The present invention relates to systems and methods for the spectral efficient transmission of signals, and more particularly, for combining transponder bandwidths for source and forward error correction encoding efficiency.
Digital Direct Broadcast Systems (DBS), such as DIRECTV®, which is provided by the assignee of the present invention, have become very successful. However, as such systems evolve, there is an increasing demand for additional bandwidth to carry an ever-increasing set of audio, video and data services.
Guard bands represent an attractive source of bandwidth that is still available. For example, in the current DIRECTV® frequency plan, a symbol rate of 20 MHz and an excess bandwidth ratio of 0.2 are used for a transponder, and a guard band of 5.16 MHz exists between adjacent transponders of the same polarization. This is a legacy configuration from earlier satellite communication standards for analog frequency modulation (FM) transmissions, wherein analog FM transmissions require a higher carrier-to-noise ratio (CNR) (on the order of 14 dB), and are therefore more susceptible to spectral re-growth effects from traveling wave tube amplifier (TWTA) non-linearity and other imperfections. Actually, the designed guard band has provided more than enough margin for analog FM transmissions to reject spread signal energy due to adjacent channel interference.
In comparison, the digital DBS signal requires a lower CNR, on the order of 7.6 dB with the prevailing quadrature phase shift keying (QPSK) modulation and concatenated forward error correction (FEC) codes with a code rate of 6/7. With the advent of turbo codes, which provide higher coding gains than conventional codes, the required CNR drops even lower, to around 5.4 dB for the same code rate. Again, other factors being equal, signals with smaller CNRs are less susceptible to noise and interference effects. Therefore, the existing guard band for the current DIRECTV® frequency plan may be reduced or even eliminated with only a small impact on communication performance. Eliminating the existing guard band would increase spectral efficiency by a factor of 21%. A throughput increase of this ratio would be achieved by increasing the symbol rate without the need to increase the code rate.
Consequently, there is a need in the art for methods and systems that allow for efficient use of a fragmented signal spectrum, such as from a plurality of non-contiguous guard bands. There is also a need in the art for methods and systems that reduce FEC code latency. The present invention satisfies these needs.
To address the requirements described above, the present invention discloses an apparatus and method for combining transponder bandwidths, comprising a wide-band virtual transponder for transmitting a single data stream using existing the frequency plan. The wide-band virtual transponder is comprised of a plurality of relatively narrow-band physical transponders. The narrow-band physical transponders each use a different portion of a signal spectrum, wherein the different portions may comprise non-contiguous portions of the signal spectrum, such as guard bands, or contiguous portions of the signal spectrum, such as a combination of legacy bands and guard bands in the signal spectrum.
A plurality of elementary streams are multiplexed to create the single data stream, wherein the single data stream is forward error correction encoded and demultiplexed into a plurality of transponder streams for transmission by the plurality of narrow-band physical transponders. Upon receipt, the transponder streams are multiplexed to recover the single data stream, wherein the recovered single data stream is forward error correction decoded and demultiplexed to recover the plurality of elementary streams.
Referring now to the drawings in which like reference numbers represent corresponding parts throughout:
In the following description of the preferred embodiment, reference is made to the accompanying drawings which form a part hereof, and in which is shown by way of illustration a specific embodiment in which the invention may be practiced. It is to be understood that other embodiments may be utilized and structural changes may be made without departing from the scope of the present invention.
The present invention combines transponder bandwidths using a wide-band “virtual” transponder comprised of a plurality of narrow-band physical transponders for transmitting a single data stream. A plurality of elementary streams are statistically multiplexed for compression to create the single data stream. The single data stream is forward error correction encoded for channel impairment correction. Thereafter, the single encoded data stream is demultiplexed into a plurality of transponder streams, and each transponder stream is modulated and transmitted to the plurality of narrow-band physical transponders. The narrow-band physical transponders, in turn, re-transmit the plurality of transponder streams. Upon receipt from the plurality of narrow-band physical transponders, the transponder streams are demodulated and multiplexed to recover the single data stream. The recovered single data stream is forward error correction decoded and demultiplexed to recover the plurality of elementary streams.
Using this technique, the present invention allows for the efficient use of a signal spectrum represented by the transmissions from each transponder. Specifically, the narrow-band physical transponders each use a different portion of a signal spectrum, wherein the different portions may comprise non-contiguous portions of the signal spectrum, such as guard bands, or the different portions may comprise a combination of legacy bands and guard bands in the signal spectrum. Without this technique, the limited throughput of a typical narrow bandwidth might not support the many channels that are required for efficient statistical multiplexing.
The present invention also reduces FEC code latency. The time duration of an FEC code for a lone signal provided by the guard band is quite long, due to the small symbol rate a narrow-band signal can support. By “pooling” the bandwidths of multiple narrow-band signals for the FEC code, the effective symbol rate is increased, resulting in a significant reduction in code length and therefore code latency. This can be important since more powerful and longer turbo codes are increasingly used in quasi-error free communication.
The uplink center 104 receives the broadcast materials from the control center 102 and, using an antenna 112 and transmitter 114, transmits the broadcast materials via uplink 116 to one or more satellites 118, each of which may include one or more transponders 120. The satellites 118 receive and process the broadcast materials, and re-transmit the broadcast materials to receiving stations 108 via a downlink 122 using transponders 120. Receiving stations 108 receive the broadcast materials from the satellites 118 via an antenna 124, and decrypt and decode the broadcast materials using a receiver 126.
There are a number of advantages to the present invention. One advantage is that the present invention allows efficient use of a fragmented signal spectrum, such as from non-contiguous guard bands. Consider the example shown in
Another advantage is that the present invention allows narrow-band transponders 120 to simultaneously achieve high CNR and statistical-multiplexing efficiencies. Consider the example shown in
Yet another advantage is that the present invention reduces FEC code latency. The combined bandwidth provided by the present invention increases the effective symbol rate, thereby resulting in a shortened time duration of a given FEC.
The communications system described herein is assumed to operate with a constant-envelope signal on all transponders 120. Typically, a single-carrier QPSK or 8PSK signal is used to maximize TWTA power efficiency. Either single-channel or multiple-channel receivers 126 may be used with the present invention.
In a single-channel receiver 126 design, a single tuner with a fast, single-set, analog-to-digital (A/D) converter covers several transponder 120 signals that comprise a part or all of the virtual transponder 212. For example, if two guard bands 400 on either side of a legacy signal band 402 in
Alternatively, a multiple channel receiver 126 design may include a tuner and A/D converter for each physical transponder 120. Compared with a single-tuner receiver 126, the tuners and A/Ds in this embodiment are replicated in the receiver 126, but the A/Ds can be slower, as they only need to cover a narrow-band signal from one of the transponders 120.
In conclusion, the present invention allows efficient use of a signal spectrum, such as non-contiguous guard bands or a combination of legacy bands and guard bands, and allows narrow-band transponders to achieve high CNR and statistical-multiplexing efficiencies at the same time. In addition, the present invention works with any modulation or FEC schemes. Moreover, the present invention requires only a moderate increase in system and receiver complexity.
The foregoing description of the preferred embodiment of the invention has been presented for the purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise form disclosed. Many modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teaching.
It is intended that the scope of the invention be limited not by this detailed description, but rather by the claims appended hereto. The above specification, examples and data provide a complete description of the manufacture and use of the apparatus and method of the invention. Since many embodiments of the invention can be made without departing from the scope of the invention, the invention resides in the claims hereinafter appended.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3812430 | Schmidt | May 1974 | A |
4228401 | Wachs | Oct 1980 | A |
4586177 | Kaul | Apr 1986 | A |
4660196 | Gray et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4706239 | Ito et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
5195092 | Wilson et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5216503 | Paik et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5319707 | Wasilewski et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5455826 | Ozveren et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5459720 | Iliev et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5537435 | Carney et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5555257 | Dent | Sep 1996 | A |
5648958 | Counterman | Jul 1997 | A |
5691986 | Pearlstein | Nov 1997 | A |
5818887 | Sexton et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5835857 | Otten | Nov 1998 | A |
5861919 | Perkins et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5878037 | Sherman | Mar 1999 | A |
5956088 | Shen et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5974316 | Tayloe et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6091455 | Yang | Jul 2000 | A |
6108561 | Mallinckrodt | Aug 2000 | A |
6181711 | Zhang et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6188436 | Williams et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6212233 | Alexandre et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6215821 | Chen | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6240072 | Lo et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6256290 | Ramesh | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6351500 | Kumar | Feb 2002 | B2 |
6356539 | Zuliani et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6377561 | Black et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6384773 | Martin | May 2002 | B1 |
6539050 | Lee et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6697364 | Kekki et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6771671 | Fields | Aug 2004 | B1 |
7058086 | Marko | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7613233 | Hottinen | Nov 2009 | B2 |
8200149 | Chen | Jun 2012 | B1 |
20010001611 | Yuzawa | May 2001 | A1 |
20030054761 | Karabinis | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030217362 | Summers et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030224731 | Yamaura et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030236068 | Jespersen | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040008617 | Dabak | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20050010960 | Kitazawa et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20060233280 | Tynderfeldt | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20080305736 | Millbrandt et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090074051 | Manapragada et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20140070865 | Fortier et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0033149 | Aug 1981 | EP |
2008113033 | Sep 2008 | WO |
2008113033 | Sep 2008 | WO |
20080113033 | Sep 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Non-final Office action dated Sep. 18, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/600,883, filed Aug. 31, 2012 by Paul R. Anderson et al. |
Non-final Office action dated Nov. 12, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/829,916, filed Mar. 14, 2013 by Romulo Pontual et al. |
Final Rejection dated Jan. 23, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/600,883, filed Aug. 31, 2012 by Paul R. Anderson et al. |
Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 3, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/600,883, filed Aug. 31, 2012 by Paul R. Anderson et al. |
Chalasani, Suresh; Varma, Anujan; “Efficient Time-Slot Assignment Algorithms for SS/TDMA Systems with Variable-Bandwidth Beams”; Networking in the Nineties; Bal Harbour, Florida; Apr. 7-11, 1991; [Proceedings of the Annual Joint Conference of the Computer and Communications Societies (INFOCOM)]; New York, New York; IEEE, US; vol. Conference 10; Apr. 7, 1991; pp. 658-667; XP010042453; DOI: 10.1109/INFCOM.1991.147568; ISBN: 978-0-87942-694-1; p. 648, paragraph 2—p. 659, paragraph 2, figure 2. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 28, 2014 in International Application No. PCT/US2014/084659 failed, Mar. 12, 2014 by Romulo Pontual et al. |
Final Rejection dated Aug. 20, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/829,916, filed Mar. 14, 2013 by Romulo Pontual et al. |
Non-final Office action dated Dec. 31, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/829,916, filed Mar. 14, 2013 by Romulo Pontual et al. |
Final Rejection dated May 6, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/484,756, filed May 31, 2012 by Ernest C. Chen. |
Sibley, M., “New Details on Comcast Upstream Channel Bonding”; Zatz Not Funny!, Jun. 16, 2011; retrieved from the Internet on May 18, 2012. http://www/zatznotfunny.com/2011-06. |
Snyder, G. F ., Jr., “Comcast Deploying Upstream Channel Bonding”; Gordon's Information and Communications Technologies (ICT) Blog; Jun. 14, 2011; retrieved from the Internet on May 18, 2012. http://www.gordostuff.com/2011/06/comcast-deploying-upstream-channel.html. |
Final Office Action dated May 2, 2017 in Colombian Patent Application No. 15-243-920 (translation-only). |
Final Office Action dated May 2, 2017 in Colombian Patent Application No. 15-243-920 (translation-only attached.). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11193856 | Jul 2005 | US |
Child | 13484756 | US |