Comparing Cognitive Remediation Approaches for Schizophrenia

Information

  • Research Project
  • 9812554
  • ApplicationId
    9812554
  • Core Project Number
    R15MH117676
  • Full Project Number
    1R15MH117676-01A1
  • Serial Number
    117676
  • FOA Number
    PA-18-343
  • Sub Project Id
  • Project Start Date
    8/1/2019 - 4 years ago
  • Project End Date
    7/31/2022 - a year ago
  • Program Officer Name
    RUDORFER, MATTHEW V
  • Budget Start Date
    8/1/2019 - 4 years ago
  • Budget End Date
    7/31/2022 - a year ago
  • Fiscal Year
    2019
  • Support Year
    01
  • Suffix
    A1
  • Award Notice Date
    7/19/2019 - 4 years ago
Organizations

Comparing Cognitive Remediation Approaches for Schizophrenia

Abstract Evidence over the past 30 years has revealed that 70-80% of individuals with schizophrenia exhibit marked neurocognitive deficits on measures of attention, learning and memory, problem-solving, language and sensory-motor skill (e.g., Reichenberg & Harvey, 2007). Particular significance has been attached to these deficits as their severity has been linked to impaired community function, social problem-solving and progress in psychosocial rehabilitation programs (Green et al., 2000; Green et al., 2015). Cognitive remediation (CR) is a type of behavioral intervention that addresses cognitive deficits in schizophrenia by restoring lost cognitive skills or providing strategies for bypassing deficits through task practice. Meta-analyses (Wykes et al., 2011; McGurk et al., 2007) have revealed that cognitive remediation is a validated approach to improving cognitive function in schizophrenia, however a lack of precision regarding the active elements of the intervention have prevented its recommendation as a standard treatment for the illness (Dixon et al., 2010). The present three-year proposal seeks to identify cognitive training mechanisms that are most effective at improving cognitive function in schizophrenia by comparing two different systematic programs of CR with different foci: drill-and-practice exercises vs. compensatory strategies. Both programs have strong preliminary empirical support. One-hundred and thirty-five clients diagnosed with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder will be randomly assigned to one of three groups: a neuroplasticity-based, drill-and-practice program of computer-assisted cognitive training exercises designed to restore lost cognitive capacity; a manualized strategy training method for bypassing deficits in cognition, or a computer games control condition. Study measures, organized according to an experimental therapeutics approach, with targets distinguished from outcomes, will assess generalization of any observed training effects.

IC Name
NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH
  • Activity
    R15
  • Administering IC
    MH
  • Application Type
    1
  • Direct Cost Amount
    299702
  • Indirect Cost Amount
    192708
  • Total Cost
    492410
  • Sub Project Total Cost
  • ARRA Funded
    False
  • CFDA Code
    242
  • Ed Inst. Type
    SCHOOLS OF ARTS AND SCIENCES
  • Funding ICs
    NIMH:492410\
  • Funding Mechanism
    Non-SBIR/STTR RPGs
  • Study Section
    APDA
  • Study Section Name
    Adult Psychopathology and Disorders of Aging Study Section
  • Organization Name
    WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY
  • Organization Department
    PSYCHOLOGY
  • Organization DUNS
    145683954
  • Organization City
    MIDDLETOWN
  • Organization State
    CT
  • Organization Country
    UNITED STATES
  • Organization Zip Code
    06457
  • Organization District
    UNITED STATES