Patent Application
20150060189
[Not Applicable]
[Not Applicable]
The present invention relates to an eartip that conforms to the various shapes of human ear canals and provides an acoustic and pressure seal to the ear canal. More specifically, the present invention provides an eartip that seals to ear canals quicker, easier, and more comfortably than existing eartips. The conformable eartip provides a low coefficient of friction so that the eartip inserts into the ear canal without discomfort and allows for direct insertion into the ear canal without requiring preparatory compression of the foam. The conformable eartip creates a minimal amount of pressure against the ear canal when inserted, has the ability to significantly distort its shape to easily conform to non-circular ear canal shapes, conforms to bends in an ear canal, and provides a seal at varying depths within an ear canal.
There are three common categories of commercially available eartips, compressible foam, elastomeric, and custom earmolds. Compressible foam tips are nominally round foam cylinders that seal to the ear canal through compressibility of the foam. Compressible foam eartips are generally pre-formed by compressing the foam to reduce the outer diameter, allowing the tip to enter the ear canal before recovery of the foam to its relaxed diameter. As the foam expands in the ear canal it seals against the surface of the ear canal walls. Compressible foam eartips are often made of slow-recovery foam allowing for time between manually pre-compressing the foam and inserting it into the ear canal. A disadvantage of compressible foam eartips is that the eartips typically require the user to compress the foam prior to insertion into the ear canal.
Another common problem with compressible foam eartips is that the expansion of the foam in the ear canal can cause significant pressure against the ear canal wall. The excessive pressure against the ear canal wall may cause discomfort for a user of the eartip. Additionally, many existing compressible foam eartips do not conform to bends in an ear canal when attached to a sound tube of a hearing device. The inability of compressible foam eartips to conform to bends in an ear canal may prevent the eartips from providing a seal, particularly at deeper insertion depths. At shorter insertion depths, compressible foam eartips can be ineffective for excluding noise and can increase the amount of occlusion effect a user experiences when talking. A further disadvantage of existing compressible foam eartips is that a greater diameter of foam is typically needed to completely seal non-circular ear canals because the foam does not appreciably expand outward during recovery to its relaxed diameter.
Elastomer eartips are nominally round forms that are generally directly inserted into the ear canal without pre-compression. A common problem with elastomer eartips is that friction between the eartip and the ear canal wall can make the insertion of the eartip more difficult and less comfortable. A lubricant applied to the eartip can provide a reduction of friction but is seldom used because it can be messy and/or inconvenient. Additionally, existing elastomer eartips do not easily conform to the ear canal, which may cause significant pressure against the ear canal wall. The excessive pressure against the ear canal wall can cause discomfort for the user of the eartip.
Another disadvantage of existing elastomer eartips is that the eartips have difficulty sealing to the varying shapes of human ear canals. For example, many elastomer eartips may crease inward when inserted in non-circular ear canals thereby preventing a seal from forming between the eartip and the ear canal. Many existing elastomer eartips include thick and/or otherwise large core sections that inhibit the eartips ability to conform to bends in an ear canal. The inability of existing elastomer eartips to conform to bends in an ear canal may prevent a seal from forming between the eartips and the ear canal and/or can cause discomfort to a wearer because the ear canals may be forced to conform to the eartips. Also, elastomer eartips typically require deep insertion due to the nominal size of the eartips relative to the ear canal and the lack of conformability of the eartips. The ability to achieve a seal without deep insertion to the ear canal is particularly beneficial when the user is uncomfortable with inserting eartips into their ear canal, or for those where a deeper insertion is in itself uncomfortable.
Some elastomer eartips provide multiple sealing surfaces in incrementally increasing diameters, intended to allow the eartip to seal to a larger range of eartip diameters. Although multi-flange elastomer eartips may seal to a large variety of ear canal sizes, a significantly deeper insertion is typically needed for larger size ear canals and the insertion depth with smaller size ear canals may be limited. Another disadvantage of the multi-flange elastomer eartip style is a longer minimum length to accommodate the multiple sealing surfaces.
Custom earmolds are derived from a measurement or mold of the individual ear canal and are typically produced using silicone materials. Custom earmolds properly fit only the ear canal for which it was made, sealing to the ear canal by mating exactly with the ear canal shape. A common problem with custom earmolds is that friction between the material and the ear canal wall can make the insertion of the eartip more difficult and less comfortable. A lubricant applied to the eartip can provide a reduction of friction but is seldom used because it can be messy and/or inconvenient. Other problems with existing custom earmolds include the high cost of custom earmolds, the additional time needed for fitting and manufacturing the custom earmolds, and the inability to vary the insertion depth of the custom earmolds.
Further limitations and disadvantages of conventional and traditional approaches will become apparent to one of skill in the art, through comparison of such systems with some aspects of the present invention as set forth in the remainder of the present application.
Certain embodiments of the present technology provide conformable eartips, substantially as shown in and/or described in connection with at least one of the figures.
These and other advantages, aspects and novel features of the present invention, as well as details of an illustrated embodiment thereof, will be more fully understood from the following description and drawings.
The foregoing summary, as well as the following detailed description of embodiments of the present invention, will be better understood when read in conjunction with the appended drawings. For the purpose of illustrating the invention, certain embodiments are shown in the drawings. It should be understood, however, that the present invention is not limited to the arrangements and instrumentality shown in the attached drawings.
Embodiments of the present technology provide an eartip that conforms to the various shapes of human ear canals and provides an acoustic and pressure seal to the ear canal. The conformable eartip provides a low coefficient of friction so that the eartip inserts into the ear canal without discomfort and allows for direct insertion into the ear canal without requiring preparatory compression of the foam. The conformable eartip creates a minimal amount of pressure against the ear canal when inserted, has the ability to significantly distort its shape to easily conform to non-circular ear canal shapes, conforms to bends in an ear canal, and provides a seal at varying depths within an ear canal.
Various embodiments provide a conformable eartip 100 comprising a round flange 110 and a core 120. The round flange comprises a sealing surface 115 for mating with walls of an ear canal. The round flange 110 extends from an insertion end 101 to an opposite end 102 of the conformable eartip 100. The sealing surface 115 is tapered from the opposite end 102 toward the insertion end 101 of the conformable eartip 100. The core 120 is joined to the round flange 110 at the insertion end 101 of the conformable eartip 100. In various embodiments, the core 120 may extend from the insertion end 101 to a base 125 of the core 120 toward the opposite end 102 of the conformable eartip 100. The amount of extension of the core 120 can vary in certain embodiments, as illustrated in
Referring to
The flange 110 can be generally round and may provide a sealing surface 115 for mating with walls of an ear canal. The rounded shape of the flange 110 can reduce the tendency of the flange 110 to crease inward, causing leakage, for example. The flange 110 can be formed by hollowing out a section 140 between the flange 110 and the core 120 to allow the flange 110 to freely compress and elongate for conforming to an ear canal of a wearer. The flange 110 can extend a distance from an insertion end of the eartip 100 and may be tapered at an angle for ease of insertion as discussed in more detail below, for example. In various embodiments, the thickness of the flange may be as much as 30% of the outer diameter of the eartip or thinner, for example. The thin flange wall increases the range of conformance of the eartip 100 and allows the eartip 100 to conform and seal to the ear canal without applying a significant pressure against the ear canal wall, providing a more comfortable fit. The thin flange wall in conjunction with the length of extension of the flange 110 from the core 120 (e.g., the hollowed-out section 140) enables the eartip 100 to compress and extend more completely than existing eartips. In various embodiments, the flange wall can have a substantially uniform thickness.
The core 120 may be generally round and can comprise a channel 130 extending through the core 120 from an insertion end 101 of the eartip 100 to a base 125 of the core 120. In various embodiments, the channel 130 of the core 120 can receive a tube or stem 200, as illustrated in
The ability of an eartip 100 to seal to an ear canal can be determined based on the ability of the eartip 100 to elongate the sealing surface of the flange 110 to meet the profile of a typically elliptical ear canal. The elongation may be determined by a ratio of the maximum width of the sealing surface 115 of the flange 110 at full compression (Z1) with the maximum nominal outer diameter (D2) of the sealing surface 115 of the flange 110. In other words, the elongation ratio, E, equals Z1/D2. The conformable eartip 100 provides a hollowed out section 140 between the flange 110 and the core 120 that allows the eartip 100 to freely elongate from its relaxed state. In various embodiments, the conformable eartip 100 provides an elongation ratio, E, of 1.4 or greater. The elongation ratio, E, of existing available eartips measured ranged from 1.0 to 1.2.
Referring to
Certain embodiments provide that an eartip 100 can seal to an ear canal of a wearer where the outer diameter, in either a nominal profile (D2) or distorted to match the profile of the ear canal, is of sufficient size to at least match the diameter or effective diameter of the ear canal. The maximum outer diameter of the eartip sealing surface is, in common practice, not directly at the insertion end 101 of the eartip 100 but at some distance (D3) behind the insertion end 101 of the eartip 100. In various embodiments, the distance (D3) can define a minimum insertion depth for sealing the eartip 100 in the ear canal, where shorter minimum insertions depths may provide a more versatile eartip. In certain embodiments, the distance (D3) may not be less than the maximum eartip diameter (D2) minus the minimum eartip diameter (D1) over the effective taper angle (A1) of the eartip 100.
Referring to
Regarding pre-insertion activity, when additional steps are needed prior to inserting an eartip into an ear canal of a wearer, the additional steps can make the insertion process generally more difficult and/or complicated. For example, aligning an eartip to a particular orientation, adding lubricant to an eartip, and/or pre-forming the eartip by compressing the foam to reduce the outer diameter is generally more difficult and/or complicated than inserting an eartip without pre-insertion activity. Various embodiments provide that the eartip 100 is inserted into an ear canal of a wearer without performing pre-insertion activity.
The taper angle (A1) of the sealing surface of the flange 110 defines a shape of the eartip 100 that impacts the ease of insertion of the eartip 100 into an ear canal of a wearer. The taper angle (A1) of the sealing surface of the flange 110 can be determined by the following formula:
where D3 is the distance between the insertion end 101 of the eartip 100 and an opposite end 102 of the flange 110 (as illustrated in
The conformable eartip 100 illustrated in
In a representative embodiment, a conformable eartip 100 is provided that comprises a round flange 110 and a core 120. The round flange includes a sealing surface 115 for mating with walls of an ear canal. The round flange 110 extends from an insertion end 101 to an opposite end 102 of the conformable eartip 100. The sealing surface 115 is tapered from the opposite end 102 toward the insertion end 101 of the conformable eartip 100. The core 120 is joined to the round flange 110 at the insertion end 101 of the conformable eartip 100. The core 120 extends from the insertion end 101 to a base 125 of the core 120 toward the opposite end 102 of the conformable eartip 100. The core 120 includes a channel 125 extending through the core 120 from the insertion end 101 of the conformable eartip 100 to the base 125 of the core 120. In various embodiments, the conformable eartip 100 provides an elongation ratio, E, of at least 1.4 and/or a compression ratio, C, of at least 2.0.
While particular elements, embodiments and applications of the present invention have been shown and described, it will be understood that the invention is not limited thereto since modifications can be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the scope of the present disclosure, particularly in light of the foregoing teachings.
The present application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) to provisional application Ser. No. 61/873,690, filed on Sep. 4, 2013. The above referenced provisional application is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61873690 | Sep 2013 | US |
