The present application claims priority of British Patent Application No. 1306148.6, filed Apr. 5, 2013 and British Patent Application No. 1312447.4, filed Jul. 11, 2013, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
This invention relates to a communications system, and in particular to a communications system whereby radio transmissions may be made and received whilst a nearby ECM system is operating to restrict or impair the reception of radio transmissions.
The use of ECM systems, for example by the military, to block the reception of radio transmissions transmitted by other parties is well known. By blocking the reception of radio transmissions in this manner, voice communications can be disrupted, interfering with the transmission of information or instructions, and the remote control of devices such as improvised explosive devices or other remotely detonated explosives can be disrupted. Clearly, the disruption of the detonation of improvised, or other, explosive devices is beneficial in that the risk of injury to military personnel or civilians or damage to property and equipment is reduced, and disrupting the reception of voice communications can hamper organisation of personnel.
Whilst the use of ECM systems is beneficial in that it can disrupt voice communications or the reception of control signals transmitted by other parties, it has the disadvantage that communications by those operating the ECM system are also disrupted. It is desirable to provide a communications system whereby radio communications, either for voice or data transmission, can continue to be received by a party using an ECM system whilst that system is operative and without introducing vulnerabilities such as frequency gaps into the ECM transmission.
According to the present invention there is provided a communications system comprising an ECM signal transmission arrangement for generating and transmitting an ECM signal, a first controller operable to control the ECM transmission arrangement such that the transmitted signal takes a pulsed form including a plurality of first periods in which the ECM signal is transmitted separated by second periods in which the ECM signal is not transmitted, a radio signal receiver arrangement including or forming a bandpass filter and arranged to receive a radio signal, and a second controller operable such that during a plurality of third periods the radio signal is processed by at least part of the radio receiver arrangement, the third periods being separated by fourth periods in which the radio receiver arrangement does not process the radio signal, wherein the first and second controllers are synchronised such that the second periods are synchronised with the third periods, at the radio signal receiver arrangement.
By way of example, the second controller may be operable to control the signal received by the receiver arrangement so that the signal takes a pulsed form including a plurality of third periods in which the radio signal is received by the receiver arrangement separated by fourth periods in which the radio receiver does not receive the radio signal. Alternatively, the signal received by the receiver arrangement may be modified, within the receiver arrangement under the control of the second controller, so that at least part of the receiver arrangement only processes those parts of the signal received during the third periods.
It has been found that where a pulsed radio signal is passed through a bandpass filter, provided the repetition rate of the pulsed signal is greater than the bandwidth of the filter, any radio frequencies present in the pulsed signal that lie within the filter bandwidth will, in effect, be joined up and emerge from the filter as a continuous, albeit weaker, signal. Any typical radio receiver is, in effect, a tuneable bandpass filter. Accordingly, by transmitting a pulsed ECM signal, and controlling the operation of the radio signal receiver arrangement in such a manner as to receive only the signal present between pulses of the ECM signal, the pulsed signal received by the radio signal receiver arrangement can be reconstituted back into a continuous signal free from ECM interference simply by the passage of the pulsed, received signal through the radio's bandpass filter. Little modification of a typical receiver is required to allow operation thereof in accordance with the invention. Furthermore, the transmitter used to transmit the radio signal needs no modification.
The first periods may be equal in length, and the second periods equal in length, thereby defining a fixed pulse rate. Alternatively, the first and/or second periods may be of varying length, thereby defining a variable pulse rate. In either case, the pulse rate is conveniently greater than the bandwidth of the bandpass filter. It is preferably significantly greater than the bandwidth of the bandpass filter, for example it may be several times the bandwidth of the bandpass filter.
It is advantageous for the second periods to be of relatively short duration to minimise the impact on the average power and effectiveness of the ECM transmission. However, as this also requires the third periods to be short, this negatively impacts upon the received radio signal level. There is thus a trade-off between effectiveness of the ECM system and received radio signal strength. It is envisaged that operation of the communications system in such a manner that the second periods are approximately ⅛ of the length of the first periods would provide an adequate balance between the effectiveness of the ECM system and the received signal strength. This ratio may be adjusted according to operational circumstances.
The first and second controllers may form part of a single control unit. This is convenient where the ECM transmission arrangement and the radio signal receiver arrangement are adjacent one another. However, this need not always be the case. Provided adequate synchronisation can be maintained, for example by the use of a GPS based timing signal, the ECM transmission arrangement and the radio signal receiver arrangement may be spaced apart. For example, the radio signal receiver arrangement could be a mobile, possibly hand held, unit, capable of use at locations remote from the ECM transmission arrangement. The technique can also be extended to protect multiple radio receivers.
The invention will further be described, by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Referring to the accompanying drawings, a communications system is illustrated which comprises an ECM signal transmission system 10 including an ECM signal generation device 12 operable to output an ECM signal 14 (see
Whilst a simple switch 22 is illustrated, it will be appreciated that the function thereof may, in reality, be achieved in a number of ways. The switch function may also be integrated into the ECM system 12.
The shape of the waveform 26 is selected to ensure that the ECM signal 14 is transmitted for the majority of the time. It is envisaged that it will be transmitted for at least ⅞ of the time, but it will be appreciated that the invention is not restricted in this regard and that a wide range of other options are available without departing from the scope of the invention.
The communications system further comprises a radio signal receiver arrangement 30 including a typical radio receiver device 32 operable to demodulate a received signal in the usual manner. The control system 18 includes a second controller 34 operable to modify a received signal before the signal is supplied to the device 32.
The operation of the control system 18, and the use of a single waveform 26 in the control thereof, is such that the third periods 40a in which the received signal is passed to the device 32 are synchronised with the second periods 28b in which no ECM signal is transmitted. Accordingly, the signal received by the device 32 does not include an ECM component.
In addition to the switch 36, the second controller 34 includes a low noise amplifier 44, located upstream of the switch 36, to boost the incoming signal level and so compensate, at least in part, for some of the losses which will be experienced during subsequent parts of the processing. Downstream of the switch 36 is located a fast electronic attenuator 46 to allow shaping of the signal envelope passed to the device 32 (described in further detail below).
The radio receiver device 32 is shown much simplified in
The switch 36 is ideally of fast acting form, thereby minimising the amount of signal loss whilst ensuring that the ECM signal is fully removed from the signal passed to the device 32. To further ensure that the ECM signal is fully removed. the switch 36 should preferably be of high-isolation form.
The use of switch 36 alone to divide an incoming radio signal into rectangular pulses will cause spectral spreading, creating numerous weaker images or copies of the radio signal spaced in frequency at multiples of the pulse rate Thus, as shown in
As illustrated in
The arrangement of the invention thus allows communication to be maintained in areas in which an ECM system is in use. It can be used despite the use of a strong ECM jamming signal, strong enough to swamp the required radio signal, even where the jamming signal and the required radio signal are on the same frequency.
It will be appreciated that the communications system may be used in the transmission of voice signals or data signals, so long as the radio filter bandwidth is less than the signal pulse rate. It requires no modification to the transmitter used to transmit the subsequently received signal, and requires only limited modification of a typical radio receiver device.
Many of the components in the second controller 34 can be integrated directly into the receive path within radio 32, typically located immediately preceding filter 32a. This arrangement can allow some simplification of the design. For example, relays 50, 52 and bypass path 48 would not be required as the components are no longer in the transmit signal path, and low-noise amplifier 44 is likely to already be present at the front end of any typical radio receiver design.
Furthermore, in a software-based radio many of the components can be conveniently implemented in the radio's digital signal processing. Such a radio uses an analogue-to-digital converter to translate the incoming radio signal into a stream of data values that are then filtered and demodulated by a digital processing system. Switch 36 and attenuator 46 could be implemented as a digital multiplier immediately after the analogue-to-digital converter, multiplying each incoming data value by a value X that varies between 0 and 1. During each fourth period X is set to 0 to suppress incoming signal data, and during each third period X is set to 1 to allow signal data through unaltered. X may also be cycled smoothly between 0 and 1 using a mathematical function as described earlier to minimise any co-site interference effects. The resulting bursts of data are joined up by the subsequent digital filters in exactly the same manner as described earlier.
In the description hereinbefore, the controller 18 operates to control the signal supplied to the radio receiver arrangement 30, removing or attenuating those parts of the received signal including the transmitted ECM signal. In an alternative arrangement, the radio receiver arrangement 30 may be arranged to receive the complete received signal, including the pulses or periods during which the ECM signal is transmitted, avoiding the need to provide the switch 36 and attenuator 46. The radio receiver arrangement 30 may instead be controlled in such a manner that the pulses or periods containing the ECM signal are ignored by, for example, the final IF filter and/or demodulator of the radio receiver arrangement 30, recovering and demodulating the received signal only during the pulses or periods in which the ECM signal is not transmitted. Any suitable filtering technique may be used to recover the signal carrier and compensate for the periods during which the ECM containing pulses are being ignored. A suitable timing signal may be used to control the operation of the controller 18 in such an arrangement.
Such an arrangement would most likely be achieved by appropriate programming of a software based radio device.
Whilst in the description hereinbefore the controller 18 is described and illustrated as a separate component, this need not be the case and its functionality could be incorporated into the ECM signal transmission arrangement 10 and/or the radio signal receiver arrangement 30. Moreover the controller 18 could be divided into two parts, one controlling the ECM arrangement 10 and one controlling the radio receiver arrangement 30, and will operate correctly so long as the two parts remain synchronised.
The precise timing of the various control pulses described above may be individually adjusted and optimised to compensate for component response times and/or propagation delays in interconnecting cables. Moreover, where the ECM signal transmission arrangement 10 and radio signal receiver arrangement 30 are spaced apart from one another by a significant distance then signal propagation times could result in misalignment of the various timing periods and undesirable inclusion of part of the ECM signal into the pulsed signal passed to the device 32. Rather than have the control signals exactly synchronised, it may be preferred to have them slightly displaced from one another to compensate for such propagation delays. If the elements of the system are in fixed locations, then the delays may be fixed and built into the system. Alternatively, particularly if one or other of the elements of the system is mobile, then the GPS system or similar used to maintain synchronisation may also be used to provide position information which can then be used in the calculation of a timing offset by which the pulses are displaced relative to one another to compensate for the spacing of the elements. Alternatively it may be possible to manually adjust the displacement until a clear demodulated signal is received, or to employ an automated adaptive algorithm to monitor the received signal quality and adjust the displacement to maintain optimum performance.
As outlined earlier, there is a trade-off between ECM transmission and radio signal level. A first/second period ratio of 8/1 has been suggested for typical operation. This ratio may be adjusted manually during operation to increase the radio signal level at the expense of ECM signal level, for example to increase communication performance in an emergency situation. Various mechanisms may also be devised for automatic adjustment of this ratio; for example the second period ratio may be automatically increased for a period of time following a radio transmission to increase the receive signal strength in anticipation of a response.
In the arrangement described hereinbefore, the pulses are evenly, regularly spaced with the result that a fixed pulse rate is used. This need not be the case and arrangements in which a variable pulse rate is used are envisaged. A variable pseudo-random pulse rate will make the timing of the pulses unpredictable, helping to disguise the technique and also providing a degree of security and privacy as only radio controllers using exactly the same pseudo-random algorithm and key as the ECM controller will be able to receive communication free of the ECM signal. In such arrangements, as with the arrangement outlined hereinbefore, it is important to ensure that the required level of synchronisation is maintained, adjusted to compensate for position, etc, if required, and to ensure that the pulse rate is maintained at a level greater than the filter bandwidth.
The invention can also be used in conjunction with a responsive (or reactive) ECM system. A typical responsive ECM system contains an internal radio receiver, and pauses its ECM transmission at regular intervals to allow this receiver to scan the radio spectrum. In this arrangement, to allow the ECM system to receive without disturbance, the controller 24 will hold switch 22 closed whenever the ECM system is in its receive mode. As the ECM transmission is inherently absent during these receive periods, switch 36 may also be kept closed to maximise the radio signal level.
The invention as described hereinbefore is advantageous in that it allows a radio receiver in the vicinity of an ECM transmitter to receive signals transmitted from remotely located transmitters without requiring modification of the remote equipment. Whilst modification of the remote equipment may not be necessary, there may be circumstances in which it is desired. For example, by synchronising the operation of both the transmitter and receiver with the operation of the ECM transmitter, taking into account location and propagation times, packets of data could be transmitted, or other transmissions made, during the pulses or periods when the ECM signal is not being transmitted. The frequencies at which the transmissions are made could be varied, for example for security purposes, by appropriate frequency hopping, or they could be transmitted on a fixed frequency.
It will be appreciated that a wide range of modifications and alterations may be made to the arrangements described hereinbefore without departing from the scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims. For example, whilst the description hereinbefore relates primarily to the transmission of signals between just two locations, it will be appreciated that the system may be used between more locations than this, provided the second controllers at each location are synchronised, appropriate compensation being made for propagation times, etc.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1306148.6 | Apr 2013 | GB | national |
1312447.4 | Jul 2013 | GB | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
7826839 | Nicholas | Nov 2010 | B1 |
20040214520 | Jung | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20070116093 | Karlsson | May 2007 | A1 |
20110223851 | Stoddard | Sep 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1471650 | Oct 2004 | EP |
06331730 | Dec 1994 | JP |
2008025427 | Mar 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
British Search Report for Application No. GB1306148.6 dated Sep. 30, 2013. |
European Search Report for Application No. 14163533 dated Jul. 4, 2014. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160294501 A1 | Oct 2016 | US |