1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a combined piloting method of remote operated underwater vehicles, a device for the implementation of said method and a system using the same.
2. Description of the Related Art
The use of remote operated underwater vehicles, also called ROV (remote operated vehicle) in effecting construction and maintenance operations of underwater structures, is widely used in the offshore and scientific environment and for the installation of building structures.
The necessity of operating with increasingly more voluminous structures and/or requiring particular operations, has led to the production of more powerful and high-performance ROVs, also having special equipment for the particular intervention.
Operative procedures have also been elaborated, specifically for particular operations, such as for example the lowering and positioning of objects in an underwater environment, visual inspection during underwater installation operations and the reduction of disturbances during the moving of long or large-sized structures.
There are currently various types of different ROVs, each of which can be used for effecting a certain operation.
In particular, low-power ROVs which are generally used only for the visual inspection of underwater operations, can be distinguished from different types of high-power ROVs which differ in their use, for example the moving of objects and/or actuating operations through robotic systems.
In order to be able to effect the numerous necessary operations, for example in offshore oil production, an equivalent number of different ROVs each belonging to a particular type of use is therefore necessary.
The boats used for offshore operations, however, are generally not equipped with a high number of different types of remote operated vehicles, in particular due to their encumbrances and significant costs.
These crafts are generally equipped with low-power ROVs, also called inspection ROVs, which, however, cannot be used for carrying out operations to be effected by high-power ROVs.
This is currently not possible even when the lower power offered by inspection ROVs is satisfied through the use of a plurality of said vehicles.
The use of various inspection ROVs in fact does not achieve the results offered by a high-power ROV as, for this purpose, it is necessary to have a coordination of the operations of the single inspection ROVs which cannot be achieved through the currently known remote piloting methods which only allow to pilot the single ROVs separately.
In the absence of this fine coordination, the single inspection ROVs used for example in moving objects in an underwater environment could develop contrasting forces on said object making it ungovernable and even damaging it.
An objective of the present invention is to overcome the above drawbacks and in particular to create a combined piloting method of remote operated underwater vehicles which allows operations requiring a high power to be effected through the combination of remote operated vehicles with a lower power.
Another objective of the present invention is to provide a device for the piloting of remote operated underwater vehicles which allows the action of a plurality of remote operated vehicles to be combined.
A further objective is to provide a piloting system of remote operated underwater vehicles which implements said method.
These and other objectives according to the present invention are achieved by providing a combined piloting method of remote operated underwater vehicles, a device for the implementation of said method and a system using the same as specified in the independent claims.
Further aspects of the invention are object of the dependent claims.
The characteristics and advantages of a combined piloting method of remote operated underwater vehicles according to the present invention will appear more evident from the following illustrative and non-limiting description, referring to the enclosed schematic drawings, in which:
a-2d illustrate enlarged details of
With reference to the figures, these first show a system for the combined piloting of remote operated underwater vehicles according to the present invention, indicated as a whole with 10. Said system 10 comprises a processing unit 11 connected at the output to digital communication inputs of the control systems of at least two remote operated vehicles or ROVs 14 for transmitting commands to the same.
For this purpose, the processing unit 11 comprises software means 16 which determine the commands to be transmitted to the ROVs 14 through the implementation of a combined piloting method of said vehicles 14 described further on.
According to the present invention, the ROVs 14 are rigidly connected to a device 20 for their constraint to allow their combined piloting.
The processing unit 11 input is also connected to an interface 12 for the entry of operator commands, such as for example a console with a joystick, and to a system 13 for determining the position of said constraint device 20, and also the orientation of at least two ROVs 14.
For this purpose, a global positioning system 13a is used for example, preferably of the high precision type, such as the DGPS system (Differential Global Positioning System), which allows a metric or submetric accuracy to be reached, situated on the constraint device 20 and associated with the compass 13b installed in the ROVs 14. Otherwise, for determining the position of the constraint device 20, it is possible to envisage an acoustic positioning system situated at the sea bottom (not shown), preferably of the transceiver type.
Finally, the processing unit 11 preferably comprises a display interface 15 for the bidimensional and/or three-dimensional representation of the instantaneous position of the vehicles 14.
The constraint device 20 comprises at least two docking arms 25 arranged at a reciprocal fixed angular position, each equipped, at a first end 25a, with means for rigidly connecting a ROV 14. Said at least two docking arms 25 are also constrained, in correspondence with their second end 25b, to means 26 for the sliding and rotating hooking to a vertical profile 21.
In a preferred but non-limiting embodiment, the hooking means 26 are a sleeve 26 internally equipped with trolleys 28 which allow the whole unit, consisting of the sleeve 26 and arms 25, to slide along the vertical profile 21 limitedly to a trajectory defined by two mechanical run end elements 27.
The functioning of the piloting system of remote operated underwater vehicles according to the present invention is the following.
The constraint device 20 is connected to a vertical profile 21.
The ROVs 14 are subsequently rigidly connected to the constraint device 20 (phase 110) and the overall structure 14, 20 deployed in water (phase 120), monitoring its position and orientation through the system 13.
Alternatively, the connection of the ROVs (phase 110) can take place when the device 20 is already in water. The processing unit 11, by running the software means 16, determines (phase 150) the commands to be given to the same 14 on the basis of the position and instantaneous orientation of said vehicles 14 (phase 130) and information on the position and orientation to be reached inserted by an operator through the interface 12 (phase 140).
Said commands are then transferred to the controllers of the ROVs 14 (phase 160) so that these can command the desired forces to the propellers of the ROVs 14.
For the determination of the commands to be given to the ROVs 14, the Thruster Allocation Matrix (TAM) algorithm is applied on the base of the overall structure consisting of at least two ROVs rigidly connected to the device 20 for the combined piloting.
For purely illustrative and non-limiting purposes, the determination of the commands to be given to the ROVs is described hereunder with reference to an overall structure consisting of only two ROVs 14 connected to a device 20 for the combined piloting as specified above.
The mass centre Oc of the overall structure 14, 20 is first determined (phase 151) in order to construct a reference system such as that illustrated in
Upon defining (Fx1, Fy1, Fz1) the force applied by the first ROV 14 to the system, and (Fx2, Fy2, Fz2) the force applied by the second ROV to the system, according to the Thruster Allocation Matrix algorithm, these forces generate a resulting force (FX, Fy, Fz) and a resulting moment (Mx, My, Mz) with respect to the reference system of the mass centre Oc of the overall structure 14, 20, whose components are calculated by means of the following matricial calculation:
On the basis of the information inserted by the user with respect to the orientation and position that the overall structure 14, 20 must reach, the force (Fx, Fy, Fz) and the moment (Mx, My, Mz) necessary for effecting the required shift (phase 152), are determined in real time.
On the basis of these data, the components are determined of the forces Fx1, Fy1, Fz1, Fx2, Fy2, Fz2 applied by the single ROVs 14 through the matricial calculation specified above (phase 153).
Thanks to the processing unit 11 comprising the software means 16, the user can remote pilot the plurality of ROVs 14 rigidly constrained to a constraint device 20 as if he were piloting a single vehicle.
It is therefore not necessary to manually coordinate the commands given to the single ROVs 14.
The processing unit 11, by running the software means 16 which implement the combined piloting method according to the present invention, automatically translates the commands given by the operator to the overall structure 14, 20 into specific commands for the single vehicles 14.
The Applicant effected various tests for validating the invention positively verifying the capability of following desired trajectories of any type and maintaining a desired position and orientation.
In particular, a special vertical profile 21 was conceived for these tests, equipped with a ballast 22 in the low part and a floating element 23 connected to the top structure 24.
Once the constraint device 20 has been connected to said vertical profile 21, it is maintained with the main axis in vertical when released into the water.
A system for determining the position 13a of the DGPS type whose aerial 17 was installed on the top structure 24 of the vertical profile 21, was used for the validation tests.
In effecting these tests, traction disturbances of the structure were also applied.
The system 10 however proved capable of maintaining the position and orientation error of the overall structure 14, 20 below margins of centimetres in position and a few degrees with respect to orientation.
The characteristics of the device, object of the present invention, as also the related advantages, are evident from the above description.
The possibility of the combined piloting of a plurality of ROVs through the constraint device according to the present invention and the related piloting method, also allows different types of ROVs to be used for effecting different operations.
It is in fact sufficient to rigidly constrain a suitable number of ROVs through the device of the present invention to obtain an overall structure capable of supplying the power necessary for the particular operation, which can be piloted with the same simplicity as guiding a single vehicle.
It is therefore possible to use, for example, a plurality of inspection ROVs, generally available on crafts used for offshore operations, for effecting operations which require the use of vehicles capable of supplying a greater power.
The Applicant has also verified that the combined piloting system according to the present invention, if applied in oil production, in particular for the construction of underwater well heads, allows the position and orientation of large modules of well heads to be controlled making the use of guidelines so far necessary, superfluous.
Finally, the device thus conceived can evidently undergo numerous modifications and variants, all included in the invention; furthermore, all the details can be substituted by technically equivalent elements. In practice, the materials used, as also the dimensions, can vary according to technical requirements.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
MI2008A0603 | Apr 2008 | IT | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/IB2009/005205 | 4/6/2009 | WO | 00 | 12/20/2010 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2009/125279 | 10/15/2009 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3065799 | McCarty, Jr | Nov 1962 | A |
3504740 | Manning | Apr 1970 | A |
3528497 | Lehman | Sep 1970 | A |
3625171 | Bailey | Dec 1971 | A |
3702597 | Odum et al. | Nov 1972 | A |
4136633 | Homer et al. | Jan 1979 | A |
4776727 | Saffrhan | Oct 1988 | A |
5516235 | Stangroom | May 1996 | A |
5540523 | Foret et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5570324 | Geil | Oct 1996 | A |
5894450 | Schmidt et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5921713 | Gjessing et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
6106198 | Børseth | Aug 2000 | A |
6167831 | Watt et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6223675 | Watt et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6257162 | Watt et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6390012 | Watt et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6561276 | Hamilton | May 2003 | B2 |
6644409 | Strømberg et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6820008 | van Smirren et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
7140445 | Shahin et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7503391 | McCanna et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
20030049076 | Bekkevold et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20040007362 | Rodgers et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20080008037 | Welker | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080284441 | Kowalczyk et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20100089126 | Sweeney | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100144181 | Karlsen et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20120125623 | Cargol et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120132435 | Yemington | May 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
01 21476 | Mar 2001 | WO |
01 21478 | Mar 2001 | WO |
01 21479 | Mar 2001 | WO |
Entry |
---|
US 6,189,476, 02/2001, Watt et al. (withdrawn) |
International Search Report issued Apr. 21, 2010 in PCT/IB09/005205 filed Apr. 6, 2009. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110093138 A1 | Apr 2011 | US |