The present invention relates in general to a log splitter. More particularly, the present invention relates to a compact log splitter having a splitting wedge coupled to a beam, where the beam has a drive mechanism disposed therein.
Log splitting devices have been in use for decades. Conventional log splitters typically include a stationary support frame configured to support a hydraulic cylinder and a cooperating splitting wedge. Generally speaking, splitting of wood occurs by causing the splitting wedge to be forced through the wood, using the force of the hydraulic cylinder. In a fixed wedge version, the splitting wedge is fixed to the supporting frame, and the log is forced into the splitting wedge. In use, a log is placed in the appropriate position and is forcibly pushed against the stationary splitting wedge by the force created when the hydraulic cylinder is extended. Obviously, this requires movement or sliding of the log in order to create the desired split. This required movement necessarily requires that this type of splitter be positioned in a horizontal manner to allow space for the log to move past the wedge. In an alternative version, the splitting wedge is attached to the hydraulic cylinder, which is typically attached to the support frame. In this type of design, the log is held in place by some type of stop, thus allowing the force of the hydraulic cylinder to force the splitting wedge through the log.
As those skilled in the art will appreciate, large amounts of hydraulic force make it easier to split logs with a log splitter. This is true in both fixed and movable splitting wedge designs. However, as the amount of hydraulic force supplied by the hydraulic cylinder increases, so does the required strength of the log splitter components. For example, large amounts of hydraulic force require that the support frame, splitting wedge, and stop member be constructed with sufficient strength to counteract the hydraulic force without breaking or otherwise becoming deformed.
Log splitters may also be broken into two categories based upon their orientation during operation—horizontal splitters and vertical splitters. Generally speaking, horizontal splitters require logs to be positioned horizontal and roughly parallel to the surface on which the log splitting device is set. Horizontal splitters work well for smaller, lighter logs. However, horizontal splitters can be inconvenient to use when splitting large, heavy pieces of wood. Operators must lift heavy and irregular shaped logs in order to position them in horizontal splitters. This creates safety hazards to operators as well as inefficiencies in the splitting process. All fixed wedge splitters are required to operate in the horizontal orientation, to allow space for the log to exit past the wedge itself.
Current horizontal-type log splitter designs are often large and bulky, making them difficult to both transport and store when not in use. The configuration of the log splitters themselves has traditionally dictated size requirements. In both the fixed wedge and movable wedge versions, a predetermined “splitting zone” is required to have a certain length. Naturally, the cylinder must be positioned to accommodate travel through the splitting zone. The length of the splitting zone and the length of the cylinder, when added together, require the splitter to be quite long, thus being difficult to handle. In addition, post-manufacture shipment of these log splitters to retail locations and the like is inconvenient and expensive due to their size and shape. For example, most current horizontal-type log splitters are too large to be shipped on a standard size pallet. Thus, compact log splitters that are sized to fit on a standard pallet during shipping would be highly desirable.
As mentioned above, one common design element that has made these log splitters large and bulky is the coupling of the splitting wedge or pusher in series with a hydraulic cylinder. As a result, the log splitter must be designed with a support structure having a longitudinal length that is sufficient to account for both the longitudinal length of the hydraulic cylinder used to drive the splitting wedge or pusher, as well as the longitudinal length of travel of the splitting wedge (i.e., the length of the “splitting zone”). Due to strength requirements, this support structure is continuous (e.g., a single continuous I-Beam support). Thus, while this type of design is efficient in that movement of the hydraulic piston within the cylinder transmits directly to the splitting wedge because of their positioning in series with one another and in substantially the same horizontal plane, the overall size of the log splitter is greatly increased.
Based on the foregoing, there exists a need for a compact log splitter that is compact in size to enable the log splitter to be easily shipped, transported and stored when not in use. In addition, there is a need for a compact log splitter capable of splitting logs similar in size to those that may be split using much larger log splitters.
The present invention solves the foregoing problems by providing a log splitter comprising a support structure having a first end, a second end, and an open center portion defined therebetweeen, a splitting device slidably coupled to the support structure, and a drive mechanism for driving movement of the splitting device through a splitting zone. The splitting device comprises an elongate beam having an outer surface, a first end, a second end, and an open center portion between the first end and the second end, and a splitting wedge coupled to the outer surface of the elongate beam and having at least one splitting surface formed thereon. The elongate beam is disposed within the open center portion of the support structure. The drive mechanism is disposed within the open center portion of the elongate beam, and is coupled on a first end to the first end of the support structure and on a second end to the second end of the elongate beam.
Due to the nested structure of the splitting device, the size of the splitter is minimized because the support structure does not have to be designed with a longitudinal length that is sufficient to account for both the longitudinal length of the drive mechanism and the longitudinal length of travel of the splitting wedge.
Drive system 16 includes pump and motor assembly 28, control handle 30, a control valve (not shown), and a hydraulic cylinder or drive mechanism (not shown). Pump and motor assembly 28 of drive system 16 is coupled to wheel base 14, while the drive mechanism may be coupled to support framework 12 as will be discussed in more detail to follow. The drive mechanism of drive system 16 is designed to drive splitting wedge 18 between first stop member 20 and second stop member 22 in order to split logs as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art. Control handle 30 is operably coupled to both pump and motor assembly 28 and the drive mechanism, and is structured to control movement of splitting wedge 18 via the drive mechanism. In particular, movement of control handle 30 causes corresponding adjustments in the control valve, which controls the flow of fluid into and out of the drive mechanism.
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
First attachment means 72 includes a pair of plates 82 defining a slot 84 therebetween, and a pin member 85 structured for insertion between the pair of plates 82. Similarly, second attachment means 76 includes a pair of plates 86 defining a slot 88 therebetween, and a pin member 89 structured for insertion between the pair of plates 86.
When support structure 12, splitting device 17, and drive mechanism 66 are assembled as shown in
Although drive system 16 is described herein as including pump and motor assembly 28 and drive mechanism 66 comprising a cylinder housing 68 operably coupled to an extendable member 70, workers skilled in the art will appreciate that any type of drive mechanism may be used provided that it is capable of driving splitting wedge 18 horizontally through a log. Examples of alternative drive mechanisms include, but are not limited to, wheel drive mechanisms, screw or worm drives, and the like.
After positioning drive mechanism 66 within open center portion 64 of elongate beam 62, second attachment means 76 at second end 78 of drive mechanism 66 may be coupled to splitting device mount 92. In particular, splitting device mount 92 may be inserted into slot 88 formed between the pair of plates 86 of second attachment means 76. Pin member 89 may then be inserted through pin receiving aperture 94 in splitting device mount 92 in order to fixedly couple drive mechanism 66 to elongate beam 62. Once coupled together, drive mechanism 66 may control longitudinal movement of elongate beam 62 of splitting device 17, and thus, movement of splitting wedge 18 through splitting zone 42.
As shown in
Although first and second attachment means 72 and 76 have previously been described as utilizing a pin to secure the attachment means to respective mount members, workers skilled in the art will appreciate that any suitable fastening means may be used. Thus, pin members are shown merely for purposes of example and not for limitation.
In embodiments of the present invention wherein splitting wedge 18 is a dual sided splitting wedge, an operator may split a second log when driving splitting wedge 18 from the extended position shown in
The longitudinal length of movement of extendable member 70 between the retracted wedge position and extended wedge position is defined as the stroke length. The stroke length may be, for example, between 16 inches and 24 inches. However, workers skilled in the art will appreciate that the required stroke length will be selected based upon the desired length of splitting zone 42.
As shown in
Designing log splitter 10 with drive mechanism 66 nested within elongate beam 62 and elongate beam 62 extendable through opening 100 in top portion 50 of support structure 12 during the log splitting process provides numerous advantages. One advantage of nesting drive mechanism 66 within elongate beam 62 is reducing the required longitudinal length of support structure 12. In conventional log splitter designs, the drive mechanism and splitting wedge were positioned in series and in substantially the same horizontal plane. Thus, the support structure had to be of sufficient length to account for both the length of the drive mechanism as well as the length of travel of the splitting wedge. By nesting the drive mechanism within an elongate beam member coupled to a splitting wedge, the drive mechanism and splitting wedge are now parallel to one another rather than in series with one another, thereby greatly reducing the required longitudinal length of the support structure of the log splitter. Another advantage of log splitter 10 that helps to reduce the required longitudinal length of support structure 12 is the opening 100 in second end 54 of top portion 50. Opening 100 in top portion 50 of support structure 12 allows elongate beam 62 to extend therethrough while driving splitting wedge 18 through splitting zone 42 between first stop member 20 and second stop member 22. As a result, the length of support structure 12 may be minimized because it is not necessary for support structure 12 to “house” the elongate beam during the entire log splitting process. Numerous other advantages may be realized by the design of log splitter 10 as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art.
Although log splitter 10A may be structured for mounting to numerous types of vehicles or heavy machinery, the log splitter may be particularly suited for attachment to a tractor. Tractors typically include a three point hitch, which is mounted to the back end of the tractor near the rear wheels. A three point hitch generally includes a pair of hitch lifting arms, which may be coupled to the hydraulic system of the tractor, and a center arm known as a top link. In order to mount log splitter 10A to the three point hitch, first stud 122 of first lower hitch plate 120 is inserted into an aperture in the first hitch lifting arm, second stud 128 of second lower hitch plate 126 is inserted into an aperture in the second hitch lifting arm, and the top link is positioned within slot 116 between the pair of mast mounting plates 114 and secured therein with pin member 130. Workers skilled in the art will appreciate that three point mounting system 108 represents only one example of a three point mounting system in accordance with the present invention. Thus, various modifications of three point mounting system 108 are contemplated and within the intended scope of the present invention.
Similar to log splitter 10, log splitter 10A also includes a control handle 30 and control valve (not shown) structured to control movement of splitting wedge 18. In particular, control handle 30 and the control valve may be operably coupled to the hydraulic system of the tractor such that movement of control handle 30 causes corresponding adjustments in the control valve, which controls the flow of fluid (from the hydraulic system of the tractor) into and out of the drive mechanism.
Although the embodiments described above focused on a log splitter having a hydraulically driven splitting wedge, those skilled in the art will appreciate that fixed wedge embodiments are also possible and within the intended scope of the present invention. In fixed wedge embodiments, the splitting wedge may be fixed to the support frame, such as support structure 12. A “stop member” or similar device having a log engaging surface may then replace the splitting wedge coupled to an elongate beam, and the stop member may be driven toward the splitting wedge by a drive mechanism such as the one previously described. Thus, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the inventive log splitter described herein may be adapted for use with both stationary and non-stationary splitting wedges.
Although the present invention has been described with reference to preferred embodiments, workers skilled in the art will recognize that changes may be made in form and detail without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3319675 | Bles, Sr. | May 1967 | A |
4103724 | Braid | Aug 1978 | A |
4258765 | Suomi | Mar 1981 | A |
4351377 | Hamel | Sep 1982 | A |
4366848 | Gavinski | Jan 1983 | A |
4378038 | Doiron et al. | Mar 1983 | A |
4470441 | Wirsbinski et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
4498293 | Gregory | Feb 1985 | A |
4522241 | West | Jun 1985 | A |
4679607 | Bradley | Jul 1987 | A |
4782870 | Duerr | Nov 1988 | A |
5526855 | Graham | Jun 1996 | A |
6076576 | Maddox et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
7255143 | Babcock et al. | Aug 2007 | B1 |
20050284540 | Walker et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060144468 | Lewis et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070000975 | Paradise | Jan 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090229709 A1 | Sep 2009 | US |