Communication with a downhole tool

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6550538
  • Patent Number
    6,550,538
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, November 21, 2000
    23 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 22, 2003
    21 years ago
Abstract
A system that is usable with a subterranean well includes a downhole assembly and an apparatus. The downhole assembly is adapted to respond to a command that is encoded in a stimulus that is communicated downhole. The apparatus is adapted to change a pressure of a gas in communication with the well to generate the stimulus.
Description




BACKGROUND




The invention generally relates to communicating with a downhole tool.




A perforating gun may be used to form tunnels in a subterranean formation for purposes of enhancing production from the formation. To accomplish this, the perforating gun typically has shaped charges that fire in response to a detonation wave propagating along a detonating cord. In this manner, the perforating gun may be lowered downhole via a tubular string (for example) until the perforating gun is at a desired depth. Some action is then taken to cause a downhole firing head to initiate the detonation wave to fire the perforating gun.




For example, one technique to cause the firing head to initiate the detonation wave involves communicating with the firing head via pressure changes that propagate through a hydrostatic column of liquid that extends from a region near the firing head to the surface of the well. In this manner, the firing head may be electrically coupled to a pressure sensor or strain gauge to detect changes in a pressure of the column of liquid near the firing head. Thus, due to this arrangement, pressure may be selectively applied to the column of liquid at the surface of the well to encode a command (a fire command, for example) for the firing head, and the resulting pressure changes that are introduced to the liquid at the surface of the well propagate downhole to the sensor. The firing head may then decode the command and take the appropriate action.




However, the above-described technique is used when the column of liquid extends to the surface of the well. The liquid may extend to the surface in overbalanced or underbalanced wells. In this manner, in overbalanced wells, the column of liquid ensures that the pressure that is exerted by the hydrostatic column of liquid near the region of perforation overcomes the pressure that is exerted by the formation once perforation occurs. The column may or may not extend to the surface of the well to establish this condition. In contrast to an overbalanced well, an underbalanced well is created to maximize the inflow of well fluid from the formation by creating, as its name implies, an underbalanced condition in which the formation pressure overcomes the pressure that is established by the column of hydrostatic liquid. The hydrostatic liquid for an underbalanced well may or may not extend to the surface of the well.




Therefore, for both underbalanced and overbalanced wells, the column of hydrostatic fluid may not extend to the surface of the well. For these cases, because the liquid does not extend to the surface of the well, the above-described technique of communicating by selectively applying pressure to the liquid at the surface of the well may not be used.




Therefore, conventionally other techniques are used to communicate commands to the firing head in an underbalanced well. For example, the firing head may respond to a bar that is dropped from the surface of the well. In this manner, the bar strikes the firing head to initiate a detonation wave on the detonating cord. It is noted that this technique may not be used in horizontal wells.




Another technique to communicate with the firing head involves the use of an expensive and complex pump system at the surface of the well to completely fill the central passageway of the string with a gas (Nitrogen, for example) to the point that the pressure is sufficient to activate the firing head. The pressurization is necessary to overcome a mechanical barrier that is associated with the firing head. For example, the pressure in the string may be increased until it reaches an absolute pressure and breaks the mechanical barrier. As an example, this mechanical barrier may be established by a shear pin that shears when the predetermined pressure differential threshold is overcome. Once the mechanical barrier is overcome, the firing head fires the perforating gun. For purposes of establishing a safety margin, the pressure differential typically must substantially exceed the nominal manufacturer-specified threshold of the mechanical barrier. Therefore, the pump system at the surface of the well must supply a large volume of gas downhole to fill the string and establish the required pressure.




The same difficulties exist in communicating with downhole tools (packers, for example) other than firing heads in an underbalanced well. Thus, there is a continuing need for an arrangement to address one or more of the problems that are stated above.




SUMMARY




In an embodiment of the invention, a system that is usable with a subterranean well includes a downhole assembly and an apparatus. The downhole assembly is adapted to respond to a command that is encoded in a stimulus that is communicated downhole. The apparatus is adapted to change a pressure of a gas in communication with the well to generate the stimulus.




In another embodiment of the invention, a method that is usable with a subterranean well includes establishing a gas layer above a downhole assembly and selectively pressurizing the gas layer to generate a stimulus to propagate through the gas layer to the downhole assembly. The pressurization of the gas layer is controlled to encode a command for the downhole assembly in the stimulus.




In yet another embodiment of the invention, a method that is usable with a subterranean well includes receiving a stimulus downhole. The stimulus has a first pressure signature, and the first pressure signature is compared to a second pressure signature to determine an error between the first and second pressure signatures. The method includes determining whether the first pressure signature indicates a command based on the error.




Advantages and other features of the invention will become apparent from the following description, drawing and claims.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING





FIG. 1

is schematic diagram of a subterranean well according to an embodiment of the invention.





FIG. 2

is a schematic diagram of the well depicting the gas and liquid layers present in the well according to an embodiment of the invention.





FIG. 3

is a plot of a pressure detected by a downhole pressure sensor of a tubular string of the well according to an embodiment of the invention.





FIG. 4

is a more detailed plot of pressure pulses detected by the downhole pressure sensor according to an embodiment of the invention.





FIG. 5

is a schematic diagram of circuitry of the tubular string according to an embodiment of the invention.





FIGS. 6 and 7

are flow diagrams depicting routines to verify a pressure pulse signature according to different embodiments of the invention.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION




Referring to

FIG. 1

, an embodiment 5 of a system for a subterranean well includes a tubular string


20


that extends from a surface of the well downhole for purposes of performing perforating and/or testing operations (as examples) in the well. For example, the string


20


may include a perforating gun


46


that is used to form perforation tunnels in the formation(s) that surround the perforating gun


46


. In this manner, as described herein, a stimulus (a stimulus that encodes a fire command, for example) may be communicated downhole to a downhole assembly (an assembly that includes a firing head


47


, a pressure sensor


34


and a perforating gun


46


, as an example) to send a command to the downhole assembly. For example, the command may be a firing command to instruct the firing head


47


to fire the perforating gun


46


.




In some embodiments of the invention, the well may be underbalanced to enhance the inflow of well fluid from the formation after perforation occurs. However; a possible constraint of underbalanced perforating is that the hydrostatic column of liquid that stands in the central passageway of the tubing


20


prior to perforation must establish downhole pressure that is less than the pressure that is exerted by the formation once perforation occurs. Referring to

FIG. 2

, as result of this constraint, in some embodiments of the invention, the central passsageway of the tubing


20


contains two layers: a lower liquid layer


132


that does not reach the surface of the well and an upper gas layer


130


that extends from the liquid layer


132


to the surface of the well. It is noted that the liquid


132


and gas


130


layers may also be present in an overbalanced well, and the techniques and arrangements described herein also apply to overbalanced wells.




Even though the liquid layer


132


does not extend to the surface of the well, for purposes of communicating commands downhole (to a downhole tool, such as the firing head


47


), the system


5


forms pressure pulses in the gas layer


130


. These pressure pulses propagate through the liquid layer


132


to a downhole pressure sensor


34


that detects the pulses. As described below, a downhole tool, such as the firing head


47


, may be coupled to the pressure sensor to extract and respond to a command from these pressure pulses. As other examples, the downhole tool may include valve, a mechanical assembly or an electrical assembly that is responsive to respond to a command from the pressure pulses.




Alternatively, in some embodiments of the invention, the central passageway of the tubing


20


may not include any liquid, but may instead be filled entirely with gas. Also, in some embodiments of the invention, the well may be placed in an overbalanced condition without the liquid extending to the surface of the well.




Referring back to

FIG. 1

, as an example, the gas


130


and liquid


132


(see

FIG. 2

) layers may be formed in the following manner. A ball valve


32


that controls communication through a packer


40


of the string


20


may be left opened while the string


20


is run downhole to a certain depth, a depth that establishes the desired level of liquid in the central passageway of the string


20


. After reaching this depth, the ball valve


32


is closed, and the string


20


is run downhole until the perforating gun


46


is placed at the appropriate position. Alternatively, the string


20


may be run downhole with the ball valve


32


closed. After the string


20


has been run downhole, a liquid pump


8


at the surface of the well may then be used to introduce liquid into the central passageway of the tubular string


20


.




In some embodiments of the invention, to achieve an underbalanced condition, the liquid in the central passageway of the tubing


20


and in the annulus of the well does not extend to the surface of the well, as the weight of this liquid controls the pressure downhole. As a result, the string


20


may be divided into two parts: a lower part


30


that contains the layer


132


of liquid (see also

FIG. 2

) and an upper part


25


that contains the layer


130


of gas (see also FIG.


2


). A similar division of liquid and gas may exist in the annulus


23


. It is noted that the gas be, as an example, air at atmospheric or another pressure. Alternatively, the gas may be Nitrogen, as another example. Other gases may be used.




Therefore, conventional techniques may not be used to communicate stimuli through the liquid in the annulus of the well or the liquid in the central passageway of the tubular string


20


for purposes of encoding commands to actuate downhole tools of the tubular string


20


. However, unlike these conventional arrangements, the system


5


includes containers


10


(bottles, for example) of gas that are located at the surface of the well and are used to generate pressure pulses in the gas layer


130


. These pressure pulses, in turn, propagate downhole to the pressure sensor


34


. As examples, the gas in the containers


10


may be an inert gas, such as Nitrogen gas, and may even be air, for example, that is held under pressure inside the containers


10


. As an example, each container


10


may have a capacity of about 305 standard cubic feet (scf), although other sized containers and thus, other capacities are possible.




In the context of this application, the term “liquid” may refer to a liquid of a primary composition and may also refer to a mixture of such liquids. The liquid layer may include dissolved gas but is primarily formed from liquid. The term “gas” may refer to a gas of a primary composition and may also refer to a mixture of such gases. The gas layer may include condensed liquid but is primarily formed from gas.




In some embodiments of the invention, each container


10


has an output nozzle that is connected via an associated hose


12


to a different inlet port of a gas manifold.


14


. The inlet ports of the manifold


14


may include check valves


13


to prevent backflow of gas or well fluids into the containers


10


. These check valves


13


, in some embodiments of the invention, include flow restrictors to regulate the flow of gas out of the gas manifold


14


. The flow restrictors and the check valves


13


may either be separate devices or combined into one apparatus, depending on the particular embodiment of the invention. An outlet port


50


of the manifold


14


is connected to a hose


16


that extends to the inlet port of a valve


18


that controls when the gas layer


130


is pressurized, as the outlet port of the valve


18


is in communication with the central passageway of the tubular string


20


. It is noted that the outlet nozzles of the containers


10


are left open, as communication between the containers


10


and the central passageway of the tubular string


20


is controlled by the valve


18


. Another conduit


52


establishes communication between an inlet port of a valve


19


that controls communication between the central passageway of the tubular string


20


and a vent


54


.




Due to this arrangement, a pressure pulse that encodes all or part of a command for a downhole tool may be communicated downhole in the following manner. First, the valve


18


is opened to dump gas from the containers


10


into the central passageway of the tubular string


10


to introduce an increase in the pressure in the gas layer


130


, as the volume of the gas layer


130


does not substantially change. This increase in pressure forms the beginning of a pressure pulse and propagates through the gas


130


(

FIG. 2

) and liquid


132


(

FIG. 2

) layers to the pressure sensor


34


. After a predetermined amount of time, the valve


18


is then closed and the valve


19


is opened to vent pressure from the gas layer


130


to form the end of the pressure pulse. In this manner, this venting produces a pressure drop that propagates downhole through the liquid layer


132


to the sensor


34


. The opening and closing of the valves


18


and


19


may be done manually, automatically (via computer-controlled valves, for example), or may be accomplished via a combination of manual and automatic control.




It is noted that each pressure pulse that is generated using the gas containers


10


may be relatively small (35 pounds per square inch (p.s.i.), for example), as compared to the total pressure (5000 p.s.i., for example) that typically is present at the sensor


34


due to the weight of the liquid layer


132


. The minimum number of bottles that are required to generate a 35 p.s.i. pulse (as an example) may be given by the following equation:







N
=


C
·
13.37

B


,










where “N” represents the number of gas containers


10


(rounded up), “C” represents the air volume (in barrels (bbls)) of the gas layer


130


and “B” is the bottle capacity in standard cubic feet (scf). Other amplitudes for the pressure pulses are possible. For example, in some embodiments of the invention, the amplitude of each pressure pulse may be near or less than 500 p.s.i and preferably near or less than 300 p.s.i.




It is possible, in some embodiments of the invention, that a gas layer does not exist in the central passageway of the string


20


or in the annulus. Instead, the gas layer may be formed entirely in the hose


16


that extends to the manifold


14


.




In some embodiments of the invention, a command for a downhole tool (such as the firing head


47


or the packer


40


, as examples) may be communicated downhole by a sequence of more than one pressure pulse. As an example,

FIG. 3

depicts a waveform of a pressure (called P) that is detected by the downhole pressure sensor


34


beginning at a time T


0


after the liquid layer


132


is established. As shown, the pressure P has a pressure level P


B


at time T


0


a pressure level that establishes a baseline pressure for pressure pulses


100


that are generated by the technique described herein.




A particular command may be represented by a sequence of more than one pressure pulse


100


. For example, as depicted in

FIG. 3

, two successive pressure pulses


100


may appear in a sequence


110


that indicates a command for instructing the firing head


47


to fire the perforating gun


46


, as an example.




It is noted that besides initiating the firing of a perforating gun, the pulses


100


may be used for other purposes, such as the communication of commands to set the packer


40


, control operation of a chemical cutting tool, or operate a valve, as just a few examples.





FIG. 4

depicts the signatures of exemplary pressure pulses


100


in more detail. In this manner, when the valve


18


is opened (and the valve


19


is closed), the dumping of the gas into the gas layer


130


increases the pressure of the gas layer


130


exponentially as long as the valve


18


remains open. Although the liquid layer


132


may introduce a propagation delay, this exponential rise in the pressure P is experienced by the sensor


34


beginning at time T


2


and extending until time T


3


. The valve


18


is then closed and the valve


19


is opened to cause a pressure release that propagates to the sensor


34


at time T


3


and causes the pressure P increase to decrease until the pressure P reaches the baseline pressure P


B


at time T


4


. Successive pulses


100


of the same signature


110


may be separated in time by a predetermined interval of time (called T


i


).




Referring to

FIG. 5

, in some embodiments of the invention, the tubular string


20


may, include an electronics module


44


(see also

FIG. 1

) that may be associated with or part of the tool to be controlled (such as the firing head


47


, for example) and is electrically coupled to the downhole pressure sensor


34


. In some embodiments of the invention, the electronics module


44


includes a microprocessor


200


that is coupled via a bus


208


to a non-volatile memory


202


(a read only memory (ROM), for example) and a random access memory (RAM)


210


. Also coupled to the bus


208


are an analog-to-digital (A/D) converter


222


and a firing head interface


224


(as an example). The non-volatile memory


202


stores instructions that form a program


204


that, when executed by the microprocessor


200


, causes the microprocessor


200


to detect the pulses,


100


and recognize sequences of pulses that indicate commands. The non-volatile memory


202


may also store signature data


206


that indicates the appropriate signature for the pressure pulses


100


and is used by the microprocessor


200


to verify the detection of each pressure pulse


100


, as described below.




The A/D converter


222


is coupled to a sample and hold (S/H) circuit


220


that receives an analog signal from the pressure sensor


34


indicative of the sensed pressure. The S/H circuit


220


samples the analog signal to provide a sampled signal to the A/D converter


222


, and the A/D converter


222


converts the sampled signal into digital sampled data


212


that is stored in the RAM


210


.




In some embodiments of the invention, the microprocessor


200


executes the program


204


to perform a routine


240


to detect the pressure pulses


100


. In this manner, referring to

FIG. 6

, in the routine


240


, the microprocessor


200


reviews (block


250


) the latest sampled pressures (via the sampled data


212


) to detect some characteristic of a potential pressure pulse


100


, such as a falling, or trailing edge


107


(see

FIG. 4

) of a potential pressure pulse


100


. For example, for 35 p.s.i. pressure pressure pulses, the microprocessor


200


reviews the sampled data


212


to detect a 15 p.s.i. (for example) drop in the detected pressures, a drop that may indicate the trailing edge


107


. When the microprocessor


200


determines (diamond


252


) that a trailing edge


107


of a potential pressure pulse may have been detected, the microprocessor


200


proceeds to block


254


of FIG.


6


. Otherwise, the microprocessor


200


continues to review the latest sampled pressures.




When the microprocessor


200


detects a potential trailing edge


107


, the microprocessor


200


determines differences between the sampled pressures (as indicated by the sampled data


212


) and the ideal pressures that are indicated by the signature data


202


over a time interval called T


W


(see FIG.


4


). Based on these differences, the microprocessor


200


determines (block


256


) an amount of error, or an error fit, between the ideal and actual data based on these differences. Based on this error fit, the microprocessor


200


determines (diamond


258


) whether a pressure pulse


100


has been detected, and if so, sets (block


260


) a flag indicating the detection of a pressure pulse. Otherwise, it is deemed that a pressure pulse has not been detected, and the microprocessor


200


returns to block


250


.




As an example, the downhole pressure sensor


34


may detect the pulse


100


that rises upwardly at time T


2


and begins decreasing at time T


3


until the pressure P drops to the baseline pressure P


B


at time T


4


. Thus, based on the sampled data, the microprocessor


200


determines that at time T


4


, the pressure P has decreased by an amount that indicates a potential trailing edge


107


of a pressure pulse


100


. The microprocessor


200


then begins an error analysis beginning at a predetermined time interval T


W


after the time T


1


. The T


W


time interval represents the duration of an ideal pressure pulse


102


that is indicated by the signature data


202


. Thus, for this example, the error analysis begins at time T


1


, and the microprocessor


200


determines differences between the pulses


100


and


102


at different times from time T


1


to time T


3


. As an example, the microprocessor


200


may calculate an error fit by squaring each difference; adding the squared differences together to form a sum; and taking the square root of the sum. The microprocessor


200


then compares the calculated number to a threshold to determine whether a pressure pulse


100


has been detected. Of course, other techniques may be used to derive an error fit between the pulse that is indicated by the signature data


202


and the detected pulse.




Other embodiments are within the scope of the following claims. For example, in some embodiments of the invention, the microprocessor


200


may perform a technique


300


that is depicted in

FIG. 7

instead of performing the technique


240


that is depicted in FIG.


6


. The technique


300


is similar to the technique


240


except that the technique


300


replaces block


254


with block


302


. In this block


302


, the microprocessor


200


determines an exponential function to approximate the sampled pressures on the rising edge of the pulse


100


. In this manner, for the predetermined T


W


interval, the microprocessor


200


determines an exponential function that approximates the sampled pressures. The microprocessor


200


may perform this function by selecting the appropriate constants and time constants for the function to derive a “best fit,” assuming that the sampled pressures do indicate a pressure pulse. Thus, in this embodiment, the microprocessor


200


does not use stored signature data


206


. Instead, the microprocessor


200


determines an error fit (block


256


) by comparing values of the calculated exponential function to the, sampled pressure values at corresponding times.




In the context of this application, the phrase “exponential function” generally describes a function that has an exponential component and may include a function that is subtracted from, added to or multiplied by constants.




Other embodiments of the invention are possible in which a portion of the pulse


100


may resemble function other than an exponential function. For example, in some embodiments of the invention, the pulse


100


may include linear or parabolic portions. However, regardless of the signature of the pulse


100


, the detection techniques described here may be modified to detect a given pulse


100


.




As an example of other embodiments of the invention, the pressure pulse may be a pressure drop to form a negative pressure pulse relative to some baseline pressure level. For example, the central passageway of the string


20


may be filled with a large amount of gas, such as Nitrogen, for example, that may displace or compress liquid and/or gas that is already present in the central passageway. As examples, the Nitrogen gas may be supplied by a tanker or a truck. Once pressurized to the desired level, the pressure may be vented from the central passageway to create the negative pressure pulses.




As yet another example of another embodiment of the invention, the annulus, instead of the central passageway, may be used to propagate the pressure pulses using the techniques that are described here. Other arrangements are possible.




While the invention has been disclosed with respect to a limited number of embodiments, those skilled in the art, having the benefit of this disclosure, will appreciate numerous modifications and variations therefrom. It is intended that the appended claims cover all such modifications and variations as fall within the true spirit and scope of the invention.



Claims
  • 1. A system usable with a subterranean well, comprising:a downhole assembly adapted to respond to a command encoded in a stimulus communicated downhole, wherein the stimulus has a first pressure signature and the downhole assembly is adapted to compare the first pressure signature to a second pressure signature to determine an error between the first and second pressure signatures and determine whether the first signature indicates the command based on the error; and an apparatus to change a pressure of a gas in communication with the well to generate at least part of the stimulus.
  • 2. The system of claim 1, wherein the apparatus comprises:at least one container of gas; and a valve adapted to selectively introduce gas from said at least one container into the well to generate at least part of the stimulus.
  • 3. The system of claim 2, wherein said at least one container of gas comprises:multiple bottles of gas.
  • 4. The system of claim 2, wherein said at least one container of gas comprises multiple containers of gas, the system further comprising:a manifold connected to the multiple containers of gas to combine gas from the multiple containers of gas to generate the stimulus.
  • 5. The system of claim 4, wherein the manifold comprises at least one check valve to prevent flow of gas from the well into at least one of the containers.
  • 6. The system of claim 4, wherein the manifold comprises at least one flow restrictor to regulate a flow, of gas from at least one of the containers into the well.
  • 7. The system of claim 2, further comprising:another valve to selectively release pressure from the well to generate the stimulus.
  • 8. The system of claim 1, further comprising:a tubular string extending from the surface of the well to the downhole assembly, the tubular string containing a gas layer and a liquid layer and the stimulus propagating through the gas and liquid layers.
  • 9. The system of claim 1, further comprising:a tubular string extending from the surface of the well to the downhole assembly, the tubular string containing a gas layer and the stimulus propagating through the gas layer.
  • 10. The system of claim 1, wherein the stimulus comprises a predetermined pressure signature in at least one fluid layer of the well.
  • 11. The system of claim 1, wherein the downhole assembly is adapted to decode the command from the stimulus.
  • 12. The system of claim 1, wherein the downhole assembly performs an electrical function in response to the stimulus.
  • 13. The system of claim 12, wherein the downhole assembly comprises a firing head.
  • 14. The system of claim 1, wherein the downhole assembly performs a mechanical function in response to the stimulus.
  • 15. The system of claim 14, wherein the downhole assembly comprises a packer.
  • 16. The system of claim 14, wherein the downhole assembly comprises a valve.
  • 17. The system of claim 1, wherein the gas comprises an inert gas.
  • 18. The system of claim 1, wherein the gas comprises air.
  • 19. The system of claim 1, wherein the gas comprises nitrogen.
  • 20. The system of claim 1, further comprising:a tubular string extending from the surface of the well to the downhole assembly, the tubular string forming an annulus containing a gas layer and a liquid layer and the stimulus propagating through the gas and liquid layers.
  • 21. The system of claim 1; further comprising:a tubular string extending from the surface of the well to the downhole assembly, the tubular string forming an annulus containing a gas layer and the stimulus propagating through the gas layer.
  • 22. The system of claim 1, wherein an indication of the second pressure signature is stored in a memory of the downhole assembly.
  • 23. The system of claim 22, wherein the indication is stored in the memory before the downhole assembly is run downhole.
  • 24. The system of claim 22, wherein the indication is not stored in the memory in response to a downhole pressure measurement by the downhole assembly.
  • 25. A method usable with a subterranean well, comprising:establishing a gas layer above a downhole assembly located in the well; selectively changing a pressure of the gas layer to generate a stimulus to propagate through the gas layer to the downhole assembly, the stimulus having a first pressure signature; controlling the pressurizing of the gas layer to encode a command for the downhole assembly in the stimulus; comparing the first pressure signature to a second pressure signature to determine an error between the first pressure signature and the second pressure signature; and determining whether the first pressure signature indicates the command based on the error.
  • 26. The method of claim 25, further comprising:providing a liquid layer above the downhole assembly, wherein the stimulus propagates through the liquid layer.
  • 27. The method of claim 25, wherein the stimulus comprises a change in a pressure of the gas layer approximately less than or equal to 300 p.s.i.
  • 28. The method of claim 25, wherein the act of selectively changing the pressure comprises:selectively releasing gas from at least one gas container into the well.
  • 29. The method of claim 25, wherein the act of selectively changing the pressure comprises:selectively releasing gas from the well.
  • 30. The method of claim 25, further comprising:decoding the stimulus to extract the command; and performing an operation with the assembly in response to the decoding.
  • 31. The method of claim 25, further comprising:operating a mechanical apparatus in response to the stimulus.
  • 32. The method of claim 25, further comprising:operating an electrical apparatus in response to the stimulus.
  • 33. The method of claim 25, further comprising:firing a perforating gun in response to the stimulus.
  • 34. The method of claim 25, further comprising:setting a packer in response to the stimulus.
  • 35. The method of claim 25, further comprising:operating a valve in response to the stimulus.
  • 36. The method of claim 25, wherein the gas layer is present in a tubular string of the well.
  • 37. The method of claim 25, wherein the gas layer is present in an annulus of the well.
  • 38. The method of claim 25, wherein the gas layer is present in a hose that extends to the well.
  • 39. The method of claim 25, wherein the gas comprises an inert gas.
  • 40. The method of claim 25, wherein the gas comprises air.
  • 41. The method of claim 25, wherein the gas comprises nitrogen.
  • 42. The method of claim 25, wherein the gas comprises natural gas.
  • 43. The method of claim 25, further comprising:supplying the gas from a tanker.
  • 44. The method of claims 25, wherein an indication of the second pressure signature is stored in a memory of the downhole assembly.
  • 45. The method of claim 44, wherein the indication is stored in the memory before the downhole assembly is run downhole.
  • 46. The method of claim 44, wherein the indication is not stored in the memory in response to a downhole pressure measurement by the downhole assembly.
  • 47. A method usable with a subterranean well, comprising:receiving a stimulus downhole, the stimulus having a first pressure signature; comparing the first pressure signature to a second pressure signature to determine an error between the first and second pressure signatures; and determining whether the first signature indicates a command based on the error.
  • 48. The method of claim 47, further comprising:determining a mathematical function to approximate at least a portion of the first pressure signature; and using the mathematical function to form at least part of the second pressure signature.
  • 49. The method of claim 47, further comprising:storing data indicative of pressures to define at least a portion of the second pressure signature.
  • 50. The method of claims 47, further comprising:detecting a characteristic of the first pressure signature; and performing the comparison of the first and second pressure signatures in response to the detection.
  • 51. The method of claim 50, wherein the characteristic comprises a falling pressure level of the stimulus.
  • 52. The method of claims 47, wherein the act of comparing comprises:over a prior predetermined interval of time, determining differences between values associated with the first pressure signature and values associated with the second pressure signature; and determining the error based on the differences.
  • 53. The method of claim 52, wherein the values associated with the first pressure signature comprise detected pressures.
  • 54. The method of claim 52, further comprising:storing indications of the values associated with the first pressure signature in a memory.
  • 55. A downhole assembly usable with a subterranean well, comprising:a sensor to receive a stimulus communicated downhole, the stimulus having a first pressure signature; and a controller coupled to the sensor and adapted to: compare the first pressure signature to a second pressure signature to determine an error between the first pressure signature and the second pressure signature, and determine whether the first pressure signature indicates a command based on the error.
  • 56. The downhole assembly of 55, wherein the controller is further adapted to:determine a mathematical function to approximate at least a portion of the first pressure signature; and use the mathematical function to form at least part of the second pressure signature.
  • 57. The downhole assembly of claim 55, wherein the controller is further adapted to:detect a characteristic of the first pressure signature; and perform the comparison of the first pressure signature to the second pressure signature after the detection.
  • 58. The downhole assembly of claim 57, wherein the characteristic comprises a falling pressure level of the stimulus.
  • 59. The downhole assembly of claim 55, wherein the controller is adapted to compare by over a prior predetermined interval of time, determining differences between values associated with the first pressure signature and values associated with the second pressure signature; and determining the error based on the differences.
  • 60. The downhole assembly of claim 59, wherein the values associated with the first pressure signature comprise detected pressures.
  • 61. The downhole assembly of claim 59, further comprising:a memory coupled to the controller to store indications of the values associated with the first pressure signature in a memory.
  • 62. The downhole assembly of claim 59, further comprising:a memory coupled to the controller to store indications of the values associated with the second pressure signature in a memory.
  • 63. The downhole assembly of claim 59, wherein the controller is further adapted to:operate a downhole tool in response to the determination of whether the first signature indicates a command.
  • 64. The downhole assembly of claim 63, wherein the downhole tool comprises a packer.
  • 65. The downhole assembly of claim 63, wherein the downhole tool comprises a firing head.
  • 66. The downhole assembly of claim 63, wherein the downhole tool comprises a, valve.
  • 67. The downhole assembly of claim 55, further comprising:a memory storing an indication of the second pressure signature.
  • 68. The downhole assembly of claim 67, wherein the indication is stored in the memory before the downhole assembly is run downhole.
  • 69. The downhole assembly of claim 67, wherein the indication is not stored in the memory in response to a downhole pressure measurement by the downhole assembly.
US Referenced Citations (22)
Number Name Date Kind
3254531 Briggs, Jr. Jun 1966 A
3665955 Conner, Sr. May 1972 A
3971317 Gemmell et al. Jul 1976 A
4078620 Westlake et al. Mar 1978 A
4489786 Beck Dec 1984 A
4553589 Jennings et al. Nov 1985 A
4632034 Colle, Jr. Dec 1986 A
4635717 Jageler Jan 1987 A
4712613 Nieuwstad Dec 1987 A
4856595 Upchurch Aug 1989 A
4896722 Upchurch Jan 1990 A
4915168 Upchurch Apr 1990 A
4953618 Hamid et al. Sep 1990 A
4971160 Upchurch Nov 1990 A
5056600 Surjaatmadja et al. Oct 1991 A
5515336 Chin et al. May 1996 A
5691712 Meek et al. Nov 1997 A
5963138 Gruenhagen Oct 1999 A
5965031 Kitz et al. Oct 1999 A
6173772 Vaynshteyn Jan 2001 B1
6182764 Vaynshteyn Feb 2001 B1
6384738 Carstensen et al. May 2002 B1
Foreign Referenced Citations (3)
Number Date Country
0 344 060 Nov 1989 EP
0 456 415 Nov 1991 EP
0 604 134 Jun 1994 EP