Claims
- 1. A high heel shoe having a fixed heel height .alpha. of at least one inch, a heel seat topping said heel, an arch support extending forward from the heel seat and having a first portion which supports the head of the navicular of the wearer in approximately the same plane (relative to the ground plane) as the wearer's heel bones, a shank extending downwardly and forwardly from the first portion of the arch support, and a toe support region which extends at an inclination upwardly and forwardly from the shank whereby to buttress the phalanges of the wearer to prevent forward sliding of the foot of the wearer relative to the shoe, wherein the heel seat is situated clockwise relative to the shank at an angle "H" which is relative to the ground plane in accordance with the following formula:
- H=5.degree.+(.alpha..times.1.25.degree.)
- wherein .alpha.=the heel height in nearest 1/2 inch segments in excess of 1", and the shank is inclined at an angle M perpendicular to the ground plane in accordance with the following formula:
- M=18.degree.+(.alpha..times.3.25.degree.)
- wherein .alpha.=the heel height in nearest 1/2 inch segments in excess of 1".
- 2. A high heel shoe according to claim 1, wherein the heel seat is inclined with respect to the ground plane at an angle of approximately 3.degree. plus/minus 1.degree..
- 3. A high heel shoe according to claim 1, wherein said shank is inclined relative to the ground plane at an angle of approximately 3.degree. plus/minus 3.degree..
- 4. A high heel shoe according to claim 1, wherein the toe region of the shoe is inclined at an angle of approximately 2.degree.-3.degree. plus/minus 1.degree. with respect to the ground plane.
- 5. A high heel shoe according to claim 1, wherein said heel height .alpha. is approximately 1", said heel seat inclination H is 5.degree.-6.degree., said metatarsal angle M is 18.degree.-22.degree. and said toe angle T is 1.degree.-2.degree..
- 6. A high heel shoe according to claim 1, wherein said heel height .alpha. is approximately 11/2", said heel seat inclination H is 6.degree.-7.degree., said metatarsal angle M is 20.degree.-23.degree. and said toe angle T is 2.degree.-3.degree..
- 7. A high heel shoe according to claim 1, wherein said heel height .alpha. is approximately 2", said heel seat inclination H is 7.degree.-8.degree., said metatarsal angle M is 24.degree.-28.degree. and said toe angle T is 2.degree.-3.degree..
- 8. A high heel shoe according to claim 1, wherein said heel height .alpha. is approximately 21/2", said heel seat inclination H is 8.degree.-9.degree., said metatarsal angle M is 30.degree.-33.degree. and said toe angle T is 2.degree.-3.degree..
- 9. A high heel shoe according to claim 1, wherein said heel height .alpha. is approximately 3", said heel seat inclination H is 9.degree.-10.degree., said metatarsal angle M is 33.degree.-36.degree. and said toe angle T is 3.degree.-4.degree..
Parent Case Info
This is a continuation-in-part of my application Ser. No. 08/303,872, filed Sep. 9, 1994 (now abandoned), which is, in turn, a File Wrapper Continuation of application Ser. No. 08/060,700 filed May 12, 1993 (now abandoned) which is a File Wrapper Continuation of application Ser. No. 07/794,817 filed Nov. 18, 1991 (now abandoned), which is a File Wrapper Continuation of application Ser. No. 07/559,518 filed Jul. 23, 1990 (now abandoned), which is a File Wrapper Continuation of application Ser. No. 07/300,480 filed Jan. 23, 1989 (now abandoned) which is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 07/146,338 filed Jan. 21, 1988 (now abandoned).
US Referenced Citations (3)
Continuations (4)
|
Number |
Date |
Country |
Parent |
60700 |
May 1993 |
|
Parent |
794817 |
Nov 1991 |
|
Parent |
559518 |
Jul 1990 |
|
Parent |
300480 |
Jan 1989 |
|
Continuation in Parts (2)
|
Number |
Date |
Country |
Parent |
303872 |
Sep 1994 |
|
Parent |
146338 |
Jan 1988 |
|