This Application claims priority of China Patent Application No. 201711205223.1, filed on Nov. 27, 2017, the entirety of which is incorporated by reference herein.
The present invention relates to signal communication.
Communication between different devices/functional blocks is an issue that has received a lot of focus in the electronic design field.
With the development of SoC (System on a Chip) technology, the communication control for SoC has come to involve an on-chip interconnection network in the SoC. Fluent communication between different devices/functional blocks (or IPs) in SoC is an important part of the overall design.
Communication between devices/functional blocks is optimized.
A communication controller in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the disclosure has a transaction capability table and a source control logic circuit. The transaction capability table records a first value representing the practical transaction capability of a source module for transmitting a communication transaction to a destination module. The exchange of transaction capability, regarding the destination module, between the source module and at least one neighboring source module is taken into account in the first value. The source control logic circuit manages the transaction capability table and controls the source module to transmit a communication transaction to the destination module based on the first value recorded in the transaction capability table.
In an exemplary embodiment, the transaction capability table further records a second value and a third value. The second value represents borrowed transaction capability that the source module borrows from the neighboring source module for transmitting a communication transaction to the destination module. The third value represents a loan of transaction capability that the source module lends to the neighboring source module to transmit a communication transaction to the destination module. The transaction capability table may further record borrowing information and loan information. The borrowing information lists neighboring source modules from which the source module receives the borrowed transaction capability. The loan information lists neighboring source modules that receive the loan of transaction capability.
A system on a chip in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the disclosure has a plurality of source modules and at least one destination module. Each source module has one of the aforementioned communication controllers to transmit at least one communication transaction to the destination module.
A communication method in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the disclosure includes the following steps: using a transaction capability table to record a first value representing practical transaction capability of a source module for transmitting a communication transaction to a destination module, wherein exchange of transaction capability regarding the destination module between the source module and at least one neighboring source module is taken into account in the first value; and managing the transaction capability table and controlling the source module to transmit a communication transaction to the destination module based on the first value recorded in the transaction capability table.
A detailed description is given in the following embodiments with reference to the accompanying drawings.
The present invention can be more fully understood by reading the subsequent detailed description and examples with references made to the accompanying drawings, wherein:
The following description shows exemplary embodiments of carrying out the invention. This description is made for the purpose of illustrating the general principles of the invention and should not be taken in a limiting sense. The scope of the invention is best determined by reference to the appended claims.
The communication technology described in this disclosure may be applied to various architectures of electronic systems. In the following, an on-chip interconnection network in SoC (System on a Chip) is discussed as an example, but it is not intended to be limited thereto.
The functional blocks in the SoC 100 sometimes act as a source of communication data, sometimes as a destination for communication data. For example, a central processing unit may be a source module that provides data to be transmitted to the cache L2/LLC controller via the on-chip interconnection network 102. The central processing unit may also be a destination module that receives the data that the memory controller read from a memory. Communication optimization may be applied to modify a source module or a destination module. The functional blocks that switch between the two roles (sometimes being a source module and sometimes being a destination module) may combine the two types of communication optimization solutions.
First, the modifications made to the source module for communication optimization are discussed.
The transaction capability table Tab0 is discussed in this paragraph as an example. In the transaction capability table Tab0, several factors are recorded for each of the destination modules T0 . . . T(n-1). The factors include values representing intrinsic transaction capability k, borrowed transaction capability Cb#, a loan Cl# of transaction capability, and practical transaction capability TC#. The practical transaction capability TC# is estimated from the intrinsic transaction capability k, the borrowed transaction capability Cb#, the loan Cl# of transaction capability and transaction capability consumption C#. Based on the practical transaction capability TC#, it is determined whether the corresponding source module could transmit a communication transaction to the corresponding destination module without affecting the communication network. The non-zero value of the practical transaction capability TC# represents that the corresponding source module is allowed to issue a communication transaction to the corresponding destination module. When the practical transaction capability TC# is zero, the source module is not allowed to request a communication transaction to the destination module to avoid blocking the communication network.
In this paragraph, the contents recorded in the transaction capability table Tab0 for the destination modules T0 is discussed in detail. The intrinsic transaction capability k may be r/m. The number of trackers Tracker_0, Tracker_1 . . . Tracker_(r−1) contained in the queue Q0 is r, which is expected to be evenly shared by the m source modules S0 . . . . The borrowed transaction capability Cb# shows how much transaction capacity the source module S0 has borrowed from other source modules S1 . . . S(m-1) to transmit communication transactions to the destination module T0. In an exemplary embodiment, borrowing information Sbinfo is recorded to show which source modules the borrowed transaction capability Cb# comes from. The loan Cl# of transaction capability shows how much transaction capacity the source module S0 lends other source modules S1 . . . S(m-1) to transmit communication transactions with the destination module T0. In an exemplary embodiment, loan information Slinfo is recorded which lists the source modules that get the loan Cl# of transaction capability. The transaction capability consumption C# reflects the number of communication transactions that have been transmitted from the source module S0 to the destination module T0 and is being processed in the destination module T0. When one communication transaction requested by the source module S0 is stored to the queue Q0 of the destination module T0, the value representing the transaction capability consumption C# is increased by one. After a communication transaction is finished and removed from the queue Q0, the value representing the transaction capability consumption C# is decreased by 1. An estimate of the practical transaction capability TC# of the source module S0 to request communication transaction to the destination module T0 can be calculated using the following formula:
TC#=k+Cb#−Cl#−C#
By sharing the transaction capability regarding a particular destination module between the different source modules, the practical transaction capability TC# can be kept above zero. As a result, the source module S0 is no longer limited to the intrinsic transaction capability k if it has a strong communication transaction demand to the destination module T0. On the contrary, if the source module S0 does not have a demand for communication transactions to the destination module T0, its intrinsic transaction capability k can be lent to the other source modules S1 . . . In one exemplary embodiment, the loan Cl# of transaction capacity cannot exceed the intrinsic transaction capability k. Only the intrinsic transaction capability k can be loaned.
Referring to
In step S404, it detects whether a request for communication transaction occurs and the source module Sx and the destination module Ty regarding the communication transaction are recorded. With regard to this communication transaction, step S406 determines whether the practical transaction capability TC# of the source module Sx to the destination module Ty is greater than zero. If it is greater than 0, the flow proceeds to step S408, and the source module Sx transmits the communication transaction detected in step S404 to the queue Qy of the destination module Ty to be temporarily stored and dynamically managed in one of the trackers. In step S408, a value representing the transaction capability consumption C# of the source module Sx to the destination module Ty is increased by one.
When it is determined in step S406 that the source module Sx has no transaction capability to the destination module Ty (the practical transaction capability TC# is 0), the flow proceeds to step S412 of
When it is determined in step S412 that the source module S, has no transaction capability lent to other source modules to transact with the destination module Ty (the loan Cl# of transaction capability is 0), the flow proceeds through the node B to step S422 of
When it is determined in step S426 that none of the other source modules are idle, step S432 is performed. In step S432, transaction capability tables are checked. Regarding the destination module Ty, the loans Cl# of transaction capability are checked. The source module Sz having the loan Cl# not exceeding the value k or not exceeding a threshold value 1 th (that is smaller than the value k) is selected in step S428 to lend the source module Sx the transaction capability. In an exemplary embodiment, the selection further depends on the transmission distance. The source module Sx may select the nearest source module to borrow the transaction capability. In an exemplary embodiment, the selection further depends on whether the owned transaction capability is plenty. The source module Sx may select to borrow transaction capability from a source module that has plenty of transaction capability to lend other source modules, i.e. having the highest number of (k-Cl#). Then, step S430 is performed for the corresponding modifications to the transaction capability tables Tabx and Tabz. Then, step S408 is performed. The source module Sx sends the planned communication transaction to the destination module Ty, and the value representing the transaction capability consumption C# of the source module Sx to the destination module Ty is increased by one.
When it is determined in step S432 that no source module is qualified for sharing out the transaction capability because the checked loans Cl# of transaction capability are too high, step S434 is performed to wait for the completion of a communication transaction that have been transmitted from the source module Sx to the destination module Ty and processed in the destination module Ty (for example, waiting for the value representing the transaction capacity consumption C# to be decreased by 1). Then, step S408 is performed. The source module Sx Sends the Planned Communication Transaction to the Destination Module Ty, and the value representing the transaction capability consumption C# of the source module Sx to the destination module Ty is increased by one.
According to the above, the use of the all trackers of the destination module is optimized.
The number of trackers in the different queues Q0 . . . Q(n=1) (provided by the different destination modules T0 . . . T(n−1)) may be not unified as r, and may be different from each other.
In the following paragraphs, the optimized communication technology implemented on the side of destination modules is discussed.
In step S602, it is monitored whether there is a plan for a communication transaction, and the source module Sx and the destination module Ty regarding the planned communication transaction are recorded. For the planned communication transaction, step S604 is performed to check whether the retransmission list ReTy records any retransmission needs. If yes, step S606 is performed to list the identification number ID# of the communication transaction planed in step S602 in the retransmission list ReTy. Then, step S602 is performed to continue monitoring whether there are other plans for communication transactions.
When the retransmission list ReTy checked in step S604 shows no communication transaction waiting to be retransmitted, step S608 is performed to check whether the queue Qy is full. When the queue Qy is full, step S606 is performed and the identification number ID# of the communication transaction planed in step S602 is listed in the retransmission list ReTy. When the queue Qy has any empty tracker, the flow proceeds to step S610. The source module Sx transmits the planned communication transaction to the queue Qy of the destination module Ty to be temporarily stored and dynamically managed in one of the trackers. Then, step S602 is performed to continue monitoring whether there are other plans of communication transactions.
In step S702, it is monitored whether any tracker is released and the queue Qh providing the released tracker is recorded. For the released tracker, step S704 is performed to check whether the retransmission list ReTh records a retransmission demand for a communication transaction. If yes, step S706 is performed. According to the oldest identification number ID# recorded in the retransmission list ReTh, the corresponding source module Sz is obtained. A retransmission request is issued and the source module Sz retransmits the communication transaction (with the identification number ID#) to the destination module Th to be temporarily stored and dynamically managed by the tracker released from the queue Qh. In the retransmission list ReTh, the identification number ID# of the retransmitted communication transaction is deleted. Then, step S702 is performed to continue monitoring whether any tracker of the queues Q0 . . . Q(n-1) is released. When it is determined in step S704 that the retransmission list ReTh does not record any retransmission demand for any communication transaction, the flow may also go back to step S702 to monitor whether any tracker is released.
Each of the queues Q0 . . . Q(n-1) has r trackers Tracker_0 to Tracker_(r−1) for temporarily storage and dynamic management of communication transactions transmitted from the source modules S0 . . . S(m-1) through the on-chip interconnection network 102. One tracker is provided to correspond to one communication transaction. Each tracker has a state machine that dynamically manages the communication transaction temporarily stored therein. Each of the waiting queues WQ0 . . . WQ(n-1) has P entries Entry_0 to Entry_(P−1). When all trackers of one queue are occupied, the corresponding waiting queue uses one column to record the currently-received communication transaction. When one tracker is released, a communication transaction temporarily stored in the corresponding waiting queue is moved to the released tracker. The waiting queues WQ0 . . . WQ(n-1) generally do not include any state machine and are not responsible for the management of the temporarily stored communication transactions. Therefore, the size and power consumption of the queues WQ0 to WQ(n-1) are much smaller than the queues Q0 to Q(n-1). Each of the retransmission lists ReT0 . . . ReT(n-1) has T entries Entry_0, Entry_1 . . . Entry (T−1). When all entries of one waiting queue are occupied, the corresponding retransmission list records the identification number ID# of the planed communication transaction. When an entry of the waiting queue is released later, a retransmitting request is sent according to the recorded identification number ID# and thereby the corresponding source module retransmits the communication transaction that was not successfully transmitted before. The retransmitted communication transaction is stored in the waiting queue waiting to be moved to a released tracker of the corresponding queue. According to the design of
In step S1002, it is monitored whether there is a plane for communication transaction, and it is recorded that the communication transaction is issued by the source module Sx to the destination module Ty. For the planed communication transaction, step S1004 is performed to check whether the retransmission list ReTy records an identification number ID# of another communication transaction to be retransmitted. If yes, step S1006 lists the identification number ID# of the planed communication transaction (detected in step S1002) in the retransmission list ReTy. Then, the flow may return to step S1002 to continue monitoring whether there are other plans of for communication transactions.
If it is determined in step S1004 that the retransmission list ReTy does not mention any communication transaction to be retransmitted, step S1008 is performed to check whether the waiting queue WQy stores any communication transaction waiting to be moved to the queue Qy. If so, step S1010 is performed to check if the waiting queue WQy is full. If it is full, the flow proceeds to step S1006, and the identification number ID# of the planned communication transaction (detected in step S1002) is added to the retransmission list ReTy. If there is an empty entry in the waiting queue WQy, the flow proceeds to step S1012, and the source module Sx Transmits the Planned Communication Transaction to the Waiting Queue WQy of the destination module Ty for temporary storage. Then, the flow may return to step S1002 to continue monitoring whether there are other plans for communication transactions.
When it is determined in step S1008 that the waiting queue WQy does not contain any communication transaction waiting to be moved to the queue Qy, step S1014 checks if the queue Qy is full. If the queue Qy is full, the flow proceeds to step S1012, and the source module S, transmits the planned communication transaction to the waiting queue WQy of the destination module Ty for temporary storage. If the queue Qy has an empty tracker for the planned communication transaction, the flow proceeds to step S1016. The source module Sx transmits the planned communication transaction to queue Qy of destination module Ty to be stored in one tracker for temporary storage and dynamic management. Then, the flow may return to step S1002 to continue monitoring whether there are other plans for communication transactions.
Step S1102 monitors whether a tracker is released and the queue Qh releasing the tracker is recorded. For the released tracker of the queue Qh, step S1104 is performed to check whether any communication transaction is waiting in the waiting queue WQh to be moved to the queue Qh. If yes, step S1106 moves the oldest communication transaction stored in the waiting queue WQh to the tracker released by the queue Qh for temporary storage and dynamic management in the tracker. Then, the flow may return to step S1102 to continue monitoring whether any tracker in the queues Q0 . . . Q(n-1) is released. When it is determined in step S1104 that there is no communication transaction in the waiting queue WQh waiting to be moved to the queue Qh, the flow returns to step S1102 to continue monitoring whether any tracker of the queues Q0 . . . Q(n-1) is released.
Step S1112 monitors whether the waiting queues WQ0 . . . WQ(n−1) have an entry released (e.g., moving a communication transaction from a waiting queue to a tracker in step S1106 of
The monitoring step S1102 of
As the aforementioned discussion, the turbo queues provided in the destination modules T0 . . . T(n-1) result in significant improvements. Other variations are possible. The number of trackers in each of the queues Q0 . . . Q(n-1) of the different destination modules T0 . . . T(n-1) is not limited to r. The different queues Q0 . . . Q(n-1) may have different number of trackers. The different retransmission lists ReT0 . . . ReT(n-1) of the different destination modules T0 . . . T(n-1) may be different in size. The different waiting queues WQ0 . . . WQ(n-1) of the different destination modules T0 . . . T(n-1) may have different number of entries.
Other techniques that use the above concepts in signal transmitting and receiving are within the scope of the disclosure. Based on the above contents, the present invention further relates to a communication method.
While the invention has been described by way of example and in terms of the preferred embodiments, it should be understood that the invention is not limited to the disclosed embodiments. On the contrary, it is intended to cover various modifications and similar arrangements (as would be apparent to those skilled in the art). Therefore, the scope of the appended claims should be accorded the broadest interpretation so as to encompass all such modifications and similar arrangements.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
201711205223.1 | Nov 2017 | CN | national |