Combining light-field data with active depth data for depth map generation

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11328446
  • Patent Number
    11,328,446
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, June 28, 2017
    7 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, May 10, 2022
    2 years ago
Abstract
Depths of one or more objects in a scene may be measured with enhanced accuracy through the use of a light-field camera and a depth sensor. The light-field camera may capture a light-field image of the scene. The depth sensor may capture depth sensor data of the scene. Light-field depth data may be extracted from the light-field image and used, in combination with the sensor depth data, to generate a depth map indicative of distance between the light-field camera and one or more objects in the scene. The depth sensor may be an active depth sensor that transmits electromagnetic energy toward the scene; the electromagnetic energy may be reflected off of the scene and detected by the active depth sensor. The active depth sensor may have a 360° field of view; accordingly, one or more mirrors may be used to direct the electromagnetic energy between the active depth sensor and the scene.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

The present disclosure relates to digital imaging. More precisely, the present disclosure relates to improved techniques for depth map generation.


BACKGROUND

Active depth sensors are technologies that can measure the position of points in space. Examples include Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR), Time of Flight (ToF) cameras such as the Kinect sensor available from Microsoft Corporation of Redmond, Wash., and/or the like. Accurate depth data can be used in many different industries, including, for example, computer vision (3D reconstruction, image/video segmentation, scene understanding), visual effects (camera tracking, relighting, compositing CG contents) and virtual/augmented reality.


Light-field technologies are able to generate imagery that can be used in order to produce a high resolution depth map. However, the obtained depth maps may, in some circumstances, lack accuracy, especially at regions where there is no texture or features that can aid in generation of the depth map. By contrast, known active depth sensors often provide depth information that is relatively low in resolution. Thus, neither the depth information obtained from a light-field image, nor that gathered from active depth sensors can, alone, provide accurate and high-resolution depth maps. This limits the role that depth information can play in the applications listed above.


SUMMARY

According to various embodiments, the system and method described herein provide enhanced depth map generation. Although the depth map generation afforded by light-field image processing can be inaccurate, the depth measurements from active depth sensing technologies can be highly accurate. Various embodiments described herein provide techniques for incorporating such depth measurements in order to improve and/or complement the depth maps obtained from light-field data.


For example, in some embodiments, LiDAR technologies can sense close and far away objects but, in general, the resolution (i.e., the number of 3D points they generate) is usually low. As another example, Time of Flight technologies usually generate a higher number of points, but the sensing range may be short (0.5-10 meters). Thus, depending on the application, one active depth sensing technology can be favored over the other, or they can also be combined with one another in order to achieve the desired effect or depth map accuracy.


In at least one embodiment, active depth sensing data can be combined with a light-field depth map so as to provide improved depth map generation. Sensor fusion techniques can be used to dramatically increase both the resolution and the accuracy of the depth maps.


For example, a light-field camera may capture a light-field image of the scene, and a depth sensor may capture depth sensor data of the scene. Light-field depth data may be extracted from the light-field image and used, in combination with the sensor depth data, to generate a depth map indicative of distance between the light-field camera and one or more objects in the scene.


The depth sensor may be an active depth sensor that transmits electromagnetic energy toward the scene; the electromagnetic energy may be reflected off of the scene and detected by the active depth sensor. For example, the active depth sensor may include LiDAR and/or Time of Flight technologies.


The active depth sensor may have a 360° field of view; accordingly, one or more mirrors may be used to direct the electromagnetic energy between the active depth sensor and the scene. The active depth sensor may emit electromagnetic energy generally radially at the mirror(s), and the mirrors may reflect the electromagnetic energy toward the scene. The electromagnetic energy may reflect off of the scene, back toward the mirror(s). Then, the mirrors may reflect the electromagnetic energy back toward the active depth sensor. The mirror(s) may be arranged in any of various shapes, including but not limited to conical, pyramidal, and multi-faceted shapes.


Using the light-field depth data and the depth sensor data to generate the depth map may include calibrating the light-field camera and/or the depth sensor to generate a correspondence between the sensor depth data and the light-field image, and applying a depth map generation algorithm to combine the sensor depth data with the light-field depth data. Calibrating the light-field camera and/or the depth sensor may include calibrating the mirror(s) by using the depth sensor to capture depth calibration data of a calibration scene containing a planar board positioned at one or more known orientations, and using the depth calibration data to ascertain locations of corners of the planar board in each of the one or more known orientations. The light-field camera may also be calibrated by capturing light-field calibration data of the calibration scene contemporaneously with capture of the depth calibration data, and establishing settings for the light-field camera in which the corners in the light-field calibration data are aligned with the corners in the depth calibration data.


Using the light-field depth data and the depth sensor data to generate the depth map may include creating a 3D data cost function based on multi-view geometry, applying heuristics to improve the 3D data cost function, and applying global optimization to generate the depth map using a Markov Random Field solution. These concepts will be described in greater detail below.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The accompanying drawings illustrate several embodiments. Together with the description, they serve to explain the principles of the embodiments. One skilled in the art will recognize that the particular embodiments illustrated in the drawings are merely exemplary, and are not intended to limit scope.



FIG. 1 depicts a portion of a light-field image.



FIG. 2 depicts an example of an architecture for implementing the methods of the present disclosure in a light-field capture device, according to one embodiment.



FIG. 3 depicts an example of an architecture for implementing the methods of the present disclosure in a post-processing system communicatively coupled to a light-field capture device, according to one embodiment.



FIG. 4 depicts an example of an architecture for a light-field camera for implementing the methods of the present disclosure according to one embodiment.



FIG. 5 is a schematic view of a system for imaging and depth determination, according to one embodiment.



FIG. 6 is a side view of an active depth sensor placed between two mirrors placed at a 90° angle relative to one another, with the active depth sensor centered between them, projecting light beams radially such that the light beams are reflected by the mirrors, according to one embodiment.



FIGS. 7A and 7B depict two different mirror reflector designs with a reflective surface that is, respectively, cone-shaped on the inside, with a circular opening, and pyramidal with four mirrors placed in a pyramid formation with a square opening, according to certain embodiments.



FIGS. 8A and 8B are side elevation, section views depicting the dimension of the opening for the reflected beams of light from, respectively, an active depth sensor utilizing the cone-shaped mirror reflector of FIG. 7A, and an active depth sensor using the pyramidal mirror reflector of FIG. 7B, according to certain embodiments.



FIGS. 9A and 9B are side elevation, section views depicting laser beams from a LiDAR VLP-16 centered in, respectively, the cone-shaped mirror reflector of FIG. 7A, and an active depth sensor using the pyramidal mirror reflector of FIG. 7B, according to certain embodiments.



FIG. 10 is a plot depicting the sampling points in an imaging plane perpendicular to the axis of rotation of a Velodyne VLP-16 LiDAR device and a conical mirror reflector design such as the cone-shaped mirror reflector of FIG. 7A, in which the sampling points form a group of 16 concentric circles, with the LiDAR laser beams projected into a field of view of 30°, according to one embodiment.



FIG. 11 is a polar plot depicting the projected energy vs. angle distribution, in units of Watts/Steradians (W/sr), for a Velodyne VLP-16 LiDAR device used with a conical mirror reflector design such as the cone-shaped mirror reflector of FIG. 7A, according to one embodiment.



FIG. 12 is a plot depicting the sampling points in an imaging plane perpendicular to the axis of rotation of a Velodyne VLP-16 LiDAR device and a pyramidal mirror reflector design such as the pyramidal mirror reflector of FIG. 7B, in which the sampling points form two rectangular grids, with the LiDAR laser beams projected into a total field of view that is approximately 90° in each dimension, with the overlap between vertical and horizontal scans contained within an approximately 30° field of view, according to one embodiment.



FIG. 13 is a polar plot depicting the projected energy vs. angle distribution, in units of Watts/Steradians (W/sr) for a Velodyne VLP-16 LiDAR device used with a pyramidal mirror reflector design such as the pyramidal mirror reflector of FIG. 7B in which the opening is slightly rectangular, according to one embodiment.



FIG. 14A depicts a multi-faceted reflector, according to one embodiment.



FIG. 14B is a plot depicting the pattern of sampling points gathered by the active depth sensor when placed within the multi-faceted reflector of FIG. 14A.



FIG. 15 depicts the sampling points in an imaging plane perpendicular to the axis of rotation of a Velodyne VLP-16 LiDAR device placed within a pyramid reflector design with 13 mirrors and a 13-sided regular polygon opening (tridecagon), in which the LiDAR laser beams are projected into a dense sampling pattern that is mostly contained within a field of view that is approximately 30° in each dimension, according to one embodiment.



FIG. 16 is an image depicting the LiDAR measurement points for objects in an imaging plane, according to one embodiment.



FIG. 17A depicts a planar board and an example of a projected LiDAR sensor pattern from a LiDAR sensor with a circular FOV, according to one embodiment.



FIG. 17B is a side view depicting alignment of corners in the board of FIG. 17A with each other, as viewed with different mirrors, according to one embodiment.



FIG. 18 is a representation of the thin lens equation, according to one embodiment.



FIG. 19 depicts comparisons between depth maps generated using the light-field data alone and those generated by combining the data from a LiDAR sensor with a circular FOV with the depth information obtained from the light-field data, according to one embodiment.





DEFINITIONS

For purposes of the description provided herein, the following definitions are used:

    • Active depth sensor: a depth sensor that transmits at least a portion of the energy that it will use to detect depth.
    • Conical shape: a 3D shape resembling a cone.
    • Conventional image: an image in which the pixel values are not, collectively or individually, indicative of the angle of incidence at which light is received by a camera.
    • Depth: a representation of distance between an object and/or corresponding image sample and a camera or camera element, such as the microlens array of a plenoptic light-field camera.
    • Depth map: an image indicative of the relative depths of objects and/or elements appearing in the depth map; typically used in conjunction with a conventional or light-field image to indicate the depth of objects appearing in the image.
    • Depth sensor: a sensor that detects the depth of one or more objects in a scene.
    • Disk: a region in a light-field image that is illuminated by light passing through a single microlens; may be circular or any other suitable shape.
    • Facet: a generally planar surface, such as a planar mirror present in a reflector with other mirrors.
    • Image: a two-dimensional array of pixel values, or pixels, each specifying a color.
    • Input device: any device that receives input from a user.
    • Light-field camera: any camera capable of capturing light-field images.
    • Light-field data: data indicative of the angle of incidence at which light is received by a camera.
    • Light-field image: an image that contains a representation of light-field data captured at the sensor.
    • Main lens: a lens or set of lenses that directs light from a scene toward an image sensor.
    • Microlens: a small lens, typically one in an array of similar microlenses.
    • Microlens array: an array of microlenses arranged in a predetermined pattern.
    • Mirror: an object that has a surface that is at least partially reflective of light.
    • Multi-faceted shape: a 3D shape with multiple facets, which may be, but are not required to, define a pyramidal shape.
    • Pyramidal shape: a 3D shape in which multiple facets join at a single point, typically with a planar (solid or open) base opposite the single point
    • Reflector: one or more mirrors.
    • Scene: a collection of one or more objects to be imaged and/or modeled.
    • Sensor, or “image sensor”: a light detector in a camera capable of generating electrical signals based on light received by the sensor.


In addition to the foregoing, additional terms will be set forth and defined in the description below. Terms not explicitly defined are to be interpreted, primarily, in a manner consistently with their usage and context herein, and, secondarily, in a manner consistent with their use in the art.


For ease of nomenclature, the term “camera” is used herein to refer to an image capture device or other data acquisition device. Such a data acquisition device can be any device or system for acquiring, recording, measuring, estimating, determining and/or computing data representative of a scene, including but not limited to two-dimensional image data, three-dimensional image data, and/or light-field data. Such a data acquisition device may include optics, sensors, and image processing electronics for acquiring data representative of a scene, using techniques that are well known in the art. One skilled in the art will recognize that many types of data acquisition devices can be used in connection with the present disclosure, and that the disclosure is not limited to cameras. Thus, the use of the term “camera” herein is intended to be illustrative and exemplary, but should not be considered to limit the scope of the disclosure. Specifically, any use of such term herein should be considered to refer to any suitable device for acquiring image data.


In the following description, several techniques and methods for processing light-field images are described. One skilled in the art will recognize that these various techniques and methods can be performed singly and/or in any suitable combination with one another. Further, many of the configurations and techniques described herein are applicable to conventional imaging as well as light-field imaging. Thus, although the following description focuses on light-field imaging, all of the following systems and methods may additionally or alternatively be used in connection with conventional digital imaging systems. In some cases, the needed modification is as simple as removing the microlens array from the configuration described for light-field imaging to convert the example into a configuration for conventional image capture.


Architecture


In at least one embodiment, the system and method described herein can be implemented in connection with light-field images captured by light-field capture devices including but not limited to those described in Ng et al., Light-field photography with a hand-held plenoptic capture device, Technical Report CSTR 2005-02, Stanford Computer Science. Further, any known depth sensing technology may be used.


Referring now to FIG. 2, there is shown a block diagram depicting an architecture for implementing the method of the present disclosure in a light-field capture device such as a camera 200, and in a depth sensor 250. Referring now also to FIG. 3, there is shown a block diagram depicting an architecture for implementing the method of the present disclosure in a post-processing system 300 communicatively coupled to a light-field capture device such as a camera 200 and/or a depth sensor such as the depth sensor 250, according to one embodiment. One skilled in the art will recognize that the particular configurations shown in FIGS. 2 and 3 are merely exemplary, and that other architectures are possible for camera 200, depth sensor 250, and post-processing system 300. One skilled in the art will further recognize that several of the components shown in the configurations of FIGS. 2 and 3 are optional, and may be omitted or reconfigured.


In at least one embodiment, camera 200 may be a light-field camera that includes light-field image data acquisition device 209 having optics 201, image sensor 203 (including a plurality of individual sensors for capturing pixels), and microlens array 202. Optics 201 may include, for example, aperture 212 for allowing a selectable amount of light into camera 200, and main lens 213 for focusing light toward microlens array 202. In at least one embodiment, microlens array 202 may be disposed and/or incorporated in the optical path of camera 200 (between main lens 213 and image sensor 203) so as to facilitate acquisition, capture, sampling of, recording, and/or obtaining light-field image data via image sensor 203. Referring now also to FIG. 4, there is shown an example of an architecture for a light-field camera, or camera 200, for implementing the method of the present disclosure according to one embodiment. The Fig. is not shown to scale. FIG. 4 shows, in conceptual form, the relationship between aperture 212, main lens 213, microlens array 202, and image sensor 203, as such components interact to capture light-field data for one or more objects, represented by an object 401, which may be part of a scene 402.


In at least one embodiment, camera 200 may also include a user interface 205 for allowing a user to provide input for controlling the operation of camera 200 for capturing, acquiring, storing, and/or processing image data. The user interface 205 may receive user input from the user via an input device 206, which may include any one or more user input mechanisms known in the art. For example, the input device 206 may include one or more buttons, switches, touch screens, gesture interpretation devices, pointing devices, and/or the like.


Further, in at least one embodiment, depth sensor 250 may be an active depth sensor that not only senses electromagnetic energy, but also emits the electromagnetic energy toward a scene for which depth information is desired. Thus, the depth sensor 250 may have an emitter 252 that emits the electromagnetic energy, and a sensor 253 that receives the electromagnetic energy after it has been reflected off of the scene. The depth sensor 250 may be of any known type, including but not limited to LiDAR and Time of Flight depth sensing devices.


Similarly, in at least one embodiment, post-processing system 300 may include a user interface 305 that allows the user to provide input to switch image capture modes, as will be set forth subsequently. The user interface 305 may additionally or alternatively facilitate the receipt of user input from the user to establish one or more other image capture parameters.


In at least one embodiment, camera 200 may also include control circuitry 210 for facilitating acquisition, sampling, recording, and/or obtaining light-field image data. The control circuitry 210 may, in particular, be used to switch image capture configurations such as the zoom level, resolution level, focus, and/or aperture size in response to receipt of the corresponding user input. For example, control circuitry 210 may manage and/or control (automatically or in response to user input) the acquisition timing, rate of acquisition, sampling, capturing, recording, and/or obtaining of light-field image data.


In at least one embodiment, camera 200 may include memory 211 for storing image data, such as output by image sensor 203. Such memory 211 can include external and/or internal memory. In at least one embodiment, memory 211 can be provided at a separate device and/or location from camera 200.


In at least one embodiment, captured image data is provided to post-processing circuitry 204. The post-processing circuitry 204 may be disposed in or integrated into light-field image data acquisition device 209, as shown in FIG. 2, or it may be in a separate component external to light-field image data acquisition device 209, as shown in FIG. 3. Such separate component may be local or remote with respect to light-field image data acquisition device 209. Any suitable wired or wireless protocol may be used for transmitting image data 321 to circuitry 204; for example, the camera 200 can transmit image data 321 and/or other data via the Internet, a cellular data network, a Wi-Fi network, a Bluetooth communication protocol, and/or any other suitable means. Likewise, any suitable wired or wireless protocol may be used by the depth sensor 250 to transmit the depth data 322 and/or other data to circuitry 204.


Such a separate component may include any of a wide variety of computing devices, including but not limited to computers, smartphones, tablets, cameras, and/or any other device that processes digital information. Such a separate component may include additional features such as a user input 315 and/or a display screen 316. If desired, light-field image data may be displayed for the user on the display screen 316.


Overview


Light-field images often include a plurality of projections (which may be circular or of other shapes) of aperture 212 of camera 200, each projection taken from a different vantage point on the camera's focal plane. The light-field image may be captured on image sensor 203. The interposition of microlens array 202 between main lens 213 and image sensor 203 causes images of aperture 212 to be formed on image sensor 203, each microlens in microlens array 202 projecting a small image of main-lens aperture 212 onto image sensor 203. These aperture-shaped projections are referred to herein as disks, although they need not be circular in shape. The term “disk” is not intended to be limited to a circular region, but can refer to a region of any shape.


Light-field images include four dimensions of information describing light rays impinging on the focal plane of camera 200 (or other capture device). Two spatial dimensions (herein referred to as x and y) are represented by the disks themselves. For example, the spatial resolution of a light-field image with 120,000 disks, arranged in a Cartesian pattern 400 wide and 300 high, is 400×300. Two angular dimensions (herein referred to as u and v) are represented as the pixels within an individual disk. For example, the angular resolution of a light-field image with 100 pixels within each disk, arranged as a 10×10 Cartesian pattern, is 10×10. This light-field image has a 4-D (x,y,u,v) resolution of (400,300,10,10). Referring now to FIG. 1, there is shown an example of a 2-disk by 2-disk portion of such a light-field image, including depictions of disks 102 and individual pixels 101; for illustrative purposes, each disk 102 is ten pixels 101 across.


In at least one embodiment, the 4-D light-field representation may be reduced to a 2-D image through a process of projection and reconstruction. As described in more detail in related U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 13/774,971 for “Compensating for Variation in Microlens Position During Light-Field Image Processing,”, filed Feb. 22, 2013, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety, a virtual surface of projection may be introduced, and the intersections of representative rays with the virtual surface can be computed. The color of each representative ray may be taken to be equal to the color of its corresponding pixel.


Active Depth Sensing


As mentioned previously, data from an active sensor may be combined with the depth maps generated from light-field data to obtain more accurate depth maps. In at least one embodiment, the system includes an active depth sensor that estimates distance by emitting a laser or light pulse (for example, at an infra-red wavelength) and measuring the time it gets reflected back to the sensor.


Referring to FIG. 5, a system 500 for imaging and depth determination is depicted, according to one embodiment. The system 500 may be designed to capture light-field images and or video of a scene 510. The scene 510 may be illuminated by one or more visible light sources 520, each of which may project visible light 530 at the scene 510. The system may include a light-field camera 540 and an active depth sensor 550.


The light-field camera 540 may be of any known type. In some embodiments, the light-field camera 540 may be a plenoptic light-field camera, such as the camera 200 of FIGS. 2 and 3. In alternative embodiments, the light-field camera 540 may be a different type of light-field camera, such as a tiled array of conventional cameras that, combined, capture visible light to generate light-field images and/or video. The light-field camera 540 may receive visible light 530 from the scene 510 to generate the light-field images and/or video.


The active depth sensor 550 may be any type of active depth sensor. The active depth sensor 550 may estimate distance by emitting a laser or light pulse (for example, at an infrared wavelength) and measure the time required for the light pulse to be reflected back to the active depth sensor 550. In some embodiments, the active depth sensor 550 may be a Time of Flight sensor, a LiDAR sensor, and/or the like. The active depth sensor 550 may transmit electromagnetic energy 560, which may or may not have a frequency within the visible spectrum, toward the scene 510. The electromagnetic energy 560 may reflect from the scene 510 as reflected electromagnetic energy 570, which may then be received and detected by the active depth sensor 550. The resulting depth data may be used to enhance the accuracy of depth maps computed from the light-field images and/or video captured by the light-field camera 540.


In alternative embodiments, any type of depth sensor may be used in place of the active depth sensor 550. A depth sensor that is not an active depth sensor may not transmit its own electromagnetic energy, but may instead simply receive electromagnetic energy transmitted from other sources. For example, the light sources 520 may transmit electromagnetic energy, in the form of visible light and/or electromagnetic energy outside the visible spectrum, which can be detected by the depth sensor.


Depth sensors such as active depth sensors can be used to measure the depth profile of objects. Their use can add to the accuracy of the depth measurement derived from a light-field camera. This is especially true for imaging regions that are monochromatic and featureless. The active depth sensor 550 may help add detail to the depth maps generated by the light-field camera 540 alone. As mentioned above, active depth sensors can include, for example, Light Detector and Ranging (LiDAR) scanning devices and/or Time of Flight (ToF) cameras.


Many known LiDAR sensors are adapted to be used with autonomous vehicles and can emit laser pulses with a 360 degree horizontal field of view (FOV). In many such implementations, the horizontal resolution is 0.1°-0.4°, depending on the speed with which the laser emitter rotates. The accuracy of depth measurement can typically vary by up to 3 cm for a range up to 100-150 meters. For dark (e.g. black) surfaces, the measurement range is often dramatically decreased; for example, in some environments it has been observed that the LiDAR sensor measures up to 5 meters for black matte surfaces.


Many Time of Flight cameras make use of the known speed of light in order to calculate distances. This may be done by measuring the time of flight of a light signal between the camera and each point of the image. In a time of flight camera, the depth of the entire scene may be captured with each light pulse, as opposed to a point by point approach as in LiDAR systems. Another difference with respect to a LiDAR is that the FOV of a ToF system is usually forward facing, i.e., non-circular.


LiDAR and Time of Flight sensors are merely exemplary technologies that may be incorporated into the active depth sensor 550; other known technologies for sensing depth maybe used. Further, the characteristics and parameters described herein are merely exemplary. The techniques described herein can be implemented using equipment having other characteristics.


LiDAR Reflectors


Many commercially available active depth sensors make measurements over a field of view (FOV) that is much larger than a typical field of view for a light-field camera. For example, the Velodyne VLP-16 device scans with sixteen lasers in a circular 360° field of view in the plane of rotation (the “azimuthal coordinate”) of the device, and +/−15° in the plane perpendicular to the plane of rotation (the “polar coordinate”). A photosensor, such as a photosensor that receives light through a tapered fiber optic bundle, as described in the above-referenced U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/451,831, may be 560 mm by 316 mm, and may be used with a lens having a 1210 mm focal length; the corresponding field of view may be about 26° in the horizontal direction, and 15° in the vertical direction.


To measure depth of objects from a camera, it may be advantageous to reflect the beams of light from the active depth sensor 550 so that they are projected into a smaller angular region that more closely matches the field of view of the light-field camera 540. This technique may be used to avoid projecting the beams of light into places the light-field camera 540 cannot image, and instead redirect them to be more concentrated so the spatial sampling of the active depth sensor 550 within the field of view of the light-field camera 540 is increased. As previously mentioned, many active depth sensors, such as LiDAR sensors, have circular fields-of-view (FOVs). Accordingly, in at least one embodiment, the cylindrical FOV of the active depth sensing device is adapted to a forward-looking light-field capture system using a specialized mirror system that reflects and directs the active depth sensor samples to the front.



FIGS. 6, 7A, and 7B depict exemplary architectures for mirror designs to concentrate samples from an active depth sensor system such as LiDAR. The embodiments of FIGS. 6 and 7B have mirror systems with four planar mirrors, arranged in a pyramidal shape. FIG. 7A depicts a variation wherein a conical design is used for the mirror, which in some cases can better facilitate use of all of the LiDAR samples.


Specifically, FIG. 6 is a side view of an active depth sensor 600 placed between two mirrors 610. The two mirrors 610 may be placed at a 90° angle relative to one another, with the active depth sensor 600 centered between them, projecting light beams 620 radially. In at least one embodiment, the active depth sensor 600 may be a Velodyne VLP-16 LiDAR disk that projects 16 lasers radially with various angles (for example, −15°, −13°, −11°, −9°, −7°, −5°, −3°, −1°, 1°, 3°, 5°, 7°, 9°, 11°, 13°, and 15°) relative to the plane of rotation. In this configuration, all the light beams projected from the LiDAR may be reflected by the mirrors into the opening defined by these mirrors. The light beams may be projected with an angular spread that can overlap with the camera's field of view.


In three dimensions, it may be advantageous for the mirrored surfaces of the reflector to be arranged so they surround the active depth sensor in such a way as to reflect all the beams from the active depth sensor toward the opening in those mirrors. As shown in FIGS. 7A and 7B, two basic designs for a reflector for an active depth sensor may include conical and pyramidal reflectors. In FIG. 7A, a cone-shaped reflector 700 has a surface that is cone-shaped on the inside, with a circular opening 710. In FIG. 7B, a square pyramidal reflector 750 may have four mirrors placed in a pyramid formation with a square opening 760. The square pyramidal reflector 750 may include three or more mirrored sides, with an opening that has the shape of a regular or irregular polygon.



FIGS. 8A and 8B are side elevation, section views depicting exemplary dimensioning for the reflectors of FIGS. 7A and 7B, respectively. In at least one embodiment, the non-mirrored opening 710 in the cone-shaped reflector 700 has a diameter of 420 mm, as shown in FIG. 8A. Further, in at least one embodiment, the non-mirrored opening 760 in the square pyramidal reflector 750 is a square with a side 420 mm in length, as shown in FIG. 8B. Further, in at least one embodiment, the non-mirrored opening 760 is a regular 13-sided polygon called a tridecagon, and the design contains 13 mirrors.



FIGS. 9A and 9B are side elevation, section views depicting exemplary rays projected with use of the reflectors of FIGS. 7A and 7B, respectively. Centered between the mirrors in either the pyramid or conical configuration, the active depth sensor 730 may project rays 900 that are reflected by the walls of the mirror cavity and focused onto a plane perpendicular to the axis of rotation of the active depth sensor 730 as shown in FIGS. 9A and 9B, for the conical reflector 700 and the square pyramidal reflector 750, respectively. This plane perpendicular to axis of rotation of the active depth sensor 730 may advantageously correspond to the field of view of the light-field camera (for example, the light-field camera 540 of FIG. 5) with which the active depth sensor 730 is to be used.



FIG. 10 is a plot depicting the pattern 1000 of sampling points gathered by the active depth sensor 730 when placed within the conical reflector 700 of FIG. 7A. The pattern of sampling points gathered by the active depth sensor 730 may be dependent on the mirror configuration. In at least one embodiment, corresponding to a conical mirror reflector design, and using the Velodyne VLP-16 LiDAR device, the sampling points in an imaging plane perpendicular to the axis of rotation of the LiDAR form the pattern 1000 with sixteen concentric circles 1010, as shown in FIG. 10. The LiDAR laser beams may be projected into a field of view of 30°. FIG. 11 is a polar plot 1100 showing the resulting projected energy vs. angle distribution, in units of Watts/Steradians (W/sr), for the pattern 1000 of sampling points of FIG. 10.



FIG. 12 is a plot depicting the pattern 1200 of sampling points gathered by the active depth sensor 730 when placed within the pyramidal reflector 750 of FIG. 7B. In at least one embodiment, corresponding to a pyramidal mirror reflector design in which the non-mirrored opening is slightly rectangular in shape and using the Velodyne VLP-16 LiDAR device, the sampling points in an imaging plane perpendicular to the axis of rotation of the LiDAR may form the pattern 1200 with a field of view 1210 of 90° in one direction and a field of view 1220 of 30° in the orthogonal direction. Different colors represent samples reflected from different mirrors. The pattern 1200 thus may have a cross pattern with a roughly 90-by-90-degree field of view, and a high resolution central 30-by-30-degree region. FIG. 13 is a polar plot 1300 showing the resulting projected energy vs. angle distribution, in units of Watts/Steradians (W/sr), for the pattern 1200 of sampling points of FIG. 12.



FIG. 14A depicts a multi-faceted reflector 1400, according to another embodiment. The reflector 1400 may have five facets, as shown. However, the multi-faceted reflector 1400 is intended as a generalized example; any number of planar mirrors may be used. Larger numbers of facets may be present, if desired.



FIG. 14B is a plot depicting the pattern 1450 of sampling points gathered by the active depth sensor 730 when placed within the multi-faceted reflector 1400 of FIG. 14A. In at least one embodiment, corresponding to a five-faceted reflector in which the non-mirrored opening is pentagonal in shape, the sampling points in an imaging plane perpendicular to the axis of rotation of the LiDAR may form the pattern 1450 with five fields-of-view 1460, displaced from each other in 72° increments.



FIG. 15 is a plot depicting the pattern 1500 of sampling points gathered by the active depth sensor 730 when placed within a multi-faceted reflector (not shown) with thirteen facets. In at least one other embodiment, corresponding to a regular 13-sided tridecagon pyramidal mirror reflector design, containing 13 mirrors, and using the Velodyne VLP-16 LiDAR device, the sampling points in an imaging plane perpendicular to the axis of rotation of the LiDAR may form a grid with thirteen fields-of-view 1510 of 27.7° in the orthogonal direction.


One advantage of using a configuration with a number of mirrors that is much higher than 4 is that the pattern of sampling points is more evenly distributed across a field of view that is more narrow. For example, in the case of the 13-sided mirror design, the field of view may be 27.7°, compared with a 90° field of view for the 4-sided mirror design. This narrow field of view may better match the field of view of the light-field camera 540, and may thus result in more samples for objects that appear in the light-field images and/or light-field video captured by the light-field camera 540.



FIG. 16 is an image 1600 depicting the LiDAR measurement points for objects in an imaging plane, according to one embodiment. The spots 1610 and the spots 1620 on the image 1600 of the soldier represent LiDAR sampling measurement points. Each of the black spots 1610 may designate an intersection of the scanning beam with the foreground object (the soldier), while each of the white spots 1620 may designate the intersection of the scanning beam with the plane in the background.


Active Depth Sensor Data Processing


In at least one embodiment, active depth information is used to augment acquired light-field data, so as to generate better depth maps. First, a correspondence may be generated between the active depth samples and the rays in a light-field image. Then, a depth map generation algorithm may be used to combine the depth information from the active depth sensor with that of the light-field data.


Calibration: Overview


Calibration may be performed to establish a correspondence between an active depth sensor sample in the sensor's coordinates x=(x,y,z) and a pixel in the image space (u,v,λ). In at least one embodiment, the following formula is used to transfer an active depth coordinate to image space:







[



u




v



]

=

PTM




[



x




y




z



]







λ
=

g


(
z
)







where M is the mirror reflection transformation, P is the camera intrinsic matrix, T is the active depth sensor to camera transformation matrix, and g is a function that converts the world-space distance z to the lambda space λ.


In at least one embodiment, calibration includes four steps: camera calibration (P), LiDAR-camera calibration (T), depth calibration (g) and, for the case of active depth sensors with cylindrical FOVs, a mirror calibration (M) step. If there is no circular FOV in the active depth sensor, or no mirror or similar systems are used, the mirror calibration step M can be omitted.


Mirror Calibration


In at least one embodiment, mirror calibration involves scanning a rectangular planar board using the mirror system. The board may be rotated about 45° (in plane) relative to the mirror system, so that the active depth sensor scanlines are roughly diagonal across the board. This may be done so that the corners of the board can be computed: when the board is tilted, the end points of the scanlines can be used to compute all four edges of the board and then find the corners. In general, there should be enough active depth sensor scanlines (at least three or four) from each mirror covering the entire board.



FIG. 17A depicts a planar board 1700 and an example of a projected LiDAR sensor pattern from a LiDAR sensor with a circular FOV, according to one embodiment. Different colors represent the reflected LiDAR samples from different mirrors. In at least one embodiment, this process is repeated a few times by changing the distance between the board 1700 and the active depth sensor (which in this example is, once again, a LiDAR sensor with a circular FOV). The mirror calibration may find the plane equations defining the four planar mirrors.


A plane can be represented by

n·x+w=0

where n is the normalized vector of the plane normal and w is the plane distance to origin. A point x that is reflected by the mirror has a new coordinate x′.

x′=x−2(n·x+w)n=M(n,w,x)

where M is the mirror reflection transformation, which depends on the unknown n and w.


For each quadrant of LiDAR samples (corresponding to one of the four mirrors), the four corners of the board xij may be computed, where the subscript i is for the ith corner and j is for the jth mirror. After mirror reflection, each reflected corner x′ij from all four mirrors should align with each other. FIG. 17B illustrates an example of this in a 2D side view 1750.


This yields the following optimization:








{


n
k

,

w
k


}



k
=
1

,
2
,
3
,
4


=

arg





min





i
=
1

4






j
=
2

4







x
ij


-

x

i





1






2








This is a nonlinear optimization. The gradient may be computed numerically, for example using finite difference. Once the optimization is solved, the four plane equations can transform the LiDAR samples x from the LiDAR space to the LiDAR-mirror space x′.


Camera Calibration


In at least one embodiment, a standard camera calibration process is used to find the intrinsic projection matrix P and the lens distortion parameters (which are usually very small and can be ignored if the image has been undistorted). For example, a chessboard pattern can be captured many times at different locations and/or orientations. During the capture process, it may be preferable for the entire chessboard to be seen in the camera, without necessarily occupying the entire field of view. The images may be captured with focus settings that cause the chessboard to be in focus and sharp. Usually, ten to twenty images are sufficient for one focus distance. In at least one embodiment, separate camera calibrations are performed for different focus distances; linear interpolation may be performed between them to obtain calibrations for intermediate distances.


Active Depth Sensor to Camera Calibration


The purpose of Active Depth Sensor to Camera calibration is to find the relative transformation (rotation R and translation t) between the active depth sensor and the camera. The calibration procedure of this step may be very similar to that of mirror calibration. The difference is that when the planar board is scanned by the active depth sensor, it is also captured as an image by the camera. For each corner of the board (xi, yi, zi) in the active depth sensor space, there is a corresponding pixel for that corner in the image space (ui, vi). This formulates another optimization problem:






T
=

arg





min




i







[




u
i






v
i




]

-

PTM


[




x
i






y
i






z
i




]





2







Note that in the above equation, the matrix P is known from the camera calibration step and, for the case of LiDAR sensors (or similar active depth sensors) with circular FOVs, the matrix M is known from the mirror calibration step. The only unknown here is the transformation matrix T=[R t]. This optimization is nonlinear, and can be solved by known nonlinear optimization software.


Depth Calibration


Depth calibration may be used to find the relationship between the distances in the world space and the lambda space. The thin lens equation may provide a suitable starting point:







1
f

=


1
z

+

1

i
-

λ






f
mla










where f is the focal length of the main lens, fmla is the focal length of the microlens array, or MLA, z is the distance from an object point to the main lens, and i is the distance between the main lens and MLA, which may be given by the readings of the focus motor.



FIG. 18 is a representation 1800 of the thin lens equation (set forth above), according to one embodiment. The representation 1800 depicts relative positions between a main lens 1810, a microlens array (MLA) 1820, and a subject 1830 to be captured.


After mathematical derivations, the following two formulas may convert the distance from the world space (z) to the lambda space (λ) and vice versa:






λ
=


i
-

zf

z
-
f




f
mla








z
=


f


(

i
-

λ






f
mla



)



i
-

λ






f
mla


-
f







Depth Fusion Between Active Depth Sensor Data and Light-Field


In at least one embodiment, active depth sensor data is combined with light-field data to generate a more accurate depth map, using the following three steps:


1. Data cost function creation;


2. Data cost function massage; and


3. Application of a solver such as Markov Random Field (MRF).


In the first step, a 3D data cost function C(u,v,λ) may be created based on multi-view geometry, using, for example, a function in a light-field pipeline. Intuitively, the data cost function may indicate how unlikely the depth is equal to λ at pixel (u,v). The larger the cost, the less likely that the depth is equal to λ.


In the second step, the data cost function may be modified (improved) using heuristics. In at least one embodiment, a cross-based aggregation heuristic is used, which indicates that two adjacent pixels with similar color probably have similar depth.


The last step is a global optimization to find the depth map λ(u,v), using a solver such as an MRF solution. This optimization may have two objectives: a per-pixel data cost that minimizes C(u,v,λ), and a smoothness cost that minimizes the variation of depth among adjacent pixels.


To fuse active depth sensor data, an additional step can be added between the first and second steps set forth above. After the cost volume has been created from light-field data, the value may be modified to accommodate the active depth sensor samples. After each active depth sensor sample (xi, yi, zi) is converted to the image space (ui, vi, λi) using the calibration results, the data cost volume may be modified as follows:

C(ui,vi,λ)=w|λ−λi|

where w is the weight that specifies the influence of the active depth sensor data.


Two other possible alternatives are quadratic cost:

C(ui,vi,λ)=w(λ−λi)2


and the delta cost:







C


(


u
i

,

v
i

,
λ

)


=

{




0





if





λ

=

λ
i


;








otherwise



.







Results


The above pipeline can greatly improve the quality of depth maps. FIG. 19 depicts comparisons 1900 between depth maps generated using the light-field data alone and those generated by combining the data from a LiDAR sensor with a circular FOV with the depth information obtained from the light-field data, according to one embodiment. In each case, the left-hand image is the depth map generated using the light-field data alone, and the right-hand drawing depicts a depth map generated by combining LiDAR depth data and light-field depth data.


Variations


In various embodiments, the techniques described herein can be used in connection with different active depth sensing technologies in addition to (or instead of) LiDAR or ToF cameras. According to some examples, forward-facing LiDAR sensors such as Solid State LiDAR sensors may be used.


In various embodiments, the depth calibration process can involve a space different from the lambda space or if the cost volume is generated in world coordinates, such depth calibration step can be omitted. Those of skill in the art will recognize that various other aspects of the systems and methods may be utilized, within the scope of the present disclosure.


The above description and referenced drawings set forth particular details with respect to possible embodiments. Those of skill in the art will appreciate that the techniques described herein may be practiced in other embodiments. First, the particular naming of the components, capitalization of terms, the attributes, data structures, or any other programming or structural aspect is not mandatory or significant, and the mechanisms that implement the techniques described herein may have different names, formats, or protocols. Further, the system may be implemented via a combination of hardware and software, as described, or entirely in hardware elements, or entirely in software elements. Also, the particular division of functionality between the various system components described herein is merely exemplary, and not mandatory; functions performed by a single system component may instead be performed by multiple components, and functions performed by multiple components may instead be performed by a single component.


Reference in the specification to “one embodiment” or to “an embodiment” means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiments is included in at least one embodiment. The appearances of the phrase “in one embodiment” in various places in the specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment.


Some embodiments may include a system or a method for performing the above-described techniques, either singly or in any combination. Other embodiments may include a computer program product comprising a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium and computer program code, encoded on the medium, for causing a processor in a computing device or other electronic device to perform the above-described techniques.


Some portions of the above are presented in terms of algorithms and symbolic representations of operations on data bits within a memory of a computing device. These algorithmic descriptions and representations are the means used by those skilled in the data processing arts to most effectively convey the substance of their work to others skilled in the art. An algorithm is here, and generally, conceived to be a self-consistent sequence of steps (instructions) leading to a desired result. The steps are those requiring physical manipulations of physical quantities. Usually, though not necessarily, these quantities take the form of electrical, magnetic or optical signals capable of being stored, transferred, combined, compared and otherwise manipulated. It is convenient at times, principally for reasons of common usage, to refer to these signals as bits, values, elements, symbols, characters, terms, numbers, or the like. Furthermore, it is also convenient at times, to refer to certain arrangements of steps requiring physical manipulations of physical quantities as modules or code devices, without loss of generality.


It should be borne in mind, however, that all of these and similar terms are to be associated with the appropriate physical quantities and are merely convenient labels applied to these quantities. Unless specifically stated otherwise as apparent from the following discussion, it is appreciated that throughout the description, discussions utilizing terms such as “processing” or “computing” or “calculating” or “displaying” or “determining” or the like, refer to the action and processes of a computer system, or similar electronic computing module and/or device, that manipulates and transforms data represented as physical (electronic) quantities within the computer system memories or registers or other such information storage, transmission or display devices.


Certain aspects include process steps and instructions described herein in the form of an algorithm. It should be noted that the process steps and instructions of described herein can be embodied in software, firmware and/or hardware, and when embodied in software, can be downloaded to reside on and be operated from different platforms used by a variety of operating systems.


Some embodiments relate to an apparatus for performing the operations described herein. This apparatus may be specially constructed for the required purposes, or it may comprise a general-purpose computing device selectively activated or reconfigured by a computer program stored in the computing device. Such a computer program may be stored in a computer readable storage medium, such as, but is not limited to, any type of disk including floppy disks, optical disks, CD-ROMs, magnetic-optical disks, read-only memories (ROMs), random access memories (RAMs), EPROMs, EEPROMs, flash memory, solid state drives, magnetic or optical cards, application specific integrated circuits (ASICs), and/or any type of media suitable for storing electronic instructions, and each coupled to a computer system bus. Further, the computing devices referred to herein may include a single processor or may be architectures employing multiple processor designs for increased computing capability.


The algorithms and displays presented herein are not inherently related to any particular computing device, virtualized system, or other apparatus. Various general-purpose systems may also be used with programs in accordance with the teachings herein, or it may prove convenient to construct more specialized apparatus to perform the required method steps. The required structure for a variety of these systems will be apparent from the description provided herein. In addition, the techniques set forth herein are not described with reference to any particular programming language. It will be appreciated that a variety of programming languages may be used to implement the techniques described herein, and any references above to specific languages are provided for illustrative purposes only.


Accordingly, in various embodiments, the techniques described herein can be implemented as software, hardware, and/or other elements for controlling a computer system, computing device, or other electronic device, or any combination or plurality thereof. Such an electronic device can include, for example, a processor, an input device (such as a keyboard, mouse, touchpad, trackpad, joystick, trackball, microphone, and/or any combination thereof), an output device (such as a screen, speaker, and/or the like), memory, long-term storage (such as magnetic storage, optical storage, and/or the like), and/or network connectivity, according to techniques that are well known in the art. Such an electronic device may be portable or nonportable. Examples of electronic devices that may be used for implementing the techniques described herein include: a mobile phone, personal digital assistant, smartphone, kiosk, server computer, enterprise computing device, desktop computer, laptop computer, tablet computer, consumer electronic device, television, set-top box, or the like. An electronic device for implementing the techniques described herein may use any operating system such as, for example: Linux; Microsoft Windows, available from Microsoft Corporation of Redmond, Wash.; Mac OS X, available from Apple Inc. of Cupertino, Calif.; iOS, available from Apple Inc. of Cupertino, Calif.; Android, available from Google, Inc. of Mountain View, Calif.; and/or any other operating system that is adapted for use on the device.


In various embodiments, the techniques described herein can be implemented in a distributed processing environment, networked computing environment, or web-based computing environment. Elements can be implemented on client computing devices, servers, routers, and/or other network or non-network components. In some embodiments, the techniques described herein are implemented using a client/server architecture, wherein some components are implemented on one or more client computing devices and other components are implemented on one or more servers. In one embodiment, in the course of implementing the techniques of the present disclosure, client(s) request content from server(s), and server(s) return content in response to the requests. A browser may be installed at the client computing device for enabling such requests and responses, and for providing a user interface by which the user can initiate and control such interactions and view the presented content.


Any or all of the network components for implementing the described technology may, in some embodiments, be communicatively coupled with one another using any suitable electronic network, whether wired or wireless or any combination thereof, and using any suitable protocols for enabling such communication. One example of such a network is the Internet, although the techniques described herein can be implemented using other networks as well.


While a limited number of embodiments has been described herein, those skilled in the art, having benefit of the above description, will appreciate that other embodiments may be devised which do not depart from the scope of the claims. In addition, it should be noted that the language used in the specification has been principally selected for readability and instructional purposes, and may not have been selected to delineate or circumscribe the inventive subject matter. Accordingly, the disclosure is intended to be illustrative, but not limiting.

Claims
  • 1. A method for measuring depths of at least one object in a scene, the method comprising: with a light-field camera, capturing a light-field image of the scene;with a depth sensor, capturing depth sensor data of the scene;extracting light-field depth data from the captured light-field image;combining the extracted light-field depth data with the captured depth sensor data to generate a depth map indicative of distance between the light-field camera and each object in the scene by: calibrating the light-field camera, depth sensor, or both to generate a correspondence between the sensor depth data and the light-field image, wherein calibrating the light-field camera, depth sensor, or both comprises: with the depth sensor, capturing depth calibration data of a calibration scene containing a planar board positioned at one or more known orientations;capturing light-field calibration data of the calibration scene contemporaneously with capture of the depth calibration data;using the depth calibration data to ascertain locations of corners of the planar board in each of one or more known orientations; andestablishing settings for the light-field camera in which the corners in the light-field calibration data are aligned with the corners in the depth calibration data;creating a 3D data cost function indicating a likelihood of a depth for at least a portion of the scene based on multi-view geometry;applying cross-based aggregation heuristics to improve the 3D data cost function; andapplying at least one of local and global optimization to generate the depth map; andoutputting the generated depth map.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein: the depth sensor comprises an active depth sensor;the method further comprises, prior to capturing the depth sensor data, transmitting electromagnetic energy toward the scene with the active depth sensor; andcapturing the depth sensor data comprises: receiving the electromagnetic energy after reflection of the electromagnetic energy off of the scene; andbased on receipt of the electromagnetic energy, generating the depth sensor data.
  • 3. The method of claim 2, wherein the active depth sensor comprises a LiDAR sensor.
  • 4. The method of claim 2, wherein the active depth sensor comprises a Time of Flight sensor.
  • 5. The method of claim 2, wherein: the active depth sensor has a 360° field of view;transmitting the electromagnetic energy toward the scene comprises: with the active depth sensor, emitting electromagnetic energy generally radially outward from the active depth sensor; andwith one or more mirrors, reflecting the emitted electromagnetic energy toward the scene; andreceiving the electromagnetic energy comprises, with the one or more mirrors, reflecting the emitted electromagnetic energy generally radially inward toward the active depth sensor.
  • 6. The method of claim 5, wherein the one or more mirrors are arranged to define a conical shape.
  • 7. The method of claim 5, wherein the one or more mirrors are arranged to define a pyramidal shape.
  • 8. The method of claim 5, wherein the one or more mirrors are arranged to define a multi-faceted shape comprising more than four facets.
  • 9. The method of claim 1, wherein using the light-field depth data and the depth sensor data to generate the depth map further comprises applying a depth map generation algorithm to combine the sensor depth data with the light-field depth data.
  • 10. The method of claim 1, wherein using the light-field depth data and the depth sensor data to generate the depth map further comprises: modifying the 3D data cost function to accommodate a plurality of depth sensor samples from the depth sensor data of the scene.
  • 11. A non-transitory computer-readable medium for measuring depths of at least one object in a scene, comprising instructions stored thereon, that when executed by a processor, perform the steps of: receiving a light-field image of a scene, wherein the light-field image has been captured with a light-field camera;receiving depth sensor data of the scene, wherein the depth sensor data has been captured with a depth sensor;extracting light-field depth data from the captured light-field image;combining the extracted light-field depth data with the captured depth sensor data to generate a depth map indicative of distance between the light-field camera and each object in the scene by: calibrating the light-field camera, depth sensor, or both to generate a correspondence between the sensor depth data and the light-field image, wherein calibrating the light-field camera, depth sensor, or both comprises: with the depth sensor, capturing depth calibration data of a calibration scene containing a planar board positioned at one or more known orientations;capturing light-field calibration data of the calibration scene contemporaneously with capture of the depth calibration data;using the depth calibration data to ascertain locations of corners of the planar board in each of one or more known orientations; andestablishing settings for the light-field camera in which the corners in the light-field calibration data are aligned with the corners in the depth calibration data;creating a 3D data cost function based on multi-view geometry;applying cross-based aggregation heuristics to improve the 3D data cost function; andapplying at least one of local and global optimization to generate the depth map; andoutputting the generated depth map.
  • 12. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 11, wherein using the light-field depth data and the depth sensor data to generate the depth map further comprises: modifying the 3D data cost function to accommodate a plurality of depth sensor samples from the depth sensor data of the scene.
  • 13. A system for measuring depths of at least one object in a scene, the system comprising: a light-field camera configured to capture a light-field image of the scene;a depth sensor configured to capture depth sensor data of the scene; anda processor, communicatively coupled to the light-field camera and the depth sensor, configured to: extract light-field depth data from the captured light-field image; andcombine the extracted light-field depth data with the captured depth sensor data to generate a depth map indicative of distance between the light-field camera and each object in the scene by: calibrating the light-field camera, depth sensor, or both to generate a correspondence between the sensor depth data and the light-field image, wherein calibrating the light-field camera, depth sensor, or both comprises: with the depth sensor, capturing depth calibration data of a calibration scene containing a planar board positioned at one or more known orientations;capturing light-field calibration data of the calibration scene contemporaneously with capture of the depth calibration data;using the depth calibration data to ascertain locations of corners of the planar board in each of one or more known orientations; andestablishing settings for the light-field camera in which the corners in the light-field calibration data are aligned with the corners in the depth calibration data;creating a 3D data cost function indicating a likelihood of a depth for at least a portion of the scene based on multi-view geometry;applying cross-based aggregation heuristics to improve the 3D data cost function; andapplying at least one of local and global optimization to generate the depth map; andan output device, communicatively coupled to the processor, configured to output the generated depth map.
  • 14. The system of claim 13, wherein: the depth sensor comprises an active depth sensor;the active depth sensor comprises an emitter configured, prior to capture of the depth sensor data, to transmit electromagnetic energy toward the scene with the active depth sensor; andthe active depth sensor is further configured to capture the depth sensor data by: receiving the electromagnetic energy after reflection of the electromagnetic energy off of the scene; andbased on receipt of the electromagnetic energy, generating the depth sensor data.
  • 15. The system of claim 14, wherein the active depth sensor comprises at least one of a LiDAR sensor and a Time of Flight sensor.
  • 16. The system of claim 14, wherein: the active depth sensor is configured to transmit the electromagnetic energy toward the scene by, with the emitter, emitting electromagnetic energy generally radially outward; andthe active depth sensor further comprises: a sensor with a 360° field of view; andone or more mirrors positioned proximate the active depth sensor to reflect the emitted electromagnetic energy toward the scene, and to reflect the emitted electromagnetic energy generally radially inward toward the sensor after the emitted electromagnetic energy has reflected off the scene.
  • 17. The system of claim 16, wherein the one or more mirrors are arranged to define a conical shape.
  • 18. The system of claim 16, wherein the one or more mirrors are arranged to define a pyramidal shape.
  • 19. The system of claim 16, wherein the one or more mirrors are arranged to define a multi-faceted shape comprising more than four facets.
  • 20. The system of claim 13, wherein the depth sensor further comprises: a sensor; andone or more mirrors that reflect electromagnetic energy to and/or from the sensor;wherein the depth sensor is calibrated to generate the correspondence via calibration of the one or more mirrors.
  • 21. The system of claim 13, wherein the processor is further configured to use the light-field depth data and the depth sensor data to generate the depth map by: modifying the 3D data cost function to accommodate a plurality of depth sensor samples from the depth sensor data of the scene.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/359,022 for “Combining Light-Field Data with Active Depth Data for Depth Map Generation,”, filed Jul. 6, 2016, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. The present application is also a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/834,924 for “Active Illumination for Enhanced Depth Map Generation,”, filed Aug. 25, 2015, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. The present application is also a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/451,831 for “Video Capture, Processing, Calibration, Computational Fiber Artifact Removal, and Light-field Pipeline,”, filed Mar. 7, 2017, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/451,831 claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/305,917 for “Video Capture, Processing, Calibration, Computational Fiber Artifact Removal, and Light-field Pipeline,”, filed Mar. 9, 2016, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/451,831 is also a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/098,674 for “Light Guided Image Plane Tiled Arrays with Dense Fiber Optic Bundles for Light-Field and High Resolution Image Acquisition,”, filed Apr. 14, 2016, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/098,674 claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/148,055 for “Light Guided Image Plane Tiled Arrays with Dense Fiber Optic Bundles for Light-Field and High Resolution Image Acquisition”, filed Apr. 15, 2015, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/098,674 also claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/200,804 for “Light Guided Image Plane Tiled Arrays with Dense Fiber Optic Bundles for Light-Field Display”, filed Aug. 4, 2015, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/098,674 also claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/305,917 for “Video Capture, Processing, Calibration, Computational Fiber Artifact Removal, and Light-field Pipeline”, filed Mar. 9, 2016, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. This application is further related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/774,971 for “Compensating for Variation in Microlens Position During Light-Field Image Processing,”, filed Feb. 22, 2013, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (504)
Number Name Date Kind
725567 Ives Apr 1903 A
4383170 Takagi et al. May 1983 A
4661986 Adelson Apr 1987 A
4694185 Weiss Sep 1987 A
4920419 Easterly Apr 1990 A
5076687 Adelson Dec 1991 A
5077810 D'Luna Dec 1991 A
5157465 Kronberg Oct 1992 A
5251019 Moorman et al. Oct 1993 A
5282045 Mimura et al. Jan 1994 A
5499069 Griffith Mar 1996 A
5572034 Karellas Nov 1996 A
5610390 Miyano Mar 1997 A
5748371 Cathey, Jr. et al. May 1998 A
5757423 Tanaka et al. May 1998 A
5818525 Elabd Oct 1998 A
5835267 Mason et al. Nov 1998 A
5907619 Davis May 1999 A
5949433 Klotz Sep 1999 A
5974215 Bilbro et al. Oct 1999 A
6005936 Shimizu et al. Dec 1999 A
6021241 Bilbro et al. Feb 2000 A
6023523 Cohen et al. Feb 2000 A
6028606 Kolb et al. Feb 2000 A
6034690 Gallery et al. Mar 2000 A
6061083 Aritake et al. May 2000 A
6061400 Pearlstein et al. May 2000 A
6069565 Stern et al. May 2000 A
6075889 Hamilton, Jr. et al. Jun 2000 A
6091860 Dimitri Jul 2000 A
6097394 Levoy et al. Aug 2000 A
6115556 Reddington Sep 2000 A
6137100 Fossum et al. Oct 2000 A
6169285 Pertrillo et al. Jan 2001 B1
6201899 Bergen Mar 2001 B1
6221687 Abramovich Apr 2001 B1
6320979 Melen Nov 2001 B1
6424351 Bishop et al. Jul 2002 B1
6448544 Stanton et al. Sep 2002 B1
6466207 Gortler et al. Oct 2002 B1
6476805 Shum et al. Nov 2002 B1
6479827 Hamamoto et al. Nov 2002 B1
6483535 Tamburrino et al. Nov 2002 B1
6529265 Henningsen Mar 2003 B1
6577342 Webster Jun 2003 B1
6587147 Li Jul 2003 B1
6597859 Leinhardt et al. Jul 2003 B1
6606099 Yamada Aug 2003 B2
6658168 Kim Dec 2003 B1
6674430 Kaufman et al. Jan 2004 B1
6687419 Atkin Feb 2004 B1
6768980 Meyer et al. Jul 2004 B1
6785667 Orbanes et al. Aug 2004 B2
6833865 Fuller et al. Dec 2004 B1
6842297 Dowski, Jr. et al. Jan 2005 B2
6900841 Mihara May 2005 B1
6924841 Jones Aug 2005 B2
6927922 George et al. Aug 2005 B2
7015954 Foote et al. Mar 2006 B1
7025515 Woods Apr 2006 B2
7034866 Colmenarez et al. Apr 2006 B1
7079698 Kobayashi Jul 2006 B2
7102666 Kanade et al. Sep 2006 B2
7164807 Morton Jan 2007 B2
7206022 Miller et al. Apr 2007 B2
7239345 Rogina Jul 2007 B1
7286295 Sweatt et al. Oct 2007 B1
7304670 Hussey et al. Dec 2007 B1
7329856 Ma et al. Feb 2008 B2
7336430 George Feb 2008 B2
7417670 Linzer et al. Aug 2008 B1
7469381 Ording Dec 2008 B2
7477304 Hu Jan 2009 B2
7587109 Reininger Sep 2009 B1
7620309 Georgiev Nov 2009 B2
7623726 Georgiev Nov 2009 B1
7633513 Kondo et al. Dec 2009 B2
7683951 Aotsuka Mar 2010 B2
7687757 Tseng et al. Mar 2010 B1
7723662 Levoy et al. May 2010 B2
7724952 Shum et al. May 2010 B2
7748022 Frazier Jun 2010 B1
7847825 Aoki et al. Dec 2010 B2
7936377 Friedhoff et al. May 2011 B2
7936392 Ng et al. May 2011 B2
7941634 Georgi May 2011 B2
7945653 Zuckerberg et al. May 2011 B2
7949252 Georgiev May 2011 B1
7982776 Dunki-Jacobs et al. Jul 2011 B2
8013904 Tan et al. Sep 2011 B2
8085391 Machida et al. Dec 2011 B2
8106856 Matas et al. Jan 2012 B2
8115814 Iwase et al. Feb 2012 B2
8155456 Babacan Apr 2012 B2
8155478 Vitsnudel et al. Apr 2012 B2
8189089 Georgiev et al. May 2012 B1
8228417 Georgiev et al. Jul 2012 B1
8248515 Ng et al. Aug 2012 B2
8259198 Cote et al. Sep 2012 B2
8264546 Witt Sep 2012 B2
8279325 Pitts et al. Oct 2012 B2
8289440 Knight et al. Oct 2012 B2
8290358 Georgiev Oct 2012 B1
8310554 Aggarwal et al. Nov 2012 B2
8315476 Georgiev et al. Nov 2012 B1
8345144 Georgiev et al. Jan 2013 B1
8400533 Szedo Mar 2013 B1
8400555 Georgiev et al. Mar 2013 B1
8427548 Lim et al. Apr 2013 B2
8442397 Kang et al. May 2013 B2
8446516 Pitts et al. May 2013 B2
8494304 Venable et al. Jul 2013 B2
8531581 Shroff Sep 2013 B2
8542933 Venkataraman et al. Sep 2013 B2
8559705 Ng Oct 2013 B2
8570426 Pitts et al. Oct 2013 B2
8577216 Li et al. Nov 2013 B2
8581998 Ohno Nov 2013 B2
8589374 Chaudhri Nov 2013 B2
8593564 Border et al. Nov 2013 B2
8605199 Imai Dec 2013 B2
8614764 Pitts et al. Dec 2013 B2
8619082 Ciurea et al. Dec 2013 B1
8629930 Brueckner et al. Jan 2014 B2
8665440 Kompaniets et al. Mar 2014 B1
8675073 Aagaard et al. Mar 2014 B2
8724014 Ng et al. May 2014 B2
8736710 Spielberg May 2014 B2
8736751 Yun May 2014 B2
8749620 Pitts et al. Jun 2014 B1
8750509 Renkis Jun 2014 B2
8754829 Lapstun Jun 2014 B2
8760566 Pitts et al. Jun 2014 B2
8768102 Ng et al. Jul 2014 B1
8797321 Bertolami et al. Aug 2014 B1
8811769 Pitts et al. Aug 2014 B1
8831377 Pitts et al. Sep 2014 B2
8860856 Wetsztein et al. Oct 2014 B2
8879901 Caldwell et al. Nov 2014 B2
8903232 Caldwell Dec 2014 B1
8908058 Akeley et al. Dec 2014 B2
8948545 Akeley et al. Feb 2015 B2
8953882 Lim et al. Feb 2015 B2
8971625 Pitts et al. Mar 2015 B2
8976288 Ng et al. Mar 2015 B2
8988317 Liang et al. Mar 2015 B1
8995785 Knight et al. Mar 2015 B2
8997021 Liang et al. Mar 2015 B2
9001226 Ng et al. Apr 2015 B1
9013611 Szedo Apr 2015 B1
9106914 Doser Aug 2015 B2
9172853 Pitts et al. Oct 2015 B2
9184199 Pitts et al. Nov 2015 B2
9201193 Smith Dec 2015 B1
9210391 Mills Dec 2015 B1
9214013 Venkataraman et al. Dec 2015 B2
9294662 Vondran, Jr. et al. Mar 2016 B2
9300932 Knight et al. Mar 2016 B2
9305375 Akeley Apr 2016 B2
9305956 Pittes et al. Apr 2016 B2
9386288 Akeley et al. Jul 2016 B2
9392153 Myhre et al. Jul 2016 B2
9419049 Pitts et al. Aug 2016 B2
9467607 Ng et al. Oct 2016 B2
9497380 Jannard et al. Nov 2016 B1
9607424 Ng et al. Mar 2017 B2
9628684 Liang et al. Apr 2017 B2
9635332 Carroll et al. Apr 2017 B2
9639945 Oberheu et al. May 2017 B2
9647150 Blasco Claret May 2017 B2
9681069 El-Ghoroury et al. Jun 2017 B2
9774800 El-Ghoroury et al. Sep 2017 B2
9858649 Liang et al. Jan 2018 B2
9866810 Knight et al. Jan 2018 B2
9900510 Karafin et al. Feb 2018 B1
9979909 Kuang et al. May 2018 B2
20010048968 Cox et al. Dec 2001 A1
20010053202 Mazess et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020001395 Davis et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020015048 Nister Feb 2002 A1
20020061131 Sawhney May 2002 A1
20020109783 Hayashi et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020159030 Frey et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020199106 Hayashi Dec 2002 A1
20030081145 Seaman et al. May 2003 A1
20030103670 Schoelkopf et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030117511 Belz et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030123700 Wakao Jul 2003 A1
20030133018 Ziemkowski Jul 2003 A1
20030147252 Fioravanti Aug 2003 A1
20030156077 Balogh Aug 2003 A1
20040002179 Barton et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040012688 Tinnerino et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040012689 Tinnerino et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040101166 Williams et al. May 2004 A1
20040114176 Bodin et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040135780 Nims Jul 2004 A1
20040189686 Tanguay et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040257360 Sieckmann Dec 2004 A1
20050031203 Fukuda Feb 2005 A1
20050049500 Babu et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050052543 Li et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050080602 Snyder et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050162540 Yata Jul 2005 A1
20050212918 Serra et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050276441 Debevec Dec 2005 A1
20060023066 Li et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060050170 Tanaka Mar 2006 A1
20060056040 Lan Mar 2006 A1
20060056604 Sylthe et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060072175 Oshino Apr 2006 A1
20060082879 Miyoshi et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060130017 Cohen et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060208259 Jeon Sep 2006 A1
20060248348 Wakao et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060256226 Alon et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060274210 Kim Dec 2006 A1
20060285741 Subbarao Dec 2006 A1
20070008317 Lundstrom Jan 2007 A1
20070019883 Wong et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070030357 Levien et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070033588 Landsman Feb 2007 A1
20070052810 Monroe Mar 2007 A1
20070071316 Kubo Mar 2007 A1
20070081081 Cheng Apr 2007 A1
20070097206 Houvener May 2007 A1
20070103558 Cai et al. May 2007 A1
20070113198 Robertson et al. May 2007 A1
20070140676 Nakahara Jun 2007 A1
20070188613 Norbori et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070201853 Petschnigg Aug 2007 A1
20070229653 Matusik et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070230944 Georgiev Oct 2007 A1
20070269108 Steinberg et al. Nov 2007 A1
20080007626 Wernersson Jan 2008 A1
20080012988 Baharav et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080018668 Yamauchi Jan 2008 A1
20080031537 Gutkowicz-Krusin et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080049113 Hirai Feb 2008 A1
20080056569 Williams et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080122940 Mori May 2008 A1
20080129728 Satoshi Jun 2008 A1
20080144952 Chen et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080152215 Horie et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080168404 Ording Jul 2008 A1
20080180792 Georgiev Jul 2008 A1
20080187305 Raskar et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080193026 Horie et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080205871 Utagawa Aug 2008 A1
20080226274 Spielberg Sep 2008 A1
20080232680 Berestov et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080253652 Gupta et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080260291 Alakarhu et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080266688 Errando Smet et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080277566 Utagawa Nov 2008 A1
20080309813 Watanabe Dec 2008 A1
20080316301 Givon Dec 2008 A1
20090027542 Yamamoto et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090041381 Georgiev et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090041448 Georgiev et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090070710 Kagaya Mar 2009 A1
20090128658 Hayasaka et al. May 2009 A1
20090128669 Ng et al. May 2009 A1
20090135258 Nozaki May 2009 A1
20090140131 Utagawa Jun 2009 A1
20090102956 Georgiev Jul 2009 A1
20090185051 Sano Jul 2009 A1
20090185801 Georgiev et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090190022 Ichimura Jul 2009 A1
20090190024 Hayasaka et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090195689 Hwang et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090202235 Li et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090204813 Kwan Aug 2009 A1
20090273843 Raskar et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090295829 Georgiev et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090309973 Kogane Dec 2009 A1
20090310885 Tamaru Dec 2009 A1
20090321861 Oliver et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100003024 Agrawal et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100021001 Honsinger et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100026852 Ng et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100050120 Ohazama et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100060727 Steinberg et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100097444 Lablans Apr 2010 A1
20100103311 Makii Apr 2010 A1
20100107068 Butcher et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100111489 Presler May 2010 A1
20100123784 Ding et al. May 2010 A1
20100141780 Tan et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100142839 Lakus-Becker Jun 2010 A1
20100201789 Yahagi Aug 2010 A1
20100253782 Elazary Oct 2010 A1
20100265385 Knight et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100277617 Hollinger Nov 2010 A1
20100277629 Tanaka Nov 2010 A1
20100278382 Chapman et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100303288 Malone Dec 2010 A1
20100328485 Imamura et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110018903 Lapstun et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110019056 Hirsch et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110025827 Shpunt et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110050864 Bond Mar 2011 A1
20110050909 Ellenby Mar 2011 A1
20110069175 Mistretta et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110075729 Dane et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110090255 Wilson et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110123183 Adelsberger et al. May 2011 A1
20110129120 Chan Jun 2011 A1
20110129165 Lim et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110148764 Gao Jun 2011 A1
20110149074 Lee et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110169994 DiFrancesco et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110205384 Zamowski et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110210969 Barenbrug Sep 2011 A1
20110221947 Awazu Sep 2011 A1
20110242334 Wilburn et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110242352 Hikosaka Oct 2011 A1
20110261164 Olesen et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110261205 Sun Oct 2011 A1
20110267263 Hinckley Nov 2011 A1
20110273466 Imai et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110133649 Bales et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110292258 Adler Dec 2011 A1
20110298960 Tan et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110304745 Wang et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110311046 Oka Dec 2011 A1
20110316968 Taguchi et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120014837 Fehr et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120050562 Perwass et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120056889 Carter et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120057040 Park et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120057806 Backlund et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120062755 Takahashi et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120132803 Hirato et al. May 2012 A1
20120133746 Bigioi et al. May 2012 A1
20120147205 Lelescu et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120176481 Lukk et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120188344 Imai Jul 2012 A1
20120201475 Carmel et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120206574 Shikata et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120218463 Benezra et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120224787 Imai Sep 2012 A1
20120229691 Hiasa et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120249529 Matsumoto et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120249550 Akeley Oct 2012 A1
20120249819 Imai Oct 2012 A1
20120251131 Henderson et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120257065 Velarde et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120257795 Kim et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120271115 Buerk Oct 2012 A1
20120272271 Nishizawa et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120287246 Katayama Nov 2012 A1
20120287296 Fukui Nov 2012 A1
20120287329 Yahata Nov 2012 A1
20120293075 Engelen et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120300091 Shroff et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120237222 Ng et al. Dec 2012 A9
20130002902 Ito Jan 2013 A1
20130002936 Hirama et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130010077 Nguyen Jan 2013 A1
20130021486 Richardson Jan 2013 A1
20130038696 Ding et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130041215 McDowall Feb 2013 A1
20130044290 Kawamura Feb 2013 A1
20130050546 Kano Feb 2013 A1
20130060540 Frahm Mar 2013 A1
20130064453 Nagasaka et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130064532 Caldwell et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130070059 Kushida Mar 2013 A1
20130070060 Chatterjee et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130077880 Venkataraman et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130082905 Ranieri et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130088616 Ingrassia, Jr. Apr 2013 A1
20130093844 Shuto Apr 2013 A1
20130093859 Nakamura Apr 2013 A1
20130094101 Oguchi Apr 2013 A1
20130107085 Ng et al. May 2013 A1
20130113981 Knight et al. May 2013 A1
20130120356 Georgiev et al. May 2013 A1
20130120605 Georgiev et al. May 2013 A1
20130120636 Baer May 2013 A1
20130127901 Georgiev et al. May 2013 A1
20130128052 Catrein et al. May 2013 A1
20130128081 Georgiev et al. May 2013 A1
20130128087 Georgiev et al. May 2013 A1
20130135448 Nagumo et al. May 2013 A1
20130176481 Holmes et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130188068 Said Jul 2013 A1
20130208083 Li Aug 2013 A1
20130215108 McMahon et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130215226 Chauvier et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130222656 Kaneko Aug 2013 A1
20130234935 Griffith Sep 2013 A1
20130242137 Kirkland Sep 2013 A1
20130258451 El-Ghoroury et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130262511 Kuffner et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130286236 Wankowski Oct 2013 A1
20130321574 Zhang et al. Dec 2013 A1
20130321581 El-Ghoroury Dec 2013 A1
20130321677 Cote et al. Dec 2013 A1
20130329107 Burley et al. Dec 2013 A1
20130329132 Tico et al. Dec 2013 A1
20130335596 Demandoix et al. Dec 2013 A1
20130342700 Kass Dec 2013 A1
20140002502 Han Jan 2014 A1
20140002699 Guan Jan 2014 A1
20140003719 Bai et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140013273 Ng Jan 2014 A1
20140035959 Lapstun Feb 2014 A1
20140037280 Shirakawa Feb 2014 A1
20140049663 Ng et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140049765 Zheleznyak Feb 2014 A1
20140059462 Wernersson Feb 2014 A1
20140071234 Millett Mar 2014 A1
20140085282 Luebke et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140092424 Grosz Apr 2014 A1
20140098191 Rime et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140132741 Aagaard et al. May 2014 A1
20140133749 Kuo et al. May 2014 A1
20140139538 Barber et al. May 2014 A1
20140167196 Heimgartner et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140168415 Ihlenburg Jun 2014 A1
20140176540 Tosic et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140176592 Wilburn et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140176710 Brady Jun 2014 A1
20140177905 Grefalda Jun 2014 A1
20140184885 Tanaka et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140192208 Okincha Jul 2014 A1
20140193047 Grosz Jul 2014 A1
20140195921 Grosz Jul 2014 A1
20140204111 Vaidyanathan et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140211077 Ng et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140218540 Geiss et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140218718 Mander Aug 2014 A1
20140226038 Kimura Aug 2014 A1
20140240463 Pitts et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140240578 Fishman et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140267243 Venkataraman et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140267639 Tatsuta Sep 2014 A1
20140300753 Yin Oct 2014 A1
20140313350 Keelan Oct 2014 A1
20140313375 Milnar Oct 2014 A1
20140340390 Lanman et al. Nov 2014 A1
20140347540 Kang Nov 2014 A1
20140354863 Ahn et al. Dec 2014 A1
20140368494 Sakharnykh et al. Dec 2014 A1
20140368640 Strandemar et al. Dec 2014 A1
20140375613 Spears Dec 2014 A1
20150024336 Blassnig et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150062178 Matas et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150062386 Sugawara Mar 2015 A1
20150092071 Meng et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150097985 Akeley Apr 2015 A1
20150146051 Abe et al. May 2015 A1
20150170371 Muninder et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150193937 Georgiev et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150206340 Munkberg et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150207990 Ford et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150237273 Sawadaishi Aug 2015 A1
20150104101 Bryant et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150310592 Kano Oct 2015 A1
20150312553 Ng et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150312593 Akeley et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150370011 Ishihara Dec 2015 A1
20150370012 Ishihara Dec 2015 A1
20160029017 Liang Jan 2016 A1
20160048970 Loghman Feb 2016 A1
20160142615 Liang May 2016 A1
20160155215 Suzuki Jun 2016 A1
20160165206 Huang et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160173844 Knight et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160191823 El-Ghoroury Jun 2016 A1
20160253837 Zhu et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160269620 Romanenko et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160307368 Akeley Oct 2016 A1
20160307372 Pitts et al. Oct 2016 A1
20160309065 Karafin et al. Oct 2016 A1
20160330434 Chen Nov 2016 A1
20160353026 Blonde et al. Dec 2016 A1
20160381348 Hayasaka Dec 2016 A1
20170059305 Nonn et al. Mar 2017 A1
20170061635 Oberheu et al. Mar 2017 A1
20170067832 Ferrara, Jr. et al. Mar 2017 A1
20170094906 Liang et al. Mar 2017 A1
20170134639 Pitts et al. May 2017 A1
20170139131 Karafin et al. May 2017 A1
20170237971 Pitts et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170243373 Bevensee et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170244948 Pang et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170256036 Song et al. Sep 2017 A1
20170263012 Sabater et al. Sep 2017 A1
20170302903 Ng et al. Oct 2017 A1
20170358092 Bleibel et al. Dec 2017 A1
20180012397 Carothers Jan 2018 A1
20180020204 Pang et al. Jan 2018 A1
20180033209 Akeley et al. Feb 2018 A1
20180034134 Pang et al. Feb 2018 A1
20180070066 Knight et al. Mar 2018 A1
20180070067 Knight et al. Mar 2018 A1
20180082405 Liang Mar 2018 A1
20180089903 Pang et al. Mar 2018 A1
20180097867 Pang et al. Apr 2018 A1
20180139431 Simek May 2018 A1
20180158198 Kamad Jun 2018 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (12)
Number Date Country
101226292 Jul 2008 CN
101309359 Nov 2008 CN
19624421 Jan 1997 DE
2010020100 Jan 2010 JP
2011135170 Jul 2011 JP
2003052465 Jun 2003 WO
2006039486 Apr 2006 WO
2007092545 Aug 2007 WO
2007092581 Aug 2007 WO
2011029209 Mar 2011 WO
2011030234 Mar 2011 WO
2011081187 Jul 2011 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (172)
Entry
Park, Yoonsu & Yun, Seokmin & Won, Chee & Cho, Kyungeun & Um, Kyhyun & Sim, Sungdae. (2014). Calibration between Color Camera and 3D Lidar Instruments with a Polygonal Planar Board. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland). 14. 5333-5353. 10.3390/s140305333.
Georgiev, T., et al., “Suppersolution with Plenoptic 2.0 Cameras,” Optical Society of America 2009; pp. 1-3.
Georgiev, T., et al., “Unified Frequency Domain Analysis of Lightfield Cameras” (2008).
Georgiev, T., et al., Plenoptic Camera 2.0 (2008).
Girod, B., “Mobile Visual Search”, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, Jul. 2011.
Gortler et al., “The lumigraph” SIGGRAPH 96, pp. 43-54.
Groen et al., “A Comparison of Different Focus Functions for Use in Autofocus Algorithms,” Cytometry 6:81-91, 1985.
Haeberli, Paul “A Multifocus Method for Controlling Depth of Field” GRAPHICA Obscura, 1994, pp. 1-3.
Heide, F. et al., “High-Quality Computational Imaging Through Simple Lenses,” ACM Transactions on Graphics, SIGGRAPH 2013; pp. 1-7.
Heidelberg Collaboratory for Image Processing, “Consistent Depth Estimation in a 4D Light Field,” May 2013.
Hirigoyen, F., et al., “1.1 um Backside Imager vs Frontside Image: an optics-dedicated FDTD approach”, IEEE 2009 International Image Sensor Workshop.
Huang, Fu-Chung et al., “Eyeglasses-free Display: Towards Correcting Visual Aberrations with Computational Light Field Displays,” ACM Transaction on Graphics, Aug. 2014, pp. 1-12.
Isaksen, A., et al., “Dynamically Reparameterized Light Fields,” SIGGRAPH 2000, pp. 297-306.
Ives H., “Optical properties of a Lippman lenticulated sheet,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 21, 171 (1931).
Ives, H. “Parallax Panoramagrams Made with a Large Diameter Lens”, Journal of the Optical Society of America; 1930.
Jackson et al., “Selection of a Convolution Function for Fourier Inversion Using Gridding” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, Sep. 1991, vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 473-478.
Kautz, J., et al., “Fast arbitrary BRDF shading for low-frequency lighting using spherical harmonics”, in Eurographic Rendering Workshop 2002, 291-296.
Koltun, et al., “Virtual Occluders: An Efficient Interediate PVS Representation”, Rendering Techniques 2000: Proc. 11th Eurographics Workshop Rendering, pp. 59-70, Jun. 2000.
Kopf, J., et al., Deep Photo: Model-Based Photograph Enhancement and Viewing, SIGGRAPH Asia 2008.
Lehtinen, J., et al. “Matrix radiance transfer”, in Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics, 59-64, 2003.
Lesser, Michael, “Back-Side Illumination”, 2009.
Levin, A., et al., “Image and Depth from a Conventional Camera with a Coded Aperture”, SIGGRAPH 2007, pp. 1-9.
Levoy et al.,“Light Field Rendering” SIGGRAPH 96 Proceeding, 1996. pp. 31-42.
Levoy, “Light Fields and Computational Imaging” IEEE Computer Society, Aug. 2006, pp. 46-55.
Levoy, M. “Light Field Photography and Videography,” Oct. 18, 2005.
Levoy, M. “Stanford Light Field Microscope Project,” 2008; http://graphics.stanford.edu/projects/lfmicroscope/, 4 pages.
Levoy, M., “Autofocus: Contrast Detection”, http://graphics.stanford.edu/courses/cs178/applets/autofocusPD.html, pp. 1-3, 2010.
Levoy, M., “Autofocus: Phase Detection”, http://graphics.stanford.edu/courses/cs178/applets/autofocusPD.html, pp. 1-3, 2010.
Levoy, M., et al., “Light Field Microscopy,” ACM Transactions on Graphics, vol. 25, No. 3, Proceedings SIGGRAPH 2006.
Liang, Chia-Kai, et al., “Programmable Aperture Photography: Multiplexed Light Field Acquisition”, ACM SIGGRAPH, 2008.
Lippmann, “Reversible Prints”, Communication at the French Society of Physics, Journal of Physics, 7, 4, Mar. 1908, pp. 821-825.
Lumsdaine et al., “Full Resolution Lightfield Rendering” Adobe Technical Report Jan. 2008, pp. 1-12.
Maeda, Y. et al., “A CMOS Image Sensor with Pseudorandom Pixel Placement for Clear Imaging,” 2009 International Symposium on Intelligent Signal Processing and Communication Systems, Dec. 2009.
Magnor, M. et al., “Model-Aided Coding of Multi-Viewpoint Image Data,” Proceedings IEEE Conference on Image Processing, ICIP-2000, Vancouver, Canada, Sep. 2000. https://graphics.tu-bs.de/static/people/magnor/publications/icip00.pdf.
Mallat, Stephane, “A Wavelet Tour of Signal Processing”, Academic Press 1998.
Malzbender, et al., “Polynomial Texture Maps”, Proceedings SIGGRAPH 2001.
Masselus, Vincent, et al., “Relighting with 4D Incident Light Fields”, SIGGRAPH 2003.
Meynants, G., et al., “Pixel Binning in CMOS Image Sensors,” Frontiers in Electronic Imaging Conference, 2009.
Moreno-Noguer, F. et al., “Active Refocusing of Images and Videos,” ACM Transactions on Graphics, Aug. 2007; pp. 1-9.
Munkberg, J. et al., “Layered Reconstruction for Defocus and Motion Blur” EGSR 2014, pp. 1-12.
Naemura et al., “3-D Computer Graphics based on Integral Photography” Optics Express, Feb. 12, 2001. vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 255-262.
Nakamura, J., “Image Sensors and Signal Processing for Digital Still Cameras” (Optical Science and Engineering), 2005.
National Instruments, “Anatomy of a Camera,” pp. 1-5, Sep. 6, 2006.
Nayar, Shree, et al., “Shape from Focus”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 16, No. 8, pp. 824-831, Aug. 1994.
Ng, R., et al. “Light Field Photography with a Hand-held Plenoptic Camera,” Stanford Technical Report, CSTR 2005-2, 2005.
Ng, R., et al., “All-Frequency Shadows Using Non-linear Wavelet Lighting Approximation. ACM Transactions on Graphics,” ACM Transactions on Graphics; Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2003.
Ng, R., et al., “Triple Product Wavelet Integrals for All-Frequency Relighting”, ACM Transactions on Graphics Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2004).
Ng, Yi-Ren, “Digital Light Field Photography,” Doctoral Thesis, Standford University, Jun. 2006; 203 pages.
Ng., R., “Fourier Slice Photography,” ACM Transactions on Graphics, Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2005, vol. 24, No. 3, 2005, pp. 735-744.
Nguyen, Hubert. “Practical Post-Process Depth of Field.” GPU Gems 3. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Addison-Wesley, 2008.
Marshall, Richard J., et al., “Improving Depth Estimation from a Plenoptic Camera by Patterned Illumination”, Proc. of SPIE, vol. 9528, 2015, pp. 1-6.
Tao, Michael, et al., “Depth from Combining Defocus and Correspondence Using Light-Field Cameras”, Dec. 2013.
Wikipedia—Data overlay techniques for real-time visual feed. For example, heads-up displays: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Head-up_display. Retrieved Jan. 2013.
Wikipedia—Exchangeable image file format: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exchangeable_image_file_format. Retrieved Jan. 2013.
Wikipedia—Expeed: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EXPEED. Retrieved Jan. 15, 2014.
Wikipedia—Extensible Metadata Platform: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extensible_Metadata_Platform. Retrieved Jan. 2013.
Wikipedia—Key framing for video animation: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Key_frame. Retrieved Jan. 2013.
Wikipedia—Lazy loading of image data: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lazy_loading. Retrieved Jan. 2013.
Wikipedia—Methods of Variable Bitrate Encoding: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Variable_bitrate#Methods_of_VBR_encoding Retrieved Jan. 2013.
Wikipedia—Portable Network Graphics format: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portable_Network_Graphics. Retrieved Jan. 2013.
Wikipedia—Unsharp Mask Technique: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unsharp_masking. Retrieved May 3, 2016.
Wilburn et al., “High Performance Imaging using Large Camera Arrays”, ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), vol. 24, Issue 3 (Jul. 2005), Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH 2005, pp. 765-776.
Wilburn, Bennett, et al., “High Speed Video Using a Dense Camera Array”, 2004.
Wilburn, Bennett, et al., “The Light Field Video Camera”, Proceedings of Media Processors 2002.
Williams, L. “Pyramidal Parametrics,” Computer Graphic (1983).
Winnemoller, H., et al., “Light Waving: Estimating Light Positions From Photographs Alone”, Eurographics 2005.
Wippermann, F. “Chirped Refractive Microlens Array,” Dissertation 2007.
Wuu, S., et al.,“ A Manufacturable Back-Side Illumination Technology Using Bulk Si Substrate for Advanced CMOS Image Sensors”, 2009 International Image Sensor Workshop, Bergen, Norway.
Wuu, S., et al., “BSI Technology with Bulk Si Wafer”, 2009 International Image SensorWorkshop, Bergen, Norway.
Xiao, Z. et al., “Aliasing Detection and Reduction in Plenoptic Imaging,” IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition; 2014.
Xu, Xin et al., “Robust Automatic Focus Algorithm for Low Contrast Images Using a New Contrast Measure,” Sensors 2011; 14 pages.
Zheng, C. et al., “Parallax Photography: Creating 3D Cinematic Effects from Stills”, Proceedings of Graphic Interface, 2009.
Zitnick, L. et al., “High-Quality Video View Interpolation Using a Layered Representation,” Aug. 2004; ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH 2004; vol. 23, Issue 3; pp. 600-608.
Zoberbier, M., et al., “Wafer Cameras—Novel Fabrication and Packaging Technologies”, 2009 International Image Senor Workshop, Bergen, Norway, 5 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/967,076, filed Apr. 30, 2018 listing Jiantao Kuang et al. as inventors, entitled “Automatic Lens Flare Detection and Correction for Light-Field Images”.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/666,298, filed Aug. 1, 2017 listing Yonggang Ha et al. as inventors, entitled “Focal Reducer With Controlled Optical Properties for Interchangeable Lens Light-Field Camera”.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/590,808, filed May 9, 2017 listing Alex Song et al. as inventors, entitled “Adaptive Control for Immersive Experience Delivery”.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/864,938, filed Jan. 8, 2018 listing Jon Karafin et al. as inventors, entitled “Motion Blur for Light-Field Images”.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/703,553, filed Sep. 13, 2017 listing Jon Karafin et al. as inventors, entitled “4D Camera Tracking and Optical Stabilization”.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/590,841, filed May 9, 2017 listing Kurt Akeley et al. as inventors, entitled “Vantage Generation and Interactive Playback”.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/590,951, filed May 9, 2017 listing Alex Song et al. as inventors, entitled “Wedge-Based Light-Field Video Capture”.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/944,551, filed Apr. 3, 2018 listing Zejing Wang et al. as inventors, entitled “Generating Dolly Zoom Effect Using Light Field Image Data”.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/874,723, filed Jan. 18, 2018 listing Mark Weir et al. as inventors, entitled “Multi-Camera Navigation Interface”.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/897,994, filed Feb. 15, 2018 listing Trevor Carothers et al. as inventors, entitled “Generation of Virtual Reality With 6 Degrees of Freesom From Limited Viewer Data”.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/605,037, filed May 25, 2017 listing Zejing Wang et al. as inventors, entitled “Multi-View Back-Projection to a Light-Field”.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/897,836, filed Feb. 15, 2018 listing Francois Bleibel et al. as inventors, entitled “Multi-Mew Contour Tracking”.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/897,942, filed Feb. 15, 2018 listing Francois Bleibel et al. as inventors, entitled “Multi-Mew Contour Tracking With Grabcut”.
Adelsberger, R. et al., “Spatially Adaptive Photographic Flash,” ETH Zurich, Department of Computer Science, Technical Report 612, 2008, pp. 1-12.
Adelson et al., “Single Lens Stereo with a Plenoptic Camera” IEEE Translation on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Feb. 1992. vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 99-106.
Adelson, E. H., and Bergen, J. R. 1991. The plenoptic function and the elementsof early vision. In Computational Models of Visual Processing, edited by Michael S. Landy and J. Anthony Movshon. Cambridge, Mass.: mit Press.
Adobe Systems Inc, “XMP Specification”, Sep. 2005.
Adobe, “Photoshop CS6 / in depth: Digital Negative (DNG)”, http://www.adobe.com/products/photoshop/extend.displayTab2html. Retrieved Jan. 2013.
Agarwala, A., et al., “Interactive Digital Photomontage,” ACM Transactions on Graphics, Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2004, vol. 32, No. 3, 2004.
Andreas Observatory, Spectrograph Manual: IV. Flat-Field Correction, Jul. 2006.
Apple, “Apple iPad: Photo Features on the iPad”, Retrieved Jan. 2013.
Bae, S., et al., “Defocus Magnification”, Computer Graphics Forum, vol. 26, Issue 3 (Proc. of Eurographics 2007), pp. 1-9.
Belhumeur, Peter et al., “The Bas-Relief Ambiguity”, International Journal of Computer Vision, 1997, pp. 1060-1066.
Belhumeur, Peter, et al., “The Bas-Relief Ambiguity”, International Journal of Computer Vision, 1999, pp. 33-44, revised version.
Bhat, P. et al. “Gradientshop: A Gradient-Domain Optimization Framework for Image and Video Filtering,” SIGGRAPH 2010; 14 pages.
Bolles, R., et al., “Epipolar-Plane Image Analysis: An Approach to Determining Structure from Motion”, International Journal of Computer Vision, 1, 7-55 (1987).
Bourke, Paul, “Image filtering in the Frequency Domain,” pp. 1-9, Jun. 1998.
Canon, Canon Speedlite wireless flash system, User manual for Model 550EX, Sep. 1998.
Chai, Jin-Xang et al., “Plenoptic Sampling”, ACM SIGGRAPH 2000, Annual Conference Series, 2000, pp. 307-318.
Chen, S. et al., “A CMOS Image Sensor with On-Chip Image Compression Based on Predictive Boundary Adaptation and Memoryless QTD Algorithm,” Very Large Scalee Integration (VLSI) Systems, IEEE Transactions, vol. 19, Issue 4; Apr. 2011.
Chen, W., et al., “Light Field mapping: Efficient representation and hardware rendering of surface light fields”, ACM Transactions on Graphics 21, 3, 447-456, 2002.
Cohen, Noy et al., “Enhancing the performance of the light field microscope using wavefront coding,” Optics Express, vol. 22, issue 20; 2014.
Daly, D., “Microlens Arrays” Retrieved Jan. 2013.
Debevec, et al., “A Lighting Reproduction Approach to Live-Action Compoisting” Proceedings SIGGRAPH 2002.
Debevec, P., et al., “Acquiring the reflectance field of a human face”, SIGGRAPH 2000.
Debevec, P., et al., “Recovering high dynamic radiance maps from photographs”, SIGGRAPH 1997, 369-378.
Design of the xBox menu. Retrieved Jan. 2013.
Digital Photography Review, “Sony Announce new RGBE CCD,” Jul. 2003.
Dorsey, J., et al., “Design and simulation of opera light and projection effects”, in Computer Graphics (Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 91), vol. 25, 41-50.
Dorsey, J., et al., “Interactive design of complex time dependent lighting”, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 15, 2 (Mar. 1995), 26-36.
Dowski et al., “Wavefront coding: a modern method of achieving high performance and/or low cost imaging systems” SPIE Proceedings, vol. 3779, Jul. 1999, pp. 137-145.
Dowski, Jr. “Extended Depth of Field Through Wave-Front Coding,” Applied Optics, vol. 34, No. 11, Apr. 10, 1995 pp. 1859-1866.
Duparre, J. et al., “Micro-Optical Artificial Compound Eyes,” Institute of Physics Publishing, Apr. 2006.
Eisemann, Elmar, et al., “Flash Photography Enhancement via Intrinsic Relighting”, SIGGRAPH 2004.
Fattal, Raanan, et al., “Multiscale Shape and Detail Enhancement from Multi-light Image Collections”, SIGGRAPH 2007.
Fernando, Randima, “Depth of Field—A Survey of Techniques,” GPU Gems. Boston, MA; Addison-Wesley, 2004.
Fitzpatrick, Brad, “Camlistore”, Feb. 1, 2011.
Fujifilm, Super CCD EXR Sensor by Fujifilm, brochure reference No. EB-807E, 2008.
Georgiev, T. et al., “Reducing Plenoptic Camera Artifacts,” Computer Graphics Forum, vol. 29, No. 6, pp. 1955-1968; 2010.
Georgiev, T., et al., “Spatio-Angular Resolution Tradeoff in Integral Photography,” Proceedings of Eurographics Symposium on Rendering, 2006.
Nimeroff, J., et al., “Efficient rendering of naturally illuminatied environments” in Fifth Eurographics Workshop on Rendering, 359-373, 1994.
Nokia, “City Lens”, May 2012.
Ogden, J., “Pyramid-Based Computer Graphics”, 1985.
Okano et al., “Three-dimensional video system based on integral photograohy” Optical Engineering, Jun. 1999. vol. 38, No. 6, pp. 1072-1077.
Orzan, Alexandrina, et al., “Diffusion Curves: A Vector Representation for Smooth-Shaded Images,” ACM Transactions on Graphics—Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2008; vol. 27; 2008.
Pain, B., “Back-Side Illumination Technology for SOI-CMOS Image Sensors”, 2009.
Perez, Patrick et al., “Poisson Image Editing,” ACM Transactions on Graphics—Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH 2003; vol. 22, Issue 3; Jul. 2003; pp. 313-318.
Petschnigg, George, et al., “Digial Photography with Flash and No-Flash Image Pairs”, SIGGRAPH 2004.
Primesense, “The Primesense 3D Awareness Sensor”, 2007.
Ramamoorthi, R., et al, “Frequency space environment map rendering” ACM Transactions on Graphics (SIGGRAPH 2002 proceedings) 21, 3, 517-526.
Ramamoorthi, R., et al., “An efficient representation for irradiance environment maps”, in Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2001, 497-500.
Raskar, Ramesh et al., “Glare Aware Photography: 4D Ray Sampling for Reducing Glare Effects of Camera Lenses,” ACM Transactions on Graphics—Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH, Aug. 2008; vol. 27, Issue 3; pp. 1-10.
Raskar, Ramesh et al., “Non-photorealistic Camera: Depth Edge Detection and Stylized Rendering using Multi-Flash Imaging”, SIGGRAPH 2004.
Raytrix, “Raytrix Lightfield Camera,” Raytrix GmbH, Germany 2012, pp. 1-35.
Roper Scientific, Germany “Fiber Optics,” 2012.
Scharstein, Daniel, et al., “High-Accuracy Stereo Depth Maps Using Structured Light,” CVPR'03 Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE Computer Society, pp. 195-202.
Schirmacher, H. et al., “High-Quality Interactive Lumigraph Rendering Through Warping,” May 2000, Graphics Interface 2000.
Shade, Jonathan, et al., “Layered Depth Images”, SIGGRAPH 98, pp. 1-2.
Shreiner, OpenGL Programming Guide, 7th edition, Chapter 8, 2010.
Simpleviewer, “Tiltview”, http://simpleviewer.net/tiltviewer. Retrieved Jan. 2013.
Skodras, A. et al., “The JPEG 2000 Still Image Compression Standard,” Sep. 2001, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, pp. 36-58.
Sloan, P., et al., “Precomputed radiance transfer for real-time rendering in dynamic, low-frequency lighting environments”, ACM Transactions on Graphics 21, 3, 527-536, 2002.
Snavely, Noah, et al., “Photo-tourism: Exploring Photo collections in 3D”, Acm Transactions on Graphics (SIGGRAPH Proceedings), 2006.
Sokolov, “Autostereoscopy and Integral Photography by Professor Lippmann's Method”, 1911, pp. 23-29.
Sony Corp, “Interchangeable Lens Digital Camera Handbook”, 2011.
Sony, Sony's First Curved Sensor Photo: http://www.engadget.com; Jul. 2014.
Stensvold, M., “Hybrid AF: A New Approach to Autofocus Is Emerging for both Still and Video”, Digital Photo Magazine, Nov. 13, 2012.
Story, D., “The Future of Photography”, Optics Electronics, Oct. 2008.
Sun, Jian, et al., “Stereo Matching Using Belief Propagation”, 2002.
Tagging photos on Flickr, Facebook and other online photo sharing sites (see, for example, http://support.gnip.com/customer/portal/articles/809309-flickr-geo-photos-tag-search). Retrieved Jan. 2013.
Takahashi, Keita, et al., “All in-focus View Synthesis from Under-Sampled Light Fields”, ICAT 2003, Tokyo, Japan.
Tanida et al., “Thin observation module by bound optics (TOMBO): concept and experimental verification” Applied Optics 40, 11 (Apr. 10, 2001), pp. 1806-1813.
Techcrunch, “Coolinis”, Retrieved Jan. 2013.
Teo, P., et al., “Efficient linear rendering for interactive light design”, Tech. Rep. STAN-CS-TN-97-60, 1998, Stanford University.
Teranishi, N. “Evolution of Optical Structure in Images Sensors,” Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM) 2012 IEEE International; Dec. 10-13, 2012.
Vaish et al., “Using plane + parallax for calibrating dense camera arrays”, In Proceedings CVPR 2004, pp. 2-9.
Vaish, V., et al., “Synthetic Aperture Focusing Using a Shear-Warp Factorization of the Viewing Transform,” Workshop on Advanced 3D Imaging for Safety and Security (in conjunction with CVPR 2005), 2005.
VR Playhouse, “The Surrogate,” http://www.vrplayhouse.com/the-surrogate.
Wanner, S. et al., “Globally Consistent Depth Labeling of 4D Light Fields,” IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2012.
Wanner, S. et al., “Variational Light Field Analysis for Disparity Estimation and Super-Resolution,” IEEE Transacations on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intellegence, 2013.
Wenger, et al, “Performance Relighting and Reflectance Transformation with Time-Multiplexed Illumination”, Institute for Creative Technologies, SIGGRAPH 2005.
Wetzstein, Gordon, et al., “Sensor Saturation in Fourier Multiplexed Imaging”, IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (2010).
Wikipedia—Adaptive Optics: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/adaptive_optics. Retrieved Feb. 2014.
Wikipedia—Autofocus systems and methods: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autofocus. Retrieved Jan. 2013.
Wikipedia—Bayer Filter: http:/en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bayer_filter. Retrieved Jun. 20, 2013.
Wikipedia—Color Image Pipeline: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/color_image_pipeline. Retrieved Jan. 15, 2014.
Wikipedia—Compression standard JPEG XR: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JPEG_XR. Retrieved Jan. 2013.
Wikipedia—CYGM Filter: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CYGM_filter. Retrieved Jun. 20, 2013.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20170365068 A1 Dec 2017 US
Provisional Applications (4)
Number Date Country
62359022 Jul 2016 US
62305917 Mar 2016 US
62200804 Aug 2015 US
62148055 Apr 2015 US
Continuation in Parts (3)
Number Date Country
Parent 15451831 Mar 2017 US
Child 15635894 US
Parent 15098674 Apr 2016 US
Child 15451831 US
Parent 14834924 Aug 2015 US
Child 15098674 US