The present disclosure relates generally to a compact, multi-port, multiple-input and multiple-output (MIMO) antenna with high port isolation and low pattern correlation and to a method of making such an antenna.
As the use of smart phones, cellular telephones, and personal digital assistants, and like mobile devices in wireless communication systems continues to dramatically grow, a need exists to provide increased system performance. One technique for improving such system performance is to provide uncorrelated propagation paths using multiple-input and multiple-output (MIMO) smart antenna technology. MIMO uses multiple transmitting antennas, which are typically spatially arranged apart, at a transmitter for simultaneously transmitting spatially multiplexed signals along multiple propagation paths; and multiple receiving antennas, which are also typically spatially arranged apart, at a receiver to demultiplex the spatially multiplexed signals. MIMO technology offers significant increases in data throughput and system range without additional bandwidth or increased transceiver power by spreading the same total power over the multiple antennas. MIMO is an important part of modern wireless communication standards, such as at least one version of IEEE 802.11 (Wi-Fi), 4G, 3GPP Long Term Evolution (LTE), WiMax and HSPA+.
However, the use of multiple antennas results in an unfavorable trade-off between device size and system performance. Effective MIMO performance requires relatively high port isolation and low pattern correlation. This is typically accomplished by increasing the distance between the antennas, thereby resulting in larger devices, which are undesirable in many applications, such as handheld mobile devices or Wi-Fi access points. Although decreasing the distance between the antennas results in a desirably smaller device, it is typically obtained at the expense of higher pattern correlation, lower port isolation, and poorer performance caused by mutual coupling. Mutual coupling between the antennas typically results in wasted transmit power during transmission, and a lower received power from incoming signals during reception.
Accordingly, there is a need for a compact, multi-port, MIMO antenna with the characteristics of high port isolation and low pattern correlation for enhanced performance, as well as to a method of making such an antenna.
The accompanying figures, where like reference numerals refer to identical or functionally similar elements throughout the separate views, together with the detailed description below, are incorporated in and form part of the specification, and serve to further illustrate embodiments of concepts that include the claimed invention, and explain various principles and advantages of those embodiments.
Skilled artisans will appreciate that elements in the figures are illustrated for simplicity and clarity and have not necessarily been drawn to scale. For example, the dimensions and locations of some of the elements in the figures may be exaggerated relative to other elements to help to improve understanding of embodiments of the present invention.
The method and structural components have been represented where appropriate by conventional symbols in the drawings, showing only those specific details that are pertinent to understanding the embodiments of the present invention so as not to obscure the disclosure with details that will be readily apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art having the benefit of the description herein.
One aspect of this disclosure relates to an antenna that includes a ground support, e.g., a ground plane; an electrically conductive, endless element, e.g., a circular element, mounted at a distance relative to the ground support; and a trio of ports arranged, preferably circumferentially, along the endless element for conveying radio frequency signals in an operating band of frequencies. The ports are successively spaced apart, preferably at equal electrical distances, along the endless element by a spacing of one-half of a wavelength at a center frequency of the operating band.
The wavelength referenced herein is the guided wavelength relative to an open transmission line formed, between the ports, by the endless element and the ground support. More particularly, this guided wavelength is such that a signal applied at one port undergoes a phase inversion to arrive at another port through the shortest connecting path therebetween along the endless element. Preferably, the endless element has a symmetrical shape about each port. For instance, each port could be located at a respective corner of an equilateral triangularly-shaped element, or at every other corner of an equilateral hexagonally-shaped element. Correspondingly, the trio of ports is arranged preferably equiangularly.
Also, preferably, the above-mentioned open transmission line formed between the ground support and the endless element features constant characteristic impedance. When this condition is met, a radio frequency signal fed at any one port will split approximately equally in opposite directions along the endless element. This signal split is exactly equal if the input impedance seen on either side of each port is the same. One split signal will arrive at an adjacent port a half wavelength away (180 degrees phase shift) along the shorter connecting path, while the other split signal will arrive at the same adjacent port a full wavelength away (360 degrees phase shift) along the longer connecting path. The split signals are thus in opposite phase at the same adjacent port. Thus, there is a high (near ideal) port isolation between the ports, and a corresponding low pattern correlation between the respective radiated electromagnetic field patterns, since it is well known that, for lossless antennas, coupling between the ports corresponds to pattern correlation, and the same is approximately true for low-loss antennas. Antennas are typically designed to have low ohmic losses, and thus a high efficiency in order to maximize communication range and data throughput rate.
Low pattern correlation yields a high data throughput in MIMO communication systems. Other known means may be used that can concurrently achieve phase inversion and approximately equal amplitude when transmitting between any pair of ports of a three-port antenna structure, to thereby produce high port isolation and low pattern correlation. For instance, it may be possible to load sections of the endless element with distributed or lumped resistive and reactive components in order to obtain the so desired phase and amplitude relationships. In this case, the endless element may be mechanically discontinuous if series elements, e.g., capacitors, are placed along its contour in order to achieve said phase relationships.
In a preferred embodiment, the ground support has an outer contoured support surface, e.g., flat or curved, and the endless element has an outer antenna surface of complementary contour, i.e., also flat or curved, relative to the contoured support surface. At any given point along the endless element, the outer antenna surface has preferably a constant dimension, e.g., width, if the endless element is formed by a strip-like structure, in the direction orthogonal to the direction along which the endless element develops, as well as the direction crossing said point and orthogonal to the ground support, and is preferably maintained at a constant distance from the outer contoured support surface.
In this way, the characteristic impedance of the transmission line formed by the endless element and the ground support is maintained essentially constant, thus substantially facilitating the energy flow and the determination of the distance between the ports, because the guided wavelength is essentially constant. For instance, the distance between the endless element and the ground support can be selected and adjusted to yield a 50 ohm impedance match at each port, as it happens, for instance, if the input impedance seen on either side of each port along the endless element is 100 ohms Advantageously, the endless element radiates radio frequency waves in an operating band of frequencies, e.g., 2.40 GHz to 2.48 GHz, and also radiates radio frequency waves in an additional operating band of higher frequencies, e.g., 5 GHz to 6 GHz, thereby allowing a wireless device to operate across the most common Wi-Fi frequency bands world-wide.
A method of making an antenna, in accordance with another aspect of this disclosure, is performed by mounting an electrically conductive, endless element at a distance relative to a ground support; arranging a trio of ports along the endless element for conveying radio frequency signals in an operating band of frequencies; and successively spacing the ports apart along the endless element by a spacing of one-half of a guided wavelength at a center frequency of the operating band.
Turning now to
As shown in
In a preferred embodiment, the ground plane 12 has an outer contoured support surface, and the circular element 14 has an outer antenna surface of complementary contour to the contoured support surface. As shown in the embodiment of
In an exemplary embodiment, the circular element 14 is constituted of a metal, such as steel, preferably with a gold or nickel plating. When operative at the operating band of frequencies, e.g., 2.40 GHz to 2.48 GHz, the circular element 14 has a width of about 1-5 mm, preferably about 2-3 mm, and is maintained at the distance of about 17 mm relative to the ground plane 12 to obtain approximately the desired 50 ohm impedance match. The aforementioned spacing of one-half of a guided wavelength between adjacent ports, along the circular element 14, is about 57.5 mm.
In use as a transmitting antenna, a plurality of radio frequency sources together with antenna matching circuits (not illustrated), preferably one matching circuit for each port, are mounted at the opposite side of the ground plane 12, preferably between the microstrip line 30 and the center conductor 24. Each source generates a radio frequency signal that is conducted along the respective microstrip line 30 to the respective center conductor 24, through a matching circuit, if needed, and to the circular element 14. Thus, each radio frequency signal is fed to each port, preferably simultaneously, and is radiated from the entire circular element 14. The three ports, so decoupled, serve as three independent channels. The radio frequency signal emitted at any one port, e.g., port 16, will split equally in opposite circumferential directions along the circular element 14. One split signal will arrive at an adjacent port, e.g., port 18, a half wavelength away (180 degrees out of phase), while the other split signal will arrive at the same adjacent port 18 a full wavelength away (360 degrees; thus, in phase). The same analysis is valid for any other pair of neighboring ports. The split signals thus feature opposite phases, and cancel each other out, at the same adjacent port 18. Due to symmetry, all three ports have the same properties.
Thus, there is a high (near ideal) port isolation between the ports 16, 18, across the aforementioned narrow fractional operating band, and a corresponding low pattern correlation between the radiated electromagnetic patterns, provided that the ohmic losses of the antenna are moderate. This yields a high data throughput and an enhanced antenna performance in MIMO wireless communication systems, for instance, Wi-Fi devices operating under at least one version of the IEEE 802.11 standard. Advantageously, the circular element 14 is a dual-band antenna and radiates radio frequency waves not only in the aforementioned operating band of frequencies, e.g., 2.40 GHz to 2.48 GHz, but also efficiently radiates radio frequency waves in an additional operating band of higher frequencies, e.g., 5 GHz to 6 GHz, thereby making the antenna especially desirable for use in dual-band, wireless, Wi-Fi routers.
In the embodiment of
The embodiment of
Furthermore, other embodiments of the adjustment element 34 may include the case where the adjustment element 34 is suspended between the ground support 12 and the circular element 14. For instance, the adjustment element 34 may be galvanically connected to the conductive shield 26 of each port and be supported mechanically by each conductive shield 26 at some distance from the ground support 12, and at another distance from the circular element 14.
The ground support 12 need not lie in a plane, but, as illustrated in the embodiments of
In the foregoing specification, specific embodiments have been described. However, one of ordinary skill in the art appreciates that various modifications and changes can be made without departing from the scope of the invention as set forth in the claims below. Accordingly, the specification and figures are to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense, and all such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of present teachings.
The benefits, advantages, solutions to problems, and any element(s) that may cause any benefit, advantage, or solution to occur or become more pronounced are not to be construed as a critical, required, or essential features or elements of any or all the claims. The invention is defined solely by the appended claims including any amendments made during the pendency of this application and all equivalents of those claims as issued.
Moreover in this document, relational terms such as first and second, top and bottom, and the like may be used solely to distinguish one entity or action from another entity or action without necessarily requiring or implying any actual such relationship or order between such entities or actions. The terms “comprises,” “comprising,” “has,” “having,” “includes,” “including,” “contains,” “containing,” or any other variation thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion, such that a process, method, article, or apparatus that comprises, has, includes, contains a list of elements does not include only those elements, but may include other elements not expressly listed or inherent to such process, method, article, or apparatus. An element proceeded by “comprises . . . a,” “has . . . a,” “includes . . . a,” or “contains . . . a,” does not, without more constraints, preclude the existence of additional identical elements in the process, method, article, or apparatus that comprises, has, includes, or contains the element. The terms “a” and “an” are defined as one or more unless explicitly stated otherwise herein. The terms “substantially,” “essentially,” “approximately,” “about,” or any other version thereof, are defined as being close to as understood by one of ordinary skill in the art, and in one non-limiting embodiment the term is defined to be within 10%, in another embodiment within 5%, in another embodiment within 1%, and in another embodiment within 0.5%. The term “coupled” as used herein is defined as connected, although not necessarily directly and not necessarily mechanically. A device or structure that is “configured” in a certain way is configured in at least that way, but may also be configured in ways that are not listed.
It will be appreciated that some embodiments may be comprised of one or more generic or specialized processors (or “processing devices”) such as microprocessors, digital signal processors, customized processors, and field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), and unique stored program instructions (including both software and firmware) that control the one or more processors to implement, in conjunction with certain non-processor circuits, some, most, or all of the functions of the method and/or apparatus described herein. Alternatively, some or all functions could be implemented by a state machine that has no stored program instructions, or in one or more application specific integrated circuits (ASICs), in which each function or some combinations of certain of the functions are implemented as custom logic. Of course, a combination of the two approaches could be used.
Moreover, an embodiment can be implemented as a computer-readable storage medium having computer readable code stored thereon for programming a computer (e.g., comprising a processor) to perform a method as described and claimed herein. Examples of such computer-readable storage mediums include, but are not limited to, a hard disk, a CD-ROM, an optical storage device, a magnetic storage device, a ROM (Read Only Memory), a PROM (Programmable Read Only Memory), an EPROM (Erasable Programmable Read Only Memory), an EEPROM (Electrically Erasable Programmable Read Only Memory) and a Flash memory. Further, it is expected that one of ordinary skill, notwithstanding possibly significant effort and many design choices motivated by, for example, available time, current technology, and economic considerations, when guided by the concepts and principles disclosed herein, will be readily capable of generating such software instructions and programs and ICs with minimal experimentation.
The Abstract of the Disclosure is provided to allow the reader to quickly ascertain the nature of the technical disclosure. It is submitted with the understanding that it will not be used to interpret or limit the scope or meaning of the claims. In addition, in the foregoing Detailed Description, it can be seen that various features are grouped together in various embodiments for the purpose of streamlining the disclosure. This method of disclosure is not to be interpreted as reflecting an intention that the claimed embodiments require more features than are expressly recited in each claim. Rather, as the following claims reflect, inventive subject matter lies in less than all features of a single disclosed embodiment. Thus, the following claims are hereby incorporated into the Detailed Description, with each claim standing on its own as a separately claimed subject matter.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2217911 | Lindenblad | Oct 1940 | A |
2562332 | Riblet | Jul 1951 | A |
2716191 | Bartuska, Jr. | Aug 1955 | A |
3022506 | Goebels | Feb 1962 | A |
3063049 | Kelly | Nov 1962 | A |
3299428 | Tessari, III | Jan 1967 | A |
3417400 | Black | Dec 1968 | A |
3626418 | Berryman, Jr. | Dec 1971 | A |
3665480 | Fassett | May 1972 | A |
3680112 | Thomas | Jul 1972 | A |
3713167 | David | Jan 1973 | A |
4200873 | Seeley | Apr 1980 | A |
4491977 | Paul | Jan 1985 | A |
4608572 | Blakney | Aug 1986 | A |
4994817 | Munson | Feb 1991 | A |
4994820 | Suzuki | Feb 1991 | A |
5061939 | Nakase | Oct 1991 | A |
5523767 | McCorkle | Jun 1996 | A |
5539418 | Egashira | Jul 1996 | A |
5675346 | Nishikawa et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5694136 | Westfall | Dec 1997 | A |
5864318 | Cosenza | Jan 1999 | A |
5986615 | Westfall | Nov 1999 | A |
6014114 | Westfall | Jan 2000 | A |
6124833 | Bialkowski | Sep 2000 | A |
6473048 | Diaz | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6816122 | Noro | Nov 2004 | B2 |
7057558 | Fukushima | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7283101 | Bisiules | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7420525 | Colburn et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7570219 | Paulsen et al. | Aug 2009 | B1 |
8159394 | Hayes et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8228258 | Montgomery | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8339324 | Dufilie | Dec 2012 | B1 |
8344820 | Chen et al. | Jan 2013 | B1 |
8599083 | Lindenmeier | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8681063 | Endou | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8723731 | Tatarnikov | May 2014 | B2 |
8847832 | Parsche | Sep 2014 | B2 |
9331388 | Lindenmeier | May 2016 | B2 |
9484634 | Behroozi | Nov 2016 | B1 |
9608323 | Berens | Mar 2017 | B1 |
20030107524 | Hart | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20050140557 | Kuroda | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060232490 | Bisiules | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070085743 | Eberhardt | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070205952 | Deng | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070216595 | Hashiyama | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080048867 | Oliver | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080180254 | Kajander | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080204326 | Zeinolabedin et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20090046026 | Nakano | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090096699 | Chiu et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090146902 | Li | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090237314 | Lalezari | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090289865 | Parsche | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100214177 | Parsche | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100231475 | Ou et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100253587 | Lindenmeier | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20120068903 | Thevenard | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120075163 | Nilsson | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120139806 | Zhan et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120212383 | Sengupta | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120218157 | Endou et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20130076584 | Wong | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130093641 | Ng | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130278475 | Sabielny | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140266956 | Rankin | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140347243 | Abadi | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150011168 | Chen | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150255874 | Hung | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150357720 | Chen | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160043472 | Fasenfest | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160056542 | Faraone et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160226145 | Xu | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20170025750 | Su | Jan 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
199059089 | Jan 1991 | AU |
2007234730 | Oct 2007 | AU |
1437795 | Jul 2004 | EP |
1 830 485 | Sep 2007 | EP |
2 221 915 | Aug 2010 | EP |
2 372 839 | Oct 2011 | EP |
2693565 | Feb 2014 | EP |
1529776 | Jun 1977 | GB |
H02 65505 | Mar 1990 | JP |
200892491 | Apr 2008 | JP |
4744411 | Aug 2011 | JP |
2009142895 | Nov 2009 | WO |
2012055883 | May 2012 | WO |
WO2016028475 | Feb 2016 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Arun Raaza and Amit Mehta, “Multiple Beams Scanning Double Square Loop Antenna for UWB Communications” IEEE 2010. |
The United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/225,558 dated Apr. 20, 2016. |
The United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/225,558 dated Sep. 29, 2015. |
Rajagopalan et al., “Dielectric and Conductor Loss Quantification for Miscrstrip Reflectarray: Simulations and Measurement,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 56, No. 4, Apr. 2008, pp. 1192-1196. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority issued in connection with International App. No. PCT/US2014/062162 dated Feb. 2, 2015. |
Parker G. et al.: “A dual polarized microstrip ring antenna with good isolation,” Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium, 1997. IEEE Digest Montreal, Que., Canada Jul. 13-18, 1997, New York, NY, USA, IEEEE, US vol. 2, Jul. 13, 1997, pp. 928-931, XP010246970 DOI: 10.1109/APS.1997.631679, ISBN: 978-0-7803-4178-4. |
The United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/462,762 dated Feb. 3, 2016. |
The United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/225,558 dated Oct. 18, 2016. |
Office Action for Canadian Patent Application No. 2928416 dated Mar. 8, 2017. |
German Office Action for German Application No. 112014005080.6 dated Jul. 13, 2016. |
Office Action for GB Patent Application No. 1607368.6 dated Sep. 5, 2017. |
The United States Patent and Trademark Office, “Non-Final Office Action,” issued in connection with U.S. Appl. No. 14/225,558 dated Oct. 10, 2017. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150123868 A1 | May 2015 | US |