Communications device with concurrent operation in 5GHZ and 6GHZ U-NII frequency ranges

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 12225387
  • Patent Number
    12,225,387
  • Date Filed
    Monday, December 13, 2021
    3 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, February 11, 2025
    8 months ago
Abstract
Communications devices are disclosed. A communications device includes an unlicensed national information infrastructure frequency range 1 (U-NII-1) to U-NII-2A transceiver coupled to a first antenna though a U-NII-1 to U-NII-2A coexistence filter, and a U-NII-2C to U-NII-8 transceiver coupled to a second antenna though a U-NII-2C to U-NII-8 coexistence filter.
Description
NOTICE OF COPYRIGHTS AND TRADE DRESS

A portion of the disclosure of this patent document contains material which is subject to copyright protection. This patent document may show and/or describe matter which is or may become trade dress of the owner. The copyright and trade dress owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent disclosure as it appears in the Patent and Trademark Office patent files or records, but otherwise reserves all copyright and trade dress rights whatsoever.


BACKGROUND
Field

This disclosure relates to radio frequency filters using acoustic wave resonators, and specifically to filters for use in communications equipment.


Description of the Related Art

A radio frequency (RF) filter is a two-port device configured to pass some frequencies and to stop other frequencies, where “pass” means transmit with relatively low signal loss and “stop” means block or substantially attenuate. The range of frequencies passed by a filter is referred to as the “pass-band” of the filter. The range of frequencies stopped by such a filter is referred to as the “stop-band” of the filter. A typical RF filter has at least one pass-band and at least one stop-band. Specific requirements on a passband or stop-band depend on the specific application. For example, a “pass-band” may be defined as a frequency range where the insertion loss of a filter is better than a defined value such as 1 dB, 2 dB, or 3 dB. A “stop-band” may be defined as a frequency range where the rejection of a filter is greater than a defined value such as 20 dB, 30 dB, 40 dB, or greater depending on application.


RF filters are used in communications systems where information is transmitted over wireless links. For example, RF filters may be found in the RF front-ends of cellular base stations, mobile telephone and computing devices, satellite transceivers and ground stations, IoT (Internet of Things) devices, laptop computers and tablets, fixed point radio links, and other communications systems. RF filters are also used in radar and electronic and information warfare systems.


RF filters typically require many design trade-offs to achieve, for each specific application, the best compromise between performance parameters such as insertion loss, rejection, isolation, power handling, linearity, size and cost. Specific design and manufacturing methods and enhancements can benefit simultaneously one or several of these requirements.


Performance enhancements to the RF filters in a wireless system can have broad impact to system performance. Improvements in RF filters can be leveraged to provide system performance improvements such as larger cell size, longer battery life, higher data rates, greater network capacity, lower cost, enhanced security, higher reliability, etc. These improvements can be realized at many levels of the wireless system both separately and in combination, for example at the RF module, RF transceiver, mobile or fixed sub-system, or network levels.


High performance RF filters for present communication systems commonly incorporate acoustic wave resonators including surface acoustic wave (SAW) resonators, bulk acoustic wave (BAW) resonators, film bulk acoustic wave resonators (FBAR), and other types of acoustic resonators. However, these existing technologies are not well-suited for use at the higher frequencies and bandwidths proposed for future communications networks.


The desire for wider communication channel bandwidths will inevitably lead to the use of higher frequency communications bands. Radio access technology for mobile telephone networks has been standardized by the 3GPP (3rd Generation Partnership Project). Radio access technology for 5th generation mobile networks is defined in the 5G NR (new radio) standard. The 5G NR standard defines several new communications bands. Two of these new communications bands are n77, which uses the frequency range from 3300 MHz to 4200 MHz, and n79, which uses the frequency range from 4400 MHz to 5000 MHz. Both band n77 and band n79 use time-division duplexing (TDD), such that a communications device operating in band n77 and/or band n79 use the same frequencies for both uplink and downlink transmissions. Bandpass filters for bands n77 and n79 must be capable of handling the transmit power of the communications device.


The Unlicensed National Information Infrastructure (U-NII) band, as defined by the United States Federal Communications Commission, is the portion of the radio frequency spectrum from 5.15 GHz to 7.125 GHz. The U-NII band is used by wireless local area networks (WLANs) and by many wireless Internet service providers. U-NII consists of eight ranges. Portions of U-NII-1 through U-NII-4 are used for 5 GHz WLANs based on the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE) Standard 802.11a and newer standards (commonly referred to as 5 GHz Wi-Fi®). U-NII-5 though U-NII-8 are allocated for 6 GHz WLANs based on the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE) Standard 802.11ax (commonly referred to a 6 GHz Wi-Fi). The U-NII frequency ranges also require high frequency and wide bandwidth bandpass filters.


The Transversely-Excited Film Bulk Acoustic Resonator (XBAR) is an acoustic resonator structure for use in microwave filters. The XBAR is described in U.S. Pat. No. 10,491,291, titled TRANSVERSELY EXCITED FILM BULK ACOUSTIC RESONATOR. An XBAR resonator comprises an interdigital transducer (IDT) formed on a thin floating layer, or diaphragm, of a single-crystal piezoelectric material. The IDT includes a first set of parallel fingers, extending from a first busbar and a second set of parallel fingers extending from a second busbar. The first and second sets of parallel fingers are interleaved. A microwave signal applied to the IDT excites a shear primary acoustic wave in the piezoelectric diaphragm. XBAR resonators provide very high electromechanical coupling and high frequency capability. XBAR resonators may be used in a variety of RF filters including band-reject filters, band-pass filters, duplexers, and multiplexers. XBARs are well suited for use in filters for communications bands with frequencies above 3 GHz.





DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a diagram showing the defined U-NII frequency ranges.



FIG. 2 is a block diagram of portions of a communication device with concurrent operation in 5 GHz and 6 GHz U-NII frequency ranges.



FIG. 3 is a graph of the input-output transfer function S2,1 of exemplary coexistence bandpass filters for the radio of FIG. 2.



FIG. 4 is a block diagram of another communications device with concurrent operation in 5 GHz and 6 GHz U-NII frequency ranges.





Throughout this description, elements appearing in figures are assigned three-digit or four-digit reference designators, where the two least significant digits are specific to the element and the one or two most significant digit is the figure number where the element is first introduced. An element that is not described in conjunction with a figure may be presumed to have the same characteristics and function as a previously-described element having the same reference designator.


DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Description of Apparatus



FIG. 1 is a chart depicting the U-NII frequency spectrum, which is divided into 8 frequency ranges designated U-NII-1 through U-NII-8. U-NII-2 is divided into three portions, or sub-ranges, designated U-NII-2A, U-NII-2B, and U-NII-2C. Almost all of the U-NII frequency spectrum is allocated for WLANs (and other applications) with the exception of U-NII-2B and a small frequency band around 5.925 GHz (the upper edge of U-NII-4 and the lower edge of U-NII-5). The unallocated portions of the U-NII spectrum are cross-hatched in FIG. 1.


It is desirable for a communications device to be able to concurrently use more than one portion of the U-NII spectrum. However, concurrent use, or coexistence of two or more portions of the spectrum requires a corresponding number of filters to distinguish between the portions. Each filter would be required to pass a respective portion of the spectrum while blocking the other portions. Such filters are called “coexistence filters” in this patent.


Realizable RF filters transition between pass-bands and stop-bands over a finite frequency range. The unallocated frequency range between U-NII-4 and U-NII-5 is, at most, 50 MHz, which is much smaller than the transition frequency range for coexistence filters having an acceptable size and cost for a portable communications device. Unallocated frequency range U-NII-2B covers 120 MHz. Additionally, the upper 10 MHz of range U-NII-2A and the lowest 10 MHz of U-NII-2C are not used by WLAN channels defined by IEEE Standard 802.11. The total un-used spectrum of 140 MHz is sufficient for coexistence filters to allow concurrent operation of WLANs in the U-NII-1/U-NII-2A spectrum and WLANs in the U-NII-2C to U-NII-8 spectrum.



FIG. 2 is a block diagram of portions of a communications device 200 capable of concurrent communications in two portions of the U-NII spectrum. Specifically, the communications device 200 can communicate in the U-NII-1 to U-NII-2A spectrum and concurrently communicate in the U-NII-2C to U-NII-8 spectrum.


The communications device 200 includes a U-NII-1 to U-NII-2A transceiver (transmitter/receiver) 210 coupled to an antenna 225 via a U-NII-1 to U-NII-2A coexistence filter 220. The U-NII-1 to U-NII-2A transceiver 210 includes a transmitter, a receiver, and a transmit/receive switch to select which of the transmitter and receiver is connected to the coexistence filter 220 at any given time. The U-NII-1 to U-NII-2A transceiver 210 typically also includes one or more digital processors performing processing functions such as digital signal processing and media access control functions. The U-NII-1 to U-NII-2A coexistence filter 220 is configured to pass (i.e. transmit with acceptably low loss) the U-NII-1 to U-NII-2A frequency spectrum and stop (i.e., adequately attenuate) the U-NII-2C to U-NII-8 frequency spectrum.


The communications device 200 also includes a U-NII-2C to U-NII-8 transceiver (transmitter/receiver) 230 coupled to an antenna 245 via a U-NII-2C to U-NII-8 coexistence filter 240. The U-NII-2C to U-NII-8 transceiver 230 includes a transmitter, a receiver, and a transmit/receive switch to select which of the transmitter and receiver is connected to the coexistence filter 240 at any given time. The U-NII-2C to U-NII-8 transceiver 230 typically also includes one or more digital processors performing processing functions such as digital signal processing and media access control functions. The U-NII-2C to U-NII-8 coexistence filter 240 is configured to pass (i.e. transmit with acceptably low loss) the U-NII-2C to U-NII-8 frequency spectrum and stop (i.e., adequately attenuate) the U-NII-1 to U-NII-2A frequency spectrum.


In some applications the antennas 225, 245 may be a common antenna, in which case the coexistence filters 220, 240 perform the function of a diplexer. In some applications, processing functions required by the transceivers 210, 230 may be performed by a common processor.



FIG. 3 is a chart 300 of idealized characteristics of exemplary coexistence filters for the communications device 200 of FIG. 2. The U-NII-1 to U-NII-8 frequency ranges are identified for reference.


The solid curve 310 is a plot of idealized characteristics of a U-NII-1 to U-NII-2A coexistence filter. The U-NII-1 to U-NII-2A coexistence filter has a pass-band from less than 5.15 GHz to 5.34 GHz and a stop-band from 5.48 GHz to greater than 7.125 GHz. In this example, the input/output transfer function (S2,1) of the filters is required to be greater than −3 dB in the pass-band and less than −50 dB in the stop-band. These requirements are exemplary and specific applications may have other requirements.


The dashed curve 320 is a plot of idealized characteristics of a U-NII-2C to U-NII-8 coexistence filter. The U-NII-2C to U-NII-8 coexistence filter has a pass-band from 5.48 GHz to at least 7.125 GHz and a stop-band from 5.34 GHz to less than 5.15 GHz. In this example, the input/output transfer function (S2,1) of the filters is required to be greater than −3 dB in the pass-band and less than −50 dB in the stop-band. These requirements are exemplary and specific applications may have other requirements.


The width of the pass-band of the U-NII-2C to U-NII-8 coexistence filter is 1645 MHz, which is 26% of its center frequency of 6300 MHz. A bandpass filter with 26% fractional bandwidth may be implemented using transversely-excited film bulk acoustic resonators (XBARs). For example, co-pending patent application Ser. No. 17/189,246, titled SPLIT-LADDER BAND N77 FILTER USING TRANSVERSELY-EXCITED FILM BULK ACOUSTIC RESONATORS, describes an XBAR bandpass filter with 24% fractional bandwidth for 5G NR band n77. A similar filter may be shifted in frequency and optimized for the U-NII-2C to U-NII-8 coexistence filter.


Portable communications devices are increasingly using multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) radio architectures to increase communications bandwidth. MIMO radios use multiple receive channels and/or multiple transmit channels within a common frequency band. MIMO radios are commonly described as M×N, where M is the number of receive channels and N is the number of transmit channels. For example, the communications device of FIG. 2 could be described as two 1×1 MIMO radios since there is only a single transmit channel and a single receive channel in each frequency range. MIMO radio architectures currently in use include 2×2 (two receive and two transmit channels), 4×2 (four receive and two transmit channels) and 4×4 (four receive and four transmit channels).



FIG. 4 is a block diagram of portions of another communications device 400 capable of concurrent communications in two portions of the U-NII spectrum. Specifically, the communications device 400 includes a 4×4 MIMO radio 410 for communications in the U-NII-1 to U-NII-2A spectrum and a 4×4 MIMO radio 430 for concurrent communications in the U-NII-2C to U-NII-8 spectrum.


The U-NII-1 to U-NII-2A radio 410 includes a U-NII-1 to U-NII-2A transmit/receive (TRX) processor 412 and four channels. Each channel includes a respective U-NII-1 to U-NII-2A RF front end (RFFE) 415A, 415B, 415C, 415D coupled to a respective antenna 425A, 425B, 425C, 425D via a respective U-NII-1 to U-NII-2A coexistence filter (CF) 420A, 420B, 420C, 420D. The U-NII-1 to U-NII-2A transmit/receive (TRX) processor 412 may include, for example, various processors and processing functions such as one or more digital signal processors and a processor performing a media access control (MAC) function. Each U-NII-1 to U-NII-2A RF front end (RFFE) 415A, 415B, 415C, 415D may include a power amplifier, a low noise amplifier, a transmit/receive switch, and D/A and A/D converters.


The U-NII-2C to U-NII-8 radio 430 includes a U-NII-2C to U-NII-8 TRX processor 432 and four channels. Each channel includes a respective U-NII-2C to U-NII-8 RF front end 435A, 435B, 435C, 435D coupled to a respective antenna 445A, 445B, 445C, 445D via a respective U-NII-2C to U-NII-8 coexistence filter 440A, 440B, 440C, 440D. The U-NII-2C to U-NII-8 transmit/receive (TRX) processor 432 may include, for example, various processors and processing functions such as one or more digital signal processors and a processor performing a media access control (MAC) function. Each U-NII-2C to U-NII-8 RF front end 435A, 435B, 435C, 435D may include a power amplifier, a low noise amplifier, a transmit/receive switch, and D/A and A/D converters.


In some applications some or all of the antennas 425A-D, 445A-D may be common to both the U-NII-1 to U-NII-2A and U-NII-2C to U-NII-8 transceivers, in which case the respective coexistence filters 420A-D, 440A-D act as diplexers. In some applications, processing functions required by the transceivers 410, 430 may be performed, at least in part, by one or more common processors. In radio configurations, such as 4×2 MIMO, where some channels are only used for reception, the corresponding RFFE will not include a power amplifier or A/D converter.


Closing Comments

Throughout this description, the embodiments and examples shown should be considered as exemplars, rather than limitations on the apparatus and procedures disclosed or claimed. Although many of the examples presented herein involve specific combinations of method acts or system elements, it should be understood that those acts and those elements may be combined in other ways to accomplish the same objectives. With regard to flowcharts, additional and fewer steps may be taken, and the steps as shown may be combined or further refined to achieve the methods described herein. Acts, elements and features discussed only in connection with one embodiment are not intended to be excluded from a similar role in other embodiments.


As used herein, “plurality” means two or more. As used herein, a “set” of items may include one or more of such items. As used herein, whether in the written description or the claims, the terms “comprising”, “including”, “carrying”, “having”, “containing”, “involving”, and the like are to be understood to be open-ended, i.e., to mean including but not limited to. Only the transitional phrases “consisting of” and “consisting essentially of”, respectively, are closed or semi-closed transitional phrases with respect to claims. Use of ordinal terms such as “first”, “second”, “third”, etc., in the claims to modify a claim element does not by itself connote any priority, precedence, or order of one claim element over another or the temporal order in which acts of a method are performed, but are used merely as labels to distinguish one claim element having a certain name from another element having a same name (but for use of the ordinal term) to distinguish the claim elements. As used herein, “and/or” means that the listed items are alternatives, but the alternatives also include any combination of the listed items.

Claims
  • 1. A communications device, comprising: an unlicensed national information infrastructure frequency range 1 (U-NII-1) to U-NII-2A transceiver coupled to a first antenna through a U-NII-1 to U-NII-2A coexistence filter; anda U-NII-2C to U-NII-8 transceiver coupled to a second antenna through a U-NII-2C to U-NII-8 coexistence filter,wherein a subrange of U-NII-2B defines an unused frequency spectrum of the communication device between the subrange U-NII-2A and the subrange U-NII-2C such that the respective coexistence filters are configured for concurrently filtering signals in the U-NII-1/U-NII-2A spectrum and the U-NII-2C to U-NII-8 spectrum.
  • 2. The communications device of claim 1, wherein the U-NII-1 to U-NII-2A transceiver operates over a frequency range of 5.15 GHz to 5.34 GHz, andU-NII-2C to U-NII-8 transceiver operates over a frequency range of 5.48 GHz to 7.125 GHz.
  • 3. The communications device of claim 1, wherein the U-NII-1 to U-NII-2A coexistence filter has a pass-band from 5.15 GHz to 5.34 GHZ, and a stop-band from 5.48 GHz to 7.125 GHz.
  • 4. The communications device of claim 3, wherein an input-output transfer function of the U-NII-1 to U-NII-2A coexistence filter is greater than or equal to −3 dB over a frequency range of 5.15 GHz to 5.34 GHZ, and less than or equal to −50 dB over a frequency range of 5.48 GHz to 7.125 GHz.
  • 5. The communications device of claim 1, wherein the U-NII-2C to U-NII-8 coexistence filter has a pass-band from 5.48 GHz to 7.125 GHZ, and a stop-band from 5.15 GHz to 5.34 GHz.
  • 6. The communications device of claim 5, wherein an input-output transfer function of the U-NII-2C to U-NII-8 coexistence filter is greater than or equal to −3 dB over a frequency range of 5.48 GHz to 7.125 GHZ, and less than or equal to −50 dB over a frequency range of 5.15 GHz to 5.34 GHz.
  • 7. The communications device of claim 1, wherein the U-NII-2C to U-NII-8 coexistence filter comprises a plurality of transversely-excited film bulk acoustic resonators (XBARs).
  • 8. The communication device of claim 1, wherein the first antenna and the second antenna are the same.
  • 9. A communications device, comprising: an unlicensed national information infrastructure frequency range 1 (U-NII-1) to U-NII-2A multiple input, multiple output (MIMO) radio comprising one to four channels, each channel comprising a respective radio frequency front end (RFFE) coupled to a respective antenna through a respective U-NII-1 to U-NII-2A coexistence filter; anda U-NII-2C to U-NII-8 MIMO radio comprising one to four channels, each channel comprising a respective radio frequency front end (RFFE) coupled to a respective antenna through a respective U-NII-2C to U-NII-8 coexistence filterwherein a subrange of U-NII-2B defines an unused frequency spectrum of the communication device between the subrange U-NII-2A and the subrange U-NII-2C such that the respective MIMO radios are configured for concurrently filtering signals in the U-NII-1/U-NII-2A spectrum and the U-NII-2C to U-NII-8 spectrum.
  • 10. The communications device of claim 9, wherein the U-NII-1 to U-NII-2A MIMO radio operates over a frequency range of 5.15 GHz to 5.34 GHz, andU-NII-2C to U-NII-8 MIMO radio operates over a frequency range of 5.48 GHz to 7.125 GHz.
  • 11. The communications device of claim 9, wherein each U-NII-1 to U-NII-2A coexistence filter has a pass-band from 5.15 GHz to 5.34 GHz, and a stop-band from 5.48 GHz to 7.125 GHz.
  • 12. The communications device of claim 11, wherein an input-output transfer function of each U-NII-1 to U-NII-2A coexistence filter is greater than or equal to −3 dB over a frequency range of 5.15 GHz to 5.34 GHz, and less than or equal to −50 dB over a frequency range of 5.48 GHz to 7.125 GHz.
  • 13. The communications device of claim 9, wherein each U-NII-2C to U-NII-8 coexistence filter has a pass-band from 5.48 GHz to 7.125 GHz, and a stop-band from 5.15 GHz to 5.34 GHz.
  • 14. The communications device of claim 13, wherein an input-output transfer function of each U-NII-2C to U-NII-8 coexistence filter is greater than or equal to −3 dB over a frequency range of 5.48 GHz to 7.125 GHZ, and less than or equal to −50 dB over a frequency range of 5.15 GHz to 5.34 GHz.
  • 15. The communications device of claim 9, wherein each U-NII-2C to U-NII-8 coexistence filter comprises a plurality of transversely-excited film bulk acoustic resonators (XBARs).
RELATED APPLICATION INFORMATION

This patent claims priority from provisional patent application 63/249,572, filed Sep. 29, 2021, entitled RECEIVER WITH U-NII-2C THRU U-NII-8 BAND PASS FILTER.

US Referenced Citations (165)
Number Name Date Kind
5274345 Gau Dec 1993 A
5446330 Eda et al. Aug 1995 A
5552655 Stokes et al. Sep 1996 A
5726610 Allen et al. Mar 1998 A
5853601 Krishaswamy Dec 1998 A
6377140 Ehara et al. Apr 2002 B1
6516503 Ikada et al. Feb 2003 B1
6540827 Levy et al. Apr 2003 B1
6570470 Maehara et al. May 2003 B2
6707229 Martin Mar 2004 B1
6710514 Ikada et al. Mar 2004 B2
6833774 Abbott et al. Dec 2004 B2
7345400 Nakao et al. Mar 2008 B2
7463118 Jacobsen Dec 2008 B2
7535152 Ogami et al. May 2009 B2
7684109 Godshalk et al. Mar 2010 B2
7728483 Tanaka Jun 2010 B2
7868519 Umeda Jan 2011 B2
7941103 Iwamoto et al. May 2011 B2
7965015 Tai et al. Jun 2011 B2
8278802 Lee et al. Oct 2012 B1
8294330 Abbott et al. Oct 2012 B1
8344815 Yamanaka et al. Jan 2013 B2
8816567 Zuo et al. Aug 2014 B2
8829766 Milyutin et al. Sep 2014 B2
8932686 Hayakawa et al. Jan 2015 B2
9093979 Wang Jul 2015 B2
9112134 Takahashi Aug 2015 B2
9130145 Martin et al. Sep 2015 B2
9148121 Inoue Sep 2015 B2
9219466 Meltaus et al. Dec 2015 B2
9276557 Nordquist et al. Mar 2016 B1
9369105 Li et al. Jun 2016 B1
9425765 Rinaldi Aug 2016 B2
9525398 Olsson Dec 2016 B1
9640750 Nakanishi et al. May 2017 B2
9748923 Kando et al. Aug 2017 B2
9762202 Thalmayr et al. Sep 2017 B2
9780759 Kimura et al. Oct 2017 B2
9837984 Khlat et al. Dec 2017 B2
10079414 Guyette et al. Sep 2018 B2
10187039 Komatsu et al. Jan 2019 B2
10200013 Bower et al. Feb 2019 B2
10211806 Bhattacharjee Feb 2019 B2
10284176 Solal May 2019 B1
10491192 Plesski et al. Nov 2019 B1
10601392 Plesski et al. Mar 2020 B2
10637438 Garcia et al. Apr 2020 B2
10644674 Takamine May 2020 B2
10756697 Plesski et al. Aug 2020 B2
10790802 Yantchev et al. Sep 2020 B2
10797675 Plesski Oct 2020 B2
10812048 Nosaka Oct 2020 B2
10819309 Turner et al. Oct 2020 B1
10826462 Plesski et al. Nov 2020 B2
10868510 Yantchev et al. Dec 2020 B2
10868512 Garcia et al. Dec 2020 B2
10868513 Yantchev Dec 2020 B2
10911017 Plesski Feb 2021 B2
10911021 Turner et al. Feb 2021 B2
10911023 Turner Feb 2021 B2
10917070 Plesski et al. Feb 2021 B2
10917072 McHugh et al. Feb 2021 B2
10985726 Plesski Apr 2021 B2
10985728 Plesski et al. Apr 2021 B2
10985730 Garcia Apr 2021 B2
10992282 Plesski et al. Apr 2021 B1
10992283 Plesski et al. Apr 2021 B2
10992284 Yantchev Apr 2021 B2
10998877 Turner et al. May 2021 B2
10998882 Yantchev et al. May 2021 B2
11003971 Plesski et al. May 2021 B2
11114996 Plesski et al. Sep 2021 B2
11114998 Garcia et al. Sep 2021 B2
11139794 Plesski et al. Oct 2021 B2
11143561 Plesski Oct 2021 B2
11146231 Plesski Oct 2021 B2
11146232 Yandrapalli et al. Oct 2021 B2
11146238 Hammond et al. Oct 2021 B2
11146244 Yantchev Oct 2021 B2
11159207 Seok Oct 2021 B2
11165407 Yantchev Nov 2021 B2
11171629 Turner Nov 2021 B2
11356127 Hasnain Jun 2022 B2
20020079986 Ruby et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020130736 Mukai Sep 2002 A1
20020158714 Kaitila et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020189062 Lin et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030080831 Segovia Fernandez et al. May 2003 A1
20030199105 Kub et al. Oct 2003 A1
20040041496 Imai et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040100164 Murata May 2004 A1
20040261250 Kadota et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050185026 Noguchi et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050218488 Matsuo Oct 2005 A1
20050264136 Tsutsumi et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060152107 Tanaka Jul 2006 A1
20060179642 Kawamura Aug 2006 A1
20070182510 Park Aug 2007 A1
20070188047 Tanaka Aug 2007 A1
20070194863 Shibata et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070267942 Matsumoto et al. Nov 2007 A1
20080246559 Ayazi Oct 2008 A1
20100019866 Hara et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100064492 Tanaka Mar 2010 A1
20100123367 Tai et al. May 2010 A1
20110018389 Fukano et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110018654 Bradley et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110109196 Goto et al. May 2011 A1
20110278993 Iwamoto Nov 2011 A1
20120286900 Kadota et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120326809 Tsuda Dec 2012 A1
20130127551 Yamanaka May 2013 A1
20130234805 Takahashi Sep 2013 A1
20130271238 Onda Oct 2013 A1
20130278609 Stephanou et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130321100 Wang Dec 2013 A1
20140130319 Iwamoto May 2014 A1
20140145556 Kadota May 2014 A1
20140151151 Reinhardt Jun 2014 A1
20140152145 Kando et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140173862 Kando et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140225684 Kando et al. Aug 2014 A1
20150042417 Onodera et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150165479 Lasiter et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150319537 Perois et al. Nov 2015 A1
20150333730 Meltaus et al. Nov 2015 A1
20150365067 Hori et al. Dec 2015 A1
20160028367 Shealy Jan 2016 A1
20160087187 Burak Mar 2016 A1
20160182009 Bhattacharjee Jun 2016 A1
20170063332 Gilbert et al. Mar 2017 A1
20170179225 Kishimoto Jun 2017 A1
20170179928 Raihn et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170214381 Bhattacharjee Jul 2017 A1
20170214387 Burak et al. Jul 2017 A1
20170222617 Mizoguchi Aug 2017 A1
20170222622 Solal et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170370791 Nakamura et al. Dec 2017 A1
20180005950 Watanabe Jan 2018 A1
20180026603 Iwamoto Jan 2018 A1
20180033952 Yamamoto Feb 2018 A1
20180041191 Park Feb 2018 A1
20180062615 Kato et al. Mar 2018 A1
20180062617 Yun et al. Mar 2018 A1
20180123016 Gong May 2018 A1
20180191322 Chang et al. Jul 2018 A1
20180278227 Hurwitz Sep 2018 A1
20190068164 Houlden et al. Feb 2019 A1
20190123721 Takamine Apr 2019 A1
20190131953 Gong May 2019 A1
20190273480 Lin et al. Sep 2019 A1
20190348966 Campanella-Pineda Nov 2019 A1
20190379351 Miyamoto et al. Dec 2019 A1
20190386635 Plesski et al. Dec 2019 A1
20190386636 Plesski et al. Dec 2019 A1
20200007110 Konaka et al. Jan 2020 A1
20200021272 Segovia Fernandez et al. Jan 2020 A1
20200036357 Mimura Jan 2020 A1
20200235719 Yantchev et al. Jul 2020 A1
20200259480 Pensala Aug 2020 A1
20200313645 Caron Oct 2020 A1
20200350891 Turner Nov 2020 A1
20210013859 Turner et al. Jan 2021 A1
20210328574 Garcia Oct 2021 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (2)
Number Date Country
2016017104 Feb 2016 WO
2018003273 Jan 2018 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (31)
Entry
Tho Nguyen, New Rules for Unlicensed National Information Infrastructure (U-NII) Bands KDB 789033, KDB 644545., Oct. 22, 2014, Office of Engineering and Technology Laboratory Division FCC (Year: 2014).
A. C. Guyette, “Theory and Design of Intrinsically Switched Multiplexers With Optimum Phase Linearity,” in IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 61, No. 9, pp. 3254-3264, Sep. 2013, doi: 10.1109/TMTT.2013.2274963. Sep. 2013.
Acoustic Properties of Solids ONDA Corporation 592 Weddell Drive, Sunnyvale, CA 94089, Apr. 11, 2003, pp. 5 (Year 2003). 2003.
Bahreyni, B. Fabrication and Design of Resonant Microdevices Andrew William, Inc. 2018, NY (Year 2008). 2008.
Buchanan “Ceramic Materials for Electronics” 3rd Edition, first published in 2004 by Marcel Dekker, Inc. pp. 496 (Year 2004). 00 Jan. 2004.
Ekeom, D. & Dubus, Bertrand & Volatier, A . . . (2006). Solidly mounted resonator (SMR) FEM-BEM simulation. 1474-1477. 10.1109/ULTSYM.2006.371.
G. Manohar, “Investigation of Various Surface Acoustic Wave Design Configurations for Improved Sensitivity.” Doctoral dissertation, University of South Florida, USA, Jan. 2012, 7 pages.
Kadota et al. “5.4 Ghz Lamb Wave Resonator on LiNbO3 Thin Crystal Plate and Its Application,” published in Japanese Journal of Applied Physics 50 (2011) 07HD11. (Year: 2011) 2011.
M. Kadota, S. Tanaka, “Wideband acoustic wave resonators composed of hetero acoustic layer structure,” Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 57, No. 7S1. Published Jun. 5, 2018. 5 pages.
Material Properties of Tibtech Innovations, © 2018 Tibtech Innovations (Year 2018). 2018.
Merriam Webster, dictionary meaning of the word “diaphragm”, since 1828, Merriam Webster (Year: 1828) 1828.
Mizutaui, K. and Toda, K., “Analysis of lamb wave propagation characteristics in rotated Ycut Xpropagation LiNbO3 plates.” Electron. Comm. Jpn. Pt. 1, 69, No. 4 (1986): 47-55. doi:10.1002/ecja.4410690406.
Moussa et al. Review on Triggered Liposomal Drug Delivery with a Focus on Ultrasound 2015, Bentham Science Publishers, pp. 16 (Year 2005) 2005.
Namdeo et al. “Simulation on Effects of Electrical Loading due to Interdigital Transducers in Surface Acoustic Wave Resonator”, published in Procedia Engineering 64 ( 2013) of Science Direct pp. 322-330 (Year: 2013) 2013.
Naumenko et al., “Optimal orientations of Lithium Niobate for resonator SAW filters”, 2003 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium—pp. 2110-2113. (Year: 2003).
R. Olsson III, K. Hattar et al. “A high electromechanical coupling coefficient SH0 Lamb wave lithiumniobate micromechanical resonator and a method for fabrication” Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, vol. 209, Mar. 1, 2014, pp. 183-190.
Rodriguez-Madrid et al., “Super-High-Frequency SAW Resonators on AIN/Diamond”, IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 33, No. 4, Apr. 2012, pp. 495-497. Year: 2012) 2012.
Safari et al. “Piezoelectric for Transducer Applications” published by Elsevier Science Ltd., pp. 4 (Year: 2000). 2020.
Santosh, G. , Surface acoustic wave devices on silicon using patterned and thin film ZnO, Ph.D. thesis, Feb. 2016, Indian Institute of technology Guwahati, Assam, India Feb. 2016.
Sorokin et al. Study of Microwave Acoustic Attenuation in a Multi-frequency Bulk Acoustic Resonator Based on a Synthetic Diamond Single Crystal Published in Acoustical Physics, vol. 61, No. 6, 2015 pp. 675 (Year 2015) 00 Jan. 2015.
T. Takai, H. Iwamoto, et al., “I.H.P.Saw Technology and its Application to Microacoustic Components (Invited).” 2017 EEE International Ultrasonics Symposium, Sep. 6-9, 2017. pp. 1-8.
USPTO/ISA, International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2019/036433 dated Aug. 29, 2019.
USPTO/ISA, International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2019/058632 dated Jan. 17, 2020.
USPTO/ISA, International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2020/45654 dated Oct. 29, 2020.
USPTO/ISA, International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2021/024824 dated Jul. 27, 2021, 9 total pages.
USPTO/ISA, International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2021/048505 dated Dec. 1, 2021, 11 total pages.
Y. Yang, A. Gao et al. “5 GHZ Lithium Niobate MEMS Resonators With High FOM of 153”, 2017 IEEE 30th International Conference in Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS). Jan. 22-26, 2017. pp. 942-945.
Y. Yang, R. Lu et al. “Towards Ka Band Acoustics: Lithium Niobat Asymmetrical Mode Piezoelectric MEMS Resonators”, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, May 2018. pp. 1-2.
Yanson Yang, Ruochen Lu, Songbin Gong, High Q Antisymmetric Mode Lithium Niobate MEMS Resonators With Spurious Mitigation, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, vol. 29, No. 2, Apr. 2020. Apr. 2, 2020.
Yu-Po Wong, Luyan Qiu, Naoto Matsuoka, Ken-ya Hashimoto, Broadband Piston Mode Operation for First-order Antisymmetric Mode Resonators, 2020 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium, Sep. 2020. Sep. 2020.
Zou, Jie “High-Performance Aluminum Nitride Lamb Wave Resonators for RF Front-End Technology” University of California, Berkeley, Summer 2015, pp. 63 (Year 2015) 00 Jan. 2015.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20230094810 A1 Mar 2023 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
63249572 Sep 2021 US