The present invention relates to a compact Chien based decoding apparatus and method.
The term “Chien search” is used herein to refer to any typically iterative method or apparatus for determining roots of polynomials defined over a finite field. The term is also used herein to refer to any method or apparatus used for finding the roots of error-locator polynomials encountered in decoding, e.g., Reed-Solomon codes and BCH codes in various applications including but not limited to flash memory and other data storage applications, and data communications applications.
The error locator polynomial (denoted Λ) has the following format:
Λ(x)=Λ0+Λ1*x+Λ2*x2+ . . . +Λt*xt (Equation 1)
The Chien search includes evaluating the error locator polynomial for multiple elements of a Galois field GF(2m) over which the error locator polynomial is defined. The elements are powers of the primitive element in the field, alpha (α).
Accordingly, the Chien search includes evaluating the error locator polynomial for various powers of alpha, by setting powers of alphas in equation 1 the following sets of equations are obtained:
Λ(α)=Λ0+Λ1*α+Λ2*α2+ . . . +Λt*αt
Λ(α2)=Λ0+Λ1*α2+Λ2*α4+ . . . +Λt*α2t
Λ(αm)=Λ0+Λ1*αm+Λ2*α2m+ . . . +Λt*αmt
The different powers of α are all elements in a finite field (such as a Galois field) over which the error locator polynomial is defined. Any power of alpha for which the above error locator polynomial is zero, is termed a root. These roots provide an indication about the location of the error in the received or read data. In other words, if αn is a root of the error locator polynomial then if binary BCH code is being used, an error has occurred in bit n of the data being read or received. In BCH, each error is a flipped bit. In Reed-Solomon, each error is a symbol in which at least one bit is wrong.
The evaluation of the error locator polynomial can be implemented in an iterative manner by a hardware circuit 10 that is illustrated in
The evaluation of the error locator polynomial can also be evaluated in parallel by a hardware circuit 20 that is illustrated in
It is noted that elements of a Galois field GF(pn) can be represented as polynomials of degree strictly less than n over GF(p). Operations are then performed modulo R where R is an irreducible polynomial of degree n over GF(p), for instance using polynomial long division.
The constant multipliers 14(1,1) . . . 14(p,1) includes a modulo R operation (R is an irreducible polynomial of degree n over GF(p)).
Referring back to the examples set forth in
For example, an adder that adds two n-bit numbers in the Galois field is about 2-bit XOR gates. Even more gates are required to implement Galois adder 16 that adds J n-bit numbers. Another example is that constant multiplier which its constant multiplicand is 101010101010101 (15 bits) consume much more gates than a constant multiplier which its constant multiplicand is 000000000001111 (15 bits). The second constant multiplicand has less set bits (1), and the sets bits are located in the LSB (Least Significant Bit).
Yet for another example,
There is a growing need to provide a compact Chien search based decoding apparatus and method.
BCH and RS (Reed-Solomon) are among the most widely used cyclic error correcting codes. They are used in various practical fields such as storage and communication. When these coding schemes are used in mobile applications, power consumption is a major design constraint which sometimes even affects the actual viability of the applicability of the schemes to the mobile applications.
At least the decoding functionality of the above codes may typically employ a Chien search. An objective of certain embodiments of the present invention is to provide low power and low area Chien search apparatus with no impact on its performance (throughput or latency). This apparatus may be useful in a variety of applications, including, for example, mobile applications, memory applications including flash memory applications, and other suitable applications.
An apparatus according to embodiments of the present invention is provided having Chien search capabilities and including a first hardware circuit and a second hardware circuit. The first hardware circuit evaluates an error locator polynomial for a first element of a finite field over which the error locator polynomial is defined to provide a first set of intermediate results and a first Chien search result and provides the first set of intermediate results to the second hardware circuit. The second hardware circuit evaluates the error locator polynomial for a second element of the finite field to provide a second Chien search result in response to the first set of intermediate results. The first hardware circuit may be different from the second hardware circuit. For example, the first hardware circuit may be substantially larger (consume more area) than the second hardware circuit. The first and second hardware circuits can be tailored to evaluate different elements—the first element may differ from the second element.
The first hardware circuit may include a mask and add unit to sum unmasked bits representative of preliminary results obtained during an evaluation of the error locator polynomial thereby to provide the first set of intermediate results.
The first hardware circuit may include a shift and add unit to shift the first set of intermediate results by different shift factors thereby to provide shifted results and to add the shifted results to provide a first shifted sum.
The first hardware circuit may include a modulo circuit that may perform modulo operation on the first shifter sum thereby to provide the first Chien search result.
The second hardware circuit may include a squaring circuit to square the first set of intermediate results thereby to provide a second set of intermediate results.
The second hardware circuit may include a shift and add unit to shift the second set of intermediate results by different shift factors thereby to provide shifted results and to add the shifted results thereby to provide a second shifted sum.
The second hardware circuit may include a modulo circuit to perform a modulo operation on the second shifted sum thereby to provide the second Chien search result.
The apparatus according to embodiments of the present invention may include more than two hardware circuits. For example, the apparatus may include a third hardware circuit to evaluate the error locator polynomial for a third element of the finite field thereby to provide a third Chien search result in response to a second set of intermediate results generated by the second hardware circuit. It will be recognized that in some embodiments of the invention, the first hardware circuit may be different from the third hardware circuit. For example, the first hardware circuit may be substantially larger than the third hardware circuit; and wherein the third element differs from the second element and from the first element.
It will be recognized that each error locator polynomial evaluates the error locator polynomial for a different element of the finite field, an apparatus according to embodiments of the invention may include multiple hardware circuits, wherein each of the multiple hardware circuits performs a modulo operation only at a modulo circuit that provides a Chien search result. In some embodiments of the invention, each of these hardware circuits may include a mask and add unit to sum unmasked bits representative of preliminary results obtained during an evaluation of the error location polynomial.
The apparatus according to embodiments of the invention may include a recovery circuit to recover errors in response to Chien search results.
The apparatus according to embodiments of the invention may include a flash memory that stores data encoded in accordance with a Reed-Solomon decoding algorithm and wherein the stored data is Reed-Solomon decoded by a decoder that comprises at least the first and second hardware circuits.
The apparatus according to embodiments of the invention may include a flash memory to store data encoded in accordance with a BCH encoding algorithm and a BCH decoder.
A method according to embodiments of the present invention for Chien search is provided. According to some embodiments of the invention, the method may include evaluating, by a first hardware circuit an error locator polynomial for a first element of a finite field over which the error locator polynomial is defined to provide a first set of intermediate results and a first Chien search result; providing the first set of intermediate results to a second hardware circuit; and evaluating, by the second hardware circuit, the error locator polynomial for a second element of the finite field to provide a second Chien search result in response to the first set of intermediate results, wherein the first hardware circuit may be substantially larger than the second hardware circuit and wherein the first element differs from the second element.
The method according to embodiments of the invention may include masking bits representative of preliminary results obtained during an evaluation of the error location polynomial; and summing unmasked bits representative of the preliminary results to provide the first set of intermediate results.
The method according to embodiments of the invention may include shifting the first set of intermediate results by different shift factors to provide shifted results; and adding the shifted results to provide a first shifted sum.
The method according to embodiments of the invention may include performing a modulo operation on the first shifted sum to provide the first Chien search result.
The method according to embodiments of the invention may include squaring the first set of intermediate results to provide a second set of intermediate results.
The method according to embodiments of the invention may include shifting the second set of intermediate results by different shift factors to provide shifted results; and adding the shifted results to provide a second shifted sum.
The method according to embodiments of the invention may include performing a modulo operation on the second shifted sum to provide the second Chien search result.
The method according to embodiments of the invention may include evaluating, by a third hardware circuit, the error locator polynomial for a third element of the finite field to provide a third Chien search result in response to a second set of intermediate results that is generated by the second hardware circuit; wherein the first hardware circuit is substantially larger than the third hardware circuit; and wherein the third element differs from the second element and from the first element.
The method according to embodiments of the invention may include evaluating the error locator polynomial for different elements of the finite field; wherein each evaluation comprises applying a modulo operation only at a last stage of the evaluating.
The method according to embodiments of the invention may include masking bits representative of preliminary results obtained during an evaluation of the error location polynomial; and summing unmasked bits representative of the preliminary results to provide the first set of intermediate results.
The method according to embodiments of the invention may include recovering errors in response to Chien search results.
The method according to embodiments of the invention may include retrieving data stored in a flash memory and performing Reed-Solomon decoding.
The method according to embodiments of the invention may comprising retrieving data stored in a flash memory and performing BCH decoding
Certain embodiments of the present invention are illustrated in the following drawings:
In the following detailed description, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the invention. However, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that the present invention may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well-known methods, procedures, and components have not been described in detail so as not to obscure the present invention.
Reference is now made to
In
The errors may stem from various physical processes such as thermal noise, deterioration of storage medium over time and, especially after many read/write operations, inaccuracies in the transmitter or receiver hardware. Each error occurs at a particular location within the message, which is assumed to comprise a sequence of bits or of symbols. In the former case, binary BCH code is typically used for encoding and decoding, whereas in the latter case, non-binary BCH code, or RS code is used. In the first, binary, instance, n is used in the foregoing discussion to indicate a bit of the data being read or received in which an error has occurred. In the second, non-binary, instance, n is used in the foregoing discussion to indicate a symbol of the data being read or received in which an error has occurred.
The received data r(x) equals the following: r(x)=c(x)+e(x). Received data r(x) is typically received by an error correcting decoder 130, also termed herein the “receiver”. ECC decoder 130, using the redundancy that was added to the message and the known codebook, is operative to substantially reconstruct the original message m(x) and convey it to the intended target, message sink 140. According to certain embodiments of the present invention, the ECC decoder 130 includes a compact Chien searcher.
Reference is now made to
The ECC encoder 110 can be described in terms of a generation matrix G, thus the encoding process performed by ECC encoder 110 includes a matrix multiplication c=mG. As described above, c is the transmitted codeword and m is the message to be transmitted or, for data storage applications, the data to be stored. The ECC decoder 130 of
s=rHT=cHT+eHT=mGHT+eHT=0+eHT=eHT, or in short s=eHT.
ECC 130 can generate an Error Locator Polynomial (functionality 210 in
Once the error locator polynomial has been generated by functionality 210, compact Chien searcher 220 that has Error Locator Polynomial evaluation functionality evaluates the Error Locator Polynomial for all the elements of the field over which the Error Locator Polynomial is defined. The elements in the field that zero the error locator polynomial are the error locations. Computations are typically performed in the GF(qm) field which is a finite field. The evaluation of the Error Locator Polynomial includes searching the roots of the Error Locator Polynomial.
Error correction unit 230 corrects errors in response to the roots of the error locator polynomial that were found by compact Chien searcher 220.
In flash memory applications, the channel 120 generally represents the deterioration in the data stored in memory over time and due to repeated cycling, and the encoding and decoding (functionalities 110 and 130 in
Microcontroller 244 can include (or otherwise has the functionality of) compact Chien searcher 220. Compact Chien searcher 220 can be characterized by at least one of the following characteristics or a combination thereof: (i) utilizing dependencies between intermediate results generated during different evaluations of the error locator polynomial—generating sets of intermediate results by hardware circuits and utilizing these intermediate results by smaller hardware circuits; (ii) performing modulo operations at the end of the Chien Search; (iii) replacing addition and/or multiplication operation by masking operations and shifting operations.
Compact Chien searcher 220 is illustrated for a case in which p=8 (eight Chien searches are provided per cycle) t=66 and the Galois field is GF(215).
Compact Chien searcher 220 includes a set of registers 12(1)-12(t). This set of registers includes sixty six registers, each fifteen bit long, that are initially fed with the elements of the error location polynomial (ELP) output from error location polynomial calculation unit 210.
Compact Chien searcher 220 also includes eight hardware circuits 710, 720, 730, 740, 750, 760, 770 and 780—each provides one Chien search value by evaluating the error locator polynomial for a single element.
Hardware circuit 710 calculates r(1), hardware circuit 720 calculates r(2), 730 calculates r(3), 740 calculates r(4), 750 calculates r(5), 760 calculates r(6), 770 calculates r(7) and 780 calculates r(8).
Hardware circuit 710 is referred to as a first hardware circuit. It includes mask and add unit 810, shift and add unit 820 and modulo unit 830.
Hardware circuit 720 is referred to as a second hardware circuit. Each of hardware circuits 720, 740 and 780 includes squaring unit 840, shift and add unit 820 and modulo unit 830.
Hardware circuit 740 is referred to as a third hardware circuit.
Each of the hardware circuits 730, 750, 760 and 770 includes inner summing unit 850, constant multiplier unit 860, outer summation unit 870, modulo unit 830 and constant multiplier unit 880.
A set of intermediate results calculated by mask and add unit 810 of hardware circuit 710 is provided to squaring unit 840 of hardware circuit 720. A set of intermediate results calculated by squaring unit 840 of hardware circuit 720 is provided to squaring unit 840 of hardware circuit 740. A set of intermediate results calculated by squaring unit 840 of hardware circuit 740 is provided to squaring unit 840 of hardware circuit 780.
It is noted that the intermediate results calculated by mask and add unit 810 of hardware circuit 710 can be provided to hardware circuit 740 but in this case the squaring module of these hardware circuits will be required to perform more than a single squaring operation. The same applies to a provision of the set of intermediate results calculated by squaring unit 840 of hardware circuit 720 to squaring unit 840 of hardware circuit 780.
First hardware circuit 710 is bigger than second and third hardware circuits 720 and 740 as the mask and add unit 810 consumes more area than squaring unit 840.
The over all size of hardware circuits 710-780 is smaller than the size of a prior art circuit (as illustrated in
The following mathematical description illustrates how the size reduction can be achieved.
Λ(αi) or Λ(α8k+i) (where k is some non-negative integer) is denoted by r(i). The compact Chien search includes evaluating the error locator polynomial for each value of i (each power of alpha) it can be re-written as follows:
Where
and λj,m is the m'th bit of the content λi of the j'th register. αij is a constant that is calculated ahead of time.
Different hardware circuits can be designed for different elements.
Consider the case of i=1. In this case r(1)=1+Σm=014V1,mXm mod P(X); where
The calculation of r(1)—which evaluates if alpha is a root of the error locator polynomial can be divided into three stages: (i) calculation of V1,m to provide a set of intermediate results; (ii) calculating
and (iii) performing a modulo operation.
The calculation of V1,m can be performed by masking and summation operation, as λj,m is one bit long. If λj,m is zero (‘0’) αj is masked and if λj,m is set (‘1’) αj is not masked and can be added to other unmasked powers of α. Accordingly the masking does not require gate count at all, and the summation requires an adder that include XOR gates depending on the number of set bits in αj.
The calculation of V1,m can be calculated by mask and add unit 810 of
Mask and add unit 810 includes fifteen masking units and adding circuits denoted 810(1)-810(15). Each masking unit (also referred to as multiplier) receives α, α2, . . . , α15 and a set of masking bits. The m'th masking unit (810(m)) receives α, α2, . . . , α15, multiplies the i'th power of alpha (i ranges between 1 and 15) by the m'th bit of the i'th registers, and add the results of these multiplications. The multiplication by λi,m is equivalent to a masking operation.
For example, masking unit 810(1) calculates
—by multiplying the different powers of alpha by the least significant bits of different registers and then adding the unmasked bits.
Yet for another example, masking unit 810(14) calculates
—by multiplying the different powers of alpha by the most significant bits of different registers and then adding the unmasked bits.
The calculation of Vi,m*Xm can be performed by performing shift operations—and especially by performing m shifts of Vi,m. Calculating
requires a sequence of shift operations (by different shift factors) and a summation. The shift operation does not require gate count at all. The summation requires adders that include XOR gates depending on the overlapping between Vi,m*Xm.
The calculation of ΣVi,m Xm can be performed by shift and add unit 820 of
The modulo operation can be executed by any prior art modulo operation circuit. For example, a 29 bit number can be concerted by a 29 bits number by applying a modulo operation that involves performing XOR operations between constant vectors xi modulo p(x), depending on whether in the original value the bit corresponding to xi was 1 or 0.
The evaluation of the error locator polynomial for elements that equal αq where q is bigger than one and is a power of two (q=2k) can utilize intermediate results calculated by a hardware circuit that calculates the error locator polynomial for an element that equals 2k−1. In other words—a hardware circuit that calculates r(2k) can utilize intermediate results generated by another hardware circuit that calculates r(2k−1). This is also true for the case of r(f×2k) and r(f×2k−1).
This is illustrated by the following example:
Thus: V2,m=V1,m2; V4,m=V2,m2 and V8,m=V4,m2
Therefore, r(2) can be calculated by:
The intermediate results can be squared by a squaring module. Squaring modules are known in the art and are quite simple and require relatively small number of gates—for example only 7 XOR gates in GF(215) where the field is defined by the polynomial P(X)=X^15+X+1.
Second hardware circuit 720 includes squaring unit 840, shift and add unit 820 and modulo unit 830.
Squaring unit 840 includes fifteen squaring circuits 840(1)-840(15), each squares a single intermediate result provided by a corresponding masking unit and adding circuit of mask and add unit 810.
According to yet another embodiment of the invention the evaluation of an error locator polynomial for elements that differ from a power of two can be executed by a compact hardware unit that includes an inner summing unit 850, constant multiplier unit 860, outer summation unit 870, modulo unit 830 and constant multiplier 880.
This can be explained by re-writing the error locator polynomial as follows:
Inner summing unit 880 may operate by using the same technique used to calculate r(1) but being responsive to only s elements of λ. It calculates the following expression:
This configuration performs a majority of calculations with constants that have smaller number of ones (in relation to the prior art constants) and hence require less area in the implementation.
Constant multiplier unit 860 and outer summation unit 870 do not perform a modulo operation and calculate the following expression:
Modulo unit 830 performs modulo operation to provide an intermediate modulo result.
Constant multiplier 880 multiples the intermediate modulo result by a power of alpha (i) that is responsive to the index of the element for which the error locator polynomial is evaluated.
By implementing the re-written equation, a much simpler and compact constant multiplier can be used.
Hardware circuit 730 includes inner summation unit 850, constant multiplier unit 860, outer summation module 870, modulo circuit 830 and can also include a constant multiplier 880.
Inner summation unit 850 includes multiple inner summation units 850(1)-850(11). The outputs of these units is fed to multiple constant multipliers 860(1)-860(11) that multiply these outputs by a constant without performing modulo operation to provide multiple results. The multiple results are fed to outer summation circuit 870 that sums the multiple results to provide another result that is fed to modulo circuit 830. The output of module circuit can be fed to constant multiplier 880 that multiplies the output of modulo unit 830 by αr. For example, in hardware circuit 740—that calculated ELP(r=3) the constant multiplier 880 multiples the output of modulo unit 830 by α3.
Method 1100 can include stage 1110
Stage 1110 includes evaluating, by a first hardware circuit an error locator polynomial for a first element of a finite field over which the error locator polynomial is defined to provide a first set of intermediate results and a first Chien search result.
Stage 1120 includes providing the first set of intermediate results to a second hardware circuit. Stage 1120 follows the generation of the first set of intermediate results by the first hardware circuit but can be executed before stage 1110 ends by a provision of the first Chien search result.
Stage 1120 is followed by stage 1130 of evaluating, by the second hardware circuit, the error locator polynomial for a second element of the finite field to provide a second Chien search result in response to the first set of intermediate results. The first hardware circuit is substantially bigger than the second hardware circuit and wherein the first element differs from the second element.
Stage 1110 can includes either one of stages 1112, 1114, 1116 or a combination thereof.
Stage 1112 includes masking bits representative of preliminary results obtained during an evaluation of the error location polynomial and summing unmasked bits representative of the preliminary results to provide the first set of intermediate results.
Stage 1114 includes shifting the first set of intermediate results by different shift factors to provide shifted results and adding the shifted results to provide a first shifted sum.
Stage 1116 includes performing modulo operation on the first shifted sum to provide the first Chien search result.
Stage 1130 can includes either one of stages 1132, 1134, 1136 or a combination thereof.
Stage 1132 includes squaring the first set of intermediate results to provide a second set of intermediate results.
Stage 1134 includes shifting the second set of intermediate results by different shift factors to provide shifted results and adding the shifted results to provide a second shifted sum.
Stage 1136 includes performing modulo operation on the second shifted sum to provide the second Chien search result.
Method 1100 can also include stage 1150.
Stage 1150 includes providing the second set of intermediate results to a third hardware circuit. Stage 1150 follows the generation of the second set of intermediate results by the second hardware circuit but can be executed before stage 1130 ends by a provision of the second Chien search result.
Stage 1150 is followed by stage 1160 of evaluating, by a third hardware circuit, the error locator polynomial for a third element of the finite field to provide a third Chien search. The first hardware circuit is substantially bigger than the third hardware circuit and the third element differs from the second element and from the first element. Referring to the example set fourth in previous figures, a second set of intermediate results from hardware circuit 720 can be fed to hardware circuit 740.
Method 1100 can include evaluating the error locator polynomial for different elements of the finite field, wherein each evaluation comprises applying modulo operation only at a last stage of the evaluating. Referring to the example set fourth in previous figures, each hardware circuit out of 710, 720, 730, 740, 750, 760, 770 and 780 performs the modulo operation only at its last stage.
Either one of stages can be followed by stage 1180 of recovering errors in response to Chien search results.
Method 1100 can include performing the Chien Search to detect errors in encoded data stored in a flash memory, wherein the data is encoded in accordance with a Reed-Solomon.
Method 1100 can include performing the Chien Search to detect errors in encoded data stored in a flash memory; wherein the data is encoded in accordance with a BCH algorithm.
Certain operations are described herein as occurring in the microcontroller internal to a flash memory device. Such description is intended to include operations which may be performed by hardware which may be associated with the microcontroller such as peripheral hardware on a chip on which the microcontroller may reside. It is also appreciated that some or all of these operations, in any embodiment, may alternatively be performed by the external, host-flash memory device interface controller including operations which may be performed by hardware which may be associated with the interface controller such as peripheral hardware on a chip on which the interface controller may reside. Finally it is appreciated that the internal and external controllers may each physically reside on a single hardware device, or alternatively on several operatively associated hardware devices.
Certain operations are described herein as occurring in the microcontroller internal to a flash memory device. Such description is intended to include operations which may be performed by hardware which may be associated with the microcontroller such as peripheral hardware on a chip on which the microcontroller may reside. It is also appreciated that some or all of these operations, in any embodiment, may alternatively be performed by the external, host-flash memory device interface controller including operations which may be performed by hardware which may be associated with the interface controller such as peripheral hardware on a chip on which the interface controller may reside. Finally it is appreciated that the internal and external controllers may each physically reside on a single hardware device, or alternatively on several operatively associated hardware devices.
Any data described as being stored at a specific location in memory may alternatively be stored elsewhere, in conjunction with an indication of the location in memory with which the data is associated. For example, instead of storing page- or erase-sector-specific information within a specific page or erase sector, the same may be stored within the flash memory device's internal microcontroller or within a microcontroller interfacing between the flash memory device and the host, and an indication may be stored of the specific page or erase sector associated with the cells.
It is appreciated that the teachings of the present invention can, for example, be implemented by suitably modifying, or interfacing externally with, flash controlling apparatus. The flash controlling apparatus controls a flash memory array and may comprise either a controller external to the flash array or a microcontroller on board the flash array or otherwise incorporated therewithin. Examples of flash memory arrays include Samsung's K9XXG08UXM series, Hynix's HY27UK08BGFM Series, Micron's MT29F64G08TAAWP or other arrays such as but not limited to NOR or phase change memory. Examples of controllers which are external to the flash array they control include STMicroelectrocincs's ST7265x microcontroller family, STMicroelectrocincs's ST72681 microcontroller, and SMSC's USB97C242, Traspan Technologies' TS-4811, Chipsbank CBM2090/CBM1190. Examples of commercial IP software for Flash file systems are: Denali's Spectra™ NAND Flash File System, Aarsan's NAND Flash Controller IP Core and Arasan's NAND Flash File System. It is appreciated that the flash controller apparatus need not be NAND-type and can alternatively, for example, be NOR-type or phase change memory-type.
Flash controlling apparatus, whether external or internal to the controlled flash array, typically includes the following components: a Memory Management/File system, a NAND interface (or other flash memory array interface), a Host Interface (USB, SD or other), error correction circuitry (ECC) typically comprising an Encoder and matching decoder, and a control system managing all of the above.
The present invention may for example interface with or modify, as per any of the embodiments described herein, one, some or all of the above components and particularly with the ECC component.
It is appreciated that software components of the present invention including programs and data may, if desired, be implemented in ROM (read only memory) form including CD-ROMs, EPROMs and EEPROMs, or may be stored in any other suitable computer-readable medium such as but not limited to disks of various kinds, cards of various kinds and RAMs. Components described herein as software may, alternatively, be implemented wholly or partly in hardware, if desired, using conventional techniques.
Included in the scope of the present invention, inter alia, are electromagnetic signals carrying computer-readable instructions for performing any or all of the steps of any of the methods shown and described herein, in any suitable order; machine-readable instructions for performing any or all of the steps of any of the methods shown and described herein, in any suitable order; program storage devices readable by machine, tangibly embodying a program of instructions executable by the machine to perform any or all of the steps of any of the methods shown and described herein, in any suitable order; a computer program product comprising a computer useable medium having computer readable program code having embodied therein, and/or including computer readable program code for performing, any or all of the steps of any of the methods shown and described herein, in any suitable order; any technical effects brought about by any or all of the steps of any of the methods shown and described herein, when performed in any suitable order; any suitable apparatus or device or combination of such, programmed to perform, alone or in combination, any or all of the steps of any of the methods shown and described herein, in any suitable order; information storage devices or physical records, such as disks or hard drives, causing a computer or other device to be configured so as to carry out any or all of the steps of any of the methods shown and described herein, in any suitable order; a program pre-stored e.g. in memory or on an information network such as the Internet, before or after being downloaded, which embodies any or all of the steps of any of the methods shown and described herein, in any suitable order, and the method of uploading or downloading such, and a system including server/s and/or client/s for using such; and hardware which performs any or all of the steps of any of the methods shown and described herein, in any suitable order, either alone or in conjunction with software.
Features of the present invention which are described in the context of separate embodiments may also be provided in combination in a single embodiment. Conversely, features of the invention, including method steps, which are described for brevity in the context of a single embodiment or in a certain order may be provided separately or in any suitable subcombination or in a different order. “e.g.” is used herein in the sense of a specific example which is not intended to be limiting.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/166,834, filed Apr. 6, 2009, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4463375 | Macovski | Jul 1984 | A |
4584686 | Fritze | Apr 1986 | A |
4589084 | Fling et al. | May 1986 | A |
4866716 | Weng | Sep 1989 | A |
5077737 | Leger et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5297153 | Baggen et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5657332 | Auclair et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5729490 | Calligaro et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5793774 | Usui et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5926409 | Engh et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5942005 | Hassner et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5956268 | Lee | Sep 1999 | A |
5974582 | Ly | Oct 1999 | A |
5982659 | Irrinki et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6038634 | Ji et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6094465 | Stein et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6119245 | Hiratsuka | Sep 2000 | A |
6182261 | Haller et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6192497 | Yang et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6195287 | Hirano | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6199188 | Shen et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6209114 | Wolf et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6259627 | Wong | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6278633 | Wong et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6279133 | Vafai et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6301151 | Engh et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6370061 | Yachareni et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6374383 | Weng | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6504891 | Chevallier | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6532169 | Mann et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6532556 | Wong et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6553533 | Demura et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6560747 | Weng | May 2003 | B1 |
6581180 | Weng | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6637002 | Weng et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6639865 | Kwon | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6674665 | Mann et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6704902 | Shinbashi et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6751766 | Guterman et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6772274 | Estakhri | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6781910 | Smith | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6792569 | Cox et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6873543 | Smith et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6891768 | Smith et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6914809 | Hilton et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6915477 | Gollamudi et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6952365 | Gonzalez et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6961890 | Smith | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6990012 | Smith et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6996004 | Fastow et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
6999854 | Roth | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7010739 | Feng et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7012835 | Gonzalez et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7038950 | Hamilton et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7068539 | Guterman et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7079436 | Perner et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7149950 | Spencer et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7177977 | Chen et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7191379 | Adelmann et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7196946 | Chen et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7203874 | Roohparvar | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7290203 | Emma et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7292365 | Knox | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7301928 | Nakabayashi et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7441067 | Gorobets et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7447982 | Thurston | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7466575 | Shalvi et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7533328 | Alrod et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7558109 | Brandman et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7593263 | Sokolov et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7697326 | Sommer et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7706182 | Shalvi et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7804718 | Kim | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7805663 | Brandman et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7805664 | Yang et al. | Sep 2010 | B1 |
7844877 | Litsyn et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7961797 | Yang et al. | Jun 2011 | B1 |
8020073 | Emma et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8122328 | Liu et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
20010037483 | Sankaran et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010052103 | Hirofuji et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020063774 | Hillis et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020085419 | Kwon et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020154769 | Petersen et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030065876 | Lasser | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030101404 | Zhao et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030105620 | Bowen | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030140303 | Litwin et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030192007 | Miller et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040015771 | Lasser et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040030971 | Tanaka et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040153722 | Lee | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040153817 | Norman et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040181735 | Xin | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050013165 | Ban | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050018482 | Cemea et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050083735 | Chen et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050117401 | Chen et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050120265 | Pline et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050128811 | Kato et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050138533 | Le-Bars et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050144213 | Simkins et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050144368 | Chung et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050169057 | Shibata et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050172179 | Brandenberger et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050172208 | Yoon | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050213393 | Lasser | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060059406 | Micheloni et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060059409 | Lee | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060064537 | Oshima et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060101193 | Murin | May 2006 | A1 |
20060203587 | Li et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060221692 | Chen | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060248434 | Radke et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060268608 | Noguchi et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060294312 | Walmsley | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070025157 | Wan et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070063180 | Asano et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070103992 | Sakui et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070104004 | So et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070109858 | Conley et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070124652 | Litsyn et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070143561 | Gorobets | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070150694 | Chang et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070168625 | Cornwell et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070171714 | Wu et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070171730 | Ramamoorthy et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070180346 | Murin | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070223277 | Tanaka et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070226582 | Tang et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070226592 | Radke | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070228449 | Takano et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070253249 | Kang et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070253250 | Shibata et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070263439 | Cornwell et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070266291 | Toda et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070271494 | Gorobets | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080010581 | Alrod et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080028014 | Hilt et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080055989 | Lee et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080082897 | Brandman et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080092026 | Brandman et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080104309 | Cheon et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080116509 | Harari et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080126686 | Sokolov et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080127104 | Li et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080128790 | Jung | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080130341 | Shalvi et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080137413 | Kong et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080148115 | Sokolov et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080158958 | Sokolov et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080159059 | Moyer | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080162079 | Astigarraga et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080168216 | Lee | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080168320 | Cassuto et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080168335 | Mead | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080181001 | Shalvi | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080198650 | Shalvi et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080198652 | Shalvi et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080219050 | Shalvi et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080225599 | Chae | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080263262 | Sokolov et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080282106 | Shalvi et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080285351 | Shlick et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080301532 | Uchikawa et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080320371 | Hsu | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090024905 | Shalvi et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090043951 | Shalvi et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090072303 | Prall et al. | Mar 2009 | A9 |
20090091979 | Shalvi | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090103358 | Sommer et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090106485 | Anholt | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090113275 | Chen et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090125671 | Flynn et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090144600 | Perlmutter et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090150748 | Egner et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090157964 | Kasorla et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090158126 | Perlmutter et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090168524 | Golov et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090187803 | Anholt et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090199074 | Sommer | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090213653 | Perlmutter et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090213654 | Perlmutter et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090228761 | Perlmutter et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090240872 | Perlmutter et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090292976 | Kikuchi et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100005270 | Jiang | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100058146 | Weingarten et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100064096 | Weingarten et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100088557 | Weingarten et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100091535 | Sommer et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100095186 | Weingarten | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100110787 | Shalvi et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100115376 | Shalvi et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100122113 | Weingarten et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100124088 | Shalvi et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100131580 | Kanter et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100131806 | Weingarten et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100131809 | Katz | May 2010 | A1 |
20100131826 | Shalvi et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100131827 | Sokolov et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100131831 | Weingarten et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100146191 | Katz | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100146192 | Weingarten et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100149881 | Lee et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100180073 | Weingarten et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100199149 | Weingarten et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100199154 | Wu et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100211724 | Weingarten | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100211833 | Weingarten | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100211856 | Weingarten | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100251066 | Radke | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100253555 | Weingarten et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100257309 | Barsky et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100293321 | Weingarten | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110047441 | Yamaga | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110051521 | Levy et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110055461 | Steiner et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110096612 | Steiner et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110119562 | Steiner et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110153919 | Sabbag | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110161775 | Weingarten | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110214029 | Steiner et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110214039 | Steiner et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110246792 | Weingarten | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110246852 | Sabbag | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110252187 | Segal et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110252188 | Weingarten | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110271043 | Segal et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110302428 | Weingarten | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120001778 | Steiner et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120005554 | Steiner et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120005558 | Steiner et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120005560 | Steiner et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120008401 | Katz et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120008414 | Katz et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120051144 | Weingarten et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120063227 | Weingarten et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120066441 | Weingarten | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120110250 | Sabbag et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Fedorenko, S.V.; Trifonov, P.V.; , “Finding roots of polynomials over finite fields,” Communications, IEEE Transactions on , vol. 50, No. 11, pp. 1709-1711, Nov. 2002, doi: 10.1109/TCOMM.2002.805269. |
Search Report of PCT Patent Application WO 2009/118720 A3. |
Search Report of PCT Patent Application WO 2009/095902 A3. |
Search Report of PCT Patent Application WO 2009/078006 A3. |
Search Report of PCT Patent Application WO 2009/074979 A3. |
Search Report of PCT Patent Application WO 2009/074978 A3. |
Search Report of PCT Patent Application WO 2009/072105 A3. |
Search Report of PCT Patent Application WO 2009/072104 A3. |
Search Report of PCT Patent Application WO 2009/072103 A3. |
Search Report of PCT Patent Application WO 2009/072102 A3. |
Search Report of PCT Patent Application WO 2009/072101 A3. |
Search Report of PCT Patent Application WO 2009/072100 A3. |
Search Report of PCT Patent Application WO 2009/053963 A3. |
Search Report of PCT Patent Application WO 2009/053962 A3. |
Search Report of PCT Patent Application WO 2009/053961 A3. |
Search Report of PCT Patent Application WO 2009/037697 A3. |
Yani Chen, Kcshab K. Parhi, “Small Area Parallel Chien Search Architectures for Long BCH Codes”, Ieee Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration(VLSI) Systems, vol. 12, No. 5, May 2004. |
Yuejian Wu, “Low Power Decoding of BCH Codes”, Nortel Networks, Ottawa, Ont., Canada, in Circuits and systems, 2004. ISCAS '04. Proceeding of the 2004 International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, published May 23-26, 2004, vol. 2, pp. II-369-II-372 vol. 2. |
Michael Purser, “Introduction to Error Correcting Codes”, Artech House Inc., 1995. |
Ron M. Roth, “Introduction to Coding Theory”, Cambridge University Press, 2006. |
Akash Kumar, Serge! Sawitzki, “High-Throughput and Low Power Architectures for Reed Solomon Decoder”, (a.kumar at tue.nl, Eindhoven University of Technology and sergei.sawitzki at philips.com). |
Todd K.Moon, “Error Correction Coding Mathematical Methods and Algorithms”, A John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2005. |
Richard E. Blahut, “Algebraic Codes for Data Transmission”, Cambridge University Press, 2003. |
David Esseni, Bruno Ricco, “Trading-Off Programming Speed and Current Absorption in Flash Memories with the Ramped-Gate Programming Technique”, Ieee Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 47, No. 4, Apr. 2000. |
Giovanni Campardo, Rino Micheloni, David Novosel, “VLSI-Design of Non-Volatile Memories”, Springer Berlin Heidelberg New York, 2005. |
John G. Proakis, “Digital Communications”, 3rd ed., New York: McGraw-Hill, 1995. |
J.M. Portal, H. Aziza, D. Nee, “EEPROM Memory: Threshold Voltage Built in Self Diagnosis”, ITC International Test Conference, Paper 2.1. |
J.M. Portal, H. Aziza, D. Nee, “EEPROM Diagnosis Based on Threshold Voltage Embedded Measurement”, Journal of Electronic Testing: Theory and Applications 21, 33-42, 2005. |
G. Tao, A Scarpa, J. Dijkstra, W. Stidl, F. Kuper, “Data retention prediction for modern floating gate nonvolatile memories”, Microelectronics Reliability 40 (2000), 1561-1566. |
T. Hirncno, N. Matsukawa, H. Hazama, K. Sakui, M. Oshikiri, K. Masuda, K. Kanda, Y. Itoh, J. Miyamoto, “A New Technique for Measuring Threshold Voltage Distribution in Flash EEPROM Devices”, Proc. IEEE 1995 Int. Conference on Microelectronics Test Structures, vol. 8, Mar. 1995. |
Boaz Eitan, Guy Cohen, Assaf Shappir, Eli Lusky, Amichai Givant, Meir Janai, Ilan Bloom, Yan Polansky, Oleg Dadashev, Avi Lavan, Ran Sahar, Eduardo Maayan, “4-bit per Cell NROM Reliability”, Appears on the website of Saifun.com. |
Paulo Cappelletti, Clara Golla, Piero Olivo, Enrico Zanoni, “Flash Memories”, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1999. |
JEDEC Standard, “Stress-Test-Driven Qualification of Integrated Circuits”, JEDEC Solid State Technology Association. JEDEC Standard No. 47F pp. 1-26. |
Dempster, et al., “Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data via the EM Algorithm”, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), vol. 39, No. 1 (1997), pp. 1-38. |
Mielke, et al., “Flash EEPROM Threshold Instabilities due to Charge Trapping During Program/Erase Cycling”, IEEE Transactions on Device and Materials Reliability, vol. 4, No. 3, Sep. 2004, pp. 335-344. |
Daneshbeh, “Bit Serial Systolic Architectures for Multiplicative Inversion and Division over GF (2)”, A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2005, pp. 1-118. |
Chen, Formulas for the solutions of Quadratic Equations over GF (2), IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, vol. IT-28, No. 5, Sep. 1982, pp. 792-794. |
Berlekamp et al., “On the Solution of Algebraic Equations over Finite Fields”, Inform. Cont. 10, Oct. 1967, pp. 553-564. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100257433 A1 | Oct 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61166834 | Apr 2009 | US |