Portable communication devices, such as cellular telephones, typically are required to operate over a number of different communication bands. These so called “multi-band” communication devices use one or more instances of transmit and receive circuitry to generate and amplify the transmit and receive signals. However, these communication devices usually employ a single antenna to transmit and receive the signals over the various communication bands.
The antenna in such communication devices is typically connected to the transmit and receive circuitry through switching circuitry, such as a duplexer or a diplexer, or through an isolated switch element, sometimes referred to as a “transmit/receive switch” or an “antenna switch.” The switching circuitry or the isolated switch element must effectively isolate the transmit signal from the receive signal. Isolating the transmit signal from the receive signal becomes more problematic in a multiple band communications device where the transmit frequency of one communication band might overlap with the receive frequency of a different communication band.
The antenna switch 16 isolates the transmit signal from the receive signal. When implementing a 2G or 3G transceiver, linearity and physical size of the antenna switch are significant design factors. Linearity is usually defined by what is referred to as a third order intermodulation product, referred to as IMD3. As shown in
The largest factor in IMD performance of the antenna switch 18 is the nonlinear capacitance of the off branches of the switch. As shown in
Therefore, it would be desirable to have an antenna switch that provides high linearity and low loss in a small area.
Embodiments of the invention include a switch element, including a switch device having a drain, a source and a plurality of gates, and at least one additional interconnect located between the plurality of gates, the additional interconnect operative to establish a constant potential between the at least two gates.
Other embodiments are also provided. Other systems, methods, features, and advantages of the invention will be or become apparent to one with skill in the art upon examination of the following figures and detailed description. It is intended that all such additional systems, methods, features, and advantages be included within this description, be within the scope of the invention, and be protected by the accompanying claims.
The invention can be better understood with reference to the following figures. The components within the figures are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead being placed upon clearly illustrating the principles of the invention. Moreover, in the figures, like reference numerals designate corresponding parts throughout the different views.
Although described with particular reference to a portable transceiver, the compact low loss high frequency switch with improved linearity performance (also referred to herein as the “compact low loss switch”) can be implemented in any transceiver device where the combination of a transmit signal and a blocking signal may overlap a receive band and in which the combined signal may impair receiver performance.
The compact low loss switch is generally implemented in hardware. However, one or more of the signals that control the compact low loss switch can be implemented in software, or a combination of hardware and software. When implemented in hardware, the compact low loss switch can be implemented using specialized hardware elements. When one or more of the control signals for the compact low loss switch are generated at least partially in software, the software portion can be used to precisely control the operating aspects of various components in compact low loss switch. The software can be stored in a memory and executed by a suitable instruction execution system (microprocessor). The hardware implementation of the compact low loss switch can include any or a combination of the following technologies, which are all well known in the art: discrete electronic components, a discrete logic circuit(s) having logic gates for implementing logic functions upon data signals, an application specific integrated circuit having appropriate logic gates, a programmable gate array(s) (PGA), a field programmable gate array (FPGA), a separate, specially designed integrated circuit for biasing purposes, etc.
The software for the compact low loss switch comprises an ordered listing of executable instructions for implementing logical functions, and can be embodied in any computer-readable medium for use by or in connection with an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device, such as a computer-based system, processor-containing system, or other system that can fetch the instructions from the instruction execution system, apparatus, or device and execute the instructions.
The receive filter 122 delivers the receive signal via connection 127 to a low noise amplifier 128. The output of the low noise amplifier 128 is supplied via connection 129 to a receiver 134. The transmitter 131 and the receiver 134 are shown for illustrative purposes only. Various configurations and implementation of a transmitter and receiver are known to those having ordinary skill in the art and all such implementations are contemplated herein. The transceiver 100 also comprises baseband processing circuitry 132 coupled to the transmitter 131 via connection 136 and coupled to the receiver 134 via connection 137. The baseband processing circuitry performs baseband signal processing for the transmit signal and for the receive signal as known in the art. If one or more portions or aspects of the compact low loss switch 200 are implemented in software, then the baseband processing circuitry includes the compact low loss switch software 155.
The baseband processing circuitry 132 is coupled to an input/output element 141 via connection 138. In an example in which the transceiver 100 is part of a portable communications device, such as a cellular-type telephone, the input/output element 141 comprises a microphone, speaker, keyboard, pointing device, or other interface elements.
An exemplary layout of a compact low loss switch having a three gate structure is shown diagrammatically in
In accordance with an embodiment, multigate devices are formed with the gate connections formed as Schottky contacts to contact the resistance Rlin associated with each device. This reduces the gate to gate pitch when compared to drain/source ohmic contacts, and thus the physical size of the gate connections is significantly reduced when compared to ohmic contacts.
In the example shown in
Another aspect of the invention is that three-gate structures are used as a starting point to make additional multi-gate devices. For example, using the above-described three-gate devices, other devices having additional gates can be formed by connecting the internal gates of such devices to the resistance Rlin to realize source-gate, drain-gate and triple-gate structures.
The structures of
All like metal layers are fabricated during the same step. All ohmic contacts are fabricated at the same mask level, and all Schottky gate contacts are fabricated during the same masking process. Further, the steps in blocks 502 and 504 can be integrated so that they are made concurrently in the same series of manufacturing operations.
While various embodiments of the invention have been described, it will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that many more embodiments and implementations are possible that are within the scope of this invention.
This application is a continuation of co-pending U.S. utility application entitled “COMPACT LOW LOSS HIGH FREQUENCY SWITCH WITH IMPROVED LINEARITY PERFORMANCE,” having Ser. No. 11/935,690, filed on Nov. 6, 2007, and which is entirely incorporated herein by reference, which claims priority to U.S. provisional application entitled, “COMPACT LOW LOSS HIGH FREQUENCY SWITCH WITH IMPROVED LINEARITY PERFORMANCE,” having Ser. No. 60/858,228, filed on Nov. 10, 2006, and which is entirely incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3725748 | Atkins | Apr 1973 | A |
5001668 | Ito et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5347601 | Ade et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5648757 | Vernace et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5659258 | Tanabe et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5796286 | Otaka | Aug 1998 | A |
6528951 | Yamazaki et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6618308 | Blodgett | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6642578 | Arnold et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6720850 | Sasabata et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6996376 | Clifton | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7176046 | Taylor | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7274222 | Alacoque et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7335914 | Shibusawa | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7420402 | Washio et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7489777 | Yamazaki et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7505790 | Chang et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7515882 | Kelcourse et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7719141 | McMorrow | May 2010 | B2 |
20020124385 | Tsai et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020196098 | Sasabata et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20040141470 | Kelcourse et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20060138420 | Shibusawa | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060290692 | Kimura et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20080043384 | Chu | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080079653 | Ahn et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080129642 | Ahn et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20090022001 | Morishita et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090073078 | Ahn et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090261382 | O'Keefe et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100109796 | Park et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2005-006143 | Jan 2005 | JP |
2005-268895 | Sep 2005 | JP |
2005268895 | Sep 2005 | JP |
2006-310509 | Nov 2006 | JP |
2006-310510 | Nov 2006 | JP |
2006-310511 | Nov 2006 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110151776 A1 | Jun 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60858228 | Nov 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11935690 | Nov 2007 | US |
Child | 12980759 | US |