For Wavelength-Division Multiplexed (WDM) Passive Optical Network (PON) implementations, such as gigabit passive optical network (GPON), it is generally accepted that it is desirable for the Optical Network Units (ONUs) to have tunable downstream receivers and tunable upstream lasers so that so-called ‘colorless’ ONUs can be deployed and the inventory complexity implied by colored ONUs can be avoided. As understood by one of skill in the art, colorless ONUs refer to ONUs that are not tuned to a specific wavelength, whereas colored ONUs are tuned for a specific wavelength.
While costs have dropped for both tunable receivers and lasers, they still remain significantly more expensive than fixed optical components. In addition, tunable receivers and lasers also suffer from temperature effects which may make it difficult to maintain precise wavelength tuning. Furthermore, lasers used in burst mode suffer from short term wavelength changes from the beginning of the burst until the wavelength stabilizes due to the abrupt injection of current from an off-burst to an on-burst state. Thus, precise tunable optical components are expensive and, if they need to operate in an environment with a wide temperature range, may not even be feasible. However, in order to implement some systems, such as Next Generation (NG)-PON2, low cost precision, tunable ONU optics are desired. NG-PON2 uses a combination of Time Division Multiple Access (TDMA) and WDM which has also been referred to as TWDM-PON. There is currently no market solution to this problem and it is currently an impediment to implementing NG-PON2. In other words, there is no economically feasible solution currently available to provide low cost precision, tunable ONU optics.
In one embodiment, an optical node is provided. The optical node comprises a tunable optical transceiver having a laser and a temperature element. The optical node also comprises a wavelength shift stabilization circuit configured to adjust current provided to the temperature element such that wavelength shifts, due to changes in a drive current applied to the tunable optical transceiver, are reduced.
Understanding that the drawings depict only exemplary embodiments and are not therefore to be considered limiting in scope, the exemplary embodiments will be described with additional specificity and detail through the use of the accompanying drawings, in which:
In accordance with common practice, the various described features are not drawn to scale but are drawn to emphasize specific features relevant to the exemplary embodiments
In the following detailed description, reference is made to the accompanying drawings that form a part hereof, and in which is shown by way of illustration specific illustrative embodiments. However, it is to be understood that other embodiments may be utilized and that logical, mechanical, and electrical changes may be made. Furthermore, the method presented in the drawing figures and the specification is not to be construed as limiting the order in which the individual steps may be performed. The following detailed description is, therefore, not to be taken in a limiting sense.
The embodiments described herein provide a distributed feedback tuning mechanism to improve the performance of a tunable laser that is operating within a WDM PON while at the same time increasing the allowable wavelength tolerances in manufacturing which lowers the laser manufacturing costs as well as mitigates problems associated with wavelength drift over temperature. In addition, tunable receivers can benefit by application of the embodiments described herein.
The system 100 also includes a splitter 110 located in the optical distribution network. The splitter 110 is configured to provide signals to each of a plurality of stabilized tunable optical network units (ONU) 112. Each of the ONUs 112 is tunable to operate over a respective wavelength. In addition, each of ONUs 112 is configured to stabilize the short term wavelength drift as described below. Each of the ONUs 112 includes a transmitter 111 and a receiver 113.
As used herein, a tunable receiver is a receiver which has a broadband wavelength response from its photodetector and that has a narrowband tunable filter in front of the broadband photodetector. In this way the receiver can block out the undesired wavelengths while admitting the desired wavelength. In some embodiments, a tunable filter is continuously tunable, meaning that the filter does not have discrete quantized wavelengths but rather can make arbitrarily small wavelength adjustments via some voltage, temperature or other controlling mechanism. The receiver has access to the received signal strength level indicator (RSSI) and therefore can adjust the center wavelength of the tunable filter to maximize the received signal strength (RSS) using well-known algorithms for finding the maximum peak of a function. Note that for NG-PON2 (also referred to as time and wavelength division multiplexed PON (TWDM-PON)) the allowable spectrum that is tuned across is small (e.g. on the order of nanometers). In some embodiments, the spectrum is as small as 3 nanometers.
It is typically simpler and cheaper to tune across small wavelength regions, especially if the tunable filter does not need to be calibrated or precisely ‘know’ the wavelength it is tuned to. Instead, the burden is placed upon software to a) Maximize the RSS of a received wavelength by centering the filter around the specific wavelength using an adaptive algorithm designed to maximize signal strength; b) Determine, via management messages from the Optical Line Terminal (OLT) 104, what channel it has tuned to and whether it is the ‘correct’ channel for that ONU 112; and c) use the information from a & b to make a best guess about the proper tuning parameters for the channel the respective ONU 112 should tune to (assuming the initial channel is not correct).
Once each respective ONU 112 has downstream communication from the OLT 104, then it can be told what the appropriate upstream wavelength is by periodic management messages broadcast by the OLT 104. This information is used in the upstream wavelength tuning process described below.
Applying a feedback tuning method, such as described above, is not as simple with the ONU transmitter 111 as with the ONU receiver 113. With respect to the ONU transmitter 111, each respective multi-wavelength OLT receiver 107 cooperates in the distributed tuning process to enable each ONU 112 to properly tune its upstream laser transmission wavelength. Again, as with the receiver, the tunable laser can be made less expensively and potentially operate over a wider temperature range if precise knowledge of the laser wavelength by the ONU 112 is not necessary and if the tuning range is narrow. However, the implication of an imprecise ONU laser is that ranging includes a wavelength tuning process whereas with current fixed wavelength PONs the only processes necessary for adjustment are the adjustment of timing (Round Trip Delay) and possibly the transmit power level.
In the embodiments described herein, each ONU 112 attempts to range on a wavelength as close as possible to what the desired or default wavelength is. If no response from the OLT 104 is received, then the laser incrementally adjusts the transmit wavelength in a specific direction and tries to range again. Once the laser is transmitting within the receive wavelength window of one of the OLT upstream receivers 107, then the OLT 104 will communicate with the respective ONU 112 on all of the valid downstream wavelengths what the actual upstream wavelength the ONU is transmitting on. Since the respective ONU 112 already knows what its ‘correct’ wavelength should be, it will know if it is on the correct wavelength. If it is, the ranging process will include additional ‘fine-tune’ wavelength adjustments to center the ONU laser wavelength to the center of the OLT receiver filter for minimum loss and maximum received signal at the OLT 104.
If the respective ONU 112 is transmitting at the wrong wavelength window, then the ONU 112 will adjust the transmit wavelength to attempt to transmit at the correct wavelength. Since the ONU 112 will have been ‘calibrated’ to the alternate wavelength it will more likely tune close to the center of the correct OLT receive filter as the ONU will be ‘partially calibrated’ in the field. Then, the feedback process between the OLT 104 and the respective ONU 112 will continue until the ONU 112 is fine-tuned to the center of the correct OLT receiver window. To avoid interference on other wavelength PONs, the ranging windows of all of the PONs can be aligned so that the transmissions of a laser tuned to the wrong upstream wavelength will fall harmlessly in the other channel's quiet (or ranging) windows.
With a fixed WDM scheme, a fraction of a decibel of loss can occur when the ONU laser transmitter 111 is not precisely centered at the minimum loss point of the OLT receiver bandpass filter 115. The bandpass filter 115 does not have a flat passband and therefore being in the passband does not guarantee being at the lowest loss point. The embodiments described herein help ensure that the ONU is precisely centered in the lowest loss point of the OLT receiver filter. In addition, even the OLT receiver filter 115 may be reduced in cost as the minimum loss wavelength does not need to be absolute, but can exist within a wavelength window of tolerance, whereby the ONU will ‘lock’ to the center of the receiver filter 115. The same cost reduction can be done in the OLT laser as the ONU will ‘find’ the optimal center for the tunable ONU receiver filter 117. Additionally, the wavelength tuning processes can be on-going at both the ONU transmitter and receiver to maintain wavelength lock over temperature and other environmental considerations. Thus, the embodiments described herein provide a low cost tunable laser for each ONU 112, whereby the ONU laser transmitter 111 has relaxed tolerances and relies on feedback from the OLT 104 to adjust wavelength.
The wavelength control of a burst mode laser is complicated by the thermal impact of varying the average current (and hence heat and temperature) due to the varying duty cycle under which a burst mode laser operates. The varying average current in turn changes the laser die temperature which changes the wavelength at the well-known rate of 0.09 nm per degree Celsius. The effects of this relatively slow change in temperature during a burst transmission on different wavelengths is shown in
The techniques described herein enable stabilizing the short term wavelength drift of low cost tunable burst mode lasers such as the laser transceiver 401 in the stabilized ONU 412. In particular, a simple, low cost method of stabilizing the variation in laser wavelength due to the temperature induced wavelength shift from variable average drive current when running in a burst mode is provided. The average current in burst mode is determined by the current laser duty cycle. When a laser is transmitting a lot of data bursts upstream in a PON, the duty cycle (e.g. the % of total time the laser is on) may near 100%. The variation in wavelength from drive current is either well-known or may be determined by a simple test, such as shown in
In some embodiments, the thermally tuned laser is based only on a heater. In other embodiments, the thermally tuned laser is based only on a TEC. In another alternative embodiment, a third option exists of having a hybrid Heater/TEC. In some implementations using a hybrid Heater/TEC, the heater can have a much smaller thermal mass than a TEC and can be located near where the laser junction is and allow faster response time than a TEC. In particular, the ‘heater’ can be implemented as a dual diode mechanism, as shown in the exemplary
In implementations using a continuous dual diode/heater approach, excessive power consumption can result because essentially the laser is “ON” all of the time even if light isn't being emitted. To address the excessive power consumption, in some embodiments, the laser in transceiver 401 is ‘pre-heated’ only just before the laser is about to transmit an optical burst. This preheating is made possible because the ONU 412 knows in advance when it is about to transmit a burst since bursts are scheduled by the OLT and this schedule is transmitted in the downstream to the ONU 412. In other words, the PON scheduling mechanism is used to ‘warm up’ the laser in advance of a burst with the heater/diode. Since the short term effects are on the order of microseconds, the additional power consumption by the pre-heating stage should be small, especially for ONUs that are essentially idle (the low duty cycle ONUs which have the potential for power savings). In the limit of 90% or above duty cycle, this pre-heating approach would have power consumption results similar to the continuous dual diode/heater implementation.
In another embodiment, an externally modulated laser (EML) is used, as shown in
At block 606, the wavelength drift is compensate for by adjusting current to a temperature element coupled to the laser. In some embodiments, the temperature element is a heater, as described above. In other embodiments, the temperature element is a thermoelectric cooler. In yet other embodiments, the temperature element includes both a heater and a thermoelectric cooler. In some such embodiments, current to the thermoelectric cooler is adjusted to compensate for long term wavelength drift and current to the heater is adjusted to compensate for short term wavelength drift. In some embodiments, compensating for wavelength drift also comprises pre-heating the laser just before the laser is to transmit an optical burst based on a schedule distributed to the optical network unit. In addition, in some embodiments, compensating for wavelength drift comprises powering on the laser prior to a scheduled time for a burst transmission. The optical signal from the laser is received at an external modulator coupled to an output of the laser. The modulator permits the optical signal to be transmitted on an optical fiber at the scheduled time for the burst transmission, as described above.
Although specific embodiments have been illustrated and described herein, it will be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art that any arrangement, which is calculated to achieve the same purpose, may be substituted for the specific embodiments shown. Therefore, it is manifestly intended that this invention be limited only by the claims and the equivalents thereof.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/870,637, filed on Aug. 27, 2013 and entitled “COMPENSATOR FOR WAVELENGTH DRIFT DUE TO VARIABLE LASER INJECTION CURRENT AND TEMPERATURE IN A DIRECTLY MODULATED BURST MODE LASER”, which is referred to herein as the '637 application and incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61870637 | Aug 2013 | US |