This application claims priority to, and the benefit of Provisional Patent Application 62/366,283 filed on Jul. 25, 2016.
This disclosure relates to the general field of photobioreactors, and has certain specific applications for growing photosynthetic organisms, organisms that feed on photosynthetic organisms and hydroponics.
Photobioreactors are used to cultivate photosynthetic organisms. These organisms use light to generate organic compounds from carbon dioxide to provide energy and other substances to maintain growth, reproduction and survival. Examples of photosynthetic organisms include plants, macro and microalgae and certain types of bacteria. Photobioreactors can also be used to cultivate organisms such as copepods and brine shrimp that feed on photosynthetic organisms cultivated in a photobioreactor. Most photobioreactors are designed to cultivate organisms in the presence of sunlight. They are generally large units able to cultivate significant volumes of organisms. Examples of these photobioreactors include Tubular, Christmas Tree, Plate, Horizontal, Foil and Porous Substrate Photobioreactors. There are also smaller photobioreactors used in laboratory settings that are based on microbiological fermentation systems. These laboratory-based systems generally require other supporting laboratory equipment such as autoclaves, power supplies, computer controllers, pH meters and sterile tissue culture hoods. Finally, hobbyists and small commercial entities use improvised photobioreactors that generally consist of containers fitted with aeration tubes that are placed in front of fluorescent lights.
The present invention is designed for hobbyists or small commercial entities that intend to run a photobioreactor indoors without sunlight and do not have access to supporting laboratory equipment. Current photobioreactors for these users generally consist of clear culture vessels into which is placed an aeration tube. The culture vessels are placed in front of a bank of fluorescent lights. There have been disclosures of culture systems with built in lights. Typically, these lights are housed in a tube that extends into the center of the culture vessel. These systems must be thoroughly cleaned after each culture to prevent contamination. The process is unreliable and time consuming.
The present photobioreactors have several advantages over current photobioreactors. Since the light source is integrated into the culture vessel there is no need for external light sources and so a lot less space is required to culture the same volume of photosynthetic organisms. In addition, because the light source in the current photobioreactors is positioned around the circumference of the culture vessel the light path that illuminates the culture is reduced compared to a single light source external to the culture vessel or designed in a chamber within the culture vessel, as is the case with other culture containers. As a result, the culture is more effectively and uniformly illuminated. Another advantage is the use of a plastic bag liner as the primary culture contacting surface. Disposable plastic bags can be obtained that are sufficiently clean without additional sterilization to allow their direct use without the risk of culture contamination. The bag is then disposed of after the culture is grown and this dramatically simplifies the culture process and obviates the need to extensively clean the culture vessel between cultures. An additional advantage to the current photobioreactors is the cap system. Preferably the cap is made of rubber to allow repeated cleaning and sterilization with rubbing alcohol or household bleach. Furthermore, the cap has several bulkheads with quick connect fittings such that aeration and dosing tubes can be easily changed between cultures. In addition, the cap has a circumferential clamp with a thumbscrew so that is can be easily placed over the primary container and tightened in place, thus trapping the plastic bag liner between the primary culture vessel and the cap. Since the cap creates an airtight fit, the aeration tube produces positive pressure within the culture container. Furthermore, the air admitted into the culture container can be passed through a sub-micron, in-line air filter. The combination of sub-micron filtered air and positive pressure in the culture container decreases the likelihood of contamination of the culture compared to current methods.
Various embodiments of the invention are disclosed in the following detailed description and accompanying drawings.
The following is a detailed description of exemplary embodiments to illustrate the principles of the invention. The embodiments are provided to illustrate aspects of the invention, but the invention is not limited to any embodiment. The scope of the invention encompasses numerous alternatives, modifications and equivalent; it is limited only by the claims.
Numerous specific details are set forth in the following description in order to provide a thorough understanding of the invention. However, the invention may be practiced according to the claims without some or all of these specific details. For the purpose of clarity, technical material that is known in the technical fields related to the invention has not been described in detail so that the invention is not unnecessarily obscured.
In one embodiment of the invention, the compact photobioreactor is used to grow a culture of phytoplankton. The compact photobioreactor can be configured to grow a culture of phytoplankton (
The first step to use the Phytoplankton culture system is to insert plastic tubes into the cap's quick connect bulkhead fittings for the air vent, aeration and dosing (
In a second embodiment the compact photobioreactor is used to grow and maintain a culture of an organism that feeds upon phytoplankton. Examples include copepods and brine shrimp. In this embodiment, the photobioreactor is prepared as previously described. However, instead of adding a small volume of a phytoplankton starter culture, a large volume of dense phytoplankton is added to the container. Also added to the container is a population of copepods or brine shrimp that will feed on the phytoplankton to grow and reproduce. Organisms such as tisbe copepods are benthic and prefer a substrate to grow on. For these benthic organisms, substrates can be placed into the container to support growth. These substrates can be naturally derived such as small rocks or shells, or they can be synthetic such as ceramics, meshes or sponges. In one method, a small air lift filter can be attached to the aeration tube and fitted with a nylon mesh. In addition, some organisms require gentile aeration. To provide gentle aeration the airline can be fitted with a valve to control the air flow into the container. Additionally, some organisms require lower light levels for optimum growth and survival. In these cases, a dimmer switch can be used between the power supply and the compact photobioreactor to adjust the light level as appropriate. The diagram in
In another embodiment, the compact photobioreactor can be used to grow and maintain macroalgae such as chaetomorpha. Marine aquariums benefit from low phosphate and nitrate levels. One method to maintain low levels is to expose the aquarium water to macroalgae such as chaetomorpha. This is often accomplished by placing macroalgae in a sump or refugium and illuminating it with light. The macroalgae consumes phosphate and nitrate to grow thus removing those chemicals from the aquarium water. When a large amount of macroalgae accumulates, some of it can be removed thus exporting phosphate and nitrate from the environment. The remainder can be left in the sump or refugium to repeat the cycle. The present disclosure offers an alternative and advantageous method. The compact photobioreactor is constructed as described above, however in this embodiment, the cap is configured differently. It is equipped with two bulkheads, one for the introduction of aquarium water (inlet port), and a second for the return of aquarium water (outlet port) (
In another embodiment, the compact photobioreactor can be used to grow and maintain a plant as a hydroponics system. In this embodiment, a plant in a mesh pot is placed inside the compact photobioreactor with a volume of hydroponics medium such that the mesh pot is submerged but the rest of the plant is above the water level. In this configuration, the cap is equipped with a water inlet and outlet, both of which are connected to tubes that extend from the cap into the container and terminate below the level of the hydroponics medium (
The disclosed embodiments are illustrative, not restrictive. While specific configurations of the compact photobioreactor have been described, it is understood that the present invention can be applied to the growth and maintenance of a wide variety of photosynthetic organisms. There are many alternative ways of implementing the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4255383 | Schenck | Mar 1981 | A |
4868123 | Berson et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4952511 | Radmer | Aug 1990 | A |
5104803 | Delente | Apr 1992 | A |
5137828 | Robinson et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5151347 | Delente et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5160329 | Oxley | Nov 1992 | A |
5162051 | Hoeksema | Nov 1992 | A |
6150166 | Miller | Nov 2000 | A |
6509188 | Trösch et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6571735 | Wilkinson | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6602703 | Dutil | Aug 2003 | B2 |
7618813 | Lee et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7824904 | Dimanshteyn | Nov 2010 | B1 |
7997025 | Masse | Aug 2011 | B1 |
8003370 | Maltezos et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8110395 | Lewnard et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
D661644 | Heidtmann | Jun 2012 | S |
8198076 | Hu et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8241895 | Hu et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8318478 | Dahle | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8341877 | Licamete et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
D679965 | Licamele | Apr 2013 | S |
8409845 | Trent et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
D682637 | Licamele | May 2013 | S |
8470540 | Green et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8470584 | Bayless et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8479441 | Williamson et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8569050 | Ericsson | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8586344 | Mueller-Rees et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8642326 | Schaefer et al. | Feb 2014 | B1 |
8658420 | Gomey et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8658421 | Kim et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8722396 | Kassebaum et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8765460 | Nordvik et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8809041 | Woerlee et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8822199 | Muller-Feuga et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8852924 | Maranhao | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8877487 | Slagel | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8895279 | Burke | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8940518 | Meiser et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8945916 | Chou | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8955249 | Veres et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8986985 | Levin | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9005918 | Dvorak et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9040283 | Muller-Feuga | May 2015 | B2 |
9045724 | Roux Dit Buisson | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9102923 | Meiser et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9115008 | Farrish | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9181520 | Lee et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9222065 | Lee et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9284519 | Aikens et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9290733 | Muller-Feuga | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9295206 | Jovine | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9329131 | Dodge et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9347030 | Fiorentino | May 2016 | B2 |
9376656 | Bartilson | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9382508 | Schuessler et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9445551 | Chapman et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9453193 | Babbitt et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9464303 | Burke | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9469832 | Mena Mas | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9518248 | Erickson et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9523069 | Jeong et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9523070 | Erickson et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9534194 | Vellinga | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9637714 | Willson et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9644176 | Henderson | May 2017 | B2 |
9688950 | Roulston | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9708207 | Farrish | Jul 2017 | B2 |
20020102719 | Adelberg | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20090313894 | Bieber | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100105125 | Haley, III | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20110154985 | Mittelmark | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20120107792 | Babbitt | May 2012 | A1 |
20160130542 | Wilson | May 2016 | A1 |
20170362561 | Chung | Dec 2017 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Biotechnol Bioeng. Nov. 20, 1994;44(10):1161-7. High-density algal photobioreactors using light-emitting diodes. Lee CG, Palsson Bø. |
Appl Microbiol Biotechnot. Mar. 2011. 89(5):1275-88. doi: 10.1007/s00253-010-3047-8. Epub Dec. 23, 2010. Light requirements in microalgal photobioreactors: an overview of biophotonic aspects, Carvalho AP , Silva SO, Baptsta JM, Malcata FX. |
Water Sci Technol. 2013;67(11)2543-8, doi: 10.2166/wst.201. |
3.128. A novel optical panel photobioreactor for cultivation of microalgae. Choi HJ, Lee JM, Lee SM. |
Trends Biotechnol Aug. 2014. 32(8):422-30. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2014.06.001. Epub Jul. 8, 2014. Light emitting diodes (LEDs) applied to microalgal production. Schulze PS. Barreina LA, Pereira HG , Persies JA, Varela JC. |
World J Microbiol Biotechinol. Sep. 2015, 31(9):1409-17 doi: 10.1007/611274-015-1892-4. Epub Jun. 20, 2015 18. A mint review: photobioreactors for large scale algal cultivation. Gupta PL . Lee SM, Chai H]. |
Appl Microbial Biotechnot. Feb. 2016;100(3) 1077-88 doi: 10.1007/s00253-015-7144-6. Epub Nov. 21, 2015 Application of light-emitting diodes (LEDs) in cultivation of phototrophic microalgae: current state 25 and perspectives. Glemser M , Heining M . Schmidt J , Becker A, Garbe D, Buchholz R, Brück T. |
Bioresour Technol. Sep. 2016;2 16:845-55 doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.06.027. Epub Jun. 11, 2016. Pilotscale bubble column photobioreactor culture of a marine dinoflagellate microalga illuminated with light emission diodes. L6pez-Rosales L. Garcia-Camacho F , Sánchez-Mir6n A, Martin Beato E , Chisti Y, Molina Grima E. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190021248 A1 | Jan 2019 | US |