The present disclosure generally relates to wireless communications, in particular, to a communication receiving apparatus and a method for detecting transmit symbols.
For a digital modulation communications system, the transmitter encodes information bits into transmit symbols, usually with forward error correction coding, and further modulates the transmit symbols into waveform to travel through the physical media (or channel) of the communication link to arrive at the receiver side. The receiver samples the incoming waveform and employs various digital receiver schemes to recover the information bits (or, equivalently, the transmit symbols) from the receiving waveform under channel and noise effects.
One of the challenging tasks for implementing a robust receiver lies in the design of a symbol detector to optimally detect the transmit symbols with a maximum likelihood criterion. The design of a maximum likelihood symbol detector is particularly challenging for a Multiple Input Multiple Output (MIMO) communications system since it involves multi-dimensional search with an exponential growth complexity when the number of input and/or output increases.
Accordingly, the present disclosure is directed to a communication receiving apparatus and a method for detecting transmit symbols, to perform optimal maximum likelihood symbol detector that is applicable to any digitally modulated communications systems, including but not limited to MIMO communications systems.
The method for detecting transmit symbols of the present disclosure, which is adapted for a communication receiving apparatus, includes the following steps. Received signal and channel state information corresponding to the received signal are obtained. A modified Least-Square (LS) estimation according to the received signal and the channel state information is calculated. The modified LS estimation is defined as
subject to a linearly-constrained equation CHw=x−xls, where C is a constraint matrix which is a matrix multiplication of a matrix A and the inverse of the channel state information matrix H, w is a variable vector, x is a vector of transmit symbols, and xls is a LS solution according to the received signal and the channel state information. The transmit symbol vector is determined according to the solution of the modified LS estimation.
The communication receiving apparatus of the present disclosure includes a receiving circuit and a symbol detector. The receiving circuit receives signal. The symbol detector is coupled to the receiving circuit and configured for performing the following steps. Obtaining received signal and channel state information corresponding to the received signal. Calculating a modified LS estimation according to the received signal and the channel state information. The modified LS estimation is defined as
subject to a linearly-constrained equation CHw=x−xls, C is a constraint matrix which is a matrix multiplication of a matrix A and the inverse of the channel state information matrix H, w is a variable vector, x is a vector of transmit symbols, and xls is a LS solution according to the received signal and the channel state information. Determining the transmit symbol vector according to a solution of the modified LS estimation.
Accordingly, the disclosure reformulates the maximum likelihood problem as the modified LS estimation which is a linearly constrained minimization problem. Under this linearly constrained minimization framework, the embodiments of the disclosure utilize a successive linear constraint exchange scheme that formulates a sequence of linearly constrained minimization sub-problems by selecting a reduced set of linear constraints from the full set of M constraints and by assigning proper constraint values to these selected constraints to allow the solutions to these sub-problems, combined with certain quantization and mapping operations, to converge to the optimal maximum likelihood estimate of the transmit symbol vector x at the receiver side.
The accompanying drawings are included to provide a further understanding of the disclosure, and are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification. The drawings illustrate embodiments of the disclosure and, together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the disclosure.
Reference will now be made in detail to the present preferred embodiments of the disclosure, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. Wherever possible, the same reference numbers are used in the drawings and the description to refer to the same or like parts.
The communication receiving apparatus 1 in this disclosure could represent various embodiments which for example could include but not limited to a mobile station, an advanced mobile station (AMS), a server, a client, a desktop computer, a laptop computer, a network computer, a workstation, a personal digital assistant (PDA), a tablet personal computer (PC), a scanner, a telephone device, a pager, a camera, a television, a hand-held video game device, a musical device, a wireless sensor, and so like. In some applications, the communication receiving apparatus 1 may be a fixed computing device operating in a mobile environment, such as a bus, train, an airplane, a boat, a car, and so forth.
The receiving circuit 10 receives signals wirelessly via antennas and performs operations such as sampling, low noise amplifying, impedance matching, frequency mixing, down frequency conversion, filtering, amplifying, and so like. The A/D converters 11 are configured to convert from an analog signal format to a digital signal format during signal processing. The digital front-end processing circuit 12 is configured to perform digital base baseband signal front-end processing such as automatic gain control, carrier and timing synchronization, etc.
The functions of the symbol detector 13 could be implemented by using programmable units such as a micro-processor, a micro-controller, a DSP chips, FPGA, etc. The functions of the processing module 216 may also be implemented with separate electronic devices or ICs, and the functions performed by the symbol detector 13 may be implemented within the domain of either hardware or software. The symbol detector 13 is configured to estimate M transmit symbols {x1, x2, . . . , xM} from N digital receiving samples {y1, y2, . . . , yN} at every symbol period of the communication system, where M and N are positive integers.
Referring to
In order to facilitate understanding of the operation process of the present embodiment, several embodiments will be provided below for describing a method for detecting transmit symbols of the disclosure. The method of the present embodiment is applicable to each element of the communication receiving apparatus 1 illustrated in
y=Hx+n (1)
where the N×1 vector
denotes the N receiving samples, the M×1 vector
denotes the M transmit symbols, the N×N matrix
denotes the channel state information and the N×1 vector
denotes the receiver additive noise. For generality, all these vectors and matrices are assumed complex-valued.
After the receipt of the received signal and the channel state information, the symbol detector 13 calculates a modified LS estimation according to the received signal and the channel state information (Step S320). Specifically, in a typical communications system, each transmit symbol is selected from a pre-designated set of complex-valued, discrete points, termed the symbol constellation. For example, the Quadrature and Amplitude Modulation (QAM) defines transmit symbols from a rectangular grid where QAM-16 modulation contains 16 constellation points, QAM-64 contains 64 constellation points, so on and so forth. This invention uses the notation, Ω, to denote the set of the constellation points in an underlining communications system.
Given the receiving sample vector y and a proper estimation of the channel state information matrix H through training sequences, the symbol detector 13 is designed to search for the transmit symbol vector x over all possible constellation points, and the corresponding optimization problem is defined as:
where ∥⋅∥2 denotes the 2-norm of the enclosed operand. As each element of the symbol vector x is constrained to be selected from discrete points on the symbol constellation map, the solution to this maximum likelihood detector is non-trivial, especially when M is large.
The respective least-squares problem can be defined by removing the requirement for the elements of x to be discrete points on the symbol constellation map:
For this least-squares problem, the optimal LS solution is well-known and has a closed-form expression as:
x
ls=(HHH)−1HHy (8)
where HH denotes the Hermitian transpose of H. Without loss of generality, the matrix HHH is assumed invertible and well-conditioned in this invention as the use of “diagonal loading” technique by adding a small positive number to the diagonal elements of HHH can be practically applied to precondition the HHH matrix to avoid ill-conditioned issue.
The simplest approximation to the maximum likelihood solution is to “quantize” each element of xls to the nearest (measured by Euclidean distance) discrete points on the symbol constellation map:
{circumflex over (x)}
ls
=Q[x
ls] (9)
where Q[⋅] denotes the element-wise quantization of the enclosed vector to the nearest constellation point. When M>1, the “quantized” least-squares solution, {circumflex over (x)}ls rarely provides a satisfactory solution compared to the true maximum likelihood optimal solution for detecting the transmit symbols from the receiving samples corrupted by the channel and noise effect. Hence, there is a practical need to design a true maximum likelihood optimized symbol detector in a communications system, and this task is non-trivial, especially for a MIMO communications system.
This disclosure reformulates the maximum likelihood problem by including the un-quantized least-squares solution xls to the minimization objective function as:
which can be derived by use of the following property for the least-squares solution:
H
H(y−Hxls)=0 (11)
Note that the first term in the above reformulated maximum likelihood problem is a constant with respect to the symbol vector x and can be removed from the minimization objective function. Hence, the maximum likelihood problem can be further reformulated as:
Let C be an arbitrary M×M unitary matrix, the maximum likelihood problem can now be readily transformed into a linearly constrained minimization problem which is referred as the modified LS estimation in the disclosure:
subject to M linear constraints given by:
C
H
w=f (14)
where w is a variable vector,
A=HC
H (15)
denotes a linear equation, and
f=x−x
ls (16)
and the M elements of the symbol vector x belong to the discrete constellation points:
{xmϵΩ,m=1,2, . . . ,M} (17)
Note that the transmit symbol vector x and the least-squares solution xls now appears in the form of the constraint values f in the linear constraint specification for this reformulated maximum likelihood problem. In this disclosure, the choice of the constraint matrix C is not unique and is only required to be unitary, i.e., CH=C−1. C is a matrix multiplication of a matrix A and the inverse of the channel state information matrix H. For example, some practically useful choices of the constraint matrix C can be as simple as the identify matrix, I, or an unitary matrix derived from the Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) of H or the QR decomposition of HH:
The above linear constraint formulation defines a full set of M linear constraints over the M-dimensional space with the corresponding constraint values specified by the differences of the transmit symbol vector x and the least-squares solution xls, denoted by the vector f. Under this linear constraint minimization framework, this disclosure utilizes a successive linear constraint exchange scheme that formulates a sequence of linearly constrained minimization sub-problems by selecting a reduced set of linear constraints from the full set of M constraints and by assigning proper constraint values to these selected constraints to allow the solutions to these sub-problems, combined with certain quantization and mapping operations, to converge to the modified LS estimation of the transmit symbol vector x at the communication receiving apparatus 1, so as to determine the transmit symbol vector according to the solution of the modified LS estimation (Step S330).
Specifically, the APU 131 constructs iteratively the vector of the transmit symbol with M dimensions by giving an i-dimensional seed symbol vector, where the i-dimensional seed symbol vector is determined from a previous iteration, and i is a positive integer less than M. Referring to
x
I
=x(Ii) (19)
x
I
=x(IM-i) (20)
I
i
Y I
M-i={1,2, . . . ,M} (21)
I
i
I I
M-i=ø (22)
where Ii contains indices and IM-i contains (M−i) indices with i selected as an integer between 1 and M. The order of the indices in these two index sets has no significance in deriving the symbol detector 13 and can be assumed in ascending order without loss of generality. For example, for M=8, i=3 and the M-dimensional symbol vector given by:
When the two mutually exclusive index sets are chosen as Ii={1,3,5} and IM-i={2,4,6,8}, the two reduced dimensional symbol vectors are given by:
With this partition, the augmentizer 135 constructs an M-dimensional symbol vector x from a given i-dimensional symbol vector xI
subject to i linear constraints on w, given by:
C
I
H
w=x
I
−x
ls,I
(27)
where
C
I
=C(:,Ii) (28)
consists of the i columns of constraint matrix C indexed by Ii and
x
ls,I
=x
ls(Ii) (29)
consists of the i elements of xls indexed by Ii.
A closed-form solution for the optimal w to this modified LS estimation would be given by:
w
I
=C
I
f
I
−C
I
(CI
where
f
I
=x
I
−x
ls,I
(31)
and
C
I
=C(:,IM-i) (32)
contains the (M−i) columns of constraint matrix C indexed by IM-i. Define an (M−i)-dimensional constraint symbol vector uI
u
I
=C
I
H
w
I
w
I
+x
ls,I
=−(CI
where
x
ls,I
=x
ls(IM-i) (34)
contains the (M−i) elements of xls indexed by IM-i. The (M−i)-dimensional seed complementary symbol vector xI
x
I
=Q└u
I
┘ (35)
where a quantizer 139 of augmentizer 135 would perform the quantization of each element of the enclosed vector to the nearest constellation point 402 with a pre-defined constellation map 401. Note that the constellation map 401 of 16-QAM is merely an example for description, and the constellation map may be modified according to QAM-64, Quadrature Phase Shift Keying (QPSK), or other modulations in other embodiments. In addition, when the augmentizer 135 computes CI
Then, the given i-dimensional seed symbol vector xI
As illustrated in
Then, the M-dimensional symbol vector x would be mapped to its neighboring symbol vector of the same dimension, and this procedure is donated by
A systematic procedure illustrated in
Referring to
On the basis of the inventive spirit of the above embodiment, the symbol detector 13 could be modified. Referring to
x(0)=Q[xls] (36).
In other words, the M-dimensional seed symbol vector is a quantized vector of the LS solution in the first iteration. Given H and y, the computation of this initial estimate is relatively simple and straightforward. Any other choices of initial estimate are also applicable to this search procedure in the embodiment of this disclosure.
Specifically, the symbol detector 63 starts with x(n)=x(0) and uses the vector-to-scalar splitter 631 to splitting the M elements of x(n) into M branches where each branch is fired up with the corresponding element of x(n), to form M 1-dimensional seed symbols. For the m-th branch, the 1-dimensional symbol vector xm(n) is used to fire up the maximum likelihood estimate block 632 to generate the M-dimensional symbol vector xm(n+1). The Best Estimate Selection block 633 is then applied to select the “best” estimate out of {xm(n+1), m=1, 2, . . . , M} from the M branches and the resulting best estimate is denoted by x(n+1). A symbol vector is deemed “better” than another symbol vector provided that the error (or objective) function, ∥H(x−xls)∥22, associated with this symbol vector is smaller. The best estimate for this iteration, x(n+1), is compared to that for the last iteration, x(n) (block 634). If it is better, a better estimate has been found and x(n) is replaced by x(n+1) (block 635) to start another iteration of search, it means the i-dimensional seed symbol vector is set as one of the M 1-dimensional seed symbols for M branch estimations, and the M-dimensional seed symbol vector is an estimated result of a previous iteration in other iterations. Otherwise, the search procedure terminates with the “best” estimated result selected as x(n) (block 636), it means the i-dimensional seed symbol vector remains the same.
In one embodiment of this disclosure, the block 632 of
I
i+1
(l)
={I
i
,I
M-i(l)} (37)
and
for l=1, 2, . . . , M−i. Each one of these (Ii+1(l),xi+1(l)) is fed into one APU 733 to compute for a pivoting symbol vector
Having described one embodiment of this disclosure, there are various modifications that can be made without departing from the scope of the disclosure.
Several modification schemes that are applicable for deriving additional embodiments of this disclosure are provided below.
The APU 131 as shown in
On the other hand, referring to
In addition, for each iteration n in the embodiment of
Furthermore, for each iteration n in the embodiment of
Besides, in the embodiment of
Furthermore, in the embodiment of
It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variations can be made to the structure of the present disclosure without departing from the scope or spirit of the disclosure. In view of the foregoing, it is intended that the present disclosure cover modifications and variations of this disclosure provided they fall within the scope of the following claims and their equivalents.
This application is a continuation-in-part application of and claims the priority benefit of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/179,981, filed on Jun. 11, 2016, now pending, which claims the priority benefit of U.S. provisional application Ser. No. 62/175,451, filed on Jun. 15, 2015. The entirety of each of the above-mentioned patent applications is hereby incorporated by reference herein and made a part of this specification.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62175451 | Jun 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15179981 | Jun 2016 | US |
Child | 15903053 | US |