The technical field of this disclosure concerns deployable reflector antenna systems, and more particularly methods and systems for low-cost deployable reflector antennas that can be easily modified for a wide variety of missions.
Satellites need large aperture antennas to provide high gain, but these antennas must be folded to fit into the constrained volume of the launch vehicle. Small satellites are particularly challenging in this respect since they typically only have very small volume that they are permitted to occupy at launch. Cost is also a critical factor in the commercial small satellite market.
Conventional deployable mesh reflectors can provide a large parabolic surface for increased gain from an RF feed. These systems often involve a foldable framework that can support a reflective mesh surface. However, these systems often require numerous longerons, battens and diagonals with many joints. The high part count and precision required of such systems can make these types of relatively expensive. Accordingly, many of these conventional mesh reflectors are optimized for very large satellites. Consequently, there remains a growing need for a low-cost, offset-fed reflector antenna design that can be easily modified for a wide variety of missions
This document concerns a perimeter truss reflector. The reflector includes a perimeter truss assembly (PTA) comprised of a plurality of battens, each having an length which traverses a PTA thickness as defined along a direction aligned with a reflector central axis. The PTA is configured to expand between a collapsed configuration wherein the battens are closely spaced with respect to one another and an expanded configuration wherein a distance between the battens is increased as compared to the collapsed configuration such that the PTA defines a hoop. A collapsible mesh reflector surface is secured to the PTA such that when the PTA is in the collapsed configuration, the reflector surface is collapsed for compact stowage and when the PTA is in the expanded configuration, the reflector surface is expanded to a shape that is configured to concentrate RF energy in a predetermined pattern. The PTA also includes one or more longerons. Each of the one or more longerons extend around at least a portion of a periphery of the PTA. These longerons each comprise a storable extendible member (SEM) which can be flattened and rolled around a spool, but exhibits beam-like structural characteristics when unspooled.
The solution also concerns a method for deploying a reflector. The method involves supporting a collapsible mesh reflector surface with a perimeter truss assembly (PTA) comprised of a plurality of battens which define a hoop. A deployed length of an SEM longeron extending around at least a portion of a perimeter of the PTA is increased. This action urges the PTA from a collapsed configuration, in which the battens are closely spaced, to an expanded configuration in which a distance between the battens is increased as compared to the collapsed configuration so as to enlarge an area enclosed by the hoop. Consequently, the collapsible mesh reflector surface is transitioned from a compactly stowed state when the PTA is in the collapsed configuration to a tensioned state when the PTA is in the expanded configuration. The mesh reflector surface is shaped in the tensioned state by using a network of cords supported by the battens so as to urge the mesh reflector surface to a shape that is configured to concentrate RF energy in a predetermined pattern.
This disclosure is facilitated by reference to the following drawing figures, in which like numerals represent like items throughout the figures, and in which:
It will be readily understood that the solution described herein and illustrated in the appended figures could involve a wide variety of different configurations. Thus, the following more detailed description, as represented in the figures, is not intended to limit the scope of the present disclosure, but is merely representative of certain implementations in various different scenarios. While the various aspects are presented in the drawings, the drawings are not necessarily drawn to scale unless specifically indicated.
The solution concerns a compact reflector which uses one or more storable extendible members (SEM) to facilitate deployment and support of the reflector structure. The reflector is a perimeter truss reflector in which one or more longerons which comprise the truss are each formed from an SEM. The SEM comprising the longeron is flattened and bent where it extends around the truss corners. Each of these corners is respectively associated with a corresponding one of a plurality of battens. The SEM is stowed on a spool at a single location on the periphery. During deployment, the elongated length of each longeron is free to move around each truss corner in a direction transverse to the length of the batten, thereby expanding all the bays. At full deployment, a spacing between the battens is fixed by a network of tension members and the mesh surface of the reflector.
An illustrative example of a deployable reflector 100 is shown in
As explained below in greater detail, each of the longerons 112 are advantageously comprised of an SEM. As used herein, an SEM can comprise any of a variety of deployable structure types that can be flattened and stowed on a spool for stowage, but when deployed or unspooled will exhibit beam-like structural characteristics whereby they become stiff and capable of carrying bending and column loads. Deployable structures of this type come in a wide variety of different configurations which are known in the art. Examples include slit-tube or Storable Tubular Extendible Member (STEM), Triangular Rollable and Collapsible (TRAC) boom, Collapsible Tubular Mast (CTM), and so on. Each of these SEM types are well-known and therefore will not be described here in detail.
SEMs offer important advantages in deployable structures used in spacecraft due to their ability to be compactly stowed, retractable capability, and relatively low cost. The longerons 112 can be comprised of metallic SEMs but such metallic SEMs are known to require complex deploying mechanism to ensure that the metallic SEM deploys properly. Accordingly, it can be advantageous in the reflector solution described herein to employ SEMs which are formed of composite materials. For example, the SEMs can be comprised of a fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP). Such composite SEMs can be composed of several fiber lamina layers that are adhered together using a polymer matrix.
In a slit-tube or STEM scenario, the slit in the tube allows the cross section to gradually open or transition from a circular cross section to a flat or partially flattened cross section. When fully opened or transitioned to the flat or partially flattened cross section, the STEM can be curved or rolled around an axis perpendicular to the elongated length of the STEM. The flattened state is sometimes referred to herein as the planate state. For convenience the solution will be described in the context of a STEM which transitions between a circular state and a flat or flattened, planate state. It should be understood, however, that the solution presented is not limited to this particular configuration of STEM shown. Any other type of SEM design can be used (whether now know, or known in the future) provided that it offers similar functional characteristics, whereby it is bendable when flattened, rigid when un-flattened or deployed.
Each longeron 112 is flattened and open where it changes direction at each batten 104. For a PTA which has the shape of a regular polygon, the longerons 112 will form an equal interior angle α at each batten. The batten advantageously include guide members 160 which include one or more contact surfaces 161, 163, 165 that are offset from the batten to enforce this angle α between the longeron sections on either side. The longerons 112 each gradually transition back to a circular cross section on either side of each batten 104. The longerons 112 can be securely attached to one side of the SEM-DM 106 by means of a lug 146 and on an opposing end is driven outwardly from a spool. In the stowed state, the longerons 112 may not be long enough to transition back to circular and therefore could be largely flat between the battens.
In a solution disclosed herein, a collapsible reflector 110 is secured to the PTA such that reflector surface 114 is shaped to concentrate RF energy in a predetermined pattern. The collapsible reflector 110 is advantageously formed of a pliant RF reflector material, such as a conductive metal mesh. As such, the reflector is 110 is sometimes referred to herein as a collapsible mesh reflector. The collapsible mesh reflector can be supported by a front net 130 comprised of a network of cords or straps. The front net 130 and the collapsible mesh reflector 110 which supports it can be secured to an upper portion 120 of each of the battens 104 and the SEM-DM 106.
A rear net 115, which is also comprised of a network of cords or straps, can be attached to a lower portion 122 of each of the battens, opposed from the front net 130 and the reflector surface 114. A plurality of tie cords 118 can extend from the rear net 116 to the front net 130 to help conform the reflector surface to a dish-like shape that is suited for reflecting RF energy. In
The PTA 102 is comprised of a plurality of sides or bays 132 which extend between adjacent pairs of the battens 104. In each bay 132, the PTA 102 includes a plurality of truss cords which extend between adjacent battens 104. For example, the plurality of truss cords can include a plurality of truss diagonal tension cords 124 which extends between a first and second batten (which together comprise an adjacent batten pair) from an upper portion of the first batten, to a lower portion of the second batten. A second truss diagonal tension cord 126 can extend between the lower portion of the first batten and an upper portion of the second batten. These truss diagonal extension cords 124, 126 can also extend between the SEM-DM 106 and its closest adjacent battens 104. Each bay 132 can also include at least one truss longitudinal tension cord 128 which extends between adjacent batten 104 in a plane which is orthogonal to a reflector central axis 108. In some scenarios, these truss longitudinal tension cords 128 can be disposed so that that a first cord 128 extends between the upper portion 120 of each batten 104, and a second cord 128 extends between the lower portions 122 of each batten. In
The PTA 102 in
The transition of the PTA 102 from the collapsed state to its expanded state is facilitated by the longerons 112. This transition process is partially shown in
When in a planate state the SEM comprising the longeron 112 will have a flattened configuration in which a length and width of the SEM are relatively broad as compared to the thickness of the SEM. When in this condition, the longeron can be rolled on a spool to reduce the overall volume of the structure. In
An illustrative SEM-DM 106 shown in
As shown in
Each of the battens 104 can optionally be comprised of a friction-reducing member The friction reducing member is configured to reduce a friction force exerted on the longeron 112 as the longeron moves transversely around the truss corner. As shown in
In
Of course, other configurations are possible and the solution is not intended to be limited to the roller configuration shown in
Referring now to
The contact surfaces 161, 165, 168 can be configured so that they touch the concave side, convex side or the edges of the longeron 112. Further, the contact surfaces may engage the longeron in the transition zone where the longeron is in the process of transitioning to a flattened state, or after the longeron has returned to the deployed state where it has a circular cross section. As an example, each of the contact surfaces 161, 165 could comprise curved slot in a rigid face 186, 188 that the longeron passes through. However, the solution is not limited in this regard and in other scenarios there could be one or more discrete contact surfaces. In some scenarios, these contact surfaces could be comprised of a low friction material so that they slide over the surface of the longeron. Alternatively, the contact surfaces could be configured to be rollers or bearings.
In the SEM-DM the deployment of two or more longerons 112 can be coordinated by disposing the spools 137, 140 on a common drive shaft 139/141. However, in some scenarios it can be advantageous to exercise additional control over the deployment of the longerons at each batten 104. As such, it can be advantageous to coordinate the travel of each longeron 112 as it passes through one or more pinch zones associated with a particular batten 104. To facilitate this result, the rotation of a first batten roller 150 (e.g., at an upper portion 120 of the batten) can be coordinated with a rotation of a second batten roller 150 (disposed for example at a lower portion 122 of the batten). In an example shown in
From the foregoing it will be understood that a longeron 112 is free to move transversely with respect to the batten 104 as the deployed length of the longeron 112 is increased. As a longeron 112 is unspooled in this way, the perimeter of the PTA will increase and urge the battens 104 to the expanded state which is shown in
Turning now to
In another scenario illustrated in
Various mechanisms can be employed to control an order in which the various sides of the PTA 102 are extended. For example, in one scenario the batten roller 150 and pinch roller 138 associated with different battens 104 can designed so that each presents a different amount of resistance or friction to transverse travel of the longeron through the pinch zone. To facilitate such variations in friction forces, different materials having different coefficients of friction can be selected in some scenarios for the contact surfaces 161, 163, 165 which are associated with each guide member 160. In other scenarios in which a roller (e.g. roller 150) is used at a batten 104, a friction brake shoe 153 can interact with a surface of the roller to apply a drag force. Accordingly, a longeron can be caused to fully (or partially) extend along some sides or bays of the PTA 102 before fully extending along other sides. Structural cross cords, hoop cords, and surface shaping cord net can be used to determine the final spacing of the battens when fully deployed. An example of such a configuration is illustrated in
One example of a STEM used to form the longerons 112 herein can comprise a semi-tubular structure as shown in
The solution is not limited to the scenario described in
Similarly, other solutions are possible. For example, shown in
It's also possible to design an SEM spool that sends out a longeron in more than one direction (e.g., by wrapping the longerons interleaved on top of each other in the spool). In such a scenario a single SEM-DM could unspool the longerons to the bays on either side of the SEM-DM.
Although the systems and methods have been illustrated and described with respect to one or more implementations, equivalent alterations and modifications will occur to others skilled in the art upon the reading and understanding of this specification and the annexed drawings. In addition, while a particular feature may have been disclosed with respect to only one of several implementations, such feature may be combined with one or more other features of the other implementations as may be desired and advantageous for any given or particular application. Thus, the breadth and scope of the disclosure herein should not be limited by any of the above descriptions. Rather, the scope of the invention should be defined in accordance with the following claims and their equivalents.
This application is a divisional application and claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/249,083 entitled “COMPACT STORABLE EXTENDIBLE MEMBER REFLECTOR” filed on Jan. 16, 2019, the content of which is incorporated herewith in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2806134 | Tarcici | Sep 1957 | A |
3064534 | Tumavicus | Nov 1962 | A |
3165751 | Clark | Jan 1965 | A |
3176397 | Schuhmann | Apr 1965 | A |
3179211 | Dunlavy | Apr 1965 | A |
3217328 | Miller | Nov 1965 | A |
3224007 | Mathis | Dec 1965 | A |
3360798 | Webb | Dec 1967 | A |
3385397 | Robinsky | May 1968 | A |
3397399 | Carman et al. | Aug 1968 | A |
3406404 | Maier | Oct 1968 | A |
3473758 | Webb | Oct 1969 | A |
3477662 | Anderson | Nov 1969 | A |
3496687 | Greenberg et al. | Feb 1970 | A |
3509576 | McLain | Apr 1970 | A |
3510086 | Arbeitlang et al. | May 1970 | A |
3521290 | Bahiman et al. | Jul 1970 | A |
3530469 | Dailey et al. | Sep 1970 | A |
3541569 | Berks et al. | Nov 1970 | A |
3558219 | Buckingham et al. | Jan 1971 | A |
3576566 | Cover, Jr. et al. | Apr 1971 | A |
3617113 | Hoyer | Nov 1971 | A |
3618111 | Vaughan | Nov 1971 | A |
3715760 | Palmer | Feb 1973 | A |
3735942 | Palz | May 1973 | A |
3735943 | Fayet | May 1973 | A |
3817481 | Berks et al. | Jun 1974 | A |
3863870 | Andrews et al. | Feb 1975 | A |
3913105 | Williamson et al. | Oct 1975 | A |
3978490 | Fletcher et al. | Aug 1976 | A |
4030102 | Kaplan et al. | Jun 1977 | A |
4030103 | Campbell | Jun 1977 | A |
4115784 | Schwerdtfeger et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
4133501 | Pentlicki | Jan 1979 | A |
4315265 | Palmer et al. | Feb 1982 | A |
4337560 | Slysh | Jul 1982 | A |
4352113 | Labruyere | Sep 1982 | A |
4380013 | Slysh | Apr 1983 | A |
4475323 | Schwartzberg et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4482900 | Bilek et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4498087 | Imbiel et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
4511901 | Westphal | Apr 1985 | A |
4527166 | Luly | Jul 1985 | A |
4578920 | Bush et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4613870 | Stonier | Sep 1986 | A |
4636579 | Hanak et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4642652 | Herbig et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4646102 | Akaeda et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4658265 | Heinze et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4713492 | Hanak | Dec 1987 | A |
4727932 | Mahefkey | Mar 1988 | A |
4747567 | Johnson et al. | May 1988 | A |
4769647 | Herbig et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4780726 | Archer et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4787580 | Ganssle | Nov 1988 | A |
4811034 | Kaminskas | Mar 1989 | A |
4825225 | Waters et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4862190 | Palmer et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4899167 | Westphal | Feb 1990 | A |
4926181 | Stumm | May 1990 | A |
4989015 | Chang | Jan 1991 | A |
5016418 | Rhodes et al. | May 1991 | A |
5104211 | Schumacher et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5198832 | Higgins et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5296044 | Harvey et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5446474 | Wade et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5451975 | Miller et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5487791 | Everman et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5488383 | Friedman et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5515067 | Rits | May 1996 | A |
5520747 | Marks | May 1996 | A |
5574472 | Robinson | Nov 1996 | A |
5644322 | Hayes et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5680145 | Thomson et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5700337 | Jacobs et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5720452 | Mutschler, Jr. | Feb 1998 | A |
5785280 | Baghdasarian | Jul 1998 | A |
5787671 | Meguro et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5833176 | Rubin et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5857648 | Dailey et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5864324 | Acker et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5927654 | Foley et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5963182 | Bassily | Oct 1999 | A |
5968641 | Lewis | Oct 1999 | A |
5990851 | Henderson | Nov 1999 | A |
6017002 | Burke et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6028569 | Bassily et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6028570 | Gilger et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6104358 | Parker et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6137454 | Peck | Oct 2000 | A |
6150995 | Gilger | Nov 2000 | A |
6208317 | Taylor et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6219009 | Shipley et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6225965 | Gilger et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6228441 | Suzuki et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6243053 | Shtarkman | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6278416 | Harless | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6313811 | Harless | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6321503 | Warren | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6323827 | Gilger et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6343442 | Marks | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6344835 | Allen et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6353421 | Lalezari et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6373449 | Bokulic et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6384800 | Bassily et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6417818 | Shipley et al. | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6437232 | Dailey et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6441801 | Knight et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6478261 | Laraway et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6542132 | Stern | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6547190 | Thompson et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6568638 | Capots | May 2003 | B1 |
6581883 | McGee et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6609683 | Bauer et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6618025 | Harless | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6624796 | Talley et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6637702 | McCandless | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6702976 | Sokolowski | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6735920 | Cadogan | May 2004 | B1 |
6772479 | Hinkley et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6775046 | Hill et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6828949 | Harless | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6872433 | Seward et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6904722 | Brown | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6930654 | Schmid et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6956696 | Hachkowski et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6983914 | Stribling et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7009578 | Nolan et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7059094 | Yamawaki | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7098867 | Gullapalli | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7216995 | Harada et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7429074 | McKnight et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7595769 | Bassily | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7686255 | Harris | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7710348 | Taylor et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7806370 | Beidleman et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7897225 | Campbell et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8061660 | Beidleman et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8066227 | Keller et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8109472 | Keller et al. | Feb 2012 | B1 |
8259033 | Taylor et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8289221 | Finucane | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8356774 | Banik et al. | Jan 2013 | B1 |
8387921 | Taylor et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8462078 | Murphey et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8654033 | Sorrell et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8789796 | Boccio et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8839585 | Santiago Prowald et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
9112282 | Nurnberger et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9153860 | Tserodze et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9281569 | Taylor et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9331394 | Toledo | May 2016 | B2 |
9484636 | Mobrem | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9496621 | Meschini et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9528264 | Freebury et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9608333 | Toledo et al. | Mar 2017 | B1 |
9660351 | Medzmariashvili et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9714519 | Slade | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9755318 | Mobrem et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9774092 | Fujii et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9815574 | Scolamiero et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
20020063660 | Harless | May 2002 | A1 |
20030201949 | Harless | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20110210209 | Taylor et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20130186011 | Keller et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20150194733 | Mobrem et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150244081 | Mobrem | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150288072 | Medzmariashvili | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150303582 | Meschini et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150368903 | Turse et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160352022 | Thomson et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170222308 | Freebury et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170256840 | Walker et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
108417991 | Aug 2018 | CN |
2014068342 | May 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Kovitz, J.M., et al., “A spline profiled conical horn antenna assembly optimized for deployable Ka-band offset reflector antennas in CubeSats,” Published 2016 in IEEE International Symposium on Antennas; AP-S 2016; 978-1-5090-2886-3/16. |
Peral, E., et al., “Radar Technologies for Earth Remote Sensing From CubeSat Platforms,” Published in Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 106. issue 3, Mar. 2018. |
European Search Report issued in European Patent Application No. EP19218040 dated May 19, 2020. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210384607 A1 | Dec 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16249083 | Jan 2019 | US |
Child | 17411865 | US |