The described subject matter relates generally to compensation for process variables in a numerically-controlled machining operation, and more particularly to an improved method of airfoil machining resulting in improved machining quality of compressor parts of gas turbine engines by modifying numerically-controlled machining process off-line, based on process and machine variables.
Numerically-controlled in situ milling machines are known in the prior art for providing automated milling processes. Numerically-controlled milling machines are sometimes used for machining compressor parts of gas turbine engines such as fan blades, integrally bladed rotors or impellers, for example from a solid forging. Up to 90% of the mass of the solid forging is removed after long machining operations. Machining of long blades requires long tools to be used in all operations including roughing, semi-finishing and finishing. The tools deflect during machining operation due to their low bending stiffness and do not remove exact amounts of material as programmed. Cutting forces are proportional to the tool-and-part engagement conditions, which continuously change throughout a machining process of airfoils in five-degree-freedom operation such that the deflection of the tools and therefore remaining material on the blade surfaces, vary in every operation and for each individual blade. Dimensional variations within accepted tolerance ranges caused by eccentricity of the tool, holder and spindle and unbalance asymmetries in the tool shape, can further contribute to variations in tool engagement and deflection. All these factors lead to dimensional variations and a potentially significant mismatch between the machined section of the blades, which require extensive re-working after the machining process is completed. Re-working is a manual process and may cause dimensional deviations on the blades which affect the performance thereof
Accordingly, there is a need to provide an improved numerically-controlled machining operation.
In one aspect, the described subject matter provides a method machining an airfoil part in a numerically-controlled machining process with a selected tool, the numerically-controlled machining process being based on given tool-and-part engagement conditions, the method comprising a) inspecting actual geometric parameters of the selected tool; b) predicting cutting forces in a computing program based on the given tool-and-part engagement conditions and using the inspected actual geometric parameters of the selected tool as inputs; c) predicting tool deflections under the predicted cutting forces based on a pre-measured static stiffness of the selected tool; d) modifying a tool path of the numerically-controlled machining process to compensate for the predicted tool deflections; and e) machining the airfoil part to a desired profile by use of the selected tool to follow the modified tool path.
In another aspect, the described subject matter provides an airfoil machining system having a numerically-controlled machine tool, the airfoil machining system comprising a storage medium containing data of a static stiffness of a cutting tool mounted on a spindle of the machine tool and data of given tool-and-part engagement conditions in the sequence of the desired operational steps; a scanning apparatus for inspecting actual geometric parameters of the cutting tool, the scanning apparatus being operatively connected to the storage medium for sending data of the inspected actual geometric parameters of the cutting tool to the storage medium; a computing apparatus capable of predicting cutting forces and tool deflections in a sequence of desired operational steps of the machine tool, based on the data stored in the storage medium; and a numerically-controlled unit capable of controlling the machine tool in the sequence of the desired operational steps to provide a desired tool path.
Further details of these and other aspects of the described subject matter will be apparent from the detailed description and drawings included below.
Reference is now made to the accompanying drawings depicting aspects of the described subject matter, in which:
Referring to
Referring to
The blades 14 are relatively long and machining of such long blades requires long cutting tools 22. The elongate cutting tool 22 has a relatively low bending stiffness and will deflect during machining operations under cutting forces. The deflections of the elongate cutting tool 22 will cause the actual tool path which forms the finishing surface of the blade to deviate from the programmed tool path which has been preset in the numerically-controlled machine tool 20. The tool deflection prediction system 30 according to one embodiment, is therefore provided to the numerically-controlled machine tool 20, to provide predicted tool deflection information (the predicted deflection of the elongate cutting tool 22) to the numerically-controlled machine tool 20 for modification of the preset programs therein, in order to calculate a more precise machining operation which will minimize variations and avoid significant mismatches among the finished blades 14.
Reference is now made to
The tool deflection prediction system 30 may further include a scanner 34 which may be a 3-dimensional scanner, for example mounted on the milling machine 21. The scanner 34 or other measuring devices are used for inspecting the actual geometric parameters of the cutting tool 22 which is selected for use in the machining process, as represented by block 56 in
The tool deflection prediction system 30 also includes a computing apparatus 36 which is used to predict cutting forces and static deflections of the cutting tool 22 during the sequence of desired operational steps, based on the data represented by boxes A, B and C in the storage medium 32 of
The predicted tool deflections of the cutting tool 22 are fed to the N/C unit 26 to for adjustment of the numerically-controlled machining process such that the tool path is modified to compensate for predicted tool deflections, as represented by block 66 in
The numerically-controlled machining process 68 begins after the modification procedure represented by block 66 is complete.
The tool deflection prediction system 30 is used off-line to predict tool deflections of the cutting tool 22 for tool path composition used by the N/C unit 26 to modify the machining process performed by the milling machine 21. Therefore, the tool deflection prediction system 30 is simpler and less costly than conventional real time adaptive control systems used for numerically-controlled machine tools to modify a preset N/C sequence of desired operational steps in a machining operation. The predicted tool deflections according to the described embodiments are computed off-line with the static stiffness of the particular cutting tool 22 when mounted to the spindle 24 of the milling machine 21 and the predicted cutting forces which are calculated with reference to the actual geometric parameters of the particular cutting tool 22, immediately before the machining operation. Therefore, this input data for computing the predicted tool deflections closely simulates the data which could be obtained in real time during the machining process such that the predicted tool deflections are very close to the actual tool deflections of the cutting tool 22 during the machining process. As a result of using the predicted tool deflections to off-line modify the machining process, the dimensional variations and mismatches between the machined sections of the blades are minimized.
The above description is meant to be exemplary only, and one skilled in the art will recognize that changes may be made to the embodiments described without departure from the scope of the described subject matter. For example, a scanner such as a 3-dimensional scanner is described in one embodiment, but any other type of suitable measuring device may be used for inspecting the actual geometric parameters of the cutting tool. In the described embodiment, the machining operation is referred to as airfoils of an integrally bladed rotor of gas turbine engines. However, the described system and method may be applicable in machining operations of work parts of any other types. The cutting tool used in various machining processes may be different from that illustrated in the drawings. Still other modifications which fall within the scope of the described subject matter will be apparent to those skilled in the art, in light of a review of this disclosure, and such modifications are intended to fall within the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3890062 | Hendrix et al. | Jun 1975 | A |
4078195 | Mathias et al. | Mar 1978 | A |
4442494 | Fromson et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
4559600 | Rao | Dec 1985 | A |
4584649 | Komanduri et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4995087 | Rathi et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5021941 | Ford et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5170103 | Rouch et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5282261 | Skeirik | Jan 1994 | A |
5286947 | Clyde et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5369870 | Ouchi et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5428201 | Kaneko et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5523953 | Araie et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5571426 | Akemura | Nov 1996 | A |
5649063 | Bose | Jul 1997 | A |
5664066 | Sun et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5831407 | Ouchi et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5957016 | Segalman et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6062778 | Szuba et al. | May 2000 | A |
6189426 | Segalman et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6471474 | Mielke et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6478539 | Trutschel | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6524070 | Carter | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6694213 | Claesson et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6850874 | Higuerey et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6905310 | Kawamoto et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6912446 | Wang et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
7099737 | Suh et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7340985 | Claesson et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7366583 | Burgess et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7377037 | Ouellette et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7472478 | Graham et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7559728 | Meier et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7634854 | Meier | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7637010 | Burgess et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7704021 | Hollmann et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7730813 | Schmitz et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7797828 | Beeson et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7810417 | Onozuka et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7992761 | Baumann et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8100655 | Stone et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8103375 | Ouellette et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
20040083024 | Wang | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20050004684 | Cribbs | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050133527 | Dullea et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060039792 | Ferte et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060090336 | Graham et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20070251072 | Beeson et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080105094 | McMurtry et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080250659 | Bellerose et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090144980 | Rangarajan et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090282680 | Kappmeyer et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100023157 | Burgess et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100036519 | Yamada et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100161107 | Kappmeyer et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20110180521 | Qiotter et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20120138586 | Webster et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
9323820 | Nov 1993 | WO |
2009106830 | Sep 2009 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130024021 A1 | Jan 2013 | US |