The present invention relates to communication devices and methods for hearing impaired persons and more specifically to concepts related to helping a hearing impaired person maintain a contact list and to personally customize the tone of voice messages broadcast by a communication device used by the hearing impaired person.
Special phones which are referred to hereinafter as assisted user devices have been developed that provide captioning services to deaf or partially hearing impaired persons (hereinafter “assisted users”). To this end, when a hearing user and an assisted user are participating in a voice telephone call, when the hearing user speaks, the hearing user's voice is transmitted to a remote relay where the hearing user's voice is translated into text, often with the aid of a call assistant or relay operator. The text is transmitted to the assisted user's device where the text is displayed via a device display for the assisted user to view, generally at the same time that the hearing user's voice is broadcast via a device speaker to the assisted user to hear. Transmission of voice and text can be along various types of communication links including conventional telephone lines, the internet or some other type of communication network, wirelessly, etc. Exemplary assisted user devices and relay systems are well known in the art. For example, see U.S. Pat. No. 6,603,835 entitled “System For Text Assisted Telephony” which issued on Aug. 5, 2003 and which is incorporated herein in its entirety by reference. While relay assisted user devices have proven extremely useful to hearing impaired persons, such devices still have several shortcomings.
One shortcoming associated with assisted user devices is related to maintaining up-to-date contact information on the device. At least some assisted user devices have the ability to store contact information for expediting access to phone numbers and other information and for expediting the process of placing calls to others. Here, in many cases, a phone number dialing keyboard serves double duty as a tool to enter contact information including contact names, phone and other numbers, e-mail addresses and perhaps other information. In some cases a full QWERTY keyboard may be provided for entering contact information. To initiate a call to a contact from a previously entered contact list, some type of input device is provided for scrolling through or otherwise searching for a specific contact and to place a call to a selected contact via the assisted user's device.
While device stored contact information has proven very useful in assisted user devices when used, the processes for entering contact information have often proven to be an impediment to use. To this end, double duty data input components (e.g., a dialing pad) on some assisted user devices often are not intuitive to use. Even where an assisted user's device includes a full QWERTY keyboard for information entry, steps required for entering contact information are often complex and/or confusing. Where a tool is not intuitive, users routinely forego use of the tool and the advantages associated therewith.
Many people now use computers to maintain extensive contact information for business and personal associates. For instance, Microsoft Outlook is one popular software program that is used by many computer users to maintain contact information. One advantage associated with maintaining contact information via a computer is that computers include a full QUERTY keyboard and a large display for entering contact information.
In addition to maintaining contact information via a computer, many smart phone and other communication devices today provide the ability for a device user to store and access contact information including names, phone numbers, e-mail addresses, regular addresses, pictures, etc., for virtually thousands of people. In many cases a smart phone user is also a computer user. Most phone and computer users want access to the same contact information via their computer and their smart phone. For this reason, systems have been developed whereby a phone and a computer can be linked to the same contact storing account so that contact information can be automatically synchronized between a smart phone and a computer.
While automated synchronization between smart phone and computer contact information is useful if an assisted user has and regularly uses a computer, many assisted users do not regularly use a computer and, if they do use a computer, may not use software on the computer to store contact information. In this regard, many hearing impaired persons are elderly, having lost a portion of their hearing capability over time. Elderly people often do not keep up with technological advances and therefore many are uncomfortable with using software including contact storing software. Thus, even if contact information on an assisted user's device and a computer were to be synchronized, in many cases an assisted user would not take advantage of the synchronizing function or maintaining a complete contact list and instead would forego advantages associated with an up-to-date list.
Another shortcoming associated with assisted user devices is related to customizing audio tone parameters for specific assisted users. It has been recognized that people that experience hearing loss do not all experience hearing loss in the same way. Thus, for instance, one assisted user may experience loss of hearing at high frequencies while another experiences loss at lower frequencies and a third may experience impaired hearing at multiple frequencies. Because assisted users experience hearing loss differently, not surprisingly communication devices used by assisted users have been developed that enable a user to adjust frequency responses or tone differently to accommodate individual user preferences. In other words, the devices enable a user to increase or decrease bass, increase or decrease treble, etc.
To adjust tone, manual equalizer type controls, either mechanical or virtual on a display, have been provided on assisted user devices. In known cases an equalizer feature may include five or more independently selectable slider buttons or virtual icons (hereinafter “slider controls”), each corresponding to a different frequency within the human hearing range. Each slider control is typically arranged along a vertical slide column where vertical positions along the slide column correspond to different decibel values along a range. By setting the slider controls at different locations along the ranges, the tone of sounds generated by an assisted user's device is customized.
Where devices have controls such as equalizers for customizing tone, typically parameters are set during a phone call. For instance, while an assisted user is carrying on a conversation with a hearing user via the assisted user's device, the assisted user accesses the equalizer controls and adjusts those controls until the user perceives that a tone is optimized (e.g., that the user hears best with a set of slider control settings). After the equalizer settings are set, the settings remain set during subsequent calls unless the assisted user resets the settings during a subsequent call. While this solution can be used, the requirement to set equalizer settings during a call in order to hear the effects of the settings is burdensome as it requires the assisted user to adjust around with settings during a conversation. In many cases an assisted user may completely miss a portion of a conversation while simultaneously setting slider controls or may misperceive what was said by a hearing user.
In addition, oftentimes voice messages from a hearing user during a call may not be optimized for setting tone. To this end, a specific hearing user may have an unusual voice or may speak in a low or high volume which is out of the ordinary. Here, if an assisted user sets tone or other audio parameters using an unusual voice or under odd circumstances, the settings will likely be less than optimal during conversations with other hearing users or when the odd circumstances are not present (e.g., when a hearing user speaks in a normal volume range).
It has been recognized that many hearing impaired persons have care givers (hereafter “a proxy”; e.g., a son or daughter, a friend, a relative, etc.) that can help maintain an assisted user device contact list from a remote location and in a limited way that does not cause a sense of invasion of an assisted user's privacy. To this end, in at least some embodiments of the present invention, a web site is provided that can be used by an assisted user's proxy to update/maintain contact information on an assisted user's device. Here, each assisted user device is assigned a unique assisted user device identification number. An assisted user can give her device identification number to a local or remote proxy. For instance, an assisted user may give her device identification number to her daughter living at a location remote from the assisted user's residence (e.g., in another state). The proxy can access the website via a conventional internet browser running on any computer (e.g., the proxy's personal computer) and enter the device identification number into a field to indicate the device for which contact information is to be modified. Once the identification number has been entered, the proxy can change existing or enter new contact information in an intuitive fashion.
After entering new or changing existing contact information, the proxy can select a “sync” control (e.g., a virtual button on a display screen) to store the changed information and place the server in a waiting state to wait for an indication generated using the assisted user's device to sync information. Subsequently, once the assisted user accesses the assisted user's device, the assisted user selects a sync control (e.g., virtual button on a display screen) causing the assisted user's device to link to the system server and indicate that the assisted user desires to synchronize the server and user device contact information. If changes to the contact information exist synchronization begins. If the most recent changes to the contact information have already been synchronized with the assisted user's device, a synchronization timer simply times out.
For security purposes, in at least some embodiments, synchronization may only be enabled either while the proxy is still linked to the website or within a short time (e.g., one hour) after the proxy has selected the sync control or exited the website. In addition to changing contact list information, a proxy may also be able to change speed dial preferences, a favorites list for an assisted user or other types of information.
In at least some cases if a proxy has made changes to an assisted user's contact list or other device information and requested a sync without the assisted user also confirming a desire to sync by selecting a sync control on the assisted user's device, the changes may be stored by the server running the website to be used subsequently to attempt to sync. For instance, two days after a proxy makes changes and unsuccessfully attempts to sync, the proxy may confirm that an assisted user is available to retry a synchronizing process and the sync control selection process described above may be repeated.
In still other embodiments the system may be programmed to require both an assisted user and a proxy for the user to enter the same pin or password in order to update contact or other information on the assisted user's device. For instance, when a proxy selects a sync control (e.g., a virtual button or icon on a display), the system server may be programmed to generate a four digit pin number and present that number to the proxy. Here, when the proxy contacts the assisted user to indicate that a synchronization process should be initiated, the proxy would give the four digit pin number to the assisted user. Then, when the assisted user selects a sync control to initiate a synchronization process, the assisted user's device would query the assisted user for the four digit pin number. Upon entry of the pin number the sync process would then commence. In other cases upon selecting a sync control, the server may require the proxy to enter any four digit pin number (e.g., a number selected by the proxy) and instruct the proxy to provide the entered number to the assisted user. Here, upon the assisted user entering the pin via the user's device, synchronization would commence.
Regarding assisted user devices that include an equalizer, it has been recognized that an equalizer or other tone controllers can be set on an assisted user's device independent of a call between the assisted user and another person. To this end, a device processor can store sample voice recordings that can be played by an assisted user as the user modifies tone settings. During a setup procedure the assisted user can listen to the sample recordings with different tone settings and can select optimized settings for the particular user given the user's specific hearing impairment. Once tone settings have been optimized, the settings can be stored for subsequent use. In at least some embodiments the recordings include both male and female voices so that an assisted user can identify optimized tone settings for all types of voices. Other parameters in addition to tone may be set during similar processes including volume, etc. In addition, tone can be set by separately adjusting treble, bass or other parameters during commissioning and while listening to sample recordings.
In at least some embodiments two or more optimized tone settings may be selected for different types of voices and the user's device may then select an optimized tone setting based on characteristics of a voice received by the assisted user's device. For instance, a user may set an optimized tone setting for a typical relatively low male voice and a second optimized tone setting for a typical relatively high female voice. Then, when a call is received, an assisted user's device may modify tone setting as a function of characteristics of the voice message received by the device.
To the accomplishment of the foregoing and related ends, the invention, then, comprises the features hereinafter fully described. The following description and the annexed drawings set forth in detail certain illustrative aspects of the invention. However, these aspects are indicative of but a few of the various ways in which the principles of the invention can be employed. Other aspects, advantages and novel features of the invention will become apparent from the following detailed description of the invention when considered in conjunction with the drawings.
While the invention is susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, specific embodiments thereof have been shown by way of example in the drawings and are herein described in detail. It should be understood, however, that the description herein of specific embodiments is not intended to limit the invention to the particular forms disclosed, but on the contrary, the intention is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
The various aspects of the subject disclosure are now described with reference to the annexed drawings, wherein like reference numerals correspond to similar elements throughout the several views. It should be understood, however, that the drawings and detailed description hereafter relating thereto are not intended to limit the claimed subject matter to the particular form disclosed. Rather, the intention is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the claimed subject matter.
As used herein, the terms “component,” “system” and the like are intended to refer to a computer-related entity, either hardware, a combination of hardware and software, software, or software in execution. For example, a component may be, but is not limited to being, a process running on a processor, a processor, an object, an executable, a thread of execution, a program, and/or a computer. By way of illustration, both an application running on a computer and the computer can be a component. One or more components may reside within a process and/or thread of execution and a component may be localized on one computer and/or distributed between two or more computers or processors.
Referring now to the drawings wherein like reference numerals correspond to similar elements throughout the several view and, more specifically, referring to
Referring again to
To place a call from the assisted user's device 12 to the hearing user's device 14, an assisted user may pick up the handset 24/26 and simply dial a telephone number associated with the hearing user's device 14 using keyboard 27. During a voice communication with a hearing user, the assisted user's voice is transmitted by device 12 via line 30 to device 14. Similarly, a hearing user's voice is transmitted along line 30 to device 12 and is broadcast via the speaker 24 in the handset of device 12 to the ear of the assisted user.
When an assisted user has difficulty hearing voice messages broadcast via speaker 24 from the hearing user, the assisted user can initiate a captioning service whereby the voice messages of the hearing user are transcribed into text and presented to the assisted user via the assisted user's device 12 substantially simultaneously with broadcast of the hearing user's voice messages. To this end, referring again to
At the relay 16, the hearing user's voice messages are transcribed into text and the text is transmitted back to the assisted user's device 12 via link 28 or a third communication link and the transcribed text is presented to the assisted user via display 22. The voice to text conversion or transcription at relay 16 may be automated, partially automated or facilitated via a call assistant that listens to the hearing user's voice messages and either types or revoices or both types and revoices the voice messages to transcribe the text as known in the art.
Referring to
Referring yet again to
Referring again to
Consistent with at least some aspects of the present disclosure, one feature that may be implemented via the system shown in
Referring still to
Continuing, at block 64, a proxy receives an assisted user's device ID which is required for the proxy to enter any information into the system associated with a specific assisted user. Here, it is contemplated that each assisted user device will be assigned a unique assisted device ID number or character string (hereinafter “a device ID”) which can be used by any proxy to enter information for the assisted user. In the present example, it will be assumed that each assisted device ID will include a seven-digit serial number. In the present example, an exemplary seven-digit number for user device 12 shown in
Referring still to
Referring still to
Referring still to
Referring yet again to
Referring still to
Referring still to
Referring again to
Referring again to
Referring again to
Referring again to
In
In at least some embodiments it is contemplated that an assisted user may want to view contact and other information updates that a proxy is attempting to make to the assisted user's contact and other information on the assisted user's device prior to authorizing a synchronization. To this end, a sub process 170 that may be substituted for block 144 in
While assisted user confirmation of contact information and other types of device updating is particularly preferred to ensure that only authorized updates are synchronized, in at least some embodiments it is contemplated that one or more “trusted” proxy locations may be designated for each or at least a subset of the assisted users where the trusted proxy can initiate a synchronization update or process without requiring authorization by an assisted user. For instance, in at least some cases a customer service representative for the entity providing the proxy features described above may be a trusted proxy associated with a device (e.g., a computer) that is associated with the provider (e.g., location would be a virtual location associated with a trusted network address, URL, etc., as opposed to a geographic location or may be a geographic location in some cases). This feature would be useful by a customer service representative to assist an assisted user without requiring user confirmation.
In still other embodiments it is contemplated that an assisted user may be able to designate one or more trusted proxies (e.g., a daughter, a social worker, etc.) enabling those proxies to update the assisted user's contact and other information without assisted user authorization. In any of these cases, when an assisted user accesses the user's device, the device may be programmed to automatically link to the system server, check for changes to the contact and other information for the assisted user's device made by a trusted proxy or a proxy at the trusted location and may then update the user's device information if suitable updates are available.
At block 174, the assisted user may be able to access and view the updated contact and other information prior to storing that information on the assisted user's device in a persistent fashion. To this end, see the exemplary screen shot shown in
While assisted user confirmation of contact information and other types of device updating is particularly preferred to ensure that only authorized updates are synchronized, in at least some embodiments it is contemplated that one or more “trusted” proxy locations may be designated for each or at least a subset of the assisted users where the trusted proxy can initiate a synchronization update or process without requiring authorization by an assisted user. For instance, in at least some cases a customer service representative for the entity providing the proxy features described above may be a trusted proxy associated with a device (e.g., a computer) that is associated with the provider (e.g., location would be a virtual location associated with a trusted network address, URL, etc., as opposed to a geographic location or may be a geographic location in some cases). This feature would be useful by a customer service representative to assist an assisted user without requiring user confirmation.
In still other embodiments it is contemplated that an assisted user may be able to designate one or more trusted proxies (e.g., a daughter, a social worker, etc.) enabling those proxies to update the assisted user's contact and other information without assisted user authorization. In any of these cases, when an assisted user accesses the user's device, the device may be programmed to automatically link to the system server, check for changes to the contact and other information for the assisted user's device made by a trusted proxy or a proxy at the trusted location and may then update the user's device information if suitable updates are available.
In some embodiments the system processors may be programmed to add another level of security to ensure that only updates from trusted proxies are made to an assisted user's device information. For instance, in at least some embodiments it is contemplated that the system will require both a proxy and an assisted user to enter an identical code or pin number or word in order to initiate data synchronization. To this end see the exemplary sub-process 298 in
Referring also to
Referring to
Referring again to
In still other embodiments the assisted user may select the random pin number and provide that number to the proxy for entry, the assisted user's device may generate the random number and present it to the assisted user upon selection of a sync control so that the assisted user can provide the pin to the proxy for entry, etc. In yet other embodiments where server 65 generates the random pin, the random pin may be automatically presented to each of the assisted user and the proxy, the proxy via the proxy work station 18 and the assisted user in any fashion including text, e-mail, a voice mail message, etc.
One advantage to requiring entry of identical pin numbers by a proxy and an assisted user is that the timeout timers can be discarded. This is because the pin numbers may provide sufficient security regardless of when an assisted user commences a synchronization process relative to when the proxy updated the user's information. Thus, for instance, a proxy may update an assisted user's content and then send an e-mail to the assisted user indicating that a sync should be performed and including the four digit pin number. Two weeks later the assisted user may want to first synchronize information and may, at that time, enter the pin number to synchronize.
While some embodiments contemplate that a proxy will have to always contact an assisted user to commence a synchronization process, in other embodiments it is contemplated that the server 65 may be programmed to automatically transmit an e-mail, text, voice mail, etc., to an assisted user any time updated information is stored at the server 65. This is particularly useful in cases where a pin number or other code is associated with an update. For instance, an automated e-mail may indicate that synchronization is in order and may provide a pin number to the assisted user irrespective of whether or not the pin was provided to the proxy. In this case the assisted user would simply enter the pin using the user's device 12 to commence synchronization.
Still other embodiments are contemplated that would include both the pin number and timeout timer features for an even higher level of security in some cases.
Referring now to
Once broadcast tone has been selected by an assisted user, in at least some embodiments, the assisted user may choose to listen to a pre-recorded sample voice recording broadcast by the device speaker 24 so that the assisted user can determine whether or not the tone settings are optimized for the particular user. To this end, the screen shot in
As a sample recording is played, a bar 214 moves along an elongated recording field to indicate where along the duration of the sample recording the broadcast is at any given time. Here, if desired, the assisted user may move bar 214 to any location along the recording field and again select the play icon 212 to listen to a portion of the recording. For example, if an assisted user can easily hear a female voice that is first broadcast as part of the recording, but is having difficulty hearing a male voice presented during the second half of the recording, the assisted user may move bar 214 to approximately the midway point along the recording field and then select the play icon 212 to play only the male portion of the sample recording.
The
If an assisted user perceives that the tone is optimized after one or more broadcasts of the recorded voices, the assisted user can select an accept icon 216 to store the frequency setting within a device memory (see again
Referring to
Each one of the slider controls can be moved up or down within the decibel range illustrated to adjust the relative effect of the associated frequency on the overall tone of the broadcasted voice messages. To this end, in at least some embodiments, the display 22 may be a touch sensitive display so that an assisted user can simply touch one of the slider controls and move the slider control up and down the associated slide column. Once the slider controls are set as desired by an assisted user, in at least some embodiments, the assisted user may choose to listen to an optimal sample voice recording broadcast by the device speaker 24 in the fashion described above with respect to
If the assisted user listens to a recording and does not believe that the tone has been optimally set for the user, the assisted user can simply reposition the slider controls 202, 204, 206, 208 and 210 along the slide columns to modify the output tone and select the play icon 212 again to rehear the sample recording and personally assess whether or not the tone is optimized.
Referring now to
Referring still to
In at least some embodiments it is contemplated that an assisted user may have different tone preferences for different types of voices. For instance, an assisted user may prefer one tone setting for a male voice and another tone setting for a female voice. In some embodiments an assisted user may be able to use the tone setting tools in
In at least some embodiments it is contemplated that an assisted user may be able to customize an audiogram for one or more specific hearing users. For instance, where an assisted user routinely converses with five hearing users, in at least some embodiments the assisted user may identify a separate audiogram for each of the five hearing users which can be stored in a database with one or more phone numbers associated with the specific hearing user. For instance, while an assisted user is conversing with the assisted user's daughter, the assisted user may access the equalizer tool in
In some embodiments processor 20 may be programmed to recognize specific hearing person's voices and to select previously stored audiograms for specific hearing user's that call an assisted user. Here, voice unique audiograms may be specified and stored by an assisted user for subsequent use. This feature would enable caller specific audiograms for at least a subset of frequent callers irrespective of the phone numbers used by the callers. This feature would also enable tone preferences for multiple callers that use the same phone to call an assisted user's device. For instance, where an assisted user's daughter is married and has four kids so that six people may call the assisted user routinely using the daughter's phone, different audiograms may be stored for each of the six possible callers or for the two most frequent callers (e.g., the daughter and a grandson) with a generic audiogram used when any of the other four callers call.
While the system is described above as one where an assisted user's contact and other information is stored in a memory maintained on an assisted user's device, in other embodiments it is contemplated that an assisted user's contact and other information may be stored somewhere else such as, for instance, in a database associated with the system server or some other remote server. In this case, if a proxy attempts to update or change contact information a process similar to the process described above would be performed to seek and obtain confirmation to update from an assisted user and then the data in the server would be updated accordingly.
The particular embodiments disclosed above are illustrative only, as the invention may be modified and practiced in different but equivalent manners apparent to those skilled in the art having the benefit of the teachings herein. For example, while the system described above does not allow a proxy to indicate to an assisted user's device when information is available for updating the user's device information, in other embodiments once a proxy has indicated that update data is ready to be synchronized with an assisted user's device, the proxy may transmit a sync request to an assisted user's device. In this case the sync control option may only be provided on the assisted user's device within a time out period after a proxy has requested synchronization. In this case the assisted user may select the sync control icon to commence synchronization as described above. Where the sync control is not selected within the time out period, the sync control may be removed from the assisted user's device.
In at least some cases it is contemplated that a “No sync” control may also be presented to an assisted user via a virtual control icon suitably labelled. In these cases, if the no sync icon is selected, a no sync signal may be sent to the server causing the server to forego the synchronization process.
Furthermore, no limitations are intended to the details of construction or design herein shown, other than as described in the claims below. It is therefore evident that the particular embodiments disclosed above may be altered or modified and all such variations are considered within the scope and spirit of the invention. Accordingly, the protection sought herein is as set forth in the claims below.
Thus, the invention is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the following appended claims.
To apprise the public of the scope of this invention, the following claims are made:
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/030,580, filed on Jul. 9, 2018, which is a division of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/573,085, filed on Dec. 17, 2014, and issued Aug. 14, 2018, as U.S. Pat. No. 10,051,120, which claims the benefit of priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/918,817, filed on Dec. 20, 2013, all of which are entitled “COMMUNICATION DEVICE AND METHODS FOR USE BY HEARING IMPAIRED,” and all of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5392343 | Davitt et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5463665 | Millios et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5671267 | August et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5737389 | Allen | Apr 1998 | A |
6072860 | Kek et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6075842 | Engelke et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6212496 | Campbell et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6418196 | Brlenic et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6430270 | Cannon et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6603835 | Engelke et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6704421 | Kitamura | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6944474 | Rader et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7027569 | Price | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7177417 | Michaelis | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7181297 | Pluvinage et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7190975 | Rho | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7415120 | Vaudrey et al. | Aug 2008 | B1 |
7933587 | Swan | Apr 2011 | B1 |
8284960 | Vaudrey et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8621025 | Ridgard | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8738072 | Messerian | May 2014 | B1 |
8917892 | Poe et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
9628621 | van Rensburg | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9774674 | Gailloux et al. | Sep 2017 | B1 |
10051120 | Engelke | Aug 2018 | B2 |
10298753 | Engelke | May 2019 | B1 |
10469660 | Engelke et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10491746 | Engelke et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10587751 | Engelke et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
20010005825 | Engelke et al. | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20020040369 | Multer | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020085685 | Engelke et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020193076 | Rogers et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030045329 | Kinoshita | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030063731 | Woodring | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030097262 | Nelson | May 2003 | A1 |
20030182000 | Muesch et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20050063520 | Michaelis | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050129185 | McClelland et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050232169 | McLaughlin et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050259641 | Beninato | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050260985 | Rader et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20070047702 | Newell et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20090187956 | Sommer | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090245539 | Vaudrey et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100016003 | Shapiro | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100220358 | Beninato et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110093272 | Isobe et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110269424 | Multer | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120009916 | Prikowitsch | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120076009 | Pasko | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120140937 | Poe et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120282976 | Suhami | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130282377 | Huh et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140153705 | Moore et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140194775 | Van Hasselt et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140333957 | Beninato et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150081860 | Kuehnel et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150120607 | Ramsunder et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150134604 | Efrati | May 2015 | A1 |
20150281853 | Eisner et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150320344 | Van Hasselt et al. | Nov 2015 | A9 |
20160192093 | Blarney et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20170027522 | Van Hasselt et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170070611 | Silver | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170237854 | Koum et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20180020346 | Li | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180198920 | Kahn | Jul 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
9750222 | Dec 1997 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Petition for Inter Partes Review for U.S. Pat. No. 10,469,660, CaptionCall, LLC v. Ultratec, Inc., United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Jul. 1, 2020, 68 pages. |
Declaration of Benedict J. Occhiogrosso for U.S. Pat. No. 10,469,660, CaptionCall, LLC v. Ultratec, Inc., United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Jun. 23, 2020, 113 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/562,795 Provisional Application to McLaughlin et al., Apr. 16, 2004, 126 pages. |
Blackberry, RIM Introduces New Color BlackBerry Handheld for CDMA2000 1X Wireless Networks, BlackBerry Press Release, Mar. 22, 2004, 2 pages. |
Blackberry Wireless Handheld User Guide, 7750, Mar. 16, 2004, 144 pages. |
Federal Communications Commission, Telecommunication Relay Services and Speech-to-Speech Services for Individuals With Hearing and Speech Disabilities, 68 Fed. Reg. 50973-50978 (Aug. 25, 2003). |
Phonedb, RIM BlackBerry 7750 Device Specs, Copyright 2006-2020 PhoneDB, 6 pages. |
Phonesdata, Nokia 6620 Specs, Review, Opinions, Comparisons, Copyright 2020, 9 pages. |
Sundgot, Nokia Unveils the 6600, InfoSync World, Jun. 16, 2003, 2 pages. |
Wikipedia, Dell Axim, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dell_Axim, Last Edited on Feb. 23, 2020, 4 pages. |
Wikipedia, Palm Tungsten, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palm_Tungsten, Last Edited on Oct. 6, 2019, 10 pages. |
Final Written Decision, U.S. Pat. No. 9,131,045, Case IPR2015-01889, CaptionCall, LLC v. Ultratec, Inc., United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Apr. 11, 2017, 118 pages. |
Judgment, U.S. Pat. No. 7,881,441, Case IPR2015-01886, CaptionCall, LLC v. Ultratec, Inc., United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Jun. 9, 2016, 4 pages. |
Petition for Inter Partes Review for U.S. Pat. No. 10,491,746, CaptionCall, LLCv. Ultratec, Inc., United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Jul. 1, 2020, 61 pages. |
Declaration of Benedict J. Occhiogrosso for U.S. Pat. No. 10,491,746, CaptionCall, LLCv. Ultratec, Inc., United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Jun. 23, 2020, 79 pages. |
Arlinger, Negative Consequences of Uncorrected Hearing Loss—A Review, International Journal of Audiology, 2003, 42:2S17-2S20. |
Petition for Inter Partes Review for U.S. Pat. No. 10,587,751, CaptionCall, LLC v. Ultratec, Inc., United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Jul. 1, 2020, 64 pages. |
Declaration of Benedict J. Occhiogrosso for U.S. Pat. No. 10,587,751, CaptionCall, LLC v. Ultratec, Inc., United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Jun. 23, 2020, 106 pages. |
Curtis et al., Doctor-Patient Communication on the Telephone, Can Fam Physician, 1989, 35:123-128. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Decision Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review, CaptionCall LLC v. Ultratec Inc., Case IPR2020-01215, U.S. Pat. No. 10,469,660, Jan. 27, 2021, 24 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Petitioner's Request for Rehearing Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. 42.71(d), CaptionCall LLC v. Ultratec Inc., Case IPR2020-01215, U.S. Pat. No. 10,469,660, Feb. 18, 2021, 19 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190238679 A1 | Aug 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61918817 | Dec 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14573085 | Dec 2014 | US |
Child | 16030580 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16030580 | Jul 2018 | US |
Child | 16379381 | US |