The present invention relates generally to antennas and more particularly to antennas for use in wireless communication devices.
The following publications are believed to represent the current state of the art:
U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,843,390 and 7,825,863.
The present invention seeks to provide a novel compact broadband antenna, for use wireless communication devices.
There is thus provided in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention an antenna including a substrate formed of a non-conductive material, a ground plane disposed on the substrate, a wideband radiating element having one end connected to an edge of the ground plane and an elongate feed arm feeding the wideband radiating element and having a maximum width of 1/100 of a predetermined wavelength, the predetermined wavelength being defined by
wherein λp is the predetermined wavelength, f is a lowest operating frequency of the wideband radiating element, μ is a permeability of the substrate, εr is a relative bulk permittivity of the substrate, W is a width of a conductive trace disposed above the substrate and H is a thickness of the substrate, wherein
In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention, a feed point is located on the feed arm.
Preferably, the antenna also includes a second radiating element galvanically connected to and fed by the feed point.
Preferably, the feed arm is disposed in proximity to but offset from the wideband radiating element and the edge of the ground plane.
In accordance with another preferred embodiment of the present invention, the wideband radiating element includes a first portion and a second portion.
Preferably, the first and second portions are generally parallel to each other and to the edge of the ground plane.
Preferably, the first portion is separated from the edge of the ground plane by a distance of less than 1/80 of the predetermined wavelength.
In accordance with a further preferred embodiment of the present invention, the substrate has at least an upper surface and a lower surface.
Preferably, at least the ground plane and the wideband radiating element are located on one of the upper and lower surfaces.
Preferably, at least the feed arm is located on the other one of the upper and lower surfaces.
Alternatively, at least the ground plane, the wideband radiating element and the feed arm are located on a common surface of the substrate.
In accordance with yet another preferred embodiment of the present invention, the wideband radiating element radiates in a low-frequency band.
Preferably, the low-frequency band includes at least one of LTE 700, LTE 750, GSM 850, GSM 900 and 700-960 MHz.
Preferably, a length of the wideband radiating element is generally equal to a quarter of a wavelength corresponding to the low-frequency band.
Preferably, the second radiating element radiates in a high-frequency band.
Preferably, a frequency of radiation of the wideband radiating element exhibits negligible dependency upon a frequency of radiation of the second radiating element.
The present invention will be understood and appreciated more fully from the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the drawings in which:
Reference is now made to
As seen in
As seen most clearly in
Radiating element 104 is fed by an elongate feed arm 114, which feed arm 114 is preferably disposed in proximity to but offset from both the first portion 110 of radiating element 104 and from the edge 108 of the ground plane 102. As seen most clearly in section A-A of
As best seen at section A-A of
Due to its narrow elongate structure; feed arm 114 has a high series inductance. Furthermore, the close proximity of feed arm 114 to the edge 108 of ground plane 102 confers a significant shunt capacitance on the ground plane 102. The compensatory interaction of these two reactances, namely the series inductance and shunt capacitance, leads to improved impedance matching between radiating element 104 and feed point 116. This improved impedance matching allows radiating element 104 to operate as a wideband radiating element, capable of radiating efficiently over a broad range of frequencies despite its compact folded structure. The mechanism via which the elongate narrow feed arm 114 contributes to the wideband operation of radiating element 104 will be further detailed henceforth.
Antenna 100 is preferably supported by a non-conductive substrate 118. Substrate 118 is preferably a printed circuit board (PCB) substrate and may be formed of any suitable non-conductive material, including, by way of example, FR-4.
As seen most clearly in sections A-A and B-B of
In operation of antenna 100, feed arm 114 receives an RF input signal by way of feed point 116. Consequently, near field coupling occurs between feed arm 114, the adjacent edge 108 of ground plane 102 and the adjacent first portion 110 of the radiating element 104. This near field coupling is both capacitive and inductive in its nature, its inductive component arising due to the narrow elongate structure of feed arm 114. The near field inductive and capacitive coupling controls the impedance match of radiating element 104 to feed point 116.
In effect, feed arm 114, the edge 108 of ground plane 102 and the lower portion 110 of radiating element 104 function in combination as a loosely coupled transmission line terminated in a short circuit by end 106, which loosely coupled transmission line feeds the upper portion 112 of the radiating element 104. The loosely coupled nature of the transmission line is attributable to the feed arm 114 being disposed in proximity to but offset from the radiating element 104 and ground plane 102. The loosely coupled nature of the transmission line is further enhanced by the gap between the lower portion 110 of radiating element 104 and the edge 108 of the ground plane, which gap is preferably conductor-free, save for the connection of the lower portion 110 at end 106 to the edge 108.
The loosely coupled transmission line thus formed acts as a distributed matching circuit, leading to improved impedance matching over the frequency band of radiation of radiating element 104 and hence endowing radiating element 104 with wideband performance.
It is appreciated that the improved impedance matching between radiating element 104 and feed point 116 is due in large part to the compensatory interaction of the significant series inductive coupling component arising from the narrow elongate structure of the feed arm 114 and the shunt capacitive coupling component arising from the close proximity of feed arm 114 to the ground plane edge 108. In the absence of the series inductive coupling component, near field capacitive coupling alone would provide a poorer impedance match and hence narrower bandwidth of performance of radiating element 104.
Feed arm 114 preferably has a maximum width of 1/100 of a predetermined wavelength λp, which predetermined wavelength λp is preferably defined by:
wherein f is a lowest operating frequency of radiating element 104, μ is the permeability of substrate 118, εr is the relative bulk permittivity of substrate 118, W is the width of a conductive trace disposed above substrate 118, forming a microstrip transmission line bounded by air, and H is the thickness of substrate 118. The expression
corresponds to the effective dielectric constant for the substrate system. This definition of λp assumes that
and is based upon equations derived by I. J. Bahl and D. K. Trivedi in “A Designer's Guide to Microstrip Line”, Microwaves, May 1977, pp. 174-182.
It is appreciated that the conductive trace referenced in the above equation is simply an entity of computational convenience, used in order to define the substrate-specific wavelength corresponding the lowest operating frequency of radiating element 104 and hence the preferable maximum width of feed arm 114. It is understood that such a conductive trace is not necessarily actually formed in a preferred embodiment of substrate 118.
Wideband radiating element 104 preferably operates as a low-band radiating element, preferably capable of radiating in at least one of the LTE 700, LTE 750, GSM 850, GSM 900 and 700-960 MHz frequency bands. Thus, by way of example, when wideband radiating element 104 operates at a lowest frequency of 700 MHz, the predetermined wavelength λp corresponding to 700 MHz and defined with respect to a 50 Ohm microstrip transmission line formed of a 1 mm thick FR-4 PCB substrate 118 is approximately 230 mm. The maximum width of feed arm 114 according to this exemplary embodiment is approximately 2.3 mm.
Radiating element 104 preferably has a total physical length approximately equal to a quarter of its operating wavelength. It is appreciated that the first portion 110 of radiating element 104 thus has a dual function, in that it both contributes to the near field coupling between the feed arm 114 and the radiating element 104, as described above, and constitutes a portion of the total length of radiating element 104. A second end 124 of radiating element 104, distal from its first end 106 connected to ground plane 102, is preferably bent in a direction towards edge 108 of ground plane 102, whereby radiating element 104 is arranged in a compact fashion.
Antenna 100 operates optimally when radiating element 104 is located in close proximity to the edge 108 of ground plane 102, due to the contribution of the edge 108 of the ground plane 102 to the above-described effective matching circuit. Particularly preferably, first portion 110 of radiating element 104 is separated from the edge 108 of the ground plane 102 by a distance of less than 1/80 of the above-defined predetermined wavelength λp. Thus, by way of example, when wideband radiating element 104 operates at a lowest frequency of 700 MHz, the predetermined wavelength λp corresponding to 700 MHz and defined with respect to a 50 Ohm microstrip transmission line formed of a 1 mm thick FR-4 PCB substrate 118 is approximately 230 mm. The separation of first portion 110 of radiating element 104 from the edge 108 of the ground plane, according to this exemplary embodiment, is less than approximately 2.8 mm.
The close proximity of radiating element 104 to the ground plane 102 is a highly unusual feature of antenna 100 in comparison to conventional antennas that typically require the radiating element to be at a greater distance from the ground plane, in order to prevent degradation of the operating bandwidth and radiating efficiency of the antenna. The location of the radiating element 104 in such close proximity to the ground plane 102 in antenna 100 allows antenna 100 to be advantageously compact.
The extent of the coupling between feed arm 114, the edge 108 of the ground plane 102 and the first portion 110 of the radiating element 104 is influenced by various geometric parameters of antenna 100, including the length and width of the feed arm 114, the configuration of the first and second portions 110 and 112 of radiating element 104 and the respective separations of first portion 110 and second end 124 of radiating element 104 from the edge 108 of the ground plane 102.
Feed arm 114 and radiating element 104 may be embodied as three-dimensional conductive traces bonded to substrate 118, or as two-dimensional conductive structures printed on the surfaces 120 and 122 of substrate 118. A discrete passive component matching circuit, such as a matching circuit 126, may optionally be included within the RF feedline driving antenna 100, prior to the feed point 116.
Reference is now made to
First local minima A of the graph generally corresponds to the frequency response of antenna 100 provided by radiating element 104. As is evident from consideration of the width of region A, the response of antenna 100 is wideband and spans, by way of example, a range of 700-960 MHz with a return loss of better than −5 dB. As described above with reference to
As is evident from consideration of region B of the graph, antenna 100 does not exhibit a significant high-band response. This is because feed arm 114 does not have a significant high-frequency resonant response associated with it, due to its narrow structure and very close proximity to the ground plane 102. The poor radiating performance of feed arm 114 is an advantageous feature of antenna 100, since it allows the addition of a separate high-band radiating element, capable of operating with negligible dependence on low-band radiating element 104, as will be detailed below with reference to
Reference is now made to
As seen in
Antenna 300 is preferably supported by a non-conductive substrate 318 having respective upper and lower surfaces 320 and 322, on which upper surface 320 ground plane 302 and radiating element 304 are preferably located and on which lower surface 322 feed arm 314 is preferably located.
Feed arm 314 preferably has a maximum width of 1/100 of a predetermined wavelength λp, which predetermined wavelength λp is preferably defined by:
wherein f is a lowest operating frequency of radiating element 304, μ is the permeability of substrate 318, εr is the relative bulk permittivity of substrate 318, W is the width of a conductive trace disposed above the substrate 318, forming a microstrip transmission line bounded by air, and H is the thickness of substrate 318. The expression
corresponds to the effective dielectric constant for the substrate system. This definition of λp assumes that
and is based upon equations derived by I. J. Bahl and D. K. Trivedi in “A Designer's Guide to Microstrip Line”, Microwaves, May 1977, pp. 174-182.
First portion 310 of radiating element 304 is preferably separated from the edge 308 of the ground plane 302 by a distance of less than 1/80 the above-defined predetermined wavelength λp.
It is appreciated that antenna 300 may resemble antenna 100 in every relevant respect, with the exception of the inclusion of a second radiating element 330 in antenna 300. Second radiating element 330 shares feed point 316 with feed arm 314 and is preferably galvanically connected to feed point 316, as seen most clearly in
As seen most clearly in
In operation of antenna 300, first radiating element 304 preferably operates as a wideband low-frequency radiating element, generally in accordance with the mechanism described above in reference to low-frequency wideband radiating element 104 of antenna 100. Additionally, second radiating element 330 preferably operates as a high-frequency radiating element fed by feed point 316. Antenna 300 thus operates as a multiband antenna, capable of radiating in low- and high-frequency bands, respectively provided by first and second radiating elements 304 and 330.
It is a particular feature of a preferred embodiment of the present invention that respective first and second radiating elements 304 and 330 operate with an exceptionally low degree of mutual interdependence, despite being fed by way of a common feed point 316. The low and high operating frequencies of antenna 300 thus may be adjusted freely, due to the almost complete absence of the strong low-band and high-band tuning interdependencies exhibited by conventional multi-band antennas.
As described above with reference to
Second high-band radiating element 330 may have an inverted L-shaped configuration, as seen most clearly in
Other features and advantages of antenna 300, including its wideband response due to the improved impedance matching provided by elongate narrow feed arm 314, are generally as described above in reference to antenna 100.
Reference is now made to
First local minima A of the graph generally corresponds to the wideband low-frequency band of radiation provided by first radiating element 304 and second local minima B generally corresponds to the high-frequency band of radiation preferably provided by second radiating element 330.
As is evident from comparison of region A of
As shown in
It will be appreciated by persons skilled in the art that the present invention is not limited by what has been particularly claimed hereinbelow. Rather, the scope of the invention includes various combinations and subcombinations of the features described hereinabove as well as modifications and variations thereof as would occur to persons skilled in the art upon reading the forgoing description with reference to the drawings and which are not in the prior art. In particular, it will be appreciated that although embodiments including only single ones of the antennas of the present invention have been described herein, the inclusion of multiple ones of the antennas of the present invention on a single antenna substrate is also possible.
Reference is hereby made to U.S. Provisional Patent Application 61/429,240 entitled SLIT-FEED MULTIBAND ANTENNA, filed Jan. 3, 2011, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference and priority of which is hereby claimed pursuant to 37 CFR 1.78(a)(4) and (5)(i).
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/IL12/00001 | 1/3/2012 | WO | 00 | 8/8/2013 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61429240 | Jan 2011 | US |