This is the first application filed for this invention.
The present application relates to power amplifier linearization and power dissipation and, more particularly, to a combined predistorter and feedforward corrector apparatus suitable for use in a transmitter.
A transmitter is designed to transmit a large enough power signal to overcome the loss inherent in transmitting over a distance so that the signal can still be received. The electronic equipment used to amplify small signals to a sufficiently high level for transmission is called a power amplifier.
Radio system transmitters are required to meet specifications for the signal levels at frequencies off the intended transmission frequencies. One requirement is called adjacent channel power, or a related measure called code domain power, and is related directly to the linearity of the amplifier, or the ability of the amplifier to accurately reproduce an amplified version of the input signal at the output.
At a circuit level, linearity may be achieved by biasing transistors such that they behave in a very linear fashion, but given the nature of existing transistor and more generally amplifier technology, this has a cost in terms of very low operating efficiency. Modern power amplifiers try to use the amplifying devices in such a way that they are operating at maximum efficiency, resulting in poor linearity, and subsequently using additional so-called “linearization” circuitry to correct the nonlinear behaviour.
Various linearization schemes have various tradeoffs in terms of linearity, efficiency and versatility, or robustness, such as for example analog predistortion linearization, digital predistortion linearization, and feedforward linearization.
For example, US20020131522A1 discloses a method and apparatus for the digital predistortion linearization, frequency response compensation linearization and feedforward linearization of a transmit signal wherein feeding back of measurement variables, enables to achieve a very high level of linearization effect, but this may be at the expense of power dissipation.
Similarly, WO1999045640A1 discloses a predistorter wherein the feedback arrangement is operated in real time, and takes into account time dependent changes that may result from temperature changes, aging of amplifier components or power supply fluctuations, but the linearity achieved may be ath the expense of power dissipation.
In accordance with the present disclosure, there is provided a combined predistorter and feedforward corrector apparatus suitable for use in a transmitter for improving at least one of power dissipation and linearity in the transmitter. The apparatus includes a predistorter, for receiving an input signal, and for providing a predistorter signal by performing as much linearization as necessary to predistort the input signal within the predetermined bounds of linearizer efficiency and correction required by the transmitter. A power amplifier is also provided, for receiving the predistorted signal, and for providing an amplified predistorted signal by amplifying the predistorted signal, connected to said predistorter. A feedforward corrector is also provided, for receiving the input signal, and for providing a correction signal by correcting any remaining distortion that the power amplifier produces that the predistorter did not correct. A summator is connected to said feedforward corrector, and connected to said power amplifier, for receiving the amplified predistorted signal and the correction signal, and for providing an output signal by summing the amplified predistorted signal and the correction signal.
In some embodiments, an actuator is provided, for receiving the input signal and for providing at least one of a predistorted input signal and a corrected input signal.
In some embodiments, an adjustment block is provided for receiving an adjustment input signal comprising at least one of the input signal and an input adjusted amplified predistorted signal, and for providing a respective one of an adjusted input signal and an unamplified correction signal respectively, by adjusting at least one of gain, phase, and delay of the adjustment input signal.
In some embodiments, an adaptor is provided, for receiving at least one of the input signal, the output signal, the amplified predistorted signal, and an input adjusted amplified predistorted signal, and for providing an adapted signal which is adapted to a change in the electronics environment to be used by one of an actuator and an adjustment block.
In some embodiments, an error amplifier is provided, for receiving an unamplified error signal including at least one of an unamplified correction signal, an adjusted input signal, and a corrected input signal, and for providing the correction signal by amplifying the unamplified error signal.
In some embodiments, a second summator is provided connected to the adjustment block, and connected to the power amplifier, for receiving the amplified predistorted signal and an adjusted input signal, and for providing an input adjusted amplified predistorted signal by summing the amplified predistorted signal and the adjusted input signal.
In some embodiments, an upconverter is provided for receiving an upconverter input signal including at least one of the predistorted input signal, an adjusted input signal, and a corrected input signal, and for upconverting the upconverter input signal.
In some embodiments, a downconverter is provided for receiving a downconverter input signal comprising at least one of the amplified predistorted signal, the output signal, and an input adjusted amplified predistorted signal, and for downconverting the downconverter input signal.
In some embodiments, a controller is provided connected to the feedforward corrector, and connected to the predistorter, for sensing at least one of the output signal, and the amplified predistorted signal, the input adjusted amplified predistorted signal, and for controlling at least one adaptor.
In accordance with a second aspect of the present disclosure, there is provided a method of controlling the apparatus recited above. The method includes the act of sensing signals, including at least one of the output signal, and the amplified predistorted signal. The method then proceeds with the act of determining if predistorter linearization is sufficient enough to predistort the input signal within the predetermined bounds of linearizer efficiency and correction required by the transmitter. If predistorter linearization is determined to be sufficient enough, the amount of feedforward correction in the feedforward corrector is decreased. Conversely, if predistorter linearization is determined not to be sufficient enough, then the amount of feedforward correction in the feedforward corrector is increased.
In some embodiments, the act of decreasing the amount of feedforward correction in the feedforward corrector includes the act of disabling the feedforward corrector.
In some embodiments, the act of increasing the amount of feedforward correction in the feedforward corrector includes the act of enabling the feedforward corrector.
A complete understanding of the present application may be obtained by reference to the accompanying drawings, when considered in conjunction with the subsequent, detailed description, in which:
For purposes of clarity and brevity, like elements and components will bear the same designations and numbering throughout the Figures.
Referring to the drawings, one exemplary embodiment of the apparatus is shown in
In the embodiment shown in
In the embodiment shown in
In the embodiment shown in
In the embodiment shown in
In the embodiment shown in
In the embodiment shown in
In alternative embodiments not shown in the drawings, some or all components are implemented in the analog domain, while other or all components are implemented in the digital domain. For example, the predistorter 10 in
In alternative embodiments not shown in the drawings, some components may be moved, merged, or split. For example, those skilled in the art will also understand that the downconverter 24 c1 and downconverter 24c3 may be combined into a single downconverter 24 and the downconverted signal split so as to drive the adaptor 28d1 and adaptor 28d3. Those skilled in the art will understand that the input signal to downconverter 24c1 could be moved to directly detect the output of the power amplifier 16 PA, instead of the output of the linearized system summator 22 at s2. Those skilled in the art will also understand that the adaptor 28 blocks could be removed (and corresponding signal detection and downconversion) and a so-called “blind” linearization performed which does not adapt to any changes in the electronics environment.
Another exemplary embodiment of the apparatus is shown in
Another exemplary embodiment of the apparatus is shown in
In alternative embodiments not shown in the drawings, it will be understood by those skilled in the art in view of this disclosure that the output detection c1 could be merged with output detection c2. Although the adaptor 28d1 might lose the ability to distinguish between the effect of actuator 30a1 and actuator 30a2 on the output. Such alternatives are within the scope of the present invention.
Another exemplary embodiment of the apparatus is shown in
Another exemplary embodiment of the apparatus is shown in
An exemplary embodiment of the method is shown in
At step the “Sensing signals” 100 step, signals are sensed, such as for example, at least one of the output signal, and the amplified predistorted signal. At the “Determining if predistorter linearization is sufficient?” 110 step, the controller 14 determines for example if the linearization required is as much linearization as necessary to predistort the input signal within the predetermined bounds of linearizer efficiency and correction required by the transmitter. If the controller 14 determines that the outcome of step 110 is true, then step “Feedforward correction disabled” 120 ensues and the amount of feedforward correction is decreased or disabled in the feedforward corrector 12. Conversely, if the controller 14 determines that the outcome of step 110 is false, then step “Feedforward correction enabled” 130 ensues and the amount of feedforward correction is increased or enabled in the feedforward corrector 12.
The act of sensing signals includes sensing at least one of the output signal, and the amplified predistorted signal. The sensed signals are then used in the act of determining if predistorter linearization is sufficient enough to predistort the input signal within the predetermined bounds of linearizer efficiency and correction required by the transmitter.
In an alternative embodiment not shown in the drawings, if predistorter linearization is determined to be sufficient enough, the amount of feedforward correction in the feedforward corrector is decreased. Conversely, if predistorter linearization is determined not to be sufficient enough, then the amount of feedforward correction in the feedforward corrector is increased.
In the embodiment shown in
In the embodiment shown in
Operationally, for low output power levels a limited amount of predistortion may be applied to maintain high efficiency. Where models used for digital or analog predistortion fail to account for some transistor or unlinearised power amplifier 16 characteristics the feedforward elements can supplement correction performance. Efficiency drop of feedforward linearization is mitigated by only using feedforward linearization when it is actually needed, as illustrated in the flowchart of
It will be understood by those skilled in the art that a radio may use analog or digital baseband information and that if digital baseband signal is used that the digital signal must at some point be converted to an analog signal for use in the analog RF channel of the radio. While the diagrams herein use a so-called “upconverter 20” and “downconverter 24” to describe the process of converting baseband signal to RF signal there is also an implicit conversion from digital to analog, or vice-versa as needed.
It will also be understood by those skilled in the art that the upconverter 20 and downconverter 24 may be implemented in analog electronics such as using a conventional superheterodyne system, or in digital electronics using digital signal processing based upconversion/downconversion technology.
Since other modifications and changes varied to fit particular operating requirements and environments will be apparent to those skilled in the art, the invention is not considered limited to the example chosen for purposes of disclosure, and covers all changes and modifications which do not constitute departures from the true spirit and scope of this invention.
Having thus described the invention, what is desired to be protected by Letters Patent is presented in the subsequently appended claims.