Embodiments of the present invention relate to semiconductor devices, and more particularly to interfacing semiconductor devices with system-level interconnect structures.
Today's semiconductor devices feature ever-increasing processing capabilities in smaller packages, and continue to operate at higher frequencies. Higher processing speeds and reduced size can lead to various issues, including power and temperature-related issues. Accordingly, many processors are now being manufactured that include multiple cores in a single package, and even multiple cores on a single die. Such processors can perform high-level processing tasks at lower temperatures, reducing heat dissipation. Furthermore, greater amounts of processing can be done at lower frequencies using multiple cores.
However, integrating multiple cores in a single package such as a processor socket can lead to various issues. One such issue is the effect of multiple cores on electrical performance. Specifically, multiple cores, each of which includes digital logic circuitry as well as analog input/output (I/O) interface circuitry, create a significant electrical load on an interconnect medium through which the processor socket is coupled to a system. For example, many computer systems include a system bus, often referred to as a front side bus (FSB), that is a multi-drop bus used to couple the processor to other system components, such as a memory controller hub (MCH), system memory, and other system components. To avoid negative electrical performance issues, the FSB may be controlled to run at a lower frequency, affecting performance. Such a lower bus frequency can significantly impact performance for dual core or other multiple core devices, as bandwidth demand can increase in proportion to the number of cores.
Some dual core processor designs connect cores together in a package in a manner similar to routing between multiple processor sockets in a multiple processor system. However, such a design degrades electrical performance of the FSB. In particular, the package trace length is significantly increased and capacitance is also increased, which can significantly limit I/O frequency. Other manners of connecting cores can cause significant design efforts that increase complexity and affect a base core design.
In various embodiments, multiple cores may be connected within a package with minimal impact on both core design and I/O frequency. Specifically, by presenting a single load to a system bus, the frequency impact of multiple cores may be minimized. In the embodiments described herein, a single load may be achieved by digitally combining bus signals of multiple cores on a single die (i.e., of a processor socket) and driving the combination out to the system bus via a common analog interface. To obtain the combination, digital interface logic coupled between the cores and the common analog interface may act, in effect, as a wired OR circuit.
In some systems, a system bus using gunning transceiver logic (GTL+) signaling technology may be used to couple system components together. Such a system bus may logically act as a wired OR bus. By moving the wired OR logic into digital circuitry interfacing the multiple cores with a common analog interface of a processor socket, improved electrical performance and ease of implementation can be realized. That is, only a single electrical load is seen by the system bus, and minimal or no changes to a base core design are needed to handle the combining of core inputs and outputs. Accordingly, there is minimal effect on the cores' pipelines, speed paths or logical operation.
Referring now to
Each core 20 may include all logic and resources for the given core such as pipeline resources, execution units, cache memories, register files and other such structures. Furthermore, each core 20 may include its own dedicated digital I/O interface, respectively a digital I/O 25a and a digital I/O 25b (generically, digital I/O 25). As described further below, digital I/O 25 may include various logic circuitry to provide an interface for signals between the associated core and an analog I/O interface of a processor. In various embodiments, digital I/O 25 may include all bus control logic for its associated core (as if it were the only core present). In other words, each digital I/O 25 is a bus controller for its associated core 20. Thus, as shown in
However, each core 20 lacks dedicated analog interface circuitry. Instead, a common analog I/O interface (analog I/O) 30 may be present and used to couple signals from both cores 20a and 20b to and from an interconnect to which processor socket 10 is coupled. This common analog interface between multiple cores and an interconnect, e.g., a bus to which the processor is coupled, may improve signaling latency and ease of design when integrating a multicore processor into a system using a shared bus such as a front side bus. While not shown in the high-level view of
While described with this particular implementation in
Referring now to
As shown in
Core 20a may further include a flip-flop 114a coupled to provide source synchronous data to be transmitted on an associated source synchronous transmit data line (i.e., SSTxData#). Similarly, incoming source synchronous data may be received along a source synchronous receive data line (i.e., SSRxData#) via a storage device such as a first-in-first-out (FIFO) 116a. Note that such a source synchronous path may improve performance by transmitting data multiple times per bus clock (e.g., 4×). In addition, core 20a may further include a flip-flop 118a that is coupled to provide data to a source synchronous transmit strobe line (i.e., SSTxStb#). Note that flip-flops 114a and 118a may be clocked in opposing relation by a source synchronous clock (i.e., SSClock). In turn, the source synchronous clock and a drive core signal (DriveCore) may be coupled to a logic gate 119a that in turn is coupled to provide a drive clock signal, namely a source synchronous drive clock signal (i.e., SSDrvClk). Note that similar circuitry to that discussed above is present in core 20b (shown with the same reference numerals and the designator “b”).
Each of these above-discussed signal lines may be coupled to routing channel 120 which in turn provides signals to and from additional digital logic within digital portion 25. Routing channel 120 may include amplifiers, repeaters and the like. Such additional logic within digital portion 25 may provide for selection of an active one of cores 20a and 20b for transmission/receipt of data via the signal lines. Accordingly, routing channel 120 may include circuitry to route signals to/from cores 20a and 20b from/to selected signal lines in digital portion 25. In the transmit direction, common clock transmit signals (i.e., c0CCTxData# or c1CCTxData#) from both cores may be coupled to a multiplexer 140 that is controlled by design for test (DFT)/control register-related signals (not shown in
Referring still to
For incoming source synchronous data to processor 100 from a bus, the data is coupled through a buffer 161 and is provided to a selected latch 163. The operation of latch 163 may be controlled by an incoming source synchronous strobe signal (i.e., SSRxStb#). When latched through, data is passed to a multiplexer 165 and is provided to routing channel 120 as the source synchronous receive data (i.e., SSRxData#). As shown in
Still referring to
In one embodiment, processor 310 may be coupled over a front side bus 315 to a memory hub 330, which, in turn, may be coupled to a system memory 320, which may be a dynamic random access memory (DRAM) in one embodiment, via a memory bus 325. While not shown in the embodiment of
Memory hub 330 may also be coupled (via a hub link 338) to an input/output (I/O) hub 340 that is coupled to a first bus 342 and to a second bus 344. First bus 342 may be coupled to an I/O controller 346 that controls access to one or more I/O devices. As shown in
Second bus 344 may also be coupled to various components including, for example, a non-volatile memory 360 such as a flash memory and a wireless interface 362. Wireless interface 362 may be used in certain embodiments to communicate with remote devices. As shown in
Embodiments may be implemented in code and may be stored on a storage medium having stored thereon instructions which can be used to program a system to perform the instructions. The storage medium may include, but is not limited to, any type of disk including floppy disks, optical disks, compact disk read-only memories (CD-ROMs), compact disk rewritables (CD-RWs), and magneto-optical disks, semiconductor devices such as read-only memories (ROMs), random access memories (RAMs) such as dynamic random access memories (DRAMs), static random access memories (SRAMs), erasable programmable read-only memories (EPROMs), flash memories, electrically erasable programmable read-only memories (EEPROMs), magnetic or optical cards, or any other type of media suitable for storing electronic instructions.
While the present invention has been described with respect to a limited number of embodiments, those skilled in the art will appreciate numerous modifications and variations therefrom. It is intended that the appended claims cover all such modifications and variations as fall within the true spirit and scope of this present invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4389710 | Rasmussen | Jun 1983 | A |
4606044 | Kudo | Aug 1986 | A |
4698753 | Hubbins et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4803618 | Ita et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
5038143 | Hester | Aug 1991 | A |
6009488 | Kavipurapu | Dec 1999 | A |
6090650 | Dabral et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6253290 | Nakamoto | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6725317 | Bouchier et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6836813 | Gulick | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6925532 | Fujibayashi et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7099949 | Vanhoof et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7117419 | Nemawarkar et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
20020161988 | Barlow et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020169938 | Scott et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020174318 | Stuttard et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030103490 | Noel, Jr. et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030120896 | Gosior et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030217347 | Meyer et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040215987 | Farkas et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040225863 | Yamashita | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050080954 | Castro et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050080999 | Angsmark et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20060076827 | Albright et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060095750 | Nye et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20070067483 | Fallon | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070130445 | Lau et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070220233 A1 | Sep 2007 | US |