/554,962, 13 page. |
Translated Chinese Office Action mailed Oct. 23, 2014 for Chinese patent application No. 201080047665.8, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Pat. No. 8,778,387, 13 pages. |
Translated Chinese Office Action mailed Apr. 10, 2014 for Chinese patent application No. 201180006632.3, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 13/554,962, 19 pages. |
Translated Chinese Office Action mailed Apr. 22, 2014 for Chinese patent application No. 201080047665.8, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 12/874,188, 17 pages. |
Translated Chinese Office Action mailed Aug. 12, 2013 for Chinese patent application No. 201080047665.8, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 12/874,188, 13 pages. |
Translated Chinese Office Action mailed Sep. 25, 2014 for Chinese patent application No. 201180006632.3, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 13/554,962, 19 pages. |
The European Office Action mailed Sep. 12, 2014 for European patent application No. 11701925.7, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Pat. No. 8,846,008, 5 pages. |
The European Search Report mailed Apr. 23, 2014 for European patent application No. , 11 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/554,962, mailed on Dec. 5, 2013, Patrick O. Tennican, “Antimicrobial Agents and Methods of Use”, 14 pages. |
Hospenthal et al., “Guidelines for the Prevention of Infections After Combat-Related Injuries”, Journal of TRAUMA Injury, Infection, and Critical Care, vol. 64, No. 3, Mar. 2008, pp. S211-S220. |
Translated Japanese Office Action mailed Aug. 19, 2014 for Japanese patent application No. 2012-528071, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Pat. No. 8,778,387, 10 pages. |
Japanese Patent No. JP6501857, which corresponds to International Patent Publication No. WO92/04923. |
McGee et al., “Preventing Complications of Central Venous Catheterization”, The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 348, No. 12, Mar. 20, 2003, pp. 1123-1133. |
The Mexican Office Action mailed Jul. 2, 2014 for Mexican patent application No. MX/a/2012/008482, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Appl. No. 13/554,962, 2 pages. |
The Mexican Office Action mailed May 26, 2014 for Mexican patent application No. MX/a/2012/002746, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Pat. No. 8,778,387, 4 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/924,410, mailed on Nov. 22, 2013, Patrick O. Tennican, “Antimicrobial Agents and Methods of Use”, 15 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/874,188, mailed Dec. 19, 2012, Patrick O. Tennican et al., “Antimicrobial Medical Dressings and Protecting Wounds and Catheter Sites”, 6 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for US Patent Application mailed on Feb. 15, 2013, Patrick O. Tennican et al., “Antimicrobial Agents and Methods of Use”, 12 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/874,188, mailed Feb. 7, 2014, Patrick O. Tennican et al., “Antimicrobial Medical Dressings and Protecting Wounds and Catheter Sites”, 6 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/924,410, mailed on Mar. 28, 2014, Patrick O. Tennican, “Antimicrobial Agents and Methods of Use”, 18 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/874,188, mailed Jun. 29, 2012, Patrick O. Tennican et al., “Antimicrobial Medical Dressings and Protecting Wounds and Catheter Sites”, 6 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/874,188, mailed on Sep. 10, 2013, Tennican et al., “Antimicrobial Medical Dressings and Protecting Wounds and Catheter Sites”, 6 pages. |
Office action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/271,365, mailed on Sep. 11, 2014, Tennican et al., “Antimicrobial Medical Dressings and Protecting Wounds and Catheter Sites”, 7 pages. |
The PCT Search Report mailed May 20, 2011 for PCT Appliction No. PCT/US10/47756. |
The PCT Search Report mailed Aug. 1, 2011 for PCT application No. PCT/US11/22150. |
Singhal et al., “Wound Infection”, eMedicine from WebMD <<http://www.emedicine,medscape.com>>, Updated Sep. 15, 2009, 32 pages. |
“VERSENE Acid—Solubility”, The Dow Chemical Company, Sep. 15, 2010, pp. 1-3. |
“VERSENE NA Disodium EDTA Chelating Agent”, The Dow Chemical Company, Oct. 2009, pp. 1-2. |
The Translated Chinese Office Action mailed Apr. 8, 2015 for Chinese patent application No. 201180006632.3, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Pat. No. 8,846,008, 19 pAGES. |
The Translated Chinese Office Action mailed Apr. 9, 2015 for Chinese patent application No. 201080047665.8, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Pat. No. 8,778,387, 8 pages. |
The Translated Japanese Office Action mailed Dec. 24, 2014 for Japanese patent application No. 2012-550177, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Pat. No. 8,846,008, 4 pages. |
The Translated Japanese Office Action mailed Apr. 14, 2015 for Japanese patent application No. 2012-528071, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Pat. No. 8,778,387, 9 pages. |
The Mexican Office Action mailed Jan. 13, 2015 for Mexican patent application No. MX/a/2012/002746, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Pat. No. 8,778,387, 2 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/271,365, mailed on Jan. 23, 2015, Patrick O. Tennican, “Antimicrobial Medical Dressings and Protecting Wounds and Catheter Sites”, 8 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/934,135, mailed on Mar. 12, 2015, Patrick O. Tennican, “Antimicrobial Agents and Methods of Use”, 14 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/757,423, mailed on Apr. 10, 2015, Patrick O. Tennican, “Adhesive Patch with Antimicrobial Composition”, 13 pages. |
Translated Russian Office Action mailed Jan. 23, 2015 for Russian patent applcation No. 2012136147, a counterpart foreign application of US patent application No. , pages. |
The Extended European Search Report mailed Mo Sep. 10, 2015 for European Patent Application No. 13747071.2, 8 pages. |
The Extended European Search Report mailed Sep. 11, 2015 for European Patent Application 13746209.9, 6 pages. |
The Extended European Search Report mailed Sep. 17, 2015 for European patent application No. 13746984.7, 7 pages. |
The Extended European Search Report mailed Sep. 18, 2015 for European Patent Application No. 13746515.9, 7 pages. |
The Translated Japanese Office Action mailed Aug. 11, 2015 for Japanese patent application No. 2012-550177, a counterpart foreign application of U.S. Pat. No. 8,846,008, 4 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130199947 A1 | Aug 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61595635 | Feb 2012 | US |