[Not Applicable]
[Not Applicable]
The present invention relates to refuse container lifting devices, and in particular to refuse cart lifting devices. Refuse containers are often quite heavy, and therefore refuse collection vehicles are generally equipped with refuse container lifting devices to assist the vehicle operator when emptying the refuse containers. However, a refuse collection vehicle may encounter several different types of refuse containers on a given collection route, and the differences in these refuse containers often require the use of separate lifting devices. For example, large commercial refuse containers, or dumpsters, are typically emptied by tipping the container over the edge of the vehicle hopper using a variety of lifting devices, including tipper bars and cable and winch arrangements.
Refuse carts are relatively light refuse receptacles constructed from various plastics and other synthetic materials. Features of refuse carts may include for example hinged covers, locking covers, wheels, and handles in various locations and configurations. Capacities generally range from, for example, 30 gallons to 95 gallons. Refuse carts typically encountered in residential areas are emptied using a refuse cart lifter capable of engaging the refuse cart, lifting it, and inverting the refuse cart to empty refuse into the vehicle hopper.
Many prior refuse cart lifters presented a wide profile and thus protrude from the refuse collection vehicle so as to interfere with the emptying of commercial dumpsters when they are tipped over the edge of the vehicle hopper. Protruding cart lifters also created a hazard for the rear-loading refuse collection vehicle driver when backing up, and the side-loading refuse collection driver when navigating narrow roadways, such as alleys. Some lifter designs have addressed this problem by locating the lifter off to the side of or even completely beneath the refuse collection vehicle hopper. Others attempted to reduce the profile of the refuse cart lifter to address the lifter protrusion issue.
Another problem in the refuse cart lifter industry is that cart lifters typically hang down from the refuse collection vehicle, and therefore reduce the vehicle's ground clearance, particularly on uneven ground. Due to the increased distance of a rear-loading refuse collection vehicle from the rear wheels to the most rearward hopper edge, this part of the hopper regularly makes contact with the ground on uneven terrain. Thus, some lifter designs include a retracted position where the lifter is angled underneath the refuse collection vehicle hopper, rather than hanging straight down. However, this type of design may cause interference with light bars and other structural components of the vehicle hopper. Moreover, these angled designs are not suitable for mounting to flat-walled receptacles, such as intermediate containers. Thus, a refuse cart lifter that retracts to a compact profile and keeps all components forward of the mounting surface would serve to improve the operational ground clearance when mounted on a vehicle, and eliminate costly mounting modifications on vehicles or refuse containers.
Most refuse cart lifters used with rear-loading refuse collection vehicles where ground clearance is of great importance are designed with sliding lower hook mechanisms. These sliding mechanisms retract to decrease the side profile length of the refuse cart lifter in the retracted position. However, sliding mechanisms have an increased susceptibility to contaminants that increase wear and maintenance compared to rotating mechanisms. Thus, a refuse cart lifter designed with increased ground clearance with a rotating lower hook mechanism would decrease maintenance and cost.
Yet another issue involves refuse compaction cycles. Prior cart lifters continuously dump refuse into the portion of the vehicle hopper closest to the refuse cart lifter because these lifters cannot empty the refuse cart a substantial distance into the hopper when dumping. The refuse therefore quickly accumulates near the refuse cart lifter, which requires the vehicle operator to stop collecting carts and compact the refuse to prevent interference with the next lifter dumping cycle. Thus, a lifter that empties refuse carts further into the refuse collection vehicle hopper would decrease the amount of time and energy spent compacting refuse between refuse cart dumping.
A final issue involves maintenance of the lifter. Elevated hydraulic loads associated with some lifters correspond to increased wear and strain on cart lifter systems. Also, some lifter motor designs are readily susceptible to damage from contaminants present in the hydraulic system and eventually require complex repairs or rebuilding that can typically only be performed at the manufacturer's facility. Finally, many lifters use bearings that require regular greasing.
Thus, a need exists in the refuse collection industry for a residential refuse cart lifter that possesses a slim profile, provides improved ground clearance, decreases the amount of time and energy spent compacting refuse between the emptying of successive refuse carts, provides needed lifting capacity at lower hydraulic pressures, requires little maintenance, and is easy to repair or rebuild at the end user's facility.
The present invention relates to a refuse cart lifter that allows for an improved operating envelope of the liftplate. The improved operating envelope results from a wide range of rotation of the liftplate in combination with a unique lifting arm design. This yields a refuse cart lifter that is capable of being retracted when not in use for increased ground clearance, while dumping refuse further into the refuse collection vehicle hopper than prior lifters. This added dumping range increases the efficiency of refuse collection because a vehicle operator does not have to operate the vehicle's packing blade as frequently, resulting in savings in time and energy.
The presently preferred version of the refuse cart lifter utilizes a motor to rotate a lifting arm and liftplate 210 degrees for the purpose of dumping refuse containers into a receptacle. It is preferable to use a dual rack and single pinion hydraulically actuated unit as the motor due to its thin profile and superior lifting capacity at lower hydraulic pressures. This motor design also is preferable due to its open gear design, which makes it less susceptible to damage from contaminants in the hydraulic fluid system, and for the ease with which the lifter can be repaired or rebuilt at the end users facility. This actuator is based on the same design disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,773,812, which is hereby incorporated by reference.
The liftplate is attached to the motor using two lifting arms capable of directing the liftplate substantially forward into the vehicle hopper when used with a motor having a wide range of rotation. The liftplate has one fixed saddle, and the lifter employs a unique rotating lower hook mechanism. This new design allows the lifter to be more compact in its home (retracted) position and improves ground clearance when mounted on the rear of a rear loaded refuse collection vehicle.
Other design features include the use of composite materials in all bearing areas to make the unit more maintenance free by eliminating the need for regular greasing. Also, longer lifting and latch arms may be utilized to allow for mounting the lifter on the side of a side-loading refuse collection vehicle.
The present liftplate does not extend underneath the refuse collection vehicle in the retracted position, and therefore does not require modification of the hopper structural components. The slim profile of the lifter motor and the retracted position of the liftplate function to preclude interference with the dumping of large commercial containers over the lifter. Optionally, thin bumpers may be mounted to the vehicle to protect the lifter as large commercial containers are dumped into the hopper.
In addition to its compact profile and improved ground clearance, the present refuse cart lifter provides a sweeping motion of the liftplate that permits engagement of the saddle with the upper lifting point of a refuse cart over a wide range of mounting heights. While some previous lifters provided for up to a plus or minus one-inch range of mounting heights, the present refuse cart lifter may include a mounting height range of up to plus or minus four-inches. Significantly, the improved mounting height range is achieved without the use of alternate arm attachment points or the substitution of arms having a different length or geometry.
To empty a residential refuse cart into the hopper of the refuse collection vehicle, the lifter commences an emptying cycle. During the emptying cycle, the lifter motor rotates the liftplate from a retracted position to an intermediate position such that a fixed saddle engages the refuse cart. As the lifter continues to rotate, the cart is lifted in a sweeping arc motion towards the hopper. Meanwhile, a rotating hook mechanism gradually engages a lower lifting point on the refuse cart to prevent the loss of the cart into the hopper as the cart is emptied. At the end of the emptying cycle the lifter is in the dumping position, and the opening of the refuse cart is positioned significantly forward into the hopper such that the cycling of the packer blade is reduced.
An unloading cycle reverses the emptying cycle and the cart is brought back down to street level in a sweeping arc motion. As the cart descends, the rotating hook mechanism gradually disengages the lower lifting point on the refuse cart, followed by the disengagement of the saddle from the upper lifting point on the refuse cart after the refuse cart reaches the ground. The lifter can then be rotated further until the liftplate returns to the refracted position.
A full and enabling disclosure of the present invention, including the best mode thereof, directed to one of ordinary skill in the art, is set forth in the specification, which makes reference to the appended figures, in which:
The left pivotplate 57 is pivotally mounted over the pinion hub of the left lifting arm 53. The right pivotplate 58 is pivotally mounted over the pinion hub of the right lifting arm 54. The left and right pivotplates 57 and 58 are able to pivot independently of the lifting arms 53 and 54. The left and right locks 68 and 69, respectively, are pivotally attached at a first end to the inner surface of the pivotplates 57 and 58. Cam followers connected to the second end of left and right locks 68 and 69 ride inside a slot of the left and right driveplates 70 and 70a, respectively.
The left idler 59 is pivotally attached at a first end to the outer surface of the left pivotplate 57. The right idler 60 is pivotally attached at a first end to the outer surface of the right pivotplate 58. The left and right pull arms 61 and 61a, respectively, are pivotally attached at a first end to the liftplate 55. The second end of left and right pull arms 61 and 61a are pivotally attached to the second end of left and right idlers 59 and 60, respectively. The left and right push arms 62 (not shown) and 62a, respectively, are pivotally attached at a first end to the left and right idlers 59 and 60. The second end of the left and right push arms 62 (not shown) and 62a are pivotally attached to shaft 65.
Once refuse cart 104 is positioned adjacent to refuse cart lifter 50, refuse cart lifter 50 would be operated to rotate left and right lifting arms 53 (not shown) and 54 to swing the liftplate 55 up such that the saddle 56 engages refuse cart upper lifting point 106 as seen in
The words used above are words of description rather than of limitation. Although preferred embodiments of the invention have been described using specific terms, devices, and methods, such description is for illustrative purposes only. It should be understood that aspects of the various embodiments may be interchanged either in whole or in part. Therefore, the spirit and scope of the appended claims should not be limited to the description of the preferred versions contained therein.
For example, a refuse cart lifter in accordance with this invention could utilize single arms or multiple arms. Furthermore, the lifter could be mounted to a variety of structures, including freestanding refuse containers, intermediate containers, rear-loading refuse collection vehicles, or side-loading refuse collection vehicles. Thus, it should be understood that changes and variations may be made by those of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the spirit or the scope of the present invention.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/115,354, entitled “Compact Refuse Cart Lifter With Rotating Latch” filed May 5, 2008, which in turn makes reference to, claims priority to, and claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/915,849, entitled “Compact Refuse Cart Lifter With Rotating Latch”, filed May 3, 2007, the complete subject matter of which was incorporated herein by reference, in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3804277 | Brown et al. | Apr 1974 | A |
4773812 | Bayne et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
5024573 | Redding et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5026241 | Wyman | Jun 1991 | A |
5069593 | Zelinka et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5447405 | Bayne et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5466110 | Redding | Nov 1995 | A |
5772385 | Huntoon et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
6551046 | Dorrington | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6884017 | Arrez et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
7128515 | Arrez et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7806645 | Arrez et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
20020141854 | Arrez et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030053895 | Schrafel | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20060045681 | Bayne et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110052355 A1 | Mar 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60915849 | May 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12115354 | May 2008 | US |
Child | 12941782 | US |