The present invention relates to an electrically energized stapler, and in particular, a compact spring energized desktop electric stapler.
Power operated staplers are known in the form of pneumatic and electrically powered devices. Such staplers are used for fastening in construction tools, and in the case of office type staplers, for binding papers. Powered office staplers are normally of the electric variety. Within the electric category common types are reduction gear driven by a motor, and impact driven through a solenoid. Gear driven types usually operate relatively slowly through cam or lever means. The slow operation allows a low peak electric current, for example through battery power or an alternate source of DC power from a line powered low voltage adaptor. An impact system through solenoid operates quickly, but requires high peak power, sometimes high enough to dim lights in an office setting. Further, the solenoid is expensive and bulky, including a large heavy copper winding. A further type of gear operated stapler uses the motor power to store energy in a spring, whereby the spring drives a staple by impact blow. However, these have required bulky structures.
In gear driven types, the amount of gear reduction required relates to the available power of the motor and the stapling energy required. A further important variable is the efficiency of the design. In some known prior designs there is substantial friction. Also in a design without spring energy storage the motor must drive through large changes in torque as the stapling cycle proceeds. As a minimum the gear reduction or motor size must allow for the peak forces of the cycle. This necessarily means the motor will operate well outside its peak efficiency loads or speeds for much of the cycle. A common such stapler may have four gear reduction stages to drive through such a cycle. A gear reduction device is also relatively slow typically requiring most of a full cycle to complete before the fastener is ejected. Further, the slow action makes such designs ill suited for use in construction tools since there is no anvil to press; the staple ejects too slowly to penetrate a wood or like surface.
In desktop use, pressing paper against or actuating a switch, or equivalent sensor, near the front of the stapler normally actuates the stapler. Commonly, the switch is to one side of the stapler. This facilitates manufacture of the device but leads to a loss of function—the actuation becomes sensitive to the angle in which papers are inserted. If the papers are angled toward the side with the switch, then the staple is installed too close to the edge of the page. If the angle is away from the switch, whereby the paper edge contacts an edge of the device opposite the switch, there may be no staple operation at all since the papers are obstructed from moving against the switch. The above-described behavior is a source of familiar unpredictability of operating electric staplers.
Some electric staplers allow for moving the position of the switch to change the location of the staple relative to the paper edge. The conventional side mounted switch is a known method to provide an adjustable switch position since it is known how to fit it beside the staple track in the various positions.
A common structure for an electric stapler includes an internal metal support frame and a separate external housing to form at least in part a double walled construction. With the support and enclosure functions separate, the overall size necessarily is large. For example, it is common that the external housing remains stationary while the internal frame moves down toward the anvil during a cycle. This requires ever more bulk to provide such movable mountings. Such a structure is complex and expensive. The very large housing is necessarily plastic to keep cost and weight reasonable. But such a large plastic structure often feels of low quality and amplifies noise.
The present invention provides improvements including size, efficiency, cost and usability to an electric stapler. In various preferred embodiments, it is of a gear motor type, with spring energy storage. The size in an exemplary 25 sheet capacity version is only slightly larger than that of a conventional manual stapler. A unitized housing provides both an external movable enclosure and a support frame for internal parts. The housing may be of either metal or plastic; if metal, such as die cast, is selected the support frame will be sturdy, the external size will be especially compact and noise transmission is minimized But plastic is a practical material also if desired. In either case the housing also normally provides the external appearance of the device.
The power train is preferably elongated with the motor at the rear, a gear set toward the center, and a low profile lever and an elongated power spring assembly at the front. The motor, gear set, lever and power spring are all preferably at a same or similar vertical level, being aligned in sequence along a length of the tool housing. Such alignment preferably includes the power spring and lever, with the power spring being largely remote from the front of the tool. One or both of the power spring and lever form a torque arm that is cantilevered from a pivot axis to the front of the tool. With the structure as described, the tool can be compact vertically along its full length and further it can be narrow in width at the front since there is minimal power spring structure at the front.
The lever engages a striker with a normal upper rest position. In this rest position, the power spring is deflected and energized. A cam roller mounted to a final gear holds down the rear of the lever until the system is activated. Upon activation the final gear rotates and the cam roller rolls off the end of the lever. The cam roller link is preferred over a non-rotating post since it will be of substantially greater efficiency without the sliding action of a post. However, a wheel is most useful when it is relatively large in diameter compared to a simple post. But with a larger diameter wheel, the wheel may release the end of the lever slowly as it rolls off the rear most corner of the lever. To reduce this effect, there may be a compliant link in the gear train to allow limited back motion between gear elements.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment unitized body, the base is pivotally attached to the body at the rear in a desktop configuration. This is consistent with a compact device that is minimally larger than a familiar desktop stapler. A base lever selectively links to a cam roller or equivalent structure to move the body downward toward the base during a cycle. There is no need for a stationary external shell although stationary elements may be included if desired.
In a preferred embodiment, the power spring is a double torsion type with arms extending forward from a common mounting. Optionally, an elongated wire or flat spring may be used. With the elongated spring, the spring structure, the lever and the power spring both extend rearward from the striker. They both remain substantially behind the striker so that the front end of the stapler can be preferably no larger than required to fit the striker, with respect to a front view.
The stapler of the present invention preferably includes an adjustable sensor switch. This sensor is activated upon contact or sense of a paper edge. The sensor is positioned at or near the center of the stapler body, with respect to a front view, just below the staple track. Being on center removes dependency on the angle of the paper. In contrast, for example, a conventional right side mounted sensor will trigger early if the paper is inserted with an angle further in on the right side. With the on center sensor, the stapling operation is closer to a user's expectations.
Along with the center mounted sensor the present invention preferably includes an adjustable sensor position along a length of the body. This allows a range of positions for a staple from the paper edge. A preferred embodiment sensor structure translates along the body and communicates with an elongated sensor bar in the body. Pressing anywhere by the sensor structure along the length of the bar actuates an electrical switch within the body. Therefore, the switch can be fixed in the body so that the connecting wires do not need to flex as in other adjustable switches. An adjusting wheel, rather than a detent slide, for example, moves the sensor for improved control of the sensor position.
In a preferred embodiment, the internal parts of the body all mount into one side. In this way there are no wires or connectors and minimal links to cross to the opposed side. This simplifies assembly and improves reliability.
The present invention is directed to a compact, spring-energized, electric stapler shown in the preferred embodiment of
Gear wheel 83, or the first gear, is stationary in the normal rest condition of
Gear 83 or other linked element should be stopped in a consistent rest orientation without over spinning to an unstable toggle position that causes unintentional firing. This unstable condition is also discussed below in the context of gear link 82. As seen in
As an operating cycle begins, gear wheel 83 turns clockwise in
Cam roller 83a is of sufficiently large diameter to usefully roll about a small axle (not shown) fitted to gear wheel 83. Alternatively, a post or sharp-edged hard rib of gear wheel 83 may be used to engage the rear of the lever 60. But using a roller provides substantially reduced friction between gear wheel 83 and lever 60. In using a relatively large cam roller, it will tend to roll off of lever end 64 slowly until the two are separated. After separation, the normal energy release and striker motion occur. But during separation there can be lost performance since lever 60 will be released slowly during the roll-off process. An analogy is a car tire rolling slowly off a curb. If the tire is reasonably large in diameter, the car can move downward slowly without damage. But in the case of a power spring, it is desirable to cause damage in the form of holes in the paper being stapled. If a small part of the lever motion is gradual, some of the potential energy in the spring is not available for impact action.
To provide a low friction roller but maintain a sudden release, there can be free play or a compliant link in the system. Then the cam rollers can “flick” away from lever end 64. For example, the cam rollers may be loosely or slidably mounted to gear wheel 83. In the preferred embodiment, the free play is in the mated gear subassembly of
Next, back in the gear train is third gear assembly 84 and 84a. Fourth gear 80 mates to motor 200 on shaft 200a. The gears are preferably made from molded plastic such as acetal or nylon. Other materials may also be used such as other plastics, ceramic, steel, die cast zinc, or machine cut bronze, or any combination thereof. In the preferred embodiment, there are three gear reduction stages for a reduction ratio of between about 100 to 120, including both outer limits and all values therebetween. In contrast, a conventional direct drive device with higher friction and large torque variations may require a ratio of over 150 to allow a practical size and motor. Using spring energy storage keeps the required motor torque relatively constant since the motor is used to deflect a spring rather than directly drive a staple. The motor can then operate near its peak efficiency through most of a cycle.
Power spring 90 includes upper loop 94 and lower arms 92. At the end of the lower arms is bent tip 91,
Spring loop 94 fits to slot 63 of lever 60,
As seen in the drawing figures, lever 60 is elongated rearward from striker 100. Lever 60 pivots about a side to side or lateral axis, preferably but not necessarily at an axis concentric with a coil of power spring 90. In
Housing 10 is compact at the front where the lever front end is adjacent to an interior ceiling of the housing in the rest condition, as seen in
In a paper fastening type stapler, as a staple is ejected, the staple exit end must be pressed toward the base as in
According to the preceding discussion, base 20 includes pivot post 22 to fit recess 12 of housing 10,
Normally there are papers (not shown) situated between the housing and base. In
To provide an upper limit stop for housing 10 moving away from base 20, rib 11 of housing 10 selectively engages rib 23 of base 20, as seen in
To remedy a jam, it can be useful to pull the base 20 open beyond its normal distance. For example, a malformed staple leg may get stuck in anvil 56, especially when stapling thick paper stacks. An optional feature of the present invention allows that the housing-base opening can be temporarily increased. Accordingly, recess 12 preferably is a slightly vertically elongated opening,
The present invention in various preferred embodiments further contemplates improvements to a paper sensing system. A preferred embodiment sensor subassembly is shown in
Adjusting slide 47 may be directly moved within housing 10 to select a stapling position. For example, a tab of slide 47 may extend externally from a side of housing 10 (not shown) to allow a user to move the slide. In the preferred embodiment, depth pointer 43 surrounds or links to slide 47 whereby moving pointer 43 causes slide 47 to move. These components are visible together in
As with slide 47, pointer 43 may be directly moved along the base by pushing at or near indicator 44 or other location. This may compromise the appearance and be difficult to control. Further, it can create asymmetric binding forces on the pointer unless the pointer is pushed from both sides. Although the above compromises do not preclude those options in the preferred embodiment, adjusting wheel 120 links to pointer 43 to allow moving the pointer. As seen in
Pointer 43 is biased lengthwise by gear 121 relatively near a centerline of the stapler. This limits twisting and binding forces on pointer 43—such forces being in rotation with respect to the view of
Normally the sensor system is biased toward the normal positions of
For control of the operating cycle, a second switch 202 (
The switches are shown as mechanical contact type. Optionally, they may be in the form of proximity type, for example, magnetic or optical. Electric socket 205 is fitted tightly within housing 10.
Most of the gears and rollers preferably rotate upon simple posts or axles (not shown). For second gear 81, axle 84b may include an offset end as seen in
Track 70 extends forward (not shown) to load staples. To extend the track release 110 is pressed forward by release button 112. Tip 114 presses the track release to rotate the track release and free the track. Release button 112 preferably includes integrated spring tabs 113 to hold the button in its normal rearward position in housing 10. Release button 112 preferably includes a relieved upper face to clear motor 200, visible in
In the disclosure there are references to housing 10. Where applicable this more generally refers to the body comprising housing halves 10 and 10a.
While particular forms of the invention have been illustrated and described, it will be apparent that various modifications can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Furthermore, it is contemplated that features of one embodiment may be combined or used in another embodiment.
This is a second application for reissue of U.S. Pat. No. 9,962,822 B2. The first reissue application was U.S. application Ser. No. 16/532,571, filed Aug. 6, 2019, which issued on Sep. 1, 2020 as U.S. RE48,186 E. U.S. Pat. No. 9,962,822 B2, issued on May 8, 2018 from U.S. application Ser. No. 15/371,162, filed Dec. 6, 2016, as a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/943,644, filed Jul. 16, 2013, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,522,463 B2, and claims priority fromto U.S. Provisional ApplicationApp. Ser. No. 61/675,648, filed Jul. 25, 2012, and from co-pending parent application Ser. No. 13/943,644, filed Jul. 16, 2013, by the same inventor, the contents of which are incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1655275 | Place | Jan 1928 | A |
1845617 | Metcalf | Feb 1932 | A |
1919373 | Krantz | Jul 1933 | A |
2087242 | Bunnell | Jul 1937 | A |
2137642 | Caranagh | Nov 1938 | A |
2326540 | Krantz | Aug 1943 | A |
2493640 | Peterson | Jan 1950 | A |
2726391 | Pilblad | Dec 1955 | A |
2755474 | Spencer | Jul 1956 | A |
2769174 | Libert | Nov 1956 | A |
2884636 | Abrams | May 1959 | A |
3103012 | Kohen et al. | Sep 1963 | A |
3276654 | Yeager et al. | Oct 1966 | A |
3278101 | Hatazaki | Oct 1966 | A |
3282489 | March | Nov 1966 | A |
3299967 | Cabot et al. | Jan 1967 | A |
3346163 | Manganaro | Oct 1967 | A |
3380640 | Singerman et al. | Apr 1968 | A |
3610505 | Males et al. | Oct 1971 | A |
3666157 | Kawai et al. | May 1972 | A |
3758016 | Olney et al. | Sep 1973 | A |
3810572 | Malkin | May 1974 | A |
3940044 | La Pointe | Feb 1976 | A |
3948426 | La Pointe | Apr 1976 | A |
4126260 | Mickelsson | Nov 1978 | A |
4367833 | Kenney | Jan 1983 | A |
4450998 | Ruskin | May 1984 | A |
4452388 | Fealey | Jun 1984 | A |
4463890 | Ruskin | Aug 1984 | A |
4530454 | Gloor et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4589581 | Balma | May 1986 | A |
4629108 | Judge | Dec 1986 | A |
4726505 | Okazaki | Feb 1988 | A |
4834278 | Lin | May 1989 | A |
5007572 | Chung-Cheng | Apr 1991 | A |
5222645 | Sueda | Jun 1993 | A |
5320270 | Crutcher | Jun 1994 | A |
5328075 | Marks | Jul 1994 | A |
5335838 | Harris et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5335839 | Fealey | Aug 1994 | A |
5356063 | Perez | Oct 1994 | A |
5407118 | Marks | Apr 1995 | A |
5413266 | Jairam | May 1995 | A |
5427296 | Chen | Jun 1995 | A |
5497932 | Brewer et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5503319 | Lai | Apr 1996 | A |
5511715 | Crutcher et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5657918 | Shimomura et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5660314 | Magnusson et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5664722 | Marks | Sep 1997 | A |
5699949 | Marks | Dec 1997 | A |
5816470 | Plato et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5988478 | Marks | Nov 1999 | A |
6068173 | Sueda | May 2000 | A |
6135337 | Harris et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6145728 | Marks | Nov 2000 | A |
6244491 | Kandasamy et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6550661 | Aoki | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6626346 | Jairam et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6634536 | Yoshie | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6789719 | Shor | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6811070 | Takada | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6820790 | Ura | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6918525 | Marks | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6966479 | Tanaka et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6997367 | Hu | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7011243 | Mochizuki | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7097086 | Joyce et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7097087 | Lammers et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7097088 | Shor | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7118019 | Marks | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7121444 | Joyce | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7124922 | Marks | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7124924 | Marks | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7140526 | Matsukawa | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7152774 | Chen | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7178709 | Marks | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7234621 | Marks | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7243832 | Jiang | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7299958 | Adams et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7311238 | Liu | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7387227 | Jiang et al. | Jun 2008 | B1 |
7389902 | Co | Jun 2008 | B1 |
7395955 | Zins et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7445139 | Okouchi | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7455206 | Huang | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7464845 | Chou | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7513406 | Marks | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7540400 | Zins et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7543728 | Spasov et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7571537 | Adams et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7681771 | Kandasamy et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7708179 | Marks | May 2010 | B2 |
7748589 | Marks | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7823759 | Jiang | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7828184 | Marks | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7950558 | Marks | May 2011 | B2 |
7984837 | Palmquist et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7992756 | Franz et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8393512 | Tanimoto et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
20040016789 | Takada | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20050199675 | Takada | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050236458 | Tsai | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060151566 | Ebihara | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060266787 | Ura | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20120181321 | Chan | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20130228607 | Marks | Sep 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
255111 | Jun 1948 | CH |
3426072 | Jan 1986 | DE |
3426072 | Jan 1986 | DE |
3638645 | May 1988 | DE |
3638645 | May 1988 | DE |
0231945 | Feb 1987 | EP |
0231945 | Feb 1987 | EP |
2229129 | Sep 1990 | GB |
2260289 | Apr 1993 | GB |
2260289 | Apr 1993 | GB |
68137570 | Aug 1983 | JP |
S58137570 | Aug 1983 | JP |
68137570 | Aug 1993 | JP |
Entry |
---|
Partial English Translation of Japanese Patent Publication 58-137570 (Year: 1983). |
PCT/US13/50995 International Search Report and the Written Opinion dated Dec. 23, 2013 (Year: 2013). |
CN 201380049671.0 First Office Action dated Dec. 1, 2015 (Year: 2015). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61675648 | Jul 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13943644 | Jul 2013 | US |
Child | 18161669 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16532571 | Aug 2019 | US |
Child | 18161669 | US | |
Parent | 15371162 | Dec 2016 | US |
Child | 18161669 | US |