The subject invention relates to a combline filter.
Some electronic circuits, such as Frequency doublers and sub-harmonic VCOs, may generate unwanted frequency harmonics at half integers of the fundamental frequency. These spurious outputs are called sub-harmonics of the fundamental frequency. These unwanted signals are usually filtered with fixed mechanical or electrical circuits and brought down to acceptable levels. Such filtering preferably passes the fundamental frequency (Freq) with slight loss and good return loss while suppressing frequencies at Freq/2 and 3*Freq/2 and higher. If the particular circuit of interest has an operating range that spans near an octave of frequencies, the required filter becomes complex and might need to be tunable. Furthermore, electrical systems that span an octave will generally have amplitude response that falls off with frequency. For such systems a tunable filter that not only rejects frequencies at sub-harmonics but also compensates for the amplitude roll-off is desirable.
U.S. Pat. No. 3,889,214 discloses a tunable stripline combline filter that utilizes discrete manufacturing processes. U.S. Pat. No. 4,835,499 discloses a microstrip combline discrete circuit having less biasing circuitry. These filters are large, expensive, limited in upper frequency range and their resonators would need additional tuning in order to match them to each other due to their inherent mismatch. Also these filters have limited linearity performance.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,525,630 discloses microstrip tunable filters deposited onto a substrate. The filters of the '630 patent, although promising low loss and high Q, are rather expensive, have repeatability challenges, require high operating control voltages and need high isolation on the control lines. The filters also need to employ a pseudo-combline approach, where the microstrip ends opposite of the varactor cannot be grounded, but rather have to be extended in length and left open for DC isolation reasons.
There are applications in which it is desirable to have a bandpass filter which is more selective than the filters described above, and which may also have a tunable response that can reject other interfering signals close to the wanted signal. Examples of such applications are up-conversion mixers where variable LO frequencies may be used and wide band receiver front-ends having interfering frequencies.
This invention results from the realization that a microstrip combline bandpass filter having excellent suppression of sub-harmonic frequencies, a low return loss, and insertion loss having an amplitude equalization feature can be effected by a plurality of resonators each including a microstrip line, and a plurality of pairs of series coupled varactors, with a first end of each microstrip line coupled to one of the pairs of varactors, and a second end of each microstrip line coupled to ground.
In one embodiment, this invention features a microstrip combline bandpass filter including an input port, an output port, and a plurality of resonators each including a microstrip line having a first end and a second end. One of the plurality of resonators is connected to the input port, and another of the plurality of resonators is connected to the output port. The filter also includes a plurality of pairs of varactors, each pair serially coupled. The first end of each microstrip line is coupled to one of the pairs of varactors, and the second end of each microstrip line is coupled to ground.
In a preferred embodiment, the filter which includes pairs of varactors may each be coupled between the first end of the corresponding microstrip line and ground. The filter may include a plurality of resistances, in which the second end of each microstrip line is coupled to ground through one of the resistances to provide the filter with greater amplitude response slope as a function of frequency. The each pair of varactors may include two diodes coupled together in an anode to anode or cathode to cathode configuration. A tuning circuit may be coupled to a junction between each pair of varactors for adjusting the center frequency of the filter. The tuning circuit includes a tuning control terminal and a plurality of inductances and resistances, one of the inductances and one of the resistances each coupled in series between the tuning control terminal and a junction between each pair of varactors.
The filter may include at least one variable capacitor coupled between the input port and the output port for providing bandreject notch. The least one variable capacitor may include two varactors coupled in series between the input port and the output port. The least one variable capacitor may include two pairs of series coupled varactors coupled in series between the input port and the output port. The filter may include a bandreject notch control circuit coupled to a junction between each pair of varactors for adjusting the frequency of the bandreject notch.
The filter may be implemented on a Monolithic Microwave Integrated Circuit (MMIC) die. A low pass filter may be also implemented on the Monolithic Microwave Integrated Circuit (MMIC) die. The low pass filter may be tunable. The filter may be implemented on a planar monolithic substrate. The monolithic substrate may be selected from the group of GaAs or SiGe. The monolithic substrate may be mounted in a surface-mount package. Each varactor may include a p-n junction, a field effect transistor (FET) and uses a capacitance between a gate and a source of the FET, a ferroelectric based capacitor, and/or a MEMS-based capacitor.
In another embodiment, this invention features a microstrip combline bandpass filter, including: an input port; an output port; a plurality of resonators each including a microstrip line having a first and second ends, the second end coupled to ground through a corresponding resistance, one of the plurality of resonators connected to the input port, another of the plurality of resonators connected to the output port; and a plurality of pairs of electrically tunable varactors, the varactors of each pair serially coupled and coupled between the first end of a corresponding microstrip line and ground.
In a preferred embodiment, the filter may further including a tuning circuit coupled to a junction between each pair of varactors for adjusting the center frequency of the filter. The tuning circuit may include a tuning control terminal and a plurality of inductances and resistances, one of the inductances and one of the resistances each coupled in series between the tuning control terminal and a junction between each pair of varactors.
Other objects, features and advantages will occur to those skilled in the art from the following description of a preferred embodiment and the accompanying drawings, in which:
Aside from the preferred embodiment or embodiments disclosed below, this invention is capable of other embodiments and of being practiced or being carried out in various ways. Thus, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited in its application to the details of construction and the arrangements of components set forth in the following description or illustrated in the drawings. If only one embodiment is described herein, the invention is not to be limited to that embodiment.
There is shown in
A tuning circuit 24 is coupled to a corresponding junction 26a-e between each pair of varactors 20a-e for adjusting the center frequency of the filter. Tuning circuit 24 includes a tuning control terminal 28 and a plurality of inductances 30a-e and resistors 32a-e, with one of the inductances and one of the resistances each coupled in series between the tuning control terminal 28 and the corresponding junction 26a-e between each pair of varactors 20a-e.
By incorporating pairs of varactors 20a-e in filter 10a, the distortion created when large signal levels are applied is improved substantially by eliminating the non-symmetrical variation of capacitance under ac excitation around a given dc operating point. The pairs of varactors 20a-e may include back to back varactor diodes, configured either cathode to cathode or anode to anode, but other elements may be used for the varactors. For example, each of the varactors may include a pn junction. Each of the varactors may include a field effect transistor (FET) and use the capacitance between the gate and the source of the FET. Each variable capacitor may include a ferroelectric based capacitor. Also, each variable capacitor may include a MEMS-based capacitor.
In another embodiment, combline bandpass filter 10a,
Plots 40 and 50,
To obtain an asymmetrical response, in another embodiment combline bandpass filter 10b,
The configuration of combline bandpass filter 10b achieves a notch response and reduces complexity in comparison to prior filters that use additional elements to create non-adjacent resonator coupling. Also, the circuit of filter 10b is more compact and easier to layout since it includes four resonators 16a″-16d″. Asymmetrical response is obtained by using varactors, such as the pairs of varactors 80 and 82, to couple some of the energy from the input and output and to channelize this energy through a microstrip/stripline that can be on a different layer than the main resonator lines or on the same plane but to the side. Varactors may be placed in a back to back configuration for increased linearity, and may include diode varactors or include different elements as described above.
Plot 100,
To increase the rejection of higher frequencies, combline bandpass filter 10c,
Plot 130,
The layout 140,
Combline bandpass filters 10a-d may be constructed in stripline form with two dielectrics attached on top of each other, and backside vias connecting the two ground planes together for improved performance.
Coupling in and out can be tapped as in the preferred version or electrically coupled through parallel adjacent electrical lines.
Embodiments of combline bandpass filter 10a-d typically provide 40 dB suppression at sub-harmonic frequencies, better than 10 dB return loss, and insertion loss that has an amplitude equalization feature. The equalization effect is due to the low reactance value of resonators 16a-e (preferred for wide tuning bandwidth) and the relatively high resistive components in the circuit such as the resistance of the coupled microstrip lines and the resistance of the varactors. As the filter is tuned higher in frequency and the reactance of the resonators increases while the overall resistance of the components stays relatively constant or decreases, the insertion loss of the circuit improves and amplitude equalization is achieved.
Although specific features of the invention are shown in some drawings and not in others, this is for convenience only as each feature may be combined with any or all of the other features in accordance with the invention. The words “including”, “comprising”, “having”, and “with” as used herein are to be interpreted broadly and comprehensively and are not limited to any physical interconnection. Moreover, any embodiments disclosed in the subject application are not to be taken as the only possible embodiments.
In addition, any amendment presented during the prosecution of the patent application for this patent is not a disclaimer of any claim element presented in the application as filed: those skilled in the art cannot reasonably be expected to draft a claim that would literally encompass all possible equivalents, many equivalents will be unforeseeable at the time of the amendment and are beyond a fair interpretation of what is to be surrendered (if anything), the rationale underlying the amendment may bear no more than a tangential relation to many equivalents, and/or there are many other reasons the applicant can not be expected to describe certain insubstantial substitutes for any claim element amended.
Other embodiments will occur to those skilled in the art and are within the following claims.
This application hereby claims the benefit of and priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/395,396, filed on May 12, 2010 under 35 U.S.C. §§119, 120, 363, 365, and 37 C.F.R. §1.55 and §1.78, which application is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3889214 | Petitjean et al. | Jun 1975 | A |
4835499 | Pickett | May 1989 | A |
5908811 | Das | Jun 1999 | A |
6018282 | Tsuda | Jan 2000 | A |
6437965 | Adkins et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6525630 | Zhu et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
7305223 | Liu et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7548136 | Shah | Jun 2009 | B1 |
20080290465 | de Vreede | Nov 2008 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
David M. Alter, “Using PWM Output as a Digital-to-Analog Converter on a TMS320C240 DSP”, Nov. 1998, Texas Instruments, p. 11. |
Kim et al., “Varactor-Tuned Combline Bandpass Filter Using Step-Impedance Microstrip Lines” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 52, No. 4, Apr. 1, 2004, pp. 1279-1283. |
Chandler, S.R. et al., “Active Varactor Tunable Bandpass Filter”, IEEE Microwave and Guided Wave Letters, vol. 3, No. 3, Mar. 1, 1993, pp. 70-71. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110279176 A1 | Nov 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61395396 | May 2010 | US |