The present invention is related to haptic devices capable of providing information to a user via application of shear forces to the user's skin.
The field of haptics is the science of interfacing with users via the sense of touch by applying forces, vibrations or motions to a user. Haptic devices are increasingly being used to provide sensory input to a user to provide information to the user: similar to the manner in which sights and sounds provide information to the user about a surrounding environment. As an example, one commonly available (albeit simplistic) haptic device is the game stick (or “joystick”) controller sold by Nintendo under the trade name “Rumble Pak.” This haptic device produces vibratory motion at various times during gameplay to provide the game player, through his or her sense of touch, with information relating to a scenario of the game: e.g., when he or she fires a weapon or receives damage in the game. Haptic devices are also recognized as an integral part of virtual reality systems, which attempt to simulate, through the application of forces to a participant, situations he or she “experiences” in the virtual environment.
While haptic devices have been produced for a variety of uses, many technological hurdles remain. As one example, many haptic devices must be produced on a relatively small scale, particularly those used in fingertip applications. Generating an effective, small scale haptic feedback device at commercially reasonable prices remains a challenge.
In accordance with one embodiment, the present invention provides a motion translating device for use in tactile feedback system, including a motion output device, operable to impart motion from the translator to a motion output device. A frame assembly can be operable to translate motion from at least one actuator to the motion output device along at least a first axis and a second axis. The frame assembly can have associated therewith a motion decoupling apparatus, the motion decoupling apparatus being operable to translate motion between an actuator and the frame assembly along one of the axes while at least partially decoupling motion between an actuator and the frame assembly along an other axis.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention, a tactile display system is provided, including a motion output device, operable to engage a target area of a user's skin. A restraining system can be operable to restrain a portion of the user's skin adjacent the motion output device. An actuation system can include at least one actuator. The actuation system can be operably coupled to the motion output device and can include: a first frame operable to translate motion from an actuator to the motion output device along a first axis; a second frame operable to translate motion from an actuator to the motion output device along a second axis. Each frame can have associated therewith a motion decoupling apparatus, each motion decoupling apparatus being operable to translate motion between an actuator and the frame along one of the axes while at least partially decoupling motion between an actuator and the frame along an other axis.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention, a method of translating motion from a pair of actuators to a motion output device of a tactile display is provided, including: coupling a motion output device to one of a pair of frames; and coupling each frame to an actuator through a motion decoupling apparatus, each motion decoupling apparatus being operable to translate motion between the actuator and the frame along one axis of movement while at least partially decoupling motion between the actuator and the frame along another axis of movement.
There has thus been outlined, rather broadly, the more important features of the invention so that the detailed description thereof that follows may be better understood, and so that the present contribution to the art may be better appreciated. Other features of the present invention will become clearer from the following detailed description of the invention, taken with the accompanying drawings and claims, or may be learned by the practice of the invention.
The present invention will become more fully apparent from the following description and appended claims, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. Understanding that these drawings merely depict exemplary embodiments of the present invention and they are, therefore, not to be considered limiting of its scope. It will be readily appreciated that the components of the present invention, as generally described and illustrated in the figures herein, could be arranged, sized, and designed in a wide variety of different configurations. Nonetheless, the invention will be described and explained with additional specificity and detail through the use of the accompanying drawings in which:
The following detailed description of exemplary embodiments of the invention makes reference to the accompanying drawings, which form a part hereof and in which are shown, by way of illustration, exemplary embodiments in which the invention may be practiced. While these exemplary embodiments are described in sufficient detail to enable those skilled in the art to practice the invention, it should be understood that other embodiments may be realized and that various changes to the invention may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention.
Thus, the following more detailed description of the embodiments of the present invention is not intended to limit the scope of the invention, as claimed, but is presented for purposes of illustration only and not limitation to describe the features and characteristics of the present invention, to set forth the best mode of operation of the invention, and to sufficiently enable one skilled in the art to practice the invention. Accordingly, the scope of the present invention is to be defined solely by the appended claims.
The following detailed description and exemplary embodiments of the invention will be best understood by reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein the elements and features of the invention are designated by numerals throughout.
In describing and claiming the present invention, the following terminology will be used.
The singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” can include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Thus, for example, reference to “a sensor” can include reference to one or more of such devices. Reference to “moving” an object can include reference to one or more steps or increments involved in moving the object.
When discussed herein, application of a shear force or motion to a user's skin is to be understood to refer to application of a force that results in a sliding motion or “skin stretch” being applied to the user's skin such that the user's skin is pulled (or tends to be pulled) in a transverse, as opposed to a normal, direction. Such an application will tend to create a tensile force on a trailing edge of the skin being targeted and a compressive force on a leading edge of the skin. Shear forces can be applied to the skin while sliding a contact pad across the skin (e.g., some slip occurs between the contact pad and the targeted skin); or while moving the contact and the surface of the skin together (e.g., little or no slip between the contact pad and the targeted skin).
Application of shear forces is to be understood to be distinct from application of kinesthetic forces, as that term is understood by those of ordinary skill in the art. As one example, the application of shear force to a user's finger pad by moving a shear plate transverse to the user's finger pad (thereby causing local skin deformations) is to be distinguished from the kinesthetic forces and motions experienced by a user as a stylus or other device is applied to a user's fingers or hand causing (or tending to cause) motion of the finger, hand, and/or arm joints. The local shear deformations in the skin resulting from moving a shear plate transverse to the user's skin are also distinct from the forces experienced by a user when a device is merely vibrated to provide information to a user.
Typically, application of a shear force requires relative movement of the user's target skin area (e.g., finger pad or palm) relative to a shear plate, which relationship can occur by way of movement of the target skin area, movement of the shear plate, or both. Typically speaking, however, relative transverse movement is required to apply the shear force that is reacted locally, whereas application of kinesthetic forces can be realized without locally reacted relative transverse motion, since the kinesthetic forces are reacted away from the target area of the skin.
As used herein, relative terms, such as “upper,” “lower,” “upwardly,” “downwardly,” etc., are used to refer to various components of the systems discussed herein, and related structures with which the present systems can be utilized, as those terms would be readily understood by one of ordinary skill in the relevant art. It is to be understood that such terms are not intended to limit the present invention, but are rather used to aid in describing the components of the present systems, and related structures generally, in the most straightforward manner.
As used herein, the term “substantially” refers to the complete or nearly complete extent or degree of an action, characteristic, property, state, structure, item, or result. As an arbitrary example, when an object or group of objects is/are referred to as being “substantially” symmetrical, it is to be understood that the object or objects are either completely symmetrical or are nearly completely symmetrical. The exact allowable degree of deviation from absolute completeness may in some cases depend on the specific context. However, generally speaking the nearness of completion will be so as to have the same overall result as if absolute and total completion were obtained.
The use of “substantially” is equally applicable when used in a negative connotation to refer to the complete or near complete lack of an action, characteristic, property, state, structure, item, or result. As an arbitrary example, an opening that is “substantially free of” material would either completely lack material, or so nearly completely lack material that the effect would be the same as if it completely lacked material. In other words, an opening that is “substantially free of” material may still actually contain some such material as long as there is no measurable effect as a result thereof.
As used herein, a plurality of items, structural elements, compositional elements, and/or materials may be presented in a common list for convenience. However, these lists should be construed as though each member of the list is individually identified as a separate and unique member. Thus, no individual member of such list should be construed as a de facto equivalent of any other member of the same list solely based on their presentation in a common group without indications to the contrary.
Concentrations, amounts, and other numerical data may be presented herein in a range format. It is to be understood that such range format is used merely for convenience and brevity and should be interpreted flexibly to include not only the numerical values explicitly recited as the limits of the range, but also to include all the individual numerical values or sub-ranges encompassed within that range as if each numerical value and sub-range is explicitly recited. For example, a numerical range of about 1 to about 4.5 should be interpreted to include not only the explicitly recited limits of 1 to about 4.5, but also to include individual numerals such as 2, 3, 4, and sub-ranges such as 1 to 3, 2 to 4, etc. The same principle applies to ranges reciting only one numerical value, such as “less than about 4.5,” which should be interpreted to include all of the above-recited values and ranges. Further, such an interpretation should apply regardless of the breadth of the range or the characteristic being described.
In one aspect, the present invention provides a compact device capable of providing tactile feedback in distal, proximal, ulnar, and radial motions to the fingertip of a human. Devices in accordance with the present invention can include one or more actuators and a unique flexure stage (e.g., a motion translating frame) to create this motion. The flexure stage typically includes one or more motion decoupling mechanisms to at least partially decouple motion between the actuators and a motion output in one or more axes. Thus, even though the actuators used in the system may be generating multi-axis movement, the flexure stage isolates the motion translated to an output device to substantially a single axis.
One exemplary embodiment of the present invention is shown in
The flexure stage 10 can be operable to confine the motion induced by each servo motor 36a, 36b to substantially a single axis. In one embodiment, the flexure stage can provide a travel of plus or minus 1 mm nominally and up to plus or minus 3 mm maximum. In one example, RC micro servos were incorporated into the device, the RC micro servos of the type sold under the name Cirus CS-101 4g. The servos can have a range of motion of 180 degrees: the system can utilizes about 50% of this range, equating to about 45 degrees of rotary motion to achieve 1 mm of linear motion. The device can use a Thin kPad TrackPoint tactor for the motion output device 30.
The tactile display 100 can exhibit a package design that is compact and modular such that it can be placed on the fingerpad of a thimble interface or embedded as part of other devices such as a computer mouse, steering wheel, telesurgical robot control interface, or a cane used by sight impaired individuals. It can be readily incorporated into the various systems disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/182,906, filed Jul. 30, 2008, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
The tactile feedback from the current invention can be used to communicate cursor location or suggested motions for mouse input. The shear feedback device can also be wirelessly activated and controlled, as would occur to one of ordinary skill in the art having possession of this disclosure. Wireless communication can enable applications in mobile navigation, especially foot-based mobile applications (e.g., the device can communicate with Google Maps™ on a PDA or cell phone, or the military can deploy soldiers with wireless enabled shear devices). Assistive technologies can also be enabled for blind or blind/deaf individuals.
The device can be used to provide tactile feedback in combination with a commercial 3-D force feedback device such as a PHANToM, made by SensAble Technologies. The present device can replace the PHANToM's current thimble interface, creating the ability for thousands of PHANToM owners to add tactile feedback to their devices.
The device can also be utilized as an alternative form of input device to the common computer mouse. The device could be used in combination with trackpoint mouse input interfaces of a variety of types. Assuming large displacements (e.g., +/−5 mm in two dimensions), the shear display can be used to represent or enhance the current location of the computer cursor. Alternatively, the device could be used to transmit shearing motions to the skin of the fingerpad to suggest which direction the user should move his or her finger to attend to a particular task or application.
Because of its compact design, the tactile display device can be added to many current devices and possibly suitable for applications in wearable or mobile computing. For instance, it can be used as part of a gaming controller interface. Great potential lies in applications which require communication of directional information. An example of this includes embedding several of the present devices into the steering wheel of an automobile, to communicate information from a GPS navigation system. Another example is to place one of the devices in the handle of an ultrasonic cane used by vision impaired individuals to guide them around obstacles. The shearing motion provided to the user's skin in each of these applications can provide the suggested direction cues in a very intuitive manner.
Turning now to
Slot 18 is formed in frame member 12a and serves to decouple motion imparted to the frame member 12a in the direction of the x-axis: in this manner, substantially all motion imparted to frame member 12a via the slot is translated into y-axis motion. Slot 20 is formed in frame member 14a and serves to decouple motion imparted to frame member 14a in the y-axis: in this manner, substantially all motion imparted to frame member 14a via slot 20 is translated to x-axis motion.
Similarly, servo motor 36b can be coupled to frame member 14a by way of pin 38b extending into slot 20 (see also
In this manner, the present invention provides a system that decouples motion imparted to the flexure stage by one or more actuators such that each actuator only imparts motion to the flexure in a single axis of movement. Thus, in the embodiment illustrated in
While not so required, in one embodiment, the flexure stage can be comprised of two different types of urethanes, one with 90A shore hardness (a relatively soft material) and the other with 80D shore hardness (a relatively hard material). In this aspect, the softer material serves as the biasing element or spring between two frames. The two different urethanes can be used to create a flexure that is compact and functional. The harder urethane can be used for the main structure of the device (e.g., the frame members 12a, 12b, 12c, 14a, 14b, 14c and 14d), and the softer urethane can be used to form flexible joints (e.g., the biased members 16 and 16a) to enable the flexure to move.
In another embodiment, the flexure stage can be formed from a single material with varying stiffness achieved by way of varying thicknesses of the materials, or varying shapes of linking (e.g., biasing) members. In one aspect, the flexure can be manufactured using shape deposition manufacturing. A variety of other suitable manufacturing techniques, including injection molding, can also be utilized, as will be appreciated by one of ordinary skill in the art having possession of this disclosure.
In addition to the servo motor actuators of
Various sensors 56a, 56b can be incorporated into the system to measure displacement of various portions of the frame member 10 and/or various components coupled to the frame member (e.g., tactor 30a in
While illustrative exemplary embodiments of the invention have been described herein, the present invention is not limited to these embodiments, but includes any and all embodiments having modifications, omissions, combinations (e.g., of aspects across various embodiments), adaptations and/or alterations as would be appreciated by those in the art based on the foregoing detailed description. The limitations in the claims are to be interpreted broadly based on the language employed in the claims and not limited to examples described in the foregoing detailed description or during the prosecution of the application, which examples are to be construed as non-exclusive.
Priority is claimed of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/149,561, filed Feb. 3, 2009, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4540979 | Gerger et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
| 4591868 | Cusey | May 1986 | A |
| 5028093 | Nason | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5184319 | Kramer | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5261266 | Lorenz et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5273384 | Dunbar | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5451924 | Massimino | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5587937 | Massie et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5589828 | Armstrong | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5625576 | Massie et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5631861 | Kramer | May 1997 | A |
| 5694013 | Stewart et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5709219 | Chen | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5721405 | Hamada | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5752795 | D'Adamo | May 1998 | A |
| 5765791 | Givonetti | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5767796 | Van Roekel et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5786997 | Hoyt et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5898599 | Massie et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 6042555 | Kramer | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6135691 | Nadarajah et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6158933 | Nicholson | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6184868 | Shahoian et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6208328 | Kawachiya et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6236306 | Liebelt | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6246391 | Ong | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6330837 | Charles | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6388655 | Leung | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6417638 | Guy et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6418362 | St. Pierre et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6494658 | Roy | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6535806 | Millsap et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
| 6565059 | Falconer | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6691972 | Oliver | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6693516 | Hayward | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6693622 | Shahoian et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6697044 | Shahoian et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6703999 | Iwanami et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6788999 | Green | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6793234 | Carlstedt et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6808350 | Tooman et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
| 6859819 | Rosenberg et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
| 6930590 | Ling et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6961644 | Mercier et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6982696 | Shahoian | Jan 2006 | B1 |
| 6995745 | Boon et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7077015 | Hayward et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7084854 | Moore et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
| 7152331 | Nakamura et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7196688 | Schena | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7209118 | Shahoian et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7215320 | Takeuchi et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7242112 | Wolf et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7271707 | Gonzales | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7333088 | Boon et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7339574 | Kyung et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7450110 | Shahoian et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7603214 | Tanaka et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7605694 | Prost-Fin et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7607087 | Prados | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7683735 | Shibahara | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7692552 | Harrington et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7710279 | Fields | May 2010 | B1 |
| 8004052 | Vaganov | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8125453 | Shahoian | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 20010052893 | Jolly et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20020033795 | Shahoian | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020145512 | Sleichter, III et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20030016207 | Tremblay | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20040010346 | Stewart | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040040805 | Bailey | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040060807 | Nishimoto | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040095369 | Takeuchi | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040104887 | Tsukamoto et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040106916 | Quaid et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040117084 | Mercier | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040129552 | Nakade | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040227727 | Schena et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040237669 | Hayward | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050021190 | Worrell et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050052415 | Braun et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050073195 | Popilek | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050110754 | Harley et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050110758 | Kyung et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050222830 | Massie | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050231686 | Rathjen | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20060115347 | Lee | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060115348 | Kramer | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060185921 | Cieler et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060192760 | Moore et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060227065 | Yukawa et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060256075 | Anastas et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20070008083 | Berg et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070091063 | Nakamura et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070100523 | Trachte | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070241595 | Nathan et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070265077 | Tom et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070299580 | Lin et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080024284 | Baratoff et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080088582 | Prest et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080111791 | Nikittin | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080120029 | Zelek | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080192002 | Funch et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080193260 | Yokokohji et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20090036212 | Provancher | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090096746 | Kruse et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090160770 | Shahoian | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090179854 | Weber et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090278798 | Kim | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20100070254 | Tsai | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20110032090 | Provancher | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110115754 | Cruz-Hernandez | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20120038468 | Provancher | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120122062 | Yang | May 2012 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 129044 | May 2005 | JP |
| 20-0222674 | May 2001 | KR |
| WO0191100 | Nov 2001 | WO |
| WO 03012557 | Feb 2003 | WO |
| WO 2006115347 | Nov 2006 | WO |
| WO 2009018330 | Feb 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009129287 | Oct 2009 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Related Case: U.S. Appl. No. 12/699,494, filed Feb. 5, 2009; William R. Provancher. |
| Related Case: U.S. Appl. No. 12/949,303, filed Nov. 18, 2010; William R. Provancher. |
| Arai et al.; Tactile Display Which Presents Shear Deformation on Human Finger; Proceedings of the 2001 IEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation; Seoul, Korea; May 21-26, 2001. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/182,906, filed Jul. 30, 2008; William R. Provancher; office action issued Mar. 29, 2011. |
| Micah Steele et al., Shared Control Between Human and Machine: Using a Haptic Steering Wheel to aid in Land Vehicle Guidance. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI. 5 pages, Oct. 2002. |
| Mark Salada et al., Fingertip Haptics: A Novel Direction in Haptic Display. Northwestern University, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering and Dept. of Psychology. 2002. 10 pages, Jun. 2002. |
| Knut Drewing et al., First Evaluation of a Novel Tactile Display Exerting Shear Force via Lateral Displacement. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception, vol. 2, Apr. 2005, pp. 118-131. |
| Vincent Hayward et al., Tactile Display Device Using Distributed Lateral Skin Stretch. Dept. of Electrical Engineering Center for Intelligent Machines. McGill University. 2000. 6 pages, Nov. 2000. |
| Vincent Levesque et al., Experimental Evidence of Lateral Skin Strain During Tactile Exploration. Center for Intelligent Machines. Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering, McGill University. 2003 pp. 261-275, Jul. 2003. |
| Aaron Morris et al., A Robotic Walker That Provides Guidance. School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburg PA. 2003, 6 pages, Sep. 2003. |
| Kanav Kahol et al., Tactile Cueing Haptic Visualization. Center for Cognitive Ubiquitous Computing. Arizona State University, Tempe Arizona. 2005. 4 pages, Apr. 2005. |
| Roope Raisamo & Jukka Raisamo. Haptic User Interfaces 2007. Power point presentation. 10 pages, Oct. 2007. |
| Alejandro D. Dominquez-Garcia et al., Haptic Interface for Automotive Steer-by-Wire Systems. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Laboratory for Electromagnetic and Electronic Systems. Abstract, 2006 1 page, Apr. 2006. |
| Fritschi et al., “Integration of Kinesthetic and Tactile Display—A Modular Design Concept,” Max-Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Germany, 6 pages, no date, Jul. 2006. |
| Kim, Youn et al., “Hand-writing rehabilitation in the haptic virtual environment” IEEE, 2006, pp. 161-164, Nov. 2006. |
| Mullins, James et al., “Haptic handwriting aid for training and rehabilitation” 5 pages, Oct. 2005. |
| Rabin, Ely et al., “Haptic stabilization of posture: changes in arm proprioception and cutaneous feedback for different arm orientations” The American Physiologial Society, 1999, pp. 3541-3549, Aug. 1999. |
| Lam Paul, et al., “A haptic-robotic platform for upper-limb reaching stroke therapy: preliminary design and evaluation results” Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, May 22, 2008, 13 pages. |
| Rassmus-Grohn, Kirsten, “Enabling Audio-Haptics” Certec, Lund 2006, 126 pages, Feb. 2006. |
| Mali Uros, et al., “HIFE-haptic interface for finger exercise” IEEE, Feb. 2006, vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 93-102. |
| Phantom Premium 1.5/6DOF, 1.5 Highforce/6DOF and 3.0/6DOF haptic devices, 2 pages, Jun. 2009. |
| Cavusoglu, M. Cent et al., “Robotices for telesurgery: second generation berkely/UCSF laparoscopic telesurgical workstation and looking towards the future applications” Special issue on Medical Robotics, Jan. 2003, vol. 30, No. 1., 11 pages. |
| Sallnas, Eva-Lotta, “Supporting presence in collaborative environments by haptic force feedback” ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, Dec. 2000, vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 461-476. |
| Sjostrom, Calle et al., “The sense of touch provides new computer interaction techniques for disable people” Technology and Disabilty pp. 45-52, Dec. 1998. |
| Sjostrom, Calle et al., “The sense of touch provides new computer interaction techniques for disable people,” Sweden 9 pages, Dec. 1998. |
| Abbott, Jake et al., “Haptic virtual fixtures for robot-assisted manipulation” Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University. 11 pages, Oct. 2005. |
| Maclean, Karon, Haptics and the user interface, www.cs.ubc.ca/˜maclean/publics/ 27 pages, Feb. 2008. |
| Phantom desktop haptic device, SensAble Technologies, Inc. 2 pages, Jun. 2009. |
| Provancher, U.S. Appl. No. 12/402,067, filed Mar. 11, 2009. |
| Provancher, U.S. Appl. No. 12/182,906, filed Jul. 30, 2008. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/949,303, filed Nov. 18, 2010, Provancher. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/041,169, filed Mar. 4, 2011, Provancher. |
| International Search Report for PCT/US2011/055633 dated Mar. 27, 2012. |
| Written Opinion for PCT/US2011/055633 dated Mar. 27, 2012. |
| International Search Report for PCT/US2008/071574 dated Mar. 18, 2009. |
| Written Opinion for PCT/US2008/071574 dated Mar. 18, 2009. |
| International Search Report for PCT/US2013/032053 dated Jul. 25, 2013. |
| Written Opinion for PCT/US2013/032053 dated Jul. 25, 2013. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/269,948, Mail Date Mar. 15, 2013, Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/402,067, Mail Date Aug. 3, 2012, Notice of Allowance. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/182,906, Mail Date Mar. 29, 2011, Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/182,906, Mail Date Sep. 19, 2011, Final Office Action. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61149561 | Feb 2009 | US |