Compact head-mounted display system

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10908426
  • Patent Number
    10,908,426
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, January 29, 2019
    5 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, February 2, 2021
    3 years ago
  • Inventors
  • Original Assignees
  • Examiners
    • Alexander; William R
    • Betancourt; Alberto J
    Agents
    • Friedman; Mark M.
Abstract
There is provided an optical system, including a light-transmitting substrate (20) having at least two major surfaces (26) and edges, all optical prism (54) having at least a first (58), a second (56) and a third (60) surface, for coupling light waves having a given field-of-view into the substrate by total internal reflection, at least one partially reflecting surface located in the substrate, the partially reflecting surface being orientated non-parallelly with respect to the major surfaces of the substrate, for coupling light waves out of the substrate, at least one of the edges (50) of the substrate is slanted at an oblique angle with respect to the major surfaces, the second surface of the prism is located adjacent to the slanted edge of the substrate, and a part of the substrate located next to the slanted edge is substantially transparent, wherein the light waves enter the prism through the first surface of the prism, traverse the prism without any reflection and enter the substrate through the slanted edge.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to substrate-guided optical devices, and particularly to devices which include a plurality of reflecting surfaces carried by a common light-transmissive substrate, also referred to as a light-guide element.


The invention can be implemented to advantage in a large number of imaging applications, such as portable DVDs, cellular phones, mobile TV receivers, video games, portable media players or any other mobile display devices.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

One application for compact optical elements concerns head-mounted displays (HMDs), wherein an optical module serves both as an imaging lens and a combiner, wherein a two-dimensional image source is imaged to infinity and reflected into the eye of an observer. The display source may originate directly from a spatial light modulator (SLM), such as a cathode ray tube (CRT), a liquid crystal display (LCD), an organic light emitting diode array (OLED), a scanning source or similar devices, or indirectly, by means of a relay lens, an optical fiber bundle, or similar devices. The display source comprises an array of elements (pixels) imaged to infinity by a collimating lens and transmitted into the eye of the viewer by means of a reflecting, or partially reflecting, surface acting as a combiner for non-see-through and see-through applications, respectively. Typically, a conventional, free-space optical module is used for these purposes. As the desired field-of-view (FOV) of the system increases, however, such a conventional optical module becomes larger, heavier and bulkier, and therefore, even for a moderate performance device, is impractical. This is a major drawback for all kinds of displays and especially in head-mounted applications, wherein the system should necessarily be as light and as compact as possible.


The strive for compactness has led to several different complex optical solutions, all of which, on the one hand, are still not sufficiently compact for most practical applications, and, on the other hand, suffer major drawbacks with respect to manufacturability. Furthermore, the eye-motion-box (EMB) of the optical viewing angles resulting from these designs is usually very small—typically less than 8 mm. Hence, the performance of the optical system is very sensitive, even for small movements of the optical system relative to the eye of a viewer, and does not allow sufficient pupil motion for comfortable reading of a text from such displays.


The teachings included in Publication Nos. WO 01/95027, WO 03/081320, WO2005/024485, WO2005/024491, WO2005/024969, WO2005/124427, WO2006/013565, WO2006/085309, WO2006/085310, WO2006/087709, WO2007/054928, WO2007/093983, WO2008/023367, WO2008/129539, WO2008/149339 and WO2013/175465, all in the name of Applicant, are herein incorporated by reference.


DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION

The present invention facilitates the exploitation of very compact light-guide optical element (LOE) for, amongst other applications, HMDs, where the LOE is supported relative to a user's head by a support structure, such as an eyeglasses frame. The invention allows relatively wide FOVs together with relatively large EMB values. The resulting optical system offers a large, high-quality image, which also accommodates large movements of the eye. The optical system disclosed by the present invention is particularly advantageous because it is substantially more compact than state-of-the art implementations and yet it can be readily incorporated even into optical systems having specialized configurations.


A broad object of the present invention is therefore to alleviate the drawbacks of prior art compact optical display devices and to provide other optical components and systems having improved performance, according to specific requirements.


In accordance with the present invention, there is provided an optical system, comprising a light-transmitting substrate having at least two major surfaces and edges; an optical prism having at least a first, a second and a third surface, for coupling light waves having a given field-of-view into the substrate by total internal reflection; at least one partially reflecting surface located in the substrate, the partially reflecting surface being orientated non-parallelly with respect to the major surfaces of said substrate, for coupling light waves out of the substrate; at least one of the edges of the substrate is slanted at an oblique angle with respect to the major surfaces; the second surface of the prism is located adjacent to the slanted edge of the substrate, and a part of the substrate located next to the slanted edge is substantially transparent, characterized in that the light waves enter the prism through the first surface of the prism, traverse the prism without any reflection and enter the substrate through the slanted edge.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The invention is described in connection with certain preferred embodiments, with reference to the following illustrative figures so that it may be more fully understood.


With specific reference to the figures in detail, it is stressed that the particulars shown are by way of example and for purposes of illustrative discussion of the preferred embodiments of the present invention only, and are presented in the cause of providing what is believed to be the most useful and readily understood description of the principles and conceptual aspects of the invention. In this regard, no attempt is made to show structural details of the invention in more detail than is necessary for a fundamental understanding of the invention. The description taken with the drawings are to serve as direction to those skilled in the art as to how the several forms of the invention may be embodied in practice.


In the drawings:



FIG. 1 illustrates a span of optical rays which are coupled into an LOE, according to the present invention;



FIG. 2 illustrates a span of optical rays which illuminates the input aperture of an LOE;



FIG. 3 illustrates a prior art side view of an exemplary coupling-in mechanism comprising a prism optically attached to one of the major surfaces of the LOE;



FIG. 4 is an another schematic diagram illustrating a side view of a prior art exemplary coupling-in mechanism comprising a prism optically attached to one of the major surfaces of the LOE;



FIG. 5 illustrates a span of optical rays illuminating the input aperture of an LOE wherein one of the edges of the LOE is slanted at an oblique angle with respect to the major surfaces;



FIG. 6 is a schematic diagram illustrating another system with a span of optical rays illuminating the input aperture of an LOE, wherein one of the edges of the LOE is slanted at an oblique angle with respect to the major surfaces;



FIG. 7 is a schematic diagram illustrating an embodiment of an optical system coupling-in input light waves from a display light source into a substrate, having an intermediate prism attached to the slanted edge of the LOE, in accordance with the present invention;



FIG. 8 illustrates another embodiment of an optical system coupling-in input light waves from a display light source into a substrate, having an intermediate prism attached to the slanted edge of the LOE, in accordance with the present invention;



FIG. 9 is a schematic diagram illustrating a device for collimating input light waves from a display light source, by utilizing a polarizing beamsplitter, in accordance with the present invention, and



FIG. 10 is a schematic diagram illustrating a device for collimating input light waves from liquid crystals on silicon (LCOS) light source, in accordance with the present invention and



FIGS. 11A and 11B are two embodiments showing a top view of eyeglasses according to the present invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

The present invention relates to substrate-guided optical devices, in particular, compact HMD optical systems. Usually, a collimated image having a finite FOV is coupled into a substrate. As illustrated in FIG. 1, the image inside an LOE or, hereinafter, a substrate 20 contains a span of plane waves having central waves 14 and marginal waves 16 and 18. The angle between a central wave 14 of the image and the normal to the plane of the major surfaces 26, 32 is αin. The FOV inside the substrate 20 is defined as 2·Δα. Consequentially, the angles between the marginal waves 16 and 18 of the image and the normal to the plane of the major surfaces are αin+Δα and αin−Δα, respectively. After several reflections off the surfaces 26, 32 of the substrate 20, the trapped waves reach an array of selectively reflecting surfaces 22, which couple the light waves out of the substrate into an eye 24 of a viewer. For simplicity, only the rays of the central waves 14 are plotted as being coupled-out from the substrate.


The object of the present invention is to find a light wave coupling-in mechanism which is different to the coupling-in mechanism of the prior art and having more compact dimensions. In FIG. 2, there is illustrated a span of rays that have to be coupled into substrate 20, with a minimal required input aperture 21. In order to avoid an image with gaps or stripes, the points on the boundary line 25, between the edge of the input aperture 21 and the lower surface 26 of the substrate 20, should be illuminated for each one of the input light waves by two different rays that enter the substrate from two different locations: one ray 30 that illuminates the boundary line 25 directly, and another ray 31, which is first reflected by the upper surface 32 of the substrate before illuminating the boundary line 25. The size of the input aperture 21 is usually determined by two marginal rays: the rightmost ray 34 of the highest angle of the FOV, and the leftmost ray 36 of the lowest angle of the FOV.


A possible embodiment for coupling the marginal rays into the substrate 20 is illustrated in FIG. 3. Here, the input light waves source 38, as well as a collimating module 40, e.g., a collimating lens, are oriented at the required off-axis angle compared to the major surfaces 26, 32 of the substrate 20. A relay prism 44 is located between the collimating module 40 and the substrate 20 and is optically cemented to the lower surface 26 of the substrate 20, such that the light rays from the display source 38 impinge on the major surface 26 at angles which are larger than the critical angle, for total internal reflection inside the substrate. As a result, all the optical light waves of the image are trapped inside the substrate by total internal reflection from the major surfaces 26 and 32. Although the optical system illustrated here is simple, it is still not the most compact coupling-in mechanism. This is an important point for optical systems which should conform to the external shape of eyeglasses, as well as to hand-held or other displays.


In order to minimize the dimensions of the collimating module 40, the aperture DT of the input surface 46 of the coupling-in prism 44 should be as small as possible. As a result, the dimensions of the coupling-in prism would also be minimized accordingly, while the coupled rays of the entire FOV will pass through the coupling-in prism 44.


As illustrated in FIG. 4, in order for the rightmost ray 34 of the highest angle of the FOV to pass through the prism 44, the aperture DL of the output surface 21 of the prism 44 must fulfil the relation

DL≥2d·tan(αin+Δα)  (1)


wherein d is the thickness of the substrate 20.


In addition, in order for the leftmost ray 36 of the lowest angle of the FOV to pass through the prism 44, the angle αsur1 between the left surface 48 of the prism 44 and the normal to the major surface 26 of the substrate 20 must fulfil the relation

αsur1≤αin−Δα  (2)


For minimizing the chromatic aberrations of the optical waves passing through the prism 44, it is advantageous to orient the input surface 46 of the coupling-in prism 44 to be substantially normal to the central wave 14 of the image. As a result, the angle αsur2 between the entrance surface 46 of the prism 44 and the normal to the major surface 26 of the substrate 20 is

αsur2=90°−αin  (3)


Taking the inequality of Eq. 2 to the limit, in order to minimize the dimensions of the prism 44 yields the following internal angles of the prism: the angle between the surfaces 46 and 21 is αin; the angle between surface 48 and 21 is 90°−αin+Δα. Consequentially, the angle between surfaces 46 and 48 is 90°−Δα, Utilizing these values yields










D
T

=



D
L


sin


(


90

°

-
Δα

)



·

sin


(


90

°

-

α
in

+
Δα

)







(
4
)







Taking the inequality of Eq. 1 to the limit and inserting it in Eq. 4 yields













D
T

=



2


d
·

tan


(


α
in

+
Δα

)





cos


(
Δα
)



·

cos


(


α
in

-
Δα

)









=


2


d
·

sin


(


α
in

+
Δα

)


·

cos


(


α
in

-
Δα

)






cos


(
Δα
)


·

cos


(


α
in

+
Δα

)











(
5
)







Although the optical system illustrated in FIGS. 3 and 4 seems to be simple, it is still not the most compact coupling-in mechanism, since it is important for such optical systems to conform to the external shape of displays such as eyeglasses or hand-held displays.



FIG. 5 illustrates an alternative embodiment of coupling light waves into the substrate through one of its edges. Here, the light waves-transmitting substrate 20 has two major parallel surfaces 26 and 32 and edges, wherein at least one edge 50 is oriented at an oblique angle with respect to the major surfaces and wherein αsur3 is the angle between the edge 50 and the normal to the major surfaces of the substrate. Usually the incoming collimated light waves are coupled directly from the air, or alternatively, the collimating module 40 (FIG. 3) can be attached to the substrate 20. As a result, it is advantageous to couple the central wave 14 normal to the slanted surface 50 for minimizing chromatic aberrations. Unfortunately, this requirement cannot be fulfilled by coupling the light directly through surface 50. Usually, even for coupled images having a moderate FOV, the angle αin (FIG. 3) between the central wave 14 of the image and the normal to the plane of the major surfaces has to fulfil the requirement αin≥50°. As a result, if the central wave 14 is indeed normal to the slanted surface 50, then the relation αsur3≤40° must be fulfilled. Consequentially, the outcome will be the fulfillment of the relations in the system αsur3in and, for a comparatively wide FOV, even αsur3<<αin+Δα.



FIG. 6 illustrates the complex situation wherein the maximal angle between the trapped rays and the major surfaces 26, 32 is larger than the angle between the input surface 50 and the major surfaces. As illustrated, the points on the boundary line 25, between the edge of input aperture 50 and the lower surface 26 of substrate 20, are illuminated only by the leftmost ray 35 of the wave that directly illuminates the boundary line 25. The other marginal ray 34, which impinges on the edge 51 of the input surface 50, is first reflected by the upper surface 32 prior to illuminating the lower surface at a different line 52 which is located at a distance Δx from the boundary line 25. As illustrated, the gap Δx is not illuminated at all by the trapped rays of the marginal wave 34. Consequentially, dark stripes will appear and the coupled-out waves and the image quality will be significantly inferior.


This situation is solved by the embodiment shown in FIG. 7. An intermediate prism 54 is inserted between the collimating module 40 (FIG. 3) and the slanted edge 50 of the substrate. One of the prism's surfaces 56 is located adjacent to the slanted edge 50 of the substrate 20. In most cases, the refractive index of the intermediate prism should be similar to that of the substrate 20. Nevertheless, there are cases wherein a different refractive index might be chosen for the prism, in order to compensate for chromatic aberrations in the system. The incoming light waves are coupled directly from the air, or alternatively, the collimating module 40, can be attached to the intermediate prism 54. In many cases, the refractive index of the collimating module 40 is substantially different than that of the substrate 20, and accordingly, is different from that of the prism 54. Therefore, for minimizing the chromatic aberrations, the input surface 58 of the prism 54 should be oriented substantially normal to the central light wave of the incoming ray. In addition, the leftmost ray of the lowest angle of the FOV should pass through the prism 54. As a result, the conditions of Eqs. (2) and (3) should be fulfilled also for the configuration of FIG. 7. To eliminate the undesired phenomena of dark stripes as described with reference to FIG. 6, the relation

αsur3≥αin+Δα  (6)

must be satisfied, namely, the angle between the slanted edge of the substrate and the normal to the major surfaces of the substrate is larger than the highest angle of the FOV. Accordingly, the aperture DS of the output surface 56 of the prism 54 must fulfil the relation










D
S



d

cos


(


α
in

+
Δα

)







(
7
)







Apparently, since the light waves enter the prism 54 through the entrance surface 58 of the prism, directly cross the prism without any reflections and enter the substrate through the slanted edge 50, the expansion of the active area Dp of the entrance surface 58 in relation to the aperture DS of the exit surface 56, is minimal. In addition, as described above, in order for the leftmost ray 36 (FIG. 4) of the lowest angle of the FOV to pass through the prism 54, the angle αsur1 between the left surface 60 of the prism 54 and the normal to the major surface 26 of the substrate must also fulfil the relation of Eq. (2), namely, the angle between the surface 60 of the prism 54 and the normal to the major surfaces of the substrate, is smaller than the lowest angle of the FOV. Therefore, when the relations of Eqs. (2), (6) and (7) are fulfilled, the coupled-in light waves from the entire FOV will completely cover the major surfaces of the substrate without any stripes or gaps.


As illustrated in FIG. 8, by taking the inequalities of Eqs. (2), (6) and (7) to the limit, the internal angles of the prism 54 are: the angle between the surfaces 56 and 58 is 2αin−90°+Δα and the angle between surface 56 and 60 is 180°−2αin. Consequentially, the angle between surfaces 58 and 60 is 90°−Δα. Utilizing these values yields













D
P

=



d

cos


(


α
in

+
Δα

)




cos


(
Δα
)



·

sin


[

2
·

(


90

°

-

α
in


)


]









=


2


d
·

sin


(

α
in

)


·

cos


(

α
in

)






cos


(
Δα
)


·

cos


(


α
in

+
Δα

)











(
8
)







wherein DP is the active area of the input surface 58 of the intermediate prism 54.


Therefore, by comparing Eqs. (5) and (8), the relation between the active areas DP and DT of the input surfaces of the prisms 54 and 44 of the prior art system of FIG. 4, respectively, is:











D
P


D
T


=



sin


(

α
in

)


·

cos


(

α
in

)





sin


(


α
in

+
Δα

)


·

cos


(


α
in

-
Δα

)








(
9
)







Apparently, for a narrow FOV, that is, Δα<<αin, the improvement is negligible. However, for a relatively wide FOV the active area DP of the prism 54 should be reduced considerably compared to the active area DT of the prism 44. For example, for Δα=12° and αin=52° the reduction ratio of Eq. (9) has a significant value of DP/DT≈0.7.


In the embodiment illustrated in FIG. 3, the collimating module 40 is shown to be a simple transmission lens, however, much more compact structures utilizing reflective lenses, polarizing beamsplitters and retardation plates may be employed. In such a structure, the fact that in most microdisplay light sources, such as LCDs or LCOS light sources, the light which is linearly polarized, is exploited by optical component 61, which serves as an image projector optically integrated with the substrate such that image light is injected into the substrate along an image light output direction, as illustrated in FIG. 9. As shown, the s-polarized input light waves 62 from the display light source 64, are coupled into a light-guide 66, which is usually composed of a light waves transmitting material, through its lower surface 68. Following reflection-off of a polarizing beamsplitter 70, the light waves are coupled out of the substrate through surface 72 of the light-guide 66. The light waves then pass through a quarter-wavelength retardation plate 74, reflected by a reflecting optical element 76, e.g., a flat mirror, return to pass again through the retardation plate 74, and re-enter the light-guide 66 through surface 72. The now p-polarized light waves pass through the polarizing beamsplitter 70 and are coupled out of the light-guide through surface 78 of the light-guide 66. The light waves then pass through a second quarter-wavelength retardation plate 80, collimated by a component 82, e.g., a lens, at its reflecting surface 84, return to pass again through the retardation plate 80, and re-enter the light-guide 66 through surface 78. The now s-polarized light waves reflect off the polarizing beamsplitter 70 and exit the lightguide through the exit surface 86, attached to the intermediate prism 54. The reflecting surfaces 76 and 84 can be materialized either by a metallic or a dielectric coating.


In the embodiment illustrated in FIG. 9, the display source can be an LCD panel, however, there are optical systems, especially wherein high brightness imaging characteristics are required, where it is preferred to utilize an LCOS light source device as a display light source. Similar to LCD panels, LCOS light source panels contain a two-dimensional array of cells filled with liquid crystals that twist and align in response to control voltages. With the LCOS light source, however, the cells are grafted directly onto a reflective silicon chip. As the liquid crystals twist, the polarization of the light is either changed or unchanged following reflection of the mirrored surface below. This, together with a polarizing beamsplitter, causes modulation of the light waves and creates the image. The reflective technology means that the illumination and imaging light beams share the same space. Both of these factors necessitate the addition of a special beamsplitting optical element to the module, in order to enable the simultaneous operations of the illuminating, as well as the imaging, functions. The addition of such an element would normally complicate the module and, when using an LCOS light source as the display light source, some modules using a frontal coupling-in element or a folding prism, would become even larger. For example, the embodiment of FIG. 9 could be modified to accommodate an LCOS light source by inserting another beamsplitter between the display source 64 and the beamsplitter 66. However, this modified version may be problematic for systems with a comparatively wide FOV, wherein the focal length of the collimating module is shorter than the optical path of the rays passing through the of double beamsplitter configuration.


To solve this problem, as seen in FIG. 10, a modified image projector (optical component 90) is provided, wherein only one reflecting surface 84 is located adjacent to surface 78 of the light-guide 66. Hence, the optical path through this light-guide 66 is much shorter. As shown, the s-polarized light waves 92, emanating from a light source 94, enter the prism 96, reflect off the polarizing beamsplitter 98 and illuminate the front surface of the LCOS light source 100. The polarization of the reflected light waves from the “light” pixels is rotated to the p-polarization and the light waves are then passed through the beamsplitter 98, and consequentially, through a polarizer 102 which is located between the prisms 96 and 66 and blocks the s-polarized light which was reflected from the “dark” pixels of the LCOS light source 100. The light waves then enter the prism 66 and pass through the second beamsplitter 70, arc coupled out of the prism through surface 78 of the prism 66, pass through a quarter-wavelength retardation plate 80, collimated by a collimating lens 82 at its reflecting surface 84, return to pass again through the retardation plate 80, and re-enter the prism 66 through surface 78. The now s-polarized light waves reflect off the polarizing beamsplitter 70 and exit the prism 66 through the exit surface 86, which is attached to the intermediate prism 54.


As clearly seen in both FIGS. 9 and 10, the image projectors are here optically integrated via intermediate prism 54 with substrate 20 so that image light propagating along an image light output direction from the projector is injected into the substrate so as to undergo a first reflection after leaving the image projector at upper surface 32 of the substrate. Intermediate prism 54 defines a coupling-in region which extends beyond a thickness of substrate 20.


Returning now to FIG. 9, wherein the viewer's eye 24 is located at the same side of the slanted edge 50, the dimensions of the optical prism 66 are substantially extended over the lower major surface 26 of substrate 20 and only slightly extended over the upper surface 32. This slight extension can be completely eliminated with a proper design, for instance, by slightly increasing the angle αsur3 of the slanted edge 50.


For the embodiment which is illustrated in FIG. 10, however, the optical component 90 is substantially extended over the lower surface 26 of the substrate 20, as well as over the upper surface 32.


As illustrated in FIG. 11A, this unique configuration may be preferred for optical systems wherein a collimating module is composed of the optical component 90 of FIG. 10, having prisms 66 and 96. Optical component 90 is installed between the eyeglasses frame 104 and the substrate 20. In this case, the viewer's eye 24 is located on the opposite side of the slanted edge 50 of the substrate 20. The light waves are coupled into the substrate 20 through the slanted edge 50 towards the major surface 32, from which surface 32, it bounces towards the partially reflecting surfaces 22 and from there exit the substrate through the major surface 32 towards the viewer's eye 24. Even though there is a front extension 106 of the optical component 90 to the front part of the eyeglasses, the rear extension 108 of the prism 96 is minimal, and the entire optical component 90, can easily be integrated inside the frame 104 of the eyeglasses.


Seen in FIG. 11B is a modification based on the optical module illustrated in FIG. 9, wherein the viewer's eye 24 is located on the same side of the slanted edge 50 of the substrate 20. The light waves emanating from the optical component 90 are coupled into the substrate 20 through the slanted edge 50, enter the substrate 20 towards the major surface 26, from which surface it bounces towards the major surface 32 and from there it continues towards the partially reflecting surfaces 22, and exit the substrate though the major surface 32 towards the viewer's eye 24.


It will be evident to those skilled in the art that the invention is not limited to the details of the foregoing illustrated embodiments and that the present invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from the spirit or essential attributes thereof. The present embodiments are therefore to be considered in all respects as illustrative and not restrictive, the scope of the invention being indicated by the appended claims rather than by the foregoing description, and all changes which come within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are therefore intended to be embraced therein.

Claims
  • 1. A head-mounted display (HMD) system for mounting on the head of a viewer and providing an augmented reality display to at least one eye of the viewer, the system comprising: (a) a light-transmitting substrate having a plurality of surfaces including a planar first major surface and a planar second major surface parallel to said first major surface, said first and second major surfaces guiding image light within said substrate by internal reflection, said plurality of surfaces further comprising a slanted edge surface slanted at an oblique angle to said first major surface;(b) a coupling-out arrangement comprising a plurality of planar partially-reflective surfaces deployed within said substrate, said partially-reflective surfaces being parallel to each other and obliquely angled relative to said first major surface so as to couple image light out of the substrate towards the eye of the viewer in facing relation to said first major surface;(c) an image projector comprising a display source and collimating optics projecting a collimated image having a central image ray defining an image light output direction; and(d) a support structure for supporting said substrate with said first major surface facing towards the eye of the viewer,
  • 2. The HMD system of claim 1, wherein said coupling-in surface extends beyond a thickness of said substrate.
  • 3. The HMD system of claim 2, wherein said slanted edge forms an acute angle with said first major surface.
  • 4. The HMD system of claim 1, wherein said support structure is formed as an eyeglasses frame.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
232197 Apr 2014 IL national
US Referenced Citations (373)
Number Name Date Kind
2748659 Geffcken et al. Jun 1956 A
2795069 Hardesty Jun 1957 A
2886911 Hardesty May 1959 A
2958258 Kelly Nov 1960 A
3491245 Hardesty Jan 1970 A
3626394 Nelson et al. Dec 1971 A
3658405 Pluta Apr 1972 A
3667621 Barlow Jun 1972 A
3677621 Smith Jul 1972 A
3737212 Antonson et al. Jun 1973 A
3802763 Cook et al. Apr 1974 A
3857109 Pilloff Dec 1974 A
3873209 Schinke et al. Mar 1975 A
3940204 Withrington Feb 1976 A
3969023 Brandt et al. Jul 1976 A
4084883 Eastman et al. Apr 1978 A
4191446 Arditty et al. Mar 1980 A
4240738 Praamsma Dec 1980 A
4309070 St Leger Searle Jan 1982 A
4331387 Wentz May 1982 A
4355864 Soref Oct 1982 A
4372639 Johnson Feb 1983 A
4383740 Bordovsky May 1983 A
4516828 Steele May 1985 A
4613216 Herbec et al. Sep 1986 A
4711512 Upatnieks Dec 1987 A
4715684 Gagnon Dec 1987 A
4755667 Marsoner et al. Jul 1988 A
4775217 Ellis Oct 1988 A
4798448 Van Raalte Jan 1989 A
4799765 Ferrer Jan 1989 A
4805988 Dones Feb 1989 A
4877301 Yokomori et al. Oct 1989 A
4932743 Isobe et al. Jun 1990 A
4978952 Irwin Dec 1990 A
5033828 Haruta Jul 1991 A
5076664 Migozzi Dec 1991 A
5096520 Faris Mar 1992 A
5157526 Kondo et al. Oct 1992 A
5231642 Scifres et al. Jul 1993 A
5278532 Hegg Jan 1994 A
5301067 Bleier et al. Apr 1994 A
5353134 Michel et al. Oct 1994 A
5367399 Kramer Nov 1994 A
5369415 Richard et al. Nov 1994 A
5383053 Hegg Jan 1995 A
5453877 Gerbe et al. Sep 1995 A
5481385 Zimmerman et al. Jan 1996 A
5499138 Iba Mar 1996 A
5537260 Williamson Jul 1996 A
5539578 Togino et al. Jul 1996 A
5543877 Takashi et al. Aug 1996 A
5555329 Kuper et al. Sep 1996 A
5619601 Akashi et al. Apr 1997 A
5650873 Gal et al. Jul 1997 A
5680209 Maechler Oct 1997 A
5708449 Heacock et al. Jan 1998 A
5724163 David Mar 1998 A
5751480 Kitagishi May 1998 A
5764412 Suzuki et al. Jun 1998 A
5808709 Davis Sep 1998 A
5808800 Handschy Sep 1998 A
5829854 Jones Nov 1998 A
5880888 Schoenmakers Mar 1999 A
5883684 Millikan et al. Mar 1999 A
5886822 Spitzer Mar 1999 A
5896232 Budd et al. Apr 1999 A
5909325 Kuba et al. Jun 1999 A
5919601 Nguyen et al. Jul 1999 A
5966223 Amitai et al. Oct 1999 A
5982536 Swan Nov 1999 A
6005720 Watters et al. Dec 1999 A
6007225 Ramer Dec 1999 A
6021239 Minami et al. Feb 2000 A
6034750 Rai et al. Mar 2000 A
6052500 Takano et al. Apr 2000 A
6064335 Eschenbach et al. May 2000 A
6091548 Chen Jul 2000 A
6094625 Ralston Jul 2000 A
6144347 Mizoguchi et al. Nov 2000 A
6177952 Seiichiro et al. Jan 2001 B1
6204975 Watters et al. Mar 2001 B1
6222676 Togino et al. Apr 2001 B1
6222971 Veligdan et al. Apr 2001 B1
6256151 Ma et al. Jul 2001 B1
6266108 Bao Jul 2001 B1
6297767 Senoh Oct 2001 B1
6307612 Smith Oct 2001 B1
6310713 Doany et al. Oct 2001 B2
6322256 Inada et al. Nov 2001 B1
6324330 Stites Nov 2001 B1
6349001 Spitzer Feb 2002 B1
6362861 Hertz et al. Mar 2002 B1
6384982 Spitzer May 2002 B1
6388814 Tanaka May 2002 B2
6400493 Mertz et al. Jun 2002 B1
6404550 Yajima Jun 2002 B1
6404947 Matsuda Jun 2002 B1
6406149 Okuyama Jun 2002 B2
6433339 Maeda et al. Aug 2002 B1
6490087 Fulkerson et al. Dec 2002 B1
6490104 Gleckman et al. Dec 2002 B1
6509982 Steiner Jan 2003 B2
6547423 Marshall et al. Apr 2003 B2
6556282 Jamieson et al. Apr 2003 B2
6577411 David Jun 2003 B1
6580529 Amitai et al. Jun 2003 B1
6606173 Kappel et al. Aug 2003 B2
6671100 McRuer Dec 2003 B1
6680802 Ichikawa et al. Jan 2004 B1
6690513 Hulse et al. Feb 2004 B2
6704052 Togino et al. Mar 2004 B1
6704065 Sharp et al. Mar 2004 B1
6710902 Takeyama Mar 2004 B2
6775432 Basu Aug 2004 B2
6791760 Janeczko et al. Sep 2004 B2
6798579 Robinson et al. Sep 2004 B2
6799859 Ida et al. Oct 2004 B1
6825987 Repetto et al. Nov 2004 B2
6829095 Amitai Dec 2004 B2
6879443 Spitzer et al. Apr 2005 B2
6942925 Lazarev et al. Sep 2005 B1
6950220 Abramson et al. Sep 2005 B2
6992718 Takahara Jan 2006 B1
7016113 Choi et al. Mar 2006 B2
7021777 Amitai Apr 2006 B2
7025464 Beeson et al. Apr 2006 B2
7088664 Kim et al. Aug 2006 B2
7163291 Cado et al. Jan 2007 B2
7175304 Wadia et al. Feb 2007 B2
7205960 David Apr 2007 B2
7206133 Cassarly Apr 2007 B2
7339742 Amitai et al. Mar 2008 B2
7355795 Yamazaki et al. Apr 2008 B1
7391573 Amitai Jun 2008 B2
7392917 Alalu et al. Jul 2008 B2
7418170 Mukawa et al. Aug 2008 B2
7430355 Heikenfeld et al. Sep 2008 B2
7448170 Skendzic Milovan et al. Nov 2008 B2
7457040 Amitai Nov 2008 B2
7576916 Amitai Aug 2009 B2
7576918 Goggins Aug 2009 B2
7577326 Amitai Aug 2009 B2
7643214 Amitai Jan 2010 B2
7672055 Amitai Mar 2010 B2
7710655 Freeman et al. May 2010 B2
7724441 Amitai May 2010 B2
7724443 Amitai May 2010 B2
7751122 Amitai Jul 2010 B2
7778508 Hirayama Aug 2010 B2
7884985 Amitai et al. Feb 2011 B2
7949214 Dejong May 2011 B2
7995275 Maeda et al. Aug 2011 B2
8000020 Amitai Aug 2011 B2
8004765 Amitai Aug 2011 B2
8035872 Ouchi Oct 2011 B2
8098439 Amitai et al. Jan 2012 B2
8369019 Baker Feb 2013 B2
8405573 Lapidot et al. Mar 2013 B2
8432614 Amitai Apr 2013 B2
8643948 Amitai et al. Feb 2014 B2
8665178 Wang Mar 2014 B1
8736963 Robbins et al. May 2014 B2
8760762 Kelly Jun 2014 B1
8810914 Amitai et al. Aug 2014 B2
8861081 Amitai et al. Oct 2014 B2
8902503 Amitai et al. Dec 2014 B2
8913865 Bennett Dec 2014 B1
8965152 Simmonds Feb 2015 B2
8988776 Weber et al. Mar 2015 B2
9069180 Amitai et al. Jun 2015 B2
9104036 Amitai et al. Aug 2015 B2
9207457 Amitai Dec 2015 B2
9248616 Amitai Feb 2016 B2
9279986 Amitai Mar 2016 B2
9316832 Amitai et al. Apr 2016 B2
9417453 Amitai et al. Aug 2016 B2
9448408 Amitai et al. Sep 2016 B2
9488840 Mansharof et al. Nov 2016 B2
9500869 Amitai Nov 2016 B2
9513481 Levin et al. Dec 2016 B2
9551880 Amitai Jan 2017 B2
9568738 Mansharof et al. Feb 2017 B2
9664910 Mansharof et al. May 2017 B2
9740013 Amitai et al. Aug 2017 B2
9804396 Amitai Oct 2017 B2
9805633 Zheng Oct 2017 B2
9910283 Amitai Mar 2018 B2
9933684 Brown et al. Apr 2018 B2
9989766 Dobschal et al. Jun 2018 B2
10048499 Amitai Aug 2018 B2
10261321 Amitai Apr 2019 B2
10302835 Danziger May 2019 B2
20010013972 Doany et al. Aug 2001 A1
20010030860 Kimura et al. Oct 2001 A1
20010054989 Zavracky et al. Dec 2001 A1
20010055152 Richards Dec 2001 A1
20020008708 Weiss et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020015233 Park Feb 2002 A1
20020021498 Ohtaka Feb 2002 A1
20020080622 Pashley et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020085281 Dubin et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020167733 Roest Nov 2002 A1
20020186179 Knowles Dec 2002 A1
20020191297 Gleckman et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030007157 Hulse et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030020006 Janeczko et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030030912 Gleckman et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030063042 Friesem et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030090439 Spitzer et al. May 2003 A1
20030165017 Amitai Sep 2003 A1
20030197938 Schmidt et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030218718 Moliton et al. Nov 2003 A1
20040080718 Kojima Apr 2004 A1
20040085649 Repetto May 2004 A1
20040113818 Yokokohji et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040119986 Benke et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040130797 Leigh Travis Jul 2004 A1
20040136082 Cado et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040137189 Tellini et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040145814 Rogers Jul 2004 A1
20040218271 Hartmaier et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040233534 Nakanishi et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040263842 Puppels et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040264185 Grotsch et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050018308 Cassarly et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050023545 Camras et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050049022 Mullen Mar 2005 A1
20050078388 Amitai Apr 2005 A1
20050083592 Amitai et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050084210 Cha Apr 2005 A1
20050173719 Yonekubo et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050174641 Greenberg Aug 2005 A1
20050174658 Long et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050180687 Amitai et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050248852 Yamasaki Nov 2005 A1
20050265044 Chen et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060052146 Ou Mar 2006 A1
20060091784 Conner et al. May 2006 A1
20060119539 Kato et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060126181 Levola Jun 2006 A1
20060126182 Levola Jun 2006 A1
20060132914 Weiss et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060221266 Kato et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060228073 Mukawa et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060268421 Shimizu et al. Nov 2006 A1
20070064310 Mukawa Mar 2007 A1
20070070859 Hirayama Mar 2007 A1
20070091445 Amitai Apr 2007 A1
20070153344 Lin Jul 2007 A1
20070159673 Freeman et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070188837 Shimizu et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070206390 Brukilacchio et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070291491 Li et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080013051 Glinski et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080025667 Amitai Jan 2008 A1
20080030974 Abu-Ageel Feb 2008 A1
20080062686 Hoelen et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080068852 Goihl Mar 2008 A1
20080094586 Hirayama Apr 2008 A1
20080151379 Amitai Jun 2008 A1
20080192239 Otosaka Aug 2008 A1
20080198471 Amitai Aug 2008 A1
20080198604 Kim et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080239422 Noda Oct 2008 A1
20080278812 Amitai Nov 2008 A1
20090009719 Ryf Jan 2009 A1
20090052047 Amitai Feb 2009 A1
20090112469 Lapidot et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090122414 Amitai May 2009 A1
20090153437 Aharoni Jun 2009 A1
20090165017 Syed et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090190222 Simmonds et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090275157 Winberg et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090279180 Amitai et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090321726 Thompson Dec 2009 A1
20100020291 Kasazumi et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100067110 Amitai et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100111472 Dejong May 2010 A1
20100171680 Lapidot et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100202048 Amitai et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100202128 Saccomanno Aug 2010 A1
20100202129 Abu-Ageel Aug 2010 A1
20100214635 Sasaki et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100278480 Vasylyev et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100290127 Kessler et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100291489 Moskovits et al. Nov 2010 A1
20110007243 Tanaka Jan 2011 A1
20110019250 Aiki et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110040630 Weiss Feb 2011 A1
20110149547 Bruzzone et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110194163 Shimizu Aug 2011 A1
20110227661 Numata et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110242661 Simmonds Oct 2011 A1
20120039576 Dangel et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120057253 Takagi et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120062998 Schultz et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120069547 Gielen et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120147361 Mochizuki et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120154920 Harrison et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120218301 Miller et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120281389 Panagotacos et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120287621 Lee et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120306940 Machida Dec 2012 A1
20130022316 Pelletier et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130038933 Wang Feb 2013 A1
20130083404 Takagi et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130094712 Said Apr 2013 A1
20130120986 Xi May 2013 A1
20130141937 Katsuta et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130201690 Vissenberg et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130208498 Ouderkirk Aug 2013 A1
20130215361 Wang Aug 2013 A1
20130242392 Amirparviz et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130321432 Burns et al. Dec 2013 A1
20130334504 Thompson et al. Dec 2013 A1
20140003762 Macnamara Jan 2014 A1
20140043688 Schrader et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140177049 Beck Jun 2014 A1
20140185142 Gupta et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140192539 Yriberri et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140226215 Komatsu Aug 2014 A1
20140226361 Vasylyev Aug 2014 A1
20140240834 Mason Aug 2014 A1
20140264420 Edwards et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140293434 Cheng Oct 2014 A1
20140334126 Speier et al. Nov 2014 A1
20140374377 Schulz et al. Dec 2014 A1
20150009682 Clough Jan 2015 A1
20150009687 Lin Jan 2015 A1
20150016777 Abovitz et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150049486 Jung et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150081313 Boross et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150098206 Pickard et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150103151 Carls et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150138451 Amitai May 2015 A1
20150138646 Tatsugi May 2015 A1
20150153569 Yonekubo Jun 2015 A1
20150153576 Takagi Jun 2015 A1
20150160529 Popovich et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150219834 Nichol et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150241619 Richards et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150247617 Du et al. Sep 2015 A1
20150260992 Luttmann Sep 2015 A1
20160041387 Valera et al. Feb 2016 A1
20160116743 Amitai Apr 2016 A1
20160170214 Amitai Jun 2016 A1
20160215956 Smith et al. Jul 2016 A1
20160234485 Robbins et al. Aug 2016 A1
20160238844 Dobschal Aug 2016 A1
20160341964 Amitai Nov 2016 A1
20160370693 Watanabe Dec 2016 A1
20170045743 Dobschal et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170045744 Amitai Feb 2017 A1
20170075119 Schultz et al. Mar 2017 A1
20170176755 Cai Jun 2017 A1
20170242249 Wall Aug 2017 A1
20170336636 Amitai et al. Nov 2017 A1
20170343822 Border et al. Nov 2017 A1
20170357095 Amitai Dec 2017 A1
20170363799 Ofir Dec 2017 A1
20180039082 Amitai Feb 2018 A1
20180067315 Amitai et al. Mar 2018 A1
20180157057 Gelberg et al. Jun 2018 A1
20180292599 Ofir et al. Oct 2018 A1
20190011710 Amitai Jan 2019 A1
20190056600 Danziger et al. Feb 2019 A1
20190064518 Danziger Feb 2019 A1
20190155035 Amitai May 2019 A1
20190170327 Eisenfeld et al. Jun 2019 A1
20190208187 Danziger Jul 2019 A1
20190212487 Danziger et al. Jul 2019 A1
20190227215 Danziger et al. Jul 2019 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (59)
Number Date Country
357371 Feb 1929 BE
101542346 Sep 2009 CN
103513424 Jan 2014 CN
107238928 Oct 2017 CN
1422172 Nov 1970 DE
19725262 Dec 1998 DE
380035 Aug 1990 EP
0566004 Oct 1993 EP
580952 Feb 1994 EP
1180711 Feb 2002 EP
1385023 Jan 2004 EP
1779159 May 2007 EP
2558776 Feb 2013 EP
2496905 Jun 1982 FR
2638242 Apr 1990 FR
2721872 Jan 1996 FR
1321303 Jun 1973 GB
2220081 Dec 1989 GB
2272980 Jun 1994 GB
2278222 Nov 1994 GB
2278888 Dec 1994 GB
39400 Apr 2006 IL
39401 Jul 2006 IL
178531 Aug 2008 IL
178532 Aug 2008 IL
199288 Feb 2015 IL
226338 Jun 2017 IL
H1994242260 Mar 1996 JP
2001021448 Jan 2001 JP
2002350771 Dec 2002 JP
2002368762 Dec 2002 JP
2003140081 May 2003 JP
2003536102 Dec 2003 JP
2005084522 Mar 2005 JP
2006003872 Jan 2006 JP
2009515225 Apr 2009 JP
2010060770 Mar 2010 JP
2010170606 Aug 2010 JP
6242260 Oct 2015 JP
101470387 Dec 2014 KR
9314393 Jul 1993 WO
9815868 Apr 1998 WO
55676 Sep 2000 WO
0127685 Apr 2001 WO
02088825 Nov 2002 WO
3058320 Jul 2003 WO
2004053541 Jun 2004 WO
2005024485 Mar 2005 WO
2006098097 Sep 2006 WO
2008023367 Feb 2008 WO
2008129539 Oct 2008 WO
2009009268 Jan 2009 WO
2009074638 Jun 2009 WO
2011130720 Oct 2011 WO
2013065656 May 2013 WO
2013188464 Dec 2013 WO
2015081313 Jun 2015 WO
2017199232 Nov 2017 WO
2018138714 Aug 2018 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (1)
Entry
Da-Yong et al., “A Continuous Membrance Micro Deformable Mirror Based on Anodic Bonding of SOI to Glass Water”, Microsystem Technologies, Micro and Nanosystems Information Storage and Processing Systems, vol. 16, No. 10, May 20, 2010 pp. 1765-1769.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20190155035 A1 May 2019 US
Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 15305933 US
Child 16260161 US