Compact, high-efficiency, gas/liquid separator method and apparatus

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6364940
  • Patent Number
    6,364,940
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, August 13, 1996
    28 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 2, 2002
    22 years ago
Abstract
A method and apparatus for separating a wellhead fluid mixture containing oil and gas phases obtained from hydrocarbon production systems into its constituent parts employs a pressure vessel having an inlet for entry of the wellhead fluids mixture and an outlet for exit of a separated gas referred to as export gas. A primary centrifugal separator is provided in the pressure vessel for centrifugally separating a first portion of the oil from the wellhead fluids mixture to produce a wet gas containing some remaining oil. A second centrifugal separator is also provided in the vessel and performs a second centrifugal separation operation on the wet gas to remove substantially all of the remaining oil from the wet gas to produce the export gas which is conveyed out of the pressure vessel. The oil and remaining oil separated from the wellhead fluids mixture is conveyed from the pressure vessel via another outlet.
Description




FIELD AND BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




The present invention relates in general, to separation systems and, in particular, to a new and useful method and apparatus for separating a multiple phase mixture into separate vapor and liquid phases utilizing single or multiple pairs of centrifugal force separators. The present invention is particularly suited for applications involving the separation of oil and gas phases contained in wellhead fluids obtained from hydrocarbon production systems. The present invention can be employed either topside or in subsea locations.




Most of the known gas/oil separation systems rely on natural or gravity separation which requires large vessels to achieve the desired separation performance. When natural separation is used in a relatively small vessel, the throughput or vapor flux of that system is significantly smaller when compared to other systems not relying on natural separation. An example of a system which apparently uses natural separation is described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,982,794.




One known separation system is disclosed in UK Patent Application No. GB 2 203 062 A and uses centrifugal separation for a primary separation stage and inertial separation (i.e., scrubbers) for a second stage of separation. Although this system most likely has higher separation capacities than a system relying on natural separation, it most likely has less capacity when compared to a system that could employ centrifugal separation for both stages.




Presently, there is no known gas/oil separation system or method for separating a multiple phase mixture of oil and gas into separate vapor and liquid phases utilizing single or multiple pairs of centrifugal force separators.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




The present invention is drawn to a method and apparatus particularly suited for separating a wellhead fluid mixture containing oil and gas phases obtained from hydrocarbon production systems into its constituent parts. The present invention can be employed either topside or in subsea applications through the use of a compact and highly efficient separator arrangement.




More particularly, one aspect of the present invention is drawn to a separation apparatus which utilizes one or more curved-arm, centrifugal force, primary separator(s) and one or more cyclone, centrifugal force, secondary separator(s). Except for some changes made to the curved-arms, the primary separator is very similar to the separator described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,648,890 to Kidwell et al., assigned to The Babcock & Wilcox Company. The secondary separator is similar to the separator described in U.S. Pat. No. 3,324,634 to Brahler et al., also assigned to The Babcock & Wilcox Company. The primary and secondary separators are always employed in pairs, and the combination of a centrifugal-type primary and secondary separator as utilized by the present invention provides a compact and highly-efficient separator arrangement. The separator apparatus can be used in multiple pairs (two or more primary and two or more secondary separators) or in an apparatus having only a single primary and a single secondary separator. The multiple pair arrangement would be typically used for topside applications while the single primary/single secondary separator arrangement would typically be sufficient to satisfy most subsea applications.




Another aspect of the present invention is drawn to a method for separating a wellhead fluid mixture obtained from hydrocarbon production systems containing oil and gas phases into its constituent parts, using the broad concepts discussed above.




Currently, topside or platform separation is normally performed using gravity separation which requires very large drum or pressure vessel volumes. Not only is the present invention less costly to fabricate due to its smaller size than known separation devices, but the reduced size of the gas/oil separator of the present invention thus requires less platform space, an economically attractive feature since the cost of platforms is directly related to the size of the vessels.




The present invention also provides a unique and efficient compact apparatus for subsea separation of a gas and liquid mixture. In a subsea application, the present invention provides the most benefit for marginal field developments because without subsea separation, marginal fields may become economically unfeasible to operate.




As is well-known, subsea separation provides for the separation of vapor and liquid phases prior to transporting the fluids to a platform or production facility. Fewer technical challenges are involved with first separating the phases and then separately transporting them downstream as compared to transporting a multi-phase mixture of gas and oil where slugging and hydrate formation issues are prevalent.




Presently, no other apparatus is known which provides a combination of centrifugal force primary and secondary separators having the compactness and high capacity separation efficiency of the present invention.




The various features of novelty which characterize the invention are pointed out with particularity in the claims annexed to and forming a part of this disclosure. For a better understanding of the invention, its operating advantages and specific results attained by its uses, reference is made to the accompanying drawings and descriptive matter in which preferred embodiments of the invention are illustrated.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




In the drawings:





FIG. 1

is a schematic sectional view illustrating a first embodiment of the present invention utilizing plural primary and plural secondary centrifugal separators;





FIG. 2

is a cross-sectional view taken in the direction of arrows


2





2


of

FIG. 1

;





FIG. 3

is a schematic sectional view illustrating a second embodiment of the present invention utilizing a single primary and a single secondary centrifugal separators;





FIG. 4

is a cross-sectional view taken in the direction of arrows


4





4


of

FIG. 3

;





FIG. 5

is a close-up, perspective view of a curved-arm, primary separator and a cyclone, secondary separator according to the present invention; and





FIG. 6

is a graph plotting test results for liquid flow versus vapor flow in a centrifugal separator arrangement according to the present invention.











DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS




Referring to the drawings generally, wherein like numerals designate the same or functionally similar elements throughout the several drawings, and to

FIG. 1

in particular, one aspect of the present invention is drawn to a compact, high-efficiency, multiple pair, centrifugal gas/oil separator apparatus, generally designated


10


, for separating wellhead fluids


12


obtained from hydrocarbon production systems into separate oil and gas phases. As used herein, the term wellhead fluid means any two-phase mixture of oil and gas substantially in its natural state as extracted from the earth, or as transported from its extraction point to the gas/oil separator of the present invention.




The gas/oil separator


10


comprises a drum or pressure vessel


14


having a wellhead fluid inlet


16


for providing the wellhead fluids


12


(typically crude oil and entrained gases) into the pressure vessel


14


. A gas export outlet


18


is located at an end opposite the fluid inlet


16


of pressure vessel


14


for conveying separated gases


20


from the pressure vessel


14


. Pressure vessel


14


includes an oil/liquid export outlet


22


for conveying separated oil/liquids


24


from the pressure vessel


14


. As shown in

FIG. 1

, pressure vessel


14


is oriented substantially vertically, with the wellhead fluid inlet


16


located generally at a lower end thereof, the gas export outlet


18


located at an upper end thereof, and the liquid export outlet


22


located at some intermediate location.




The oil/gas separator


10


employs multiple pairs of centrifugal force separators; in particular, one or more curved-arm, centrifugal force, primary separator(s)


30


and one or more cyclone, centrifugal force, secondary separator(s)


50


. Since these primary and secondary separators


30


,


50


are similar to those described in the aforementioned U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,648,890 and 3,324,634, the text of same is hereby incorporated by reference and the reader is referred to same as needed for specific details. The primary and secondary separators


30


,


50


are always employed in pairs, and the combination of a centrifugal-type primary and secondary separator as utilized by the present invention provides a compact and highly-efficient separator arrangement. The wellhead fluids


12


are first acted upon by the curved-arm, centrifugal force, primary separator(s)


30


which perform a first centrifugal force separation of oil/liquids


26


from the two-phase wellhead fluids


12


, producing a wet gas


28


with some remaining oil/liquid


29


therein. Then, the cyclone, centrifugal force, secondary separator(s)


50


, located above and paired together with the curved-arm, centrifugal force, primary separator(s)


30


, perform a second centrifugal force separation operation on the wet gas


28


leaving the primary separator(s)


30


, from which a majority of the liquid has been removed, to remove as much of the remaining oil/liquid


29


from the wet gas


28


as possible.




Over 95 percent of the liquid in the wellhead fluids mixture


12


is separated therefrom by the primary separator(s)


30


, and practically all of the remaining liquid in the wet gas


28


exiting the primary separator(s)


30


is removed by the secondary separators


50


. Both the oil/liquid


26


removed by the primary separator


30


and the oil/liquid


29


removed by the secondary separator


50


are returned by gravity into a lower portion of the pressure vessel


14


forming a liquid inventory


31


therein. The high separation capacity of the primary and secondary separators


30


,


50


allows for use of a single pair of primary and secondary separators if necessary, as shown in the embodiment of FIG.


3


. As mentioned earlier, the single primary/single secondary separator arrangement would typically be sufficient to satisfy most subsea applications and thus facilitates design optimization and confirmation testing at prototypic conditions described in greater detail later.




As illustrated in

FIGS. 1 and 5

, each curved-arm, centrifugal force, primary separator


30


comprises a riser tube


32


for conveying the wellhead fluids mixture


12


upwardly therethrough, four sets of multilayered curved-arms


34


, and an outer can or return cylinder


36


surrounding riser tube


32


and curved-arms


34


. As indicated earlier, the curved-arms


34


of the primary separator(s)


30


need not be of the re-entrant type disclosed in the aforementioned U.S. Pat. No. 4,648,890; curved-arms


34


may also be just attached to the outside wall of riser tube


32


.




Each multi-layered curved-arm


34


is formed of an axially extending curved wall which has an axially extending inner root edge


34




b


at the riser tube


32


, and an axially extending outer edge


34




c


, the wall curving outwardly away from the riser tube. The riser tube has a closed upper end


32




a


. Radial partitions


34




a


divide the interior of the curved-arms


34


into their multiple layers.




The wellhead fluids mixture


12


enters at the bottom of the riser tube


32


and flows upwardly therethrough until reaching the vicinity of the curved-arms


34


, where it exits the riser tube


32


. The majority of the oil/liquid separation from the wellhead fluids mixture


12


occurs as the mixture


12


flows through the curved-arms


34


, the denser oil/liquids


26


in the mixture


12


tending towards the outer walls of the curved-arms


34


. During the centrifugal separation process, a film of oil/liquid


26


develops on the inner wall of the return cylinder


36


and cascades down to the main liquid inventory


31


FIG.


1


). The return cylinder


36


extends above the top of the curved-arms


34


where there are a number of perforations


38


, preferably ½ inch in diameter, and a retaining lip


40


at open top


42


of separator


30


which are used to improve the liquid removal capabilities of the separator


30


at high gas and liquid flows, and especially where slug conditions can exist. Various perforation geometries may be employed. The wet gas


28


exits the open top


42


of the primary separator(s)


30


into a substantially open interstage region


44


which is used to more evenly distribute the wet gas


28


prior to its entering the secondary cyclone(s)


50


. This interstage region


44


also permits liquid droplets to fall out by gravity when wet gas flow


28


is below the droplet entrainment threshold. To ensure that the export gas


20


is as dry as possible, a required spacing distance indicated at reference numeral


46


in

FIG. 5

is maintained between the primary separators


30


and the secondary separators


50


, preferably at approximately 4 feet.




A separation distance is also maintained between the top of the multi-layered curved-arms


34


and the open top


42


of the primary separator


30


, indicated at reference numeral


48


, and preferably ranges from approximately 15 to approximately 18 inches. Liquid removal capacity can be increased by extending this distance.




As the two-phase wellhead fluid mixture


12


flows out through the curved-arms


34


, separation occurs as the heavier oil/liquid droplets


26


migrate to the outer radius of the curved-arms


34


and the less dense wet gas


28


migrates to the inner radius of the curved-arms


34


. Separation in the curved-arms


34


allows for an oil/liquid film


26


to be cleanly discharged onto the inner diameter of the return cylinder


36


. The retaining lip


40


and perforations


38


are important at high wellhead fluids mixture


12


flows because the retaining lip


40


restricts the growth of the oil/liquid film


26


upwardly while the perforations


38


remove the separated oil/liquid


26


from the inside of the return cylinder


36


allowing it to return by gravity along the outside of return cylinder


36


to become a part of oil/liquid inventory


31


. After flowing through the primary separator


30


, the majority of separated oil/liquid


26


spirals downward on the inner diameter of the return cylinder


36


and combines with the liquid inventory


31


in the pressure vessel


14


. The wet gas


28


and any remaining entrained oil/liquid droplets


29


enter the secondary separator


50


where the oil/liquid


29


is centrifugally separated from the wet gas


28


. The separated oil/liquid


29


is returned to form a part of the liquid inventory


31


via drain tube


52


and the liquid-free vapor or export gas


20


exits the pressure vessel


14


as shown in FIG.


1


.




The primary separator


30


has several advantages. The first is that the majority of the separation processes occur at the curved-arms


34


. This makes the process inherently capable of accommodating a wide range of flow and level conditions and minimizes the potential for gas entrainment and resultant swelling in the pressure vessel


14


's liquid inventory


31


. Another advantage is that the relatively large flow passages of the curved-arms


34


essentially eliminates the risk of pluggage since there are no narrow gaps which could attract deposits. The result is a low-pressure drop, high performance primary separator


30


that will have a long life of maintenance-free service.




The secondary separator


50


also operates on the principle of centrifugal separation. The wet gas


28


enters the secondary separator


50


through tangential inlet vanes


54


at the bottom of the secondary separator


50


which impart a centrifugal motion to the wet gas


28


. Any liquid remaining in the wet gas


28


is then forced to the inner wall of the secondary separator


50


where it is separated by secondary skimmer slots


56


, exits through secondary outlet


57


, and spills into secondary compartment


58


(FIG.


1


). Secondary separator(s)


50


would typically be inserted through and supported by plate


60


, to which would also be connected drain tubes


52


. Bypass holes


62


are placed in top plate


64


of a tertiary compartment


59


to allow gas bypassing through the secondary skimmer slots


56


to exit the tertiary compartment


59


and enhance the skimming action. The separated oil/liquid


29


then drains via drain tube


52


back into lower portion of pressure vessel


14


and becomes a part of the main pressure vessel


14


's liquid inventory


31


. The drain tube


52


isolates the returning separated oil/liquid


29


from the upflowing wet gas flow


28


and avoids the re-entrainment of separated oil/liquid


29


by the upflowing wet gas


28


.




The centrifugal force cyclone, secondary separator


50


has an inherent advantage over scrubber or mesh type dryers. Both scrubber and mesh type dryers are limited in flow capacity by the droplet entrainment threshold, beyond which liquid droplets are entrained with the vapor and are carried therewith. The centrifugal force cyclone, secondary separator


50


, on the other hand, can efficiently operate at vapor fluxes typically two to three times higher than the droplet entrainment threshold.





FIG. 3

illustrates a second aspect or embodiment of the present invention which comprises a single pair, centrifugal, gas/oil separator apparatus generally designated


70


, for subsea applications. In this embodiment, the pressure vessel


14


is supported and partially contained by a pipe or conduit


72


partially embedded within a seabed


74


. The pressure vessel


14


, as shown in

FIG. 4

, includes a radial, side wellhead fluid inlet


76


for providing the wellhead fluids


12


into the vessel


14


as well as an oil/liquid export outlet


78


for conveying separated oil or liquids


24


out of the pressure vessel


14


and a gas export outlet


80


for conveying separated gases


20


from the pressure vessel


14


. The height between export gas outlet


80


and the top of the conduit


72


is indicated at reference numeral


82


and is preferably approximately 5 feet. The height of the return cylinder


36


is indicated at reference numeral


84


and is dependent on inventory and level control requirements.





FIG. 6

illustrates the performance characteristics of a single-module centrifugal separator pair in a steam/water environment. The results from a steam/water test at 880 psia test pressure were used for conservatively estimating gas/oil separator performance. These estimates suggest that a single centrifugal separator pair (one primary and one secondary separator) can effectively separate over 43,000 barrels per day BPD) of oil and over 20 million standard cubic feet per day (20,000,000 SCFD or 20 MM SCFD) of gas for high pressure (approximately 1000 psia) applications and over 34,000 BPD oil and 15 MMSCFD gas for low pressure (approximately 250 psia) applications. The peak production for a typical water driven 10-well field is around 25,000 BPD and 14 MMSCFD.




The unique features of the present invention are noted and summarized below:




1. One unique feature of the present invention is the use of centrifugal-type separators for both the primary and secondary stages of separation. Other separator arrangements typically rely on gravity or inertial separation, which is limited in flow capacity by the droplet entrainment threshold beyond which liquid droplets are entrained with the vapor which are carried downstream. In contrast, the secondary separator of the present invention is a centrifugal-type separator which can efficiently operate at vapor fluxes significantly higher than the entrainment threshold.




2. The compactness of the present invention is also unique. The separation envelope needed for a single-module, centrifugal gas/oil separator arrangement is approximately 4 feet long by 2 feet in diameter. Additional drum or pressure vessel


14


volume may be required to satisfy other system parameters such as inventory demands and liquid level control requirements. A pump


86


for pumping separated liquids and a provision for removing sand


90


from the liquid inventory


31


, such as a sand separator or pump schematically indicated at


88


, may be incorporated into the gas/oil separator arrangement


70


for certain applications as shown in FIG.


3


.




3. Another unique feature of the present invention is the manner in which the centrifugal forces are generated in the primary separator


30


. The centrifugal force develops as the mixture turns 90° out of the riser tube


32


and flows out through the curved-arms


34


. This feature allows the two-phase wellhead fluids mixture


12


to enter the pressure vessel


14


through either a lower axial inlet to the riser tube


32



FIG. 1

) or through a side, radial inlet to riser tube


32



FIG. 3

) providing design flexibility for introducing the wellhead fluids


12


into the gas/oil separator arrangements


10


,


70


. Other known separator designs used for gas/oil applications rely on a radial or tangential inlet into the primary separator to create the centrifugal forces.




The compact, high-efficiency, gas/oil separator arrangements


10


,


70


of the present invention offer several advantages when compared to the known designs. These advantages include a high vapor capacity, a compact arrangement, and maintenance-free characteristics of the separation equipment.




Another advantage of the present invention is that the primary and secondary centrifugal separators


30


,


50


have no moving parts and no small passages. This eliminates the potential for hardware pluggage and provides for reliable, long-term, maintenance-free operation, which is extremely beneficial for subsea gas/oil separation applications where accessing the equipment for unplanned maintenance has proven to be very costly.




The compactness of the present invention provides economical advantages because of the reduced capital to initially fabricate the unit and because of reduced space requirements and/or lifting capacity required to install the equipment topside or subsea.




While specific embodiments of the invention have been shown and described in detail to illustrate the application of the principles of the invention, it will be understood that the invention may be embodied otherwise without departing from such principles.



Claims
  • 1. An apparatus for separating an oil/liquid phase from a gas phase contained in a wellhead fluid from a hydrocarbon production system, comprising, in combination with the hydrocarbon production system:a vessel having a wellhead fluid inlet connected to the hydrocarbon production system, for entry of wellhead fluid, a gas export outlet for exit of export gas separated from the wellhead fluid, and an oil/liquid export outlet for exit of oil/liquid separated from the wellhead fluid; means in the vessel defining a main oil/liquid inventory compartment at a lower end of the vessel, the oil/liquid export outlet communicating with the inventory compartment, a secondary compartment at an upper end of the vessel, and means for connecting the inventory and secondary compartments to each other; a primary centrifugal separator in the vessel for separating a majority of the oil/liquid phase from the wellhead fluid to leave a wet gas phase, the primary centrifugal separator comprising a riser tube with an open lower end communicating with the wellhead fluid inlet for receiving upwardly flowing wellhead fluid, the riser tube having a closed upper end, a plurality of curved-arms spaced around the riser tube for causing a majority of the oil/liquid phase to separate from the wellhead fluid to leave the wet gas phase, each curved-arm having an axially extending curved wall, curving away from the riser tube between a root edge of the curved wall at the riser tube and an outer edge of the curved wall spaced outwardly from the riser tube, at least one radial partition in the curved-arm, for dividing an inner space defined by the curved-arm into multiple levels, the primary centrifugal separator also comprising a return cylinder around the riser tube and curved-arms, for receiving oil/liquid phase moving outwardly by centrifugal force from the outer edge of the curved-arms, the return cylinder having an open lower end extending into the inventory compartment for carrying the oil/liquid phase downwardly to the inventory compartment, the return cylinder having an open upper end for passing the wet gas phase; and a secondary centrifugal separator in the vessel spaced above and axially aligned with the primary centrifugal separator by an open interstage region, the secondary centrifugal separator receiving the wet gas phase and comprising a plurality of tangential inlet vanes into which the wet gas phase passes for further separating oil/liquid from the wet gas phase to leave a dry gas phase, the secondary centrifugal separator including skimmer means defining skimmer slots above the inlet vanes for receiving the dry gas phase and for channelling the further separated oil/liquid downwardly into the secondary compartment, the further separated oil/liquid passing from the secondary compartment to the inventory compartment through the means for connecting the inventory and secondary compartments, the skimmer means having an open upper end communicating with the gas export outlet for passing the dry gas phase to the gas export outlet.
  • 2. An apparatus according to claim 1 wherein the return cylinder includes a plurality of perforations therearound, above the riser tube.
  • 3. An apparatus according to claim 2 wherein the open upper end of the return cylinder has a radially inwardly extending lip, the open upper end of the skimmer means also having a radially inwardly extending lip.
  • 4. An apparatus according to claim 3 including a lower support plate extending across the vessel between the inlet vanes and the skimmer means, the support plate defining a lower boundary of the secondary compartment, the means for connecting the inventory and secondary compartments comprising a tube opening into the support plate and extending to the inventory compartment.
  • 5. An apparatus according to claim 4 including a top plate spaced above the support plate and extending across the vessel above the skimmer means, the open upper end of the skimmer means extending through the top plate and at least one hole in the top plate for receiving any separated oil/liquid passing above the top plate, through the top plate for return to the inventory compartment.
  • 6. An apparatus according to claim 5 wherein the oil/liquid export outlet extends through a side of the vessel at a lower end of the vessel which communicates with the main oil/liquid inventory compartment.
  • 7. An apparatus according to claim 6 wherein a portion of the return cylinder which carries the perforations above the riser tube, is approximately 15-18 inches high.
  • 8. An apparatus according to claim 7 wherein a distance between an upper end of the skimmer means and a lower end of the curved-arms, is approximately 4 feet.
Parent Case Info

This is a continuation of application Ser. No. 08/337,359 filed Nov. 10, 1994 now abandoned.

US Referenced Citations (30)
Number Name Date Kind
791517 Walker Jun 1905 A
2004468 Hawley Jun 1935 A
2037426 McKeever Apr 1936 A
2256524 McKelvey Sep 1941 A
2284513 Coward May 1942 A
2533977 Van Dornick Dec 1950 A
2792075 McBride et al. Apr 1957 A
2862479 Blaser et al. Dec 1958 A
2923377 Schluderberg Feb 1960 A
3324634 Brahler et al. Jun 1967 A
3345046 Versluys et al. Oct 1967 A
3360908 Baily Jan 1968 A
3488927 Jepsen et al. Jan 1970 A
3641745 Moore Feb 1972 A
3654748 Bloom Apr 1972 A
3710556 Barratt et al. Jan 1973 A
3788282 Modrak et al. Jan 1974 A
3796026 Mugford Mar 1974 A
3961923 Zia Rouhani Jun 1976 A
4015960 Nutter Apr 1977 A
4077362 Hawkins Mar 1978 A
4238210 Ragehr et al. Dec 1980 A
4289514 Carter et al. Sep 1981 A
4349360 Schuurmans et al. Sep 1982 A
4358301 Chaix et al. Nov 1982 A
4629481 Echols Dec 1986 A
4648890 Kidwell et al. Mar 1987 A
4982794 Houot Jan 1991 A
5033915 Albrecht Jul 1991 A
5209765 Kolpak et al. May 1993 A
Foreign Referenced Citations (8)
Number Date Country
420 061 Sep 1967 CH
109 804 Nov 1974 DE
0 048 508 Mar 1985 EP
0 195 464 Apr 1989 EP
2 051 181 Oct 1970 GB
2124929 Feb 1984 GB
02203062 Oct 1988 GB
1123546 Feb 1965 NO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (16)
Entry
Prueter, Reed & Schneider, “Extended Steam/Water Testing of the Babcock & Wilcox Separation Equipment”, B&W Technical Paper presented at the Second International Steam Generator & Heat Exchanger Conference, Toronto, CANADA, Jun. 13-15, 1994. Entire paper.
Giset & Woulfe, “The Three Stroke Separation and Transportation System”, Offshore Technology Conference [OTC] Paper #7039, Copyright 1992, Offshore Technology Conference. Paper presented at the 24th Annual OTC in Houston, Texas, May 4-7, 1992, pp. 503-508.
Brekke, “The Aker Three Stroke Separation—Transportation System”, 1991 ICHEME—Subsea Separation and Transport III Conference in London, United Kingdom. Entire paper.
Edwards, W.G., “Boet Subsea Separation Development”, 1991 ICHEME—Subsea Separation and Transport III Conference in London, United Kingdom. Entire paper.
Songhurst & Edwards, “Subsea Separation: An Economic Method for Submarginal Fields,” OTC Paper #5922, Copyright 1989, Offshore Technology Conference. Paper presented at the 21th Annual OTC in Houston, Texas, May 1-4, 1989. pp. 405-416.
Baker & Entress, “The VASPS Subsea Separation and Pumping System”, Trans IChemE, vol. 70, Part A, Jan. 1992. pp. 9-16.
Entress Baker Jardine & Assocs.; Pridden, Mentor Engineering Consultants; and Baker, Baker Jardine & Assocs., “The Current State of Development of the VASPS Subsea Separation and Pumping System”, OTC PAper #6768, Copyright 1991, Offshore Technology Conference. Presented at 23rd Annual OTC in Houston, Texas, May 6-9, 1991. pp. 627-635.
Lovie, Bardex Subsea Corp.; Baugus, Oryx Energy Co.; Grecco, Unocal Corp.; and Schutter, Chevron Research & Technology Co., “Subsea Processing System Ready for Gulf of Mexico Field Conditions”. OTC Paper #7245, Copyright 1993, Offshore Technology Conference. Presented at the 25th Annual OTC in Houston, Texas, May 3-6, 1993, pp. 393-404.
Sarshar, “Subsea Separation: Technology, Equipment Available Now”, 1991 ICHEME—Subsea Separation and Transport III Conference in London, United Kingdom. Entire paper.
Queseth, Yardley & Stinessen, “A Feasible Way to Perform Subsea Separation and Gas Compression”, PD-vol. 46, Pipeline Engineering '92, ASME 1992. pp. 51-61.
Queth & Stinessen, “Kværner Booster Station Development Project—Phase 2”, ICHEME—Subsea Separation and Transport III Conference in London, United Kingdom. Entire Paper.
Beran, Brown & Root Seaflo; Hatton, Texaco, Inc.; Stires, BHP Petroleum (Americas) Inc.; and Gunderson, Exxon Production Research, “Subsea Pressure Boost/Separation—A Necessity for Deepwater Development?”. OTC Paper #7267. Presented at the 25th Annual OTC in Houston, Texas, May 3-6, 1993. Entire paper.
Shoup, Amoco Production Co. & Shoham, U. of Tulsa, “Pipeline Design for Deepwater Gulf of Mexico Developments”. OTC Paper #6411, Copyright 1990, Offshore Technology Conference. Paper presented at the 22nd Annual OTC in Houston, Texas, May 7-10, 1990, pp. 609-621.
Stinessen, Gustafson (Kvaerner Energy, Oslo, Norway) & Lunde (SINTEF, Trondheim, Norway), “Test Results from the Integration Testing of the Kvaerner Booster Station at the SINTEF Multiphase Flow Laboratory”. Presented at the 6th International Conference on Multiphase Production, BHR Group Conference Series, Pub. 4, Cannes, France, Jun 1993. pp. 415-436.
Coker, A.K.C. Technology, Sutton Coldfield, U.K., “Computer program enhances guidelines for gas-liquid separator designs”, Oil and Gas Journal, May 10, 1993. pp. 55-62.
Birmingham, D.P. & Davies, S.R. SPE 30401—“Evaluation of Compact Steam/Water Separation Equipment for Gas/Oil Systems”. ©1995, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Inc. Presented at the Offshore Europe Conference in Aberdeen, Scotland, Sep. 5-8, 1995, pp. 351-368.
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 08/337359 Nov 1994 US
Child 08/695947 US