Not applicable.
The present invention relates generally to power conversion and conditioning and, more particularly, to a compensator for reducing current harmonics from an unbalanced load.
Power plants are linked to power consuming facilities (e.g., buildings, factories, etc.) via utility grids designed so as to be extremely efficient in delivering large amounts of power. To facilitate efficient distribution, power is delivered over long distances as low frequency three-phase AC current.
Despite being distributable efficiently, low frequency AC current is sometimes not suitable for end use in consuming facilities. Thus, prior to end use, power delivered by a utility has to be converted to a usable form. To this end, a typical power “conditioning” configuration includes an AC-to-DC rectifier that converts the utility AC power to DC across positive and negative DC buses (i.e., across a DC link) and an inverter linked to the DC link that converts the DC power back to three-phase AC power having an end-useable form (e.g., three-phase relatively high frequency AC voltage). A controller controls the inverter in a manner calculated to provide voltage waveforms required by the consuming facility.
Motors and their associated loads are one type of common inductive load employed at many consuming facilities. While the present invention is applicable to different load types, to simplify this explanation, an exemplary motor with an associated load will be assumed. To drive a motor, an inverter includes a plurality of switches that can be controlled to link and delink the positive and negative DC buses to motor supply lines. The linking/delinking sequence causes voltage pulses on the motor supply lines that together define alternating voltage waveforms. When controlled correctly, the waveforms cooperate to generate a rotating magnetic field inside a motor stator core. The magnetic field induces (hence the nomenclature “induction motor”), a field in motor rotor windings. The rotor field is attracted to the rotating stator field, and hence the rotor rotates within the stator core.
Generally, a three-phase voltage source inverter is used to drive a three-phase balanced load. Under this condition, the inverter itself generates only high order current harmonics to its DC link side. The average current flowing inside the DC link side is constant. This can dramatically reduce the ripple current of its DC link capacitor. Thus, it is much easier for the drive to generate high quality input current waveforms using various topologies, (e.g., multiple phase rectifier system, regenerative drive, passive and active filtering rectifier system, etc.) Typically, it is not a problem for a standard designed product to meet IEEE 519 current harmonics specifications under three-phase balanced load conditions.
However, it is not uncommon to use a three-phase inverter product to drive a single-phase load such as a heater. This arrangement reduces the number of drive types that a user must stock and maintain. Due to a single phase configuration, a large number of low order current harmonics are generated in the DC link. With these low order harmonics, a corresponding large number of low order current harmonics can be generated by the rectifier system. It is typically not possible to have a standard design inverter drive a one phase load and still meet IEEE 519 current harmonics specifications. Moreover, a significant amount of the current and voltage stresses are added to either the DC link or the rectifier side components, thus reducing the reliability of the overall drive.
To this end,
At least some embodiments of the present invention include a compensator circuit for reducing low order input current harmonics in a three-phase drive system driving a single-phase load, the three-phase drive system including a three-phase source voltage connected to a rectifier system connected to a DC link capacitor connected to a three-phase voltage source inverter that provides three-phase power. The compensator can reduce low-order current harmonics to a level that complies with the IEEE 519 current harmonic specifications. The compensator also is cost-efficient and can easily be modified depending on the specific characteristics of the one-phase load.
The compensator circuit may be an inductor or a capacitor with an inductor.
Thus, it is one object of at least one embodiment of the invention to provide a passive compensator circuit that can be easily sized for a specific drive unit and one-phase load and can be easily installed into such a drive unit.
At least some other inventive embodiments include two identical compensator circuits in order to reduce the negative effects caused by a single-phase load being driven by three-phase power. The identical compensator circuits may be an inductor or a capacitor with an inductor.
Thus, it is an object of at least some inventive embodiment of the invention to allow for the components of the drive to have lower ratings and for easier control because of the symmetry of the compensators.
These and other objects, advantages and aspects of the invention will become apparent from the following description. The particular objects and advantages described herein may apply to only some embodiments falling within the claims, and thus do not define the scope of the invention. In the description, reference is made to the accompanying drawings which form a part hereof, and in which there is shown a preferred embodiment of the invention. Such embodiment does not necessarily represent the full scope of the invention, and reference is made, therefore, to the claims herein for interpreting the scope of the invention.
The invention will hereafter be described with reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein like reference numerals denote like elements, and:
While the invention is susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, specific embodiments thereof have been shown by way of example in the drawings and are herein described in detail. It should be understood, however, that the description herein of specific embodiments is not intended to limit the invention to the particular forms disclosed, but on the contrary, the intention is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
One or more specific embodiments of the present invention will be described below. It is specifically intended that the present invention not be limited to the embodiments and illustrations contained herein, but include modified forms of those embodiments including portions of the embodiments and combinations of elements of different embodiments as come within the scope of the claims at the end of the specification. It should be appreciated that in the development of any such actual implementation, as in any engineering or design project, numerous implementation-specific decisions must be made to achieve the developers' specific goals, such as compliance with system-related and business related constraints, which may vary from one implementation to another. Moreover, it should be appreciated that such a development effort might be complex and time consuming, but would nevertheless be a routine undertaking of design, fabrication, and manufacture for those of ordinary skill having the benefit of this disclosure. Nothing in this application is considered critical or essential to the present invention unless explicitly indicated as being “critical” or “essential.”
Referring now to the drawings wherein like reference numbers correspond to similar components throughout the several views and, specifically, referring to
Still referring to
The inverter 18 is positioned between positive and negative DC buses 28, 30, respectively, of the rectifier 16. Although not illustrated, as is well known in the motor control industry, inverter 18 includes a plurality of switching devices (e.g., IGBT's, BJT's, etc.) that are positioned between the positive and negative DC buses 28, 30 and supply lines 32u, 32v, and 32w. Controller 20 opens and closes specific combinations of the inverter switches to generate positive and negative DC voltage pulses on each of supply lines 32u, 32v, and 32w. By opening and closing the inverter switches in specific sequences, inverter 18 generates AC voltages having controllable amplitudes and frequencies on each of the supply lines 32u, 32v, and 32w. Drive unit 14 generates AC voltages on lines 32u, 32v, and 32w that are substantially 120 degrees out of phase with each other so that drive unit 14 provides three-phase power. Lines 32u, 32v, and/or 32w are coupled to load 22 and compensator circuit 24, as will be described in greater detail below.
As is well known in the art, the inverter 18 may have various topologies, including a voltage source inverter and a current source inverter. Typically, a voltage source inverter includes a flyback diode in parallel with each of the IGBT switching devices, while a current source inverter includes a diode in series with the switching device. The voltage output of the voltage source inverter is a PWM pulse signal, while the current source inverter generally provides a smooth sinusoidal output. In the art, current source inverters are employed for high voltage, high current applications (e.g., >1000V), while voltage source inverters are employed in systems with lower voltage ratings.
Referring to a first embodiment shown in
The compensator circuit 24 suppresses low frequency harmonics caused by the single-phase load 22 drawing power from the three-phase power supplied by the drive unit 14. For example, an uncompensated single-phase load 22 generates a large amount of low-order current harmonics on the DC link capacitor (not illustrated) that resides between the rectifier 16 and the inverter 18. These harmonics increase the ratings of the DC link capacitor and increase the ripple voltage of the DC link capacitor. An uncompensated single-phase load 22 can also heavily distort the input current waveform to the drive 14 on the lines 26a, 26b, and 26c so that it is not possible to meet some of the industrial standard harmonics specifications (e.g., IEEE 519). Additionally, an uncompensated single-phase load 22 can disrupt the control of an active front end rectifier thereby adversely affecting drive control.
Referring to
Referring now to
Vl(t)=Vlm·cos (ωt) (1)
il(t)=Ilm·cos (ωt−φ)
where Vlm and Ilm are the amplitude of the load voltage and load current, respectively, ω is the angular speed of the single-phase load 22 and φ is the power factor angle of the single-phase load 22. Based on the fundamental components of the load terminal voltage and current, the instantaneous active power flowing into the load 22 can be expressed as:
If there is no compensator circuit, the DC link current generated by the load 22 can be expressed as:
where idco,1(t) is the DC link current caused by the single-phase load 22 directly and Vdc is the DC link voltage. Equation (3) demonstrates that a large amount of second-order harmonics exist in the DC link current. If nothing compensates for the second-order harmonics, the drive 10 cannot provide high quality input current waveforms. Moreover, since most of these harmonic currents flow into the DC link capacitor, the current flowing into the capacitor increases dramatically and the capacitor may be damaged.
The inventive compensator circuits can help to cancel out this harmonic current. In general, the compensator circuit voltage and current can be expressed as:
Vc(t)=Vcm·cos (ωt−θ)
ic(t)=Icm·cos (ωt−θ−φc) (4)
where Vcm and Icm are the amplitudes of the compensator circuit voltage and current, respectively, θ is the angle difference between the load voltage and the compensator circuit voltage, and φc is the power factor angle of compensator circuit. Generally, for an inductive compensator circuit such as circuits 38 and 42, φc tends to be close to π/2. Generally, for a capacitive compensator circuit as discussed hereinafter, φc tends to be close to −π/2. Based on Equation (4), the instantaneously active power flowing into the compensator circuit can be expressed as:
If the DC link capacitor is sized appropriately and the DC bus voltage can be assumed as a constant, the DC link current generated by the compensator circuit can be expressed as:
where, idco,c(t) is the DC link current generated by the compensator circuit. The following equation can be used to compensate for the low order DC link current harmonics by canceling them out:
From Equation (7), the following equation can be derived:
Equation (8) can be used to calculate the size of a compensator circuit that will compensate for low-order current harmonics generated by a particular one-phase load on a three-phase drive.
The use of a three-phase inverter to drive a single-phase load tends to require that the inverter have an increased rating. Thus, it is important to minimize the overall drive rating by considering the following boundary conditions: 1) the load and compensator terminal voltages should not be over-modulated, and 2) the three-phase currents should be minimized for the overall operating conditions of the inverter. The design/sizing of the compensator circuit depends on whether the compensator is inductive (compensators 38 and 42) or capacitive (discussed hereinafter).
Inductive compensators, such as compensators 38 and 42, for use in an embodiment of the present invention employing only one compensator circuit as shown in
The first step in sizing the inductive compensator is to determine the best angle difference between the compensator voltage and the load voltage. Equation (8) shows that there are two solutions to cancel out the low-order current harmonics. These two solutions provide the same current ratings for both the load and the compensator circuit. A better solution can be determined by comparing the current ratings to the phase on the line to which both the load and the compensator are connected (e.g., line 32v in
Then the current for the phase on the line to which both the load and compensator are connected can be calculated as
To allow for the minimum rating of the drive, the following angle difference has to be close to π in Equation (11):
For example, for an inductive compensator where load current angle φε{0, π/4}, the following equations based on Equation (12) can be written:
Equation (14) is a good solution because it closes to π and tends to generate lower current ratings to the phase on the line to which both the load and compensator are connected.
The second step in sizing the inductive compensator is the determination of the inductance value. By combining Equations (8) and (9), the terminal inductance of the inductive compensation circuit can be expressed as:
In Equation (15), ωVlmIlm is mainly determined by the characteristics of the load. V1 max is the maximum allowable voltage of the compensation circuit that is determined by the DC bus voltage Vdc, load voltage Vlm and angle θ. When Vlm, θ, and Vdc are determined, the Vcmax can be derived using phasor analysis. Generally, the inductance of the compensator circuit can be set as Lc,max for minimization of the inverter current rating.
The third step in sizing the inductive compensator is the determination of the current ratings of the compensator circuit. Once the inductance of the inductive compensator circuit is determined, the current rating of the compensator circuit can be expressed as:
Equation (16) shows that the current ratings of the compensation circuit can be determined by the selected inductance Lc and maximum
The final step in sizing the inductive compensator is the determination of the maximum current ratings of three-phase inverter legs. By combining the selected solution discussed in Equations (14), (15) and (16) and by comparing the amplitudes of i1(t), ic(t) and the phase on the line to which both the load and compensator are connected as −i1(t)−ic(t)) the maximum current rating of the phase on the line to which both the load and compensator are connected can be calculated.
Referring to
Referring now to
Capacitive compensators, such as compensators 46 and 52, for use in an embodiment of the present invention employing only one compensator circuit as shown in
The first step in sizing the capacitive compensator is to determine the optimum angle difference between the compensator voltage and the load voltage. To allow for the minimum rating of the drive, the angle difference of ic and i1 has to be close to π in the following equation:
For example, when the load current angle φε{0, π/4}, then from Equation (18), the following equations can be expressed:
The first solution, Equation (19) is a good solution because it closes to π and tends to generate lower current ratings to the phase on the line to which both the load and compensator are connected.
The second step in sizing the capacitive compensator is the determination of the inductance and capacitance values. Generally, the impedance of the inductor in the capacitive compensator is much smaller than that of the capacitor. The impedance of the inductor is mainly determined by the switching frequency of the inverter (e.g., a 0.03 to 0.05 pu value can be selected). By neglecting the influence of the inductance of the inductor and combining Equations (8) and (17), the capacitance of the capacitive compensator can be expressed as:
In Equation (21),
is mainly determined by the characteristics of the load. Vcmax is the maximum allowable voltage of the compensator which is decided by the DC bus voltage Vdc, load voltage Vlm, and angle θ. Generally, the capacitance of the compensator can be set as Cc,min for minimization of the inverter current rating. To avoid resonance, it is crucial to select the resonance frequency of this compensator circuit to be much higher than the highest fundamental frequency of the load and much lower than that of the switching frequency of the inverter.
The third step in sizing the capacitive compensator is the determination of the current ratings of the compensator circuit. Once the inductance of the compensator circuit is determined, the current rating of the compensator can be calculated as:
Icm=√{square root over (ωCcVcmIcm)}={square root over (ωCcVlmIlm)}≦max(√{square root over (ωVlmIlm)})·√{square root over ((Cc)} (22)
Equation (22) illustrates that the current ratings of the compensator can be determined by the selected capacitance Cc and maximum load ωVlmIlm.
The final step in sizing the capacitive compensator is the determination of the maximum current ratings of three-phase inverter legs (which are connected to supply lines 32u, 32v, and 32w). By combining the selected solution discussed in equations (20), (21) and (22), the maximum current rating of the phase on the line to which both the load and compensator are connected can be calculated using phasor analysis.
Referring to
The design/sizing of the compensator components of the two-compensator embodiment can be simplified similarly to the hereinbefore described design/sizing methodology of the compensator circuits of the one-compensator embodiment. As above, the design/sizing depends on whether the compensator circuit is inductive or capacitive.
Inductive compensators, such as compensator 38 of
Where Vphase-u(t) is the voltage of the phase on line 32u, Vphase-v(t) is the voltage of the phase on line 32v, Vl(t) is the load voltage, and Vl is the amplitude of the load voltage. Similarly, the phase voltage of the compensator can be assumed as:
Vc(t)=Vcm·cos (ωt−θ) (24)
Generally, Vc(t) is decided by the load voltage command. The amplitude and phase shift angle of the compensator circuit can be adjusted to create a constant power flow at the output of the inverter.
Where iphase=u,2(t), iphase-v,2(t), and ic,2(t) are the three output currents directly generated by the phases connected to the load. Vcm is the amplitude of the compensator voltage, Lc is the inductance of both compensators (i.e., Lc=Lc1=Lc2), and φc is the angle of both compensator inductors.
Where iphase-a,1(t), iphase-b,1(t), and ic,1(t) are the three output currents directly generated by the compensator. Zc-l is an equivalent load impedance calculated by paralleling one compensator inductor with half of the load impedance.
By similar analysis, capacitive compensators, such as compensators 46 of
The benefits of using the
The particular embodiments disclosed above are illustrative only, as the invention may be modified and practiced in different but equivalent manners apparent to those skilled in the art having the benefit of the teachings herein. Furthermore, no limitations are intended to the details of construction or design herein shown, other than as described in the claims below. It is therefore evident that the particular embodiments disclosed above may be altered or modified and all such variations are considered within the scope and spirit of the invention. Accordingly, the protection sought herein is as set forth in the claims below.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional application 60/704,614 filed Aug. 2, 2005, hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60704614 | Aug 2005 | US |