The disclosure herein relates to electronic communications, and more particularly to mitigating interference in signals transmitted over communication channels.
High-speed Ethernet systems such as 10 GBASE-T provide a convenient way to transfer data across existing cable infrastructures.
Due to the high speed of data transfer and the marginal quality of the existing infrastructure cabling, high-speed Ethernet systems are often susceptible to various sources of noise, including radio-frequency interference (RFI) noise. The transceiver circuits are also susceptible to cable discharge events (CDE). These events are generally static discharges that occur as an Ethernet cable is plugged into or comes into close proximity with a corresponding connector.
While the separate common-mode channel architecture works well for its intended applications, a separate transformer circuit is utilized, thereby increasing the cost associated with the magnetic package. Accordingly, what is needed is a system and associated method that minimizes cost associated with the magnetic package, yet still provides the capability to cancel the RFI.
Embodiments of the disclosure are illustrated by way of example, and not by way of limitation, in the figures of the accompanying drawings and in which like reference numerals refer to similar elements and in which:
Embodiments of an Ethernet cable connection system are disclosed. In one embodiment, the system includes a magnetic package having a line interface to couple to a plurality of Ethernet line conductors, and a PHY interface to couple to a plurality of transceiver circuits corresponding to the line conductors. The magnetic package is operable to isolate the line conductors from the corresponding transceiver circuits. The system also includes a termination impedance network and a common-mode detection circuit. The termination impedance network is coupled to the magnetic package line interface. The common-mode detection circuit includes a sense impedance coupled to the termination impedance network that is operable to detect a common-mode signal associated with at least one of the plurality of Ethernet line conductors. A bypass path feeds the detected common-mode signal to the plurality of transceiver circuits without isolation by the magnetic package.
In a further embodiment, an Ethernet transceiver integrated circuit is disclosed. The circuit includes a plurality of data ports operable to couple to differential physical channels that are isolated from corresponding line conductors via respective transformer circuits. A common-mode port is operable to receive a common-mode signal from a bypass path that does not interface with an isolation transformer.
In yet another embodiment, a method of providing a common-mode signal associated with one or more line conductors to an Ethernet transceiver chip is disclosed. The method includes magnetically isolating the one or more line conductors from corresponding transceiver circuits formed on the Ethernet transceiver chip; detecting a common-mode signal from at least one of the line conductors; generating a sensed common-mode signal from the detected common-mode signal; and presenting the sensed common-mode signal to the transceiver circuitry along a bypass path without magnetically isolating the sensed common-mode signal.
Further referring to
With the common-mode signal detected and placed on the bypass path 308, it may be directly fed to the PHY transceiver circuitry, thus bypassing the magnetic package 302 and avoiding the cost of a separate transformer. Alternatively, the bypass path may be routed through the magnetic package, but without the need for coupling to a separate transformer. The termination network may be included in the magnetic package, or in a line card or other structure associated with the Ethernet system.
One or more processors 402 are typically included in transceiver 400, or connected to the transceiver to control various operations for transceiver components described below. In the transmitter path TX, an encoder 404 can be used to encode data desired to be transmitted in a particular desired format or standard, followed by a scrambler 406 for self-synchronized scrambling of the data to be transmitted, providing clock transitions, a statistically random power spectrum for EMI (electromagnetic interference) control, equalizer convergence, etc. A low density parity check (LDPC) encoder 408 encodes the data according to the parity check for error correction. A 128 DSQ mapper 410 (or other type of mapper) then can use a coset-partitioned constellation to map the data to symbols, and each 128-DSQ symbol is transmitted using two back-to-back PAM-16 signals (Pulse Amplitude Modulation, 16 levels). A Tomlinson-Harashima Precoding (THP) precoder 412 can then adjust the signal to assist the far-end receiver in performing signal equalization. An analog front end (AFE) for the transmitter can include a digital-to-analog converter (DAC) and driver block 414 which converts the data to analog form for transmission and transmits the data via the hybrid coupler and transformer block 416 to the channel output port.
In a receiver portion of the transceiver 400, data is received at the hybrid coupler and transformer block 416. Four data communication channels are used in a 10 GBASE-T embodiment (other amounts of channels can be used in other embodiments), and are sent to an analog front end (AFE) for the receiver which can include a variable gain amplifier (VGA) and filter 418 for filtering, and an analog-to-digital converter (A/D) 420. An equalizer block 422 can include one or more equalizers to remove inter-symbol interference (ISI). The output of the equalizer block 422 is summed with the outputs of a plurality of filters 440, 442 and 444 (described below) at adder 424, and the output of the adder can be provided to a slicer 426 which can provide an average noise level in the received signal. The signal can then be provided to a DSQ128 decoder 428, which outputs decoded data to a framer 430 that extracts frames from the received data and provides the frames to an LDPC decoder 432 which error-corrects the data. The data can then be provided to a descrambler 434 which outputs de-scrambled data to the encoder 404 for provision to a connected computer system, processor, or other device.
The filters 440, 442 and 444 are used to reduce echo and crosstalk (NEXT and FEXT) noise which may be introduced in the transmission and reception of data over one or more of the four communication channels. The filters cancel out the effect of signal echo and crosstalk from adjacent lines to achieve an acceptable bit error rate. The output of the THP precoder 412 in the transmitter portion TX is provided to the Echo canceller 440 and the NEXT canceller 442, which calculate the values for cancellation of echo and NEXT and output these values to the adder 424. Similarly, the output of ADC 420 is provided to the FEXT canceller 444, which calculates the values for cancellation of FEXT and outputs the values to the adder 424. The digital values of echo and crosstalk calculated by the filter are subtracted from the incoming noisy analog data (digitized by ADC 420) by adder 424 to provide received data on each channel with reduced noise.
The common mode signal detected by the circuit in
The transceiver circuit exhibits certain signaling parameters that initially undergo a standard training sequence to achieve fully-functional nominal operation of data communication over a signaling link. The training sequence also establishes an initial clock synchronization that establishes a phase-locked condition between link partners. The nominal operation is a predefined level of operation at which parameters are at a particular target level (such as bit error rate being under a particular target rate), and for which the transceiver can transmit and receive data over the link. The full training sequence is a predefined sequence of stages or steps known by the link partners, although the boundaries of the stages can be overlapped or blurred in some embodiments. The sequence typically occurs at a predefined point of operation, such as at startup when a transceiver is powered on or is first connected to a communication link. During nominal operation, after the full training sequence, the transceiver continues to adapt parameters (i.e., a continuous adaptation) to changing characteristics of the link based on received data. In one embodiment, more fully described in copending U.S. application Ser. No. 12/551,347, filed Aug. 31, 2009, entitled Fast Retraining For Transceivers In Communication Systems, and assigned to the assignee of the present invention, the training sequence may be shortened to reduce training time.
Operation of the common mode detection circuit, in one embodiment, involves steps generally set forth in the flow diagram of
Further referring to
The bandpass filtering not only attenuates signals at frequencies outside the defined band, but also reduces the peak energy associated with those signals. As a result, where the risk of CDE is high, the bypassed common mode path 606 can be fed directly to the transceiver PHY's with a higher level of safety via the inclusion of the filter circuitry 608 and 610.
A further embodiment, illustrated in
In the foregoing description and in the accompanying drawings, specific terminology and drawing symbols have been set forth to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. In some instances, the terminology and symbols may imply specific details that are not required to practice the invention. For example, any of the specific numbers of bits, signal path widths, signaling or operating frequencies, component circuits or devices and the like may be different from those described above in alternative embodiments. Also, the interconnection between circuit elements or circuit blocks shown or described as multi-conductor signal links may alternatively be single-conductor signal links, and single conductor signal links may alternatively be multi-conductor signal links. Signals and signaling paths shown or described as being single-ended may also be differential, and vice-versa. Similarly, signals described or depicted as having active-high or active-low logic levels may have opposite logic levels in alternative embodiments. Component circuitry within integrated circuit devices may be implemented using metal oxide semiconductor (MOS) technology, bipolar technology or any other technology in which logical and analog circuits may be implemented. With respect to terminology, a signal is said to be “asserted” when the signal is driven to a low or high logic state (or charged to a high logic state or discharged to a low logic state) to indicate a particular condition. Conversely, a signal is said to be “deasserted” to indicate that the signal is driven (or charged or discharged) to a state other than the asserted state (including a high or low logic state, or the floating state that may occur when the signal driving circuit is transitioned to a high impedance condition, such as an open drain or open collector condition). A signal driving circuit is said to “output” a signal to a signal receiving circuit when the signal driving circuit asserts (or deasserts, if explicitly stated or indicated by context) the signal on a signal line coupled between the signal driving and signal receiving circuits. A signal line is said to be “activated” when a signal is asserted on the signal line, and “deactivated” when the signal is deasserted. Additionally, the prefix symbol “/” attached to signal names indicates that the signal is an active low signal (i.e., the asserted state is a logic low state). A line over a signal name (e.g., ‘
While the invention has been described with reference to specific embodiments thereof, it will be evident that various modifications and changes may be made thereto without departing from the broader spirit and scope of the invention. For example, features or aspects of any of the embodiments may be applied, at least where practicable, in combination with any other of the embodiments or in place of counterpart features or aspects thereof. Accordingly, the specification and drawings are to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3506906 | Nestor | Apr 1970 | A |
3671859 | Miller | Jun 1972 | A |
4797902 | Nishiguchi et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4870370 | Hedberg et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
5283811 | Chennakeshu et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5550924 | Helf et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5777692 | Ghosh | Jul 1998 | A |
5832032 | Overbury | Nov 1998 | A |
5889511 | Ong et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5910960 | Claydon et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5995566 | Rickard et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5995567 | Cioffi et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6011508 | Perreault et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6035360 | Doidge et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6052420 | Yeap et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6069917 | Werner et al. | May 2000 | A |
6285718 | Reuven | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6385315 | Viadella et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6424234 | Stevenson | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6459739 | Vitenberg | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6486746 | Gilbert | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6683913 | Kantschuk | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6690739 | Mui | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6711207 | Amrany et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6734659 | Fortner | May 2004 | B1 |
6771720 | Yang et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6924724 | Grilo et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6934345 | Chu et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6959056 | Yeap et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6999504 | Amrany et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7026730 | Marshall et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7031402 | Takada | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7103013 | Kim et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7123117 | Chen et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7164764 | Zimmerman et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7173992 | Frigon | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7180940 | Li et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7200180 | Verbin et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7315592 | Tsatsanis et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7333603 | Sallaway et al. | Feb 2008 | B1 |
RE40149 | Vitenberg | Mar 2008 | E |
7403041 | Bajdechi et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7440892 | Tamura | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7457386 | Phanse | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7459982 | Miao | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7492840 | Chan | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7522928 | O'Mahony | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7542528 | Cheong | Jun 2009 | B1 |
7634032 | Chu et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7656956 | King | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7706434 | Farjadrad | Apr 2010 | B1 |
7708595 | Chow et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
8094546 | Schenk | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8139602 | Meier | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8284007 | Langner et al. | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8320411 | Sedarat et al. | Nov 2012 | B1 |
8442099 | Sederat | May 2013 | B1 |
8472532 | Schley-May et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8625704 | Sedarat et al. | Jan 2014 | B1 |
20030186591 | Jensen et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030223488 | Li et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030223505 | Verbin et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040010203 | Bibian et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040023631 | Deutsch et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040164619 | Parker et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040213366 | Ono | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040239465 | Chen et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040252755 | Jaffe et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040257743 | Chen et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050018777 | Azadet | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050025266 | Chan | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050053229 | Tsatsanis et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050097218 | Sultenfuss et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050123081 | Shirani | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050135489 | Ho et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050203744 | Tamura | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050243483 | Chen et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060018388 | Chan | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060056503 | Keshab et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060159186 | King | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060182014 | Lusky et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060256880 | Frisch | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070014378 | Parhi et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070081475 | Telado et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070146011 | O'Mahony et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070192505 | Dalmia | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070258517 | Rollings et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070280388 | Torre et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080089433 | Cho et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080095283 | Shoor et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080107167 | Tung et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080160915 | Sommer et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080198909 | Tsatsanis et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080267212 | Crawley et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090061808 | Higgins | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090097401 | Diab | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090154455 | Diab | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090161781 | Kolze | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20100046543 | Parnaby | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100073072 | Ullen et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100074310 | Roo et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100086019 | Agazzi et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100111202 | Schley-May et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20110032048 | Wu et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110069794 | Tavassoli Kilani et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110106459 | Chris et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110212692 | Hahn et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110256857 | Chen et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110293041 | Luo et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110296267 | Malkin et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20130259175 | Schley-May et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130286864 | Karam | Oct 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO9740587 | Oct 1997 | WO |
WO2011056970 | May 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 12/563,938, filed Sep. 21, 2009, Sedarat. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/604,323, filed Oct. 22, 2009, Sedarat et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/604,351, filed Oct. 22, 2009, Sedarat et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/604,358, filed Oct. 22, 2009, Sedarat et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/977,844, filed Dec. 23, 2010, Sedarat. |