Many types of machines and devices are operated by a user pulling or pressing a mechanical actuator (e.g., a trigger, a button, etc.). For some equipment, the force with which the user operates the actuator effects the operation of the device. For example, the harder the user pulls the trigger of a drill, the faster the drill's motor is made to spin to increase the speed of the drill bit. Many types of such force-sensitive user-actuated equipment use a resistive actuator to control the operation of the equipment.
In one example, an apparatus includes a first electrode, a second electrode, and a third electrode having first and second opposing surfaces. The first opposing surface is adjacent the first electrode and separated from the first electrode by a first distance, and the second opposing surface is adjacent the second electrode and separated from the second electrode by a second distance. The third electrode is configured to move relative to the first and second electrodes. A capacitance sensing circuit is coupled to the first and second electrodes. The capacitive sensing circuit is configured to determine a capacitance using the first and second electrodes.
For a detailed description of various examples, reference will now be made to the accompanying drawings in which:
The disclosed examples are directed to a capacitance-based sensing technique to operate a device. In one example, a user of the device applies force to an actuator to thereby move the actuator to operate the device. The actuator includes multiple electrically conductive electrodes configured as one or more capacitors. Some of the electrodes are fixed in place within the device, and one of the electrodes moves relative to the fixed electrodes as the user applies force to the actuator. Movement of the movable electrode relative to the fixed electrodes changes the capacitance between the fixed electrodes and the movable electrode. The changing capacitance is determined by a capacitance sensing circuit, and detected changes in capacitance control the operation of the device. The device can be any type of user-actuated device, such as a drill, an angle grinder, electric screwdriver, other types of power tools, appliances, toys, joysticks, etc.
In general, the capacitance between two parallel plates is a function of the ratio of the area of the plates to the distance between the plates (as well as the dielectric constant of the material between the plates). As the movable electrode moves relative to the fixed electrodes, the amount of electrode surface area that overlaps between the fixed electrodes and the movable electrode changes, thereby changing the capacitance. The distance between the movable electrode and the fixed electrodes is nominally a preset distance and does not change. However, due to vibrations of the device and its environment as well as mechanical tolerances, the distance may indeed vary as the movable electrode translates relative to the fixed electrodes. In such situations, not only is the overlapping area of the electrodes changing, but so is the distance between the fixed and movable electrodes. This changing distance alone changes the sensed capacitance and the operation of the device. The examples described herein address this issue.
Facing surfaces 310 and 350 represent a pair of parallel plates thereby forming a capacitor. The capacitance of a pair of parallel plates is a function, at least in part, of the ratio of their area to the distance between the plates. With the movable electrode 120 in the position shown in
In
As the movable electrode 120 moves relative to the fixed electrode 210, the overlapping area between surfaces of the fixed and movable electrodes change. In theory, the distance D1 between the surfaces does not change. However, due to manufacturing tolerances in the dimensions and shapes of the surfaces of the electrodes, tilting of the moving electrode relative to the fixed electrode(s), and/or vibrations experienced by the device 100 containing the electrodes, the distance D1 may indeed vary. For example, as movable electrode 120 moves in the direction of arrow 205, the surface 350 of movable electrode 120 may become closer to surface 310 of fixed electrode 210 (i.e., D1 becomes smaller). A smaller distance between parallel plates of a capacitor tends to cause the capacitance to increase. Of course, the area of the overlapping portions of the plates also changes as the movable electrode 120 moves. Ideally, the capacitance of the parallel plates would only change due to a change in the overlapping plate areas, but in practice, the capacitance unfortunately is also influenced by any changes in D1. As D1 between surfaces 310 and 350 decreases, the distance D2 between surfaces 320 and 360 increases. As such and as further explained below with reference to
Control circuit 620 then closes switch S1 and opens switch S2 to again charge the parallel set of capacitors C1-C4. Control circuit 620 operates the switches S1 and S2 to repeatedly charge the of parallel set of capacitors C1-C4, and then transfer the charge from the parallel set of capacitors C1-C4 onto charge transfer capacitor Ctrans while determining the amount of charge transferred in each cycle. The amount of charge transferred from the parallel set of capacitors C1-C4 is a function of the effective capacitance Ceff of the set of capacitors, which in turn is a function of the amount of overlapping area of facing surfaces of the electrodes 120 and 210, and the amount of overlapping area is dictated by the relative location of the movable electrode 120 relative to the fixed electrode. Each change/discharge cycle takes a fraction of a second (e.g., hundreds or thousands of charge/discharge cycles each second). A predetermined number of charge/discharge cycles (e.g., 100) may be implemented by control circuit 620 to determine the effective capacitance of the of parallel set of capacitors C1-C4.
In the above examples, the movable electrode has an electrical connection to the capacitive sensing circuit 620. In one example, a flexible wire is soldered to the movable electrode with enough slack to allow the electrode to move without breaking the wire or the solder joint. However, it is possible that the solder joint will fail over extended use. As such, in some examples, the movable electrode is permitted to “float,” that is, the movable electrode is not directly electrically connected to anything such as the capacitive sensing circuit.
The arrows through each pair of capacitors C5/C6 and C7/C8 indicate the change in each capacitor relative to the other capacitor of the parallel pair. For example, due to tilting of the movable electrode 910 relative to the fixed electrodes 850, 960, 970, and 980, as the capacitance of capacitor C5 increases, the capacitance of capacitor C6 decreases, and vice versa. Similarly, as the capacitance of capacitor C7 increases, the capacitance of capacitor C8 decreases, and vice versa.
The effective capacitance between electrode 982 and 910 is:
Ceff_C5_C6=C5n+C6n (1)
where
C5n=C5+ΔC5+C5err (2)
where C5 is the capacitance of C5 with the electrodes at a fixed location (e.g., movable electrode 910 at a preset location relative to the fixed electrodes), ΔC5 is the change in C5 due to the movement of movable electrode 910 relative to the fixed electrodes (assuming no tilting), and C5err is the change in C5 due to tilting of the movable electrode 910. C6n is given as:
C6n=C6+ΔC6−C6err (3)
where C6 is the capacitance of C6 with the electrodes at a fixed location, ΔC6 is the change in C6 due to the movement of movable electrode 910 relative to the fixed electrodes (assuming no tilting), and C6err is the change in C5 due to tilting of the movable electrode 910. C6err is of the same magnitude of as C5err has an opposite effect on C6n as for C5n as indicated by adding C5err in Eq. (2) but subtracting C6err in Eq. (3). The relationships for C7 and C8 are similar to that described above for C5 and C6. That is,
Ceff_C7_C8=C5n+C6n (4)
C7n=C7+ΔC7+C7err (5)
C8n=C8+ΔC8−C8err (6)
The capacitance sensing circuit 1000 includes control circuit 1020, charge transfer capacitor Ctrans, and switches S3-S8. The control circuit 1020 asserts control signals to control the on/off state of each of the switches S3-S8. Connection point (which is connected to capacitors C5 and C6) is connected to switches S3, S4, and S7. Connection point 984 is connected to switches S5, S6, and S8. Switches S3 and S5 are also connected to a reference voltage on a reference voltage node 1111 (e.g., dedicated reference voltage with low noise to avoid influencing the capacitance determination), and switches S4 and S6 are connected to a ground node. Control circuit 1020 turns on one of S3 or S4 (but not both simultaneously) to thereby connect capacitors C5 and C6 to the supply voltage or to ground. Similarly, control circuit 1020 turns on one of S5 and S6 (but not both simultaneously) to thereby connect capacitors C7 and C8 to the supply voltage or to ground. In operation, control circuit 1020 can cause connection point 982 to be grounded and connection point 984 to be connected to the reference voltage (node 1111). The control circuit 1020 alternatively can cause connection point 984 to be grounded and connection point 982 to be connected to the reference voltage (node 1111). As such, the series-connected parallel pairs of capacitors can be charged with a supply voltage on connection point 982 and connection point 984 to be grounded, or vice versa.
Once the set of capacitors C5-C8 are charged with connection point 984 grounded (via switch S6) and the supply voltage applied to connection point 982 (via switch S3), switches S3 and S6 are opened by control circuit 1020, and the control circuit 1020 closes switch S7 to discharge the set of capacitors C6-C8 onto the charge transfer capacitor Ctrans. In accordance with any of various charge transfer techniques (such as those described above), the process of using connection point 982 to charge the capacitors and then discharge through Ctans is repeated multiple times (e.g., 100) to obtain a measurement of the effective capacitance between connection points 982 and 984. Then, the control circuit 1020 may repeat the charge/discharge cycles (e.g., 100 times) this time grounding connection point 982 and using connection point 984 to connect to the reference voltage.
The examples of
In this description, the term “couple” or “couples” means either an indirect or direct wired or wireless connection. Thus, if a first device couples to a second device, that connection may be through a direct connection or through an indirect connection via other devices and connections. Modifications are possible in the described embodiments, and other embodiments are possible, within the scope of the claims.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/802,460 and U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/802,463, both filed Feb. 7, 2019, which are hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4587850 | Moser | May 1986 | A |
6515489 | Min | Feb 2003 | B2 |
7674993 | Jeitner et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
8564313 | Ryshtun et al. | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8680876 | Kadono | Mar 2014 | B2 |
20040017209 | Goto | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20050007125 | Heger | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20070235272 | Sieh | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20140300375 | Kishiro | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20190084144 | Nieh | Mar 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
4032828 | Apr 1991 | DE |
19808549 | Sep 1999 | DE |
102005043107 | Mar 2007 | DE |
102005043107 | Mar 2007 | DE |
1428233 | Jun 2004 | EP |
3076136 | Oct 2016 | EP |
11118827 | Apr 1999 | JP |
H 11118827 | Apr 1999 | JP |
WO03025958 | Mar 2003 | WO |
2014143065 | Sep 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
PCT International Search Report; PCT/US 2020/016178; dated Apr. 23, 2020, 3 pages. |
Extended European Search Report in European Patent Application No. 20752660.9; dated Feb. 21, 2022, 9 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200256707 A1 | Aug 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62802460 | Feb 2019 | US | |
62802463 | Feb 2019 | US |