The invention relates to the field of panel antennas, particularly those used in cellular networks.
Base transceiver stations (BTS) are subject to major constraints in terms of height arrangement (church louvers, bas-reliefs of the façades of protected buildings, etc.).
Cellular networks currently resort to isotropic high-gain antennas in order to maximise their radio range. These gains are obtained by means of panels of heights commonly varying between 1.2 m for the 1800/2100 MHz band and 2.4 m for the 900 MHz band.
A panel antenna comprises in the familiar manner a plurality of antenna elements arranged in a vertical row on a substrate.
The panel antenna in
The antenna elements Ei are supplied in a tree structure for example: the adjacent antenna elements Ei are connected two by two by means of a first supply line L1 in order to form four pairs of antenna elements.
The pairs are furthermore connected two by two by means of a second supply line L2 in order to form two quadruplets of antenna elements and the quadruplets are finally interconnected by means of a third supply line L3.
It is observed that the supply lines are defined between two access points Ai of each antenna element Ei.
a and 2b respectively illustrate a top view and a side view of an antenna element Ei arranged on a substrate 11. The antenna element Ei arranged on the substrate forms a radiating source termed a “patch”.
The dielectric substrate 11 has a dielectric constant ∈1 and is arranged on a ground plane P, wherein the antenna element Ei is arranged on the substrate 11.
The antenna element Ei is arranged on the dielectric substrate 11 connected to a connector Ai in order to supply the antenna element Ei.
Each antenna element Ei displays during operation a unit gain of approx. 8 dBi; the antenna in
The tables in
It can therefore be seen that the height of the antenna is dictated by the number of antenna elements Ei. Hence, the greater the gain of the antenna, the more elements are required and the larger the size of the antenna.
This is not unproblematic, since the current trend involves imposing maximum heights for panel antennas or indeed reductions in height.
A solution is known for reducing the size of a panel antenna, involving eliminating some antenna elements Ei. Such elimination however results in a loss in terms of antenna gain and therefore deterioration in the antenna performances.
One aim of the invention is to enable an increase in the gain of an antenna without having to increase the size of the antenna.
Another aim of the invention is to enable a reduction in the height of an antenna without any decrease in the gain of the antenna.
Hence, the invention relates to a panel antenna comprising a ground plane, a dielectric substrate, having a permittivity, wherein the substrate is arranged on the ground plane, at least one radiating source, wherein each radiating source is formed of a plurality of antenna elements, wherein the antenna elements are arranged on the substrate and are furthermore consecutively spaced apart in relation to one another at a distance of less than a wavelength λ, said wavelength λ corresponding to the antenna operating frequency.
The antenna according to the invention is characterised in that it furthermore comprises a dielectric superstrate, having a permittivity greater than the permittivity of the substrate, wherein the superstrate is arranged above the antenna elements and the antenna elements are all identical and possess during operation identical radiating characteristics.
The arrangement of the antenna elements forming each radiating source makes it possible to achieve a reduction in height with constant gain or obtain an increase in the gain with constant height.
Preferably, the antenna furthermore comprises a dielectric superstrate, having a permittivity greater than the permittivity of the substrate, wherein the superstrate is arranged on the antenna elements.
The combination of the superstrate with the arrangement of the antenna elements makes it possible to achieve either the reduction in height with constant gain or an increase in the gain with constant height.
The invention is advantageously supplemented by the following characteristics, considered alone or in any of their technically feasible combinations:
The invention also relates to a cellular communication network comprising a panel antenna according to the invention.
a and 2b respectively illustrate a top view and a side view of an antenna element;
a and 3b respectively illustrate the ratio between the gain of the antenna and its height for two main frequency bands;
a and 6b respectively illustrate a top view and a side view of an antenna element of the antenna according to the invention;
In all the figures, similar elements bear identical numerical references.
Two embodiments of the invention are described below in relation to
“Antenna element” is taken to mean a radiating element having a preferably flat conducting body.
“Radiating source” is taken to mean the combination of several antenna elements.
“Panel antenna” is taken to mean a planar antenna comprising several antenna elements.
For each embodiment, the panel antenna comprises a dielectric substrate 11 having a permittivity ∈1, wherein the substrate 11 is arranged on a ground plan P. Furthermore, the panel antenna comprises at least one radiating source Si.
Each radiating source Si is formed of a plurality of antenna elements Eij consecutively spaced apart in relation to one another. Two consecutive antenna elements are spaced apart by a distance de less than the wavelength λ, said wavelength λ corresponding to the antenna operating frequency.
The antenna in
Advantageously, each radiating source Si comprises four antenna elements Ei1, Ei2, Ei3, Ei4 connected in pairs in a tree structure for example by means of a first supply line L1.
Each antenna element comprises an access point Aij for connection of the antenna elements in pairs by means of the supply line L1.
The pairs of antenna elements Eij are connected by means of a second supply line L2. The centre of the second supply line L2 comprises an access point Ai of the radiating source Si. Such an access point Ai is adapted for supply of the radiating source Si to which it refers.
As can be seen, there are as many access points Ai as there are radiating sources Si. Hence, the antenna in
The radiating sources Si are arranged in relation to each other such that their access points Ai are spaced apart by a distance equal to the distance ds between two consecutive access points of two radiating sources Si.
Furthermore, the antenna elements Eij of a radiating source Si are arranged in relation to one another with a distance de equal to ds(N−1)/N, wherein ds is the distance between the radiating sources Si and N is the number of antenna elements Eij of each radiating source Si. The distance de is in turn the distance between two consecutive access points Aij of each antenna element Eij.
To be more precise, in defining a main axis passing through the centres of symmetry of each antenna element, the access points Aij of each antenna element are located on an axis perpendicular to the main axis, the first and second supply lines L1, L2 being parallel to the main axis.
Preferably, each radiating source Si comprises four radiating elements Eij.
The antenna furthermore comprises (those of
In relation to an antenna element Ei forming a radiating source of the patch type, of known type, the antenna element Eij is thus immersed in a medium with high permittivity, which allows a reduction in the size of the antenna element in order to reduce its operating wavelength, or rather retain it and reduce its physical dimensions.
Use of the substrate 12 makes it possible to retain radiating characteristics identical to those of an antenna element of greater height.
Furthermore, a resistance R is connected between the ground plane P and each antenna element Eij (refer to
This resistance R also allows an appreciable increase in the passband of the antenna in its resonant behaviour.
Finally, the permittivity ∈1 is for example between 1 and 4 and is preferably equal to 2.2 and the permittivity ∈2 is for example between 10 and 50 and is preferably equal to 30.
By way of example, in relation to the antenna element Ei of a patch of known type, for an operating frequency in the GSM band at a central frequency of 920 MHz, the side of the antenna element Ei is of dimensions equal to 94 mm whereas the side of the antenna element Eij (with the superstrate) is of dimensions equal to 21.5 mm.
Still by way of example, one may consider antenna elements Eij which are square, in the shape of an equilateral triangle or elliptical in shape or derived from the following technologies: horns or wire antennas allowing combination of sources owing to their small size or small radiating aperture.
Reduction in Height—Constant Gain
The antenna illustrated in
It comprises two radiating sources S1, S2 spaced apart by a distance ds=0.9λ, each consisting of four antenna elements spaced apart by a distance de=0.9λ (4−1)/4=0.675λ (refer to
Each radiating source displays a gain of 14 dBi during operation such that the antenna in
Nevertheless, in relation to the antenna as illustrated in
The radiating sources S1 and S2, each having an access point A1, A2, are nested along the longitudinal axis of the antenna (refer to
The distance between two consecutive radiating elements belonging to two different radiating sources varies between ds/N and ds(N−1)/N, i.e. between 0.225λ and 0.675λ.
Increase in Gain—Constant Height
The antenna illustrated in
It comprises six radiating sources, each consisting of four antenna elements (refer to
As in the preceding embodiment, each radiating source displays a gain of 14 dBi during operation such that the antenna in
As above, the radiating sources, each having an access point A1, A2, A3, A4, A5, A6, are nested along the longitudinal axis of the antenna (refer to
The distance between two consecutive radiating elements belonging to two different radiating sources varies between ds/N and ds(N−1)/N, i.e. between 0.225λ and 0.675λ.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 57864 | Sep 2010 | FR | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2011/067026 | 9/29/2011 | WO | 00 | 3/15/2013 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2012/041979 | 4/5/2012 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6999030 | Mateychuk | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7591792 | Bouton | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7626547 | Schillmeier et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
20020084945 | Huebner | Jul 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2945380 | Nov 2010 | FR |
WO 9827614 | Jun 1998 | WO |
WO 9917403 | Apr 1999 | WO |
WO 0106595 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO 03009752 | Feb 2003 | WO |
WO 2007126831 | Nov 2007 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130176188 A1 | Jul 2013 | US |