The present invention generally relates to light-emitting diodes (LEDs), and more particularly, to the design of a lighting apparatus and lighting system using such in a manner that maximizes the benefits of LEDs to satisfy difficult lighting requirements.
By now it is well known that the use of LEDs in general lighting applications yields substantial benefits: long operating life, high efficacy, and precise control of light are at the forefront. However, it is also well known that to get the most out of LEDs a number of factors must be considered: temperature (both ambient and junction) and luminaire design, for example. LEDs are quickly becoming the light source of choice for architectural or aesthetic lighting applications (e.g., façade lighting, holiday lighting, indoor track lighting, etc.), but their usefulness in long-term, large-scale lighting applications has been more slowly realized. This is due, at least in part, to the tremendous efforts needed to control such things as ambient and junction temperature, as well as the efficiency of the luminaire design. In essence, because the benefits of operating LEDs are so closely coupled to the particulars of the lighting application, there is no such thing as a standard large-scale LED lighting fixture. Couple this with only a rudimentary understanding the industry has of how long LEDs can be operated effectively, and it can be seen that there is significant room for improvement in the art.
Consider an outdoor bridge spanning some length and accommodating some number of lanes of traffic in both directions; assume this bridge is used heavily both day and night. For the safety of nighttime drivers, the road on the bridge must be illuminated; here lies an application that exemplifies the challenges faced by today's lighting designers. Cost effectiveness suggests lighting fixtures should be affixed to existing structural features (e.g., to avoid the cost of support structures and the cost to shut down multiple lanes of traffic to erect said structures); however, mounting height and aiming of said fixtures must be considered so not to cause glare or create other adverse driving conditions (the difficulty of which is exacerbated because traffic flows in both directions). The lighting designer must take into account placement of the fixtures, weight of the fixtures, and outward design of the fixtures to ensure both adequate distribution of light on and about the target area, and distribution of stresses on the poles (e.g., because of wind loading). At all times, there are competing design considerations. For example, LEDs offer the benefit of long life (a boon to cost effectiveness), but must be used in great quantity to produce the light needed (a detriment to cost effectiveness). A plurality of light sources means the composite light projected therefrom can be precisely controlled to suit the target area, but it also means additional optical elements for each light source (adding to the cost and weight of each fixture).
Additionally, there is a vested interest in designing the lighting system at the onset for long-term use; in the aforementioned example, it is simply not economically feasible to shut down multiple lanes of traffic over the life of the system to perform maintenance, re-lamp, etc. Thus, LEDs are a natural choice; their long life removes some concerns with long-term maintenance. However, because LEDs have such a long life they have not been fully tested; thus, there are no definitive answers as to how long LEDs can operate and how severely the light output will degrade over time due to thermal losses and lumen depreciation (not to mention initial efficiency losses due to driver inefficiencies and luminaire design). The Illuminating Engineering Society of North America (IESNA) has recently recommended standards for testing LEDs (see IES LM-79) and measuring lumen depreciation (see IES LM-80), but the scope is limited and does not define or provide estimations for the lifespan of LEDs.
The art is at a loss; in the time it would take to fully test an LED, the technology will have advanced and the data will not be particularly useful. In the meantime, there are lighting applications that may benefit from the long life of LEDs provided that long life can be assured. What is needed are means for reasonably assuring the long life of LEDs in a manner that is reliable and, unlike current maintenance strategies, cost-effective for applications like the aforementioned bridge. Further, what is needed are means for reasonably assuring an acceptable light level over said life; there is little benefit to maintaining an LED lighting system long-term if the light is allowed to degrade to the point of uselessness. Still further, what is needed is a standardized approach to developing large-scale LED fixtures—particularly ones for outdoor use—that can be used with said means for assuring the long life of LEDs so to address current needs. Thus, there is room for improvement in the art.
Light-emitting diodes (LEDs) are an attractive alternative to traditional light sources (e.g., metal halide, incandescent, fluorescent, high pressure sodium) for many applications for a variety of reasons, particularly applications where long life is desirable. That being said, many large-scale outdoor lighting applications are based on a budget and the budget assumes a certain number of operating hours before maintenance is performed or before the system has reached its end-of-life (EOL). This is problematic because the longevity of LEDs is highly dependent on operating conditions—many of which cannot be closely controlled—thus limiting the ability to predict or assure a certain number of operating hours. Further, LEDs are not fully characterized so their behavior long-term is not well understood.
It is therefore a principle object, feature, advantage, or aspect of the present invention to improve over the state of the art and/or address problems, issues, or deficiencies in the art.
According to the present invention, a lighting system is provided whereby a number of operating hours can be reasonably ensured for a particular combination of LED and fixture. Through the envisioned power compensation methodology and effective luminaire design, a relatively constant light level can be assured for the defined lifespan of the system; this is true even if operating conditions change, the known behavior of LEDs proves untrue over untested periods of time, or some other condition occurs which would otherwise cause EOL prematurely and prevent the system from meeting the desired number of operating hours.
Further objects, features, advantages, or aspects of the present invention may include one or more of the following:
These and other objects, features, advantages, or aspects of the present invention will become more apparent with reference to the accompanying specification and claims.
From time-to-time in this description reference will be taken to the drawings which are identified by figure number and are summarized below.
To further an understanding of the present invention, specific exemplary embodiments according to the present invention will be described in detail. Frequent mention will be made in this description to the drawings. Reference numbers will be used to indicate certain parts in the drawings. The same reference numbers will be used to indicate the same parts throughout the drawings.
Envisioned are apparatus, methods, and systems for reasonably ensuring operation of a large-scale outdoor LED lighting system over a defined period of time at a relatively constant light level. LEDs offer many benefits including long operating life, RoHS and LEED compliance, no restrike downtime, good color stability even across dimming levels, and high efficacy to name a few. That being said, it is to be understood that aspects of the present invention could be applied to other lighting applications, other types of light sources, and the like. Further, while a variety of options and alternatives have been laid out, these are not to be considered limiting or all-encompassing.
It is believed that a comprehensive understanding of the present invention is best achieved by first understanding the components which, along with the envisioned methodology, form the envisioned long-term LED lighting system; the remaining Specification is laid out as such, but is not intended to imply a specific assembly order or sequencing of events unless otherwise stated.
Regarding terminology, it is to be understood that the terms “luminaire” and “fixture” are used interchangeably in this Specification and are intended to encompass the sum of modules and associated exterior components. A grouping of luminaires or fixtures (typically on the same elevating structure) are referred to as an array, whereas the term “lighting system” refers to the sum of luminaires or fixtures, elevating structures, means for affixing luminaires or fixtures to elevating structures, power regulating components, control components, and the like. The term “reasonably ensure” is used throughout this Specification and is intended to mean assurance or near assurance of a condition, event, or the like except in cases of extreme operating conditions (e.g., driving LEDs far beyond rated capacities), extreme environmental conditions (e.g., blizzards), acts of God (e.g., earthquakes), or the like. The term “relatively constant light” is used throughout this Specification and is intended to mean light that is perceived by the average human eye as constant, regardless of whether said light is constant from a lumen output standpoint. Lastly, the terms “beam output pattern”, “beam pattern”, “output pattern”, “light pattern”, “beam output”, and “light output pattern” are used interchangeably in this Specification and are intended to define the shape, size, and/or nature of light emitted from a source. In some cases said source may comprise a single LED and in others cases said source may comprise a single fixture which houses a plurality of LEDs and associated devices which shape the light projected therefrom; when juxtaposed, the beams are often referred to as “individual” and “composite”, respectively.
A. LED Modules
At the core of the envisioned LED lighting system is a number of LED modules. As can be seen from
As envisioned, housing 300 is designed as the anchor point for LED module 10. For example, if an LED fails, the bolts can be removed from holes 301, the wiring cut, the defective board removed, a new board 200 seated against surface 302, the wiring reconnected via poke-in connector 202, and the bolts through holes 301 re-secured; this can occur rapidly and without disturbing the precise alignment of pivot joint 100 or orientation of lens 400. Alternatively, if a lens needs to be replaced (e.g., to effect a different beam output pattern), visor 500 can be removed by removing thread cutting screws from now threaded holes 305, the old lens removed, a new lens 400 seated in aperture 303 of surface 306, and the visor re-secured via the thread cutting screws through aperture 501 and into threaded holes 305; this can occur rapidly and without disturbing LED 201 or the alignment of pivot joint 100.
The exact design of lens 400 will vary depending on the application, the aiming of a particular module 10, the number and layout of LEDs 201 on board 200, and the desired beam output, for example. In practice, every LED module 10 could have a different lens 400, which may require a variety of sizes and shapes of aperture 303 in housing 300 and aperture 505 in visor 500. As an example, for the board illustrated in
In practice, visor 500 could be molded or otherwise formed from black polycarbonate and then surface 507 metallized (e.g., using aluminum in finish MT-11000 available from Mold-Tech, Windsor, Ontario, Canada). Alternatively, visor 500 could be formed from a high reflectivity material (e.g., polished aluminum) and all surfaces other than 507 blackened; or visor 500 could be formed from a low cost polymer, blackened, and a strip of high reflectivity material inserted into visor 500 so to produce surface 507. If feasible, all components of module 10 other than reflective surface 507, lens 400, and LED 201 could be blackened. Surface 507 itself may be coated, peened, or otherwise formed so to provide specular, diffuse, spread, or any other nature of reflection as necessitated by the application.
As with lens 400, the exact design of visor 500 can vary according to the application, desired beam output, and aiming of module 10. For example, a visor could have two long sides (see reference number 503) or two short sides (see reference number 504). Visor 500 could be longer or shorter than illustrated (the visor illustrated in
Of course, other designs of pivot joint are possible, and envisioned.
Regardless of the precise design of pivot joint 100, it is beneficial if the joint (i) establishes a thermal dissipation path between module 10 and the fixture housing, (ii) permits a wide range of aiming angles of module 10, (iii) allows for rapid and easy assembly, and (iv) is compact in design so to allow a more efficient packing of modules 10 in a fixture.
B. LED Fixtures
As envisioned, some number of LED modules 10 are aimed and installed in a fixture, the fixture also aimed and installed (usually on a pole or other elevating structure); the exact number of modules and the aiming positions of each can vary according to the application, size of the fixture, composite beam output pattern, and the like. Discussed first are the mechanics of installing modules in a fixture housing, followed by a description of one possible way to design a composite beam output to suit an application and one possible way to aim a fixture and the modules therein so to achieve the composite beam output.
Each LED fixture is designed to contain one or more module bars 50 (see
An exemplary design of module bar 50 is illustrated in
An exemplary design of reflector housing 60 is illustrated in
As stated, the precise design of each LED fixture will vary depending on many factors. However, regardless of the design of the fixture, the nature of the application, or other such factors, the exemplary approach to building the fixture to suit the needs of the application is the same; this approach is illustrated in
Exemplary method 2000 begins by determining the requirements of the lighting application (see reference number 2001). For a bridge lighting application, some possible requirements may include the following, though are not limited to such.
1. Size and shape of the target area
2. Light levels
3. Special requirements
Knowing the requirements for the lighting application, the limiting factor(s) can be determined (see reference number 2002). As with many of the steps in methods 2000 and 3000 (see
Knowing the requirements of the application, the designer can design a composite beam (see reference number 2003). To demonstrate aspects of the present invention according to steps 2003 and 2004, a comparison to prior art lighting is warranted. Traditional roadway luminaires are suspended above the roadway (e.g., by an L-shaped pole) and project light downwardly; because light is projected downwardly the luminaire must be mounted above a certain height so a typical driver cannot directly view the light source (i.e., experience glare). However, because the present application has lanes of traffic traveling in opposite directions and requires the use of existing structural features, a traditional roadway luminaire is not appropriate for the application. As can be appreciated, if traditional roadway fixtures were used, multiple poles would likely project out of the top of existing supports 80 in various directions over roadway 20 so to provide adequate lighting, and so would not be cost-effective or structurally sound according to the limits of step 2002. As such, to illustrate aspects of the present invention, it is more appropriate to make a comparison to a sports lighting-type fixture.
Once a suitable composite beam pattern is developed and said composite pattern comprises a number of suitable individual beam patterns, each of the individual beam patterns can be assigned to the fixtures (see step 2 above) according to step 2004 of method 2000. Again, there is no one correct determination for step 2004; rather, there are more desirable determinations depending on a variety of factors. As an example at the fixture level, for aesthetic reasons it may be beneficial to assign an equal number of individual beam patterns to each fixture (e.g., to ensure each fixture contains the same number of modules) or to assign individual beam patterns according to a specific layout (e.g., to ensure each fixture is aimed at the same angle, regardless of the aiming angles of the modules within each fixture). As an example at the module level, two individual beam patterns could be assigned to two modules each with a single LED contained therein, or two individual beam patterns could be assigned to a single module with multiple LEDs contained therein.
Ultimately, the complexity of step 2004 will be determined by the extent to which fixtures may be customized. Customization can be tailored by selection of aiming angles (of fixtures, modules, and module bars, if desired), light transmitting elements (e.g., size and design of lenses 400), light blocking elements (e.g., size and design of visor 500), and light redirecting elements (e.g., size and design of reflective surface 507), for example. It is of note, however, that depending on the limiting factors determined in step 2002, step 2004 could be completed prior to step 2003 (i.e., the fixture specifics decided upon first and the resulting composite beam built and reviewed for adherence to steps 2001 and 2002 afterward).
Once each individual beam pattern has been assigned to a fixture according to preference, restrictions, or otherwise, each fixture can be properly built and aimed according to method 3000 in
1. Aiming angle of fixture housing 60
2. Color and finish of the fixture
3. Special mounting considerations
4. Number, placement, and orientation of module bars 50 within housing 60
5. Placement and aiming of module 10 within housing 60
Once a fixture's requirements are determined according to step 3001 of method 3000, the fixture housing itself may be aimed according to step 3002 (see also
Once fixture housing 60 is aimed according to step 3002 of method 3000, the first module bar/LED module assembly can be built according to step 3003 (see also
Once LED modules 10 are installed on module bar 50, each may be aimed according to step 3004 of method 3000. As previously stated, it is likely impractical to assign an individual beam pattern to each LED module; it is more likely that the composite beam will be broken down into just enough individual beams that one or more rows of LED modules (see
As can be seen from the example in Table 1, each module 10 may need to be pivoted about one or both axes illustrated in
The mechanics of aiming a module 10 have already been discussed, but to do so in a rapid and repeatable manner it is beneficial if all modules associated with an individual beam pattern are aligned to a common reference—readily visible to an assembler—while affixed to module bar 50, but prior to module bar 50 being installed in fixture housing 60. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/534,335, incorporated herein by reference (and now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,300,219) discusses methods of aiming a plurality of objects to a common reference, though other methods are possible, and envisioned. In practice, each individual module could have a laser mounted thereon and the module pivoted until the beam projected from the mounted laser matched the position of an aiming point projected onto a wall or floor. This same approach could be applied to a module bar in that the laser could be mounted to the bar and aimed to a reference point and the aiming of each LED module mounted to said module bar assumed to be accurate once the bar is aimed. The aiming of the fixture housing could be assured using the same method. Of course, a laser need not be used; a sensor/receiver setup could be used. There are a variety of methods by which LED modules 10 may be precisely aimed and though it is perhaps the easiest to aim LED modules 10 prior to installation in fixture housing 60, it is not a departure from aspects of the present invention to aim modules in situ.
Once a module bar/LED module assembly is fully built and aimed, it may be installed in fixture housing 60 according to step 3005 of method 3000. Ideally, no additional aiming or modification to the assembly is required once affixed to the interior of housing 60. The process is repeated according to step 3006 for all modules in a given fixture, after which outer components (see
C. LED Lighting System
The precise contents of enclosures 110A and 110B will vary depending on the needs of the application. For example, it is beneficial for controller 112 to be able to dim the lights and turn the lights on and off in response to some command. Said command could be facilitated on site (e.g., by the aforementioned main disconnect switch) or received from a remote location (e.g., received from a control center such as that described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,778,635 incorporated herein by reference). If the latter is desirable, then the means of networking multiple fixtures 5000 on multiple poles must be considered. A wired network could utilize powerline communications to connect each pole location and place the entire system in communication with a remotely located control center. Alternatively, if a wireless network (e.g., based on a ZigBee platform) is desirable, then controller 112 could include functionality to operate accordingly; an example of wireless control of an LED lighting system is discussed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/604,572 incorporated herein by reference and now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,734,163. Though it is beneficial if the plurality of fixtures 5000 in the exemplary lighting system are connected via a wireless mesh network and controllers 112 therein capable of both communicating with a remotely located control center and executing method 4000 (see
An exemplary design of armature is illustrated in
As envisioned, each pole 81 includes one or more posts 83 (see
Another important feature of armature 600 is that it provides a continuous grounding path so that, particularly in outdoor applications, a charge (e.g., from a lightning strike) can be dissipated into the earth; this is ensured by grounding springs 616, 624, and 634. Of course, this assumes fixture 5000, armature 600, and pole 81 are all electrically conductive, though this is not a limitation of the invention.
To facilitate aiming of fixture 5000 relative to pole 81, fixture 5000 may be pivoted about an axis extending along the length of bolt 633. As discussed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/910,443, when a desired orientation is achieved, bolt 633 and associated washers and nut 627 may be tightened so to direct the load through friction rings 632. Likewise, fixture 5000 may be pivoted about a second axis extending along the axis of ribbed neck bolts 86. As discussed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/333,996, when a desired orientation is achieved, bolts 86 and associated nuts 618 may be tightened.
D. Operating Long-Term
As previously stated, for large-scale outdoor lighting systems, such as that illustrated in
A manufacturer will typically supply a variety of data for an LED; of primary interest is predicted end-of-life (EOL) data per the aforementioned LM-80 standard (also referred to as L70 data as EOL has been determined by IESNA to be the point when light output is 70% of initial), power consumption data (e.g., wattage per LED based on incoming current), and thermal resistance data. A first step (see reference number 4001) is to thermally characterize the fixture so to understand how the combination of a particular fixture and LED will affect the lifespan of the LED; in essence, to determine how effective a particular fixture design is as a heat sink for a particular LED. In practice, a software package (e.g., Qfin 4.0 available from Qfinsoft Technology, Inc., Rossland, British Columbia, Canada) is used to analyze the thermal characteristics of fixture 5000, the results are taken in combination with the power consumption data provided for the XP-G Cree LEDs used in fixture 5000, and a relationship is developed between forward current (If), LED power (WL), fixture power (Wf), and LED case temperature (Ta). Knowing this relationship, and knowing the thermal resistance data for the LED, a formula relating LED junction temperature (Tj) to If and a formula relating Ta to If can be developed.
The next step (see reference number 4002) is to photometrically characterize the light source so to understand how light output for a particular LED is impacted by current and temperature. In practice, the XP-G Cree LED is tested under a variety of conditions so to develop an array which correlates a combination of Tj and If to a luminous flux (Φ); standard photometric testing procedures are well known in the art (see, for example, IESNA standard LM-79) and so are not further discussed in this text.
Having the information from steps 4001 and 4002 is necessary to aid in determining the limiting factor(s) per step 4003 of method 4000. Similar to step 2002 of method 2000, determining the limiting factor(s) requires some knowledge of the application. For example, knowing the lighting requirements of the application determines, at least in part, what model of LED is used and in what quantity. Knowing the model of LED, the quantity of LEDs, and any other application-specific power requirements (e.g., requirements to be UL listed) determines, at least in part, the model and quantity of LED driver. Finally, knowing the capacity of each LED driver and the capacity of each LED determines, at least in part, a maximum forward current (IFM) for each LED. IFM is defined as the desired current of each XP-G Cree LED in fixture 5000 at the end of the predefined operating period (which could vary depending on the application). However, an important aspect of the present invention is one which is somewhat counterintuitive; the model and quantity of LED driver must also be selected such that each XP-G Cree LED in fixture 5000 could exceed IFM, if necessary; this permits significant flexibility in correcting for adverse operating conditions, some of which have already been discussed.
Generally speaking, it is desirable to closely match the driver for the intended load in terms of wattage, current, and the like. If a driver and load is mismatched, the driver is less efficient; this concept is well known in the art. It is counterintuitive, then, to purposefully mismatch the driver and load in present invention; however, it allows method 4000 (and the present invention as a whole) the flexibility to reasonably ensure the predefined number of operating hours can be reached. In this manner, the LED system as a whole costs more than a traditional system would, but less than what it would cost to replace all the drivers near EOL if it becomes apparent the system will reach EOL prematurely. In practice, the driver selected is one that is (i) dimmable, (ii) capable of running the LEDs at IFM, (iii) capable of running the LEDs above IFM, and (iv) capable of running the LEDs well below IfM (IL), where IL is no less than 50% of the current described in (iii) above (e.g., to limit driver inefficiency). It is beneficial if the selected driver is capable of linear dimming (i.e., dimming at 100% duty cycle) as it is known that driver efficiency suffers when dimming is effectuated by reducing the duty cycle, though this is not a limitation of the invention.
Knowing IL one can determine the corresponding light output (ΦL) based on the matrix developed in step 4002; again, this is specific to the make and model of LED. Using ΦL as a lower light output threshold, an upper light level threshold (ΦH) can be determined taking into account a defined light depreciation before compensation is made. Ideally, light output is constant; there is little benefit to ensuring the longevity of an LED lighting system if the light output is permitted to degrade to the point that the light is inadequate for the application. That being said, it is impractical to maintain truly constant light; though, the human eye is not adapted to perceive small changes in light levels so a relatively constant light output is permissible. In practice, ΦH is calculated using a 2% light depreciation, though this is not a limitation of the invention.
Once all the limiting factors are identified, the compensation method to ensure longevity and relatively constant light in an LED lighting system can be executed (see step 4004). Conceptually, the LED lighting system is operated such that each LED sees the same current and the system produces an overall initial light output. Over time, the light output will decrease. When light output has decreased a particular amount, compensation will be made by increasing current to the LEDs by a particular amount for a particular length of time. When the particular length of time is reached, another compensation of a particular amount of current will be made for another particular length of time, and so on until the cumulative operating time of the system reaches the predefined number of operating hours.
Referring back to method 4000, and using ΦH and IFM as constraints, the formulas developed in step 4001 can be solved for If and Tj. If and Tj can be substituted back into the Ta equation developed in step 4001 and the Ta equation plotted against the L70 data provided by the manufacturer for the specific make and model of LED (in this example, model XP-G available from Cree) using the ENERGY STAR exponential equation established by the U.S. Department of Energy/Environmental Protection Agency to fill in gaps in data, though other methods of extrapolation could be used. The plotted equation, in essence, produces a new L70 curve for the specific LED case temperature (Ta)—where the x-axis is If and the y-axis is hours. At this point, using methods well known in the art, one can analyze the new L70 curve to determine the length of time until light output is at 98% (i.e., a 2% depreciation rate). Thus, the current provided to each XP-G LED in fixture 5000 is set at the calculated If for the length of time determined from the new L70 curve. Once the defined length of time has passed, the process (beginning with using ΦH and IFM as constraints) begins again. Step 4004 repeats until the sum of each time frame equals or exceeds the predefined number of operating hours (or some other desired condition occurs).
As designed, the compensation per step 4004 is made relative to the stage (i.e., light depreciates 2% relative to what the light output was at the beginning of the extrapolated timeframe); however, this is but one way to practice the invention. For example, method 4000 could be adapted so light depreciation is measured relative to the initial light output of the system. As another example, instead of a percentage, ΦH could be developed based on a specific number of lumens.
As envisioned, method 4000 is adapted to—for a particular combination of fixture and light source—reasonably ensure the longevity of the light source while providing relatively constant light. It can be appreciated that different types of light sources (e.g., low-wattage metal halide lamps) and different configurations of fixtures could be used and not depart from aspects of the present invention. Further, method 4000 was developed so to reasonably ensure longevity and relatively constant light for particularly challenging lighting applications where it is not practical to perform periodic maintenance or maintain a physical presence on site; however, this is by way of example and not by way of limitation. For example, it is possible that method 4000 could be updated based on actual light or temperature measurements; these could be made by a photocell or thermocouple installed inside fixture 5000 and in communication with controller 112, or by personnel on site (e.g., with a light meter and a laptop or other device capable of imparting instructions to controller 112), or even by personnel on site making light measurements, communicating said measurements to the remotely located control center, and the control center communicating changes to controller 112.
The invention may take many forms and embodiments. The foregoing examples are but a few of those. To give some sense of some options and alternatives, a few examples are given below.
A variety of methods and apparatuses have been described herein, as well as a variety of alternatives. It is of note that none of these are intended to be limiting. For example, instead of LEDs, lower wattage traditional light sources (e.g., metal halide lamps) could be used. As another example, the lighting application may comprise a sports field instead of a bridge or roadway. As yet another example, bolts and threaded blind holes could be replaced with a clamping-type mechanism. Likewise, a number of connective devices described herein (e.g., bolts, screws, etc.) could be replaced with some other form of connection (e.g., welding, gluing).
As another example, the design of fixture 5000 could differ from that illustrated. Instead of module bars 50 bolted into a housing 60 with a stepped cross-section, a plate 50A could be seated in a substantially solid housing; an example of this is illustrated in
As another example, some number of modules 10 in fixture 5000 could be installed in opposite fashion to other modules (e.g., so that the top view in
This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §119 to provisional U.S. Application Ser. No. 61/446,915, filed Feb. 25, 2011 which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3483428 | La Plante | Dec 1969 | A |
4107770 | Weber | Aug 1978 | A |
4135116 | Smith | Jan 1979 | A |
4319311 | Mitchell | Mar 1982 | A |
4450507 | Gordin | May 1984 | A |
4475065 | Bhalla et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4701669 | Head et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
5092552 | Dayton et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5207747 | Gordin | May 1993 | A |
5253336 | Yamada | Oct 1993 | A |
5259091 | Mordick | Nov 1993 | A |
5313379 | Lemons | May 1994 | A |
5584574 | Haddad | Dec 1996 | A |
5783909 | Hochstein | Jul 1998 | A |
6078148 | Hochstein | Jun 2000 | A |
6082878 | Doubek et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6236331 | Dussureault | May 2001 | B1 |
6250774 | Begemann | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6292497 | Nakano | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6456016 | Sundahl et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6543911 | Rizkin et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6580182 | Janning | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6648495 | Hsu | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6733159 | Wu | May 2004 | B1 |
6734957 | Schmidt et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6836082 | Buij | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6923551 | Galli | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6942363 | LeVasseur | Sep 2005 | B1 |
7012604 | Christie et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7176635 | Gordin et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7319298 | Jungwirth et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7325938 | Yoshida et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7327097 | Chang et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7385360 | Dluzniak | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7425798 | St.-Germain | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7458700 | Gordin | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7495817 | Hunt | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7504783 | Zarr | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7518321 | Chang et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7521872 | Bruning | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7540629 | Steinberg | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7543941 | Holder et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7618163 | Wilcox | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7618171 | Tessnow et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7625102 | Koike et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7654686 | Oza | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7654705 | Czech et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7675251 | Gordin et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7731402 | Tessnow et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7734356 | Cleland et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7736014 | Blomberg | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7766509 | Laporte | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7778635 | Crookham et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7845824 | Robotham | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7857497 | Koike et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7863829 | Sayers et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7874055 | Stone | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7918591 | Lynch | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7952262 | Wilcox et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7972035 | Boyer | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8002425 | Russo et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8002435 | Laporte | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8018457 | Peterson et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8021013 | Russo et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8066406 | Boyer et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8101434 | Guillien et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8256916 | Richmond | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8256921 | Crookham | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8342709 | Lueken | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8342714 | Rea | Jan 2013 | B1 |
8390211 | Green | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8622569 | Crookham | Jan 2014 | B1 |
8789967 | Gordin | Jul 2014 | B2 |
20020198978 | Watkins | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20050068765 | Ertze Encinas | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20060176708 | Gordin et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20080062689 | Villard | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080296589 | Speier et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090066258 | Cleland et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090206775 | Green et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100020551 | Kay et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100045191 | Aendekerk | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100096993 | Ashdown | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100157570 | Xiao et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100165643 | Russo et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100328931 | Fogerlie | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110057570 | Cleland et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110074313 | Gordin | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110149582 | McKee | Jun 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2004237249 | Nov 2004 | AU |
0669788 | May 2000 | EP |
09180886 | Jul 1997 | JP |
2005059436 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO 2008037118 | Apr 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Musco Corporation et al., PCT/US2012/025599 filed Feb. 17, 2012, “Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration” mailed Dec. 3, 2012. |
Benthin, Carsten, et al., “Interactive Headlight Simulation—A Case Study of Interactive Distributed Ray Tracing”, Computer Graphics Group, Saarland University, Technical Report TR-2002-03, Copyright 2002 (6 pages). |
Cree, Application Note—“Pulsed Over-Current Driving of XLamp LEDs: Information and Cautions”, CLD-AP60 Rev 0, Copyright 2010-2011 (10 pages). |
Derwent, Brochure—“AEGIS Intelligent-IR”, Copyright 2007-2008, Derwent Systems Ltd. (20 pages). |
Illuminating Engineering Society, IES LM-79-08, “Electrical and Photometric Measurements of Solid-State Lighting Products”, Copy right 2008 (22 pages). |
Illuminating Engineering Society, IES LM-80-08, “Measuring Lumen Maintenance of LED Light Sources”, Copyright 2008 (10 pages). |
Lumec, A Lumec White Paper—“LEDs for Outdoor Lighting Applications” (date unknown) (11 pages). |
Philips-Lumec, Brochure—“LEONIS—Landmark of a New Word” (date unknown) (24 pages). |
Philips-Lumec, Brochure—“LifeLED / Breathing Life”, Copyright 2008 (20 pages). |
Poor, Robert, “Wireless Mesh Networks”, http://www.sensorsmag.com/sensors/content/printContentPopup.jsp?id=334971, accessed Jan. 2008 (7 pages). |
Sample pages from Philips Lighting Company, “Lighting Handbook: Chapter 13—Roadway and Tunnel Lighting”, pp. 13-1-13-16, Copyright 1984 (16 pages). |
Stich, Andreas, et al., Application Note—“Osram Ostar Headlamp—Details on Handling, Mounting and Electrical Connection”, Mar. 2010 (10 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/534,335, Myron Gordin, et al., filed Aug. 3, 2009 (not published) (95 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/604,572, Myron Gordin, et al., filed Oct. 23, 2009 (not published) (40 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120217897 A1 | Aug 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61446915 | Feb 2011 | US |