The present invention relates to substrate-guided optical devices, and particularly to devices which include a plurality of reflecting surfaces carried by a common light-transmissive substrate, also referred to as a light-guide element.
The invention can be implemented to advantage in a large number of imaging applications, such as portable DVDs, cellular phones, mobile TV receivers, video games, portable media players or any other mobile display devices.
One application for compact optical elements concerns head-mounted displays (HMDs), wherein ark optical module serves both as an imaging lens and a combiner, wherein a two-dimensional image source is imaged to infinity and reflected into the eye of an observer. The display source may originate directly from a spatial light modulator (SLM), such as a cathode ray tube (CRT), a liquid crystal display (LCD), an organic light emitting diode array (OLED), a scanning source or similar devices, or indirectly, by means of a relay lens, an optical fiber bundle, or similar devices. The display source comprises an array of elements (pixels) imaged to infinity by a collimating lens and transmitted into the eye of the viewer by means of a reflecting, or partially reflecting, surface acting as a combiner for non-see-through and see-through applications, respectively. Typically, a conventional, free-space optical module is used for these purposes. As the desired field-of-view (FOV) of the system increases, however, such a conventional optical module becomes larger, heavier and bulkier, and therefore, even for a moderate performance device, is impractical. This is a major drawback for all kinds of displays and especially in head-mounted applications, wherein the system should necessarily be as light and as compact as possible.
The strive for compactness has led to several different complex optical solutions, all of which, on the one hand, are still not sufficiently compact for most practical applications, and, on the other hand, suffer major drawbacks with respect to manufacturability. Furthermore, the eye-motion-box (EMB) of the optical viewing angles resulting from these designs is usually very small—typically less than 8 mm. Hence, the performance of the optical system is very sensitive, even for small movements of the optical system relative to the eye of a viewer, and does not allow sufficient pupil motion for comfortable reading of a text from such displays.
The teachings included in Publication Nos. WO 01/95027, WO 03/081320, WO2005/024485, WO2005/024491, WO2005/024969, WO2005/124427, WO2006/013565, WO2006/085309, WO2006/085310, WO2006/087709, WO2007/054928, WO2007/093983, WO2008/023367, WO2008/12.9539, WO2008/149339 and WO2013/175465, all in the name of Applicant, are herein incorporated by reference.
The present invention facilitates the exploitation of very compact light-guide optical element (LOE) for, amongst other applications, HMDs. The invention allows relatively wide FOVs together with relatively large EMB values. The resulting optical system offers a large, high-quality image, which also accommodates large movements of the eye. The optical system disclosed by the present invention is particularly advantageous because it is substantially more compact than state-of-the-art implementations and yet it can be readily incorporated even into optical systems having specialized configurations.
A broad object of the present invention is therefore to alleviate the drawbacks of prior art compact optical display devices and to provide other optical components and systems having improved performance, according to specific requirements,
In accordance with the present invention, there is provided an optical system, comprising a light-transmitting substrate having at least two major surfaces and. edges; an optical prism having at least a first, a second and a third surface, for coupling light waves having a given field-of-view into the substrate by total internal reflection; at least one partially reflecting surface located in the substrate, the partially reflecting surface being orientated non-parallelly with respect to the major surfaces of said substrate, for coupling light waves out of the substrate; at least one of the edges of the substrate is slanted at an oblique angle with respect to the major surfaces; the second surface of the prism is located adjacent to the slanted edge of the substrate, and a part of the substrate located next to the slanted edge is substantially transparent, characterized in that the light waves enter the prism through the first surface of the prism, traverse the prism without any reflection and enter the substrate through the slanted edge.
The invention is described in connection with certain preferred embodiments, with reference to the following illustrative figures so that it may be more fully understood.
With specific reference to the figures in detail, it is stressed that the particulars shown are by way of example and for purposes of illustrative discussion of the preferred embodiments of the present invention only, and are presented in the cause of providing what is believed to be the most useful and readily understood description of the principles and conceptual aspects of the invention. In this regard, no attempt is made to show structural details of the invention in more detail than is necessary for a fundamental understanding of the invention. The description taken with the drawings are to serve as direction to those skilled in the art as to how the several forms of the invention may be embodied in practice.
In the drawings:
The present invention relates to substrate-guided optical devices, in particular, compact HMD optical systems. Usually, a collimated image having a finite FOV is coupled into a substrate. As illustrated in
The object of the present invention is to find a light wave coupling-in mechanism which is different to the coupling-in mechanism of the prior art and having more compact dimensions. In
A possible embodiment for coupling the marginal rays into the substrate 20 is illustrated in
In order to minimize the dimensions of the collimating module 40, the aperture DT of the input surface 46 of the coupling-in prism 44 should be as small as possible. As a result, the dimensions of the coupling-in prism would also be minimized accordingly, while the coupled rays of the entire FOV will pass through the coupling-in prism 44.
As illustrated in
DL≥2d·tan(αin+Δα) (1)
wherein d is the thickness of the substrate 20,
In addition, in order for the leftmost ray 36 of the lowest angle of the FOV to pass through the prism 44, the angle αsur1 between the left surface 48 of the prism 44 and the normal to the major surface 26 of the substrate 20 must fulfil the relation
αsur1≤αin−Δα (2)
For minimizing the chromatic aberrations of the optical waves passing through the prism 44, it is advantageous to orient the input surface 46 of the coupling-in prism 44 to be substantially normal to the central wave 14 of the image. As a result, the angle αsur2 between the entrance surface 46 of the prism 44 and the normal to the major surface 26 of the substrate 20 is
αsur2=90°−αin (3)
Taking the inequality of Eq. 2 to the limit, in order to minimize the dimensions of the prism 44 yields the following internal angles of the prism: the angle between the surfaces 46 and 21 is αin; the angle between surface 48 and 21 is 90°−αin+Δα. Consequentially, the angle between surfaces 46 and 48 is 90°−Δα. Utilizing these values yields
Taking the inequality of Eq. 1 to the limit and inserting it in Eq. 4 yields
Although the optical system illustrated in
This situation is solved by the embodiment shown in
Thus, manufacturing of the display, illustrated schematically in
In many cases, the refractive index of the collimating module 40 is substantially different than that of the substrate 20, and accordingly, is different from that of the prism 54. Therefore, for minimizing the chromatic aberrations, the input surface 58 of the prism 54 should be oriented substantially normal to the central light wave of the incoming ray. In addition, the leftmost ray of the lowest angle of the FOV should pass through the prism 54. As a result, the conditions of Eqs. (2) and (3) should be fulfilled also for the configuration of
αsur3≥αin+Δα (6)
must be satisfied, namely, the angle between the slanted edge of the substrate and the normal to the major surfaces of the substrate is larger than the highest angle of the FOV. Accordingly, the aperture D of the output surface 56 of the prism 54 must fulfil the relation
Apparently, since the light waves enter the prism 54 through the entrance surface 58 of the prism, directly cross the prism without any reflections and enter the substrate through the slanted edge 50, the expansion of the active area Dp of the entrance surface 58 in relation to the aperture Ds of the exit surface 56, is minimal. In addition, as described above, in order for the leftmost ray 36 (
As illustrated in
wherein DP is the active area of the input surface 58 of the intermediate prism 54.
Therefore, by comparing Eqs. (5) and (8), the relation between the active areas DP and DT of the input surfaces of the prisms 54 and 44 of the prior art system of
Apparently, for a narrow FOV, that is, Δα<<αin, the improvement is negligible. However, for a relatively wide FOV the active area DP of the prism 54 should be reduced considerably compared to the active area DT of the prism 44. For example, for Δα=12° and αin=52° the reduction ratio of Eq. (9) has a significant value of DP/DT≈0.7.
In the embodiment illustrated in
In the embodiment illustrated in
To solve this problem, as seen in
Returning now to
For the embodiment which is illustrated in
As illustrated in
Seen in
It will be evident to those skilled in the art that the invention is not limited to the details of the foregoing illustrated embodiments and that the present invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from the spirit or essential attributes thereof. The present embodiments are therefore to be considered in all respects as illustrative and not restrictive, the scope of the invention being indicated by the appended claims rather than by the foregoing description, and all changes which come within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are therefore intended to be embraced therein.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
232197 | Apr 2014 | IL | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
8760762 | Kelly et al. | Jun 2014 | B1 |
9285591 | Gupta et al. | Mar 2016 | B1 |
9696479 | Hugel | Jul 2017 | B2 |
11187905 | Amitai | Nov 2021 | B2 |
20040085649 | Repetto | May 2004 | A1 |
20070007157 | Buschmann et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070064310 | Mukawa et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070091445 | Amitai | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20080106775 | Amitai et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080151379 | Amitai | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080186604 | Amitai | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080198471 | Amitai | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080239422 | Noda | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080278812 | Amitai | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080285140 | Amitai | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090052046 | Amitai | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090052047 | Amitai | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090097127 | Amitai | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090122414 | Amitai | May 2009 | A1 |
20090153437 | Aharoni | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20100020204 | Fleischer et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100067110 | Hadad | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100171680 | Lapidot et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20110194163 | Shimizu et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20120147361 | Mochizuki et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120179369 | Lapidot et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120182525 | Imai et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20130229717 | Amitai | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130276960 | Amitai | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130279017 | Amitai | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140118813 | Amitai et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140118836 | Amitai et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140118837 | Amitai et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140126051 | Amitai et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140126052 | Amitai et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140126056 | Amitai et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140126057 | Amitai et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140126175 | Amitai et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140226215 | Komatsu | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140293434 | Cheng | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150138451 | Amitai | May 2015 | A1 |
20150160460 | Komatsu et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150198805 | Mansharof | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150205140 | Mansharof et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150205141 | Mansharof et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150260992 | Luttmann et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150277127 | Amitai | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150293360 | Amitai | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20160116743 | Amitai | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160170212 | Amitai | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160170213 | Amitai | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160170214 | Amitai | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160187656 | Amitai | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160282622 | Hiraide | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160341964 | Amitai | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160349518 | Amitai et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170045744 | Amitai | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170052376 | Amitai | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170052377 | Amitai | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170336636 | Amitai et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170357095 | Amitai | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20170363799 | Ofir et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180039082 | Amitai | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180067315 | Amitai et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180157057 | Gelberg et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180210202 | Danziger | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180267317 | Amitai | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180275384 | Danziger et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180292592 | Danziger | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180292599 | Ofir et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180373039 | Amitai | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190011710 | Amitai | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190056600 | Danziger et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190064518 | Danziger | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190155035 | Amitai | May 2019 | A1 |
20190170327 | Eisenfeld et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190208187 | Danziger | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190212487 | Danziger et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190227215 | Danziger et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190278086 | Ofir | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190285900 | Amitai | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190293856 | Danziger | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190339530 | Amitai | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190346609 | Eisenfeld | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190361240 | Gelberg | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190361241 | Amitai | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190377187 | Rubin et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20190391408 | Mansharof | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20200033572 | Danziger et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200041713 | Danziger | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200089001 | Amitai et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200110211 | Danziger et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200120329 | Danziger | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200133008 | Amitai | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200150330 | Danziger et al. | May 2020 | A1 |
20200183159 | Danziger | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200183170 | Amitai et al. | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200200963 | Eisenfeld et al. | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200209667 | Sharlin et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200241308 | Danziger et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200249481 | Danziger et al. | Aug 2020 | A1 |
20200278557 | Greenstein et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20200285060 | Amitai | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20200292417 | Lobachinsky et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20200292744 | Danziger | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20200292819 | Danziger et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20200310024 | Danziger et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200326545 | Amitai et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200371311 | Lobachinsky et al. | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20210003849 | Amitai et al. | Jan 2021 | A1 |
20210018755 | Amitai | Jan 2021 | A1 |
20210033773 | Danziger et al. | Feb 2021 | A1 |
20210033862 | Danziger et al. | Feb 2021 | A1 |
20210033872 | Rubin et al. | Feb 2021 | A1 |
20210055218 | Aldaag et al. | Feb 2021 | A1 |
20210055466 | Eisenfeld | Feb 2021 | A1 |
20210055561 | Danziger et al. | Feb 2021 | A1 |
20210063733 | Ronen | Mar 2021 | A1 |
20210072553 | Danziger et al. | Mar 2021 | A1 |
20210099691 | Danziger | Apr 2021 | A1 |
20220004007 | Bhakta | Jan 2022 | A1 |
20220107499 | Amitai | Apr 2022 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
104503087 | Apr 2015 | CN |
102019205138 | Oct 2019 | DE |
2003140081 | May 2003 | JP |
2014033035 | Mar 2014 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210157150 A1 | May 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15305933 | US | |
Child | 16260161 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16260161 | Jan 2019 | US |
Child | 17163676 | US |