Statement of the Technical Field
The inventive arrangements relate to haptic interfaces, and more particularly to compact haptic interfaces which are designed to integrate with a primary controller.
Description of the Related Art
Remote controlled unmanned vehicles are increasingly being used in a wide variety of robot applications such as explosive ordinance disposal, search and rescue operations, undersea salvage, and oil rig inspection/maintenance. As interest grows in robotic systems, providers are seeking to add haptic (force feedback) capability to their controllers. In many systems, a basic laptop-style controller already exists but these systems do not offer haptic feedback. Accordingly, there is a need for a haptic controller that can be used in connection with existing laptop-style controllers.
In many scenarios in which robots are used, conventional haptic interfaces are not well suited. These conventional haptic interfaces often have a form factor which lacks compactness and therefore do not work well. For example, conventional haptic interfaces are often designed for desktop consumer usage as opposed to mobile or portable robot operations. As such, these existing systems tend to be too large or have a form factors that makes them impractical for many applications.
Embodiments of the invention concern a compact haptic interface. The compact haptic interface includes a base and a yoke rotatably disposed within the base. A first motor is mounted stationary within the base. A first drive coupling provided between the first motor and the yoke is arranged to facilitate rotation of the yoke about a yoke axis responsive to operation of the motor. A carrier is mounted to the yoke and rotatable about a carrier axis transverse to the yoke axis. A rod is mounted to the carrier, and extends along a rod axis transverse to the yoke axis and the carrier axis. The rod terminates at a grip end spaced apart from the yoke. A second motor is supported on the yoke. A second drive coupling is arranged to facilitate rotation of the carrier about the carrier axis responsive to operation of the second motor. A third motor is supported on the carrier and rotatable with the carrier about the carrier axis of rotation. A third drive coupling is arranged to facilitate linear movement of the rod along a linear direction defined by the rod axis responsive to operation of the third motor. A grip assembly is disposed at the grip end and includes a grip which movable relative to the grip end.
Embodiments will be described with reference to the following drawing figures, in which like numerals represent like items throughout the figures, and in which:
The invention is described with reference to the attached figures. The figures are not drawn to scale and they are provided merely to illustrate the instant invention. Several aspects of the invention are described below with reference to example applications for illustration. It should be understood that numerous specific details, relationships, and methods are set forth to provide a full understanding of the invention. One having ordinary skill in the relevant art, however, will readily recognize that the invention can be practiced without one or more of the specific details or with other methods. In other instances, well-known structures or operation are not shown in detail to avoid obscuring the invention. The invention is not limited by the illustrated ordering of acts or events, as some acts may occur in different orders and/or concurrently with other acts or events. Furthermore, not all illustrated acts or events are required to implement a methodology in accordance with the invention.
A compact haptic interface as disclosed herein can be configured as a stand-alone robot control system which includes all power, communication, and processing circuitry needed for remotely controlling a robot device. However, the design of the device is optimized for use with a laptop computer in a portable or mobile environment. As such, the compact haptic interface described herein is designed to be mechanically compact and lightweight. It has a narrow footprint which allows it to fit on the side of a standard operator console as an add-on manipulation controller. Importantly, the mechanical arrangement of the system is optimized to facilitate its highest levels of haptic force output in preferred directions.
Referring now to
The compact haptic interface includes an elongated rod 110. The grip is connected to the rod 110 at a grip end 120 by means of a wrist joint 118. The wrist joint facilitates movement of the grip relative to the rod. For example, the wrist joint can facilitate rotation of grip about one or more axes of rotation. According to one aspect, the wrist joint 118 can be a ball and socket joint which facilitates rotation of the grip about three orthogonal axis.
The rod 110 functions as a joystick and is movable relative to the base 102 as hereinafter described. The movement of the rod allows the grip 104 to move within a generally arcuate range of motion defined by a workspace boundary 112 in
Referring now to
A yoke 304 is rotatably mounted with respect to the base 102, and a carrier 306 is rotatably mounted with respect to the yoke. The first motor 301 is mechanically coupled to the yoke by means of a drive coupling 312 so as to cause rotation of the yoke about a yoke axis 308. In certain embodiments of the invention as described herein, it can be advantageous to mount the first motor 301 so that its axis of rotation is aligned with the yoke axis of rotation. As best shown in
The first motor 301 and first drive coupling 312 are arranged to facilitate rotation of the yoke about the yoke axis 308 responsive to operation of the first motor. Rotation of the yoke about the yoke axis is illustrated in
A second motor 302 is mechanically coupled to the yoke 304. As such, the second motor rotates with the yoke about the yoke axis. The second motor is a rotary type motor and can be electrically powered. The second motor is securely attached to the yoke by suitable means. For example, motor brackets, screws or other types of fasteners can be used for this purpose. To provide greater clarity in the drawings, the attachment mechanism for the second motor is not shown. The second motor is operatively connected to a second drive coupling. In the exemplary arrangement shown, the second drive coupling is comprised of a drive shaft 314. The drive shaft is arranged to rotate within the yoke 304 on bearings 316a, 316b. In the arrangement shown, the drive shaft 314 is directly coupled to the second motor 302, but it should be appreciated that the invention is not limited in this regard. For example, a gear box (not shown) can be used for the purpose of communicating motor torque to the drive shaft 314. Similarly, a drive belt and pulley arrangement (not shown) could be used for this purpose.
As shown in
Referring now to
The rod 110 is disposed within the rod guide structure 330. The rod 110 is guided within the rod guide structure 330 by the support bearings 318a, 318b so that it can move or slide within the rod guide structure 330 along a linear direction shown by arrow 328. A stop 320 is provided at a base end of the rod 110 to prevent the rod from being moved or pulled out of the rod guide structure 330.
The rod axis 346 is aligned along a direction of the elongated length of the rod 110. As may be observed in
A third motor 303 is mechanically attached to the carrier 306. The third motor is thus supported on the carrier and rotatable with the carrier about the carrier axis of rotation. The third motor is a rotary type motor and can be electrically powered. The third motor is securely attached to the carrier by suitable means. For example, motor brackets, screws or other types of fasteners can be used for this purpose. Screw holes 336 can be provided on a side of the carrier 306 to facilitate the motor attachment as described herein. To provide greater clarity in the drawings, the attachment mechanism for the second motor is not shown. The third motor is operatively connected to a third drive coupling. In the exemplary arrangement shown, the third drive coupling is simply comprised of a drive shaft 340 which extends through a bore 336 disposed in the carrier 306. However, as with the other drive couplings described herein, alternative embodiments are possible. The drive shaft 340 is arranged to rotate within the bore 336 when the motor 303 is operated. A pinion gear 342 is mounted on the drive shaft 340 and is positioned to engage a rack gear 344 disposed on the rod 110. When the pinion gear is rotated by drive shaft 340, it engages the rack gear 344 to cause linear motion of the rod 110 along a direction indicated by arrows 328.
The internal mechanism 300 can further include one or more encoders or sensors to detect a position of the motors 301, 302, 303. For example,
As shown in
Haptic forces are provided in human machine interfaces based on feedback from remotely controlled robotic devices and are usually intended to simulate to the user the forces that are actually experienced by the robotic device. Sensors provided at the robot can detect forces experienced by the robot and can be used to generate haptic feedback signals. These feedback signals are used as a basis for controlling haptic motors 301, 302, 303. To create a realistic haptic environment, the first, second and third motors 301, 302, 303 produce haptic forces in the x, y and z directions.
Referring now to
It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that operation of first motor 301, will not exclusively provide displacement of a grip 104 in a z direction. Instead, some displacement of the grip will also occur in the x direction as the grip 104 rotates around the yoke axis. Also, when the carrier is rotated around the carrier axis as shown in
In conventional systems the motors used to provide haptic feedback forces in the x, y, and z direction can be all approximately the same size so as to produce approximately the same amount of force in each direction. More particularly, a haptic interface can be designed so that similar amounts of haptic force are capable of being produced at the interface grip in each of the x, y and z directions. However, empirical studies have shown that human interaction with a robot is usually such that the greatest amounts of haptic force are needed in the z direction. Haptic force are often needed in the x and y directions too, but the magnitude of such forces tend to be less as compared to those needed in directions along the z axis. These differences are generally due to the way in which people tend to approach robot grasping and manipulation tasks. Accordingly, in the compact haptic interface 100, it is advantageous to select the first motor 301, which is used to generate haptic forces in the z direction, as a larger, more powerful motor as compared to the second and third motors 302, 303. Hence, a greater magnitude of haptic force can be produced in the z direction as compared to the x or y direction.
If the first motor 301 is larger and more powerful as compared to motors 301, 302 then it is also desirable for the first motor 301 to be mounted to the base 102. Such an arrangement facilitates less rotating mass since a housing associated with the largest, most powerful motor 301, does not move when the grip 104 is moved. This approach also allows for a lighter weigh yoke 304 and carrier 306 since the weight of motors 302 and 303 is less than motor 301, and the forces exerted upon the support structures by motors 302, 303 will be less as compared to motor 301. The mechanism provides maximum haptic force in directions aligned with the x-z plane while maintaining a very narrow footprint that is well suited for use adjacent to a primary control device, such as a laptop computer.
A control system 1100 is provided within the base for monitoring, controlling and coordinating the operation of the various components of the compact haptic interface 100. Referring now to
The haptic interface controller 1102 receives position input signals from encoders which specify a position of the grip 204 as it is moved within a workspace boundary 112, 114. For example, encoders 348, 350, 352, 354, 356 can be used for this purpose since they will detect movement of the grip in response to user control inputs. A data communication interface 1106 facilitates communications between the haptic interface controller 1102 and a primary robot controller (not shown), such as a laptop computer. As such, the data communication interface 1106 can be configured to implement a wired or wireless communication session with the primary robot controller. The haptic interface controller 1102 uses inputs from the encoders to generate output control signals which are useful for controlling a robot device (not shown). These output control signals are communicated from the haptic interface controller 1102 to the data communication interface 1106. The data communication interface will communicate such robot control signals to a primary robot controller (not shown), which uses the control signals to generate motion commands. These motion commands are then communicated to the robot device over a suitable data link.
Haptic sensors in the robot device will detect forces that are applied to the robot device. The information from these haptic sensors will be communicated as haptic feedback data to the primary robot controller and then to the data communication interface 1106. The haptic feedback data will then be provided to the haptic interface controller 1102. Based on the haptic feedback data, the haptic interface controller will generate signals to motor drive circuits 1104 to control the operation of haptic feedback motors (e.g. first motor 301, second motor 302, and third motor 303). The haptic interface controller can include processing facilities to determine the appropriate operations needed from each of the motors in order to achieve a desired haptic feedback force at the grip 104.
For purposes of describing the invention, it has been assumed that the compact haptic interface 100 is not a primary robot controller but instead serves primarily as a human-machine interface with respect to such a primary robot controller. However, it should be appreciated that the invention is not limited in this regard and the functions of a primary robot controller can be integrated into the compact haptic interface 100 described herein. Primary robot controllers are well known in the art and therefore will not be described here in detail.
In the inventive arrangements illustrated in
In an exemplary embodiment shown in
All of the apparatus, methods and algorithms disclosed and claimed herein can be made and executed without undue experimentation in light of the present disclosure. While the invention has been described in terms of preferred embodiments, it will be apparent to those of skill in the art that variations may be applied to the apparatus, methods and sequence of steps of the method without departing from the concept, spirit and scope of the invention. More specifically, it will be apparent that certain components may be added to, combined with, or substituted for the components described herein while the same or similar results would be achieved. All such similar substitutes and modifications apparent to those skilled in the art are deemed to be within the spirit, scope and concept of the invention as defined.)
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3280991 | Melton | Oct 1966 | A |
3637092 | George et al. | Jan 1972 | A |
4216467 | Colston | Aug 1980 | A |
4521685 | Rebman | Jun 1985 | A |
4604016 | Joyce | Aug 1986 | A |
4655673 | Hawkes | Apr 1987 | A |
4661032 | Arai | Apr 1987 | A |
4762006 | Asakawa et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4791588 | Onda et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4795296 | Jau | Jan 1989 | A |
4837734 | Ichikawa et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4842308 | Spotts | Jun 1989 | A |
4853874 | Iwamoto et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4860215 | Seraji | Aug 1989 | A |
4862751 | Asakawa et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4893254 | Chan et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4893981 | Yoshinada et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4975856 | Vold et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
5004391 | Burdea | Apr 1991 | A |
5007300 | Siva | Apr 1991 | A |
5018922 | Yoshinada et al. | May 1991 | A |
5092645 | Okada | Mar 1992 | A |
5178032 | Zona et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5184319 | Kramer | Feb 1993 | A |
5193963 | McAffee et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5231693 | Backes et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5382885 | Salcudean et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5413454 | Movsesian | May 1995 | A |
5430643 | Seraji | Jul 1995 | A |
5451924 | Massimino et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5508596 | Olsen | Apr 1996 | A |
5565891 | Armstrong | Oct 1996 | A |
5589828 | Armstrong | Dec 1996 | A |
5619180 | Massimino et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5648897 | Johnson et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5694013 | Stewart et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5737500 | Seraji et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5792165 | Klieman et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5831408 | Jacobus et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
6028593 | Rosenberg et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6047610 | Stocco et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6084587 | Tarr et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6088017 | Tremblay et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6104158 | Jacobus et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6178775 | Higginbotham et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6184868 | Shahoian et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6191796 | Tarr | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6246390 | Rosenberg | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6271833 | Rosenberg et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6281651 | Haanpaa et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6522952 | Arai et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6535793 | Allard | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6592315 | Osborne, Jr. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6636161 | Rosenberg | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6705871 | Bevirt et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6781569 | Gregorio et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6793653 | Sanchez et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6801008 | Jacobus et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6857878 | Chosack et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
7138981 | Kim et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7158112 | Rosenberg et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7168748 | Townsend et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7208900 | Carlson et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7225404 | Zilles et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
7345672 | Jacobus et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7411576 | Massie et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7480600 | Massie et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7714895 | Pretlove et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7783384 | Kraft | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7933667 | Sjoberg et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8226072 | Murayama | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8373391 | Allen et al. | Feb 2013 | B1 |
8447440 | Phillips et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8473101 | Summer | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8950286 | Gosselin et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
20010002098 | Haanpaa et al. | May 2001 | A1 |
20010037163 | Allard | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20030169235 | Gron et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040189675 | Pretlove et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040254771 | Riener et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050087373 | Wakitani et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050252329 | Demers | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060048364 | Zhang et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060066574 | Kim et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060117258 | Yu | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060178775 | Zhang et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070013336 | Nowlin et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070050139 | Sidman | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070095582 | Stuijt et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20080009971 | Kim et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080063400 | Hudson et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080161733 | Einav et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080266254 | Robbins et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090074252 | Dariush et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090182436 | Ferrara | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090234499 | Nielsen et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100019890 | Helmer et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100023185 | Terwelp et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100041991 | Roundhill | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100070079 | Mangaser et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100084513 | Gariepy et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100092267 | Najdovski et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100100256 | Jurmain et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100168918 | Zhao et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100169815 | Zhao et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100172733 | Chalubert et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100259614 | Chen | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110015569 | Kirschenman et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110046781 | Summer | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110106339 | Phillips et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110144828 | Chengalva | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110155785 | Laurent et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110257786 | Caron L'Ecuyer et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120095619 | Pack et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120150351 | Bosscher et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120184955 | Pivotto et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120185098 | Bosscher et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120185099 | Bosscher et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120294696 | Summer et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120306741 | Gupta | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130090194 | Ferlay et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130328770 | Parham | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140031983 | Low et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0672507 | Sep 1995 | EP |
1 876 505 | Jan 2008 | EP |
2 898 824 | Sep 2007 | FR |
2 228 783 | Sep 1990 | GB |
95 30571 | Nov 1995 | WO |
03 055061 | Jul 2003 | WO |
2006 016799 | Feb 2006 | WO |
2007051000 | May 2007 | WO |
2008 135978 | Nov 2008 | WO |
2010 040215 | Apr 2010 | WO |
2010085184 | Jul 2010 | WO |
2011075093 | Jun 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Information about Related Patents and Patent Applications, see section 6 of the accompanying information Disclosure Statement Letter, which concerns Related Patents and Patent Applications. |
European Search Report mailed Mar. 14, 2012, Application Serial No. 11009319.2-2316, in the name of Harris Corporation. |
Zarrad, W., et al., “Stability and Transparency Analysis of a Haptic Feedback Controller for Medical Applications”, Proceedings of the 46th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control : New Orleans, LA, Dec. 12-14, 2007, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, USA, Dec. 1, 2007, pp. 5767-5772. |
Cheung, Y., et al., “Cooperative Control of a Multi-Arm System Using Semi-Autonomous Telemanipulations and Adaptive Impedance”, Advanced Robotis, 2009, ICAR 2009. International Conference on, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, USA, Jun. 22, 2009, pp. 1-7. |
Suzuki, A., et al., “Performance conditioning of time delayed bilaterial teleoperation system by scaling down compensation value of communication disturbance observer”, Advanced Motion Control, 2010, 11th IEEE International Conference On, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, USA, Mar. 12, 2010, pp. 524-529. |
Tzafestas, C., et al., “Adaptive impedance control in haptic teleoperation to improve transparency under time-delay”, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. The Half-Day Workshop on: Towards Autonomous Agriculture of Tomorrow, IEEE-Piscataway, NJ, USA, Piscataway, NJ, USA, May 19, 2008, pp. 212-219. |
International Search Report mailed May 23, 2012; Application Serial No. PCT/US2011/066873 in the name of Harris Corporation. |
Everett L J et al; “Automatic Singularity Avoidance Using Joint Variations in Robot Task Modification”, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, IEEE Service Center, Piscataway, NJ, US, vol. 1, No. 3, Sep. 1, 1994, pp. 13-19, XP011420425. |
Jonghoon Park et al.: “Reconstruction of Inverse Kinematic Solution Subject to Joint Kinematic Limits Using Kinematic Redundancy”, Intelligent Robots and Systems '96, IROS 96, Proceedings of the 1996 L EEE/RSJ International Conference on Osaka, Japan, Nov. 4-8, 1996, New York, NY, USA, IEEE, vol. 2, 4, Nov. 1996, pp. 425-430, XP010212433. |
Hamid Abdi et al: “Joint Velocity Redistribution for Fault Tolerant Manipulators”, Robotics Automation and Mechatronics (RAM), 2010 IEEE Conference ON, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, USA, Jun. 28, 2010, pp. 492-497, XP031710198. |
International Search Report mailed Jun. 28, 2012, Application Serial No. PCT/US2012/027475 in the name of Harris Corporation. |
Marshall, W.C., et al., “A Testbed for Design of User-Friendly, Multiple-Degree-Of-Freedom, Manual Controllers”, Scientific Honeyweller, Honeywell's Corporate. Minneapolis, US Jan. 1, 1993, pp. 78-86. |
International Search Report dated Oct. 29, 2012; Application Serial No. PCT/US2012/034207 in the name of Harris Corporation. |
International Search Report dated Jan. 15, 2013, Application Serial No. PCT/US2012/037751 in the name of Harris Corporation. |
International Search Report mailed Jan. 4, 2013, International Application Serial No. PCT/US2012/058303 in the name of Harris Corporation. |
Tas, NR, et al., “Technical Note: Design, fabrication and testing of laterally driven electrostatic motors employing walking motion and mechanical leverage”, Journal of Micromechanics & Microengineering, Institute of Physics Publishing, Bristol, GB, vol. 13, No. 1, Jan. 1, 2003. N6-N15. |
Rogers, JE., et al., “Bi-directional Gap Closing MEMS Actuator Using Timing and Control Techniquest”, IEEE Industrial Electronics, IECON 2006-32nd Annual Conference on, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ USA Nov. 1, 2006, pp. 3469-3154. |
Alqasemi R et al: “Kinematics, control and redundancy resolution of a 9-DoF wheelchair-mounted robotic arm system for ADL tasks”,Mechatronics and Its Applications, 2009. ISMA '09. 6th International Symposium on, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, USA, Mar. 23, 2009, pp. 1-7. |
Tsumaki Y et al: “Design of a compact 6-DOF haptic interface”, Robotics and Automation, 1998. Proceedings. 1998 IEEE International Conference on Leuven, Belgium May 16-20, 1998, New York, NY, USA, IEEE, US, vol. 3, May 16, 1998, pp. 2580-2585. |
Bley F et al: “Supervised navigation and manipulation for impaired wheelchair users”, Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 2004 IEEE International Conference on, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, USA, vol. 3, Oct. 10, 2004, pp. 2790-2796. |
International Search Report mailed May 2, 2013, International Application No. PCT/US2012/051314, in the name of Harris Corporation. |
Torres Rocco, A.C., “Development and testing of a new C-based algorithm to control 9-degree-of-freedom wheelchair-mounted-robotic-arm system”. Jun. 1, 2010, Univ. of So. Florida. |
Alqasemi, R., et al., “Maximizing Manipulation Capabilities for People with Disabilities Using 9-DoF Wheelchair Mounted Robotic Arm System”, 2007, IEEE. |
International Search Report mailed May 12, 2014, Applicaiton Serial No. PCT/US2013/069071, in the name of Harris Corporation. |
Tijsma, et al., “A framework of interface improvements for designing new user interfaces for the MANUS robot arm”, 2005, IEEE, 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, Jul. 28-Jul. 1, 2005, Chicago, IL, USA. |
Tijsma, H.A. et al., A Framework of Interface Improvements for Designing New User Interfaces for the MANUS Robot Arm, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE, 2005, 235-240. |
Rocco, Ana Catalina Torres, Development and testing of a new C-based algoithm to control a 9-degree-of-freedom wheelchair-mounted-robotic-arm system, University of South Florida, Jun. 1, 2010. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150185755 A1 | Jul 2015 | US |