The invention relates to a medical device and more specifically relates to a combined laser beam splitter retrieval device.
In flexible ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy procedures, laser fibers are brought in close proximity to calculi under direct visualization for the purpose of reducing their size so they can be less traumatically removed from patients. Depending on the physical properties of the calculi and its location in the patient's anatomy, different laser parameter settings are optimal for ablating it. Currently marketed lasers do not deliver less than 0.2 Joules of energy per pulse, or pulse peak powers of less than 5 kW. The procedural consequences of even these lowest settings are that small fragments experience retropulsion, and that tissue can be significantly damaged by it if the laser fiber is too close to it. Retropulsion is the movement of calculi away from the source of energy being used to break them.
The consequences to the patient is that they are exposed to procedures that take the physician longer to manipulate the ureteroscope and laser fiber to maintain close proximity to the calculi fragments, and they are exposed to more tissue injury since each accidental tissue exposure to the laser energy is damaging.
Laser fibers are generally adequately flexible so as not to prevent endoscopes from deflecting enough to access all areas of a kidney. They also generally do not take up so much of the endoscopic working channel so as to restrict irrigation required to keep the field of view clear. For these reasons, laser fibers used in flexible lithotripsy have cores that are generally not larger than 272 μm, with outer diameters in the about 400-500 μm range. At the surface of the fiber, the laser may be about 272 μm in diameter.
The size of a typical calculi treated by flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy ranges from about 5 to 20 mm in diameter, assuming a sphere. Therefore, physicians deploy a variety of techniques to move the 0.272 mm laser fiber over the surface of the calculi. This can take physicians from 15 minutes to over an hour for the larger calculi. Calculi must be reduced to approximately 3 mm fragments if they will be removed by a retrieval device like a stone retrieval basket, or less than approximately 1.5 mm if they will be left in the patient to be flushed out by the normal anatomical urinary system flushing process. As discussed above, the amount of time that it takes to reduce a calculi to acceptable sizes varies based on the physician's skill at maintaining the laser fiber and endoscope in close proximity to the calculi and its larger fragments, the mechanical properties of the particular stone, and the magnitude of the laser parameters being deployed.
The more energy or peak power being used against a calculi, the more readily it will break into fragments, but the more likely that those fragments will be larger, and experience considerable retropulsion requiring the physician to “chase” them and therefore take longer.
Accordingly, there is a need to provide improved and reliable medical device configurations.
In accordance with one aspect of the invention, a medical device is disclosed. The medical device includes a sheath, a laser fiber, a basket section, and a laser beam splitter. The laser fiber is configured to extend from an end of the sheath. The basket section includes flexible members. At least a portion of the flexible members are between the sheath and the laser fiber. The laser beam splitter is coupled to the laser fiber.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention, a method is disclosed. A sheath is provided. A laser fiber is extended from an end of the sheath. A basket section is slidably connected between the sheath and the laser fiber. The basket section includes flexible members. At least a portion of the flexible members are between the sheath and the laser fiber. A laser beam splitter is coupled to the laser fiber.
The foregoing aspects and other features of the invention are explained in the following description, taken in connection with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
Referring to
The retrieval device 10 comprises a basket section 12, a sheath 14, and a laser fiber 16. The basket section 12 comprises a plurality of flexible members 18 configured to extend from a distal end of the retrieval device 10. The sheath 14 and flexible members 18 are longitudinally movable (see arrow 20) relative to each other to move the basket section between a forward position (to open the basket section 12) and a rearward position (to close the basket section 12) relative to the sheath 14. According to various exemplary embodiments, a control wire for moving the basket section 12 may be connected to ends of the flexible members 18, however in alternate embodiments any suitable configuration for moving the basket section may be provided.
The laser fiber 16 comprises a plurality of individual core fibers 24 and is configured to extend from the distal end of the retrieval device 10. The laser fiber 16 is longitudinally movable (see arrow 26) relative to the sheath 14 (and the flexible members 18) such that the laser fiber 16 can slide forward and backward.
Referring now also to
Referring now also to
In this embodiment, the laser fiber 116 comprises a single core fiber 124 (which may have a diameter of about 0.3 mm, for example) within a laser fiber sheath 130 and is configured to extend from the distal end of the retrieval device 10 (however in alternate embodiments the laser fiber 116 can comprise a bundle of core fibers). The laser fiber 116 is disposed within a channel 129 between the flexible members 118 of the basket section 112 wherein the laser fiber is substantially concentric to the sheath 114 and such that the flexible members 118 are between the laser fiber 116 and the sheath 114. The laser fiber 116 is longitudinally movable relative to the sheath 114 (and the flexible members 118) such that the laser fiber 116 can slide forward and backward. Also, according to some embodiments the laser beam diffraction splitter 136 may have a longitudinal dimension of about 1.2 mm and a perpendicular dimension of about 1.5 mm. However, in alternate embodiments any suitable dimensions may be provided. Additionally, in this embodiment the laser beam diffraction splitter 136 is coupled to the laser fiber 116.
It should be noted that while the embodiment above has been described in connection the beam splitter/spreader 136 having a rectangular profile, one skilled in the art will appreciate that the various embodiments are not necessarily so limited and that in alternate embodiments other suitable profile shapes may be provided. For example,
As mentioned above, the laser beam diffraction splitter 136 is coupled to the laser fiber 116. It should be noted that the beam splitter/spreader 136 may be attached to the laser fiber core and or cladding using various methods including adhesive with optical transparency for the wavelength under consideration or glass fusion welding or other glass to glass bonding technologies that minimizes the optical minimize transmission losses through the joint so as to minimize the thermal gradient across the joint. In the embodiment shown in
It should be noted that while the embodiment above has been described in connection with a fusion weld to couple the laser fiber to the laser beam diffraction splitter, one skilled in the art will appreciate that the various embodiments are not necessarily so limited and that in alternate embodiments other suitable methods of coupling the laser fiber to the laser beam diffraction splitter may be provided. For example,
Technical effects of any one or more of the exemplary embodiments provide significant advantages over conventional configurations by providing the stone retrieval device with a channel for the laser fiber and the laser beam diffraction splitter 136. This configuration supports a captured calculus 90 (as shown in
The laser beam diffraction splitter (or diffraction beam splitting lens) 136 is provided at the end of the laser fiber 116 (or on the end of a tube protruding from the retrieval device) to address the likely consequence that a single hole of a diameter only slightly larger than the fiber is made in the center of a captured calculus 90. According to various exemplary embodiments, the diffraction beam splitter 136 creates an n×n array of discrete laser beams from one laser beam. The angle of each discrete beam is adjustable by the diffraction properties of the lens and its thickness. In this example, a 10×10 array would split one laser beam into 100 individual beams each delivering the same spatial power density to the stone 90. The duration of each pulse would stay the same, but the peak power of each of the 100 beams would be less than the primary beam, proportional to its surface area. Therefore, if the primary beam delivered, for example, 4 Joules per pulse, then each of the 100 beams could deliver 0.04 Joules per pulse, each having the same pulse duration, but a lower peak power level assuming the target calculi was far enough away from the lens 136 to produce 100 lasers of spot size equal to the primary laser.
With evidence that energies above approximately 0.025 Joules are sufficient to ablate human calculi, additional technical effects of any one or more of the exemplary embodiments are provided. The above beam splitting approach significantly increases the surface area being acted upon and can reduce the need to move a small laser fiber over the surface of a calculus. Additionally, the 10×10 array is just one example, the array size can be tuned to accommodate energy losses due to absorption in the media between the lens surface and a calculi, but still deliver enough intensity to cause ablation.
A further technical effect of any one or more of the exemplary embodiments provides configurations which can better accommodate burn back of the fiber and provide for an improved anti-migration lithotripter.
It should be noted that various exemplary embodiments of the basket section may comprise an open-mouth configuration similar to the NGage® fabricated by Cook Medical, or the Dakota™ fabricated by Boston Scientific, or other retrieval device designs that do not extend all the way around a stone like a snare. For example, as shown in
Below are provided further descriptions of various non-limiting, exemplary embodiments. The below-described exemplary embodiments may be practiced in conjunction with one or more other aspects or exemplary embodiments. That is, the exemplary embodiments of the invention, such as those described immediately below, may be implemented, practiced or utilized in any combination (e.g., any combination that is suitable, practicable and/or feasible) and are not limited only to those combinations described herein and/or included in the appended claims.
In one exemplary embodiment, a medical device is disclosed. The medical device comprises a sheath; a laser fiber configured to extend from an end of the sheath; a basket section comprising flexible members, wherein at least a portion of the flexible members are between the sheath and the laser fiber; and a laser beam splitter coupled to the laser fiber.
A medical device as above wherein the laser fiber is longitudinally movable relative to the sheath.
A medical device as above wherein the laser fiber is substantially concentric with the sheath.
A medical device as above wherein the flexible members are movable relative to the sheath.
A medical device as above wherein the basket section is in an open configuration when the flexible members are moved to a forward position.
A medical device as above wherein the basket section is in a collapsed configuration when the flexible members are moved to a rearward position.
A medical device as above further comprising a channel between the laser fiber and the flexible members, and wherein the laser fiber is movable within the channel.
A medical device as above wherein the laser beam splitter is coupled to the laser fiber by a fusion weld.
A medical device as above wherein the laser beam splitter is coupled to the laser fiber by an adhesive.
A medical device as above wherein the laser fiber and the laser beam splitter are movable relative to the flexible members of the basket device.
In another exemplary embodiment, a method is disclosed. The method comprises providing a sheath; extending a laser fiber from an end of the sheath; slidably connecting a basket section between the sheath and the laser fiber, wherein the basket section comprises flexible members, and wherein at least a portion of the flexible members are between the sheath and the laser fiber; and coupling a laser beam splitter to the laser fiber.
A method as above wherein the laser fiber is longitudinally movable relative to the sheath.
A method as above wherein the laser fiber is substantially concentric with the sheath.
A method as above wherein the flexible members are movable relative to the sheath.
A method as above wherein the basket section is in an open configuration when the flexible members are moved to a forward position.
A method as above wherein the basket section is in a collapsed configuration when the flexible members are moved to a rearward position.
A method as above further comprising a channel between the laser fiber and the flexible members, and wherein the laser fiber is movable within the channel.
A method as above wherein the laser beam splitter is coupled to the laser fiber by a fusion weld.
A method as above wherein the laser beam splitter is coupled to the laser fiber by an adhesive.
A method as above wherein the laser fiber and the laser beam splitter are movable relative to the flexible members of the basket device.
It should be understood that components of the invention can be operationally coupled or connected and that any number or combination of intervening elements can exist (including no intervening elements). The connections can be direct or indirect and additionally there can merely be a functional relationship between components.
It should be understood that the foregoing description is only illustrative of the invention. Various alternatives and modifications can be devised by those skilled in the art without departing from the invention. Accordingly, the invention is intended to embrace all such alternatives, modifications and variances which fall within the scope of the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5396571 | Saadatmanesh | Mar 1995 | A |
5751869 | Li | May 1998 | A |
6039747 | Shturman | Mar 2000 | A |
7297154 | Tu | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7344528 | Tu et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7727227 | Teague et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7952719 | Brennan, III | May 2011 | B2 |
8388630 | Teague | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8452383 | Norris | May 2013 | B2 |
20050075704 | Tu et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050154378 | Teague et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20060093265 | Jia | May 2006 | A1 |
20100113906 | Marple | May 2010 | A1 |
20150272679 | Wang | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20160302868 | Nagale | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20170071664 | Lim | Mar 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102791213 | Nov 2012 | CN |
109692039 | Apr 2019 | CN |
3476350 | May 2019 | EP |
3476350 | Nov 2020 | EP |
S5623943 | Mar 1981 | JP |
H11276499 | Oct 1999 | JP |
2013513430 | Apr 2013 | JP |
2019076702 | May 2019 | JP |
WO-2009108950 | Sep 2009 | WO |
WO-2011071776 | Jun 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“Hold like a basket and release like a grasper—NGage Nitinol Stone Extractor” Cook Medical, https://www.cookmedical.com/data/resources/URO-BM-UNG-EN-201309-M3.pdf; 2013, 2 pgs. |
“Dakota Nitinol Stone Retrieval Device with OpenSure Handle—Every Detail Matters”, Boston Scientific, http://www.bostonscientific.com/content/dam/bostonscientific/uro-wh/portfolio-group/retrieval/dakota/pdfs/Dakota-brochure.pdf; Oct. 2016, 4 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 18195242.5, Extended European Search Report dated Mar. 20, 2019”, 7 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 18195242.5, Response filed Oct. 29, 2019 to Extended European Search Report dated Mar. 20, 2019”, 16 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 20182955.3, Extended European Search Report dated Oct. 6, 2020”, 7 pgs. |
“Japanese Application Serial No. 2018-192471, Notification of Reasons for Refusal dated Oct. 26, 2020”, w/ English Translation, 8 pgs. |
“Japanese Application Serial No. 2018-192471, Response filled Jan. 25, 2021 to Notification of Reasons for Refusal dated Oct. 26, 2020”, w/English claims, 7 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 20182955.3, Response filed May 4, 2021 to Extended European Search Report dated Oct. 6, 2020”, 24 pgs. |
“Japanese Application Serial No. 2018-192471, Examiners Decision of Final Refusal dated Jun. 14, 2021”, w/ english translation, 8 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201811137776.2, Office Action dated Dec. 1, 2021”, w/English Translation, 18 pgs. |
“Japanese Application Serial No. 2018-192471, Response filed Oct. 14, 2021 to Examiners Decision of Final Refusal dated Jun. 14, 2021”, w English Claims, 10 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190117309 A1 | Apr 2019 | US |