The present invention relates generally to communications connectors and, more particularly, to methods and apparatus for reducing crosstalk in communications connectors.
In an electrical communication system, it is sometimes advantageous to transmit information signals (e.g., video, audio, data) over a pair of wires (hereinafter “wire-pair” or “differential pair”) rather than a single wire using balanced transmission techniques. In such systems, the transmitted information signal comprises the voltage difference between the wires without regard to the absolute voltages present. Each wire in a wire-pair is susceptible to picking up electrical noise from sources such as lightning, automobile spark plugs and radio stations to name but a few. Because this type of noise is common to both wires within a pair, the differential information signal is typically not disturbed.
Of greater concern, however, is the electrical noise that is picked up from nearby wires or pairs of wires that may extend in the same general direction for some distance. This noise is referred to as crosstalk. In a communication system involving networked computers, channels are formed by cascading connectors and cable segments. In such channels, the close channels are formed by cascading connectors and cable segments. In such channels, the close proximities and routings of the electrical wires (conductors) and the contacting structures within the connectors can produce capacitive as well as inductive couplings that generate near-end crosstalk (NEXT) (i.e., the crosstalk measured at an input location corresponding to a source at the same location) as well as far-end crosstalk (FEXT) (i.e., the crosstalk measured at the output location corresponding to a source at the input location). The crosstalk induced from the wire(s) of a first differential pair on a second closely spaced differential pair generally comprises an undesired signal that can interfere with the information signal carried by the second differential pair. As long as the same noise signal is added to each wire in the wire-pair, the voltage difference between the wires will remain about the same and differential crosstalk is not induced, while at the same time the average voltage on the two wires with respect to ground reference is elevated and common mode crosstalk is induced. On the other hand, when equal but opposite noise signals are added to each wire in the wire pair, the voltage difference between the wires will be elevated and differential crosstalk is induced, while the average voltage on the two wires with respect to ground reference is not elevated and common mode crosstalk is not induced. The term “differential to differential crosstalk” refers to a differential source signal on one pair inducing a differential noise signal on a nearby pair. The term “differential to common mode crosstalk” refers to a differential source signal on one pair inducing a common mode noise signal on a nearby pair. Uncompensated differential to differential and/or differential to common mode crosstalk can reduce the performance of communications connectors and the communications systems in which such connectors are used.
Pursuant to certain embodiments of the present invention, wire connection systems are provided that include a mounting substrate, first and second pairs of wire connection terminals that are mounted in the mounting substrate, and a parasitic conductive loop mounted adjacent a first wire connection terminal of the first pair of wire connection terminals. The wire connection system may, for example, be a 110-style wire connection block.
In these wire connection systems, a first portion of the parasitic conductive loop may be positioned to receive an induced signal from at least the first wire connection terminal of the first pair of wire connection terminals. A second portion of the parasitic conductive loop may be positioned so that the received induced signal generates a magnetic field adjacent at least one of the wire connection terminals of the second pair of wire connection terminals. This magnetic field may at least partially cancel a second magnetic field generated by a second wire connection terminal of the first pair of wire connection terminals. The parasitic conductive loop may, in certain embodiments, be mounted between the first pair and the second pair of wire connection terminals. The wire connection terminals may, for example, be insulation displacement contacts (IDCs). In embodiments that include IDCS, each of the IDCs may include slots for receiving conductors at opposite upper and lower ends thereof, and the slots of each IDC may be generally parallel and non-collinear.
In certain embodiments, the parasitic conductive loop may be configured to receive a first induced signal from the first wire connection terminal of the first pair of wire connection terminals that travels around the loop in a first direction, and to receive a second induced signal from a second wire connection terminal of the first pair of wire connection terminals that travels around the loop in the first direction. The first pair of wire connection terminals comprises a first IDC and a second IDC, and the second pair of wire connection terminals comprises a third IDC and a fourth IDC. In these embodiments, the first and third IDCs may be part of a first row of IDCs and the second and fourth IDCs may be part of a second row of IDCs, and the parasitic conductive loop may be configured to couple energy from a signal carried on the first IDC to the fourth IDC. In such embodiments the parasitic conductive loop may further be configured to couple energy from a signal carried on the second IDC to the third IDC.
In certain embodiments, a first portion of the parasitic conductive loop may be sized, shaped and positioned with respect to the first wire connection terminal of the first pair of wire connection terminals in order to induce a first crosstalk signal on the parasitic conductive loop from a signal carried by the first wire connection terminal. In these embodiments, a second portion of the parasitic conductive loop may be sized, shaped and positioned with respect to one of the wire connection terminals of the second pair of wire connection terminals in order to induce a second crosstalk signal onto the one of the wire connection terminals of the second pair of wire connection terminals from the first crosstalk signal.
In some embodiments, the first pair of wire connection terminals may be part of a first connecting block, and the second pair of wire connection terminals are part of a second wire connection block. In other embodiments, the first and second pairs of wire connection terminals may be adjacent pairs of wire connection terminals in the same connecting block.
Pursuant to further embodiments of the present invention, crosstalk reduction circuits are provided for communications connectors that include a first conductor that carries a first signal and a second conductor that carries a second signal. In these connectors the crosstalk reduction circuit comprises a parasitic conductive loop that is configured to receive a current induced from a first magnetic field generated by the first signal, where the current induced on the parasitic conductive loop generates a third magnetic field that at least partially cancels out a second magnetic field that is generated by the second signal. The third magnetic field may at least partially cancel the second magnetic field in the vicinity of a third conductor of the communications connector.
In certain embodiments, the first and second signals may be equal but opposite signals. The first and second conductors may, for example, be insulation displacement contacts (IDC). In IDC embodiments, the first IDC may have first and second conductor receiving slots that are in the same plane, but non-collinear.
In specific embodiments, a first portion of the parasitic conductive loop is adjacent the first conductor and a second portion of the parasitic conductive loop is adjacent the second conductor. In these embodiments, a portion of a third magnetic field adjacent the first portion of the parasitic conductive loop has a first direction and a portion of the third magnetic field adjacent the second portion of the parasitic conductive loop has a second direction that is substantially opposite the first direction.
In specific embodiments, the first conductor may be a first conductor of a pair of conductors of a modular plug, and the second conductor may be the second conductor of the pair of conductors. In these embodiments, the first and second signals may be equal magnitude but opposite polarity signals.
Pursuant to still additional embodiments of the present invention, communications connectors are provided that include a parasitic coupling element, a first conductor adjacent a first portion of the parasitic coupling element and a second conductor adjacent a second portion of the parasitic coupling element. In these connectors, the parasitic coupling element is configured to couple a compensating crosstalk signal that is induced from the first conductor to the second conductor, where the coupled compensating crosstalk signal is induced on the second conductor in a direction opposite the direction of a signal from which the crosstalk signal was generated. The parasitic coupling element may comprise a loop, and the first portion of the parasitic coupling element may be on a first part of the loop and the second portion of the parasitic coupling element may be on a second portion of the loop that is generally opposite the first part of the loop.
Pursuant to still further embodiments of the present invention, communications connectors are provided that include a first contact and a second contact that are configured to receive a first differential signal, a third contact and a fourth contact that are configured to receive a second differential signal, and a parasitic coupling element positioned between the first and second contacts and the third and fourth contacts, where the parasitic coupling element is configured to receive a first induced signal from the first contact that has a first polarity and to receive a second induced signal from the second contact that has the first polarity.
Pursuant to yet additional embodiments of the present invention, methods for reducing a differential crosstalk signal induced from a first pair of conductors that comprises a first conductor and a second conductor onto a third conductor of a communications connector are provided. Pursuant to these methods, a crosstalk signal is induced from a signal flowing through the first conductor onto a first portion of a parasitic conductive loop so as to generate a first magnetic field around a second portion of the parasitic conductive loop that at least partially cancels a second magnetic field generated by a signal flowing through the second conductor. The first and second magnetic fields may at least partially cancel each other adjacent the third conductor.
Pursuant to still further embodiments of the present invention, wire connection blocks are provided that include first and second wire connection terminals that define a first row of wire connection terminals and third and fourth wire connection terminals that define a second row of wire connection terminals that is generally parallel to the first row of wire connection terminals. The wire connection blocks further include an inductive coupling element that is positioned to inductively couple energy from a signal transmitted on the first wire connection terminal to the fourth wire connection terminal. In some embodiments, the inductive coupling element may be a parasitic conductive loop. In other embodiments, the inductive coupling element may be a signal carrying protrusion on the first wire connection terminal.
The present invention will be described more particularly hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings. The invention is not intended to be limited to the illustrated embodiments; rather, these embodiments are intended to fully and completely disclose the invention to those skilled in this art. In the drawings, like numbers refer to like elements throughout. Thicknesses and dimensions of some components may be exaggerated for clarity.
Spatially relative terms, such as “under”, “below”, “lower”, “over”, “upper”, “left”, “right” and the like, may be used herein for ease of description to describe one element or feature's relationship to another element(s) or feature(s) as illustrated in the figures. It will be understood that the spatially relative terms are intended to encompass different orientations of the device in use or operation in addition to the orientation depicted in the figures. For example, if the device in the figures is turned over, elements described as “under” or “beneath” other elements or features would then be oriented “over” the other elements or features. Thus, the exemplary term “under” can encompass both an orientation of over and under. The device may be otherwise oriented (rotated 90 degrees or at other orientations) and the spatially relative descriptors used herein interpreted accordingly.
Well-known functions or constructions may not be described in detail for brevity and/or clarity.
As used herein the expression “and/or” includes any and all combinations of one or more of the associated listed items.
The terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of the invention. As used herein, the singular forms “a”, “an” and “the” are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. It will be further understood that the terms “comprises”, “comprising”, “includes” and/or “including,” when used in this specification, specify the presence of stated features, operations, elements, and/or components, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, operations, elements, components, and/or groups thereof.
Unless otherwise defined, all terms (including technical and scientific terms) used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs. It will be further understood that terms, such as those defined in commonly used dictionaries, should be interpreted as having a meaning that is consistent with their meaning in the context of the relevant art and will not be interpreted in an idealized or overly formal sense unless expressly so defined herein.
Where used, the terms “attached”, “connected”, “interconnected”, “contacting”, “mounted” and the like can mean either direct or indirect attachment or contact between elements, unless stated otherwise.
Pursuant to embodiments of the present invention, communications connectors are provided which include one or more “parasitic conductive loops” that are used to alter the inductive and/or capacitive coupling between targeted conductors within the communications connector. The communications connectors according to embodiments of the present invention may exhibit reduced levels of differential to differential and/or differential to common mode crosstalk between conductors thereof.
As used herein, the term “conductive loop” refers to a conductive element that forms a closed or endless path through which current can flow. As the conductive loop is a closed path, an electrical signal that is introduced onto a portion of the conductive loop can travel around the loop to return to the location where it was introduced onto the loop. The term “loop” refers to the fact that the loop defines a closed path, and does not limit the invention to loops having any particular 2-dimensional or 3-dimensional shapes. For example, the conductive loops according to embodiments of the present invention can be circular, oval, rectangular, parallelogramatic, rhomboid, etc. or combinations of such shapes. The conductive loops may also be three-dimensional in nature, and/or may include more than one closed path. By way of example, a conductive loop could be implemented on a printed circuit board to have a rectangular shape when viewed from above by providing (1) a first L-shaped trace implemented on a first layer of the printed circuit board, (2) a second L-shaped trace implemented on a second layer of the printed circuit board, and (3) a pair of metal plated holes that connect the two traces.
As used herein, a “parasitic” element (also referred to as a “parasitic coupling element”) refers to an element that is not directly electrically connected to one or more second elements, but which is positioned so as to receive a crosstalk signal from the one or more second elements via capacitive and/or inductive coupling. Thus, a “parasitic conductive loop” refers to a closed-loop conductive path that is positioned near, but not in physical contact with, one or more second elements, such that a crosstalk signal is inductively and/or capacitively coupled from the one or more second elements onto the closed-loop conductive path.
As shown in
As the parasitic conductive loop 4 is a closed path, the current 6 that is induced on the loop 4 will tend to flow around the loop 4. As the direction of the loop 4 changes at various points, the magnetic field 6′ that is generated by the current 6 also changes directions. Thus, for example, as shown in
As shown in
Communications connectors according to further embodiments of the present invention will now be described with respect to
As shown in
As shown in
Referring now to
As is illustrated in
As can be seen in
As is also shown in
As also shown in
The parasitic conductive loop 60a of
In the embodiment of
The operation of the parasitic conductive loop 60a will now be described with respect to
As also shown in
As is further shown in
Similar to IDC 24e, IDC 24a also induces a current onto the parasitic conductive loop 60a. In particular, due to the proximity between the lower end of IDC 24a and the lower end of the right loop portion 61a, the signal 71a that is traveling down the IDC 24a induces a signal 72a on the lower end of the right loop portion 61a. The induced signal 72a travels in a direction opposite the direction of travel of signal 71a; hence the arrow designating signal 72a points up the right loop portion 61a towards the top loop portion 62a. Thus, after being induced onto the lower end of the right loop portion 61a, the signal 72a travels through the upper end of the right loop portion 61a where the signal 72a travels in close proximity to the upper end 32 of IDC 24b. Due to this close proximity, the signal 72a induces a signal 73a on the upper end 32 of IDC 24b. The induced signal 73a travels in a direction opposite the direction of travel of signal 72a; hence the arrow designating signal 73a points down the IDC 24b.
As is further shown in
If the parasitic loop 60a was not provided, the crosstalk that would be present on, for example, IDC 24f would include the sum of the crosstalk (both inductive and capacitive) induced from IDC 24e and IDC 24a onto IDC 24f. If the spacings and/or orientations of the IDCs result in IDC 24a and IDC 24e inducing different amounts of crosstalk onto IDC 24f, then there will not be full cancellation, and the remaining uncancelled crosstalk will appear as interference (noise) to the information signal present on IDC 24f. The crosstalk induced from IDCs 24a and 24e onto IDC 24f may comprise both NEXT and FEXT. As is known to persons of skill in the art, NEXT is equal to the sum of the differential capacitive and inductive coupling between IDCs 24a and 24e onto IDC 24f, while FEXT is equal to the difference of the differential capacitive and inductive coupling between IDCs 24a and 24e onto IDC 24f.
The inductive loop 60a changes this equation in two ways. First, the presence of the loop 60a may reduce the amount of crosstalk that flows directly from IDCs 24a and 24e onto IDC 24f. Second, as discussed above, the signals 72e, 72a that are induced onto the parasitic conductive loop 60a induce currents 73e and 74a on IDC 24f. In order to reduce and/or minimize the total uncancelled crosstalk induced on IDC 24f from IDCs 24a, 24e, the dimensions of the components (e.g., the IDCs, the parasitic conductive loop and the wires in the slots) and their physical arrangement with respect to each other may be designed so that the sum of the crosstalk signals induced on IDC 24f is small. The amount of inductive versus capacitive crosstalk may also be adjusted using the parasitic conductive loop to optimize both the NEXT and FEXT equations. The connecting block may similarly be designed to reduce and/or minimize the crosstalk induced on IDC 24b from IDCs 24a, 24e, as well as the crosstalk from IDCs 24b and 24f onto each of IDCs 24a and 24e.
The manner in which the parasitic inductive loop 60a may facilitate canceling crosstalk can also be understood by examining the electromagnetic fields that are generated both in the IDCs 24e, 24a and in the parasitic loop 60a. In particular,
Focusing now on the magnetic fields 80e and 82 in
While the above example illustrates a connecting block 22 that incorporates IDCs 24a-24h that include jogs, it will be appreciated that the parasitic conductive loops of the present invention may also be used with conventional straight double-slotted IDCs. In such embodiments, planar parasitic conductive loops similar to the loop 60a discussed above may be used or, alternatively, three-dimensional parasitic conductive loops could be used such as, for example, parasitic conductive loops that include a jog. It will further be appreciated that the parasitic conductive loop need not be positioned between the IDCs, but instead may be positioned in other adjacent locations where the loop is capable of receiving an induced current from one or more disturbing conductors and can then use that induced current to generate a magnetic field in a second location that may facilitate reducing crosstalk within the connector.
Likewise, in certain embodiments of the present invention, parasitic rings 60a-60d need not be provided between each IDC pair. For example, it has been found that significant improvement in performance may be obtained by simply providing a parasitic ring 60 between each adjacent connecting block 22 (but otherwise not providing a parasitic ring between the four IDC pairs within each connecting block 22). Such a parasitic ring 60 could be mounted at one end of each connecting block 22, or could alternatively comprise a separate component that is mounted between adjacent connecting blocks 22.
It will also be appreciated that the concepts discussed above are equally applicable to other types of communications connectors. For example, a number of cross-connect systems are known in the art that are not compatible with 110-style cross-connect wiring systems. The parasitic conductive loops according to embodiments of the present invention can likewise be applied in these systems.
It will also be appreciated that both IDCs of an IDC pair need not induce significant amounts of current on the parasitic conductive loop. By way of example, in the embodiment discussed with respect to
It will also be appreciated that, as with any crosstalk reduction systems, the size, shape, orientation, positioning, etc. of the conductive elements that are part of, or react with, the crosstalk reduction system must be selected to provide an appropriate level of crosstalk cancellation. Here, such parameters include at least the shape of the parasitic conductive loop(s) and all size parameters associated with such loops (e.g., thickness, dimensions, etc.), the shape sizes of the conductive elements (e.g., contacts, wires, etc.) that receive energy from and/or induce energy onto the parasitic conductive loop, the distances between conductive elements, and the orientation of the parasitic loop and each such conductive element with respect to each other. Additionally, capacitive coupling may occur between the wires that are inserted into the slots 31, 33 of each IDC 24a-24h and an adjacent parasitic conductive loop and/or the IDCs of an adjacent pair. Accordingly, the length of these wires and the relative position of the wires with respect to the parasitic conductive loop(s) and/or adjacent IDCs may be taken into account when tuning the design. Furthermore, while the description above has focused on the inductive coupling effects between the IDCs 24a-24h and the parasitic conductive loops 60a-60d, it will be appreciated that capacitive coupling also will occur between the IDCs and the parasitic conductive loops. This capacitive coupling may also need to be taken into account in the design to achieve a desired level of crosstalk reduction. In the embodiment of
It will also be appreciated that a parasitic conductive loop may be created that is not a closed path. In particular, a loop may be created that included one or more very short breaks in the loop, with large capacitors provided that effectively allow current to span these gaps.
Pursuant to further embodiments of the present invention, modular plugs are provided that include parasitic conductive loops.
Certain industry standards (e.g., the TIA/EIA-568-B.2-1 standard approved Jun. 20, 2002 by the Telecommunications Industry Association) specify that modular plugs include a total of eight wires that are configured to transmit four differential signals (i.e., four differential pairs). Pursuant to these standards, at the mating point between the modular plug and a modular jack, the wires of the first differential pair are placed in the two middle slots 120 (slots 4 and 5), the wires of the second differential pair are placed in the two leftmost slots 120 (slots 1 and 2), the wires of the fourth differential pair are placed in the two rightmost slots 120 (slots 7 and 8), and the wires of the third differential pair are placed in the remaining two slots 120 (slots 3 and 6). Thus, in at least the connection region where the contacts 121 of the modular plug 111 mate with the contacts of a corresponding modular jack (not shown in
In order to reduce such differential to common mode crosstalk, a printed circuit board 130 may be mounted in sled 113. As shown in
Pursuant to further embodiments of the present invention, parasitic conductive loops may also be implemented in modular jacks. By way of example, a printed circuit board containing a parasitic conductive loop could be positioned adjacent the lead frame of a modular jack similar to how the parasitic ring 132 is positioned adjacent the contacts of the modular plug 111 in
Pursuant to specific embodiments of the present invention, wire connection systems are provided that include a mounting substrate, first and second pairs of wire connection terminals that are mounted in the mounting substrate, and a parasitic conductive loop mounted adjacent a first wire connection terminal of the first pair of wire connection terminals. Such wire connection systems include, for example, a wire connection block that has first and second pairs of IDCs mounted in the wire connection housing.
Pursuant to further embodiments of the present invention, crosstalk reduction circuits are provided for communications connectors. The crosstalk reduction circuit may be implemented as a parasitic conductive loop that is configured to receive a current induced from a first magnetic field that is generated by a first signal that is transmitted on a first conductor of the connector. The current so induced on the parasitic conductive loop generates a third magnetic field that at least partially cancels out a second magnetic field that is generated by a second signal that is transmitted on a second conductor of the connector.
Pursuant to additional embodiments of the present invention, communications connectors are provided that include a parasitic coupling element, a first conductor adjacent a first portion of the parasitic coupling element and a second conductor adjacent a second portion of the parasitic coupling element. In these connectors, the parasitic coupling element is configured to couple a compensating crosstalk signal that contains energy from a signal transmitted on the first conductor to the second conductor. The coupled compensating crosstalk signal is induced on the second conductor in a direction opposite the direction of the signal from which the crosstalk signal was generated.
Pursuant to yet further embodiments of the present invention, communications connectors are provided that include a first pair of contacts that are configured to receive a first differential signal, a second pair of contacts that are configured to receive a second differential signal, and a parasitic coupling element positioned between the first and second pairs of contacts. The parasitic coupling element receives first and second induced signals that have the same polarity from the respective contacts of the first pair of contacts.
Pursuant to yet additional embodiments of the present invention, methods for reducing a differential crosstalk signal induced from a first pair of conductors onto a third conductor of a communications connector are provided. Pursuant to these methods, a crosstalk signal is induced from a signal flowing through one of the conductors of the first pair of conductors onto a first portion of a parasitic conductive loop so as to generate a first magnetic field around a second portion of the parasitic conductive loop that at least partially cancels a second magnetic field generated by a signal flowing through the other conductor of the fist pair of conductors.
Pursuant to still further embodiments of the present invention, wire connection blocks are provided that include first and second wire connection terminals that define a first row of wire connection terminals and third and fourth wire connection terminals that define a second row of wire connection terminals that is generally parallel to the first row of wire connection terminals. The wire connection blocks further include an inductive coupling element that is positioned to inductively couple energy from a signal transmitted on the first wire connection terminal to the fourth wire connection terminal.
The foregoing is illustrative of the present invention and is not to be construed as limiting thereof. Although exemplary embodiments of this invention have been described, those skilled in the art will readily appreciate that many modifications are possible in the exemplary embodiments without materially departing from the novel teachings and advantages of this invention. Accordingly, all such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of this invention as defined in the claims. The invention is defined by the following claims, with equivalents of the claims to be included therein.
This application claims priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/761,088, filed Jan. 23, 2006, entitled COMMUNICATIONS CONNECTORS WITH PARASITIC COUPLING ELEMENTS FOR REDUCING CROSSTALK AND RELATED METHODS, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4825162 | Roemer et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
5186647 | Denkmann et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5326284 | Bohbot et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5459643 | Siemon et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5460545 | Siemon et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5547405 | Pinney et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5634817 | Siemon et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5708361 | Wang et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5733140 | Baker, III et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5864039 | Kawakita et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
6290524 | Simmel | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6413121 | Hyland | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6520808 | Forbes et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6716054 | Denovich et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6729899 | Aekins et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
20040002261 | Pepe et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040124840 | Reykowski | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20060121788 | Pharney | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060183359 | Gerber et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070184725 | Hashim | Aug 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 844 697 | May 1998 | EP |
1 693 933 | Aug 2006 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070173103 A1 | Jul 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60761088 | Jan 2006 | US |